UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
Commission File No. 333-140637

PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in it charter)

Delaware
 
13-4343369
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(IRS Employer Identification No.)

4961 Windplay Drive, Suite 100
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(916) 939-0400

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.       x  Yes       ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period than the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   ¨  Yes      ¨ No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes  x No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

29,099,750 shares of the issuer’s common stock are issued and outstanding as of August 16, 2010.


 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
 
   
Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION  
1
Item 1.
Financial Statements
1
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
2
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
11
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
11
     
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
12
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
12
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
12
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
12
Item 4.
(Removed and Reserved)  
Item 5.
Other Information
12
Item 6.
Exhibits
12
   
Signatures
14


 
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

Our financial statements start on the following page, beginning with page F-1.

1

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
AS OF JUNE 30, 2010 AND DECEMBER 31, 2009
 
(in thousands, except share data)
 
             
   
June 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
ASSETS
 
(unaudited)
   
(unaudited)
 
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 1,561     $ 3,792  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
               
$227 and $137 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
    11,374       7,676  
Inventory
    1,810       1,824  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    1,286       432  
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts
    7,837       13,674  
Other receivables
    103       175  
Deferred tax assets
    227       473  
Total current assets
    24,198       28,046  
                 
Property and equipment, net
    512       615  
Intangible assets, net
    871       970  
Goodwill
    10,508       12,254  
Deferred tax assets
    -       1,295  
Total assets
  $ 36,089     $ 43,180  
                 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 18,078     $ 18,347  
Accrued liabilities
    1,951       2,043  
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
    436       374  
Taxes payable
    225       293  
Customer deposits
    1,268       -  
Borrowings, current
    1,658       1,692  
Total current liabilities
    23,616       22,749  
                 
Borrowings, non-current
    339       548  
Contingent consideration liability
    1,949       7,725  
Total liabilities
    25,904       31,022  
                 
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 12)
               
Shareholders' equity:
               
Series A convertible preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share: 5,000,000 shares
         
  designated; 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized; 3,500,000
               
  shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
    -       -  
Series B convertible preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share: 2,800,000 shares designated;
         
20,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized; 2,800,000 and 2,800,000 shares issued and
         
  outstanding at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
    -       -  
Common stock, par value $.0001 per share; 500,000,000 shares authorized;
               
  29,099,750 and 29,050,250 shares issued and outstanding at
               
  June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively
    3       3  
Additional paid-in-capital
    18,251       17,822  
Accumulated deficit
    (5,464 )     (5,385 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (2,605 )     (282 )
Total shareholders' equity
    10,185       12,158  
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
  $ 36,089     $ 43,180  
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
F-1

 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND JUNE 30, 2009
 
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
                         
                         
   
For Three Months ended June 30,
   
For Six Months ended June 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(unaudited)
   
(unaudited)
   
(unaudited)
   
(unaudited)
 
                         
Net sales
  $ 9,026     $ 4,114     $ 12,425     $ 8,908  
Cost of sales
    (8,576 )     (3,585 )     (11,944 )     (8,011 )
Gross profit
    450       529       481       897  
                                 
Operating expenses:
                               
Sales and marketing
    771       734       1,512       1,389  
General and administrative
    1,521       1,248       3,181       2,376  
Total operating expenses
    2,292       1,982       4,693       3,765  
                                 
Operating loss
    (1,842 )     (1,453 )     (4,212 )     (2,868 )
                                 
Other income (expense):
                               
Interest expense
    (38 )     (6 )     (75 )     (8 )
Other expense
    (64 )     -       (64 )     -  
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability
    4,522       -       5,776       -  
Change in fair value of financial instruments
    -       708       -       2,184  
Interest income
    4       11       5       28  
Total other income (expense), net
    4,424       713       5,642       2,204  
                                 
Income (loss) before income taxes
    2,582       (740 )     1,430       (664 )
                                 
Income tax (expense ) benefit
    (1,855 )     481       (1,509 )     1,126  
                                 
Net income (loss)
  $ 727     $ (259 )   $ (79 )   $ 462  
                                 
Earnings (loss) Per Share:
                               
                                 
Basic
  $ 0.03     $ (0.01 )   $ (0.00 )   $ 0.02  
Diluted
  $ 0.02     $ (0.01 )   $ (0.00 )   $ 0.02  
                                 
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
                               
                                 
Basic
    26,602       26,049       26,582       26,049  
Diluted
    32,902       26,049       26,582       30,257  
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
F-2

 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND JUNE 30, 2009
 
(in thousands)
 
             
   
JUNE 30, 2010
   
JUNE 30, 2009
 
   
(unaudited)
   
(unaudited)
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
           
Net (loss) income
  $ (79 )   $ 462  
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
               
   used in operating activities:
               
Stock based compensation
    482       290  
Depreciation and amortization
    179       202  
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability
    (5,776 )     -  
Change in fair value of warrant liability
    -       (2,184 )
Deferred taxes
    1,504       (1,159 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    (4,226 )     2,661  
Inventory
    (184 )     (886 )
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    (954 )     184  
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
               
 on uncompleted contracts
    4,275       (706 )
Other receivables
    (692 )     (1,580 )
Taxes receivable
    54       (65 )
Accounts payable
    2,162       (1,726 )
Accrued liabilities
    60       (248 )
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
               
 on uncompleted contracts
    107       (663 )
Taxes payable
    (27 )     (7 )
Customer deposits
    1,383       -  
Net cash used in operating activities
    (1,732 )     (5,425 )
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Acquisition of property and equipment
    (30 )     (75 )
Net cash used in investing activities
    (30 )     (75 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Principal payments on borrowings
    (300 )     (28 )
Proceeds from line of credit
    -       139  
Proceeds from borrowings
    157       347  
Proceeds from issuance of series B preferred stock
    -       3,000  
Cost related to share registration
    (183 )     (107 )
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities
    (326 )     3,351  
Effect of foreign currency
    (143 )     (69 )
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (2,231 )     (2,218 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    3,792       5,770  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 1,561     $ 3,552  
                 
Supplemental cash flow information:
               
Interest paid
  $ 63     $ 8  
Taxes paid
  $ -     $ 39  
                 
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
               
Warrant liability settled with equity
  $ -     $ 8,935  
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
F-3

 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
 
(in thousands and unaudited)
 
                                                             
   
Common Stock
   
Series A - Preferred Stock
   
Series B - Preferred Stock
   
Additional Paid
   
(Accumulated
   
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
       
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
In Capital
   
Deficit)
   
Loss
   
Total
 
                                                             
Balance December 31, 2009
    29,050     $ 3       3,500     $ -       2,800     $ -     $ 17,822     $ (5,385 )   $ (282 )   $ 12,158  
                                                                                 
Net loss
                                                            (79 )             (79 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                                                    (2,323 )     (2,323 )
Comprehensive loss
                                                                            (2,402 )
Stock based compensation
    50                                               482                       482  
Cost related to share registration
                                                    (53 )                     (53 )
                                                                                 
Balance June 30, 2010
    29,100     $ 3       3,500     $ -       2,800     $ -     $ 18,251     $ (5,464 )   $ (2,605 )   $ 10,185  
                                                                                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
 
F-4

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)


1.             ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS
 
Premier Power Renewable Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Parent”), through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Premier Power Renewable Energy, Inc., a California corporation (“Premier Power California”), and Rupinvest Sarl (“Rupinvest”), and Premier Power California’s two wholly owned subsidiaries, Bright Future Technologies LLC (“Bright Future”) and Premier Power Sociedad Limitada (“Premier Power Spain”), and Rupinvest’s wholly owned subsidiary, Premier Power Italy S.p.A. (“Premier Power Italy”) (collectively the “Company”), designs, engineers, and installs photovoltaic systems in the United States, Italy, and Spain.
 
On June 16, 2009, the Company sold to Vision Opportunity Master Fund (“Vision”) 2.8 million shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (bearing no liquidation preference, no coupon payments, and no redemption rights) in exchange for the cancellation of 3.5 million Series A and Series B warrants held by Vision, and $3 million in cash.  The cancellation of warrants resulted in the elimination of all the Company’s issued and outstanding warrants.
 
On July 31, 2009, the Company purchased 100% of the issued and outstanding equity ownership of Rupinvest, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of Luxembourg, from Esdras Ltd., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of Cyprus (“Esdras”).  Rupinvest distributes, develops, and integrates ground mount and rooftop solar power systems in Italy through its then majority-owned subsidiary, Premier Power Italy (formerly known as ARCO Energy, SRL), a private limited liability company organized under the laws of Italy.  Prior to the closing, Rupinvest was a wholly owned subsidiary of Esdras.  The Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding equity ownership interest in Rupinvest from Esdras in exchange for: (a) a cash payment by us to Esdras in the amount of twelve thousand five hundred Euros (€12,500, or approximately $18,292); and (b) the potential transfer to Esdras of up to three million shares of the Company’s restricted common stock, with the number of shares to be transferred, if any, to be calculated based on achieving certain sales by Premier Power Italy over a three-year period.  Pursuant to the closing of this transaction, the Company conducts operations in Italy through Premier Power Italy.  On December 31, 2009, Rupinvest purchased the remaining 10% interest of Premier Power Italy from Esdras at Esdras’ initial capital contribution per the Share Exchange Agreement, and Premier Power Italy became the wholly owned subsidiary of Rupinvest.
 
F-5

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
 
2.             SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Basis of Presentation – The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information.  They should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 appearing in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 that is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The March 31, 2010 and 2009 unaudited interim consolidated financial statements on Form 10-Q have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for smaller reporting companies.  Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company’s management believes the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein.  The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent and its subsidiaries.  Intercompany balances, transactions, and cash flows are eliminated on consolidation.  
 
Concentrations and Credit Risk – Three customers accounted for 25.2%, 9.5%, and 7.0%, respectively, of the Company’s sales for the three months ended June 30, 2010.  Two customers each accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s sales for the three months ended June 30, 2009 that in the aggregate accounted for 22.3% of the Company’s sales during the quarter.  Three customers accounted for aggregate sales of 30.7% for the six months ended, June 30, 2010, or 18.6%, 7.0%, and 5.1% respectively.  The Company had two customers that each accounted for 14% of the Company’s sales for the six months ended June 30, 2009.  Accounts receivable primarily consist of trade receivables and amounts due from state agencies and utilities for rebates on solar systems installed.  At June 30, 2010, the Company had two customers that accounted for 43.9% and 19.8% of the Company’s accounts receivable.  At December 31, 2009, the Company had two customers that accounted for 22.9% and 10.9% of the Company’s accounts receivable.  The Company monitors account balances and follows up with accounts that are past due as defined in the terms of the contract with the customer. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based on the expected collectability of its accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on assessments of the collectability of specific customer accounts and the aging of the accounts receivable. If there is a deterioration of a major customer’s credit worthiness or actual defaults are higher than historical experience, the allowance for doubtful accounts is increased. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.2 million and $0.1 million as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
 
The Company purchases its solar modules from a limited number of suppliers but believes that in the event it is unable to purchase solar panels from these suppliers that alternative sources of solar modules will be available.
 
 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Significant estimates include revenue recognition and derivative instruments, allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of goodwill, warranty reserves, the estimated useful life of property and equipment, valuation of the contingent consideration liability and derivative instrument, and income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand or in the bank and short-term investment securities with remaining maturities of 90 days or less at date of purchase. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts that, at times, may exceed the statutory insured limits of the jurisdiction in which the accounts are held.  The Company has not experienced any losses on these investments.  At June 30, 2010, the Company had $0.9 million in cash in bank accounts in excess of the various deposit insurance limits of the jurisdictions in which the balances were held.
 
Inventories – Inventories, consisting of raw materials and finished goods, are recorded using the average cost method and are carried at the lower of cost or market.
 
Property and Equipment – Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 5 years, or in the case of leasehold improvements, the lease term, if shorter. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as they occur.  Upon disposition, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and the resulting gain or loss is reflected in current operations.
 
Stock-Based Compensation – The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718 (Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” ), which requires the Company to measure the stock-based compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant date fair value and generally recognizes the costs in the financial statements over the employee’s requisite service period.  Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted was based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 718.
 
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets – The Company does not amortize goodwill, but rather tests goodwill for impairment at least annually. We determine the fair value using a weighted market and income approach. Under the income approach, we calculate the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Under the market approach, we calculate the fair value of the reporting unit using selected comparable companies’ revenue multiples and apply an average of such companies’ multiples to the Company’s revenue. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets including goodwill assigned to that unit, goodwill is not impaired. If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s net assets including goodwill exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then we determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then an impairment of goodwill has occurred and we recognize an impairment of loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the implied fair value of goodwill as a component of operating income. In the second quarter of 2010, due to the reduction in forecasted revenue since the purchase of our Italian operations, the Company performed an impairment test of the goodwill recorded from the acquisition of Rupinvest, which totaled $10 million at June 30, 2010. The Company's testing approach utilized a discounted cash flow analysis and comparative market multiples to determine the entity's (single reporting unit) fair value for comparison to its carrying value.  We did not recognize any goodwill impairment charges for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.  Intangible assets, consisting of a customer list, trademarks, and an employee contract, are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 2-17 years.
 
F-7

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The carrying value reported for cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, other receivables, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximated their respective fair values at each balance sheet date due to the short-term maturity of these financial instruments.  The fair values of the contingent consideration liability and our borrowings have been determined in accordance with the methodology as disclosed in Notes 12 and 16.
 
Revenue Recognition – Revenue on solar power projects installed by the Company for customers under installation contracts is recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting. At the end of each period, the Company measures the cost incurred on each project and compares the result against its estimated total costs at completion. The percent of cost incurred determines the amount of revenue to be recognized. Payment terms are generally defined by the installation contract and as a result may not match the timing of the costs incurred by the Company and the related recognition of revenue. Such differences are recorded as either costs or estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts or billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts. The Company determines a customer’s credit worthiness at the time an order is accepted. Sudden and unexpected changes in a customer’s financial condition could put recoverability at risk.
 
Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs attributable to a project as well as certain indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs, and depreciation costs. Selling, general, and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Profit incentives are included in revenues when their realization is reasonably assured.
 
The percentage of completion method requires the ability to estimate several factors, including the ability of the customer to meet its obligations under the contract, including the payment of amounts when due. If we determine that collectability is not assured, we will defer revenue recognition and use methods of accounting for the contract such as completed contract method until such time we determine that collectability is reasonably assured or through the completion of the project.
 
The Company recognized revenue on a percentage of completion basis on a 1 megawatt solar project in Italy in 2009 and in 2010 as the project was being completed.  The Company completed the project in May 2010 and invoiced the customer in accordance with the related contract.  Subsequently, the customer informed the Company that it intended to resell the project, however the buyer requested that the Company enter into an operating and maintenance (O&M) contract for the solar facility and wanted to purchase the project from the Company in its role as the builder.  The Company agreed to retake title to the project and transfer it to the buyer.  The Company did not receive any additional compensation for the transaction, took on a minimal increase in its warranty exposure that was limited to the de minimis amount of fees of the O&M contract, and did not assume other obligations with its assumption and passage of title to the buyer contemporaneously in June 2010.  Prior to June 2010, there was no agreement to enter into this transaction and payment of the original contract amount was not contingent on the sale to the buyer.  In July 2010, the Company received full payment for the total outstanding accounts receivable, which equals the original contract amount.  The Company determined the assumption of title and sale did not cause a change in the previous accounting recognition, and accordingly there was no effect on the accompanying financial statements.
 
Revenue related to distribution sales is recognized when we have received either a purchase order or contract, product is delivered to the customer or a third party shipper takes possession, the title and risk of ownership have passed to the buyer, and we determine that collection is probable.  The Company considers the risk of ownership to have passed when the customer has assumed the risk of loss.
 
Advertising – The Company expenses advertising costs as they are incurred.  Advertising costs were $0.1 million and $0.2 million the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  Advertising costs were $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  
 
 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
Product Warranties – The Company warrants its projects for labor and materials associated with its installations.  The Company’s warranty is ten years in California and generally five to ten years elsewhere in the U.S. depending upon each state’s specific requirements.  Premier Power Italy provides a ten year warranty covering the labor and materials associated with its installations.  Premier Power Spain provides a one year warranty for all contracts signed after December 31, 2006.  Since the Company does not have sufficient historical data to estimate its exposure, we have looked to our historical data and the historical data reported by a peer company solar system installer.  Solar panels and inverters are warranted by the manufacturer for 25 years and 10 years, respectively.  Activity in the Company’s accrued warranty reserve for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
 
   
Three Months
Ended June 30,
   
Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(in thousands)
   
(in thousands)
 
Beginning accrued warranty balance
  $ 355     $ 332     $ 359     $ 367  
                                 
Accruals related to warranties issued during period
    10       20       33       133  
                                 
Reduction for labor payments and claims made under warranty
    (14 )     (85 )     (41 )     (233 )
                                 
Ending accrued warranty balance
  $ 351     $ 267     $ 351     $ 267  
 
For certain European solar projects, we enter into warranties for the performance of a solar system upon completion of the project.  We warrant that the solar system will perform at certain performance ratios based on the energy generated versus irradian c e levels.  Our exposure under these warranties is currently limited to the amount of fees we are to receive for performing maintenance services over a limited period of time (usually two years) and that would be forgone by us in the event the system did not p erform as expected.  To date, we have not incurred lost revenue under these arrangements, and the total of future revenues subject to forfeiture is not material.
 
Foreign Currency – The functional currency of Premier Power Italy and Premier Power Spain is the Euro. Their assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates including goodwill, except for certain non-monetary balances, which are translated at historical rates. All income and expense amounts of Premier Power Italy and Premier Power Spain are translated at average exchange rates for the respective period. Translation gains and losses are not included in determining net income but are accumulated in a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in the determination of net income (loss) in the period in which they occur. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the foreign currency transaction gain (loss) was $(0.1) million and $(0.03) million, respectively.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the foreign currency transaction gain was $0.04 million and $0.08 million, respectively.
 
F-9

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
Comprehensive Income – FASB ASC Topic 220 (Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, “ Reporting Comprehensive Income ,”) establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income and its components in a financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other financial statements. Comprehensive income, as defined, includes all changes in equity during the period from non-owner sources, such as foreign currency translation adjustments.
 
Income Taxes – The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax reporting bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the weight of available evidence, including expected future earnings. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.   The Company has a valuation allowance for its net deferred tax asset associated with its U.S. operations.  Prior to September 2008, the Company was not subject to federal income tax.  
 
Effective September 1, 2008, the Company adopted FASB ASC 740-10 (Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation FIN No. 48, “ Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48)) . FASB ASC 740-10 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a company’s income tax return and provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.  As a result of the implementation of FASB ASC 740-10, the Company recognized no change in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions taken in prior periods and no corresponding change in retained earnings.   As a result of the implementation of FASB ASC 740-10, the Company recognized no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits as of the September 2008 adoption date and at December 31, 2009. Also, the Company had no amounts of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect its effective tax rate.
 
Premier Power Italy is organized under the laws of Italy and is subject to federal and provincial taxes.  Premier Power Spain is organized under the laws of Spain and is subject to federal and provincial taxes.  
 
Contingent Consideration Liability In connection with the acquisition of Rupinvest, contingent consideration liability of approximately $12 million was recorded at the time of the purchase. The contingent consideration liability relates to the contingent issuance of 3 million shares to the sellers of Rupinvest. In accordance with FASB ASC 820, the Company estimates the fair value of the contingent consideration liability at each reporting period, with changes in the estimated fair value recorded in income.
 
The fair value measurement assumes that the contingent consideration liability is transferred to a market participant at the valuation date and that the nonperformance risk related to the contingent consideration liability remains constant. The Company estimates the fair value using the market price of its shares since it believes this represents the present value of its future stock returns, discounted at the Company’s required rate of return. The Company also estimates the number of shares to be issued based on a number of financial scenarios weighted based on their relative probability. The Company considers the effect of counterparty performance risk in its fair value estimate. The Company estimates the counterparty performance risk by comparing its borrowing rate to those of U.S. treasury notes and uses the underlying spread to discount the estimated fair value.
 
Reclassifications   Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period balances to conform to the  current presentation.
 
F-10

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
 
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820) Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASU 2010-06) to add additional disclosures about the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, the valuation techniques and inputs used, the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3. Levels 1, 2 and 3 of fair value measurements are defined in Note 16 below. We are currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption on our consolidated financial statements.
 
In February 2010, the FASB issued an update to Subsequent Events (ASC 855) ,   which amends the previous definition of an SEC filer and removed the requirement that an SEC filer disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements.  Subsequent Events defines the period after the balance sheet date that entities should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements and establishes the circumstances under which entities should recognize and the disclosures that should be made about events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. The Company adopted this guidance with no material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
 
In April 2010, the FASB issued an update to Compensation-Stock Compensation (ASC 718) ,   which clarifies that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity shares trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if the award otherwise qualifies as equity.  The standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010 and should be applied prospectively. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 810 (SFAS No. 167, “ Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” ). FASB ASC 810 applies to FASB ASC 105 entities and is effective for annual financial periods beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within those years. Earlier application is prohibited. A calendar year-end company must adopt this statement as of January 1, 2010. The Company adopted this guidance with no material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
 
F-11


PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 860 (SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” ). FASB ASC 860 applies to all entities and is effective for annual financial periods beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within those years. Earlier application is prohibited. A calendar year-end company must adopt this statement as of January 1, 2010. This statement retains many of the criteria of FASB ASC 860 (FASB 140, “ Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities” ) to determine whether a transfer of financial assets qualifies for sale accounting, but there are some significant changes as discussed in the statement. Its disclosure and measurement requirements apply to all transfers of financial assets occurring on or after the effective date. Its disclosure requirements, however, apply to transfers that occurred both before and after the effective date. In addition, because FASB ASC 860 eliminates the consolidation exemption for Qualifying Special Purpose Entities, a company will have to analyze all existing QSPEs to determine whether they must be consolidated under FASB ASC 810. The Company adopted this guidance with no material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
 
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-05, “ Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value . ”  ASU 2009-05 applies to all entities that measure liabilities at fair value within the scope of FASB ASC 820, “ Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures . ”  ASU 2009-05 is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance, October 1, 2009 for the Company. The Company adopted this guidance with no material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
 
In August 2009, an update was made to Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures –Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value.”  This update permits entities to measure the fair value of liabilities, in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, using a valuation technique that uses a quoted price of an identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets or the income or market approach that is consistent with the principles of Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.   Effective upon issuance, the Company adopted this guidance with no material impact to our consolidated financial statements. 
 
In October 2009, the FASB ratified FASB ASC 605-25 (the EITF’s final consensus on Issue 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” ). FASB ASC 605-25 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Earlier adoption is permitted on a prospective or retrospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its consolidated financial statements.
 
3.           EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
Earnings per share is computed in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 260 (SFAS No. 128, “ Earnings Per Share ”). Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, as adjusted for the dilutive effect of the Company’s outstanding convertible preferred shares using the “if converted” method and dilutive potential common shares. Potentially dilutive securities include convertible preferred stock, employee stock options, restricted shares, and contingently issuable shares for the purchase of Rupinvest.  Potentially dilutive common shares from employee incentive plans are determined by applying the treasury stock method to the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock.
 
F-12

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
 
   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(in thousands, except per share data)
   
(in thousands, except per share data)
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 727     $ (259 )   $ (79 )   $ 462  
Earnings (loss) per share:
                               
           Basic
  $ 0.03     $ (0.01 )   $ (0.00 )   $ 0.02  
           Diluted
  $ 0.02     $ (0.01 )   $ (0.00 )   $ 0.02  
Weighted average shares outstanding:
                               
          Basic
    26,602       26,049       26,582       26,049  
          Diluted effect of convertible preferred stock, series A
    3,500       -       -       3,500  
          Diluted effect of convertible preferred stock, series B
    2,800       -       -       218  
          Diluted effect of warrants, Series A and B
    -       -       -       490  
          Diluted
    32,902       26,049       26,582       30,257  
 
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, there were issued and outstanding stock options exercisable for an aggregate 2,051,229 and 1,142,479 shares of common stock, respectively, that were anti-dilutive as their weighted average exercise price exceeded the average market price of the Company’s common stock.  For the three months ended June 30, 2009, there were 6,300,000 of potentially dilutive shares of common stock excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as their effect was anti-dilutive.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, there were 6,300,000 of potentially dilutive shares of common stock excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as their effect was anti-dilutive.
 
4.             INTANGIBLE ASSETS
 
Intangibles consist of amortizing intangibles and goodwill.  At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, such amounts were as follows:
 
   
June 30, 2010
   
December 31, 2009
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Trademark
  $ 788     $ 814  
Customer List
    61       89  
Employee contract
    22       67  
      871       970  
Goodwill
    10,508       12,254  
    $ 11,379     $ 13,224  
 
 
Amortization periods for the intangibles are as follows: trademark – 17 years, customer list – 3 years, and employee contract – 2 years. Amortization for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $0.04 million and $0.09 million, respectively.  Amortization for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was $0.06 million and $0.1 million, respectively.   Accumulated amortization was $0.3 million and $0.3 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The change of $1.7 million in goodwill as of June 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009 was the result of changes in foreign currency translation rates.
 
F-13

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
The Company expects amortization expense for the next five years to be as follows (in thousands):
 
Year
 
Amount
 
2010
  $ 150  
2011
  $ 81  
2012
  $ 69  
2013
  $ 52  
2014
  $ 52  
 
 
5.             PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
 
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
 
   
June 30, 2010
   
December 31, 2009
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Equipment
  $ 248     $ 217  
Furniture and computers
    200       204  
Vehicles
    571       651  
      1,019       1,072  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (507 )     (457 )
    $ 512     $ 615  
 
 
Depreciation expense was $0.05 million and $0.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  Depreciation expense was $0.04 million and $0.08 million for three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
 
6.             ACCRUED LIABILITIES
 
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
 
   
June 30, 2010
   
December 31, 2009
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Sales and local taxes
  $ 501     $ 176  
Payroll
    467       363  
Accrued subcontractors
    455       998  
Warranty reserve
    351       359  
Other operational accruals
    177       147  
    $ 1,951     $ 2,043  
 
F-14

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
 
7.           INCOME TAXES
 
The effective tax rate for the periods presented is the result of the mix of income earned in various tax jurisdictions that apply a broad range of income tax rates.  Our provision for income taxes differs from the tax computed at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate due primarily to state taxes, earnings considered as indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations, and changes in the valuation allowance and fair values of the contingent consideration liability and financial instruments.
 
Our net deferred tax assets decreased from $1.8 million as of December 31, 2009 to $0.2 million as of June 30, 2010 primarily as a result of the Company recognizing a valuation allowance of $1.4 million mainly related to net operating loss carry forwards in the U.S. The valuation allowance was recorded as a result of delays in the execution and signing of certain construction contracts, and we believe based on current U.S. operations that it has become more likely than not that we will be unable to realize our U.S. net operating loss carry forwards.
 
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions.  The Company adopted the provisions of accounting for uncertain tax positions in accordance with the Income Taxes (ASC 740) topic on September 8, 2008, and accordingly, performed a comprehensive review of the Company’s uncertain tax positions as of that date.  In this regard, an uncertain tax position represents its expected treatment of a tax position taken in a filed tax return, or planned to be taken in a future tax return, that has not been reflected in measuring income tax expense for financial reporting purposes.   
 
The Company does not expect there to be any material changes to the assessment of uncertain tax positions over the next twelve months.  The Company is subject to routine corporate income tax audits in the United States and foreign jurisdictions.  The statute of limitations for the Company’s 2008 tax years remains open for U.S. purposes.  Most foreign jurisdictions have statute of limitations that range from three to six years.
 
The liability for uncertain tax positions is recorded in accrued expenses in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.  The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the income tax provision.  Interest and penalties are computed based upon the difference between its uncertain tax positions under ASC 740 and the amount deducted or expected to be deducted in its tax returns.  During 2009 and 2008, the Company did not accrue or pay for any interest and penalties.
 
8.             BORROWINGS
 
Notes Payable
 
Notes payable were $0.6 million and $0.6 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.  Notes payable of $0.07 million are secured by vehicles and have maturities through 2014.  Additionally, we have $0.02 million short term unsecured notes associated with various insurance policies.  The annual interest rates on the notes range from 2.9% to 6.4%. Premier Power Spain has two unsecured loans totaling $0.5 million with Instituto de Crédito Oficial as of June 30, 2010, with the first payment due on December 18, 2010 for one of the loans with each additional payment due six months thereafter until June 18, 2012, which is the due date of the last payment on this loan, and with the other loan due on June 18, 2011.  Payment amounts are $0.1 million each.
 
F-15

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
 
Lines of Credit
 
On July 13, 2009, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Umpqua Bank, an Oregon corporation, for a line of credit of up to $12 million, maturing on July 13, 2011.  The loan agreement provides for an initial line of credit of $7 million, provided, however, that the Company may request no more than twice prior to the maturity date that the line of credit be increased to an amount not to exceed $12 million in the event the Company acquires another subsidiary and require additional working capital for such subsidiary.  The line of credit is secured by the Parent’s assets and by the assets of Premier Power California and Bright Future.  The line of credit bears interest at the prime rate, provided, however, that the interest rate will not be less than five percent (5%) per annum.  At June 30, 2010, the interest rate was 5%. As of June 30, 2010, there was $1.4 million outstanding under the agreement with Umpqua Bank.  Additionally, certain financial ratios under the agreement with Umpqua Bank restricts the amount that we can borrow.
 
The loan agreement with Umpqua Bank contains the following financial condition covenants:  (i) minimum debt service charge, (ii) minimum current ratio, (iii) maximum debt-to-tangible net worth ratio, and (iv) minimum tangible net worth.  Under the loan agreement, the Company is also subject to customary non-financial covenants including limitations on secured indebtedness and limitations on dividends and other restricted payments.  As of June 30, 2010, the Company was out of compliance with the minimum current ratio, the maximum debt-to-tangible net worth ratio, and the minimum tangible net worth ratio.  The bank is aware of the non-compliance and has not waived the non-compliance.  The bank has indicated that it does not intend to issue a notice of default, nor institute default rates, nor cut funding under the line.  We are in discussions with the bank to redefine the financial covenants; in the event, however, that the bank does subject the Company to default provisions, our interest rate would increase to 5% above the then-current rate and our ability to borrow would be limited.  Additionally, the bank has the right to request repayment of all outstanding obligations.  We believe that our current cash balances and the anticipated increase from operating cash flows resulting from increased collections from accounts receivable, extended payment terms on certain of our accounts payable, our backlog, and our expected realization of our costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts, as of June 30, 2010, are sufficient to meet working capital needs should the bank issue a notice of default and demand repayment of all obligations or cut off funding under the line.  We do not expect any of these events to occur, though, and believe we have the ability to comply with these covenants once the financial covenants are redefined.  Without the redefinition of terms, we are unable to comply with the current ratios with which we are out of compliance.    
 
At June 30, 2010, Premier Power Spain had an unsecured line of credit for $0.1 million, which has interest terms of Euribor+3.25 and is due in full on August 1, 2011.  As of June 30, 2010, there was $0.03 million outstanding on the line.
 
The future principle payments on these balances as of June 30, 2010 are as follows:
 
   
(in thousands)
 
2010
  $ 1,658  
2011
    270  
2012
    62  
2013
    5  
2014
    2  
    $ 1,997  
 
F-16

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
9.           EQUITY
 
Preferred Stock
 
The Company has authorized 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $ 0.0001 per share (“Preferred Stock”). The Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in series having such designated preferences and rights and qualifications and to such limitations as the Board of Directors may determine.
 
The Company has designated 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Stock”).  The holders of Series A Stock have no voting rights except with regards to certain corporate events, enjoys a $2.40 liquidation preference per share, subject to adjustment, over holders of common stock, and may convert each share of Series A Stock into one share of common stock at any time.  Series A stock converts automatically upon the occurrence of an offering meeting certain criteria.  Holders of the Series A Stock have certain redemption rights.  The Company has determined that the events triggering such rights are either in control of the Company or in the case of such events where the Company is not deemed to exercise control; the redemption right is limited to the ability to convert into shares of the Company’s common stock.  As of June 30, 2010 and 2009, there were 3,500,000 shares of Series A Stock outstanding.
 
The Company has designated 2,800,000 shares of Preferred Stock as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Stock”).  The holders of Series B Stock have no voting rights except with regards to certain corporate events and may convert each share of Series B Stock into one share of common stock at any time. Series B stock converts automatically upon the occurrence of an offering meeting certain criteria.  Holders of the Series B Stock have certain redemption rights.  The Company has determined that the events triggering such rights are either in control of the Company or in the case of such events where the Company is not deemed to exercise control; the redemption right is limited to the ability to convert into shares of the Company’s common stock.  As of June 30, 2010 and 2009, there were 2,800,000 shares of Series B Stock outstanding.
 
Warrants
 
In September 2008, the Company issued 3,500,000 units, consisting each of 1 share of Series A Stock, ½ of a Series A Warrant, and ½ of a Series B Warrant, in exchange for $7,000,000 in gross proceeds.  Both the Series A and B Warrants had four year lives. The Company had the right to call for cancellation of each outstanding Series A Warrant or Series B Warrant under certain circumstances. The Series A Warrants had an exercise price of $2.50 and a fair value of $.15 per warrant. The Series B Warrants had an exercise price of $3.00 and a fair value of $.13 per warrant. All of the issued and outstanding Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants were cancelled on June 16, 2009 in connection with a sale of our Series B Stock.
 
The significant assumptions used to determine the fair values of the warrants are as follows:
 
Risk-free interest rate at grant date
4.5 %
 
Expected stock price volatility
95 %
 
Expected dividend payout
-
 
Expected option life
4 yrs
 
 
 
The fair value of the Series A Stock was calculated based on the estimated fair value and underlying number of common shares it would convert into at the time of the transaction. The estimated fair value of our common stock on the transaction date was $.42 per share, and the Series A Stock would have converted into 3,500,000 shares of common stock, thus deriving a fair value of $1,475,000 for the underlying common stock.
     
F-17

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
10.           RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
Certain stockholders have guaranteed certain obligations under the Company’s borrowings and operating leases.  Premier Power Italy purchased $0.06 million of furniture and office equipment from a company related to an executive officer of Premier Power Italy.  Premier Power Italy also retained a relative of an executive officer on a contract basis to perform design services.  This relative was paid $0.02 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  In addition, an executive officer has contracted with the Company for a residential solar system.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company has recognized minimal revenue and cost from this contract.  The total contract value is for $0.05 million.
    
  11.             COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
Premier Power Spain is party to four non-cancelable leases for operating facilities in Navarro, Madrid, and Barcelona, Spain, and Prague in the Czech Republic, which expire in 2011 through 2014.  Premier Power Italy is party to a non-cancelable lease for operating facilities in Campobasso, Italy, which expires in 2015.  Premier Power California is party to a non-cancelable lease for operating facilities in Redlands and Anaheim, California, which expires in 2010 and 2013, respectively.  Additionally, the Company is renting an apartment for an employee pursuant to his employment agreement; this lease is non-cancelable and expires in 2011.  These leases provide for annual rent increases tied to the Consumer Price Index. The leases require the following payments as of June 30, 2010, subject to annual adjustment, if any:
 
   
(in thousands)
 
2010
  $ 62  
2011
    112  
2012
    96  
2013
    83  
2014
    29  
Thereafter
    16  
    $ 398  
 
In May 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a reseller.  Under the agreement, the Company pays $1,000 per month, with the first 6 months of fees waived.  Additionally, the Company provides the reseller a margin of 5%-6% on sales of its products by the reseller.  The agreement expires in May 2011, unless renewed. 
 
We are not currently involved in any material legal proceedings, and we are not aware of any material legal proceedings pending or threatened against us. We are also not aware of any material legal proceedings involving any of our directors, officers, or affiliates or any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities.
 
 
In connection with the acquisition of Rupinvest, contingent consideration liability of approximately $12.0 million was recorded at the time of the purchase to reflect the estimated fair value of 3 million contingently issuable shares of the Company’s common stock.
 
F-18

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
The conditions that must be met and the amount of the 3 million shares, if any, to be issued are described below:
 
(i)
375,000 shares for each ten million Euros ( € 10 million, or approximately $14.2 million) worth of net sales (as defined) achieved by Premier Power Italy from July 9, 2009, the escrow opening date, to December 31, 2009 (the “First Issuance ”), with the maximum number of shares released as part of the First Issuance to be 1,500,000 shares (any number of shares not issuable as part of the First Issuance solely due to the fact that the 1,500,000 shares threshold was exceeded is hereinafter referred to as the “ Excess Issuable Amount ” );
 
(ii)
50% of the Excess Issuable Amount, if any, plus 200,000 shares for each ten million Euros ( € 10 million, or approximately $14.2 million) worth of net sales achieved by Premier Power Italy from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 (the “Second Issuance) ”). The maximum combined number of shares to be released as part of the First Issuance and the Second Issuance, in the aggregate, shall not exceed 3,000,000 shares; and
 
(iii)
100,000 shares for each ten million Euros ( € 10 million, or approximately $14.2 million) worth of net sales achieved by Premier Power Italy from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 (the “Third Issuance ”). The maximum combined number of shares to be released as part of the First Issuance, the Second Issuance, and the Third issuance, in the aggregate, shall not exceed 3,000,000 shares.
 
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration liability at $1.9 million and $7.7 million, respectively, assuming 1,422,100 and 2,801,875 shares of its common stock, respectively, would be issued, a share price of $1.40 and $2.75, respectively, transaction costs, and an adjustment for counterparty performance risk.  As of June 30, 2010, the Company estimated the amount of shares by the seller was approximately 502,100 for period ended December 31, 2009, but no such shares have yet been distributed as the Company and seller are finalizing the application of the conditions to the 2009 results. The Company does not expect the final number of shares to be issued for 2009 to materially differ from its current estimate.
 
13.           DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENT
 
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASC 815 ( EITF 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock) . As part of the adoption of FASB ASC 815, the Company determined that its warrants are not indexed to its stock as a result of the basis of an exercise price reset that occurs when the Company sells its common stock at a lower price, even if such price is at fair value. Thus, the value of the warrants has been recorded as a liability.
 
The Company recorded a warrant liability in the amount of $11.1 million upon adoption of FASB ASC 815.  The liability was then adjusted to fair value, $9.6 million as of March 31, 2009 and $8.9 million as of June 30, 2009.  As a result of the changes in fair value, the Company recorded income of $0.7 million and $2.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
 
The Company recorded the following cumulative effect of change in accounting principle pursuant to its adoption of EITF 07-05 as of January 1, 2009:
 
   
Other
   
Other
       
   
Paid-In-
   
Current
   
Retained
 
   
Capital
   
Liability
   
Earnings
 
         
(in thousands)
       
Record January 1, 2009, derivative instrument liability related to warrants
  $ -     $ 11,119     $ -  
Record January 1, 2009, the reversal of prior accounting related warrants
    (1,794 )     -       (9,325.00 )
    $ (1,794 )   $ 11,119     $ (9,325 )
 
F-19

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
The Company used the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate fair value of its warrant liability.  Key assumptions used are as follows:
 
Number of Shares
included in
Warrant
  
Dividend Yield
  
  
Volatility
  
  
Risk-Free
Rate
  
  
Expected Life
(in years)
  
  
Stock Price
  
  
  
                             
1,750,000
 
0.0
%
 
95.0
%
 
4.5
%
 
4.0
   
$
2.50
 
                                 
1,750,000
 
0.0
%
 
95.0
%
 
4.5
%
 
4.0
   
$
3.00
 
 
 
14.           STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE AND VALUATION OF STOCK OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED STOCK-BASED AWARDS
 
The Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) provides for the issuance of incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options. The board of directors determines to whom grants are made and the vesting, timing, amounts, and other terms of such grants, subject to the terms of the Incentive Plan. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees of the Company, while non-statutory stock options may be granted to the Company’s employees, officers, directors, certain consultants, and certain advisors. Options under the Incentive Plan vest as determined by the Board.  The term of the options granted under the Incentive Plan may not exceed 10 years, and the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to stock options and stock awards granted under the Incentive Plan is 2,951,875 shares in the aggregate. The Company granted 126,500 and 728,500 options in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  An aggregate of 2,226,729 stock options and awards (net of forfeitures) were committed under the Incentive Plan as of June 30, 2010.  
 
Restricted stock awards granted under the Incentive Plan are independent of option grants and are subject to restrictions.  Awards, which have been issued since 2009, are subject to forfeiture if employment or services are terminated prior to the release of restrictions, which generally occurs on a ratable basis over three to four years from the date of grant.  The cost of the awards, determined to be the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant, is expensed ratably over the period the restriction lapse.  At June 30, 2010 and 2009, there were an aggregate of 175,500 and 150,000, respectively, restricted stock awards unissued and unvested.
 
Stock-based compensation is included in the following operating expense line items in our consolidated statement of operations:
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Cost of sales
  $ 61     $ 47     $ 150     $ 93  
Sales and marketing
    41       30       66       61  
General and administrative
    135       67       266       136  
    $ 237     $ 144     $ 482     $ 290  
 
 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
We estimate the fair value of our stock option grants using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, which was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable.  Option valuation models, including the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, require the input of assumptions, including stock price volatility.  Changes in the input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates and ultimately how much we recognize as stock-based compensation expense.  The fair values of our stock options were estimated at the date of grant.  The weighted average input assumptions used and resulting fair values were as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009: 
 
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Expected volatitity
    90.98 %     93.60 %
Expected dividend
    0 %     0 %
Expected term
 
6.4 years
 
6.5 years
Risk-free interest rate
    0.15 %     1.88 %
Weighted-average fair value per share
  $ 2.57   $ 3.32
 
Valuation and Amortization Method — The estimated fair value of stock options is amortized over the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period. Stock options typically have a ten-year life from date of grant and vesting periods of three to five years. The fair value of the Company’s restricted stock award is based on its value as determined by market prices of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective vesting period.
 
 
Expected Dividend — The Company has never paid dividends on its common shares and currently does not intend to do so.  Accordingly, the dividend yield percentage is zero for all periods.
 
Expected Term — The Company’s expected term represents the period that the Company’s stock options are expected to be outstanding. For awards granted subject only to service vesting requirements, the Company utilizes the simplified method under the provisions of FASB ASC 718-10-S99-1 (Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107) for estimating the expected term of the stock options.
 
Risk-Free Interest Rate — The Company bases the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation method upon the implied yield curve currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.
 
  15.           EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
 
The Company has a 401(k) Plan for its United States employees. Employees are eligible to make contributions when they attain an age of twenty-one and have completed at least one year of service. The Company makes discretionary matching contributions to employees who qualify for the Plan and were employed on the last day of the Plan year. Such contributions totaled $0 and $12 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.   The contributions was zero for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.  Employees are vested 100% after 3 years of service.  Bright Future, Premier Power Italy, and Premier Power Spain do not offer defined contribution or defined benefit plans to employees.
 
F-21

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
16.           FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability.  In accordance with  FASB ASC 820 (SAS No. 157 Fair Value Measurements) , the Company uses fair value measurements based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), significant other observable inputs (Level 2), or unobservable inputs for assets or liabilities (Level 3), depending on the nature of the item being valued.  
 
The following disclosure is made in accordance with FASB ASC 820 (FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 107-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments ): The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings, accounts payable, billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts, and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values at each balance sheet date due to the short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The fair value of the Company’s borrowings approximates their carrying values, either as a result of their short term nature or their terms.
 
FASB ASC 820 (SFAS No. 157) defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  FASB ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy, as defined below, gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.
 
 
Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
 
 
Level 2, defined as observable inputs other than Level 1 prices.  They include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in a market that is not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
 
 
Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
 
The table below sets forth the Company’s Level 3 financial assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value:
 
   
June 30, 2010
   
December 31, 2009
 
   
(in thousands)
   
(in thousands)
 
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
 
Liabilities: Contingent consideration
  $ -     $ -     $ 1,949     $ -     $ -     $ 7,725  
 
 
   
Contingent
 
   
Consideration
 
   
Liability
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Beginning balance
 
      $
7,725
 
Total gain recognized
   
     5,776
 
Ending balance
 
      $
     1,949
 
 
F-22

 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
  (unaudited)
 
 
17.           CONTINGENCIES
 
Legal Matters
 
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business.  The Company is not currently involved in any litigation, the outcome of which would, based on information currently available, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
 
Indemnifications
 
The Company indemnifies its directors and executive officers for costs associated with any fees, expenses, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by them in any action or proceeding to which any of them is, or is threatened to be, made a party by reason of his or her services in their role as a director or officer.
 
18.           SEGMENT INFORMATION
 
The Company has adopted Segment Reporting (ASC 280) requiring segmentation based on the Company’s internal organization, reporting of revenue and other performance measures.  Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which discrete financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.  The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief Executive Officer.  The Company’s segments are designed to allocate resources internally and provide a framework to determine management responsibility.  There are three operating segments, as summarized below:
 
 
·
United States – consists of (i) commercial ground mount or rooftop solar energy projects generally ranging from 100kWh to 20MW provided to corporate, municipal, agricultural, and utility customers and (ii) residential that consists mainly of rooftop solar installations generally ranging from 5kWh to 40KWh provided to residential customers primarily in California and New Jersey.
 
 
·
Italy – consists of distribution, ground mount, roof mount, and solar power plant installations.
 
 
·
Spain – consists of rooftop solar installations generally ranging 5kWh to 1MW provided primarily to businesses that own commercial buildings or warehouse and distribution and engineering, procurement, and construction of ground mount, and solar power plant systems.
 
 Prior to its acquisition of Premier Power Italy, the Company determined that it operated as a single segment. In conjunction with the acquisition and changes in its management structure, the Company determined that the three operating segments noted above are more reflective of its operations.
 
The Company refers to the Net Sales as the revenue earned from the installation projects or distribution sales.  Currently, the Company does not separately allocate operating expenses to these segments, nor does it allocate specific assets to these segments.  Therefore, segment information reported includes only net sales, cost of sales, and gross profit.  The following tables present the operations by each operating segment:
 
F-23

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
  (unaudited )
 
 
   
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
   
United State s
   
Italy
   
Spain
   
Total
 
         
(in thousands)
       
Net sales
  $ 1,012     $ 3,381     $ 4,633     $ 9,026  
Cost of sales
    (1,162 )     (2,996 )     (4,418 )     (8,576 )
Gross (loss) profit
  $ (150 )   $ (385 )   $ 215       450  
Total operating expenses
                            2,292  
Operating loss
                          $ (1,842 )
                                 
                                 
           
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
 
           
United States
   
Spain
   
Total
 
             
(in thousands)
 
Net sales
          $ 3,085     $ 1,029     $ 4,114  
Cost of sales
            (2,648 )     (937 )     (3,585 )
Gross profit
          $ 437     $ 92       529  
Total operating expenses
                            1,982  
Operating loss
                          $ (1,453 )
                                 
                                 
     
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
   
United State s
   
Italy
   
Spain
   
Total
 
           
(in thousands)
         
Net sales
  $ 1,984     $ 4,306     $ 6,135     $ 12,425  
Cost of sales
    (2,347 )     (3,971 )     (5,625 )     (11,944 )
Gross (loss) profit
  $ (363 )   $ 335     $ 509       481  
Total operating expenses
                            4,693  
Operating loss
                          $ (4,212 )
 
F-24

 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
  (unaudited)
 
   
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
 
   
United States
   
Spain
   
Total
 
       
(in thousands)
       
Net sales
  $ 5,469     $ 3,439     $ 8,908  
Cost of sales
    (5,107 )     (2,904 )     (8,011 )
Gross profit
  $ 362     $ 535       897  
Total operating expenses
                    3,765  
Operating loss
                  $ (2,868 )
 
 
At June 30, 2010 and 2009, property and equipment located in the United States, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, was approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively.  At June 30, 2010 and 2009, property and equipment located in foreign countries, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, was approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
 
19.           SUBSEQUENT EVENT
 
In July 2010, we formed a new subsidiary, Premier Power Development, S.r.l., which is wholly owned by our wholly owned subsidiary, Rupinvest.  This subsidiary is organized under the laws of Italy and will supplement our Italian operations.
 
F-25

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
Forward-Looking Statements

The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of Premier Power Renewable Energy, Inc. should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in this report and the notes to those financial statements. References to “we,” “our,” or “us” in this section refers to the Company and its subsidiaries. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations, and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those included in the “Risk Factors” section of our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.


Overview

We are a developer, designer, and integrator of solar energy solutions. We develop, market, sell, and maintain solar energy systems for residential, agricultural, commercial, industrial customers in North America and Spain through Bright Future and Premier Power Spain, both of which are wholly owned subsidiaries of Premier Power California, which is our wholly owned subsidiary. We also distribute solar modules and develop and integrate ground mount and rooftop solar power systems in Italy through Premier Power Italy, the wholly owned subsidiary of Rupinvest, which is our wholly owned subsidiary. We use solar components from the solar industry’s leading suppliers and manufacturers such as GE, Sharp, Kyocera, Fronius, Watsun, and SunPower Corporation.  Our profitability is primarily dependent upon revenue from sales to commercial, governmental, residential, and equity fund customers.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported net sales and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, we believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical to aid the reader in fully understanding and evaluating this discussion and analysis:

Basis of Presentation – The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), and include the accounts of Premier Power Renewable Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries.  All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Inventories – Inventories, consisting of raw materials and finished goods, are recorded using the average cost method, and are carried at the lower of cost or market.

Stock-Based Compensation –   The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the provisions of  Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718 (Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” ), which requires the Company to measure the stock-based compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant date fair value and generally recognizes the costs in the financial statements over the employee’s requisite service period.  Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted was based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 718.
 
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets – The Company does not amortize goodwill, but rather tests goodwill for impairment at least annually. We determine the fair value of our reporting units using a weighted market and income approach. Under the income approach, we calculate the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Under the market approach, we calculate the fair value of the reporting unit using selected comparable companies’ revenue multiples and applying an average of such companies’ multiples to the Company’s revenue. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets including goodwill assigned to that unit, goodwill is not impaired. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then an impairment of goodwill has occurred and we recognize an impairment of loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the implied fair value of goodwill as a component of operating income. In the second quarter of 2010, due to the reduction in forecasted revenue since the purchase of our Italian operations, the Company performed an impairment test of the goodwill recorded from the acquisition of Rupinvest, which totaled $10 million at June 30, 2010. The Company's testing approach utilized a discounted cash flow analysis and comparative market multiples to determine the entity's (single reporting unit) fair value for comparison to its carrying value.  We did not recognize any goodwill impairment charges for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.  Intangible assets, consisting of a customer list, trademarks, and an employee contract, are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 2-17 years.

2

 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The carrying value reported for cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, other receivables, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximated their respective fair values at each balance sheet date due to the short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The fair value of the contingent consideration liability and our borrowings have been determined in accordance with the methodology as disclosed in the notes to our annual and interim consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition – Revenue on solar power projects installed by the Company for customers under installation contracts is recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting. At the end of each period, the Company measures the cost incurred on each project and compares the result against its estimated total costs at completion. The percent of cost incurred determines the amount of revenue to be recognized. Payment terms are generally defined by the installation contract and as a result may not match the timing of the costs incurred by the Company and the related recognition of revenue. Such differences are recorded as either costs or estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts or billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts. The Company determines a customer’s credit worthiness at the time an order is accepted. Sudden and unexpected changes in a customer’s financial condition could put recoverability at risk.

Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs attributable to a project as well as certain indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs, and depreciation costs. Selling, general, and administrative costs are charged to expense, as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Profit incentives are included in revenues when their realization is reasonably assured.

The percentage of completion method requires the ability to estimate several factors, including the ability of the customer to meet its obligations under the contract, including the payment of amounts when due. If we determine that collectability is not assured, we will defer revenue recognition and use methods of accounting for the contract such as completed contract method until such time we determine that collectability is reasonably assured or through the completion of the project.
 
The Company recognized revenue on a percentage of completion basis on a 1 megawatt solar project in Italy in 2009 and in 2010 as the project was being completed.  The Company completed the project in May 2010 and invoiced the customer in accordance with the related contract.  Subsequently, the customer informed the Company that it intended to resell the project, however the buyer requested that the Company enter into an operating and maintenance (O&M) contract for the solar facility and wanted to purchase the project from the Company in its role as the builder.  The Company agreed to retake title to the project and transfer it to the buyer.  The Company did not receive any additional compensation for the transaction, took on a minimal increase in its warranty exposure that was limited to the de minimis amount of fees of the O&M contract, and did not assume other obligations with its assumption and passage of title to the buyer contemporaneously in June 2010.  Prior to June 2010, there was no agreement to enter into this transaction and payment of the original contract amount was not contingent on the sale to the buyer.  In July 2010, the Company received full payment for the total outstanding accounts receivable, which equals the original contract amount.  The Company determined the assumption of title and sale did not cause a change in the previous accounting recognition, and accordingly there was no effect on the accompanying financial statements.
 
Revenue related to distribution sales is recognized when we have received either a purchase order or contract, product is delivered to the customer or a third party shipper takes possession, the title and risk of ownership have passed to the buyer, and we determine that collection is probable.  The Company considers the risk of ownership to have passed when the customer has assumed the risk of loss.
 
Product Warranties –  The Company warrants its projects for labor and materials associated with its installations.  The Company’s warranty is ten years in California and generally five to ten years elsewhere in the U.S., depending upon each state’s specific requirements.  Premier Power Italy provides a ten year warranty covering the labor and materials associated with its installations.  Premier Power Spain provides a one year warranty for all contracts signed after December 31, 2006.  Since the Company does not have sufficient historical data to estimate its exposure, we have looked to our historical data and the historical data reported by a peer company solar system installer. Solar panels and inverters are warranted by the manufacturer for 25 years and 10 years, respectively.

Income Taxes – The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax reporting bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the weight of available evidence, including expected future earnings. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.   The Company has a valuation allowance for its net deferred tax asset associated with its U.S. operations.  Prior to September 2008, the Company was not subject to federal income tax.

Effective September 1, 2008, the Company adopted FASB ASC 740-10 (Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation FIN No. 48, “ Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48)) . FASB ASC 740-10 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a company’s income tax return and provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. As a result of the implementation of FASB ASC 740-10, the Company recognized no change in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions taken in prior periods and no corresponding change in retained earnings. As a result of the implementation of FASB ASC 740-10, the Company recognized no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits as of the September 2008 adoption date and at December 31, 2009.  Also, the Company had no amounts of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect its effective tax rate

3

 
Premier Power Italy is organized under the laws of Italy and is subject to federal and provincial taxes.  Premier Power Spain is organized under the laws of Spain and is subject to federal and provincial taxes.

Contingent Consideration Liability – In connection with the acquisition of Rupinvest, contingent consideration liability of approximately $12 million was recorded at the time of the purchase. The contingent consideration liability relates to the contingent issuance of 3 million shares to the sellers of Rupinvest.   In accordance with FASB ASC 820 the Company estimates the fair value of the contingent consideration liability at each reporting period, with changes in the estimated fair value recorded in income.

The fair value measurement assumes that the contingent consideration liability is transferred to a market participant at the valuation date and that the nonperformance risk related to the contingent consideration liability remains constant. The Company estimates the fair value using the market price of its shares since it believes this represents the present value of its future stock returns, discounted at the Company’s required rate of return. The Company also estimates the number of shares to be issued based on a number of financial scenarios weighted based on their relative probability. The Company considers the effect of counterparty performance risk in its fair value estimate. The Company estimates the counterparty performance risk by comparing its borrowing rate to those of U.S. treasury notes and uses the underlying spread to discount the estimated fair value.
 
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820) Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASU 2010-06) to add additional disclosures about the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, the valuation techniques and inputs used, the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3. Levels 1, 2 and 3 of fair value measurements are defined in Note 16 of our annual consolidated financial statements. We are currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued an update to Subsequent Events (ASC 855) ,   which amends the previous definition of an SEC filer and removed the requirement that an SEC filer disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements.  Subsequent Events defines the period after the balance sheet date that entities should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements and establishes the circumstances under which entities should recognize and the disclosures that should be made about events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. The Company has adopted this guidance with no material impact to our consolidated financial statements.
 
In April 2010, the FASB issued an update to Compensation-Stock Compensation (ASC 718) ,   which clarifies that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity shares trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if the award otherwise qualifies as equity.  The standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010 and should be applied prospectively.  The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 810 (SFAS No. 167, “ Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” ). FASB ASC 810 applies to FASB ASC 105 entities and is effective for annual financial periods beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within those years. Earlier application is prohibited. A calendar year-end company must adopt this statement as of January 1, 2010.  The Company adopted this guidance with no material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 860 (SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” ). FASB ASC 860 applies to all entities and is effective for annual financial periods beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within those years. Earlier application is prohibited. A calendar year-end company must adopt this statement as of January 1, 2010. This statement retains many of the criteria of FASB ASC 860 (FASB 140, “ Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities” ) to determine whether a transfer of financial assets qualifies for sale accounting, but there are some significant changes as discussed in the statement. Its disclosure and measurement requirements apply to all transfers of financial assets occurring on or after the effective date. Its disclosure requirements, however, apply to transfers that occurred both before and after the effective date. In addition, because FASB ASC 860 eliminates the consolidation exemption for Qualifying Special Purpose Entities, a company will have to analyze all existing QSPEs to determine whether they must be consolidated under FASB ASC 810. The Company adopted this guidance with no material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

4

 
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-05, “ Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value .   ASU 2009-05 applies to all entities that measure liabilities at fair value within the scope of FASB ASC 820, “ Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures . ”  ASU 2009-05 is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance, October 1, 2009 for the Company. The Company has adopted this guidance with no material impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2009, an update was made to Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures –Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value.”   This update permits entities to measure the fair value of liabilities, in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, using a valuation technique that uses a quoted price of an identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets or the income or market approach that is consistent with the principles of Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  Effective upon issuance, the Company adopted this guidance with no material impact to our consolidated financial statements. 

In October 2009, the FASB ratified FASB ASC 605-25 (the EITF’s final consensus on Issue 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” ). FASB ASC 605-25 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Earlier adoption is permitted on a prospective or retrospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on its consolidated financial statements.
 

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

Our net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were $9.0 million, an increase of $4.9 million, or 119%, from the prior year period.  U.S. net sales were $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 67% from the prior year period.  Our Italian operations provided $3.4 million of net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2010.  There were no Italian operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009.  Spain’s net sales were $4.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $3.6 million, or 350% from the prior year period.

We had net income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 of $0.7 million, or $0.03 per share, compared to net loss of $(0.3) million, or $(0.01) per share, for three months ended June 30, 2009.  An adjustment to fair value of the contingent consideration liability of $4.5 million increased income by a similar amount for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and an increase in the valuation allowance for U.S. net deferred tax assets decreased net income by $1.4 million.  Net income included $0.7 million for the change in fair value of warrants for the three months ended June 30, 2009.  Cost of sales increased $5.0 million, or 139%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the prior year period.  Operating expenses increased by $0.3 million, or 16%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, as compared to the prior year period.


Sources of Revenue

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2010
   
2009
   
Change %
 
Net sales:
                 
United States
  $ 1,012     $ 3,085       (67 )%
Italy
    3,381       -       -  
Spain
    4,633       1,029       350 %
 
  $ 9,026     $ 4,114       119 %

Our net sales include revenue recognized under installation contracts using the percentage of completion method of accounting.  Additionally, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, we derived sales from our Italian business segment of $3.3 million primarily as result of distribution sales, which accounted for 99% of our total Italian revenue.  The addition of our Italian net sales is a result of the acquisition of our Italian subsidiary in the third quarter of 2009.     The decrease in net sales in the United States was largely the result of the financial crisis resulting in tightened lending and access to cash from banks for our customers, which slowed business development dramatically in the last year and produced decreased levels of available project finance.  We have begun to build a strong product pipeline and backlog in the U.S., and we have partnered with several Power Purchase Agreement providers and expect to have signed projects from these efforts in future quarters.  The increase in our Spanish segment is largely the result of collaboration with a Czech Republic company for distribution and engineering, procurement, and construction services on up to 19 megawatts of solar projects.  

5

 
Cost of sales

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2010
   
2009
   
Change %
 
Cost of Sales
                 
           United States
  $ 1,162     $ 2,648       (56 )%
           Italy
    2,996       -       -  
           Spain
    4,418       937       372 %
    $ 8,576     $ 3,585       139 %
                         
Share-based compensation included above
  $ 61     $ 47       30 %
Gross Margin Percentage
                       
           United States
    -14.8 %     14.2 %        
           Italy
    11.4 %     -          
           Spain
    4.6 %     8.9 %        
      5.0 %     12.9 %        

Cost of sales include all direct material and labor costs attributable to a project as well as certain indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs, and depreciation costs.  Cost of sales for the U.S. decreased $1.5 million, or 56%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the prior year period.  The decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in recognized sales.  U.S. gross margin decreased to negative 14.8% due to the insufficient volume of net sales to cover fixed operational costs and the increased competitive nature of the industry as a result of lower U.S. energy incentives.  The gross margin for our Italian operations was 11.4%.  Large scale solar projects have, in the past, contributed to our Italian gross margins, and none was recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2010.  Cost of sales for our Spanish operations increased $3.5 million, or 372%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the prior year period.  The increase was primarily the result of an increase in net sales of $1.0 million in distribution sales and $2.4 million in installation contracts.  The gross margin for our Spanish operations decreased to 4.6% due to entry into the Czech Republic market where initially we are primarily providing procurement, distribution, and engineering services, which generally have lower margins than those realized on our construction contracts.

Operating Expenses
 
   
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2010
   
2009
   
Change %
 
Sales and marketing expenses
  $ 771     $ 734       5 %
General and administrative expenses
  $ 1,521     $ 1,248       22 %
As a percent of net sales
                       
Sales and marketing expenses
    8.5 %     17.8 %        
General and administrative expenses
    16.9 %     30.3 %        
Share-Based Compensation Included Above:
                       
Sales and marketing expenses
  $ 41     $ 30       37 %
General and administrative expenses
  $ 135     $ 111       22 %

Sales and Marketing Expense

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel costs and costs related to our sales force and marketing staff.  They also include expenses relating to advertising, brand building, marketing promotions and trade show events, lead generation, investor relations, and travel and related overhead.  Commissions are due and payable when customer payment is received.  Sales and marketing expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased $37 thousand, or 5% compared to the prior year period, due to the addition of our Italian operations.

6

 
General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist of personnel and related costs for accounting, legal, information systems, human resources, and other administrative functions.  They also include professional service fees, bad debt expense, and other corporate expenses and related overhead.  General and administrative expenses increased by $0.3 million, or 22%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the prior year period.  The increase was attributable to approximately $0.5 million related to the addition of our Italian operations offset by a decrease in auditing and professional fees of $0.2 million, and a decrease in worker’s compensation insurance of $0.06 million.
 

Other Income and Expenses

Other income and expense consists of change in fair value of financial instruments, interest income, interest expense, and other income (expense).  Change in fair value of financial instruments consists of gain on the fair value and cancellation of warrant liability in the 2009 period and changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration liability in the 2010 period.

Income Taxes

For three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the effective tax rate is different from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to changes in the valuation allowance, the fair value of the contingent consideration liability and financial instruments, and earnings considered as indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations.  The Company recognized a valuation allowance of $1.4 million for its net deferred tax assets associated with its U.S. operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010.  The valuation allowance was recorded as we believe based on current U.S. operations that it has become more likely than not that we will be unable to realize our U.S. net operating loss carry forwards. 

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

Our total net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $12.4 million, an increase of $3.5 million, or 39%, from the six months ended June 30, 2009.  U.S. net sales were $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a decrease of $3.5 million, or 64%, from the prior year period.  Our Italian operations provided $4.3 million of net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  Spain’s net sales were $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, an increase of $2.7 million, or 78%, from the prior year period. 

Our net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2010, was $(0.1) million, or $(0.00) per share, compared to net income of $0.5 million, or $0.02 per share, for six months ended June 30, 2009.  Net loss included $5.8 million associated with the adjustment to fair value of the contingent consideration liability for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets of $1.4 million.  Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was impacted by a $2.2 million gain associated with the cancellation of all of our issued and outstanding Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants.  Cost of sales increased by $3.9 million, or 49%, in the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the prior year period.  Operating expenses increased by $0.9 million, or 25%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Sources of Revenue

   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2010
   
2009
   
Change %
 
Net sales:
                 
United States
  $ 1,984     $ 5,469       (64 )%
Italy
    4,306       -       -  
Spain
    6,135       3,439       78 %
    $ 12,425     $ 8,908       39 %

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, in addition to net sales under installation contracts, we derived more sales in our distribution business.   In the U.S. we derived $0.1 million, Italy derived $4.0 million, and Spain derived $1.3 million in sales from our distribution business, which in the aggregate accounted for 44% of our total revenue.  We did not start our distribution business in Spain until 2010.  The decrease in net sales in the United States is largely the result of three items: the financial crisis resulting in tightened lending and access to cash from banks, which slowed business development dramatically in the first half of the year, the lack of available project finance as a result of the Company’s focus on larger projects, and the fact that we focused our business on commercial deals which have a longer sales cycle.  We have begun to build a strong product pipeline and backlog in the U.S., and we have partnered with several Power Purchase Agreement providers and expect to begin to have signed projects from these efforts in future quarters.  The growth in Italian net sales is a result of the acquisition of our Italian subsidiary in the third quarter of 2009.  The increase in our Spanish segment is largely the result of collaboration with a Czech Republic company to perform distribution and engineering, procurement, and construction services on up to 19 megawatts of solar projects which began in the second quarter of 2010.

7


Cost of Sales

   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2010
   
2009
   
Change %
 
Cost of Sales
                 
           United States
  $ 2,347     $ 5,107       (54 )%
           Italy
    3,971       -       -  
           Spain
    5,626       2,904       94 %
    $ 11,944     $ 8,011       49 %
                         
Share-based compensation included above
  $ 150     $ 93       61 %
Gross Margin Percentage
                       
           United States
    -18.3 %     6.6 %        
           Italy
    7.8 %     -          
           Spain
    8.3 %     15.6 %        
      3.9 %     10.1 %        

Cost of sales increased $3.9 million, or 49%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009.  The increase was primarily the result of increased recognized sales in the Spanish market and the addition of our Italian operation.  U.S. gross margin decreased to negative 18.3% due to the recognition of an insufficient volume of net sales to cover fixed operation costs, the increased competitive nature of the industry and the scope and size of projects as larger projects typically have lower gross margins.  The gross margin for our Italian operations was 7.8% and is a combination of generating less of our revenue from solar projects and increased lower margin distribution sales.  Cost of sales for our Spanish operations increased $2.7 million, or 94%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009.  The increase was primarily the result of increased in net sales from our new Czech Republic collaboration.  The gross margin for our Spanish operations decreased to 8.3% due to entry into the Czech Republic market where initially we are primarily providing procurement, distribution, and engineering services, which generally have lower margins than those realized on our construction contracts.

  Operating Expenses

   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
(Dollars in thousands)
 
2010
   
2009
   
Change %
 
Sales and marketing expenses
  $ 1,512     $ 1,389       9 %
General and administrative expenses
  $ 3,181     $ 2,376       34 %
As a percent of net sales
                       
Sales and marketing expenses
    12.2 %     15.6 %        
General and administrative expenses
    25.6 %     26.7 %        
Share-Based Compensation Included Above:
                       
Sales and marketing expenses
  $ 66     $ 61       8 %
General and administrative expenses
  $ 266     $ 211       26 %

Sales and Marketing Expenses

Selling and marketing expense were slightly higher for the six months ended June 30, 2010 by $0.1 million, or 9%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009 as result of the addition of our Italian operations.

8

 
General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased by $0.8 million, or 34%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009.  The increase was attributable to the addition of our Italian operations.

Other Income and Expenses

Other income and expense consists of change in fair value of financial instruments, interest income, interest expense, and other income (expense).  Change in fair value of financial instruments consists of gain on the fair value and cancellation of warrant liability and changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liability.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, interest expense increased by $0.1 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009, due to increased borrowing in the U.S. and Spain.

Income Taxes

For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the effective tax rate is different from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily due to changes in the valuation allowance, the fair value of the contingent consideration liability and financial instruments, and earnings considered as indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations.  The valuation allowance of $1.4 million related to net deferred tax assets associated with our U.S. operations was recorded as we believe based on current U.S. operations that it has become more likely than not that we will be unable to realize our U.S. net operating loss carryforwards.

Liquidity

Cash Flows

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009

   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(in thousands)
 
Net cash used in operating activities
  $ (1,732 )   $ (5,425 )
Net cash used in investing activities
  $ (30 )   $ (75 )
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities
  $ (326 )   $ 3,351  
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
  $ (2,231 )   $ (2,218 )

 
The Company generates cash from operations primarily from cash collections related to its installation and distribution sales.  Net cash flow used in operating activities was $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared with net cash used in operating activities of $5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.  Our largest source of operating cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010, was the reduction of cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts.  Our primary uses of cash from operating activities are our increase in accounts receivable.  As of June 30, 2010, we had significant projects pending billing upon completion in our Italian business segment.  Upon billing and receipt, we anticipate an increase in cash and cash equivalents.

The change in cash flows from investing activities was minimal for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 with minimal capital asset purchases.

The change in cash flows from financing activities primarily relate to borrowings and payment under debt facilities as well as costs related to share registration.  The net cash flows from financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was mainly the result of the issuance of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in exchange for net proceeds of $3 million during the first half of 2009.

Material Impact of Known Events on Liquidity

Our expanding large-scale solar power project development business in Italy is expected to have increasing liquidity requirements in the future. Solar power project development cycles can take several months to develop. In certain of our markets, primarily Italy, it is not uncommon to receive payment at the end of a project. This may require us to make an advancement of costs prior to cash receipts. To date, we have financed these up-front construction costs using working capital and cash on hand.

The disruption in the credit markets has had a significant adverse impact on a number of financial institutions.  As of June 30, 2010, however, our liquidity and capital investments have not been materially adversely impacted, and we believe that they will not be materially adversely impacted in the near future.  We will continue to closely monitor our liquidity and the credit markets.  Nonetheless, we cannot predict with any certainty the impact to us of any further disruption in the credit environment.

There are no other known events that are expected to have a material impact on our short-term or long-term liquidity.

9


Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2010, we had $1.6 million of cash and cash equivalents.  We also have extended payment terms on certain of our accounts payable from large solar projects that we believe will provide additional working capital.  We have financed our operations primarily through operating activities, debt and equity financings.  We have in place a $7.0 million credit line with Umpqua Bank that is currently available for working capital and capital expenditures, which expires on July 13, 2011. We renewed a €100,000 credit line for Premier Power Spain, which expires on August 1, 2011. The amount available for borrowing under the Umpqua Bank line is limited by certain financial calculations.  Please see the discussion below under “Lines of Credit.” At June 30, 2010, no funds were available under the Umpqua line, and $0.1 million was available under Premier Power Spain’s line of credit.

We also have backlog in the amount of approximately $60.1 million, as of June 30, 2010, consisting of non-cancellable signed contracts for projects for approximately 27 MW that the Company expects to complete within the next 12 months, including projects for 2 MW representing revenues of approximately $9.6 million in the Italian business segment, projects for 3.5 MW representing revenues of approximately $9.8 million in the U.S. business segment, and projects for 18 MW representing revenues of approximately $37.0 million in the Spanish business segment, of which 8.7 MW and approximately $14.9 million in revenues are for projects in the Czech Republic. In addition to our cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable, we expect to invoice approximately $7.8 million against our costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts in the next 90 days. Thus, we believe that our current cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operations, and our lines of credit with banks will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs, including our cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months.

We may seek to raise additional cash to fund future project investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. To the extent it becomes necessary to raise additional cash in the future, we may seek to raise it through the sale of debt or equity securities, funding from joint-venture or strategic partners, debt financing or loans, issuance of common stock, or a combination of the foregoing. We cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to secure the additional cash or working capital we may require to continue our operations.

 
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Line of Credit

On July 13, 2009, we entered into a loan agreement with Umpqua Bank, an Oregon corporation, for a line of credit of up to $12 million, maturing on July 13, 2011.  The loan agreement provides for an initial line of credit of $7 million, provided, however, that we may request no more than twice prior to the maturity date that the line of credit be increased to an amount not to exceed $12.0 million in the event that we acquire another subsidiary and require additional working capital for such subsidiary.  The line of credit is secured by our assets and by the assets of Premier Power California and Bright Future.  The line of credit bears interest at the prime rate, provided, however, that the interest rate will not be less than five percent (5%) per annum.  At June 30, 2010, the interest rate was 5% per annum.  As of June 30, 2010, there was $1.4 million outstanding under the agreement with Umpqua Bank.  Additionally, certain financial ratios under the agreement with Umpqua Bank restrict the amount that we can borrow.
 
The loan agreement with Umpqua Bank contains the following financial condition covenants: (i) minimum debt service charge ratio of 1:20 to 1:00, (ii) minimum current ratio of 1:20 to 1:00, (iii) maximum debt-to-tangible net worth ratio of 3:00 to 1:00, and (iv) minimum tangible net worth of $6.0 million. Under the loan agreement, we are also subject to customary non-financial covenants, including limitations on secured indebtedness and limitations on dividends and other restricted payments.

As of June 30, 2010, we were out of compliance with these ratios as our minimum tangible net worth was $0.1 million and our maximum debt-to-tangible net worth ratio was negative 143.8:1.00.  In addition, as of June 30, 2010, we were out of compliance with the minimum current ratio as the ratio was 1.03:1.00.  Certain of these ratios are negatively affected by the contingent consideration liability.  The minimum current ratio is not impacted by our contingent consideration liability.  Giving effect to the removal of the contingent consideration liability, the minimum tangible net worth and the maximum debt-to-tangible net worth ratios were, at June 30, 2010, $2.1 million for the minimum tangible net worth and 11.3:1.00 for the maximum debt-to-tangible worth ratio, resulting in the Company remaining out of compliance.

10

 
The bank is aware of the non-compliance and has not waived the non-compliance. The bank has verbally indicated that it does not intend to issue a notice of default, nor institute default rates, nor cut funding under the line. We are in discussions with the bank to redefine the financial covenants; in the event, however, that the bank does subject the Company to default provisions, our interest rate would increase to 5% above the then-current rate and our ability to borrow would be limited. Additionally, the bank has the right to request repayment of all outstanding obligations. We believe, however, that our cash and cash equivalent balances in the amount of approximately $1.6 million at June 30, 2010 and the anticipated increase from operating cash flows resulting from increased collections from accounts receivable, extended payment terms on certain of our accounts payable, our backlog, and our expected realization of our costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts, as of June 30, 2010, are sufficient to meet working capital needs should the bank issue a notice of default and demand repayment of all obligations or cut off funding under the line. We do not expect any of these events to occur, though, and believe we have the ability to comply with these covenants once the financial covenants are redefined. Without the redefinition of terms, we are unable to comply with the ratios with which we are out of compliance.

At June 30, 2010, Premier Power Spain had an unsecured line of credit for $0.1 million, which has interest terms of Euribor+3.25 and is due in full on August 1, 2011.  As of June 30, 2010, there was $0.03 million outstanding on the line.
  
Contractual Obligations

We have certain fixed contractual obligations and commitments that include future estimated payments. Changes in our business needs, cancellation provisions, changing interest rates, and other factors may result in actual payments differing from the estimates. We cannot provide certainty regarding the timing and amounts of payments. We have presented below a summary of the most significant assumptions used in our determination of amounts presented in the tables in order to assist in the review of this information within the context of our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2010, and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.

         
Less than 1
             
   
Total
   
year
   
1-3 Years
   
3-5 Years
 
Contractual Obligations:
       
(in thousands)
       
  Bank indebtedness
  $ 2,048     $ 1,689     $ 357     $ 2  
  Operating leases
    398       62       290       46  
    $ 2,446     $ 1,751     $ 647     $ 48  

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any other financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as stockholders’ equity or that are not reflected in our financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity, or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk, or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging, or research and development services with us. 
 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the applicable period to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

11


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 
 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.

There have been no material developments during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 in any material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of which any of our property is the subject.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 to report.

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.

Item 5.  Other Information.
 
(a)  None.
(b)  There were no changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.

Item 6.  Exhibits.

Exhibit
Number
 
Description
3.1
 
Certificate of Incorporation (1)
3.2
 
Bylaws (1)
3.3
 
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, filed August 19, 2008 with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (2)
3.4
 
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, filed August 29, 2008 and effective September 5, 2008 with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (3)
3.5
 
Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, filed September 10, 2008 with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (3)
3.6
 
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation, filed November 24, 2008 with the Secretary of State of Delaware (4)
3.7
 
Amendment to Bylaws (5)
3.8
 
Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on June 12, 2009 (6)
10.1
 
Escrow Agreement Amendment No. 3 between Registrant, Rupinvest Sarl, Esdras Ltd., and Capita Trust Company Limited, dated April 24, 2010 (7)
10.2
 
Limited and Temporary Waiver Agreement between Registrant and Genesis Capital Advisors, LLC, dated April 28, 2010 (8)
10.3
 
Clarification Agreement between Registrant and Genesis Capital Advisors, LLC, dated April 28, 2010 (8)
10.4
 
Reseller Agreement between EC America, Inc., immixGroup, Inc., and the Registrant, dated May 1, 2010 (9)
10.5
 
Employment Agreement between Registrant and Dean R. Marks, dated May 17, 2010 (10)
10.6
 
Employment Agreement between Registrant and Miguel de Anquin, dated May 17, 2010 (10)
10.7
 
Engagement Letter between Registrant and Merriman Curhan Ford & Co., dated June 28, 2010 (11)
31.1
 
Section 302 Certification by the Corporation’s Principal Executive Officer *
31.2
 
Section 302 Certification by the Corporation’s Principal Financial and Accounting Officer *
32.1
 
Section 906 Certification by the Corporation’s Principal Executive Officer *
32.2
 
Section 906 Certification by the Corporation’s Principal Financial and Accounting Officer *

*
Filed herewith.
 
(1)
Filed on February 13, 2007 as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A, and incorporated herein by reference.
(2)
Filed on August 29, 2008 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
(3)
Filed on September 11, 2008 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
12

 
(4)
Filed on November 26, 2008 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
(5)
Filed on January 16, 2009 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
(6)
Filed on June 18, 2009 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
(7)
Filed on April 27, 2010 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
(8)
Filed on April 29, 2010 as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, and incorporated herein by reference.
(9)
Filed on May 25, 2010 as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K, and incorporated herein by reference.
(10)
Filed on May 28, 2010 as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, and incorporated herein by reference.
(11)
Filed on July 8, 2010 as an exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, and incorporated herein by reference.
 
13

 
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
PREMIER POWER RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
 
(Registrant)
   
Date: August 16, 2010
By: 
/s/ Dean R. Marks
   
Dean R. Marks
   
Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)
     
Date: August 16, 2010
By:
/s/ Frank J. Sansone
   
Frank J. Sansone
   
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)

14

Premier Power Renewable ... (CE) (USOTC:PPRW)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024 Click Here for more Premier Power Renewable ... (CE) Charts.
Premier Power Renewable ... (CE) (USOTC:PPRW)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024 Click Here for more Premier Power Renewable ... (CE) Charts.