ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
July 29, 2010
PROXY STATEMENT
THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND THE ENCLOSED PROXY ARE BEING MAILED TO STOCKHOLDERS ON OR ABOUT JUNE 12, 2010.
The enclosed form of proxy is solicited on behalf of BE Aerospace, Inc. (the “Company”) to be voted at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in the Conference Center, 36
th
Floor, Ropes & Gray LLP, One International Place, Boston, Massachusetts at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday, July 29, 2010, or at any adjournment thereof.
If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the annual meeting, vote by proxy using the enclosed proxy card, vote by proxy over the telephone, or vote by proxy on the Internet. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the meeting and vote in person even if you have already voted by proxy.
|
·
|
To vote in person, come to the annual meeting and we will give you a ballot when you arrive.
|
|
·
|
To vote using the proxy card, simply complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card to us before the annual meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.
|
|
·
|
To vote over the telephone, dial toll-free 1-800-652-VOTE (1-800-652-8683) using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. You will be asked to provide the company number and control number from the enclosed proxy card. Your vote must be received by 1:00 a.m. Central Time, on July 29, 2010 to be counted.
|
|
·
|
To vote on the Internet, go to http://www.investorvote.com to complete an electronic proxy card. You will be asked to provide the Company number and control number from the enclosed proxy card. Your vote must be received by 1:00 a.m. Central Time, on July 29, 2010 to be counted.
|
A proxy may be revoked by a stockholder at any time before it is voted (i) by returning to the Company another properly signed proxy bearing a later date; (ii) by delivering a written revocation to the Secretary of the Company; or (iii) by attending the meeting and voting the shares represented by the proxy in person. Shares represented by the enclosed form of proxy properly executed and returned or submitted over the telephone or on the Internet, and not revoked, will be voted at the meeting by the persons named as proxies, Thomas P. McCaffrey and Ryan M. Patch.
The expense of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, the Company may use the services of its officers and other employees to solicit proxies personally and by mail, telephone and telegram from brokerage houses and other stockholders. Officers and other employees of the Company will receive no compensation in addition to their regular salaries for soliciting proxies. The Company has retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications, Inc. to assist in solicitation of proxies for a fee of $7,000 plus expenses. The Company will reimburse brokers and other persons for their reasonable charges and expenses in forwarding soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of the common stock.
In the absence of contrary instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote in accordance with the intentions stated below. The holders of record of shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value, at the close of business on June 1, 2010 are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting. As of April 27, 2010 the Company had 102,393,940 shares of common stock issued and 102,211,555 shares of common stock outstanding. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter to come before the meeting.
Consistent with Delaware state law and the Company’s by-laws, a majority of the votes entitled to be cast present in person or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum as to such matter. Votes cast by proxy or in person at the meeting will be counted by the person appointed by the Company to act as inspector of election for the meeting. The two nominees for election as directors at the meeting who receive the greatest number of votes properly cast for the election of directors, Proposal No. 1, shall be elected directors. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes in attendance at the meeting (at which a quorum is present), present in person or represented by proxy, that are properly cast, is necessary to approve the actions described in Proposals No. 2 and No. 3.
The inspector of election will count the total number of votes cast “for” approval of Proposals No. 2 and No. 3 for purposes of determining whether sufficient affirmative votes have been cast. The inspector of election will count shares (i) represented by proxies that withhold authority to vote either for the nominees for election as a director or for Proposals No. 2 and No. 3; or (ii) that reflect abstentions and “broker non-votes” as shares that are present and entitled to vote on the matter for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, but abstentions and broker non-votes will not have any effect on the outcome of voting on the election of directors or Proposals No. 2 and No. 3. “Broker non-votes” are shares represented at the meeting held by brokers or nominees as to which (i) instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote; and (ii) the broker or nominee does not have the discretionary voting power on a particular matter.
The Annual Report to Stockholders for the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 accompanies this proxy statement.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY
OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
BE Aerospace, Inc.’s Proxy Statement and Annual
Report on Form 10-K is available at
www.beaerospace.com
|
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
As provided in its charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies and recommends to the Board nominees for election and re-election to the Board and will consider nominations submitted by stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates candidates proposed by stockholders using the same criteria as for other candidates.
The Chairman of the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seek to create a Board of Directors that is strong in its collective skills and experience with respect to finance, leadership, business operations and industry knowledge. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews with the Chairman and the full Board of Directors, on an annual basis, the current composition of the Board of Directors in light of characteristics of independence, skills, experience, competency and availability of service to the Company of its members and of the Company’s anticipated needs. All of our independent directors serve on Board committees further supporting the Board by providing experience to those committees. The needs of each committee are also reviewed when considering nominees to the Board in connection with its most recent annual review. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended the nomination of Messrs. Jim C. Cowart and Arthur E. Wegner, two of our directors currently designated as Class I Directors, whose terms expire at the meeting, to serve as Class I Directors for a term of three years, expiring at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If Messrs. Cowart and Wegner are re-elected, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as well as the Chairman and the full Board believe that the Board of Directors will have an excellent Board composition of a suitable size with the appropriate diversity of skills and experience with respect to finance, leadership, business operations and industry knowledge. The biographies of Messrs. Cowart and Wegner and our continuing current directors below contain information regarding each nominee’s and continuing current directors’ experiences, qualification and skills. When the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews a potential new candidate, it looks specifically at the candidate’s qualifications in light of the size of the Board of Directors and the needs of the Board of Directors at a given point in time.
In nominating director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee strives to nominate directors that exhibit high standards of ethics, integrity, commitment and accountability. In addition, all nominations attempt to ensure that the Board of Directors shall encompass a range of talent, skills and expertise and industry experience sufficient to provide sound guidance with respect to our operations and activities.
Under our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter, directors must inform the Chairman of the Board and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in advance of accepting an invitation to serve on another public company board. In addition, no director may sit on the Board of Directors, or beneficially own more than 1% of the outstanding equity securities of any of our competitors in our principal lines of business. We also discourage our directors from serving on the board of directors of more than three public companies.
To recommend a nominee, a stockholder shall give notice to our Corporate Secretary at our registered address in Wellington, Florida. This notice should include the candidate’s brief biographical description, a statement of the qualifications of the candidate, taking into account the qualification requirements set forth above, and the candidate’s signed consent to be named in the proxy statement and to serve as a director if elected. The notice must be given not later than the earlier of (i) 50 days before the first anniversary of the last Annual Meeting of Stockholders or (ii) if less than 60 days’ notice of the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders at which directors are to be elected is given, ten days after such notice. Once we receive the recommendation, we will deliver a questionnaire to the candidate that requests additional information about the candidate’s independence, qualifications and other information that would assist the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in evaluating the candidate, as well as certain information that must be disclosed about the candidate in our proxy statement, if nominated. Candidates must complete and return the questionnaire within the time frame provided to be considered for nomination by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not received any nominations for director from stockholders for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The persons named in the enclosed proxy intend to vote each share as to which a proxy has been properly executed and returned or submitted over the telephone or on the Internet and not revoked in favor of the election as directors of the two nominees named below, each of whom is now a director of the Company, unless authority to vote for the election of any or all of such nominees is withheld by marking the proxy to that effect.
Pursuant to the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Board of Directors is divided into three classes, each as nearly equal in number as possible, so that each director (in certain circumstances after a transitional period) will serve for three years, with one class of directors being elected each year.
The nominees are Messrs. Jim C. Cowart and Arthur E. Wegner, two of our directors currently designated as Class I Directors, whose terms expire at the meeting, and until their respective successors are elected and shall qualify to serve. The enclosed proxy cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than two.
If elected, Messrs. Jim C. Cowart and Arthur E. Wegner will serve as Class I Directors for a term of three years, expiring at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and until their respective successors are elected and shall qualify to serve.
The Company expects that Messrs. Jim C. Cowart and Arthur E. Wegner will be able to serve, but if they are unable to serve, the proxies reserve discretion to vote, or refrain from voting, for a substitute nominee or nominees or to fix the number of directors at a lesser number.
Set forth below is the business experience of, and certain other information regarding, the two director nominees and the other current directors of the Company.
Director Nominees
Name, Age, Business Experience and Current Directorships
|
|
Director
Since
|
|
|
|
JIM C. COWART, 58
|
|
|
Jim C. Cowart has been a Director since November 1989. Since September 2005, Mr. Cowart has been a Director of EAG Inc., a privately held company, a predecessor of which was a company listed on the London Stock Exchange, which is a provider of micro analytic laboratory services, including surface analysis and materials characterization. Since September 2004, Mr. Cowart has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Auriga Medical Products GmbH, a distributor of medical devices. He is a Principal of Auriga Partners, Inc., a firm which provides strategic planning, competitive analysis, financial relations and other services. From August 1999 to May 2001, he was Chairman of QualPro Corporation, an aerospace components manufacturing company. From January 1993 to November 1997, he was the Chairman and CEO of Aurora Electronics Inc. Previously, Mr. Cowart was a founding general partner of Capital Resource Partners, a private investment capital manager, and he held various positions in investment banking and venture capital with Lehman Brothers, Shearson Venture Capital and Kidder, Peabody & Co. Mr. Cowart has a Professional Director Certification, earned through an extended series of director education programs sponsored by the Corporate Directors Group, an accredited organization of RiskMetrics Group. Mr. Cowart’s education, including extensive director continuing education, his business experience, including positions as Chairman and CEO of public and private companies in various industries, (including aerospace), his experience as a venture capitalist and investment banker, and his intimate knowledge of our business and industry (due to his 21 years as a member of our Board of Directors) uniquely qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
|
1989
|
ARTHUR E. WEGNER, 72
|
|
|
Arthur E. Wegner has been a Director since January 2007. Mr. Wegner retired in 2000 as Executive Vice President of Raytheon Company and Chairman of Raytheon Aircraft. He joined Raytheon Company in July 1993 as a Senior Vice President and was appointed Chairman and CEO of Raytheon’s Beech Aircraft Corporation. In September 1994, he was appointed Chairman and CEO of Raytheon Aircraft, which was formed by the merger of Raytheon subsidiaries Beech Aircraft and Raytheon Corporate Jets. He became Chairman of Raytheon Aircraft in 2000. He was elected an Executive Vice President of Raytheon Company in March 1995. Mr. Wegner joined the Raytheon Company after 20 years with United Technologies Corporation (UTC), where he was Executive Vice President and President of UTC’s Aerospace and Defense Sector. Prior to that he was President of UTC’s Pratt and Whitney Division. Mr. Wegner is a past Chairman of the Board of Directors of the General Aviation Manufacturers Association and the Aerospace Industries Association. During the course of Mr. Wegner’s career he oversaw all aspects of the business including engineering, manufacturing, supply chain and procurement, finance and human resources. These experiences together with Mr. Wegner’s educational background, his vast business experience in the aerospace industry and his intimate knowledge of our business and industry uniquely qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
|
2007
|
Current Directors
Name, Age, Business Experience and Current Directorships
|
|
Director
Since
|
|
Term
Expires
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROBERT J. KHOURY, 68
|
|
1987
|
|
2011
|
Robert J. Khoury has been a Director since July 1987, when he co-founded the Company. On December 31, 2005, Mr. Khoury retired from service as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, a position he held since August 2000. From April 1996 through August 2000, he served as Vice Chairman of the Company. Mr.
Khoury currently serves on the Board of Directors of Mar-Test, Inc., a leading provider of low-cycle fatigue testing for the aerospace and medical industries. Mr
. Khoury is the brother of Amin J. Khoury. During Mr. Khoury’s 20 year tenure as COO and/or CEO he oversaw the integration of numerous acquired businesses including the alignment of our business processes and I.T. systems across all functions, implemented lean manufacturing and oversaw the implementation of best practices in human resources. These experiences together with his intimate knowledge of our business and industry uniquely qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
JONATHAN M. SCHOFIELD, 69
|
|
2001
|
|
2011
|
Jonathan M. Schofield has been a Director since April 2001. From December 1992 through February 2000, Mr. Schofield served as Chairman and CEO of Airbus North America Holdings, a subsidiary of Airbus Industrie, a manufacturer of large civil aircraft, and served as Chairman from February 2000 until his retirement in March 2001. Prior to 1989 Mr. Schofield served in various executive positions at Pratt & Whitney, a division of United Technologies Corporation. From 1989 until he joined Airbus, Mr. Schofield was President of United Technologies International Corporation. Mr. Schofield is currently a member of the Board of Directors of Aero Sat, Inc., Nordam Group, and TurboCombustor Technology, Inc. and is a trustee of LIFT Trust. Mr. Schofield’s education, aerospace industry business experience including his role as chairman and CEO of Airbus North America, and as President of United Technologies International during which he developed and executed global marketing strategies and interfaced with procurement, finance and human resources together with his intimate knowledge of our business and industry uniquely qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
CHARLES L. CHADWELL, 69
|
|
2007
|
|
2012
|
Charles L. Chadwell has been a Director since January 2007. Until his retirement in 2002, he was the Vice President and General Manager of Commercial Engine Operations for GE Aircraft Engines. After joining General Electric in 1965, he held a variety of management positions, including: Program Manager, CF6-80C program; Plant Manager, GE Aircraft Engines’ Wilmington, North Carolina plant; General Manager, GE Aircraft Engines Sourcing Operations; General Manager, Production Operations, GE Aircraft Engines’ Lynn, Massachusetts plant; Vice President, GE Aircraft Engines Human Resources; and Vice President and General Manager, Production and Procurement, GE Aircraft Engines. Mr. Chadwell currently serves on the Boards of Directors of Spirit AeroSystems Holdings Inc. and Parkway Products Inc. and serves as Chairman of the Board of PaR Systems. Mr. Chadwell’s education and business experience, including his senior management roles with General Electric in human resources, production and procurement, program management, and as a general manager with oversight responsibilities for engineering, supply chain and procurement, production, finance and human resources, as well as his intimate knowledge of our business and industry qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
RICHARD G. HAMERMESH, 62
|
|
1987
|
|
2012
|
Richard G. Hamermesh has been a Director since July 1987. Dr. Hamermesh has been a Professor of Management Practice at Harvard Business School since July 1, 2002. From 1987 to 2001, he was a co-founder and a Managing Partner of The Center for Executive Development, an executive education and development consulting firm. From 1976 to 1987, Dr. Hamermesh was a member of the faculty of Harvard Business School. He is also an active investor and entrepreneur, having participated as a principal, director and investor in the founding and early stages of more than 15 organizations. Dr. Hamermesh’s education and business experience as co-founder of a leading executive education and consulting firm, as president, founder, director and co-investor in over 15 early stage businesses, and his 24 years as a Professor of Management Practice at Harvard Business School where he has led MBA candidates through literally thousands of business case studies, as well as his intimate knowledge of our business and industry (including over 23 years as a member of our Board) uniquely qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
AMIN J. KHOURY, 71
|
|
1987
|
|
2012
|
Amin J. Khoury has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors since July 1987 when he was the principal founder of the Company. Effective December 31, 2005, Mr. Amin J. Khoury was appointed Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Amin J. Khoury also served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer from September, 1987 until April 1, 1996. Since 1986, Mr. Khoury has been a director of Synthes, Inc., the world’s leading manufacturer and marketer of orthopedic trauma implants and a leading global manufacturer and marketer of cranial maxillofacial and spine implants. Mr. Khoury has a Professional Director Certification, earned through an extended series of director education programs sponsored by the Corporate Directors Group, an accredited organization of RiskMetrics Group. Mr. Khoury’s education, his business experience, which includes having co-founded our Company and serving as Chairman and CEO since 1987, during which he was primarily responsible for the development and execution of our business strategies which resulted in the growth in our business from a single product line business with $3.5 million in annual sales, to the leading global manufacturer of commercial aircraft and business jet cabin interior products and the world’s leading distributor of consumable products, with annual revenues in 2009 in excess of $1.9 billion.
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Khoury has led both our acquisition strategy and our operational integration and execution strategies. He is a highly effective leader in organizational design and development matters and has been instrumental in identifying and attracting both the managerial talent and Board members who currently serve the Company. He has an intimate knowledge of the Company, its industry and its competitors which he has gained over the last 23 years, all of which uniquely qualify him to serve as our Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees
The Board of Directors held 4 meetings during 2009. All of the current directors attended all of the meetings. The Board of Directors currently has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee. Each current director attended all of the meetings of the committees of the Board of Directors on which they served during 2009. All members of our Board of Directors attended the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Chadwell, Cowart, Hamermesh, Schofield and Wegner are independent under NASDAQ rules.
The Audit Committee is currently composed of Messrs. Cowart, Hamermesh and Wegner, with Mr. Cowart acting as Chairman. The Audit Committee held 6 meetings during 2009. The Audit Committee is responsible for: (i) the appointment, compensation and oversight of our independent auditors; (ii) overseeing the quality and integrity of our financial statements and related disclosures; (iii) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iv) assessing our independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and performance; and (v) monitoring the performance of our internal audit and control functions.
All members of the Audit Committee are independent under NASDAQ and SEC rules. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by and approved by our Board of Directors.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is currently composed of Messrs. Chadwell, Cowart, Hamermesh, Schofield and Wegner. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held one meeting during 2009. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, assisting the Board of Directors by actively identifying individuals qualified to become Board members and recommending to the Board the director nominees for election at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and making recommendations with respect to corporate governance matters. All of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent as defined by current NASDAQ rules. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter adopted and approved by our Board of Directors. All of the members of the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee support the nominations of Messrs. Cowart and Wegner.
The Compensation Committee is currently composed of Messrs. Chadwell and Schofield. The Compensation Committee held 6 meetings during 2009. The Compensation Committee provides recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding compensation matters and oversees the Company’s incentive and compensation plans. All of the members of the Compensation Committee are independent as defined by NASDAQ rules. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted and approved by our Board of Directors.
The Compensation Committee is not authorized to delegate any of its authority described herein to any other persons (other than a subcommittee). Our CEO, COO and CFO attended portions of some or all of the Compensation Committee meetings during 2009 at the invitation of the Compensation Committee. Management input was taken into consideration in assessing the performance and pay levels of our key management employees as well as the establishment of bonus measures and targets. Our Vice President-Law & General Counsel and our Vice President-Human Resources also attended selected meetings during 2009 to provide the Compensation Committee with information to consider in respect to various areas in which they have expertise. Our Vice President-Law & General Counsel also serves as secretary to the Compensation Committee. On no occasion were any of our named executive officers involved in any discussion specifically relating to their own compensation, other than our CEO, who discussed both his performance and his compensation directly with our Compensation Committee.
Copies of the charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are available on our website, www.beaerospace.com, in the Investor Relations section.
Board Diversity
The Chairman of the Board of Directors together with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in accordance with the Board’s governance principles, seeks to create a Board that as a whole is strong in its collective knowledge and has a diversity of skills and experience with respect to industry knowledge, vision and strategy, human resource management, general management and leadership, marketing, business operations, business judgment, crisis management, risk assessment, accounting and finance, capital markets, general corporate governance and global markets.
In considering candidates for the Board of Directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the entirety of each candidate’s credentials in the context of these standards. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes our Board of Directors has achieved its diversity objectives as evidenced by Board Members with extensive experience in general management, human resources, manufacturing operations, marketing, engineering, capital markets, developing and executing mergers and acquisition strategies, including successful integration activities related thereto, as founders or co-founders of a multitude of businesses, and the collective experiences developed during their business careers which total over 200 years in the
aerospace, defense and related industries
.
Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors has an active role in overseeing the risk management of the Company with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company. The Board’s oversight of risk management is designed to support the achievement of the strategic objectives of the Company and increase stockholder value. A fundamental part of risk management for the Company is not only understanding the risks that are faced by the Company and the steps necessary to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for the Company. The Company's Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and other members of senior management regularly evaluate and report to the Board on significant risks facing the Company. In addition, each committee of the Board of Directors is also responsible for assessing the risk exposure related to its specific area. The committees discuss matters of interest with the Company’s senior management and report to the full Board as appropriate, including when a matter rises to the level of a material or enterprise level risk.
Board Leadership Structure
The Board of Directors believes that the Company and its stockholders have been and will continue to be well served by having the Company’s principal founder and Chief Executive Officer serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Khoury has led both our acquisition strategy and our operational integration and execution strategy. He is a highly effective leader in organizational design and development matters and has been instrumental in identifying and attracting both the managerial talent and board members who currently serve the Company. He has an intimate knowledge of the Company, its industry and its competitors which he has gained over the last 23 years, all of which uniquely qualify him to serve as our Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors believes that the current leadership of the Board, when combined with the other elements of our corporate governance structure, strikes an appropriate balance between strong and consistent leadership and independent oversight of the Company’s business and affairs.
The Board of Directors is composed of a majority of independent directors. The Company’s Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee are each composed solely of independent directors. The Company’s independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside the Company, while the Chief Executive Officer brings industry, competitive and company-specific experience and expertise. The Board believes the combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer promotes unified leadership and direction for the Company, which allows for a single, clear focus for management to execute the Company’s strategy and business plans. Notwithstanding the above, the Board recognizes that, in the future, circumstances may necessitate that the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer be separated and, therefore, the Board retains the authority to separate the roles if it were to determine that such a division might be appropriate in the future.
One of the key responsibilities of the Board is to assist management to develop strategic direction and then to hold management accountable for the execution of strategy once it is developed. The Board believes, at this time, the combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, together with the independent directors, is in the best interest of stockholders because it provides the appropriate balance between strategy development and independent oversight of management.
While the Board has not formally appointed a lead independent director, the Board believes that the current composition of the Board of Directors and the functioning of the independent directors effectively maintain independent oversight of the Company’s management. Five out of seven of the Company’s directors are independent and the chair and members of each of the Company’s Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee are independent directors. As a result, independent directors oversee all significant matters affecting the Company, including the Company’s financial statements, executive compensation matters, the nomination and assessment of directors and the risk management practices. Independent directors meet in regular executive sessions not attended by the non-independent directors and management in conjunction with each regular Board meeting and as they otherwise deem appropriate. At each executive session, the respective chair of the Board committee relating to the specific matter discussed by the independent directors leads the discussion. For example, the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee leads the discussions with respect to director nominations, the current composition of the Board of Directors and other Board policy matters.
Following each executive session, the independent directors report the results of the discussions to the full Board as appropriate. These discussions are led by the appropriate committee chair.
Additional executive sessions may be convened at any time at the request of an independent director, and, in such event, the independent director chairperson of the most closely associated committee to the discussed topic leads the discussion and the report to the full Board. During executive sessions directors also discuss and propose matters to be included in the agenda for future Board meetings.
To gain a perspective on external pay levels, emerging practices and regulatory changes, our Compensation Committee engages an outside executive compensation consultant to provide benchmark and survey information and advise the Compensation Committee as it conducts its review of our compensation process. The Compensation Committee selected Mercer Human Resource Consulting (“Mercer”) as its consultant for 2009 and tasked them with gathering market competitive data, reviewing compensation plan design alternatives and instructing the Compensation Committee on compensation trends and best practices. As a result, Mercer periodically participated in Compensation Committee meetings, and they also provided the Compensation Committee with specialized advice to consider in establishing and evaluating our compensation practices. No member of management has engaged Mercer to advise them on executive compensation matters. Further, Mercer has not been engaged to advise the Company or its management on any other matters. Mercer reports directly to the Compensation Committee. The activities of the Compensation Committee related to Mercer were led by the chair of the Compensation Committee. Greater detail regarding our compensation process is set forth below in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Stockholder Communications
with Our Board of Directors
To facilitate the ability of stockholders to communicate with our Board of Directors, we have established an electronic mailing address and a physical mailing address to which communications may be sent: directors@beaerospace.com, or The Board of Directors, c/o The Corporate Secretary, BE Aerospace, Inc., 1400 Corporate Center Way, Wellington, Florida 33414.
Our Corporate Secretary
reviews all correspondence addressed to the Board of Directors and regularly presents to the Board of Directors a summary of all such correspondence and forwards to the Board of Directors or individual directors, as the case may be, copies of all correspondence that, in the opinion of the Corporate Secretary, deals with the functions of the Board of Directors or committees thereof or that he otherwise determines requires their attention. Examples of communications that would be logged, but not automatically forwarded, include solicitations for products and services or items of a personal nature not relevant to us or our stockholders. Directors may at any time review the log of all correspondence received by our Company that is addressed to members of the Board of Directors and request copies of any such correspondence. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are brought to the attention of the Audit Committee, other than potential ethical or conflict of interest situations, which are directed to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No person who is or has been an officer or other employee of the Company served as a member of the Company’s Compensation Committee. No executive officer of the Company served as a member of the Compensation Committee on the board (or as a director) of any company where an executive officer of such company is a member of the Compensation Committee or a director of the Company. No member of the Compensation Committee was a party to any transaction required to be disclosed as a related person transaction.
Compensation of Directors
Directors who are employees of the Company receive no additional compensation for serving on the Company’s Board of Directors. Directors who were not employees of the Company during 2009 received an annual retainer of $
80,000 of which $50,000 was paid in cash and $30,000 was paid in deferred shares of our common stock pursuant to our Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Plan (as amended, the “Directors Plan”).
In addition, the chairs of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also received additional annual
cash
retainers of $10,000, $10,000 and $5,000, respectively.
In addition, each non-employee director received $2,000 in cash for each committee meeting attended, or written unanimous consent acted upon. All cash payments are made quarterly in arrears.
Non-employee directors also received an annual grant of restricted stock with a fair market value of $40,000 during 2009 pursuant to our 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The grants vest on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant, provided the director remains in continuous service through the applicable vesting period.
Up to 100% of the directors’ cash and stock retainers may be deferred pursuant to
the Directors Plan.
The deferred cash compensation or shares of common stock are held in an account under the Directors Plan until the termination of the director’s service and are paid in a
cash
lump-sum or in up to five annual installments, as elected by the director. The directors are fully vested in the deferred shares at all times but have no rights as stockholders until distribution. In the event of a change of control (as defined in the Directors Plan), the share accounts under the Directors Plan will
immediately
be distributed to the directors
.
We reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable business and travel expenses incurred in connection with their service on the Board of Directors. In addition, non-employee directors are eligible to participate in our health and business travel accident insurance program
on the same terms and conditions as employees generally
.
We do not provide our directors with any other perquisites or special benefits for their service on our Board.
Director compensation is
recommended
by the Compensation Committee and approved by the entire Board of Directors.
Modifications to Non-Employee Director Compensation in 2010.
In 2009, we engaged
Mercer,
an independent third-party consultant
,
to review our non-employee directors’ compensation program to ensure that our program is
(i)
competitive with current market practices and trends;
(ii)
consistent with the principles of good governance, and
(iii)
aligned with the interests of our stockholders
. In conducting this review, we
used the same
peer group we use with respect to executive officer
compensation
as described below in our
“
Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
”
The 2009 review indicated that our non-employee directors’ total compensation was below that of our peer group. As a result, on February 24, 2010, we adjusted our
annual
non-employee director compensation program to provide
:
|
·
|
$85,000 annual cash retainer;
|
|
·
|
$30,000 deferred stock retainer;
|
|
·
|
$10,000 Audit Committee and Compensation Committee chairperson retainers;
|
|
·
|
$5,000 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee chairperson retainer; and
|
|
·
|
$45,000 grant of restricted stock, which will vest in four equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of each grant.
|
Consulting Arrangement with Robert J. Khoury.
Effective January 1, 2006, upon his retirement as our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Khoury entered into a consulting agreement with us pursuant to which he agreed to provide certain specified services to us through December 31, 2011, including sales and marketing services, assistance in developing and implementing key customer strategies, advice and consultation regarding operational matters of the Company and maintenance of key customer relationships through periodic customer visits. In consideration for the consulting services, Mr. Khoury receives a consulting fee of $263,300 per calendar year. He is also entitled to an office, secretarial support and air travel in accordance with past practices under our travel policy. The consulting agreement may not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior written consent of both parties. If Mr. Khoury ceases to provide the consulting services as a result of his death or disability, he or his estate will be entitled to a lump-sum payment equal to the consulting fees payable through the remainder of the consulting period. As a member of the Board, Mr. Khoury is also entitled to receive all compensation paid to our non-employee directors.
The
following table
summarizes the compensation paid to our non-employee directors in 2009:
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
Stock
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
(g)
|
|
(h)
|
Charles L. Chadwell
|
53,500
|
|
82,850
|
|
--
|
|
136,350
|
Jim C. Cowart
|
44,000
|
|
100,479
|
|
--
|
|
144,479
|
Richard G. Hamermesh
|
64,000
|
|
70,232
|
|
--
|
|
134,232
|
Robert J. Khoury
|
50,000
|
|
70,250
|
|
331,201
|
(3)
|
451,451
|
Jonathan M. Schofield
|
81,000
|
|
70,232
|
|
--
|
|
151,232
|
Arthur E. Wegner
|
64,000
|
|
70,250
|
|
--
|
|
134,250
|
|
Includes all cash retainers and meeting fees earned by our non-employee directors as described above.
|
|
The amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column represent the aggregate full
grant date fair value of the restricted
stock awards
calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (without any reduction for risk of forfeiture) as determined based on applying the assumptions used in our financial statements.
|
|
The amount reported for Mr. Robert J. Khoury for 2009 includes payments under a consulting agreement he entered into upon his retirement of $263,300; personal use of the Company aircraft of $48,009 and executive medical coverage of $19,892. The aggregate incremental cost for the use of the Company aircraft for personal travel is calculated by multiplying the hourly variable cost rate for the aircraft by the hours used. The hourly variable cost rate includes costs such as fuel, oil, parking/landing fees, crew expenses and catering. The terms of our executive medical plan are set forth below in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
|
As of December 31, 2009, the aggregate number of outstanding deferred shares and restricted stock awards held by each non-employee director was as follows:
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
Charles L. Chadwell
|
|
|
6,482
|
|
|
|
6,106
|
|
Jim C. Cowart
|
|
|
8,099
|
|
|
|
6,502
|
|
Richard G. Hamermesh
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
6,502
|
|
Robert J. Khoury
|
|
|
6,094
|
|
|
|
6,504
|
|
Jonathan M. Schofield
|
|
|
4,049
|
|
|
|
6,502
|
|
Arthur E. Wegner
|
|
|
4,794
|
|
|
|
6,106
|
|
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of our independent auditors, overseeing the quality and integrity of our financial statements and related disclosures, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, assessing our independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and performance, and monitoring the performance of our internal audit and control functions. The Audit Committee is currently composed of three directors: Messrs. Cowart, Hamermesh and Wegner, and operates under a written charter adopted and approved by the Board of Directors, which is available on our website at www.beaerospace.com in the Investor Relations section. Mr. Cowart currently chairs the Audit Committee.
Our Audit Committee is a separately designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All three current directors serving on the Audit Committee are independent committee members as defined by NASDAQ and SEC rules. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Cowart is an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with SEC rules.
Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
Management is responsible for the financial reporting process, including the system of internal control and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company’s independent auditors are responsible for auditing those financial statements. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and review these processes. We rely, without independent verification, on the information provided to us and on the representations made by management and the independent auditors.
We have reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for 2009 with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.
The Audit Committee discussed and reviewed with Deloitte & Touche LLP all communications required by generally accepted auditing standards, including, among other things, the matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Standard AU 380, “Communication with Audit Committees,” and Statement on Auditing Standards No. 114, “The Auditor’s Communication with Those Charged with Governance,” and discussed and reviewed the results of Deloitte & Touche LLP’s audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee also discussed the results of internal audit examinations.
The Company’s independent auditors also provided to us the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and we discussed with the independent auditors their independence from the Company. When considering Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence, we considered whether their provision of services to the Company beyond those rendered in connection with their audit and review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements was consistent with maintaining their independence. We also reviewed, among other things, the amount of fees paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP for audit and non-audit services.
Based on our review and these meetings, discussions and reports, and subject to the limitations on our role and responsibilities referred to above and in the Audit Committee Charter, we have recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for 2009 be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
With respect to the above matters, the Audit Committee submits this report.
|
|
Audit Committee
|
|
|
|
Jim C. Cowart
|
|
Richard G. Hamermesh
|
|
Arthur E. Wegner
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table and notes thereto set forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock as of April 27, 2010, except as otherwise noted, by (i) each person who is known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company; (ii) each of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the four other most highly paid executive officers in 2009; (iii) each of the Company’s directors; and (iv) all of the Company’s executive officers and directors as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, each of the stockholders named below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock beneficially owned:
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Benefically Owned
|
|
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Wellington Management
|
|
|
14,104,386
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
13.95
|
%
|
75 State Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, MA 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc
|
|
|
7,574,868
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
7.49
|
%
|
40 East 52nd Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Honeywell International Inc
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
6.06
|
%
|
101 Columbia Road,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morristown, NJ 07962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR LLC
|
|
|
5,566,700
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
82 Devonshire Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, MA 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amin J. Khoury+*
|
|
|
532,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
Thomas P. McCaffrey+
|
|
|
229,937
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
**
|
|
Jim C. Cowart*
|
|
|
186,920
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
**
|
|
Michael B. Baughan+
|
|
|
173,613
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
**
|
|
Werner Lieberherr+
|
|
|
114,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
Wayne Exton+
|
|
|
89,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
Ryan Patch+
|
|
|
85,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johnathan M. Schofield*
|
|
|
70,357
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
**
|
|
Robert J. Khoury*
|
|
|
30,641
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
|
**
|
|
Richard G. Hamermesh*
|
|
|
25,517
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
**
|
|
Arthur E. Wegner*
|
|
|
17,549
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
**
|
|
Charles L. Chadwell*
|
|
|
15,341
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
|
**
|
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (14 Persons)
|
|
|
1,699,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ Named executive officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Director of the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Less than 1 percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The number of shares of our common stock deemed outstanding includes: (i) 102,211,555 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 27, 2010 and (ii) 2,000 shares of common stock subject to outstanding stock options which are currently exercisable by the named individual or group.
|
(2)
|
Based on information in the Schedule 13G, as of December 31, 2009, filed on February 12, 2010 by Wellington Management Company, reported shared voting power over 11,018,394 shares and shared dispositive power over 14,104,386 shares. The Company has not attempted to independently verify any of the foregoing information, which is based solely upon the information contained in the Schedule 13G. The percent of outstanding shares set forth above is based on the number of our shares outstanding as of that date.
|
(3)
|
Based on information in the Schedule 13G, as of December 31, 2009, filed on January 29, 2010 by BlackRock, Inc., reported sole voting and sole dispositive power over 7,574,868 shares . The Company has not attempted to independently verify any of the foregoing information, which is based solely upon the information contained in the Schedule 13G. The percent of outstanding shares set forth above is based on the number of our shares outstanding as of that date.
|
(4)
|
Based on information in the Schedule 13G, as of July 28, 2008, filed on August 4, 2008 by Honeywell International Inc., reported sole voting and dispositive power over 750,741 shares and shared voting and dispositive power over 6,000,000 shares. The Company has not attempted to independently verify any of the foregoing information, which is based solely upon the information contained in the Schedule 13G. The percent of outstanding shares set forth above is based on the number of our shares outstanding as of that date.
|
(5)
|
Based on information in the Schedule 13G, as of December 31, 2009, filed on February 16, 2010 by FMR LLC, reported sole voting power over 3,021,400 shares and sole dispositive power over 5,566,700 shares. The Company has not attempted to independently verify any of the foregoing information, which is based solely upon the information contained in the Schedule 13G. The percent of outstanding shares set forth above is based on the number of our shares outstanding as of that date.
|
(6)
|
Includes 7,618 shares owned pursuant to the Company’s 401(k) Plan and 5,400 shares indirectly owned.
|
(7)
|
Includes 4,707 shares owned pursuant to the Company’s Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Plan.
|
(8)
|
Includes 108 shares owned pursuant to the Company’s 401(k) Plan.
|
(9)
|
Includes 2,353 shares owned pursuant to the Company’s Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Plan.
|
(10)
|
Includes 2,353 shares owned pursuant to the Company’s Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Plan and 5,000 shares indirectly owned.
|
(11)
|
Includes 2,353 shares owned pursuant to the Company’s Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Plan and 2,000 shares indirectly owned.
|
(12)
|
Includes 2,353 shares owned pursuant to the Company’s Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Plan.
|
(13)
|
Includes 3,334 shares owned pursuant to the Company’s Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Plan.
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS
The Objectives of Our Named Executive Officer Compensation Program
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis addresses the objectives and elements of our executive compensation program, how our Compensation Committee uses external information to assist their oversight of our executive compensation and how we measure individual and Company performance.
The objectives of our 2009 executive compensation program were as follows:
|
·
|
Provide a total compensation opportunity that is competitive with the market for executive talent, thereby enabling us to attract, retain and motivate our executives;
|
|
·
|
Ensure a strong relationship between pay and performance, including rewards for results that meet or exceed performance targets, and consequences for results that are below performance targets; and
|
|
·
|
Align executive and stockholder interests through the provision of long-term incentives that link executive compensation to strategic and intrinsic value creation.
|
Our Named Executive Officers
Our named executive officers include our six most highly compensated executives during 2009, consisting of:
|
·
|
Amin J. Khoury, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer;
|
|
·
|
Michael B. Baughan, President and Chief Operating Officer;
|
|
·
|
Thomas P. McCaffrey, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
|
|
·
|
Wayne Exton, Vice President and General Manager–Business Jet Segment;
|
|
·
|
Werner Lieberherr, Vice President and General Manager–Commercial Aircraft Products Segment;
|
|
·
|
Ryan M. Patch, Vice President – Law, General Counsel and Secretary.
|
What Our Compensation Is Intended to Reward
Company Performance
.
Through the provision of short-term and long-term incentives, our 2009 executive compensation program was designed to reward: (i) the achievement of short-term financial goals measuring operating earnings, cash flows, operating expense management and operating margins, and (ii) the execution of our long-term strategic goals and objectives. We believe that aggressive cost management initiatives, operating margin expansion (exclusive of foreign exchange effects and acquisition, integration and transition costs in both periods), strong cash flows and substantially completing the acquisition of Honeywell Consumables Solutions (“HCS”) were the key short-term drivers of intrinsic value creation during 2009. We believe our stock was one of the best performing aerospace stocks for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our share price performed poorly in 2008, at a time when the financial markets were roiled by the global financial crisis and our shares traded at levels which we believe were inconsistent with their intrinsic value. On February 25, 2008 the
Wall Street Journal
reported that over the one - three - and five-year periods ending December 31, 2007, the Company’s stock was the best performing public aerospace stock. We believe that short-term fluctuations in stock price do not necessarily reflect the underlying strength or future prospects of the Company, and accordingly, we
do not
emphasize year-to-year changes in stock price in our evaluation of corporate performance. On a longer term basis we believe stockholder value is created through the successful execution of sound business strategy.
Our business strategy includes maintenance of a global market leadership position and to best serve our customers by:
|
·
|
Offering the broadest and most innovative products and services in the industry;
|
|
·
|
Offering a broad range of engineering services, including design, integration, installation and certification services and aircraft reconfiguration;
|
|
·
|
Pursuing the highest level of quality in every facet of our operations, from the factory floor to customer support;
|
|
·
|
Aggressively pursuing continuous improvement initiatives in all facets of our businesses, and in particular our manufacturing operations, to reduce cycle time, lower cost, improve quality and expand our margins; and
|
|
·
|
Pursuing a worldwide marketing and product support approach focused by airline and general aviation airframe manufacturers and encompassing our entire product line.
|
Our Compensation Committee performs annual reviews of our performance and the contributions of our named executive officers to ensure that our executive compensation program rewards the achievement of our financial objectives and the execution of our business strategy. We believe our executive compensation program is reasonable and provides appropriate incentives to our
executives to achieve our corporate objectives without encouraging them to take excessive risks for short-term gains in their business decisions.
Individual Performance
.
In addition to overall Company performance, our compensation program rewards individual performance toward the attainment of our goals and objectives. In setting the targeted pay levels of the named executive officers, a variety of factors are considered, including: competencies, skills, prior experience, scope of responsibility and accountability within the organization.
On an annual basis, each named executive officer’s attainment of goals and demonstration of defined leadership competencies is assessed by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer through our leadership performance and development assessment process. Each year, our CEO recommends to the Compensation Committee (i) proposed base salary increases; (ii) proposed cash incentive awards for each of our named executive officers for the preceding year; and (iii) proposed long-term equity incentives for each of our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee performs a similar assessment of our CEO and approves his compensation program.
The Elements of our Compensation Program
At the beginning of each year the Compensation Committee determines the targeted range of compensation levels which may be earned by each named executive officer. In February 2009, the Compensation Committee approved 2009 compensation for our named executive officers (depending on their title and position) in the following forms and percentages:
|
·
|
Base salary (approximately 20%-29% of total targeted compensation);
|
|
·
|
Cash incentives (approximately 24%-35% of total targeted compensation); and
|
|
·
|
Long-term equity incentives (approximately 37%-55% of total targeted compensation).
|
The aggregate total targeted maximum incentive compensation approved in February 2009, expressed as a percentage of annual base salary, for each named executive officer (depending on title and position) was as follows for 2009: performance-based cash incentives (100%-120%) and long-term equity incentives (125%-270%).
Due to the global financial crisis and the first actual decline in GDP since the Great Depression; economic conditions in our industry changed dramatically in the first quarter of 2009 making the financial metrics which drive our annual cash incentive compensation unrealistic and irrelevant. As a result, in April 2009, our Compensation Committee modified our Management Incentive Plan (MIP) to (i) adjust the financial performance criteria to reflect our amended 2009 financial plan approved by our Board of Directors on April 28, 2009, and (ii) reduce the targeted payments under the MIP by approximately 50% for all participants, including our named executive officers. As a result, the forms and percentages of 2009 compensation were modified as follows:
|
·
|
Base salary (approximately 24%-37% of total targeted compensation);
|
|
·
|
Annual cash incentives (approximately 12%-18% of total targeted compensation); and
|
|
·
|
Long-term equity incentives (approximately 45%-65% of total targeted compensation).
|
The approximate aggregate total targeted maximum incentive compensation, expressed as a percentage of annual base salary, for each named executive officer (depending on title and position) was as follows for 2009: performance-based cash incentives (40%-50%) and long-term equity incentives (120%-270%).
Base Salary
.
We provide each of our named executive officers with a competitive fixed annual base salary. The base salaries for our named executive officers are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee, taking into account the results achieved by the executive, the executive’s future potential, scope of responsibilities and experience, and competitive salary practices. Employment agreements entered into with our named executive officers provide for an annual cost of living increase or as detemined by our Compensation Committee. Any adjustments to base salaries for all our employees are generally made as of July 1st of each year.
We believe that it is important to pay a base salary that is consistent with similarly sized industry peers with similar continuous performance characteristics. In 2009, base salary increases for our named executive officers, exclusive of increases associated with promotions and changes in responsibilities, were approximately 2% of their 2008 base salaries. Mr. Patch received an increase of approximately 11% to reflect his promotion to General Counsel and his expanded scope of responsibilities. As more fully described under the heading “External Benchmarking” below, these increases generally positioned our named executive officers’ base salary levels approximated the 75
th
percentile of the base salaries of executives in comparable positions in the peer group.
Annual Cash Incentives
.
Management Incentive Plan.
Our named executive officers were eligible to receive annual cash incentives (bonuses) pursuant to our MIP, based on the attainment of both Company and individual performance goals. We believe that directly linking a significant portion of our named executive officers’ cash compensation to an individual segment or aggregate corporate performance (as applicable) is an important factor in achieving our corporate objectives.
In February 2009, the Compensation Committee assigned each of our named executive officers a target incentive payment under the MIP, reflected as a percentage of base salary (as set forth below). Payments under the MIP are based upon the achievement of two components: financial performance objectives (weighted at 80%) and individual strategic initiatives (weighted at 20%).
For Messrs. Khoury, Baughan, McCaffrey and Patch the financial performance objectives are based solely on Company performance. For Messrs. Lieberherr and Exton, the performance objectives are based on business segment performance.
With respect to the financial performance objectives (which govern 80% of the incentive payments), in general, no payment will be made under the MIP with respect to a particular performance objective unless the Company or the participant’s business segment, as applicable, exceeds 80% of the applicable performance target. Incentive payments for performance between 80% and 90% of the performance target cannot exceed 10% of the targeted payment.
With respect to the individual strategic initiatives (which govern 20% of the incentive payments), under the MIP, the actual cash incentive payments made to each participant (other than our CEO) are determined by our Compensation Committee based on our CEO’s assessment of each participant’s contribution toward the attainment of specific Company-wide or segment specific goals, as appropriate, individual goals and the demonstration of defined leadership competencies. Following the review of the CEO’s recommendations, the Compensation Committee approves the final MIP awards, which may be higher or lower than the amount determined as a result of the attainment of the financial performance objectives described above. The Compensation Committee performs a similar performance assessment of our CEO and approves his MIP award based on this assessment.
If the Company or a named executive officer’s business unit achieved 100% or more of the target performance and the named executive officer’s individual performance is at a superior level, the named executive officer will be eligible to receive amounts in excess of targeted amounts, not to exceed 120% of the target unless otherwise specifically approved by the Compensation Committee.
2009 Financial Performance Objectives.
The 2009 corporate financial performance objectives based on Company performance, weighting and performance targets were as follows:
Financial Performance Objective
|
|
Weight
|
|
2009 Target
|
Ÿ
Operating Earnings
|
|
30%
|
|
~$295 million
|
Ÿ
Operating Cash Flow
|
|
30%
|
|
~$192 million
|
Ÿ
Operating Margin (exclusive of foreign exchange impacts)
|
|
20%
|
|
16.9%
|
Ÿ
Operating Expense Management
|
|
20%
|
|
~$375 million
|
These financial performance objectives are evaluated on an annual basis to ensure we measure what we believe are the most relevant business measures of total business performance. The performance goals are established as part of our annual financial planning process and are the measure against which all MIP participants’ performance is measured. We do not disclose the specific business segment targets since they contain competitively sensitive information and the specific targets are not material to an understanding of incentive compensation awards to the named executive officers. However, we believe each of the business segment targets is appropriate and obtainable.
The Compensation Committee may approve adjustments to the corporate or business segment performance objectives to recognize corporate or segment contributions, particularly in situations where such contributions may have been in conflict with the shorter term financial objectives measured by our MIP. The Compensation Committee also uses their judgment to exclude the impact of non-recurring gains, charges or unusual items as facts and circumstances dictate.
Attainment of 2009 Performance Objectives
.
2009 was a turbulent year for our industry. Global air travel was down approximately 4.5%, the largest decline on record and reflects an actual decrease in global gross domestic product, the first negative growth for the global economy since the Great Depression. Airline revenues fell precipitously, resulting in approximately $11 billion in global airline losses and causing significant global capacity reductions.
Airlines, aircraft OEM’s, subcontractors and MRO’s all implemented stringent cash conservation measures, which resulted in the deferral of fleet refurbishment programs and a massive destocking of consumables and spare parts. This destocking continued for most of the year, resulting in an approximately 30% decrease in demand for commercial aircraft spares and consumables products.
Since July 2008 we have reduced our headcount by approximately 24%. Additionally, the cost synergies associated with our ongoing integration of HCS, combined with the continued success of our corporate-wide lean and supply chain initiatives, have further reduced our cost structure. For example, our 2009 operating margin, adjusted to exclude foreign exchange effects and acquisition, integration and transition costs was 16.8% and expanded by 100 basis points as compared to 2008, similarly adjusted. This was in spite of a 21% reduction in revenues.
In addition to successful cost management strategies during 2009, we made major strides towards completing the integration of HCS, maintained our research and development spending on key initiatives, maintained or expanded our market shares in each of our key product offerings, completed the inventory investments required to conform HCS to our consumables management segment business inventory stocking model, generated healthy free cash flows in the second half of the year, prepaid $100 million of long-term debt and improved our net debt to capital ratio by 470 basis points to 38%. We believe management performed well in a very difficult environment.
The following is a summary of our Company financial performance during 2009 against the objectives set by the Compensation Committee under the MIP. Comparisons with 2008 are exclusive of a pre-tax impairment charge related to goodwill and intangible assets in 2008:
|
·
|
Operating earnings of approximately $296 million decreased by approximately $58 million as compared to 2008. During 2009 we generated operating earnings which were 100% of our 2009 performance target;
|
|
·
|
Operating cash flow of approximately $207 million increased by approximately $47 million as compared to 2008 and was 108% of our 2009 target;
|
|
·
|
Operating margin was 15.3% in 2009. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange and acquisition integration and transition costs in both years, 2009 adjusted operating margin was 16.8%, or 100 basis points greater than 2008 and was 99% of our 2009 target; and was achieved despite a 8.2% reduction in sales, and;
|
|
·
|
We achieved 101% of our 2009 operating expense management target.
|
On February 1, 2010, the Compensation Committee concluded that we exceeded our 2009 Company and business segment financial performance targets. Considering these results, achievement of our strategic objectives as well as certain qualitative factors which the Compensation Committee considers an important part of its assessment (such as expanding our market shares, demonstrating market share leadership, advances in new product development and strengthening our balance sheet), and taking into account each named executive officer’s individual performance against their goals and the success of their respective segments of our Company, as applicable, the Compensation Committee determined an aggregate cash incentive award for each of our named executive officers equal to approximately 100% of the total aggregate targeted annual cash incentive opportunity. The Compensation Committee approved 2009 annual cash incentive payments
to our named executive officers
, expressed as a percentage of base salary
as follows:
|
Executive Officer
|
|
Percentage of
Base Salary
|
|
|
Dollar Amount
|
|
|
Ÿ
Amin J. Khoury
|
|
|
49%
|
|
|
|
$525,000
|
|
|
Ÿ
Michael B. Baughan
|
|
|
49%
|
|
|
|
$267,500
|
|
|
Ÿ
Thomas P. McCaffrey
|
|
|
49%
|
|
|
|
$245,250
|
|
|
Ÿ
Wayne Exton
|
|
|
40%
|
|
|
|
$135,000
|
|
|
Ÿ
Werner Lieberherr
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
|
$167,500
|
|
|
Ÿ
Ryan Patch
|
|
|
46%
|
|
|
|
$186,000
|
|
2010 Modifications to the MIP
. Commencing in 2010, the aggregate amount of cash incentives payable to MIP participants will generally be determined by multiplying earnings before income taxes (as defined) by an agreed upon percentage, thereby providing an incentive pool which will increase or decrease with pretax earnings.
Long-Term Equity Incentives
.
We believe the use of long-term equity incentive awards accomplishes important objectives of our executive compensation program by linking executive compensation to long-term shareholder value creation. The level of benefit received by our executive officers is dependent, to a large degree, on the successful execution of our strategy and delivering significant, sustained growth.
On October 28, 2009, the Compensation Committee approved grants of restricted stock effective as of December 15, 2009 for our named executive officers and as of November 15, 2009 for all other eligible participants. This process is consistent with our policy of having the dollar value of annual grants of restricted stock to our employees reviewed and approved by our Compensation Committee at a meeting in the third or fourth quarter and having the grants made effective as of December 15 of each year for named executive officers (November 15 for all other eligible participants). The number of shares of restricted stock granted is equal to the dollar value approved by our Compensation Committee divided by the closing price of our common stock as quoted on the NASDAQ National Market on the date of grant. All grants of restricted stock are made pursuant to our 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Grants were made to approximately 260 of our managers, including each of our named executive officers.
In determining the amounts of the equity compensation awarded to our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee considered a variety of factors, including individual performance, competencies, skills, prior experiences, scope of responsibility and accountability within the organization.
The amount of
the awards ranged from approximately 120% -270% of each named executive officer’s base salary as follows:
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Percentage of
Base Salary
|
|
Dollar Value
of Award
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
Ÿ
Amin J. Khoury
|
|
271%
|
|
$2,908,022
|
|
129,951
|
Ÿ
Michael B. Baughan
|
|
191%
|
|
$1,041,777
|
|
46,425
|
Ÿ
Thomas P. McCaffrey
|
|
191%
|
|
$953,790
|
|
42,504
|
Ÿ
Wayne Exton
|
|
132%
|
|
$450,012
|
|
20,054
|
Ÿ
Werner Lieberherr
|
|
131%
|
|
$554,111
|
|
24,693
|
Ÿ
Ryan M. Patch
|
|
121%
|
|
$450,012
|
|
20,054
|
75% of the annual award to each named executive officer is subject to time-based vesting and 25% of the annual award is subject to performance-based vesting. The time-based portion of the award vests ratably over a period of three years commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Vesting of the performance-based portion of the award is subject to the Company achieving an average annual return on equity target established by the Compensation Committee for the three calendar years following the date of the grant as follows:
|
·
|
25% of the initial award will vest on the fourth anniversary of the award if 90% or more of the performance target is attained;
|
|
·
|
12.5% percent of the initial award will vest on the fourth anniversary of the award if between 85% and 90% of the performance is attained; and
|
|
·
|
No portion of the initial award will vest if less than 80% of the applicable target is attained.
|
|
·
|
For attainment between 80% and 85%, or between 85% and 90% of the applicable performance target, a portion of the award will vest as determined on the basis of linear interpolation.
|
Severance and Change of Control Benefits
.
We have entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers, which are described below in detail under the heading “Employment, Severance and Change of Control Agreements.” These agreements with our executive officers contain provisions that provide for benefits in the event that the executive is terminated in connection with a change of control of our Company. These change of control provisions generally provide for continuation of the executives’ base salary for the remaining term of their respective employment agreements and a severance payment ranging from one to three times the executive’s base salary.
Pursuant to the employment agreements, we also provide each of our named executive officers with severance benefits if their employment is terminated for any reason other than cause or, in some instances, due to their resignation for good reason (as each term is defined in the applicable agreements). In such cases, the employment agreements require that we pay the executive
(i) his salary for the remaining term of the applicable employment agreement and / or (ii) provide a severance payment ranging from one to two times the executive’s base salary. Our severance and change of control benefits were determined on the basis of market practices in order
to provide a competitive overall compensation package to our named executive officers
.
Retirement Benefits.
Other
than participation in our 401(k) Plan under the same terms as all other employees and as set forth below, we do not offer retirement benefits to our named executive officers. We provide some of
our named executive officers with the following retirement benefits:
In lieu of retirement benefits, we provide Mr. Khoury with an annual payment equal to 150% of his base salary. These payments are made on a quarterly basis in arrears. In addition, we have agreed with Mr. Khoury to make an annual payment in lieu of retirement benefits equal to the product determined by multiplying the annual increase in salary by 150% times the number of years since he founded the Company.
In lieu of retirement benefits, we provide Mr. Baughan with an annual payment equal to 50% of his average annual base salary for the preceding three-year period to a rabbi trust established on his behalf. All such payments will vest in full on April 26, 2012. Vesting of these payments will accelerate upon the termination of Mr. Baughan’s employment, due to his death, disability or by us without cause (as defined in his employment agreement). We make these payments, less applicable personal income taxes, into this rabbi trust on a quarterly basis in arrears.
In lieu of retirement benefits, we provide Mr. McCaffrey with an annual payment equal to 50% of his average annual salary for the preceding three-year period multiplied by the number of years service with the Company. These payments are made on a quarterly basis in arrears.
Other Compensation.
Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in all benefit programs that are generally available to all our employees. In addition, we provide our named executive officers with the following:
|
·
|
Under the Medical Care Reimbursement Plan for Executives, we generally reimburse each of our named executive officers for medical care expenses that are not otherwise reimbursed by any plan or arrangement up to a maximum benefit of 10% of their base salary per year.
|
|
·
|
We reimburse each of our named executive officers for reasonable costs of financial and estate planning.
|
|
·
|
We provide certain named executive officers with a monthly automobile allowance, as described below under the heading “Employment, Severance and Change of Control Agreements.”
|
|
·
|
Under our travel policy, we provide use of a Company-owned aircraft to our CEO and limited use to our former CEO to ensure their personal security. As set forth in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Director Compensation Table above and the Summary Compensation Table below, our CEO and former CEO are taxed on the incremental cost relating to their personal use of the aircraft.
|
To the extent applicable, these amounts are included in the Summary Compensation Table as part of the “All Other Compensation” column.
Benchmarking Objectives.
We believe our executives should possess above-average competencies, skills and prior experience and display above-average leadership skills as they discharge their responsibilities. We benchmark targeted pay levels for essentially every position throughout our organization. Our objective is to establish total targeted compensation (defined as base salary, targeted annual cash incentive, long-term incentives, and, where applicable, payments in lieu of retirement benefits) for our named executive officers near the 75th percentile of our peer group. We believe the weighting of each component of our compensation program (as described above under the heading “The Elements of our Compensation Program”) is appropriate given the historically cyclical nature of our industry, which has resulted and may result in several-year periods during which substantially lower cash incentives are awarded.
Benchmarking Process
.
Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee is empowered to hire outside advisors as it deems appropriate to assist it in the performance of its duties. The Compensation Committee has sole authority to retain or terminate any such compensation consultants or advisors, and to approve their fees. In 2009 the Compensation Committee retained Mercer Human Resources Consulting, an independent compensation consultant
,
to assist in the design and implementation of our executive compensation program including the review of market surveys and peer group comparisons. Compensation and other financial data for our peer group are compiled from publicly available information as well as from the Mercer’s proprietary database for similar sized industrial companies. Because the information is based on publicly available data, the comparisons are always against the data for the immediately preceding year (i.e., the 2009 study was based on data included in the 2008 annual reports and 2008 proxy statements of our peer group).
We believe market data provides a reference and framework for decisions about the base salary, targeted annual cash incentives and the appropriate level of long-term incentives to be provided to each named executive officer. However, due to variability and the inexact science of matching and pricing executive jobs, we believe that market data should be interpreted within the context of other important factors and should not solely be used to dictate a specific pay level for an executive. As a result, in setting the target pay level of our named executive officers, market data is reviewed along with a variety of other factors, including individual performance, competencies, skills, future potential, prior experience, scope of responsibility and accountability within the organization.
In 2009, Mercer reviewed both the individual components and aggregate composition of our compensation packages for our named executive officers focusing on several components of pay including:
|
·
|
actual and targeted base salary;
|
|
·
|
total cash compensation (i.e., base salary plus cash incentives);
|
|
·
|
actual and targeted long-term incentives;
|
|
·
|
total direct compensation (i.e., total cash plus long-term incentives); and
|
|
·
|
total direct compensation plus payments in lieu of retirement benefits, to the extent applicable.
|
Based on this review, Mercer advised the Compensation Committee that for each of our named executive officers:
|
·
|
the targeted total cash compensation (including base salary and targeted annual cash incentives) approximated the 75th percentile;
|
|
·
|
the targeted total direct compensation (including base salary, annual cash and long-term incentives) was positioned between the median and the 75
th
percentile of our peer group;
|
|
·
|
the total actual direct compensation (including base salary, annual cash and long-term incentives) plus payments in lieu of retirement benefits, as applicable, approximated the 75
th
percentile of the peer group; and
|
|
·
|
the total actual cash compensation was between the median and the 75
th
percentile of the peer group.
|
Mercer also studied our 2008 financial performance (the most current data then available) and that of our peer group, measuring revenue growth, operating income growth, EBITDA growth, EPS growth, and return on average equity and determined that we were positioned at approximately the 7
0
th
percentile of our peer group.
Compensation Comparison Group
.
The compensation comparison group we used in 2009 was comprised of the following 13 companies in the aerospace and defense industries:
|
·
|
Precision Castparts Corporation
|
|
·
|
Spirit Aerosystems Holdings
|
|
·
|
Teledyne Technologies, Inc.
|
|
·
|
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
|
|
·
|
Esterline Technologies Corporation
|
In consultation with Mercer, the Compensation Committee selected these companies for our peer group on the basis that (i) as compared to our Company, they were within a reasonable range for revenue size and equity market capitalization; (ii) they had executive positions comparable to those at our Company which required a similar set of management skills and experience;
and (iii) they were representative of organizations that compete with us for business and executive talent. The median 2008 revenues and equity market capitalization of our peer group were $1.9 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively; our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $1.9 billion and, as of December 31, 2009, our equity market capitalization was $2.4 billion.
Our Board of Directors established stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers and non-management directors. Under these guidelines, our named executive officers and members of the Board of Directors are required to own shares of the Corporation’s common stock with a market value of at least a specified multiple of their salary or cash retainer, as applicable, within a predetermined time period. The guidelines are five times salary for the CEO, three and one-half times salary for all other executive officers and three times the annual cash retainers for members of our Board of Directors. Progress toward meeting the guidelines is reviewed by the Compensation Committee annually. At December 31, 2009 all members of our Board Directors and all named executive officers were in compliance with our guidelines.
The Compensation Committee considers all shares held by a director or executive officer as follows toward meeting the ownership requirements: shares owned outright (including in family trusts and those held by a spouse), time vested restricted shares, shares or share equivalents held in our 401(k)Plan or Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Plan and shares in our employee stock purchase plan. Unexercised stock options and unearned performance shares are not included toward meeting the guidelines.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
To the extent that it is practicable and consistent with our executive compensation philosophy, we intend to comply with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which limits the deductibility of certain compensation payments to our executive officers in excess of $1 million. If compliance with Section 162(m) conflicts with the compensation philosophy or is determined not to be in the best interest of stockholders, the Compensation Committee will abide by its compensation philosophy.
To the extent that any compensation paid to our named executive officers constitutes a deferral of compensation within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, the Compensation Committee intends to cause the award to comply with the requirements of Section 409A and to avoid the imposition of penalty taxes and interest upon the participant receiving the award.
The Compensation Committee also takes accounting considerations, including the impact of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 718
Compensation – Stock Compensation
(FASB Statement 123(R), Share Based Payments) into account in structuring compensation programs and determining the form and amount of compensation awarded.
Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2009 with management. Based on the review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
|
Respectfully submitted,
|
|
|
|
The Compensation Committee
|
|
|
|
Charles L. Chadwell
|
|
Jonathan M. Schofield
|
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information concerning the total compensation paid to each of our named executive officers in 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
Amin J. Khoury
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,055,428
|
|
|
$
|
2,908,022
|
|
|
$
|
525,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,073,036
|
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
7,561,486
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,019,580
|
|
|
|
2,915,007
|
|
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
|
3,134,125
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
8,118,712
|
|
Officer
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1,001,200
|
|
|
|
1,752,756
|
|
|
|
1,001,200
|
|
|
|
4,656,784
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
8,411,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael B. Baughan
|
|
2009
|
|
|
539,442
|
|
|
|
1,041,777
|
|
|
|
267,500
|
|
|
|
310,240
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
2,158,959
|
|
President and Chief Operating
|
|
2008
|
|
|
523,462
|
|
|
|
990,003
|
|
|
|
535,000
|
|
|
|
278,532
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
2,326,997
|
|
Officer
|
|
2007
|
|
|
514,000
|
|
|
|
515,237
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
112,087
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
1,541,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas P. McCaffrey
|
|
2009
|
|
|
495,018
|
|
|
|
953,790
|
|
|
|
245,250
|
|
|
|
443,217
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
2,137,275
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief
|
|
2008
|
|
|
480,270
|
|
|
|
907,008
|
|
|
|
490,500
|
|
|
|
460,761
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
2,338,539
|
|
Financial Officer
|
|
2007
|
|
|
471,500
|
|
|
|
472,482
|
|
|
|
430,000
|
|
|
|
420,957
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
1,794,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne Exton
|
|
2009
|
|
|
338,103
|
|
|
|
450,012
|
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
38,448
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
961,563
|
|
Vice President and General
|
|
2008
|
|
|
298,928
|
|
|
|
420,008
|
|
|
|
270,000
|
|
|
|
25,889
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
1,014,825
|
|
Manager—Business Jet Segment
|
|
2007
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
274,990
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
31,599
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
756,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Werner Lieberherr
|
|
2009
|
|
|
419,840
|
|
|
|
554,111
|
|
|
|
167,500
|
|
|
|
26,890
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
1,168,341
|
|
Vice President and General
|
|
2008
|
|
|
407,390
|
|
|
|
520,008
|
|
|
|
335,000
|
|
|
|
27,122
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
1,289,520
|
|
Manager – Commercial Aircraft
|
|
2007
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
700,006
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
22,714
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
1,372,720
|
|
Products Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Patch
|
|
2009
|
|
|
368,369
|
|
|
|
450,012
|
|
|
|
186,000
|
|
|
|
411,050
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
1,415,431
|
|
Vice President – Law, General
|
|
2008
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Counsel and Secretary
|
|
2007
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1)
|
All annual cash bonuses paid to our named executive officers are reflected in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of this table.
|
|
(2)
|
The amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column represent the aggregate full grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (without any reduction for risk of forfeiture) as determined based on applying the assumptions used in our financial statements. Whether, and to what extent, a Named Executive Officer realizes value with respect to restricted stock awards will depend on our actual operating performance, stock price fluctuations and the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment.
|
|
(3)
|
The amounts shown represent the annual cash incentive payments received by our named executive officers under our MIP. These cash awards were earned in 2009, 2008 and 2007 and were paid on February 12, 2010, March 13,
2009 and March 7, 2008, respectively. The MIP is described in detail above in our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
|
|
(4)
|
With respect to Mr. Khoury, the amount reported for 2009, 2008 and 2007 as “All Other Compensation” includes payments made in lieu of retirement benefits of $2,600,396, $2,765,450 and $4,296,300, respectively, for our annual payments in lieu of retirement benefits; $219,504, $215,303 and $180,785, respectively, representing the aggregate incremental cost to us for his personal use of the Company aircraft; $192,367, $99,595 and $125,983, respectively, for estate planning; $9,800, $9,200 and $9,000, respectively for Company contributions to our 401(k) Plan; $13,594, $3,364 and $3,116, respectively, representing payments under our executive medical plan; and $37,375, $41,213 and $41,590, respectively, relating to an automobile and insurance provided by the Company. The aggregate incremental cost for the use of the Company aircraft for personal travel is calculated by multiplying the hourly variable cost rate for the aircraft by the hours used. The hourly variable cost rate includes costs such as fuel, oil, parking/landing fees, crew expenses and catering.
|
|
(5)
|
With respect to Mr. Baughan, the amount reported for 2009, 2008 and 2007 as “All Other Compensation” includes $286,539, $249,075 and $83,576, respectively, for our annual payments in lieu of retirement benefits; $9,800, $9,200 and $9,000, respectively, for contributions to the Company’s 401(k) Plan; $701, $3,626 and $2,880, respectively, representing payments under executive medical coverage; and an additional amount relating to an automobile allowance and estate planning.
|
|
(6)
|
With respect to Mr. McCaffrey, the amount reported for 2009, 2008 and 2007 as “All Other Compensation” includes $407,561, $381,243 and $341,967, respectively, for our annual payments in lieu of retirement benefits; $9,800, $9,200 and $9,000, respectively, for contributions to the Company’s 401(k) Plan; $9,587, $47,150 and $53,251, respectively, representing payments under our executive medical plan; and an additional amount relating to an automobile allowance and estate planning.
|
|
(7)
|
With respect to Mr. Exton, the amount reported for 2009, 2008 and 2007 as “All Other Compensation” includes $0, $0 and $9,399, respectively, for reimbursement of relocation expenses; $9,800, $9,200 and $9,000 respectively, for contributions to the Company’s 401(k) Plan; $15,448, $3,489 and $0, respectively, representing payments under our executive medical plan; and an additional amount relating to an automobile allowance.
|
|
(8)
|
With respect to Mr. Lieberherr, the amount reported for 2009, 2008 and 2007 as “All Other Compensation” includes $9,800, $9,200 and $9,000, respectively, for contributions to the Company’s 401(k) Plan; $3,890, $4,722 and $514, respectively, representing payments under our executive medical plan and for payment of COBRA benefits owed to his prior employer; and an additional amount relating to an automobile allowance.
|
|
(9)
|
With respect to Mr. Patch, the amount reported for 2009 as “All Other Compensation” includes $364,715 for reimbursement for relocation expenses; $9,800 for contributions to the Company’s 401(k) Plan; $23,335 representing payments under our executive medical plan and for payment of COBRA benefits owed to his prior employer; and an additional amount relating to an automobile allowance. Mr. Patch commenced employment on December 22
,
2008.
|
Grants of Plan-Based Awards During 2009
The following table sets forth information concerning incentive awards made to our named executive officers in 2009. Awards consisted of restricted stock and cash incentive awards under our MIP as described in detail in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity
|
|
|
Stock Awards:
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan (MIP or bonus) Awards (1)
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value of Stock
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Shares of Stock or
|
|
|
and Options
|
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Units (#)(3)(5)
|
|
|
Awards ($)(4)
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
(l)
|
|
Amin J. Khoury
|
|
1/1/2009
|
|
|
$ —
|
|
|
|
$536,123
|
|
|
|
$536,123
|
|
|
|
$ —
|
|
|
|
$ —
|
|
|
|
12/15/2009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
129,591
|
|
|
|
2,908,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael B. Baughan
|
|
1/1/2009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
272,600
|
|
|
|
272,600
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12/15/2009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
46,425
|
|
|
|
1,041,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas P. McCaffrey
|
|
1/1/2009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
250,150
|
|
|
|
250,150
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12/15/2009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
42,504
|
|
|
|
953,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Werner Lieberherr
|
|
1/1/2009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
212,160
|
|
|
|
212,160
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12/15/2009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
24,693
|
|
|
|
554,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne Exton
|
|
1/1/2009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
170,856
|
|
|
|
170,856
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12/15/2009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
20,054
|
|
|
|
450,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Patch
|
|
1/1/2009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
186,150
|
|
|
|
186,150
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12/15/2009
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
20,054
|
|
|
|
450,012
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts shown represent the range of annual cash incentive opportunities for each named executive officer under our 2009 MIP. The MIP is described in detail above in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
|
(2)
|
Since the amount of Non-Equity Incentive Plan awards are determined on the basis of a named executive officer’s contributions to the success of a segment or the Company, as applicable, no specific threshold can be determined.
|
(3)
|
The restricted stock awards made on December 15, 2009 were approved by our Compensation Committee at its meeting on October 29, 2009. This process is consistent with our policy of having the dollar value of annual grants of restricted stock to our employees reviewed and approved by our Compensation Committee at a meeting in the third or fourth quarter and having the grants made effective as of December 15 of each year (or if December 15 is not a business day, the first business day thereafter). The number of shares of restricted stock granted is equal to the dollar value approved by our Compensation Committee divided by the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. All grants of restricted stock are made pursuant to our 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
(4)
|
The amounts reported represent the aggregate full grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (without any reduction for risk of forfeiture) as determined based on applying the assumptions used in our financial statements. Whether, and to what extent, a Named Executive Officer realizes value with respect to restricted stock awards will depend on our actual operating performance, stock price fluctuations and the Named Executive Officer’s continued employment.
|
(5)
|
75% of the 2009 annual award is subject to time-based vesting and 25% of the 2009 annual award is subject to performance-based vesting. The time-based portion of the award vests ratably over a period of three years. The vesting of the performance-based portion of the award is subject to the Company achieving an average annual return on equity target established by the Compensation Committee for the three calendar years following the date of the grant. 25% of the initial award will vest on the fourth anniversary of the award if 90% or more of the performance target is attained; 12.5% of the initial award will vest on the fourth anniversary of the award if between 85% and
90% of the performance is attained, and no portion of the initial award will vest if less than 80% of the applicable target is attained. For attainment between 80% and 85%, or between 85% and 90% of the applicable performance target, between 25% and 50%, and 50% and 100%, respectively, of the performance-based portion of the award will vest (as determined on the basis of linear interpolation).
|
2009 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information concerning outstanding equity awards held by each named executive officer as of December 31, 2009, which include unvested shares of restricted stock.
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Market Value of
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or Units
|
|
|
Shares or Units
|
|
|
|
|
of Stock That
|
|
|
of Stock That
|
|
|
|
|
Have Not Vested
|
|
|
Have Not Vested
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
(#) (1) (2)
|
|
|
($)(3)
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
Amin J. Khoury
|
|
12/15/2009
|
|
|
129,591
|
|
|
$
|
3,045,389
|
|
|
11/17/2008
|
|
|
268,581
|
|
|
|
6,311,654
|
|
|
11/15/2007
|
|
|
20,456
|
|
|
|
480,716
|
|
|
11/15/2006
|
|
|
16,747
|
|
|
|
393,555
|
|
|
7/31/2006
|
|
|
96,969
|
|
|
|
2,278,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael B. Baughan
|
|
12/15/2009
|
|
|
46,425
|
|
|
|
1,090,988
|
|
|
11/17/2008
|
|
|
91,216
|
|
|
|
2,143,576
|
|
|
11/15/2007
|
|
|
6,013
|
|
|
|
141,306
|
|
|
11/15/2006
|
|
|
8,151
|
|
|
|
191,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas P. McCaffrey
|
|
12/15/2009
|
|
|
42,504
|
|
|
|
998,844
|
|
|
11/17/2008
|
|
|
83,569
|
|
|
|
1,963,872
|
|
|
11/15/2007
|
|
|
5,514
|
|
|
|
129,579
|
|
|
11/15/2006
|
|
|
7,966
|
|
|
|
187,201
|
|
|
7/31/2006
|
|
|
26,060
|
|
|
|
612,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne Exton
|
|
12/15/2009
|
|
|
20,054
|
|
|
|
471,269
|
|
|
11/17/2008
|
|
|
38,698
|
|
|
|
909,403
|
|
|
11/15/2007
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
75,412
|
|
|
11/15/2006
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
|
|
108,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Werner Lieberherr
|
|
12/15/2009
|
|
|
24,693
|
|
|
|
580,286
|
|
|
11/17/2008
|
|
|
47,912
|
|
|
|
1,125,932
|
|
|
11/15/2007
|
|
|
8,170
|
|
|
|
191,995
|
|
|
11/15/2006
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
47,870
|
|
|
7/5/2006
|
|
|
4,585
|
|
|
|
107,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Patch
|
|
12/15/2009
|
|
|
20,054
|
|
|
|
471,269
|
|
|
11/23/2008
|
|
|
65,178
|
|
|
|
1,531,683
|
|
(1)
|
Commencing in 2008, 75% of the annual award to each named executive officer is subject to time-based vesting and 25% of the annual award is subject to performance-based vesting. The time-based portion of the award vests ratably over a period of three years. The vesting of the performance-based portion of the award is subject to the Company achieving an average annual return on equity target established by the Compensation Committee for the three calendar years following the date of the grant. 25% of the initial award will vest on the fourth anniversary of the award if 90% or more of the performance target is attained; 12.5% of the initial award will vest on the fourth anniversary of the award if between 85% and 90% of the performance target attained, and no portion of the initial award will vest if less than 80% of the applicable target is attained. For attainment between 80% and 85%, or between 85% and 90% of the applicable target, between 25% and 50% and 50% and 100%, respectively, of the performance-based portion of the award will vest (as determined on the basis of linear interpolation).
|
|
(2)
|
With respect to awards granted prior to 2008, 25% of the shares will vest on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant provided that the executive is employed on the applicable vesting date.
|
|
(3)
|
The market value of unvested shares is based on the closing share price of $23.50, which was the closing price of our common stock as quoted on the NASDAQ National Market on December 31, 2009.
|
Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
During 2009
The following table provides information concerning vesting of stock awards held by each named executive officer during 2009. No options were outstanding in 2009.
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
Name
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
on Exercise
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)(#)
|
|
|
(c)($)
|
|
|
(d)(#)(1)
|
|
|
(e)($)(2)
|
|
Amin J. Khoury
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
213,473
|
|
|
$
|
4,287,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael B. Baughan
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
41,564
|
|
|
|
944,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas P. McCaffrey
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
64,640
|
|
|
|
1,317,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne Exton
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
19,136
|
|
|
|
434,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Werner Lieberherr
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,679
|
|
|
|
558,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Patch
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
21,727
|
|
|
|
521,013
|
|
|
Represents the shares of restricted stock that vested during 2009.
|
|
Represents the number of shares of restricted stock that vested during 2009 multiplied by the closing price of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ National market on the applicable vesting date.
|
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
All of our employees, including our named executive officers, participate in our qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan. Pursuant to this plan, we match 100% of the first 3% and 50% of the next 2% of employee contributions up to $9,800. We do not provide any nonqualified deferred compensation benefits to any of our employees.
Employment, Severance and Change of Control Agreements
We have entered into employment agreements with each of our named executive officers as described below.
Amin J. Khoury.
Mr. Khoury is party to an employment agreement with us, amended and restated as of December 31, 2008, pursuant to which he serves as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, or CEO. The agreement has a rolling three-year term so that the term of the agreement extends through three years from any date as of which the term is being determined unless terminated earlier. The agreement provides that Mr. Khoury will receive a base salary of $1,072,200 per year (as of July 1, 2009), subject to an annual cost-of-living increase and other increases as determined from time to time by our Board of Directors. Mr. Khoury is also entitled to participate in our MIP and to receive an annual cash incentive as determined by the Compensation Committee. Our CEO is also eligible to participate in all benefit plans (other than retirement plans) generally available to our executives and we provide him with an automobile and automobile insurance at a cost of approximately $40,000 per year.
General Provisions
In lieu of retirement benefits, we provide Mr. Khoury with annual payments equal to 150% of his base salary. These payments are made on a quarterly basis in arrears. In addition, we make an annual payment in lieu of retirement benefits equal to the product determined by multiplying the annual increase in salary by 150% times the number of years since he founded the Company. This payment is made in the quarter following the change in salary. All such payments are made to a grantor trust for
the benefit of Mr. Khoury, such payments are taxable to Mr. Khoury when paid, and historically have been distributed to Mr. Khoury at the time of payment as provided pursuant to the terms of the trust agreement. These payments are reported in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table above.
Mr. Khoury’s employment agreement provides that he and his spouse will receive medical, dental and health benefits (including benefits under our executive medical reimbursement plan) for the remainder of their lives notwithstanding a termination of his employment for any reason.
Pursuant to the agreement, if Mr. Khoury’s employment with us terminates for any reason other than death or incapacity, we will enter into a consulting arrangement with him under which he has agreed to provide strategic planning, financial planning, merger and acquisition advice and consultation to us, as well as periodic advice and consultation regarding key staffing and recruitment issues and such other services as we may mutually agree upon. The consulting agreement will extend for a period of five years following Mr. Khoury’s termination of employment. During the duration of his consulting agreement, Mr. Khoury will be entitled to an annual consulting fee equal to 15% of his salary in effect on the day of his termination of employment and will also be entitled to an office, an assistant, travel benefits under our travel policy described above in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, automobile benefits and reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket business expenses. Unvested restricted stock awards will continue to vest in accordance with the award agreement for so long as Mr. Khoury is providing consulting services under this agreement. During the five-year term, the consulting agreement may not be amended or terminated without the prior written consent of us and Mr. Khoury. In the event of Mr. Khoury’s death or disability during the consulting period, he or his designee will receive a lump-sum payment equal to the fees for the then remaining term of the consulting period.
In the event that any payments or other benefits made to Mr. Khoury are subject to excise taxes as an “excess parachute payment” under the Internal Revenue Code, he will receive an excise tax gross-up payment. Similarly, the agreement provides him with a tax gross-up payment with respect to tax obligations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Incidental costs and expenses incurred in respect of certain accounting tasks and procedures associated with these tax matters will also be paid by us.
During the term of his employment agreement and consulting agreement (if applicable) and for a period of two years thereafter, Mr. Khoury may not compete with us or solicit our employees. In addition, Mr. Khoury is subject to a confidentiality provision that lasts indefinitely.
Specific Termination and Change of Control Provisions
In addition to the benefits described above, Mr. Khoury will be entitled to receive the following benefits and payments upon the occurrence of the following specified events:
Voluntary Termination.
If Mr. Khoury terminates his employment with us at any time and for any reason other than due to death, incapacity or in connection with the closing of a Change of Control transaction, he is entitled to a lump-sum severance payment amount equal to one times his annual base salary.
Involuntary Termination.
If Mr. Khoury’s employment with us is terminated by us for any reason other than death, incapacity or in connection with the closing of a Change of Control transaction, he is entitled to (i) a lump-sum payment equal to the salary he would have received had he remained employed through the remainder of the then-existing term, (ii) a final payment in lieu of retirement benefits determined as if he remained employed for three years following the termination of his employment and (iii) accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards with stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their applicable terms, and a lump-sum severance amount equal to one times his annual base salary.
Change of Control.
If a change of control occurs, Mr. Khoury will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all equity awards with any stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their applicable terms. In addition, if his employment terminates contemporaneously with a Change of Control transaction for any reason other than his resignation for good reason, our CEO will be entitled to a lump-sum severance amount equal to one times his annual base salary. If Mr. Khoury’s employment is not terminated contemporaneously with a Change of Control transaction, his employment agreement will remain in effect and upon a subsequent termination of employment he will be entitled to the payments and benefits set forth in his employment agreement as described above. However, if Mr. Khoury’s employment is terminated by him for good reason following a change of control, he will receive (i) a lump sum amount equal to the sum of the annual base salary he would have received had he remained employed through the third anniversary of the termination date, (ii) a final payment in lieu of retirement benefits calculated as if he had remained employed through the third anniversary of the termination date, and (iii) a severance payment of one times his base salary in effect for that year. In the event of a dispute regarding the benefits payable to Mr. Khoury upon a change of control, we will pay or reimburse him for all related legal expenses. In the event the Company determines it likely that a change of control will occur, it will establish a grantor trust to secure any potential obligations to the CEO associated with the change of control.
Death.
In the event of Mr. Khoury’s death, his designee will receive an amount equal to the salary that would have been due to him if he remained employed through the third anniversary of his death. In addition, Mr. Khoury’s designee will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all equity awards with any stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their applicable terms. On April 27, 2007, we entered into a death benefit agreement with Mr. Khoury that provides for the payment of a $3.0 million death benefit to his named beneficiary upon his death during or after his employment. We have funded this death benefit with a single payment whole life insurance policy which will fund 100% of this obligation upon his death.
Incapacity.
In the event of Mr. Khoury’s termination of employment due to his incapacity, he will receive an amount equal to two times the annual base salary that he would have received had he remained employed through the third anniversary of his termination of employment, payable in a lump sum. In addition, Mr. Khoury will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all equity awards with any stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their applicable terms.
Michael B. Baughan.
Mr. Michael B. Baughan, our President and Chief Operating Officer, or COO, is party to an employment agreement with us that was amended and restated as of December 31, 2008. The agreement has a rolling three-year term so that the term extends through three years from any date as of which the term is being determined unless terminated earlier. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Baughan receives an annual salary of $545,200 per year (as of July 1, 2009), subject to annual cost-of-living increases from time to time by our Board of Directors, and he may receive an annual incentive bonus under our MIP at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, which is generally limited to 120% of his base salary, unless otherwise approved by the Board of Directors. Mr. Baughan is also eligible to participate
in all benefit plans (other than retirement plans) available to our executives and to receive an automobile allowance of $1,100 per month.
Our agreement with Mr. Baughan provides that we will make quarterly payments in lieu of retirement benefits to a rabbi trust established for his benefit in an annual amount equal to 50% of his average annual salary for the preceding three-year period. These payments will vest in full in April 2012 provided that Mr. Baughan remains employed through this date. Vesting of these payments will accelerate upon the termination of Mr. Baughan’s employment due to his death or incapacity, by us without cause or upon a change of control. Upon vesting, funds will be distributed to Mr. Baughan and all future payments will be made to Mr. Baughan directly.
In the event that any payments or other benefits made to
Mr. Baughan
are subject to excise
taxes
as an “excess parachute payment” under the Internal Revenue Code,
he
will receive an excise tax gross-up payment. Similarly, the agreement provides
Mr. Baughan
with a tax gross-up payment with respect to tax obligations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Incidental costs and expenses incurred in respect of certain accounting tasks and procedures associated with these tax matters will be paid by us.
Mr. Baughan is also party to the Company’s standard proprietary information and confidentiality agreement.
Specific Termination and Change of Control Provisions
In addition to the benefits described above, Mr. Baughan will be entitled to receive the following benefits and payments upon the occurrence of the following specified events:
Involuntary Termination.
In the event Mr. Baughan’s employment is terminated by us without cause (as defined in the employment agreement), he will receive a lump-sum severance amount equal to the salary he would have received had he remained employed through the third anniversary of his termination. He will also be entitled to the immediate vesting of the benefits held in a rabbi trust as described above. In addition, all outstanding equity awards will immediately vest with any stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their applicable terms. Mr. Baughan and his eligible dependents will also be eligible to receive medical, dental and health benefits for two years following the termination.
Change of Control.
If a change of control occurs (as defined under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code), Mr. Baughan will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all equity awards with any stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their applicable term. In addition, if, in connection with the change of control his employment is terminated by us without cause, Mr. Baughan will be entitled to a lump-sum amount equal to three times his salary, accelerated vesting of the funds held the rabbi trust describe above, and two year’s continuation of his and his dependents’ medical, dental and health benefits. The Company will establish a grantor trust for any change of control payments if it determines that a change of control is likely to occur. In the event of a dispute regarding the benefits payable to our COO upon a change of control, we will pay or reimburse him for all related legal expenses.
Death.
In the event of Mr. Baughan’s termination due to his death, his designee will receive a lump-sum payment equal to the salary that would have been due to him had he remained employed through the third anniversary of his death. Mr. Baughan’s designee will also receive accelerated vesting of the funds held in a rabbi trust described above and accelerated vesting of all
outstanding equity awards with any stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their applicable terms. In addition, Mr. Baughan’s eligible dependents will receive two years continuation of his medical, dental and health benefits. On April 27, 2007, we entered into a death benefit agreement with Mr. Baughan that provides for the payment of a $1.5 million death benefit to his named beneficiary upon his death during or after his employment. We have funded this death benefit with a single payment whole life insurance policy which will fund 100% of this obligation upon his death.
Incapacity.
In the event of Mr. Baughan’s termination due to his incapacity, he will receive the salary and automobile allowance that he would have received had he remained employed through the third anniversary of his termination. In addition, Mr. Baughan and his eligible dependants will be entitled to receive, for two years following his termination due to his incapacity, continuation of medical, dental and health benefits. As a result of such a termination, Mr. Baughan will also be entitled to accelerated vesting of the funds held in a rabbi trust described above and accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards with any stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their applicable terms.
Voluntary Resignation; Termination for Cause.
If, at any time, Mr. Baughan resigns his employment with us or his employment is terminated by us for cause he will not be entitled to any further compensation or benefits other than as set forth in any applicable plans, programs and arrangements. He will also forfeit any unvested amounts in his retirement account.
Thomas P. McCaffrey
.
Mr. Thomas P. McCaffrey is party to an employment agreement with us, amended and restated as of December 31, 2008, pursuant to which he serves as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO. The agreement has a rolling three-year term so that the term extends through three years from any date as of which the term is being determined unless terminated earlier. The agreement provides that Mr. McCaffrey will receive a base salary of $500,300 per year (as of July 1, 2009), subject to cost of living and other increases as determined from time to time by our Board of Directors. Mr. McCaffrey is also entitled to participate in our MIP and to receive a discretionary annual cash incentive. Mr. McCaffrey is also eligible to participate in all benefit plans (other than retirement plans) available to our executives and to receive an automobile allowance of $1,100 per month.
General Provisions
Our agreement with Mr. McCaffrey provides that we will make quarterly payments in lieu of retirement benefits in an annual amount equal to one-half of his average annual salary for the preceding three-year period multiplied by the number of years service with the Company, less all prior payments. These payments are made to a grantor trust for the benefit of Mr. McCaffrey, such payments are taxable to Mr. McCaffrey when paid, and historically have been distributed to Mr. McCaffrey at the time of payment as provided pursuant to the terms of the trust agreement. These payments are reported in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table above. We make these payments on a quarterly basis in arrears.
In the event our CFO terminates employment for any reason other than a termination by us for cause, he will be entitled to any accrued but unpaid bonus for the prior year and any accrued but unpaid payments in lieu of retirement benefits.
In the event that any payments or other benefits made to him are subject to excise taxes as an “excess parachute payment” under the Internal Revenue Code, Mr. McCaffrey will receive an excise tax gross-up payment. Similarly, the agreement provides him with a tax gross-up payment with respect to tax obligations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Incidental costs and expenses incurred in respect of certain accounting tasks and procedures associated with these tax matters will be paid by us.
Mr. McCaffrey is also party to the Company’s standard proprietary information and confidentiality agreement.
Specific Termination and Change of Control Provisions
In addition to the benefits described above, Mr. McCaffrey will be entitled to receive the following benefits and payments upon the occurrence of the following specified events:
Involuntary Termination; Resignation with Good Reason.
In the event Mr. McCaffrey’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by him for good reason (as each term is defined in the employment agreement), other than contemporaneously with a change of control transaction, he will receive a lump-sum severance amount equal to two times his annual salary, plus the salary he would have received had he remained employed through the third anniversary of his termination. He will also receive a final payment in lieu of retirement benefits determined as if he continued employment for three years following the termination. As a result of such a termination, he will also be entitled to the immediate vesting of all equity awards with any stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their applicable terms.
Change of Control.
If a change of control occurs, Mr. McCaffrey will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all equity awards with any stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their applicable term. In addition, if, contemporaneously with a change of control transaction, Mr. McCaffrey’s employment is terminated for any reason,
Mr. McCaffrey will be entitled to a lump-sum amount equal to two times his annual base salary. If Mr. McCaffrey’s employment is not terminated contemporaneously with a change of control transaction, his employment agreement will remain in effect and upon a subsequent termination of employment he will be entitled to the payments and benefits set forth in the agreement. In the event of a dispute regarding the benefits payable to Mr. McCaffrey upon a change of control, we will pay or reimburse him for all related legal expenses.
Death.
In the event of Mr. McCaffrey’s termination due to his death, his designee will receive a lump-sum payment equal to the salary that would have been due to him had he remained employed through the third anniversary of his death. Mr. McCaffrey’s eligible dependents will also be entitled to receive, for two years following his death, continuation of medical, dental and health benefits. In addition, Mr. McCaffrey will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all equity awards with any stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their applicable terms. On April 27, 2007, we entered into a death benefit agreement with Mr. McCaffrey that provides for the payment of a $1.0 million death benefit to his named beneficiary upon his death during or after his employment. We have funded this death benefit with a single payment whole life insurance policy which will fund 100% of this obligation upon Mr. McCaffrey’s death.
Incapacity.
In the event of Mr. McCaffrey’s termination due to his incapacity, he will receive the salary and automobile allowance that he would have received had he remained employed through the third anniversary of his termination of employment, payable in a lump sum. In addition, Mr. McCaffrey will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all equity awards with any stock options remaining exercisable for the remainder of their applicable terms. Mr. McCaffrey and his eligible dependants will also be entitled to receive, for two years following his termination due to his incapacity, continuation of medical, dental and health benefits.
Retirement; Resignation Without Good Reason.
If Mr. McCaffrey retires or resigns without good reason at any time, he is entitled to a lump-sum severance payment equal to one times his annual base salary.
Termination for Cause.
If, at any time, Mr. McCaffrey is terminated by us for cause, he will not be entitled to any further compensation and benefits other than as set forth in any applicable plans, programs or arrangements.
Wayne Exton.
Mr. Exton is party to an employment agreement amended and restated as of March 17, 2009, that is automatically renewed for additional one-year terms unless either we or Mr. Exton gives the other party at least 30 days’ written notice prior to the then-applicable expiration date. Under the terms of his employment agreement Mr. Exton receives an annual salary of $341,700 per year (as of July 1, 2009), subject to adjustment from time to time. He is also eligible to receive a discretionary incentive bonus under our MIP. Mr. Exton is entitled to an automobile allowance of $1,100 per month and may participate in all benefits plans, programs and arrangements generally made available to our executive officers. Mr. Exton is also party to the Company’s standard proprietary information and confidentiality agreement.
Specific Termination and Change of Control Provisions
Death; Incapacity
.
Upon his death, Mr. Exton is entitled to a lump-sum amount equal to the salary that he would have received had he remained employed through the remainder of the then-applicable term. In the event of the termination of Mr. Exton’s employment due to his incapacity, Mr. Exton is entitled to a lump-sum amount equal to the salary that he would have received had he remained employed through the remainder of the then-applicable term of the agreement as well as the continuation of benefits through the agreement termination date, subject to mitigation from alternative employment. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the applicable equity award agreements, upon a termination of his employment due to death or disability, Mr. Exton will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all outstanding shares of restricted stock.
Termination without Cause.
In the event that we terminate Mr. Exton’s employment without cause, he will be entitled to continue to receive medical and dental benefits, for the remainder of the then-applicable employment term, subject to mitigation from alternative employment and a lump-sum payment equal to the sum of his base salary for one year and his base salary for the then-remaining term of the agreement.
Change of Control
.
Following a change of control, if Mr. Exton resigns for good reason or we terminate his employment without cause, he will be entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equal to one times his base salary and continuation of his base salary for the then-remaining term of the agreement. He will also be entitled to continue to receive medical and dental benefits during the remainder of his employment term, or, if earlier, until he becomes eligible to participate in the plans of a subsequent employer. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the applicable equity award agreements, Mr. Exton will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all outstanding shares of restricted stock.
Termination for Cause; Resignation without Good Reason.
If Mr. Exton is terminated by us for cause or resigns for any reason other than good reason upon change of control, he will not be entitled to any further compensation and benefits other than as set forth in any applicable plans, programs or arrangements.
Mr. Exton is also party to the Company’s standard proprietary information and confidentiality agreement.
Werner Lieberherr.
Mr. Lieberherr is party to an employment agreement amended and restated as of December 9, 2008, that is automatically renewed for additional one-year terms unless either we or Mr. Lieberherr gives the other party at least 90 days’ written notice prior to the then-applicable expiration date. Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Lieberherr receives an annual salary of $424,300 per year (as of July 1, 2009), subject to adjustment from time to time. He is also eligible to receive an annual discretionary incentive bonus under our MIP. Mr. Lieberherr is entitled to an automobile allowance of $1,100 per month and may participate in all benefits plans, programs and arrangements generally made available to our executive officers. Mr. Lieberherr is also party to the Company’s standard proprietary information and confidentiality agreement.
Specific Termination and Change of Control Provisions
Mr. Lieberherr will be entitled to receive the following benefits and payments upon the occurrence of the following specified events:
Death; Incapacity.
Upon his death, Mr. Lieberherr’s designee is entitled to an amount equal to the salary that he would have received had he remained employed through the remainder of the then-applicable term. In the event of the termination of Mr. Lieberherr’s employment due to his incapacity, he will receive a lump-sum payment representing his base salary and automotive allowance for the then-remaining term of the agreement, as well as the continuation of benefits through the agreement termination date, subject to mitigation from alternative employment. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the applicable equity award agreements, upon a termination of his employment due to death or disability, Mr. Lieberherr will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all outstanding shares of restricted stock or other equity awards.
Termination without Cause.
In the event that we terminate Mr. Lieberherr’s employment without cause, he will be entitled to continue to receive medical and dental benefits for the remainder of the then-applicable employment term, subject to mitigation from alternative employment and a lump-sum payment equal to the sum of his base salary for one year and his base salary for the then-remaining term of the agreement.
Change of Control.
In the event that following a change of control, Mr. Lieberherr resigns for good reason or we terminate his employment without cause, he will be entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equal to one times his base salary and continuation of his base salary, in addition to medical and dental benefits for the then-remaining term of the agreement, subject to mitigation from alternative employment. Upon a change of control, Mr. Lieberherr will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all outstanding shares of restricted stock or other equity awards.
Ryan M. Patch
.
Mr. Patch is party to an employment agreement dated October 17, 2008, pursuant to which he serves as the Vice President – Law, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company. The agreement has an initial term of three years and is automatically renewed for additional one-year terms unless either we or Mr. Patch give the other party at least 6 months’ written notice prior to the then-applicable expiration date. Under the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Patch receives an annual salary of $405,000 per year as of December 22, 2009, subject to adjustment from time to time. He is also eligible to receive an annual discretionary incentive bonus under our MIP. Mr. Patch is entitled to an automobile allowance of $1,100 per month and may participate in all benefits plans, programs and arrangements generally made available to our executive officers. Mr. Patch is also party to the Company’s standard proprietary information and confidentiality agreement.
Specific Termination and Change of Control Provisions
Death
.
Upon his death, Mr. Patch’s designee is entitled to a lump-sum payment equal to the salary and automobile allowance that he would have received had he remained employed through the remainder of the then-applicable term of the agreement. Mr. Patch’s eligible dependents will also be entitled to receive, for two years following his death, continuation of medical, dental and health benefits. In addition, upon a termination of his employment due to death, Mr. Patch will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all outstanding shares of restricted stock or other equity awards.
Incapacity.
In the event of the termination of Mr. Patch’s employment due to his incapacity, Mr. Patch is entitled to a lump-sum payment equal to the salary and automobile allowance that he would have received had he remained employed through the remainder of the then-applicable term of the agreement. Mr. Patch and his eligible dependents will also be entitled to receive, for two years following his termination due to his incapacity, continuation of medical, dental and health benefits. In addition, upon a termination of his employment due to incapacity, Mr. Patch will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all outstanding shares of restricted stock or other equity awards.
Termination without Cause.
In the event that we terminate Mr. Patch’s employment without cause (as defined in the agreement), he will be entitled to receive a lump-sum amount equal to the sum of (i) his base salary for one year, (ii) his target incentive bonus for the year in which his termination occurs, and (iii) his base salary for the then-remaining term of the
agreement. In addition, Mr. Patch will be entitled to the immediate vesting of all outstanding shares of restricted stock or other equity awards.
Change of Control.
If following, or in connection with, a change of control (as defined in the agreement), Mr. Patch resigns for good reason (as defined in the agreement) or we terminate his employment without cause, he will be entitled to receive a lump-sum payment equal to the sum of (i) his base salary for one year, (ii) his target incentive bonus for the year in which the termination occurs, and (iii) his base salary and automobile allowance for the then-remaining term of the agreement. In addition, Mr. Patch and his eligible dependents will be entitled to receive continuation of medical, dental and health benefits for the then-remaining term of the agreement. Upon a change of control, Mr. Patch will also be entitled to the immediate vesting of all outstanding shares of restricted stock or other equity awards.
In the event any payments or benefits paid to Mr. Patch would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code or any interest or penalties payable with respect to such excise tax, then Mr. Patch is entitled to a gross-up payment from the Company.
Potential Payments upon a Termination or Change of Control
The tables that follow summarize the potential compensation that would have been payable to each of our named executive officers as a result of a termination of the named executive officer’s employment or a change of control. The tables generally assume that the named executive officer’s employment terminated on December 31, 2009 and, if applicable, that the change of control occurred on December 31, 2009. In addition, for purposes of the calculations, we assume that the fair market value of our common stock was $23.50, which was the closing price of our common stock as quoted on the NASDAQ National Market on December 31, 2009.
The tables below do not include the value of any vested and non-forfeitable payments or other benefits that the named executive officers would have been entitled to receive on December 31, 2009, regardless of whether a termination event occurred on such date (e.g., benefits the executive would have received even if he voluntarily resigned on the assumed date of the change of control), including the following:
|
·
|
Defined Contribution Plans
.
Each of the named executive officer’s account balances under the 401(k) Plan, including any Company contributions, were fully vested as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
·
|
Vested Equity Awards
.
Once vested, restricted stock awards are not forfeitable. The number and fair market value of all shares of restricted stock that were vested as of December 31, 2009 are set forth above in the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table.
|
|
·
|
Life Insurance
.
Each of the named executive officers is entitled to receive Company paid group term life insurance of one times his or her base salary. This plan is applicable to all of our employees on a nondiscriminatory basis.
|
|
·
|
Executive Medical Benefits
.
Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Khoury and his spouse are entitled to receive medical benefits for the remainder of their lives regardless of the reason for termination of employment.
|
The amounts shown in the tables below represent summary estimates of the payments to be made upon each specified termination event as if the event occurred on December 31, 2009 and do not reflect any actual payments to be received by the named executive officers:
Amin J. Khoury
|
|
|
|
Change of Control
|
|
|
|
Contempraneous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
Contemporaneous
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
Termination/
|
|
|
Resignation With
|
|
|
Remain
|
|
Element
|
|
Resignation
|
|
|
Incapacity
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Resignation
|
|
|
Good Reason
|
|
|
Employed
|
|
Lump-sum of Salary for
Contract Term/Severance
Payment
|
|
$
|
1,072,245
|
|
|
$
|
6,433,470
|
|
|
$
|
3,216,735
|
|
|
$
|
4,288,980
|
|
|
$
|
1,072,245
|
|
|
$
|
4,288,980
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Accrued Cash Incentive Compensation
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments in lieu of
retirement benefit
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
4,825,103
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
4,825,103
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash Payments
|
|
|
1,072,245
|
|
|
|
6,958,470
|
|
|
|
3,741,735
|
|
|
|
9,639,083
|
|
|
|
1,597,245
|
|
|
|
9,639,083
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceleration of Unvested
Equity Awards
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
12,510,084
|
|
|
|
12,510,084
|
|
|
|
12,510,084
|
|
|
|
12,510,084
|
|
|
|
12,510,084
|
|
|
|
12,510,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Gross-up
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
1,072,245
|
|
|
$
|
19,468,554
|
|
|
$
|
16,251,819
|
|
|
$
|
22,149,167
|
|
|
$
|
14,107,329
|
|
|
$
|
22,149,167
|
|
|
$
|
12,510,084
|
|
Michael B. Baughan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change of Control
|
|
|
|
Resignation/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Resignation/
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
Remain
|
|
|
Without
|
|
Element
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
Incapacity
|
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Employed
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
Lump-sum of Salary for
Contract Term/Severance
Payment
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1,635,597
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,635,597
|
|
|
$
|
1,635,597
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1,635,597
|
|
Accrued Cash Incentive
Compensation
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
267,500
|
|
|
|
|
267,500
|
|
|
|
267,500
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
267,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments in Lieu of
Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
694,933
|
|
|
|
|
694,933
|
|
|
|
694,933
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
694,933
|
|
Benefit Continuation
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
62,060
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
22,460
|
|
|
|
22,460
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
22,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash Payments
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
2,660,090
|
|
|
|
|
2,620,490
|
|
|
|
2,620,490
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
2,620,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceleration of Unvested
Equity Awards
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,567,418
|
|
|
|
|
3,567,418
|
|
|
|
3,567,418
|
|
|
|
3,567,418
|
|
|
|
3,567,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Gross-up
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
6,227,508
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,187,908
|
|
|
$
|
6,187,908
|
|
|
$
|
3,567,418
|
|
|
$
|
6,187,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Benefit continuation for incapacity includes $39,600 for automobile allowance.
Thomas P. McCaffrey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change of Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resignation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contemporaneous
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
Resignation/
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
Remain
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
Element
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
Incapacity
|
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Employed
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
Lump-sum of Salary for
Contract Term/Severance
Payment
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
500,300
|
|
|
$
|
1,500,900
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,500,900
|
|
|
$
|
2,501,500
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1,000,600
|
|
Accrued Cash Incentive
Compensation
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
245,250
|
|
|
|
245,250
|
|
|
|
|
245,250
|
|
|
|
245,250
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
245,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Continuation
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
75,126
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
35,526
|
|
|
|
35,526
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments in Lieu of
Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
750,450
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash Payments
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
745,550
|
|
|
|
1,821,276
|
|
|
|
|
1,781,676
|
|
|
|
3,532,726
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1,245,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceleration of Unvested
Equity Awards
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,891,906
|
|
|
|
|
3,891,906
|
|
|
|
3,891,906
|
|
|
|
3,891,906
|
|
|
|
3,891,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Gross-up
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
745,550
|
|
|
$
|
5,713,182
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,673,582
|
|
|
$
|
7,424,632
|
|
|
$
|
3,891,906
|
|
|
$
|
5,137,756
|
|
(2) Benefit continuation for incapacity includes $39,600 for automobile allowance.
Wayne Exton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change of Control
|
|
|
|
Resignation/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Resignation/
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
Remain
|
|
|
Without
|
|
Element
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
Incapacity
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Employed
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
Lump-sum of Salary for
Contract Term/Severance
Payment
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
112,343
|
|
|
$
|
112,343
|
|
|
$
|
454,054
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
454,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Continuation
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
6,309
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
6,309
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
6,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash Payments
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
118,652
|
|
|
|
112,343
|
|
|
|
460,363
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
460,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceleration of Unvested
Equity Awards
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1,564,912
|
|
|
|
1,564,912
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1,564,912
|
|
|
|
1,564,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1,683,564
|
|
|
$
|
1,677,255
|
|
|
$
|
460,363
|
|
|
$
|
1,564,912
|
|
|
$
|
2,025,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Werner Lieberherr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change of Control
|
|
|
|
Resignation/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Resignation/
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
Remain
|
|
|
Without
|
|
Element
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
Incapacity
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
Employed
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
Lump-sum of Salary for
Contract Term/Severance
Payment
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
215,066
|
|
|
$
|
215,066
|
|
|
$
|
639,386
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
639,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Continuation
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
13,999
|
(3)
|
|
|
6,690
|
(3)
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash Payments
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
229,065
|
|
|
|
221,756
|
|
|
|
646,694
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
646,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceleration of Unvested
Equity Awards
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
2,053,830
|
|
|
|
2,053,830
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
2,053,830
|
|
|
|
2,053,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
2,282,895
|
|
|
$
|
2,275,586
|
|
|
$
|
646,694
|
|
|
$
|
2,053,830
|
|
|
$
|
2,700,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Benefit continuation for incapacity and death includes $6,690 for automobile allowance.
Ryan M. Patch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cause/
|
|
|
|
Resignation/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
Resignation/
|
|
|
|
Resignation
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
|
Remain
|
|
|
|
with
|
|
Compensation Element
|
|
for Cause
|
|
|
|
Incapacity
|
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
|
Employed
|
|
|
|
Good Reason
|
|
Lump-sum of Salary for
Contract Term/Severance
Payment
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
798,904
|
|
|
$
|
798,904
|
|
|
|
1,203,904
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1,203,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Cash Incentive
Compensation
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
186,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
186,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Continuation
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
83,624
|
(4)
|
|
|
83,624
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
82,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash Payments
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
882,528
|
|
|
|
882,528
|
|
|
|
1,389,904
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1,472,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acceleration of Unvested
Equity Awards
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
2,002,952
|
|
|
|
2,002,952
|
|
|
|
2,002,952
|
|
|
|
2,002,952
|
|
|
|
2,002,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Gross-up
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
2,885,480
|
|
|
$
|
2,885,480
|
|
|
$
|
3,392,856
|
|
|
$
|
2,002,952
|
|
|
$
|
3,475,691
|
|
(4) Benefit continuation includes $26,038 for automobile allowance.
Policy and Procedures for the Review and Approval of Related Person Transactions
We have adopted a written policy pursuant to which our Audit Committee will be presented with a description of any related person transactions for them to consider for approval. The policy is designed to operate in conjunction with and as a supplement to the provisions of our Code of Business Conduct.
Under the policy, our Law Department will review all proposed transactions presented to or identified by it involving a related person and in which the Company is a participant and in which the amount exceeded $120,000. The Law Department will present to the Audit Committee for approval any transaction at or above this dollar amount in which the related person may have a direct or indirect material interest. In determining whether to approve or ratify a related person transaction, the Audit Committee will consider the following: (1) whether the transaction was the product of fair dealing, which factors include the timing, initiation, structure and negotiations of the transaction, and whether the related person’s interest in such transaction was disclosed to the Company; (2) the terms of the transaction and whether similar terms would have been obtained from an arm’s length transaction with a third party; and (3) the availability of other sources for comparable products or services. The policy also identifies certain types of transactions that our Board has identified as not involving a direct or indirect material interest and are therefore, not considered related person transactions for purposes of the policy.
The policy requires that our Law Department implement certain procedures for the purpose of obtaining information with respect to related person transactions. These procedures include, among other things, (1) informing, on a periodic basis, our directors, nominees for director and executive officers of the requirement for presenting possible related party transactions to the Law Department for review and (2) reviewing questionnaires completed by directors, nominees for director and executive officers designed to elicit information about possible related person transactions.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
There are no reportable transactions pursuant to this requirement.
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10 percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater-than-10-percent stockholders are required by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Due to an administrative error, Forms 4 for reporting exempt transactions by Messrs. Cowart, Hamermesh, Robert Khoury, Chadwell, Schofield and Wegner with respect to quarterly allocations of deferred shares under the Directors Plan from 2001 to 2006 were filed after the relevant due dates. To the Company’s knowledge, during 2008 and 2009, all other Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors
and greater-than-10-percent beneficial owners were complied with. In making the above statements, the Company has relied on the written representations of its directors and officers and a review of the copies of the Section 16(a) reports that have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
PROPOSAL NO. 2
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2010 and presents this appointment to the stockholders for ratification.
Although stockholder approval of this appointment is not required, the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors believe that submitting the appointment to the stockholders for ratification is a matter of good corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will review its future selection of independent registered public accounting firm, but still may retain them. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, at its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
Deloitte & Touche LLP acted as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2009 fiscal year. In addition to its audit of our consolidated financial statements, Deloitte & Touche LLP also audited the financial statements of our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and performed certain non-audit services.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the annual meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to questions.
For information concerning the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP, see Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors on page 12. For information concerning fees paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP, see Principal Accountant Fees and Services on page 43.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present, in person or by proxy and properly cast at the meeting, is required to ratify the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP.
PROPOSAL NO. 3
APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 1994 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
On April 29, 2010, the Board of Directors unanimously approved, subject to stockholder approval, an amendment and restatement of the 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan"). In connection with the amendment and restatement of the Purchase Plan, the Board of Directors approved, subject to stockholder approval, an increase in the number of shares of Common Stock available for purchase under the Purchase Plan from 3,500,000 to 4,000,000, an increase of 500,000 shares. As of April 27, 2010, there were 91,562 shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Purchase Plan.
The Purchase Plan (as amended and restated, including the increase in the number of shares available for issuance thereunder) is being submitted for approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present, in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The following is a summary of the principal provisions of the Purchase Plan (as amended and restated), but is not intended to be a complete description of all of the terms and provisions of the Purchase Plan. This description is qualified by reference to the Purchase Plan document, a copy of which is attached hereto as Annex A.
History.
The Purchase Plan was initially adopted by the Company's Board of Directors on February 1, 1994 and approved by the stockholders on August 11, 1994 and has been periodically amended to increase the number of shares available for issuance thereunder. The Purchase Plan is intended to qualify as an "employee stock purchase plan" within the meaning of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code and will be administered and interpreted in accordance with this provision. On April 27, 2010 the market price of the Common Stock on the NASDAQ National Market was $29.41
.
Administration.
The Purchase Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors which has the right to determine any questions which may arise regarding the interpretation and application of the provisions of the Purchase Plan and to make, administer, and interpret such rules and regulations as it deems necessary. Any determinations will be made by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion and will be final and binding. The Compensation Committee is authorized from time to time to delegate some or all of its authority under the Purchase Plan to a subcommittee or other individuals as it deems necessary, appropriate or advisable.
Eligibility.
Any individual who (i) has been employed by the Company (or its parents or subsidiaries) for at least 90 days, (ii) is customarily employed by the Company (or its parents or subsidiaries) for at least 20 hours per week, and (iii) is customarily employed by the Company (or its parents or subsidiaries) for 5 months or more in any calendar year is eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan, provided that the individual is employed on the first day of an option period and subject to certain limitations imposed by Section 423 and 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. As of April 27, 2010, approximately 3,200 individuals were eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan.
Option Periods.
The Purchase Plan is currently implemented by consecutive 6-month option periods, beginning on January 1
st
and July 1
st
of each year and ending on the last day of June and December, respectively. Shares are issued on the last day of each 6-month option period.
Participation in the Plan.
Eligible employees become participants in the Purchase Plan by executing and delivering to the Company an enrollment form at least 15 days prior to the beginning of an option period (or an earlier date determined by the Compensation Committee). The enrollment form specifies the employee's contribution percentage (between 2% and 15% of "eligible compensation" as defined in the Internal Revenue Code) and authorizes the Company to make payroll deductions for the purchase of shares under the Purchase Plan.
A participant may discontinue his or her participation in the Purchase Plan or may decrease the rate of payroll deductions (but not below 2% of compensation) at any time during the option period by delivering written notice to the Company. Upon a withdrawal from the Purchase Plan during an option period, all payroll deductions for the option period will be returned to the participant in cash, without interest. The participant may not re-elect to participate in the Purchase Plan during the option period but may make a new election to participate in any future option period. Unless the participant's participation is discontinued, the purchase of shares occurs automatically at the end of the option period. Once an employee becomes a participant, he or she will automatically be enrolled in subsequent option periods unless the employee withdraws from the Purchase Plan or becomes ineligible to participate.
Purchase Price.
The purchase price per share at which shares are sold under the Purchase Plan is 85% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the last day of the option period. The fair market value of the Common Stock on a given date is the closing sales price on the NASDAQ National Market as of such date.
Delivery of Shares.
On the last day of the option period, the balance of a participant’s account under the Purchase Plan will be applied to the purchase of the number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the account balance by the purchase price. No fractional shares will be delivered under the Purchase Plan.
Share Purchase Limits.
The maximum number of shares that a participant may purchase during any option period is the number of shares that when multiplied by the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock on the last day of the option period equals $12,500 or less. In addition, no participant will be granted an option under the Purchase Plan which would allow the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that a participant may purchase under the Purchase Plan (or any employee stock purchase plan sponsored by the Company (and its subsidiaries and affiliates)) to accrue at a rate which would exceed $25,000 in fair market value of such shares (determined at the last day of the option period) for each fiscal year in which the option is outstanding at any time. In addition, no participant will be permitted to subscribe for shares under the Purchase Plan if, immediately after the grant of the option, the participant would own 5% or more of the combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or of any of its subsidiaries (including stock that may be purchased under the Purchase Plan or pursuant to any other options).
Termination of Employment; Death.
Upon the termination of a participant's employment with the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates, the participant (i) will immediately cease to participate in the Purchase Plan and (ii) will receive any amounts being held in his or her account. In the event of a participant's death during an option period, the participant's designated beneficiary will be entitled to receive the amount credited to the participant's account or to have the account applied to the purchase of Common Stock at the end of the option period.
Adjustment or Changes in Capitalization.
In the event of any change in the outstanding Common Stock of the Company by reason of a stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, partial or complete liquidation, reclassification, merger, consolidation, reorganization, extraordinary cash dividend, spin-off, split-up, combination or other corporate event or distribution of stock or property affecting the Common Stock, the aggregate number of shares available under the Purchase Plan, the number of shares underlying options under the Purchase Plan and the purchase price of such options will be appropriately adjusted in accordance with Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Dissolution or Liquidation
. U
nless provided otherwise by the Compensation Committee, in the event of the proposed dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the option period then in progress will be shortened by the Compensation Committee setting a new exercise date and shall terminate immediately prior to the consummation of the proposed dissolution or liquidation.
Asset Sale, Merger or Consolidation.
In the event of a proposed sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, or the merger or consolidation of the Company with or into another entity, each outstanding option under the Purchase Plan will be assumed, or an equivalent right to purchase shares substituted, by the successor or resulting entity or a parent or subsidiary of the entity. In lieu of such substitution or assumption, the Committee may elect to shorten any option period then in progress by setting a new exercise date and any option period then in progress will end on the new exercise date.
Non-assignability.
No rights or accumulated payroll deductions of a participant under the Purchase Plan may be pledged, assigned or transferred for any reason during the lifetime of a participant (other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution). If a participant attempts to make such a transfer, any option held by the participant may be terminated by the Company.
Amendment and Termination of the Plan.
The Purchase Plan may be amended by the Board of Directors for any reason subject to applicable laws, rules and regulations. However, if the Board of Directors elects to amend the Purchase Plan to increase the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock available for issuance, the amendment must be approved by the Company's stockholders within twelve months. On April 29, 2010, the Board of Directors amended the Purchase Plan to provide that the plan will remain in effect until December 31, 2018, unless terminated earlier by the Board of Directors.
Certain Federal Income Tax Considerations.
The following is a general summary of certain United States federal income tax consequences under the Purchase Plan based upon the laws as in effect on April 27, 2010. This summary is not a complete description of the possible federal income tax consequences of the Purchase Plan and does not purport to cover possible foreign, state, local, estate, employment or other tax consequences.
The Purchase Plan, and the right of participants to make purchases thereunder, is intended to qualify under the provisions of Section 421 and 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under these provisions, no income will be taxable to a participant at the time of purchase of shares.
Upon disposition of the shares, the participant will be subject to tax and the amount of the tax will depend on the period of time that the participant holds the shares.
|
·
|
If the shares are disposed of by the participant two years or more after the first day of the option period, the lesser of (i) the excess of the fair market value of the Common Stock at the time of such disposition over the purchase price, and (ii) 15% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the first day of the option period, will be treated as ordinary income. The portion of the gain that is in excess of the amount, if any, will be taxed at long-term capital gain rates. If the shares are sold after such time and the sale price is less than the purchase price, the participant recognizes no ordinary income but instead a capital loss for the difference between the sale price and the purchase price.
|
|
·
|
If the shares are disposed of by the participant within two years of the first day of the offering period, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income, in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the last day of the offering period over the purchase price of the Common Stock under the Purchase Plan. In addition, on the disposition of the Common Stock, the participant will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the price at which the Common Stock is disposed of and the cost basis in the Common Stock.
|
The Company is not entitled to a deduction for amounts taxed as ordinary income to a participant except to the extent of ordinary income recognized by participants upon disposition of shares within two years from the date of grant.
New Plan Benefits.
It is not presently possible to determine the benefits or amounts that will be received by any particular employee or groups in the future.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 1994 PURCHASE PLAN DESCRIBED ABOVE AND RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED 1994 PURCHASE PLAN.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes present, in person or by proxy, and properly cast at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (at which a quorum is present) is required to approve the Amended and Restated Purchase Plan.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The Company maintains the following equity compensation plans under which the Company’s common stock is authorized for issuance to employees and directors in exchange for services: 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, Amended and Restated 1989 Stock Option Plan, 1991 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, United Kingdom 1992 Employee Share Option Scheme, 1996 Stock Option Plan, 2001 Stock Option Plan, 2001 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Plan. The United Kingdom 1992 Employee Share Option Scheme and the 1996 Stock Option Plan have not been approved by the Company’s stockholders; the other plans have received the approval of the Company’s stockholders.
The only plans which remain currently active are
the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan
, the Amended and restated 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Plan.
The following table provides aggregate information regarding the shares of common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Available for Future
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Issuance Under Equity
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
Warrants and
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in
|
Plan Category
|
|
Rights(1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Column (a) (2)
|
Equity Compensation Plans approved by security holders(3):
|
|
28,250
|
|
|
|
$10.42
|
|
|
|
2,767,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans not approved by security holders(4):
|
|
129,285
|
|
|
|
7.37
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
157,535
|
|
|
|
$7.92
|
|
|
|
2,767,462
|
|
|
(1)
|
As of December 31, 2009, the weighted average remaining contractual life of all outstanding stock options was 3.8 years.
|
|
(2)
|
Numbers in this column also include rights granted pursuant to the 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and rights under the Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Plan.
|
|
(3)
|
Awards were granted pursuant to the following plans: the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated 1989 Stock Option Plan, the 1991 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the 2001 Stock Option Plan and the 2001 Directors’ Stock Option Plan. The Company will not make any further awards under the 2001 Stock Option Plan, the 2001 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the Amended and Restated 1989 Stock Option Plan or the 1991 Directors’ Stock Option Plan.
|
|
(4)
|
Options were granted pursuant to the following plans: United Kingdom 1992 Employee Share Option Scheme and the 1996 Stock Option Plan. The Company will not make any further awards under these plans.
|
Non-Stockholder Approved Plans.
The material terms of the Company’s non-stockholder approved equity compensation plans are summarized below.
United Kingdom 1992 Employee Share Option Scheme.
The Board of Directors adopted the United Kingdom 1992 Employee Share Option Scheme on July 15, 1992. The UK plan is a United Kingdom Inland Revenue approved plan that provides for the grant of share options to key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries in the United Kingdom.
The exercise price of the share options granted under the UK plan were determined by the Board of Directors and are equal to 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, share options vest as to 25% of the underlying shares on the date of grant and on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. Upon an optionee’s termination of employment with the Company or its subsidiaries for any reason other than death, sick leave, or an approved leave of absence, share options will lapse immediately. In addition, upon a change of control of the Company, share options will generally either (i) vest in full and remain exercisable for a period of fourteen days or (ii) be canceled and replaced with an option to purchase shares of the acquiring corporation with substantially the same terms.
1996 Stock Option Plan.
The Board of Directors adopted the 1996 Stock Option Plan on August 16, 1996. The plan provides for the grant of nonstatutory stock options to employees, consultants and advisers of the Company and its subsidiaries other than directors and executive officers. No further option grants will be made under the plan.
The exercise price of the options is determined by the Board of Directors but will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, options vest as to 25% of the underlying shares on the date of grant and on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant.
Upon an optionee’s termination of employment for any reason other than death or for cause, vested options will generally remain exercisable for three months and unvested options will be immediately forfeited. However, if the optionee has been an employee of the Company for at least 10 years at the time of termination, vested options will generally remain exercisable until the original expiration date. In addition, upon a change of control of the Company either (i) all outstanding options will become immediately exercisable at least 20 days prior to the change of control and will terminate upon the effective date of the change of control or (ii) the Board of Directors will provide for the assumption or replacement of the outstanding options by the surviving corporation resulting from the change of control.
AUDIT MATTERS
Deloitte & Touche LLP has audited the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP is expected to be present at the meeting and will be afforded the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.
When considering Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors considered whether its provision of services to the Company beyond those rendered in connection with its audit and review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements was compatible with maintaining its independence and has determined that such services do not interfere with that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing function. The Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors also reviewed, among other things, the amount of fees paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP for audit and non-audit services.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The following table sets forth by category of service the total fees for services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
2,669
|
|
|
$
|
3,216
|
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,156
|
|
|
$
|
3,991
|
|
Audit fees in 2009 and 2008 consist of aggregate fees, including expenses, billed and reasonably expected to be billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with the annual audit and the audit of internal controls over financial reporting (Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 404), the reviews of the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, statutory audits required for the Company’s subsidiaries and services provided in connection with filing registration statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Audit fees in 2009 and 2008 also include $8,925 and $2,408, respectively, of fees related to work to support the Company’s grant application in Ireland and due diligence services in connection with an acquisition.
Audit-related fees in 2009 and 2008 consist of the aggregate fees, including expenses, billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with the Employee Stock Purchase Plan audit.
Tax fees in 2009 and 2008 consist of the aggregate fees, including expenses, billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with services for tax compliance, tax planning, tax advice and tax audit assistance.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee approves all audit and audit-related services, tax services and other services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP. Any services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP that are not specifically included within the scope of the audit must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee in advance of any engagement. Under the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, Audit Committees are permitted to approve certain fees for audit-related services, tax services and other services pursuant to a
de
minimis
exception prior to the completion of an audit engagement. In 2009, none of the fees paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP were approved pursuant to the
de
minimis
exception.
In making its recommendation to appoint Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, the Audit Committee has considered whether the services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP are compatible with maintaining the independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP and has determined that such services do not interfere with that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing function.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
Proposals of stockholders intended to be presented at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2011 pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act must be received by the Secretary of the Company at its executive offices no later than February 12, 2011 to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for that meeting. For notice of a stockholder proposal to be considered timely, but not included in the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2010 or 2011, a stockholder's proposal must be delivered to, or mailed and received by, the Secretary of the Company in accordance with Section 2.11 of the Company's By-laws.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters that will be brought before the meeting other than as described in this Proxy Statement. However, if any matters properly come before the meeting that are not specifically set forth on the proxy card and in this Proxy Statement, the persons designated as proxies will have authority to vote thereon in accordance with their best judgment.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Our Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are available on our website at www.beaerospace.com.
If you want to receive a paper copy or email .pdf copy of these documents, you must request one. There is no charge. Please contact:
|
BE Aerospace, Inc.
|
|
1400 Corporate Center Way
|
|
Wellington, FL 33414
|
|
Attention: Investor Relations
|
|
Telephone: 561-791-5000
|
Annex A
BE Aerospace, Inc.
1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(Amended and Restated as of ________, 2010)
SECTION 1. PURPOSE OF PLAN
This document amends and restates the BE Aerospace, Inc. 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "
Plan
") as of ________, 2010. The Plan is intended to provide a method by which eligible employees of BE Aerospace, Inc. ("
BE Aerospace
") and of such of BE Aerospace's parents and subsidiaries as BE Aerospace's Board of Directors (the "
Board of Directors
") may from time to time designate (such parents, subsidiaries, together with BE Aerospace, being hereinafter referred to as the "
Company
") may use voluntary, systematic payroll deductions to purchase shares of the Common Stock of BE Aerospace, par value $.01 per share (the "
Stock
") and thereby acquire an interest in the future of BE Aerospace. The Plan is intended to comply with the provisions of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and the regulations and guidance promulgated thereunder (the “
Code
”) and shall be administered, interpreted and construed in accordance with such provisions. For purposes of the Plan, (i) a "
subsidiary
" is any corporation which constitutes a “subsidiary” of BE Aerospace within the meaning of Section 424 of the Code and (ii) a “
parent
” constitutes a “parent” of BE Aerospace within the meaning of Section 424 of the Code.
SECTION 2. OPTIONS TO PURCHASE STOCK
Under the Plan, there is available an aggregate of not more than 4,000,000 shares of Stock (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 14) for sale pursuant to the exercise of options ("
Options
") granted under the Plan. The Stock to be delivered upon exercise of Options under the Plan may be either shares of authorized but unissued Stock or shares of reacquired Stock, as the Board of Directors may determine.
SECTION 3. ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES
(a)
Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, each individual: (i) who is an active Employee of the Company ("
Employee
"); (ii) who has a customary working schedule of at least 20 hours per week; (iii) who has been an Employee for at least 90 days; and (iv) whose customary employment is for five months or more in any calendar year will be eligible to participate in the Plan (each such individual, an "
Eligible Employee
"). From time to time, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “
Compensation Committee
”) may amend the requirements of an Eligible Employee, subject to the provisions of Sections 423 and 424 of the Code.
(b) Any Employee who immediately after the grant of an Option would, in accordance with the provisions of Sections 423 and 424 of the Code, own stock possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of BE Aerospace or any of its parents or subsidiaries, will not be an Eligible Employee.
(c) No Employee will be granted an Option under the Plan which would permit his or her rights to purchase shares of Stock under all employee stock purchase plans of the Company (as defined by Section 423(b) of the Code) to accrue at a rate which exceeds $25,000 in fair market value of such Stock (determined at the time the Option is granted) for each calendar year during which any such Option granted to such Employee is outstanding at any time, as provided in Sections 423 and 424(d) of the Code. For purposes of this limitation, the date of grant of an Option shall be the date on which the Option is exercised pursuant to Section 8. “
Fair market value
” on any given day will mean the Closing Price of the Stock on such day (or, if there was no Closing Price on such day, the latest day prior thereto on which there was a Closing Price). The "
Closing Price
" of the Stock on any business day will be the last sale price as reported on the principal market on which the Stock is traded or, if no last sale is reported, then the mean between the highest bid and lowest asked prices on that day. A good faith determination by the Compensation Committee as to fair market value shall be final and binding.
Annex A