Calpine Corporation (NYSE:CPN) today reported Adjusted EBITDA of
$788 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to
$780 million in the same period of 2008. Commodity Margin for the
first half of 2009 was $1,179 million, down slightly from $1,188
million in the first half of 2008. In addition, the company
reported Adjusted Free Cash Flow of $157 million. Net loss1 was $46
million, or $0.09 per diluted share, in the first half of 2009,
compared to a net loss of $17 million, or $0.04 per diluted share,
in the prior year period.
“I am pleased to report that, despite the severity of the
economic downturn, Calpine has achieved stable year-over-year
financial performance using the metrics we rely upon to evaluate
our business: Adjusted EBITDA, Commodity Margin and Adjusted Free
Cash Flow,” said Jack Fusco, Calpine’s president and chief
executive officer. “I am pleased with our progress in rebuilding
Calpine as the premier operating company in the IPP sector and our
ability to deliver on our promises. Because the execution of our
hedging strategy, improvements in operations and sustainable
cost-cutting have been better than expected, we are raising and
tightening our projected 2009 Adjusted EBITDA to $1.675 - $1.725
billion and our Adjusted Free Cash Flow to $475 - $525
million.”
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
Second Quarter Results
Adjusted EBITDA was $457 million in the second quarter of 2009,
despite weaker market conditions in Texas and California, compared
to $479 million in the prior year period. The year-over-year
decline was primarily due to a decrease in Commodity Margin from
$675 million in 2008 to $650 million in 2009. Our Texas and West
segments, where Commodity Margin was down by $19 million and $11
million, respectively, largely drove this decline due to lower
market spark spreads given lower power demand and lower natural gas
prices. Meanwhile, Commodity Margin in our Southeast and North
regions was essentially flat, despite the fact that the 2008 period
included $21 million in revenues from the sale of transmission
rights in the Southeast which did not recur in 2009. In the
Southeast region, higher average hedge prices and higher market
heat rates were favorable for our fleet during the second quarter
of 2009.
Aside from the decline in Commodity Margin, Adjusted EBITDA was
also impacted by a $7 million decrease in other revenue, which
resulted from service agreements that terminated in 2008 and from
an operation and maintenance contract. These declines were
partially offset by a $4 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA from
unconsolidated investments in power plants, primarily as a result
of Greenfield Energy Centre which began operations in October 2008.
In addition, controllable expenses as a component of plant
operating expense decreased by $4 million in the 2009 period after
accounting for $7 million in reimbursements for insurance claims
from prior periods that reduced expenses in the second quarter of
2008.
Net income1 declined from $197 million in the second quarter of
2008 to a net loss of $78 million in the second quarter of 2009. As
detailed in Table 1 below, net income, excluding reorganization
items, one-time items and unrealized mark-to-market gains or
losses, declined from $81 million in the second quarter of 2008 to
$49 million in the second quarter of 2009. This decline was
primarily associated with the $25 million year-over-year decrease
in Commodity Margin, as previously noted, as well as a $10 million
decrease in interest income during the 2009 period due to lower
interest rates. These factors were partially offset by a $7 million
increase in income from unconsolidated investments, primarily
related to the Greenfield Energy Centre.
Year-to-Date Results
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, Adjusted EBITDA
increased $8 million to $788 million, despite a $9 million decrease
in Commodity Margin. The decline in Commodity Margin was largely
driven by weaker conditions in our Texas region, where Commodity
Margin declined by $36 million in the first half of 2009 compared
to the first half of 2008. This decline was partially offset by
increases in Commodity Margin in our Southeast region, which
improved by $28 million in the 2009 period due to higher market
heat rates and higher average hedge prices.
In addition to the decline in Commodity Margin, Adjusted EBITDA
was negatively impacted by a $12 million decrease in other revenue,
due to the factors previously noted. Offsetting these declines was
a $15 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated
investments during the first half of 2009, primarily as a result of
the Greenfield Energy Centre. In addition, royalty expenses
decreased by $7 million year-over-year as a result of lower
revenues at The Geysers during the 2009 period. Lastly, we reduced
controllable expenses as a component of plant operating expense by
$9 million, after accounting for $15 million in reimbursements for
insurance claims from prior periods that reduced expenses in the
first half of 2008.
Net loss1 increased from $17 million in the first half of 2008
to $46 million in the first half of 2009. As detailed in Table 1
below, net loss, excluding reorganization items, one-time items and
unrealized mark-to-market gains or losses, increased from $40
million in the first half of 2008 to $42 million in the first half
of 2009. Interest expense, excluding the one-time items noted below
and net of interest income, decreased by $29 million as a result of
lower average debt balances and lower average interest rates during
the six month 2009 period. In addition, income from unconsolidated
investments in power plants increased by $27 million in the first
half of 2009, primarily resulting from our investments in
Greenfield Energy Centre and Otay Mesa Energy Center. Also
benefiting the 2009 period was a reduction of $19 million in other
cost of revenue, which declined as a result of the discontinuation
of the amortization of other assets associated with the sale of
Auburndale in 2008 as well as a decrease in royalty expense at our
Geysers facilities resulting from lower revenues in the first half
of 2009 compared to 2008. These favorable variances were offset in
part by a $20 million increase in plant operating expense, due in
part to $15 million in insurance reimbursements reflected in the
2008 period that did not recur in 2009. In addition, the 2008
period included $20 million in non-cash gains from the amortization
of prepaid power sales agreements compared to none in the 2009
period. Adjusted EBITDA was also negatively impacted by a $12
million decline in other revenue and a $9 million decline in
Commodity Margin, as previously discussed.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, cash flows used in
operating activities improved to a net outflow of $36 million
compared to a net outflow of $586 million in the prior year period.
The primary driver of this improvement was a $236 million reduction
in cash paid for interest, largely as a result of the repayment of
certain debts upon our emergence from bankruptcy in the first half
of 2008. Meanwhile, working capital employed decreased by
approximately $333 million for 2009, after adjusting for debt
related balances and assets held for sale, primarily due to
reductions in margin deposits partially offset by increases in net
current derivative assets. Lastly, cash payments for reorganization
items decreased by $103 million year-over-year. These improvements
were offset in part by a $59 million decrease in cash received for
tax refunds during the 2009 period and a $20 million increase in
cash payments for debt extinguishment costs.
1 Reported as net income (loss) attributable to Calpine on our
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations.
Table 1: Summarized
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June
30,
Six Months Ended June
30,
2009 2008 2009 2008 (in
millions) Operating revenues $ 1,471 $ 2,828 $ 3,148 $ 4,779
Cost of revenue (1,265 ) (2,352 ) (2,660 )
(4,332 ) Gross profit 206 476 488 447 SG&A, income from
unconsolidated investments in power plants and other operating
expense (31 ) (43 ) (62 ) (96 ) Income
from operations 175 433 426 351 Net interest expense, debt
extinguishment costs and other (income) expense (236 )
(193 ) (444 ) (609 ) Income (loss) before
reorganization items and income taxes (61 ) 240 (18 ) (258 )
Reorganization items 3 18 6 (261 ) Income tax expense 15
25 24 20 Net
income (loss) $ (79 ) $ 197 $ (48 ) $ (17 )
Add: Net loss attributable to
the noncontrolling interest 1 — 2 — Net
income (loss) attributable to Calpine $ (78 ) $ 197 $ (46 ) $ (17 )
Reorganization items(1) 3 18 6 (261 ) Other one-time
items(1)(2) 21 6 21 175 Net income
(loss), net of reorganization items and other one-time items (54 )
221 (19 ) (103 ) Unrealized MtM (gains) losses on derivatives(1)(3)
103 (140 ) (23 ) 63 Net income (loss),
net of reorganization items other one-time items and unrealized MtM
impacts $ 49 $ 81 $ (42 ) $ (40 )
__________
(1) Shown net of tax, assuming a 0% effective tax rate for these
items (other than those referenced in note 2 below).
(2) One-time items in the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 include $33 million in debt extinguishment costs, shown net of
tax assuming a 35% effective tax rate. One-time items in the three
months ended June 30, 2008 include $6 million in debt
extinguishment costs. One-time items in the six months ended June
30, 2008 include $13 million in debt extinguishment costs, $135
million in post-petition interest expense and $27 million in
settlement obligations related to our Canadian debtors and other
foreign entities recorded prior to their reconsolidation in
February 2008, both of which were associated with our emergence
from bankruptcy.
(3) Represents unrealized mark-to-market (MtM) (gains) losses on
contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment or
qualify for hedge accounting and the hedge accounting designation
has not been elected.
REGIONAL SEGMENT REVIEW OF
RESULTS
Table 2: Commodity Margin by
Segment (in millions)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
2008(1) 2009 2008(1)
West $ 304 $ 315 $ 601 $ 593 Texas 196 215 318 354 Southeast
80 78 141 113 North 70 67 119 128 Total
$ 650 $ 675 $ 1,179 $ 1,188
__________
(1) 2008 Commodity Margin as previously reported has been recast
to conform to our current year presentation.
West: During the second quarter of 2009, our West segment
benefited from higher hedge levels, higher average hedge prices and
a 2% increase in our average availability as compared to the second
quarter of 2008. Despite these positive factors, a weaker power
market price environment driven by lower natural gas prices, lower
industrial demand and milder weather led to an $11 million decrease
in Commodity Margin for the three months ended June 30, 2009
compared to 2008.
For the six month period, Commodity Margin in the West improved
by $8 million in the first half of 2009 compared to the first half
of 2008. Although market spark spreads for the first half of 2009
settled substantially lower than the prior year period, higher
hedge levels, higher average hedge prices and the sale of surplus
emission allowances in the first quarter led to the Commodity
Margin increase.
Texas: During the second quarter of 2009, Commodity
Margin for the Texas region declined from $215 million in the prior
year period to $196 million in 2009. This $19 million decrease
primarily resulted from weaker natural gas prices and market heat
rates that decreased 68% and 23%, respectively. Although April and
May 2009 market heat rates were weak as a result of weak industrial
demand and mild weather, market heat rates were robust during June
2009 as a result of much warmer than normal temperatures. Despite
the strength seen in June 2009, the overall pricing for the second
quarter of 2009 fell well short of the congestion-driven pricing
observed in the second quarter of 2008.
Commodity Margin in Texas declined from $354 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 to $318 million for the 2009 period.
This decrease is associated primarily with weaker natural gas
prices, weaker market heat rates and congestion-driven power prices
that did not recur to the same extent in 2009, as previously
discussed.
Southeast: Commodity Margin in our Southeast segment
increased by $2 million during the second quarter of 2009, driven
by both higher average hedge prices and higher market heat rates
compared to the prior year period. The increase in market heat
rates and the associated 50% increase in generation for the 2009
second quarter were attributable in part to warmer weather in
particular market areas and natural gas generation displacement of
coal generation in certain sub-markets in our Southeast segment. In
addition, some of our plants benefited from the impact of
advantageous transmission, off-take and transportation agreements
during the 2009 period. These positive performance factors were
largely offset by the negative impact from an unfavorable
arbitration ruling on a steam contract, which impacted our
operating revenue during the second quarter of 2009 and a gain of
$21 million related to the temporary assignment of a transmission
capacity contract in the three months ended June 30, 2008.
For the first half of 2009, Commodity Margin in the Southeast
improved by $28 million compared to the prior year period. The six
month results were largely impacted by the same factors that drove
performance for the second quarter, as previously discussed.
North: In the North region, Commodity Margin improved to
$70 million in the second quarter of 2009 from $67 million in the
prior year period. The improvement in Commodity Margin is primarily
due to rate increases for the power sales agreements associated
with our New York generation assets, lower fuel expenses and the
reconsolidation of RockGen in December 2008. Partially offsetting
these positive factors was a reclassification of transmission
expense to Commodity Margin that had previously been recognized in
plant operating expense as well as lower realized spark spreads for
the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 2008.
Commodity Margin in the North region decreased by $9 million in
the first half of 2009 compared to the prior year period, primarily
due to lower average hedge prices during the six months ended
June 30, 2009, compared to 2008. The impacts of lower hedge
prices were partially offset by rate increases for the power sales
agreements associated with our New York generation assets and lower
fuel expenses.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES
Table 3: Corporate
Liquidity
June 30, December 31,
2009 2008 (in millions) Cash and cash
equivalents, corporate(1) $ 1,028 $ 1,361 Cash and cash
equivalents, non-corporate 454 296 Total cash and
cash equivalents 1,482 1,657 Restricted cash 534 503 Letter of
credit availability(2) 2 2 Revolver availability 55
16 Total current liquidity(3) $ 2,073 $ 2,178
__________
(1) Includes $2 million and $169 million of margin deposits held
from counterparties as of June 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
(2) Includes available balances for Calpine Development
Holdings, Inc. in both periods shown.
(3) Excludes contingent amounts of $150 million under the
Knock-in Facility as of December 31, 2008 and $200 million under
the Commodity Collateral Revolver in both periods shown.
We maintained strong liquidity during the second quarter, ending
the period with liquidity in excess of $2.0 billion. As previously
discussed, operating activities resulted in a net use of cash of
$36 million during the first half of 2009. In addition, cash flows
used in investing activities resulted in a net outflow of $137
million, driven largely by $97 million in capital expenditures,
which were primarily related to well-production maintenance at The
Geysers and purchases of engine parts for use in maintaining our
natural gas-fired fleet. For the first half of 2009, we generated
$157 million of Adjusted Free Cash Flow.
During the second quarter, our subsidiary, Calpine Construction
Finance Company, L.P. (“CCFC”), issued $1.0 billion in senior
secured notes. Proceeds from this issuance, along with cash on
hand, were used to refinance existing CCFC debt, including its
approximately $364 million of term loans that would have been due
during the third quarter of 2009 and approximately $415 million in
notes issued by CCFC and $300 million in preferred shares issued by
CCFC’s parent that would have both matured in the second half of
2011. The refinancing allowed us to transition from floating to
fixed interest rates on the corresponding debt balances and lowered
our coupon rate on such debt to 8.0%.
“Our successful issuance of CCFC’s $1.0 billion notes
demonstrates our ability to opportunistically access capital
markets even amidst widespread uncertainty during the second
quarter,” said Zamir Rauf, Calpine’s chief financial officer. “In
addition, it shows clear progress toward our commitment to
proactively address near-term maturities and simplify our capital
structure. This transaction lowered our interest costs and improved
free cash flow, creating value for our shareholders.”
PLANT
DEVELOPMENT
Russell City Energy Center: During the second quarter, we
announced a landmark agreement with the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District to limit greenhouse gas emissions at the
Russell City Energy Center, a proposed 600 MW combined-cycle
natural gas-fired power plant to be located in Hayward, California.
This agreement demonstrates our commitment to environmental
stewardship, with Russell City Energy Center becoming the first
power plant in the country to be subject to federal greenhouse gas
emissions limits. The project is a joint development effort in
which we own a 65% interest, and an affiliate of General Electric
Capital Corporation holds a 35% interest. Completion of the Russell
City development project is dependent upon obtaining necessary
permits, construction contracts and construction funding under
project financing facilities.
OPERATIONS
UPDATE
Power Operations Achievements: During the second quarter of
2009, we continued to focus on our goal of best-in-class
operations, as demonstrated by:
- Safety: Maintained top-quartile
safety performance with year-to-date lost-time incident rate of
0.19
- Availability: Achieved
near-perfect availability of 99% at Texas fleet during June heat
wave when load was high
- Geothermal Generation: Provided
1.5 million MWh of renewable baseload generation with a forced
outage factor of 0.38% in the second quarter of 2009, compared to
1.50% in the prior year quarter
- Natural Gas Generation: Improved
gas fleet forced outage factor to 2.88% in the second quarter of
2009 from 3.04% in the second quarter of 2008; Achieved forced
outage factor of just 1.92% for Calpine-maintained gas fleet
- Sustainable Cost Reductions:
Reduced controllable expenses, a component of plant operating
expense and SG&A costs, by $17 million year-to-date compared to
2008 after accounting for $15 million in reimbursements for
insurance claims from prior periods that reduced expenses in the
first half of 2008
- Centralized Procurement:
Established national contracts for chemicals and transportation,
capturing efficiencies and cost savings to deliver near-term
benefit
Commercial Operations Achievements: We continued to benefit from
the efforts of our commercial operations team during the second
quarter of 2009, including:
- Effective hedging: Maintained
stable year-over-year Commodity Margin during the first half of
2009, despite an 8.5% decline in generation and 67% decline in
natural gas prices during the second quarter
- Disciplined growth: Russell City
development project is the first U.S. project to voluntarily agree
to federal greenhouse gas emissions limits in its federal air
permit approval process, demonstrating our commitment to
environmental stewardship
- Liquidity management: Nearly
doubled our usage of the first lien hedging program for hedges
relating to 2010 and beyond during 2009
UPDATED OUTLOOK FOR 2009
Table 4: Adjusted EBITDA and
Adjusted Free Cash Flow Guidance for 2009
Full Year 2009 Recurring (in
millions) Adjusted EBITDA $ 1,675 – 1,725 Less: Operating lease
payments 50 $ 50 Major maintenance expense and capital
expenditures(1) 350 ~300 Cash interest, net 755 750 Cash taxes 5 10
Working capital and other adjustments(2) 40 — Adjusted Free
Cash Flow $ 475 – 525
__________
(1) Includes projected Major Maintenance Expense of $190 million
and maintenance Capital Expenditures of $160 million in 2009.
Capital expenditures exclude major construction and development
projects.
(2) Excludes changes in cash collateral for commodity
procurement and risk management activities.
As previously discussed, we are raising and tightening our 2009
projections for Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow. We are
now projecting 2009 Adjusted EBITDA of $1.675 to $1.725 billion, up
from the $1.6 - $1.7 billion we projected earlier this year, and
2009 Adjusted Free Cash Flow of $475 to $525 million, up from our
previous projection of $400 - $500 million.
INVESTOR CONFERENCE CALL AND
WEBCAST
We will host a conference call to discuss our financial and
operating results for the second quarter 2009, on Friday, July 31,
2009, at 10:00 a.m. ET / 9:00 a.m. CT. A listen-only webcast of the
call may be accessed through our web site at www.calpine.com, or by
dialing 888-797-3006 (or 913-312-0388 for international listeners)
at least 10 minutes prior to the beginning of the call. An archived
recording of the call will be made available for a limited time on
the web site. The recording also can be accessed by dialing
888-203-1112 or 719-457-0820 (International) and providing
Confirmation Code 1941999. Presentation materials to accompany the
conference call will be made available on our web site on July 31,
2009.
ABOUT CALPINE
Calpine Corporation is helping meet the needs of an economy that
demands more and cleaner sources of electricity. Founded in 1984,
Calpine is a major U.S. power company, currently capable of
delivering over 24,000 megawatts of clean, cost-effective, reliable
and fuel-efficient power to customers and communities in 16 states
in the United States and Canada. Calpine owns, leases, and operates
low-carbon, natural gas-fired, and renewable geothermal power
plants. Using advanced technologies, Calpine generates power in a
reliable and environmentally responsible manner for the customers
and communities it serves. Please visit www.calpine.com for more
information.
Calpine’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2009, has been filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) and may be found on the SEC’s web site at
www.sec.gov.
FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
In addition to historical information, this Report contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We use words such as
“believe,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “may,” “will”
and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.
Such statements include, among others, those concerning our
expected financial performance and strategic and operational plans,
as well as all assumptions, expectations, predictions, intentions
or beliefs about future events. You are cautioned that any such
forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance
and that a number of risks and uncertainties could cause actual
results to differ materially from those anticipated in the
forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include,
but are not limited to:
- The uncertain length and
severity of the current general financial and economic downturn and
its impacts on our business including demand for our power and
steam products, the ability of our counterparties to perform under
their contracts with us and the cost and availability of capital
and credit;
- Fluctuations in prices for
commodities such as natural gas and power;
- The effects of fluctuations in
liquidity and volatility in the energy commodities markets
including our ability to hedge risks;
- The ability of our customers,
suppliers, service providers and other contractual counterparties
to perform under their contracts with us;
- Our ability to manage our
significant liquidity needs and to comply with covenants under our
Exit Credit Facility and other existing financing obligations;
- Financial results that may be
volatile and may not reflect historical trends due to, among other
things, general economic and market conditions outside of our
control;
- Our ability to attract and
retain customers and counterparties, including suppliers and
service providers, and to manage our customer and counterparty
exposure and credit risk, including our commodity positions;
- Competition, including risks
associated with marketing and selling power in the evolving energy
markets;
- Regulation in the markets in
which we participate and our ability to effectively respond to
changes in laws and regulations or the interpretation thereof
including changing market rules and evolving federal, state and
regional laws and regulations including those related to greenhouse
gas emissions;
- Natural disasters such as
hurricanes, earthquakes and floods that may impact our power plants
or the markets our power plants serve;
- Seasonal fluctuations of our
results and exposure to variations in weather patterns;
- Disruptions in or limitations on
the transportation of natural gas and transmission of power;
- Our ability to attract, retain
and motivate key employees;
- Our ability to implement our new
business plan and strategy;
- Risks related to our geothermal
resources, including the adequacy of our steam reserves, unusual or
unexpected steam field well and pipeline maintenance requirements
and variables associated with the injection of waste water to the
steam reservoir;
- Present and possible future
claims, litigation and enforcement actions, including our ability
to complete the implementation of our Plan of Reorganization;
- The expiration or termination of
our power purchase agreements and the related results on
revenues;
- Risks associated with the
operation, construction and development of power plants including
unscheduled outages or delays and plant efficiencies; and
- Other risks identified in this
release or in our reports and registration statements filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including, without
limitation, the risk factors identified in our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2009 and in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.
Actual results or developments may differ materially from the
expectations expressed or implied in the forward-looking
statements, and we undertake no obligation to update any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future developments or otherwise. Unless specified otherwise, all
information set forth in this release is as of today’s date, and we
undertake no duty to update this information. For additional
information about our general business operations, please refer to
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
and any other recent report we have filed with the SEC. These
filings are available by visiting the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov
or our web site at www.calpine.com.
CALPINE CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE
SHEETS
(Unaudited)
June 30, December 31, 2009
2008 (in millions, exceptshare and per share
amounts) ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash
equivalents $ 1,482 $ 1,657 Accounts receivable, net of allowance
of $40 and $42 822 850 Inventory 171 163 Margin deposits and other
prepaid expense 590 776 Restricted cash, current 484 337 Current
derivative assets 3,361 3,653 Other current assets 58
64 Total current assets 6,968 7,500 Property, plant and
equipment, net 11,760 11,908 Restricted cash, net of current
portion 50 166 Investments 204 144 Long-term derivative assets 387
404 Other assets 606 616 Total assets $ 19,975 $
20,738
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current
liabilities: Accounts payable $ 588 $ 574 Accrued interest payable
59 85 Debt, current portion 634 716 Current derivative liabilities
3,231 3,799 Income taxes payable 6 5 Other current liabilities
223 437 Total current liabilities 4,741 5,616
Debt, net of current portion 9,955 9,756 Deferred income taxes, net
of current portion 93 93 Long-term derivative liabilities 479 698
Other long-term liabilities 209 203 Total liabilities
15,477 16,366 Commitments and contingencies Stockholders’
equity: Preferred stock, $.001 par value per share; 100,000,000
shares authorized; none issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 — — Common stock, $.001 par value per share;
1,400,000,000 shares authorized; 432,412,629 shares issued and
432,112,939 shares outstanding at June 30, 2009; 429,025,057 shares
issued and 428,960,025 shares outstanding at December 31, 2008 1 1
Treasury stock, at cost, 299,690 shares at June 30, 2009 and 65,032
shares at December 31, 2008 (3 ) (1 ) Additional paid-in capital
12,240 12,217 Accumulated deficit (7,735 ) (7,689 ) Accumulated
other comprehensive loss (5 ) (158 ) Total Calpine
stockholders’ equity 4,498 4,370 Noncontrolling interest —
2 Total stockholders’ equity 4,498 4,372 Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 19,975 $ 20,738
CALPINE CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months
Ended December 31, 2009 2008 2009
2008 (in millions, except share and per share
amounts) Operating revenues $ 1,471 $ 2,828 $ 3,148 $ 4,779
Cost of revenue: Fuel and purchased energy expense 922 2,008
1,937 3,613 Plant operating expense 210 206 458 438 Depreciation
and amortization expense 113 108 222 219 Other cost of revenue
20 30 43 62 Total cost of revenue
1,265 2,352 2,660 4,332 Gross profit
206 476 488 447 Sales, general and other administrative expense 48
48 93 96 Income from unconsolidated investments in power plants (23
) (16 ) (40 ) (13 ) Other operating expense 6 11
9 13 Income from operations 175 433 426 351 Interest
expense 207 206 417 625 Interest (income) (4 ) (14 ) (10 ) (27 )
Debt extinguishment costs 33 6 33 13 Other (income) expense, net
— (5 ) 4 (2 ) Income (loss) before
reorganization items and income taxes (61 ) 240 (18 ) (258 )
Reorganization items 3 18 6 (261 )
Income (loss) before income taxes (64 ) 222 (24 ) 3 Income tax
expense 15 25 24 20 Net income (loss) $
(79 ) $ 197 $ (48 ) $ (17 ) Add: Net loss attributable to the
noncontrolling interest 1 — 2 — Net
income (loss) attributable to Calpine $ (78 ) $ 197 $ (46 ) $ (17 )
Basic earnings (loss) per common share: Weighted average
shares of common stock outstanding (in thousands) 485,675
485,004 485,560 485,002 Net income (loss) per
common share attributable to Calpine – basic $ (0.16 ) $ 0.41 $
(0.09 ) $ (0.04 ) Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding (in thousands)
485,675 485,732 485,560 485,002 Net
income (loss) per common share attributable to Calpine – diluted $
(0.16 ) $ 0.41 $ (0.09 ) $ (0.04 )
CALPINE CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
2008 (in millions) Cash flows from operating
activities: Net loss $ (48 ) $ (17 ) Adjustments to reconcile net
loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation and
amortization expense(1) 268 280 Debt extinguishment costs 7 7
Deferred income taxes 26 85 Loss on disposal of assets, excluding
reorganization items 20 6 Mark-to-market activity, net (23 ) 63
Income from unconsolidated investments in power plants (40 ) (13 )
Stock-based compensation expense 22 19 Reorganization items — (322
) Other 1 — Change in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts
receivable 29 (246 ) Derivative instruments (257 ) (255 ) Other
assets 173 (246 ) Accounts payable, LSTC and accrued expenses (23 )
382 Other liabilities (191 ) (329 ) Net cash used in operating
activities (36 ) (586 ) Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (97 ) (79 ) Disposals of
property, plant and equipment — 11 Proceeds from sale of power
plants, turbines and investments — 398 Cash acquired due to
reconsolidation of Canadian Debtors and other foreign entities — 64
Contributions to unconsolidated investments (8 ) (9 )
Return of investment from
unconsolidated investment
— 24
(Increase) decrease in restricted
cash
(31 ) 56 Other (1 ) 4 Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities (137 ) 469 Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of notes payable $ (54 ) $ (49 ) Repayments of project
financing (843 ) (229 ) Borrowings from project financing 1,027 356
Repayments of DIP Facility — (113 ) Borrowings under Exit
Facilities — 3,473 Repayments on Exit Facilities (30 ) (855 )
Repayments on Second Priority Debt — (3,672 ) Repayments on capital
leases (31 ) (26 ) Redemptions of preferred interests (41 ) (159 )
Financing costs (29 ) (187 ) Derivative contracts classified as
financing activities — 34 Other (1 ) (1 ) Net cash used in
financing activities (2 ) (1,428 ) Net decrease in cash and cash
equivalents (175 ) (1,545 ) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of
period 1,657 1,915 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 1,482
$ 370 Cash paid (received) during the period for: Interest,
net of amounts capitalized $ 398 $ 634 Income taxes $ 2 $ 15
Reorganization items included in operating activities, net $ 6 $
109 Reorganization items included in investing activities, net $ —
$
(414
)
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and
financing activities: Settlement of commodity contract with
project financing $ 79 $ — Change in capital expenditures included
in accounts payable $ — $ (6 ) Settlement of LSTC through issuance
of reorganized Calpine Corporation common stock $ — $ 5,200 DIP
Facility borrowings converted into exit financing under Exit
Facilities $ — $ 3,872 Settlement of Convertible Senior Notes and
Unsecured Senior Notes with reorganized Calpine Corporation common
stock $ — $ 3,703
__________
(1) Includes depreciation and amortization that is also recorded
in sales, general and other administrative expense and interest
expense on our Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations.
REGULATION G RECONCILIATIONS
Commodity Margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow
are non-GAAP financial measures that we use as measures of our
performance. These measures should not be viewed as alternatives to
GAAP measures of performance.
Commodity Margin includes our power and steam revenues, capacity
revenue, revenue and expense from renewable energy credits (“REC”),
transmission revenue and expenses, fuel and purchased energy
expense, and cash settlements from our marketing, hedging and
optimization activities that are included in mark-to-market
activity, but excludes the unrealized portion of our mark-to-market
activity and other revenue. Commodity Margin is presented because
we believe it is a useful tool for assessing the performance of our
core operations, and it is a key operational measure reviewed by
our chief operating decision maker. Commodity Margin does not
intend to represent gross profit (loss), the most comparable GAAP
measure, as an indicator of operating performance and is not
necessarily comparable to similarly-titled measures reported by
other companies.
Adjusted EBITDA represents net income (loss) before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted for certain non-cash
and non-recurring items as detailed in the following
reconciliation. Adjusted EBITDA is presented because our management
uses Adjusted EBITDA (i) as a measure of operating performance to
assist in comparing performance from period to period on a
consistent basis and to readily view operating trends; (ii) as a
measure for planning and forecasting overall expectations and for
evaluating actual results against such expectations; and (iii) in
communications with our Board of Directors, shareholders,
creditors, analysts and investors concerning our financial
performance. We believe Adjusted EBITDA is also used by and is
useful to investors and other users of our financial statements in
evaluating our operating performance because it provides them with
an additional tool to compare business performance across companies
and across periods. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent
cash flows from operations or net income (loss) as defined by GAAP
as an indicator of operating performance. Furthermore, Adjusted
EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to similarly-titled measures
reported by other companies.
Adjusted Free Cash Flow represents net income before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted, less operating
lease payments, major maintenance expense and maintenance capital
expenditures, net cash interest, cash taxes, working capital and
other adjustments. Adjusted Free Cash Flow is presented because our
management uses this measure, among others, to make decisions about
capital allocation. Adjusted Free Cash Flow is not intended to
represent cash flows from operations as defined by GAAP as an
indicator of operating performance and is not necessarily
comparable to similarly-titled measures reported by other
companies.
Commodity Margin Reconciliation
The following table reconciles our Commodity Margin to its GAAP
results for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
(in millions)
Consolidation And West
Texas Southeast North Elimination
Total Commodity Margin $ 304 $ 196 $ 80 $ 70 $ — $ 650 Add:
Mark-to-market commodity activity, net and other revenue(1) 57 (140
) (25 ) 14 (9 ) (103 ) Less: Plant operating expense 100 50 35 23 2
210 Depreciation and amortization expense 52 31 17 15 (2 ) 113
Other cost of revenue(2) 12 2 1 7
(4 ) 18 Gross profit (loss) $ 197 $ (27 ) $ 2 $ 39 $
(5 ) $ 206
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
(in millions)
Consolidation And
West Texas Southeast North
Elimination Total Commodity Margin $ 315 $ 215 $ 78 $
67 $ — $ 675 Add: Mark-to-market commodity activity, net and other
revenue(1) 64 51 16 22 (8 ) 145 Less: Plant operating expense 101
52 23 24 6 206 Depreciation and amortization expense 44 33 19 13 (1
) 108 Other cost of revenue(2) 18 6 9 7
(10 ) 30 Gross profit $ 216 $ 175 $ 43 $ 45 $ (3 ) $
476
__________
(1) Mark-to-market commodity activity represents the unrealized
portion of our mark-to-market activity, net, as well as a non-cash
gain from amortization of prepaid power sales agreements included
in operating revenues and fuel and purchased energy expense on our
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations.
(2) Excludes $2 million and nil of REC expense for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which is
included as a component of Commodity Margin.
Commodity Margin Reconciliation (continued)
The following table reconciles our Commodity Margin to its GAAP
results for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
(in millions)
Consolidation And West
Texas Southeast North Elimination
Total Commodity Margin $ 601 $ 318 $ 141 $ 119 $ — $ 1,179
Add: Mark-to-market commodity activity, net and other revenue(1) 79
(50 ) 6 16 (23 ) 28 Less: Plant operating expense 227 128 67 43 (7
) 458 Depreciation and amortization expense 101 61 33 31 (4 ) 222
Other cost of revenue(2) 27 5 4 13
(10 ) 39 Gross profit $ 325 $ 74 $ 43 $ 48 $ (2 ) $
488
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
(in millions)
Consolidation And West
Texas Southeast North Elimination
Total Commodity Margin $ 593 $ 354 $ 113 $ 128 $ — $ 1,188
Add: Mark-to-market commodity activity, net and other revenue(1) 15
(74 ) 3 45 (11 ) (22 ) Less: Plant operating expense 213 122 53 50
— 438 Depreciation and amortization expense 95 63 38 25 (2 ) 219
Other cost of revenue(2) 35 6 18 13
(10 ) 62 Gross profit $ 265 $ 89 $ 7 $ 85 $ 1 $ 447
__________
(1) Mark-to-market commodity activity represents the unrealized
portion of our mark-to-market activity, net, as well as a non-cash
gain from amortization of prepaid power sales agreements included
in operating revenues and fuel and purchased energy expense on our
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations.
(2) Excludes $4 million and nil of REC expense for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which is
included as a component of Commodity Margin.
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA
Reconciliation
In the following table, we have
reconciled our Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Free Cash Flow to our
Income from operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, as reported under GAAP. No items listed below Income
from operations as reported on our Consolidated Condensed
Statements of Operations are included in the table as they are
excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months
Ended June 30, 2009 2008(1) 2009
2008(1) (in millions) Income from operations $
175 $ 433 $ 426 $ 351 Add: Adjustments to reconcile GAAP income
from operations to Adjusted EBITDA: Depreciation and amortization
expense, excluding deferred financing costs(2) 116 118 229 240
Impairment charges — 6 — 6 Major maintenance expense 40 42 102 96
Operating lease expense 11 11 23 23 Non-cash gains on
derivatives(3) — (11 ) — (20 ) Unrealized (gains) losses on
commodity derivative mark-to-market activity 108 (122 ) (17 ) 65
Adjustments to reflect Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated
investments(4),(5) (15 ) (12 ) (17 ) (5 ) Stock-based compensation
expense 9 13 22 19 Non-cash loss on dispositions of assets 9 2 17 8
Other(6) 4 (1 ) 3 (3 ) Adjusted EBITDA
$ 457 $ 479 $ 788 $ 780 Less: Lease payments 11 23 Major
maintenance expense and capital expenditures(6) 84 197 Cash
interest(7) 163 387 Cash taxes 11 2 Working capital and other
adjustments 75 22 Adjusted Free Cash Flow $ 113 $ 157
_________
(1) Adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, has been recast to conform to our current
period definition.
(2) Depreciation and amortization expense in the income from
operations calculation on our Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Operations excludes amortization of other assets and amounts
classified as sales, general and other administrative expenses.
(3) Includes realized non-cash gains on derivatives that do not
qualify for hedge accounting.
(4) Included in our Consolidated Condensed Statements of
Operations in income from unconsolidated investments in power
plants.
(5) Adjustments to reflect Adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated
investments include $(20) million and $(14) million in unrealized
losses on mark-to-market activity for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $(28) million and
$(8) million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
(6) Includes $40 million and $102 million in major maintenance
expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively, and $44 million and $95 million in capital
expenditures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively.
(7) Includes fees for letters of credit.
Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted
Free Cash Flow Reconciliation for 2009 Guidance
Full Year 2009 Range: Low High
Recurring (in millions) Income from operations $ 1,025 $
1,075 Plus: Depreciation and amortization expense 475 475 Major
maintenance expense 190 190 Operating lease expense 50 50 Other(1)
(65 ) (65 ) Adjusted EBITDA $ 1,675 $ 1,725 Less:
Operating lease payments 50 50 $ 50 Major maintenance expense and
maintenance capital expenditures(2) 350 350 ~300 Cash interest,
net(3) 755 755 750 Cash taxes 5 5 10 Working capital and other
adjustments 40 40 — Adjusted Free Cash Flow $ 475 $
525
__________
(1) Other includes stock-based compensation expense and other
adjustments.
(2) Includes major maintenance expense of $190 million and
maintenance capital expenditures of $160 million. Capital
expenditures exclude major construction and development projects
funded with debt.
(3) Includes fees for letters of credit.
CASH FLOW ACTIVITIES
The following table summarizes our
cash flow activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008:
(Unaudited) Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 2008 (in millions) Beginning cash and
cash equivalents $ 1,657 $ 1,915 Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities (36 ) (586 ) Investing activities (137 ) 469
Financing activities (2 ) (1,428 ) Net decrease in
cash and cash equivalents (175 ) (1,545 ) Ending cash
and cash equivalents $ 1,482 $ 370
OPERATING PERFORMANCE
METRICS
The table below shows the
operating performance metrics for continuing operations:
Three Months Ended June 30, Six
Months Ended June 30, 2009 2008
2009 2008 Total MWh generated(1) (in
thousands) 19,399 21,211 38,666 42,117
West 6,724 7,982 15,661 17,139 Texas 7,605 9,477 12,812 17,218
Southeast 3,957 2,635 7,836 5,305 North 1,113 1,117 2,357 2,455
Average availability 90.8% 89.9% 90.8% 87.9% West 91.2%
89.6% 90.8% 86.5% Texas 90.7% 91.8% 89.5% 86.9% Southeast 87.7%
89.3% 90.9% 90.2% North 96.0% 87.4% 94.0% 89.7% Average
capacity factor, excluding peakers 43.0% 46.4% 43.1% 46.3% West
48.5% 57.3% 56.8% 61.9% Texas 48.0% 59.8% 40.7% 54.4% Southeast
34.6% 21.2% 34.5% 21.9% North 27.1% 28.0% 29.5% 31.1% Steam
adjusted Heat Rate 7,271 7,268 7,230 7,215 West 7,414 7,319 7,296
7,269 Texas 7,132 7,144 7,086 7,057 Southeast 7,241 7,459 7,235
7,460 North 7,687 7,635 7,658 7,516
__________
(1) MWh generated is shown here as our net operating interest.
Excludes generation at RockGen during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, as the plant was deconsolidated during this
period.
Calpine (NYSE:CPN)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024
Calpine (NYSE:CPN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024