false
0001289419
0001289419
2023-12-19
2023-12-19
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
8-K
CURRENT
REPORT
Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported): December 19, 2023
MORNINGSTAR,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Illinois |
000-51280 |
36-3297908 |
(State
or other
jurisdiction
of incorporation) |
(Commission
File Number) |
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
22
West Washington Street |
|
Chicago,
Illinois |
60602 |
(Address
of principal executive offices) |
(Zip
Code) |
(312)
696-6000
(Registrant’s
telephone number,
including area code)
N/A
(Former
name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check
the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under
any of the following provisions:
| ¨ | Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
| ¨ | Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
| ¨ | Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405
of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging
growth company ¨
If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of Each Class |
Trading
Symbol |
Name
of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Common
stock, no par value |
MORN |
The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC |
Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.
The following information is included in this Current Report on Form 8-K
as a result of Morningstar, Inc.’s policy regarding public disclosure of corporate information.
Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This current report on Form 8-K contains forward-looking statements
as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on our current expectations about
future events or future financial performance. Forward-looking statements by their nature address matters that are, to different degrees,
uncertain, and often contain words such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,”
“seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,”
“prospects,” or “continue.” These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause
the events we discuss not to occur or to differ significantly from what we expect. For us, these risks and uncertainties include, among
others,
| • | failing to maintain and protect our brand, independence, and reputation; |
| • | liability related to cybersecurity and the protection of confidential information, including personal information about individuals; |
| • | compliance failures, regulatory action, or changes in laws applicable to our credit ratings operations, investment advisory, ESG and
index businesses; |
| • | failing to innovate our product and service offerings or anticipate our clients’ changing needs; |
| • | prolonged volatility or downturns affecting the financial sector, global financial markets, and the global economy and its effect
on our revenue from asset-based fees and credit ratings business; |
| • | failing to recruit, develop, and retain qualified employees; |
| • | liability for any losses that result from errors in our automated advisory tools; |
| • | inadequacy of our operational risk management and business continuity programs in the event of a material disruptive event; |
| • | failing to efficiently integrate and leverage acquisitions and other investments to produce the results we anticipate; |
| • | failing to scale our operations and increase productivity and its effect on our ability to implement our business plan; |
| • | artificial intelligence and related new technologies that may present business, compliance and reputational risks; |
| • | failing to maintain growth across our businesses in today's fragmented geopolitical, regulatory and cultural world; |
| • | liability relating to the information and data we collect, store, use, create, and distribute or the reports that we publish or are
produced by our software products; |
| • | the potential adverse effect of our indebtedness on our cash flows and financial flexibility; |
| • | challenges in accounting for complexities in taxes in the global jurisdictions in which we operate could materially affect our tax
obligations and tax rate; and |
| • | failing to protect our intellectual property rights or claims of intellectual property infringement against us. |
Investor Questions and Answers: December 19, 2023
We encourage current shareholders, potential shareholders, and other
interested parties to send questions to us in writing and we make written responses available on a regular basis. The following answers
respond to selected questions received through November 1, 2023. We retain the discretion to combine answers for duplicate
or similar questions into one comprehensive response.
If you would like to submit a question,
please send an e-mail to investors@morningstar.com or write to us at the following address:
Morningstar, Inc.
Investor Relations
22 W. Washington St.
Chicago, IL 60602
Margins
| 1. | Could you specify how Morningstar has reduced professional fees? |
To understand our approach to reducing professional fees, it may be
helpful to provide some context on the key drivers of our spending on third-party services. Professional fees at Morningstar fall into
several categories. These include fees paid to third parties to support software development and technology improvements, facilities management,
and systems implementation, as well as fees related to compliance, including audit and tax fees, and legal fees.
In the first nine months of 2023, professional fees declined $13.6 million
compared to the prior-year period. These included professional fees related to M&A activities and the transition of our China activities,
both of which were added back in our calculation of adjusted operating income, a non-GAAP measure provided to help investors understand
the underlying performance of the business and improve comparability of our results. Professional fees related to M&A activities were
$13.7 million and $8.9 million in the first nine months of 2022 and 2023 respectively; professional fees related to the transition of
our China activities totaled $2.4 million and $1.7 million in the first nine months of 2022 and 2023 respectively.
Excluding professional fees related to M&A activities and the transition
of our China activities, professional fees declined by $8.1 million in the first nine months of 2023 compared to the prior year period.
This decrease was partially due to legal fees incurred in 2022 related to the independent investigation into certain Morningstar Sustainalytics
research practices. In addition, the decline reflected our efforts to reduce reliance on third-party subcontractors and providers where
possible, with a focus on non-compliance related activities. These efforts are ongoing as we are carefully prioritizing new projects that
would require third-party support.
| 2. | Given the recent changes in headcount and in expense growth, we’d like to understand the company’s budgeting process
better. Can you give an overview of the process, for example: timing, philosophy, goals used by management, length of plans? Related to
this, to what extent was the slower growth part of management’s long-term investment plan (i.e., consistent with ending a phase
of heavier investment) as opposed to a strategic pivot to return margins to recent historical levels? Has management’s approach
to cost changed significantly in the past year, for example, to reflect the higher cost of capital in today’s macroeconomic environment? |
We have a comprehensive budget and long-range
planning process under which we set financial targets and allocate resources across the company. Our process is linked to our strategic
objectives and designed to support long-term value creation. In particular, we are focused on generating strong returns on invested capital,
supported by sustainable growth with increases in revenues and improvements in operating margins over time. The cost of capital is an
important input to the process, and we regularly review and update our cost of capital estimates based on changes in interest rates and
expected market returns. Recent increases in the cost of capital have translated into higher hurdle rates for investment opportunities,
impacting our view of their relative attractiveness.
Our planning process is annual, beginning in June of each year
and concluding in December. However, we review progress against our strategic objectives and financial plans on a regular basis across
our business during the year. While our planning cycles are focused on three-year periods and the creation of annual budgets, larger strategic
investments (including M&A) with longer-term return horizons are also evaluated and tracked.
Our approach to budgeting and expense management remains largely consistent
with prior years. Each cycle will have different inputs to consider including the macroeconomic environment and how various parts of our
business are stacking up relative to expectations. In 2020, for example, we made decisions around hiring and controlling discretionary
costs to manage the business prudently during a period of uncertainty brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. And, while our recent plans
have targeted certain areas of expense reduction, we’ve accelerated those efforts in several cases due to market conditions and
business performance. During the second and third quarters of 2023, we took actions to reduce headcount in certain areas of the business,
including in Morningstar Sustainalytics, DBRS Morningstar, and Morningstar Wealth, based on our careful assessment of the current market
environment and progress against our expectations.
| 3. | With expense growth slowing at Morningstar in recent quarters, do you anticipate the business continuing to exhibit expense growth
that is slower than revenue growth going forward, such that the company can generally deliver expanding adjusted operating margins over
time? Over the past decade, Morningstar has generally delivered low-to-mid teens revenue growth and adjusted operating margins between
20% and 25%. If Morningstar’s revenue growth was to slow, is this a scenario where management would consider looking to generate
high margins in order to generate long-term earnings growth? |
Yes, as we have shared, it is our goal to get our margins
back to the historical scenarios you cite. While we currently continue to have attractive growth opportunities, to the extent that businesses
in our portfolio exhibit slowing growth, we do expect them to increase margins and run them accordingly. Our recent pivot with Sustainalytics
is a good example of this, where lower-than-anticipated growth led us to reduce the cost base of the business with the goal of increasing
its contribution to our bottom line.
| 4. | Morningstar has realized savings on expenses through actions such as real estate consolidation and a pullback in professional services
fees, and travel costs. When did these first begin to impact earnings, and should we think about these as one-time actions? Are these
actions already having the maximum anticipated impact on expenses, or is there a ramp up to the full savings? More generally, please help
us to understand how these actions are working through the expense base. |
While we have always evaluated the areas you reference and looked for
opportunities to optimize costs, we started to see the impact of additional efforts in areas including real estate, travel, and professional
fees in the second and third quarters of 2023. We also took actions to reduce headcount in the second and third quarters in certain areas
and started to see the impact of these decisions in the third quarter of 2023. We expect these efforts to continue to have a positive
effect into 2024.
| 5. | Morningstar has previously mentioned real estate as an opportunity. Does this refer to a small number of office closures or a global
initiative to reduce office space across the company? Do employees still work from home and is this part of the reason why it makes sense
to consolidate office space? |
Morningstar has a three-day minimum in-office hybrid work policy, although
some teams require additional in-office attendance. As we see the impacts of that policy, our workforce strategy, and capacity needs,
we are looking for ways to optimize our global real estate footprint. That is occurring on an ongoing basis as certain leases expire,
or in some cases, ahead of those events.
Recent examples include the consolidation of two London offices, downsizing
our Shenzhen office, and space reductions in Chicago. We’ve also closed smaller offices in favor of flexible workspaces.
Headcount
| 6. | Are there further opportunities to right size headcount? Is Morningstar still actively hiring or taking a more selective approach
to filling vacant positions (i.e., achieving headcount reduction through natural attrition)? |
We remain focused on matching our teams’ size to the market opportunity
across our business. In the second and third quarters of 2023, that meant taking action to reduce headcount in certain parts of the business,
including Morningstar Sustainalytics, Morningstar Wealth, and DBRS Morningstar. These actions were based on our careful assessment of
the current operating environment and progress against our expectations, and reflected what we believe we need to do support future growth
and realize returns on the investments we’ve made to date.
We are taking a cautionary approach to hiring and continue to manage
backfills with prudence.
Capital Structure
| 7. | Now that Net Leverage is approaching 2x, will Morningstar consider a more aggressive approach to capital allocation? Specifically,
would management consider repurchasing shares or pursuing more M&A? What is the priority? |
We continue to take a balanced approach to capital allocation with a
near-to-intermediate term focus on paying down debt. Consistent with this approach, we repaid roughly $98 million of debt in the third
quarter of 2023. That contributed to a decline in our consolidated funded indebtedness to EBITDA, as defined in our credit agreements,
which we calculated as approximately 2.0x as of September 30, 2023, compared to 2.2x as of December 31, 2022. Still, a significant
portion of our debt is variable rate, and our cost of borrowing has increased with the rise in interest rates. As a result, debt reduction
remains a priority.
We repurchase shares under our Board-approved repurchase program when
we believe that the return potential is attractive compared to other uses of cash and continue to take that approach. Similarly, we evaluate
the returns of any M&A transaction relative to expected returns for other uses of capital with a focus on cash-on-cash returns and
internal rates of return.
Climate Action Plan
| 8. | When do you plan to commit to SBTi, as highlighted in your 8K? Given that you already consider your targets to be science based,
this appears to be an easy win, and we would encourage you to do this as soon as is practicable. (From our perspective as a Paris Aligned
fund, a key ask from us for all our holdings is SBTi validation.) |
As you note, Morningstar’s current
targets are considered ‘science-based’ because they are in line with what the latest climate science deems necessary to meet
the goals of the Paris Agreement, limiting global warming to well-below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts
to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Our Climate Transition Plan outlines our current planned decarbonization approach,
which is aligned to the standardized 1.5-degree Celsius sectoral pathway from the SBTi. We sought advice from external consultants on
our decarbonization efforts and aim to align our actions with the latest guidance from the SBTi.
As our climate transition planning efforts mature, we will work to close
existing gaps in our greenhouse gas emissions accounting, which exist primarily in our scope 3 emissions. We will continue annual reporting
against progress on our climate commitment. Our near-term goals include publication of our first Task Force on Climate-Related Financial
Disclosures (TCFD)-aligned report, which we are prioritizing as part of our commitment to the Net Zero Financial Service Providers Alliance.
We appreciate your feedback on the importance of SBTi validation. Our long-term goals include certification of our efforts by the SBTi,
but we have not yet committed to a timeline.
| 9. | Would you be willing to publish forward-looking milestones to hitting your targets? We know that decarbonization is typically
not linear, but milestones provide a bridge between now and 2030 for your targeted 50% reduction and can let us track if you are
generally on target. Would you be willing to link a percentage of variable exec remuneration to achieving those milestones? Again,
this is something we are encouraging across our portfolio. |
Morningstar has committed to decarbonize
50% of our scope 1 and scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and publish our emissions annually in our Corporate Sustainability Report. We
are in the process of considering what additional, forward-looking milestones would be appropriate for our decarbonization journey and
appreciate your feedback. Presently, we do not tie executive remuneration to our emissions milestones.
Private Credit
| 10. | How is Morningstar positioned to serve the rapidly growing private credit market? Which products currently apply and is Morningstar
developing new solutions? |
With the integration of Leveraged
Commentary & Data (LCD) nearing completion, the PitchBook platform is now able to address multiple private credit data and analytics
use cases. Over the past year, we’ve worked hard to bring the richness of LCD’s research and news on the leveraged loan, bond,
and private credit markets to the PitchBook platform. In the third quarter of 2023, we integrated LCD news and significantly expanded
the deals, bonds, and loan data available on the platform, and launched The Credit Pitch newsletter to a broad group of leveraged finance
market participants. PitchBook now provides granular data on key areas in the syndicated loan, high yield bond, collateralized loan obligation,
and private credit markets, including distressed debt, direct lending, and other middle market strategies, to support discovery. For
market participants using private credit and syndicated loan vehicles, PitchBook offers a centralized platform to screen, gather, and
visualize global trends in private equity and credit markets. We’ve had good initial results with new sales and client expansions,
driven by the additional use cases we’re now able to support, especially in private credit.
In addition,
Morningstar also serves the private credit market through DBRS Morningstar. As we look to build and diversify our credit ratings business,
we see good opportunities to expand our presence in private (and middle-market) credit in the U.S. and Europe. Looking across the
private space, including structured finance, we saw good growth in DBRS Morningstar private ratings revenue in 2021 and 2022 and private
ratings revenue through the first 10 months of 2023 is ahead of the 2022 total.
PitchBook
| 11. | PitchBook organic growth has decelerated from the Covid period. You have mentioned that reduced demand from corporate customers
has been a driver of this. Does management believe that there have been any changes in the competitive environment or PitchBook’s
win-loss rates? Or is the reduced demand entirely linked to the current state of capital market deal activity? |
The global decline in private capital invested has been the primary
driver of PitchBook’s slower organic growth, although with revenues up 21.7% through the first nine months of 2023 on an organic
basis, PitchBook’s growth remains strong on an absolute basis relative to any notable peer. Over the trailing 12 months ended September 30,
2023, private capital raised fell about 14% compared to what was reported at the same time for the prior-year period, as detailed in PitchBook’s
Global Private Market Fundraising Report. We do not see any material recent change in the competitive environment.
| 12. | In a prior response, Morningstar indicated that revenue from existing clients exceeded revenue from new clients in PitchBook’s
growth in 2022, while in H1 of 2023, the mix was roughly balanced. Does that changing mix indicate that new client sales have improved
as we moved from 2022 into 2023? |
Through the first nine months of 2023, revenue growth has been driven by a mix of revenue coming from the expansion of existing client
contracts and revenue from the addition of new clients. During the period, total sales increased, with new client sales continuing to
contribute meaningfully. That said, sales attributable to new clients slowed in the first nine months of 2023 compared to the prior-year
period. The global drop in private capital invested contributed to this softening in new client sales, with an outsized impact on fair-weather
market participants including opportunistic corporates and non-traditional asset managers.
More broadly, as PitchBook's client base has grown, the expansion opportunity with existing clients has also increased. This is the foundation
of PitchBook’s business model: We sell to new customers and then increase the number of licensed users within those organizations.
While sales to new clients have continued to be very healthy, with our large and growing customer base and high renewal and net renewal
rates, the growth opportunity with existing clients has surpassed that of new client sales.
Cloud Transition
| 13. | Does Morningstar store data on a 3P cloud platform (AWS, Azure, Google) or on-premises at its own data center? How significant
are the costs associated with data collection, storage, and distribution; and are there any opportunities to optimize these costs? |
Increasingly, we are shifting our data processes, including data collection
and storage, to the cloud, although we do still store some data on-premises at Morningstar data centers. This evolution is part of our
broader cloud transition out of our data centers, which also includes a focus on developing new products and capabilities in the cloud.
We work with multiple cloud vendors.
As we shift workloads to the cloud and become less reliant on on-premises
servers and storage, we incur lower levels of capex related to on-premises hardware. The shift also provides more flexibility; historically,
we’ve had to build capacity to handle peak demand on our on-premises data servers and we don’t need to invest that way anymore.
As we make the switch to the cloud and operate in this environment, we are continuously focused on optimizing our processes and existing
code to be more cloud friendly. That said, the reduction in capex and related depreciation from legacy datacenters is offset by higher
operating expenses from cloud costs when we initially migrate.
Cybersecurity
| 14. | What measures has Morningstar taken to mitigate cyber security risks? |
One of Morningstar’s most valuable assets is the trust we’ve
built with our stakeholders. We recognize our responsibility to safeguard their information and we expend considerable effort and resources
to protect all data pertaining to our clients, colleagues, and partners.
Our chief information security officer leads a dedicated team responsible
for our comprehensive information security program. The program covers IT risk governance, software and product security, security operations
and incident management, IT compliance, technical disaster recovery, and determining enterprise-wide security policies and procedures.
The team is responsible for maintaining and implementing Morningstar's Information Security Policies, which define requirements for information
classification, appropriate data handling and usage, roles and responsibilities, access controls and provisioning, logging, monitoring,
cryptography and key management, security awareness, virus prevention, risk assessments, physical security, mobile device policy, network
security, vulnerability management, policy enforcement, and handling of exceptions. Policies are aligned with ISO 27001:2013 and NIST
(National Institute of Standards and Technology) SP-800 publications. We regularly benchmark our information security program against
NIST’s Cybersecurity Framework to identify our current maturity and measure progress in our program.
Preparedness is a crucial component of our information security and
privacy programs. All Morningstar employees undergo annual security awareness training. We also operate a quarterly phishing exercise
to educate and test our employees. The security operations team conducts red team exercises to assess any ability to compromise our infrastructure
and gain insight into our ability to detect and respond to an attack.
On a business level, we perform quarterly tabletop exercises to prepare
stakeholders for security incidents and practice our response procedures. Furthermore, our enterprise resilience team manages both disaster
recovery as well as business continuity plans and prepares the firm to recover from high-impact incidents. Should an incident occur, we
operate a 24x7 security operations team to respond to security incidents and notify relevant stakeholders.
At the board level, our Audit Committee has oversight of our cybersecurity
risk exposures and regularly reviews and discusses risks related to our cybersecurity practices with management.
For more detail please see
Morningstar’s Approach to Data and Information Security, available at www.morningstar.com/company/corporate-sustainability-policies-reports. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Report.
Morningstar Sustainalytics
| 15. | Why has Sustainalytics lost market share in second party opinions according to Cicero (Center for International Climate Research)?
What is the strategy to defend market share? |
Researchers use different methodologies to measure sustainable bond
activity and second-party opinion (SPO) market share, including total volume of issuance, total bonds issued under a second-party opinion
framework, and second-party opinions published. While we are not familiar with Cicero’s methodology, Environmental Finance regularly
provides market share metrics based on SPOs published on public bonds. According to Environmental Finance, Morningstar Sustainalytics
had a 24% market share of SPOs produced by an SPO provider in 2022, down from 27% in 2021; for the first half of 2023, its market share
stood at 21%.
We believe that shorter term fluctuations in market share are not meaningful
given the relative immaturity of the market. We’d also note that the industry generally does not track private sustainable transactions,
so any market share numbers do not reflect our SPOs on private transactions. That said, we acknowledge that Morningstar Sustainalytics
market share in SPOs has fallen since 2020, primarily due to increasing competition as major players have focused on the SPO market. In
particular, S&P Global acquired Cicero Shades of Green in late 2022. Moody’s also recently completed the integration of SPO
provider Vigeo Eiris, and MSCI and Sustainable Fitch have entered the market.
We believe that we continue to offer a compelling value proposition
in SPOs. As a long-time leading provider of SPOs with deep knowledge of the ESG space, we’re well-positioned to offer opinions on
even the most complex transactions. We are focusing our activities and sales efforts on areas with the most attractive growth opportunities,
including the U.S. securitized bond market. To support these efforts, we have invested in building out our sales effort dedicated to SPOs
and consolidated regional reporting structures to drive greater efficiencies.
| 16. | Morningstar has reduced in areas such as Sustainalytics citing actual performance that was lower than expectations. Can you help
us better understand where in the business expectations were missed, and how much of this was due to the reduced demand for ESG products
as opposed to Sustainalytics' own execution? |
While Morningstar Sustainalytics’ organic growth rate of 14.0%
made it one of our fastest growing product areas in the first nine months of 2023, contributing to double-digit growth in the Data and
Analytics segment, it meaningfully lagged our expectations. The shortfall relative to our expectations was driven in part by reduced demand
for certain ESG products. We experienced softening demand for second-party opinions (SPOs), which contributed to a sharp drop in revenue
for this product for the year-to-date period through September 2023, compared to the prior-year period. Meanwhile, we’ve also
experienced weaker-than-expected demand in the U.S. for Morningstar Sustainalytics’ license-based products, especially from asset
and wealth managers.
Execution-related challenges also contributed to the shortfall. In the
first half of the year, we experienced significant turnover in the Morningstar Sustainalytics sales team as demand for professionals with
ESG experience surged, with particularly significant impacts on our U.S., UK, and Asia Pacific businesses. That turnover has since stabilized.
In addition, on the product side, our 2023 roadmap relied heavily on the release of our Impact Ratings and Climate Solutions product suite.
We didn’t deliver on our Impact Ratings launch this year and are revisiting this methodology.
Our record with the launch of our Climate Solutions product suite includes
some important successes, but also remaining challenges. Our key competitors had invested ahead of us in this area, and we directed considerable
investment over the past couple of years to developing our solution. In April 2023, we successfully launched our new flagship Low
Carbon Transition Ratings (LCTR) and released meaningful enhancements to our Physical Climate Risk Metrics (launched initially in 2022
in partnership with XDI). Together, these products fill two major thematic gaps in our suite and enable institutions to identify, evaluate,
manage, and report on their climate risks (both transition and physical risks). Following these launches, our commercialization efforts
over the last nine months have built a solid pipeline, and secured deals with prominent clients, indicating strong interest in our offering.
At the same time, regulatory pressure has been building as multiple
jurisdictions globally moved toward mandating climate-related financial disclosures, with new requirements coming into force in 2024 and
2025 in many jurisdictions, and in 2023 in the UK. Our offering is well-aligned to support institutions in reporting according to the
TCFD framework, which forms the basis for many of these new requirements. However, we’ve
had to accelerate our development work to address additional market-specific disclosure requirements. We’ve lost some opportunities
as a result but are prioritizing this area in the months ahead.
Morningstar Wealth
| 17. | How is Morningstar’s turnkey asset management solution different from other TAMPs? What is its relative value proposition? |
Morningstar’s turnkey asset management solution (TAMP) provides
financial advisors with a breadth of capabilities that are designed to help them scale their practices and meet clients’ investing
goals. Our cloud-based, digital platform supports key workflows including proposal generation, risk assessment and suitability tools,
portfolio diagnostics, multicustodial account opening, portfolio accounting, performance calculation and reconciliation, trading execution
and billing services, client reporting, sales, marketing and compliance support, and timely portfolio and market insights.
We believe our platform is at parity with or exceeds the experience
offered by many of our competitors, and our investments over the past couple of years have been designed to enhance that value. Advisors
on the platform have a wide range of investment options for their clients. We continue to offer Morningstar’s own differentiated,
proprietary investment strategies, and, over the past year we’ve added direct indexing, which offers advisors a highly scalable
and customizable approach to tax managed portfolios, and curated third-party models to the platform. Our current development focus includes
features such as customizable, practice-level business intelligence dashboards and robust multi-strategy tax-aware capabilities at the
unified managed account and household levels. The platform was voted number two for top model marketplace and number three for top TAMP
overall in Wealth Advisor’s America’s Best TAMPs, 2023 edition.
Our offering is differentiated by the strength of Morningstar’s
brand with advisors and the independent research, data, and insights that support the investment strategies we offer on the platform.
Advisors who work with us are able to differentiate their practice by integrating well-respected and unbiased research to objectively
drive investment decisions. We leverage those strengths by seeking to build trust and long-term relationships with advisors. Advisors
value this alignment and have confidence building their practices with our products as a foundation.
Morningstar Indexes
| 18. | Can you discuss a few new indices launched over the past year? |
Notable indexes launched in the past year include the Morningstar Next
Generation Artificial Intelligence Index, which offers thematic exposure to the Generative AI theme, and the Morningstar PitchBook Global
Unicorn Vertical Indexes. The Morningstar PitchBook Global Unicorn Vertical Indexes are derived from the PitchBook Global Unicorn
Indexes, which tracks privately held, late-stage venture capital-backed companies with a methodology that employes a proprietary three-factor
pricing model to estimate daily valuations. The Vertical Indexes are designed to help investors identify, track, and better understand
compelling thematic venture capital investment segments.
We also launched our Global Single Factor Index family, which provides
benchmarks for five well-known risk factors, quality, value, momentum, low volatility, and size, across various regions. The index methodology
uses the Morningstar Risk model as the source for factor definitions and exposures.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
Date: December 19, 2023 |
By: |
/s/ Jason Dubinsky |
|
|
Jason Dubinsky |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
v3.23.4
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the XBRL content amends previously-filed or accepted submission.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_AmendmentFlag |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionFor the EDGAR submission types of Form 8-K: the date of the report, the date of the earliest event reported; for the EDGAR submission types of Form N-1A: the filing date; for all other submission types: the end of the reporting or transition period. The format of the date is YYYY-MM-DD.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentPeriodEndDate |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:dateItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe type of document being provided (such as 10-K, 10-Q, 485BPOS, etc). The document type is limited to the same value as the supporting SEC submission type, or the word 'Other'.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentType |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:submissionTypeItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionAddress Line 1 such as Attn, Building Name, Street Name
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressAddressLine1 |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- Definition
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressCityOrTown |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionCode for the postal or zip code
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressPostalZipCode |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionName of the state or province.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityAddressStateOrProvince |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:stateOrProvinceItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionA unique 10-digit SEC-issued value to identify entities that have filed disclosures with the SEC. It is commonly abbreviated as CIK.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityCentralIndexKey |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:centralIndexKeyItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionIndicate if registrant meets the emerging growth company criteria.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityEmergingGrowthCompany |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionCommission file number. The field allows up to 17 characters. The prefix may contain 1-3 digits, the sequence number may contain 1-8 digits, the optional suffix may contain 1-4 characters, and the fields are separated with a hyphen.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityFileNumber |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:fileNumberItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionTwo-character EDGAR code representing the state or country of incorporation.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityIncorporationStateCountryCode |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:edgarStateCountryItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe exact name of the entity filing the report as specified in its charter, which is required by forms filed with the SEC.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityRegistrantName |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe Tax Identification Number (TIN), also known as an Employer Identification Number (EIN), is a unique 9-digit value assigned by the IRS.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityTaxIdentificationNumber |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:employerIdItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionLocal phone number for entity.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_LocalPhoneNumber |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 13e -Subsection 4c
+ Details
Name: |
dei_PreCommencementIssuerTenderOffer |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 14d -Subsection 2b
+ Details
Name: |
dei_PreCommencementTenderOffer |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionTitle of a 12(b) registered security.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b
+ Details
Name: |
dei_Security12bTitle |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:securityTitleItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionName of the Exchange on which a security is registered.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection d1-1
+ Details
Name: |
dei_SecurityExchangeName |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:edgarExchangeCodeItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Section 14a -Number 240 -Subsection 12
+ Details
Name: |
dei_SolicitingMaterial |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionTrading symbol of an instrument as listed on an exchange.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_TradingSymbol |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:tradingSymbolItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Securities Act -Number 230 -Section 425
+ Details
Name: |
dei_WrittenCommunications |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
Morningstar (NASDAQ:MORN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Morningstar (NASDAQ:MORN)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024