By Josh Zumbrun
In recent weeks, several major rounds of tariffs have moved from
proposals to realities, and major new tariffs have been threatened
-- shifting the stakes for President Donald Trump's trade actions
on the U.S. economy.
Tariffs raise the price of imported goods, increasing costs to
consumers, and making domestic producers (who don't face the
tariff) more competitive.
Examples of how new tariffs might ripple through the economy
have already been provided by earlier, smaller rounds of tariffs.
These earlier examples also show why broad effects from tariffs, on
the otherwise booming U.S. economy, might be hard to detect.
One of the first to go into effect under Mr. Trump came in
January, with the imposition of 20% tariffs on washing
machines.
While tariffs are formally paid by whomever imports the goods,
the importers can pass their costs along to consumers. In the case
of washing machines, that happened quickly: The index for laundry
equipment in the Labor Department's consumer-price Index, the
nation's main gauge of inflation, shot up by about 17% over the
past three months.
That is by far the biggest three-month gain in laundry equipment
in data going back 12 years. But it comes at the end of a period in
which prices had mostly declined for years. Those price declines,
driven by foreign-made products, had placed domestic appliance
producers under pressure to begin with.
The surge, though sharp and clearly inflationary, only put
washing machine prices back to where they had been in June of
2015.
As with any major appliance, consumers don't buy them very
often, and likely don't notice month-to-month price swings. Major
appliances are just one-tenth of 1% of the consumer-price
index.
"Certainly in some industries, or good by good, it has some
material effect," said Stephen Gallagher, managing director of
Société Générale. "In my view it's still not a macro event, though
it could develop to that...right now it's still more of a temper
tantrum on trade, as opposed to a real war."
Mr. Trump's steel and aluminum tariffs were announced March 1.
For some countries they went into effect quickly. The European
Union, Canada and Mexico were given more time to negotiate, but
those extensions expired at the beginning of this month.
Prices for different types of steel and aluminum began to climb
almost immediately, posting the biggest three-month price increase
that has been recorded in years. While clearly inflationary and
unwelcome for metal consumers, the jump in prices isn't that much
larger than typical volatility in the metals. And only a small
portion of the metals ends up in consumer goods.
Even though a car contains several hundred pounds of aluminum,
for example, auto prices haven't notably increased since the
tariffs began. Car sales are down slightly, but that probably owes
more to higher interest rates than to any consumer awareness of the
impact of aluminum tariffs.
In public appearances, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross has
carried around cans of Campbell Soup, holding them up and saying
they have only a few pennies worth of steel in them. The effects
are negative for the soup company -- Campbell's stock has fallen
14% since February, and the company has cited steel tariffs
specifically as a hit to its bottom line -- but Mr. Ross's broader
point is that most consumers won't notice.
The hit to companies like Campbell's is why the effects of the
tariffs tend, overall, to reduce jobs. Far more U.S. companies
consume steel than produce it. By increasing their costs and
reducing their profits, the tariffs have the knock-on effect of
making firms less likely to hire, economist say.
As of mid-2017, there were 29,288 steel-consuming firms,
employing over 900,000 workers who face higher prices versus just
916 steel-producing firms with 80,000 employees who benefit from
those higher prices and reduced competition.
Despite being a direct beneficiary of the washing-machine
tariffs, Whirlpool Corp. is also a metal consumer. Its stock price
jumped about 12% when the washing-machine tariffs were announced
but is down 18% since. In its first-quarter earnings call in April,
Whirlpool said the steel and aluminum tariffs would cost the
company an extra $50 million.
The effects are also like an inflationary tax increase, very
small at this point, but reducing real gross domestic product and
eroding real wages.
Those steel and aluminum tariffs are widening now that Canada,
Mexico and the European Union are hit. As of last week, tariffs
have also been applied to about $50 billion of Chinese imports. Add
this all up, and it's likely to be a noticeable uptick in the
effective tariff rate.
Mr. Gallagher of Société Générale has estimated that the new
rounds of tariffs will push the effective U.S. tariff rate, as
measured by tariff revenue as a percentage of all imports, to 2%
from about 1.5%.
It would be the biggest and sharpest increase in taxes on
customs in well over 30 years, but it would only take trade
restrictions back to where they were in the late 1990s.
Mr. Gallagher's calculations do not include the latest proposal
for tariffs on as much as $400 billion in Chinese imports, nor
proposed tariffs on autos. For now, those tariffs remain just
threats.
The effects remain muted because tariffs, so far, still affect
only a small portion of the roughly $3 trillion a year in imports
that the U.S. is on course to bring in this year. U.S. imports are
about 15% of gross domestic product, compared with a world average
of 28%, according to World Bank data. In other words, despite
running by far the world's largest trade deficit, the U.S. economy
is less reliant on trade than most nations.
In a new analysis, Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's
Analytics, modeled the effects of different trade policy scenarios
on the overall U.S. economy.
His findings show that, in the context of a roaring economy, the
negative impacts will be hard to notice.
The tariffs announced so far would cost the economy about
145,000 jobs by the end of 2019, Mr. Zandi's analysis concluded.
That is less than the total number of jobs created in the broader
economy in an average month.
If tariffs expand to $100 billion extra of Chinese imports, as
well as to other threatened goods such as autos, then the effect
grows, costing the economy over a half million jobs by the end of
2019. Mr. Zandi's analysis was completed before Mr. Trump announced
the possibility of tariffs on $400 billion more of Chinese
goods.
But the labor market is booming, and even under the scenario
with $100 billion in extra imports targeted for tariffs, the
economy is still forecast to add about 2.5 million jobs over the
next 18 months. It's just that without tariffs, it would add 3
million, in Mr. Zandi's analysis.
The basic effects of the tariff "are just like a tax increase,"
said Mr. Zandi, "But we had a very massive tax cut,
deficit-financed, that's temporarily juicing things up this year
and next year, and you're just taking some of that away."
In the scenario of expanding tariffs, GDP would be about 0.34%
lower, by the end of 2019.
"It's all negative," Mr. Zandi said, "but right now, the dollars
and cents are small in the grand scheme of things."
Write to Josh Zumbrun at Josh.Zumbrun@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
June 19, 2018 05:44 ET (09:44 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.