The
Corporations provision for loan loss expense recorded each quarter is
determined by managements evaluation of the risk characteristics of the loan
portfolio. As mentioned above, net charge-offs increased during the first
quarter of 2010 to $1,366,000, compared to net charge-offs of $371,000 for the
first quarter of 2009. PNBC recorded a loan loss provision of $3,925,000 in the
first quarter of 2010 compared to a provision of $1,170,000 in the first
quarter of 2009. The allowance for loan losses is discussed more fully below.
Non-interest
income totaled $3,192,000 for the first quarter of 2010, compared to $2,795,000
in the first quarter of 2009, an increase of $397,000 or 14.2%. $316,000 of
this increase was realized with the adoption of ASC 310 adoption of deferred
loan fees. The increase was primarily due to the increase in gains on
securities sold of $455,000 and $459,000 increase in mortgage banking income
for the first quarter of 2010. During the first quarter of 2009, a $556,000
impairment charge was recorded for mortgage servicing rights. The categories of
service charges on deposits and trust and farm management fees also experienced
decreases of $85,000 (8.7%) and $50,000 (15.9.%), respectively, due to a
decrease in overdraft fee income and lower fees from a decline in managed asset
values. Annualized non-interest income as a percentage of total average assets
increased from 0.96% for the first three months of 2009, to 1.06% for the same
period in 2010.
Total
non-interest expense for the first quarter of 2010 was $9,286,000, an increase
of $635,000 (or 7.3%) from $8,652,000 in the first quarter of 2009. The largest
difference between the first quarters of 2010 and 2009 was an increase in other
real estate expenses of $622,000, an increase of 550.4%. Other real estate
owned increased by $17.0 million to $20.1 million at March 31, 2010 compared to
$3.2 million at March 31, 2009. Additionally, the category of other operating
expense increased $118,000 (or 10.1%) due mostly to an increase in loan
administrative expenses. Annualized non-interest expense as a percentage of
total average assets increased to 3.09% for the first three months of 2010,
compared to 2.96% for the same period in 2009.
INCOME TAXES
The
Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of $795,000 for the first quarter of
2010, as compared to an income tax benefit of $104,000 for the first quarter of
2009. The effective tax rate was (148.3%) for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2010 and (9.9%) for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009. The
income tax benefit is due to a pre-tax loss coupled with the effect of
tax-exempt investment interest income. For more information on the
Corporations income taxes see Note 9 Income Taxes in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
FDIC
On
September 29, 2009 the Board of Directors of the FDIC adopted a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) that would require insured institutions to prepay
their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009
and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The FDIC estimates that the total prepaid
assessments collected would be approximately $45 billion. The FDIC Board also
voted to adopt a uniform three-basis point increase in assessment rates
effective on January 1, 2011, and extend the restoration period from seven to
eight years.
Under
GAAP accounting rules, unlike special assessments, prepaid assessments would
not immediately affect bank earnings. Each institution would record the entire
amount of its assessment related to future periods as a prepaid expense (an
asset) as of December 31, 2009, the date the payment would be made. The
Corporation paid an assessment of $6,763,000 for the fourth quarter of 2009 and
for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012.
As
of March 31, 2010, and each quarter thereafter, each institution would record
an expense (charge to earnings) for its regular quarterly assessment and an
offsetting credit to the prepaid assessment until the asset is exhausted. At
December 31, 2009, the Corporation had a remaining prepaid assessment of
$5,634,000. This amount is reflected in the category of Other Assets in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. $698,000 of FDIC assessment expense was recorded for
the first quarter of 2010.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total
assets at March 31, 2010 decreased to $1,200,474,000 from $1,260,730,000 at
December 31, 2009 (a decrease of $60.3 million or 4.8%). Total loan balances
decreased by $43.8 million during the three month period to $742.2 million due
to seasonal pay downs in the agricultural portfolio, along with the refinancing
of adjustable-rate residential real estate loans into fixed rate products which
are sold in the secondary market and loans participation sales. Investment
balances totaled $264,406,000 at March 31, 2010, compared to $301,267,000 at
December 31, 2009 (a decrease of $35.4 million, or 11.8%), as investments gains
were realized on sales of securities as part of managements overall asset
liability management plans to increase liquidity. Total deposits decreased to
$1,031,454,000 at March 31, 2010 from $1,075,539,000 at December 31, 2009 (a
decrease of $44.1 million or 4.1%). Comparing categories of deposits at March
31, 2010 to December 31, 2009, time deposits decreased $37.4 million (or 7.5%),
interest-bearing demand deposits increased $2.9 million (or 0.8%), savings
deposits increased $4.7 million (or 6.9%), and demand deposits decreased $14.2
million (or 10.4%). Borrowings, consisting of customer repurchase agreements,
federal funds purchased, notes payable, treasury, tax, and loan (TT&L)
deposits, and Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances, decreased from
$104,848,000 at December 31, 2009 to $88,096,000 at March 31, 2010 (a decrease
of $16.8 million or 16.0%). This decrease was due to the repayment of
interest-bearing demand notes issued by the U.S. Treasury and customer
repurchase agreements of ($9.0 million and $8.2 million) respectively for the
three month period compared to December 31, 2009. TT&L increased $493,000
for the first quarter of 2010.
CAPITAL PURCHASE PROGRAM
On
January 23, 2009, the Corporation received $25,083,000 of equity capital by
issuing to the United States Department of Treasury 25,083 shares of the
Corporations 5.00% Series B Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock,
no par value, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and a ten-year
warrant to purchase up to 155,025 shares of the Corporations common stock, par
value $5.00 per share, at an exercise price of $24.27 per share. The proceeds
received were allocated to the preferred stock and common stock warrants based
on their relative fair values. The resulting discount on the preferred stock is
amortized against retained earnings and is reflected in the Corporations
consolidated statement of income as Preferred shares dividends, resulting in
additional dilution to the Corporations earnings per common share. The
warrants are immediately exercisable, in whole or in part, over a term of 10
years. The warrants were included in the Corporations diluted average common
shares outstanding (subject to anti-dilution). Both the preferred securities
and warrants were accounted for as additions to the Corporations regulatory
Tier 1 and total capital.
The
Series B Preferred stock is not mandatorily redeemable and will pay cumulative
dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years and 9% per year
thereafter. Any redemption requires Federal Reserve approval. The Series B
Perpetual Preferred stock ranks senior to the Corporations existing authorized
Series A Junior Participating Preferred stock.
A
company that participates must adopt certain standards for executive
compensation, including (a) prohibiting golden parachute payments as defined
in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) to senior Executive
Officers; (b) requiring recovery of any compensation paid to senior Executive
Officers based on criteria that is later proven to be materially inaccurate;
(c) prohibiting incentive compensation that encourages unnecessary and
excessive risks that threaten the value of the financial institution; and (d)
accepting restrictions on the payment of dividends and the repurchase of common
stock.
ASSET QUALITY
For
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the subsidiary bank charged off
$1,417,000 of loans and had recoveries of $99,000, compared to charge-offs of
$411,000 and recoveries of $42,000 during the three months ended March 31,
2009. The allowance for loan losses is based on factors that include the
overall composition of the loan portfolio, types of loans, underlying
collateral, past loss experience, loan delinquencies, substandard and doubtful
credits, and such other factors that, in managements reasonable judgment,
warrant consideration. The adequacy of the allowance is monitored monthly. At
March 31, 2010, the allowance was $14,682,000 which is 21.8% of non-performing
loans and 1.94% of total loans, compared with $12,075,000 which was 20.6% of
non-performing loans and 1.51% of total loans at December 31, 2009.
Non-performing
loans increased to $67,291,000 or 9.08% of net loans at March 31, 2010, as
compared to $58,621,000 or 7.35% of net loans at December 31, 2009.
Approximately 65% of the non-accrual loans are seven relationships totaling
$16.8 million, all of which are development loans in the Corporations northern
and eastern market areas. Specific reserves had been established for these
seven relationships as of March 31, 2010 of $3.7 million. All loans are
individually evaluated and management continues to maintain adequate reserves
in the allowance for loan losses.
At
March 31, 2010 non-accrual loans were $53,448,000 compared to $42,593,000 at
December 31, 2009. Impaired loans totaled $25,906,000 at March 31, 2010
compared to $12,196,000 at December 31, 2009. The total amount of loans ninety
days or more past due and still accruing interest at March 31, 2010 was $22,000
compared to $2,087,000 at December 31, 2009. There was a specific loan loss
reserve of $6,271,000 established for impaired loans as of March 31, 2010
compared to a specific loan loss reserve of $2,905,000 at December 31, 2009.
PNBCs management analyzes the allowance for loan losses monthly and believes
the current level of allowance is adequate to meet probable losses as of March 31, 2010.
The
following table provides information about the Corporations non-performing
assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31,
2010
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
March
31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual
|
|
|
$
|
53,448
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,593
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,136
|
|
|
90 days past due and accruing
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
Restructured
|
|
|
|
13,821
|
|
|
|
|
13,941
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
$
|
67,291
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,621
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,281
|
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
|
20,145
|
|
|
|
|
17,658
|
|
|
|
|
3,170
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
|
$
|
87,436
|
|
|
|
$
|
76,279
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
|
9.08
|
%
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
%
|
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
|
7.28
|
%
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
The
allowance for possible loan losses shown in this table below represents the
allowance available to absorb losses within the portfolio (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2010
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of loans outstanding at end of
period (net of unearned interest)
|
|
|
$
|
756,836
|
|
|
|
$
|
798,074
|
|
|
|
$
|
774,802
|
|
|
Average amount of loans outstanding for the
period (net of unearned interest)
|
|
|
$
|
778,162
|
|
|
|
$
|
743,877
|
|
|
|
$
|
778,731
|
|
|
Allowance for possible loan losses at beginning
of the period
|
|
|
$
|
12,075
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,064
|
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agricultural
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
Installment
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
|
|
|
4,256
|
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agricultural
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Installment
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Net loans charged-off
|
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
|
4,051
|
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
3,925
|
|
|
|
|
11,062
|
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
Allowance for possible loan losses at end
of period
|
|
|
$
|
14,682
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,075
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,864
|
|
|
Net loans charged-off to Average loans
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
%
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
Allowance for possible loan losses To
non-performing loans
|
|
|
|
21.82
|
%
|
|
|
|
20.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
17.62
|
%
|
|
Allowance for possible loan losses to total
loans at end of period (net of unearned interest)
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
%
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Federal
regulations require all financial institutions to evaluate capital adequacy by
the risk-based capital method, which makes capital requirements more sensitive
to the differences in the level of risk assets. At March 31, 2010, total
risk-based capital of PNBC was 11.96%, compared to 11.50% at December 31, 2009.
The Tier 1 capital ratio increased from 7.48% at December 31, 2009, to 7.53% at
March 31, 2010. Total stockholders equity to total assets at March 31, 2010
increased to 6.33% from 5.92% at December 31, 2009.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity
is measured by a financial institutions ability to raise funds through
deposits, borrowed funds, capital, or the sale of assets. Additional sources of
liquidity include cash flow from the repayment of loans and the maturity of
investment securities. Major uses of cash include the origination of loans and
purchase of investment securities. Cash flows provided by investing and
operating activities, offset by those used in financing activities, resulted in
a net increase in cash and cash equivalents of $24,053,000 from December 31,
2009 to March 31, 2010. This increase was primarily the result of the proceeds
received from the sale of investment securities and a decrease in loans, offset
by net decreases in deposits and borrowings. For more detailed information, see
PNBCs Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET
RISK
The
Corporation generates agribusiness, commercial, mortgage and consumer loans to
customers located primarily in North Central Illinois. The Corporations loans
are generally secured by specific items of collateral including real property,
consumer assets and business assets. Although the Corporation has a diversified
loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its debtors ability to honor their
contracts is dependent upon economic conditions in the agricultural industry.
In
the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers, the
subsidiary bank is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk.
These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby
letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of
credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the
consolidated balance sheets. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect
the extent of involvement the subsidiary bank has in particular classes of
financial instruments.
The
subsidiary banks exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by
the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit
and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount
of those instruments. The subsidiary bank uses the same credit policies in
making commitments and conditional obligations as they do for on-balance-sheet
instruments. At March 31, 2010, commitments to extend credit and standby
letters of credit were approximately $101,753,000 and $3,924,000 respectively.
Commitments
to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally
have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without
being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent
future cash requirements. The subsidiary bank evaluates each customers
creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if
deemed necessary, by the subsidiary bank upon extension of credit is based on
managements credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies, but
may include real estate, accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and
equipment, and income-producing properties.
Standby
letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the subsidiary bank to
guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk
involved in issuing standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that
involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The subsidiary bank secures
the standby letters of credit with the same collateral used to secure the loan.
The maximum amount of credit that would be extended under standby letters of
credit is equal to the off-balance sheet contract amount. The standby letters
of credit have terms that expire in one year or less.
LAND HELD FOR SALE
The
Corporation owns separate lots in Elburn, Aurora and Somonauk, Illinois that
have been removed from the land balance and are now shown on the Corporations
balance sheet as land held-for-sale, at the lower of cost or market. The land
in Elburn, approximately 2 acres, was purchased in 2003 for $930,000 in
anticipation of the construction of a branch facility. The land in Aurora,
consisting of two lots remaining from the original purchase of fourteen acres
in 2004 which was used to construct a branch facility has a cost basis of
$1,344,000. The land in Somonauk, acquired in 2005 during the acquisition of
FSB Bancorp, Inc., consists of approximately two acres with a cost basis of
$80,000.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There
are various claims pending against the Corporations subsidiary bank, arising
in the normal course of business. Management believes, based upon consultation
with legal counsel, that liabilities arising from these proceedings, if any,
will not be material to the Corporations financial position or results of
operation.
QUANTIATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
Smaller
reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by
this item.
EFFECTS OF INFLATION
The
consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data
presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and practices within the
banking industry which require the measurement of financial condition and
operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering the
changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.
Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a
financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have
a more significant impact on a financial institutions performance than the
effects of general levels of inflation.
PRINCETON
NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
The
following table sets forth (in thousands) details of average balances, interest
income and expense, and resulting annualized yields/costs for the Corporation
for the periods indicated, reported on a fully taxable equivalent basis, using
a tax rate of 34%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended, March 31, 2010
|
|
Three Months Ended, March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Yield/
Cost
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
|
|
Yield/
Cost
|
|
Average
Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
61,316
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
$
|
35,708
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
Taxable investment
securities
|
|
|
148,478
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
|
148,917
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
4.91
|
%
|
Tax-exempt investment
securities
|
|
|
126,315
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
6.58
|
%
|
|
106,754
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
199
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Net loans
|
|
|
725,573
|
|
|
10,621
|
|
|
5.94
|
%
|
|
746,711
|
|
|
11,095
|
|
|
6.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
1,061,828
|
|
|
14,193
|
|
|
5.42
|
%
|
|
1,038,289
|
|
|
14,624
|
|
|
5.71
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average non-interest
earning assets
|
|
|
158,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average assets
|
|
$
|
1,220,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,186,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
deposits
|
|
$
|
378,885
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
1.22
|
%
|
$
|
262,338
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
70,155
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
63,167
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
471,757
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
1.90
|
%
|
|
567,448
|
|
|
4,399
|
|
|
3.14
|
%
|
Interest-bearing demand
notes issued to the U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
0.39
|
%
|
Customer repurchase
agreements
|
|
|
42,008
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
0.93
|
%
|
|
30,708
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
1.07
|
%
|
Advances from Federal Home
Loan Bank
|
|
|
27,644
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
32,493
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
3.08
|
%
|
Trust preferred securities
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
Note payable
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
9,631
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1,016,378
|
|
|
3,977
|
|
|
1.59
|
%
|
|
992,869
|
|
|
5,927
|
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on average
interest-earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,216
|
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,697
|
|
|
3.40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
non-interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
127,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average stockholders
equity
|
|
|
76,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,220,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,186,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table
reconciles tax-equivalent net interest income (as shown above) to net interest
income as reported on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Net interest income as
stated
|
|
$
|
9,483
|
|
$
|
8,079
|
|
Tax equivalent adjustment-investments
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
582
|
|
Tax equivalent adjustment-loans
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent net
interest income
|
|
$
|
10,216
|
|
$
|
8,697
|
|
Schedule
7
ITEM 7
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a)
Disclosure controls and procedures. We evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2010. Our disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that we designed to ensure that we record, process, summarize and report in a timely manner the information we must disclose in reports that we file with or submit to the SEC. President and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, reviewed and participated in this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that, as of the date of their evaluation, our disclosure controls were effective.
(b)
Internal controls. There have been significant changes in our internal accounting controls
or in other factors during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that have strengthened those controls as described below.
During the audit of the financial statements as of December 31, 2009, BKD, LLP, the Corporations external public accounting firm identified certain control deficiencies that were material weaknesses. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Companys annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses noted were in the follow areas: allowance for loan losses, appraisal values, collateral analysis and internal loan review. These deficiencies are inter-related and management has taken remediation actions to address these internal control matters. Management has remediated each of these material weaknesses as of March 31, 2010. A more complete discussion of managements actions are detailed below.
In evaluating the cause of the above referenced control deficiencies, management has identified that added human resources were needed in the internal loan review area. Internal loan review works with management in preparing the analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Appraisal values and collateral analysis is a key portion of determining the adequacy of the allowance. During 2009, a second person was added to the internal loan review staff. A third person was added in January 2010. These two additions each possess credit analysis and lending experience. Internal loan review had modified its loan review program to enhance its coverage of the loan portfolio on an annual basis with emphasis on the largest loans and those identified as problems. Further, loan review coverage and sampling of the remaining loan portfolio is also a part of its 2010 program. Noted reporting requirements discussed in the formal written agreement between Citizens First National Bank and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency are being met. The bulk sales value method has been added to appraisal for development loans and is also used by internal loan review in assessing loans for impairment. Management believes that while the actions taken currently are adequate, further actions will likely be needed to enhance its internal controls.
Princeton National Bancorp (CE) (USOTC:PNBC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Princeton National Bancorp (CE) (USOTC:PNBC)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024