Netlist Inc (QB) (NLST) Quote

not to badmouth papa in the least, but if i started to believe it. i would sell this in a heart beat and never look back. if i had more money to play with i'd be buying more of this every chance i could at these prices. i didnt expect this to take this much time once i took a position, but as with most things in my life i gotta learn the hard way. i can say that i learned how inept and corrupt the judicial system really is over what i thought prior to getting in though. now i at least have an approximate time frame for the ending when we get paid. so i'll just wait that out, or maybe it happens sooner.

thx for the compliment but that one you'll have to do yourself. just read it and answer the questions. the only thing i'm any good at with a pc is plain cut and paste, and researching. anything else is time consuming for me to learn. i get by on the basics now. ever since they changed all the jargon, platforms, and procedures on how to maneuver around the computer i said bleep this. i'm not relearning it all over again!!!

i will tell you one thing guaranteed though. Irell & Manella are already all over this because everything this judge pitman has said in that document denying nlst transferring the case to the eastern district is contradicting everything in prior court documents. they will have a field day with him just because his reasoning dictates he didnt read and doesnt know whats going on. good luck on whatever you decide to do.

just having fun Papa lol

LOL. Sorry gdog. Just need to balance out our optimism by considering what the other side is thinking.

everytime I get ready to ad a few hundred more Papa makes another post and then I Start thinking what if he's right lol

100lb Striper, Great info. Please post the form you filed so other shareholders can file it to scjc Texas. Please make it easy for other shareholders to follow through. Thanks in advance,

$NLST Don't sit idle. Expose the Farce and Corruption.
https://www.scjc.texas.gov/media/46893/scjc-complaint-form.pdf

i'm sure i and m have already filed their complaint against judge pitman !!!

$NLST Obviously we live in a country where you are innocent until proven guilty. What are the chances that Pitman denied NLST's motion to transfer from the WD to the ED due to his incompetence in not realizing that injunctive relief was requested by NLST.

There are 3 options here:

1. Pitman only read Micron's motion to deny the transfer and keep the case stayed pending IPRs and took everything Micron said for total facts (utter ignorance and gross negligence).

2. Pitman missed the part in NLST's motions where they did in-fact seek injunctive relief before making his ruling on the motion to deny (incompetence).

3. Pitman had interest in denying NLST their right to a timely justice by denying their motion to transfer the case or proceed with trial (malpractice, corrupt).

I would be very dissatisfied with anyone claiming that the WD docket is very heavy and they are too busy to read through all of the information before making a ruling on filed motions. There is no excuse.

$NLST Goes with my previous post below....from Micron's 10Q that I referenced and Silvia posted — "On April 28, 2021, Nettist filed two patent infringement actions against Micron in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. The first complaint alleges that one U.S. patent is infringed by certain of our non-volatile dual in-line memory modules. The second complaint alleges that three U.S. patents are infringed by certain of our load-reduced dual in-line memory modules (LRDIMMs"). Each complaint SEEKS INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, damages, attorneys' fees, and costs."

Like I previously said and pointed out....Pitman is a hack....and knows exactly what he's doing by misrepresenting Netlist's position, or ignoring it. Furthermore....Micron is playing games, stating one thing to the SEC in their 10Q filing, and the complete opposite in court documents.

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_577942368.png

Stokd $NLST In Silvia's post of Micron's 10Q Patent Matters, when referring to our WD case/s — "Each complaint seeks injunctive relief" — Micron admits Netlist is seeking an injunction.

Yet "lack of injunctive relief" was the basis for Judge Pitman's denial of lifting the WD case stay.
"Specifically, the Court found that a stay would not unduly prejudice Netlist because it had delayed in serving Micron with its complaints and because, although Netlist has alleged that competes with Micron, Netlist has not requested injunctive relief from the Court."

And Micron contradicts its own 10Q—they can lie to Courts but not SEC.
"Micron argues that maintaining the stay would not unduly prejudice Netlist because Netlist has not requested injunctive relief in this case"
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_577941157.png

Pitman justifies his farce — "While competition between the parties can weigh in favor of finding undue prejudice, a party’s failure to request injunctive relief can indicate that the party is not unduly prejudiced by a stay of its case."

lets just keep our fingers crossed and hope it works out. i just cant see cafc succumbing to peetab after cafc has already upheld the 912.

Yup that's basically what I said too, it might not impact them at all. And last PTAB decision was in their favor, so they're not wrong in what they said. And Director Review (with compromised Vidal) won't help Netlist. I've said it before, the weight of the Netlist world rides on the CAFC patent decision. And I think we have the ace in the hole with Warwick on that case. That's why I'm still hopeful. Just can never be sure till it concludes.

lol !!!! so they say it will have no impact upon their business...........
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_577934846.jpeg

i agree with everything you said. but i dont think they counted on nlst to go the distance with them. so the thing is the perspective has changed dramatically and so will the outcome. their just in so deep now they only have 2 choices, settle or see it to its conclusion.

EXACTLY !!! https://netlist.com/products/sk-hynix/

NLST BABY !!!

GET SOME !!!

Yes most likely they will. Let's hope by the time the SK contract needs renewal we'll have some conclusion to the 2 questions of patent validations and Netlist viability as a business.
Let's realize we see things through Netlist 'rose colored glasses'. We're quite sure the patents and the appeals will all hold up, and we hope Netlist has enough funds to keep going and keep paying for litigation. If we just try to think like the infringers and even SK, we'd see that they're thinking and hoping for the exact opposite as what we're thinking and hoping for. And to be honest, it's benefited them greatly over the years. Yes things are finally going in Netlist favor with litigations, but the opposition sees the possibility (even if slim) of it all eventually going their way. Patents remain invalidated. Netlist goes bankrupt. Either or, and they're finally off the hook completely (or for the most part). That's why despite winning over a billion dollars (including interest) in our court cases so far with more to come, our stock price languishes. Not only do the infringers hope and believe these things, so do the shorters, market makers, and the market in general. There is a perception problem with Netlist that only final conclusion of patent validations, trials, and appeals will dispel.
And we believe the truth is on our side. And for that we wait.

TOMKiLA $MU forget to pay netlist for its tech before to talk about HBM! Over 445m $ in the last patent litigation for only 2 patents. The next patent litigation will be soon about 5 different patent that cover all the dram revenues of micron (ddr5, LRDIMM and HBM) $NLST

“Netlist Innovation: In 2010, Netlist invented proprietary designs underpinning the successful creation and proliferation of stacked HBM today. Netlist stands at the forefront of HBM innovation allowing for the recent explosive growth of AI. Netlist’s innovations help provide those performance gains, thus allowing AI to tackle more challenging tasks and execute operations that were previously unimaginable”
https://netlist.com/about/

Well like you said they are making big $ with NLST so why would they switch?

i'm just hoping it works out the same way and they dont change their minds!!!

coupled with they have to see the writing on the wall concerning the outcome of our current litigation

They were the only ones that saw it the first time, that why they made the deal.

fwiw, my 2 cents is they renegotiate. seeing they settled the first time around and have increased their revenue through doing so, coupled with they have to see the writing on the wall concerning the outcome of our current litigation. which just happens to be in the area of finalization by the time their contract is up.

i cant see them wanting us to have to sue them all over again, but then again i have learned the lunacy of what can happen with all this bs backstabbing ip legal infringement as a business through a convoluted justice system that allows it to take place for way too long before they can do anything about it !!!!

thxs no not playing foriegn either way to many to play already

I know the contract was made and it was mentioned here how long before it comes up again. seems like 26 but thats just a guess

SK has an agreement with Netlist. But they, like the other infringers, may still hope that either: 1)Netlist's patents get invalidated, or 2)Netlist goes under. Either way there would be no need for them to renegotiate a contract with Netlist when their current contact ends (which I wonder how long their agreement is for?). Until patents are validated (yet again) and the viability of Netlist is assured, we have no real friends.

already looked it up its on the korean exchange. i stopped there as i do not want to bother with trading foreign exchanges. although, with the current events and revenue going there way it sounds like a really good long term play. g/l....

and yes i've wondered about the plug thing many times since i've held nlst.

Is SK hynix publicly traded? if so you know the ticker? I can't seem to fined it
Why can't they throw NLST a bone while plugging for SK

Morgan Stanley says memory stocks are set for ‘new highs’ and names its top picks
PUBLISHED WED, JUN 26 20247:13 PM EDTUPDATED MOMENTS AGO

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/27/morgan-stanley-likes-the-memory-sector-and-picks-its-top-stocks.html

sign up to get the rest of it........

From the Morgan Stanley piece on the leaders in the Hbm market here is the quote

“We think SK Hynix is clearly in a league of its own within the HBM [high-bandwidth memory] category, and believe it will sustain the best idiosyncratic growth/returns and hold the majority of HBM market share in 2025,” the analysts explained.”

those numbers should make some head lines. i know the cutting of that check will definitely spring board the pps. and rigged is putting it mildly.

The system is rigged against the little guy when the Google case starts I think peoples eyes will open!!

mainstream gets to realize it when scam and micrap finally allow their share holders to read the q or 10k that says they cut nlst a check or checks that significantly cut into their bottom line. not too mention how it will cut into future bottom lines !!!

other than that they only get to read the occasional pr from nlst that says they won hundreds of millions of dollars for willful theft of ip. i dont think either of the two even put out a pr saying what happens to them at the conclusion of jury trials. i could be wrong but it was just a passing thought that i'm not even going to bother to find out lol !!!

When is mainstream going to realize NetList patents is reason Micron and Samsung are able to do what they do https://netlist.com/products/ai-server/

Looks like Micron is making bank at the expense of NetList

Stokd $NLST The briefing on Netlist's motion requesting Final Judgment in the Micron 294 case—with $445 million trial verdict—is complete. It's in Gilstrap's hands now....we'll soon hear what he thinks and has to say, maybe he just drops Final Judgment as his ruling on the motion—granted!

All but the actual motion—which was posted here May 30—are sealed. Pictured are Micron's Response, followed by Netlist's Reply, and lastly today Micron's Sur-Reply. Now, after allowing due process and following procedure, the judge can act.

It may seem as though nothing is happening, but there is a lot going on at all times—considering the amount of parallel litigation—and often quietly....progress is made.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_577839168.png

absolutely without a doubt, but then again its the dam waiting on closure!!!

I'm sure the accounting dept at Irell & Manella already has it figured out,  including royalties.  We're just waiting for Gilstrap to close any air gaps.

crime pays very well especially when everyone thinks your honestly making all your money on your own merit.

i wouldnt even argue with ya on the issue.

Wall Street is expecting chipmaker Micron to report an 80% jump in revenue in its third-quarter earnings results.

It'll be interesting to see how Netlist's technology contributed to Micron's bottom line.

https://qz.com/micron-revenue-expected-jump-third-quarter-earnings-1851561329

€

And charge them for the delay … every day $$$

Justice Delayed is Justice Denied - Kinda think we're at this point

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice_delayed_is_justice_denied#:~:text=%22Justice%20delayed%20is%20justice%20denied,having%20no%20remedy%20at%20all.

its coming but on the judicial systems time line.

i already know scum will appeal, and am quite aware that strap isnt accommodating them with whatever he decides. he's just leaving them less and less options to pull later. as cut and dry as this is, the time consuming process is ridiculous !!!

Samsung has run out of benefit of the doubt, hope the judge puts the hammer down.

Just my opinion, but I think the continuance will be granted. What is a month or two more, in the grand scheme of this trial? Gilstrap knows that, and realizes that if such a request isn't granted, it would provide definite grounds for appeal. Even though there's almost no DOUBT Samsung will appeal a loss, he doesn't want his court to help them with a reason for having that appeal granted.

one of these days.........even though we have to put up with all possible delays we're simultaneously getting to the resolution stronger and stronger for a final conclusion.................
https://stocktwits.com/100lbstriper/message/577727604
100lbstriper
43m

@trcxr4kids @DocBoom7 sure they are, we just have to wait till that day comes. alls their doing is using their options to delay the inevitable at this point. we're in the final phase of the trials, the payment part. worst case scenario i say is 2.5 years out and all the awards come due and start rolling in, maybe sooner. so yes they will be compelled to pay. they entered a game where their opponent has the fuel to go the distance. cafc is always a final trial when its being tried as a payment trial. the 2 wins to be appealed to cafc and the probable one in august will make 3 awards due. of course we have to win them on the cafc level, but guess what, i'm betting its a slam dunk. so not being compelled is a privileged option you get from our judicial system. an option that eventually runs out when your guilty under pursuit of an adversary that can prove you wrong and last the duration of the system. my 2 cents, 2.5 years is maximum amount of time left. lol... but boy oh boy would i LIKE TO SEE IT TODAY!!!

I honestly expected much worse, something indefinite put forth by Samsung that would be related to the BOC case. So it's a sigh of relief for me!
And how do we know after the month delay they still do something indefinite one month is BS Gilstrp please don't grant it.

by now the court, gilstrap knows this is premeditated behaviour. hoping to see something soon saying DENIED.

NLST I would like to point out that Samsung's Continuance motion is opposed by Netlist, who isn't laying down or accepting it without a fight, and obviously has reasons or standing to oppose.

Netlist filed their response the day after Samsung filed the motion, so I assume we'll get the unsealed version of Netlist's opposition tomorrow, and get specifics on Netlist's/Sheasby's position.

So who knows....it's not a given that Gilstrap grants, there is a chance he doesn't entertain it. We'll see how it plays out. But to stress again...after everything we have been through, and considering we're talking about a month continuance....it is not that bad in the big scheme of things.

I honestly expected much worse, something indefinite put forth by Samsung that would be related to the BOC case. So it's a sigh of relief for me!
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_577702232.png