PCFTF Polar Cap Global Financials Tr Plc (PK)

Part I

References in this Annual Report on Form 20-F to “we,” “our” and the “Company” refer to Tower One Wireless Corp. and its predecessor, as applicable, individually and collectively with its subsidiaries as the context requires.

Brief Introduction

Tower One Wireless Corp. is a British Columbia, Canada corporation, incorporated on September 12, 2005. It is a reporting Company in British Columbia and Ontario, and its shares are listed for trading on the Canadian Securities Exchange (“CSE”).

retroactively, and delays in the judicial process; and

• changes in foreign currency exchange rates, including those arising from the Company’s operations, investments and financing transactions related to its international business.

These and other factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are only predictions. The forward-looking events discussed in this Form 20-F and the documents incorporated by reference herein may not occur, and actual events and results may differ materially and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us. Unless required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Risk Factors

An investment in the Common Shares of the Company must be considered highly speculative due to the nature of the Company’s business. The risk and uncertainties below are not the only risks and uncertainties the Company may have. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to the Company or that the Company currently considers immaterial may also impair the business, operations and future prospects of the Company and cause the price of the Common Shares to decline. If any of the following risks actually occur, the business of the Company may be harmed and its financial condition and results of operations may suffer significantly. In addition to the risks described elsewhere and the other information in this Form 20-F, the Company notes the following risk factors:

Company Risks

The Company’s business depends on the demand for wireless communication services and wireless infrastructure, and it may be adversely affected by any slowdown in such demand. Additionally, a reduction in carrier network investment may materially and adversely affect the Company’s business (including reducing demand for new tenant additions or network services).

Demand for the Company’s wireless infrastructure depends on the demand for antenna space from its customers, which, in turn, depends on the demand for wireless communication services by their customers. The willingness of the Company’s customers to utilize its wireless infrastructure, or renew or extend existing leases on its wireless infrastructure, is affected by numerous factors, including:

• consumer demand for wireless connectivity;

• availability or capacity of wireless infrastructure or associated land interests;

• location of wireless infrastructure;

• financial condition of customers, including their profitability and availability or cost of capital;

• willingness of customers to maintain or increase their network investment or changes in their capital allocation strategy;

• availability and cost of spectrum for commercial use;

• increased use of network sharing, roaming, joint development, or resale agreements by customers;

• mergers or consolidations among customers;

• changes in, or success of, customers' business models;

• governmental regulations, including local or state restrictions on the proliferation of wireless infrastructure;

• cost of constructing wireless infrastructure;

• technological changes, including those (1) affecting the number or type of wireless infrastructure needed to provide wireless connectivity to a given geographic area or which may otherwise serve as substitute or alternative to wireless infrastructure or (2) resulting in the obsolescence or decommissioning of certain existing wireless networks; or

• the ability to efficiently satisfy customers' service requirements.

A slowdown in demand for wireless connectivity or wireless infrastructure may negatively impact the Company’s growth or otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Company. If the Company’s customers or potential customers are unable to raise adequate capital to fund their business plans, as a result of disruptions in the financial and credit markets or otherwise, they may reduce their spending, which could adversely affect the Company’s anticipated growth or the demand for the Company’s wireless infrastructure or network services. The amount, timing, and mix of the Company’s customers' network investment is variable and can be significantly impacted by the various matters described in these risk factors. Changes in carrier network investment typically impact the demand for its wireless infrastructure. As a result, changes in carrier plans such as delays in the implementation of new systems, new technologies (including small cells), or plans to expand coverage or capacity may reduce demand for its wireless infrastructure. Furthermore, the wireless industry could experience a slowdown or slowing growth rates as a result of numerous factors, including a reduction in consumer demand for wireless connectivity or general economic conditions. There can be no assurances that weakness or uncertainty in the economic

3

environment will not adversely impact the wireless industry, which may materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, including by reducing demand for its wireless infrastructure or network services. In addition, a slowdown may increase competition for site rental customers or network services. A wireless industry slowdown or a reduction in carrier network investment may materially and adversely affect the Company’s business.

New technologies may reduce demand for wireless infrastructure or negatively impact revenues.

Improvements in the efficiency, architecture, and design of wireless networks may reduce the demand for the Company’s wireless infrastructure. For example, new technologies that may promote network sharing, joint development, or resale agreements by its customers, such as signal combining technologies or network functions virtualization, may reduce the need for the Company’s wireless infrastructure. In addition, other technologies, such as WiFi, DAS, femtocells, other small cells, or satellite (such as low earth orbiting) and mesh transmission systems may, in the future, serve as substitutes for, or alternatives to, leasing that might otherwise be anticipated or expected on wireless infrastructure had such technologies not existed. In addition, new technologies that enhance the range, efficiency, and capacity of wireless equipment could reduce demand for the Company’s wireless infrastructure. Any significant reduction in demand for the Company’s wireless infrastructure resulting from the new technologies may negatively impact the Company’s revenues or otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The expansion or development of the Company’s business, including through acquisitions, increased product offerings or other strategic growth opportunities, may cause disruptions in the Company’s business, which may have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations or financial results.

The Company may seek to expand and develop its business, including through acquisitions, increased product offerings (such as small cells and fiber), or other strategic growth opportunities. In the ordinary course of business, the Company may review, analyze, and evaluate various potential transactions or other activities in which it may engage. Such transactions or activities could cause disruptions in, increase risk or otherwise negatively impact its business. Among other things, such transactions and activities may:

• disrupt the Company’s business relationships with its customers, depending on the nature of or counterparty to such transactions and activities;

• direct the time or attention of management away from other business operations;

• fail to achieve revenue or margin targets, operational synergies or other benefits contemplated;

• increase operational risk or volatility in the Company’s business; or

• result in current or prospective employees experiencing uncertainty about their future roles with the Company, which might adversely affect the Company’s ability to retain or attract key managers or other employees.

If the Company fails to retain rights to its wireless infrastructure, including the land interests, the Company’s business may be adversely affected. The property interests on which the Company’s wireless infrastructure resides, including the land interests under its towers, consist of leasehold interests. A loss of these interests may interfere with the Company’s ability to conduct its business or generate revenues. For various reasons, the Company may not always have the ability to access, analyze, or verify all information regarding titles or other issues prior to purchasing wireless infrastructure. Further, the Company may not be able to renew ground leases on commercially viable terms. The Company’s ability to retain rights to the land interests on which its towers reside depends on its ability to purchase such land, including fee interests and perpetual easements, or renegotiate or extend the terms of the leases relating to such land. If the Company is unable to retain rights to the property interests on which its wireless infrastructure resides, its business may be adversely affected.

Political, economic and other uncertainties in countries where the Company operates could negatively effect the company’s business

The Company’s business operations are currently located in Colombia. Although Colombia has a long-standing tradition of respecting the rule of law, which has been bolstered in recent years by the present government’s policies and programs, no assurance can be given that the Company’s plans and operations will not be adversely affected by future developments in Colombia. The Company’s existing assets and proposed activities in Colombia are subject to political, economic and other uncertainties, including the risk of expropriation, nationalization, renegotiation or nullification of existing contracts, licenses and permits or other agreements, changes in laws or taxation policies, currency exchange restrictions, changing political conditions, and international monetary fluctuations. Future government actions concerning the economy, taxation, or the operation and regulation of nationally important facilities such as communications could have a significant effect on the Company. Any changes in regulations or shifts in political attitudes are beyond the Company’s control and may adversely affect its business. The Company’s business may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on future expansion, price controls, export controls, foreign exchange controls, earnings repatriation, income

4

and/or business taxes or expropriations.

In particular, operating in Columbia presents the following unique risks to the Company’s business and operations:

Legal System

As a civil law jurisdiction, Colombia has a legal system different from the common law jurisdictions of Canada. There can be no assurance that licenses, permits, applications or other legal arrangements will not be adversely affected by changes in governments, the actions of government authorities or others, or the effectiveness and enforcement of such arrangements.

Permits and Licenses

The Company’s business activities in Colombia are dependent on receipt of government approvals or permits to develop its business. Any delays in receiving government approvals or permits or no objection certificates may delay the Company’s operations or may affect the status of the Company’s contractual arrangements or its ability to meet its contractual obligations.

Repatriation of Earnings

Currently there are no restrictions on the repatriation from Colombia of capital and distribution of earnings from Colombia to foreign entities. However, there can be no assurance that restrictions on repatriation of capital or distributions of earnings from Colombia will not be imposed in the future.

Foreign Currency Fluctuations

The Company’s current and proposed business operations in Colombia render it subject to foreign currency fluctuations, which may materially affect its financial position. The Company holds Canadian and U.S. dollars and sends funds to Colombia in U.S. dollars, which are then converted into Colombian pesos. The important exchange rates for the Company are those for the U.S. dollar, Canadian dollar and Colombian peso. While the Company is funding operations in Colombia, its results could be impaired by adverse changes in the U.S. dollar and Canadian dollar relative to the Colombian peso exchange rate. Prior and future equity financings result in the generation of Canadian dollar proceeds to fund the Company’s activities, which are mostly incurred in U.S. dollars or Colombian pesos. To the extent funds from such financings are maintained in Canadian dollars, the Company’s results can be significantly impacted by adverse changes in exchange rates between the Canadian dollar, the U.S. dollar and the Colombian peso.

The Company’s operations may also be adversely affected by laws and policies of Canada affecting foreign trade, taxation and investment. In the event of a dispute arising in connection with the Company’s operations in Colombia, the Company may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or tribunals, or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdictions of the courts of Canada or enforcing Canadian judgments in such other jurisdictions. Company may also be hindered or prevented from enforcing its rights with respect to a governmental body because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Accordingly, the Company’s business activities in Colombia could be substantially affected.

Security and guerrilla activity in Colombia could negatively impact the Company’s business

Colombia has had a publicized history of security problems associated with certain narcotics crime organizations and other terrorist groups. A 40-year armed conflict between the government forces of Colombia and anti-government insurgent groups and illegal paramilitary groups, both thought to be funded by the drug trade, continues in Colombia. Insurgents continue to attack civilians and violent guerrilla activity continues in many parts of the country.

There have been peace negotiations between the government and the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) guerrillas for many years. A recent settlement has been reached to end the conflict, which is intended to bring further institutional strengthening and development, particularly to rural regions. The government’s biggest challenge is to maintain a lasting peace and that demobilized members of the FARC rejoin civilian life, rather than regrouping in criminal bands.

Continuing attempts to reduce or prevent guerrilla activity may disrupt the Company’s operations in the future. The Company may not be able to establish or maintain the safety of its operations and personnel in Colombia and this violence may affect its operations in the future. Any increase in kidnapping and/or terrorist activity in Colombia generally may disrupt supply chains and discourage qualified individuals from being involved in the Company’s operations. Additionally, the perception that matters have not improved in Colombia may hinder the Company’s ability to access capital in a timely or cost effective manner.

5

Social Disruptions and Instability in Columbia could disrupt the Company’s Operations

Generally, companies operating in the telecommunications industry in Columbia have experienced various degrees of interruptions to their operations as a result of social instability. This uncertainty may affect operations in unpredictable ways, including disruptions of access of the Company’s operators to the Company’s towers. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in protecting itself against these risks and the related financial consequences. Further, these risks may not in any part be insurable in the event the Company does suffer damage.

The application of anti-bribery or corruption laws could impact the Company’s operations

The Company’s operations are governed by the laws of many jurisdictions, which generally prohibit bribery and other forms of corruption. It is possible that the Company, or some of its subsidiaries, employees or contractors, could be charged with bribery or corruption as a result of the unauthorized actions of its employees or contractors. If the Company is found guilty of such a violation, which could include a failure to take effective steps to prevent or address corruption by its employees or contractors, the Company could be subject to onerous penalties and reputational damage. A mere investigation itself could lead to significant corporate disruption, high legal costs and forced settlements (such as the imposition of an internal monitor). In addition, bribery allegations or bribery or corruption convictions could impair the Company’s ability to work with governments or nongovernmental organizations. Such convictions or allegations could result in the formal exclusion of the Company from a country or area, national or international lawsuits, government sanctions or fines, project suspension or delays, reduced market capitalization and increased investor concern.

If the Company fails to comply with laws or regulations which regulate its business and which may change at any time, the Company may be fined or even lose its right to conduct some of its business.

A variety of laws and regulations apply to the Company’s business, including the laws of Colombia. Failure to comply with applicable requirements may lead to civil penalties or require the Company to assume indemnification obligations or breach contractual provisions. The Company cannot guarantee that existing or future laws or regulations will not adversely affect its business, or result in additional costs. These factors may have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Company’s industry is heavily regulated and thus the Company is subject to substantial regulatory risks

The activities of the Company are subject to intense regulation by governmental authorities. Achievement of the Company’s business objectives are contingent, in part, upon compliance with regulatory requirements enacted by these governmental authorities and obtaining all regulatory approvals. The Company cannot predict the time required to secure all appropriate regulatory approvals for its products, or the extent of testing and documentation that may be required by governmental authorities. Any delays in obtaining, or failure to obtain regulatory approvals could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of the Company. The business of the Company is subject to rapid regulatory changes. Failure to keep up with such changes may adversely affect the business of the Company and have a detrimental impact on the Company’s business.

Changes in current or future laws or regulations could restrict its ability to operate its business as it currently does

The Company’s business and that of its tenants are subject to various laws and regulations. In certain jurisdictions, these regulations could be applied or enforced retroactively, which could require that the Company modify or dismantle existing towers. Since the Company’s operating subsidiary, Tower Three SAS (“Tower Three”), is incorporated in Colombia it is thus it is subject to the laws of such jurisdiction. The Colombian Ministry of Communications has a protocol aimed to explain to local authorities and communities the existence of environmental impacts and negative effects on the health of the people. Zoning authorities and community organizations are often opposed to construction of communications sites in their communities, which can delay, prevent or increase the cost of new tower construction, modifications, additions of new antennas to a site or site upgrades, thereby limiting the Company’s ability to respond to tenant demands. The regulations about distance of cell towers to schools, hospitals, and residences, depend on local authorities, as in Colombia the mayors of municipalities have the power to regulate in an autonomous way the matters related to telecommunication infrastructure. Existing regulatory policies may materially and adversely affect the timing or cost of construction projects associated with the Company’s communications sites and new regulations may be adopted that increase delays or result in additional costs to the Company, or that prevent such projects in certain locations, and noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants. In certain jurisdictions, there may be changes to zoning regulations or construction laws based on site location, which may result in increased costs to modify certain of the Company’s existing towers or decreased revenue due to the removal of certain towers to ensure compliance with such changes. These factors could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.

6

Changes to the tax laws in Colombia could negatively impact the Company’s business and operations.

The introduction of new tax laws, regulations or rules, or changes to, or differing interpretation of, or application of, existing tax laws, regulations or rules in Colombia, could result in an increase in the Company’s taxes, or other governmental charges, duties or impositions. No assurance can be given that new tax laws, regulations or rules will not be enacted or that existing tax laws, regulations or rules will not be changed, interpreted or applied in a manner which could result in any of the Company’s profits being subject to additional taxation or which could otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Company.

If radio frequency emissions from wireless handsets or equipment on wireless infrastructure are demonstrated to cause negative health effects, potential future claims could adversely affect the Company’s operations, costs or revenues.

The potential connection between radio frequency emissions and certain negative health effects, including some forms of cancer, has been the subject of substantial study by the scientific community in recent years. The Company cannot guarantee that claims relating to radio frequency emissions will not arise in the future or that the results of such studies will not be adverse to the Company. Public perception of possible health risks associated with cellular or other wireless connectivity services may slow or diminish the growth of wireless companies, which may in turn slow or diminish the Company’s growth. In particular, negative public perception of, and regulations regarding, these perceived health risks may slow or diminish the market acceptance of wireless services. If a connection between radio frequency emissions and possible negative health effects were established, the Company’s operations, costs, or revenues may be materially and adversely affected. The Company currently does not maintain any significant insurance with respect to these matters.

The Company may be vulnerable to security breaches that could adversely affect its operations, business, operations, and reputation.

The Company’s wireless infrastructure may be vulnerable to damage, disruptions, or shutdowns due to unauthorized access, computer viruses, cyber-attacks, and other security breaches. An attack attempt or security breach could potentially result in (1) interruption or cessation of certain of the Company’s services to its customers, (2) the Company’s inability to meet expected levels of service, or (3) data transmitted over the Company’s customers' networks being compromised. The Company cannot guarantee that its security measures will not be circumvented, resulting in customer network failures or interruptions that could impact its customers' network availability and have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, or operational results. The Company may be required to expend significant resources to protect against or recover from such threats. If an actual or perceived breach of its security occurs, the market perception of the effectiveness of its security measures could be harmed, and the Company could lose customers. Further, the perpetrators of cyber-attacks are not restricted to particular groups or persons. These attacks may be committed by the Company’s employees, contractors or external actors operating in any geography. Any such events could result in legal claims or penalties, disruption in operations, misappropriation of sensitive data, damage to the Company’s reputation, negative market perception, or costly response measures, which could adversely affect its business.

If the Company is unable to protect its rights to the land under its towers, its business and operating results would be adversely effected

The Company’s real property interests relating to its towers consist primarily of leasehold and sub-leasehold interests. A loss of these interests at a particular tower site may interfere with the Company’s ability to operate tower sites and generate revenues. For various reasons, the Company may not always have the ability to access, analyze and verify all information regarding titles and other issues prior to completing an acquisition of communications sites, which can affect its rights to access and operate a site. From time to time the Company may also experience disputes with landowners regarding the terms of ground agreements for land under towers, which may affect the Company’s ability to access and operate tower sites. Further, for various reasons, landowners may not want to renew their ground agreements with the Company, they may lose their rights to the land, or they may transfer their land interests to third parties, including ground lease aggregators, which could affect the Company’s ability to renew ground agreements on commercially viable terms. The Company’s inability to protect its rights to the land under its towers may have a material adverse effect on its business and operating results.

The Company could have liability under environmental and occupational safety and health laws.

The Company’s operations are subject to the requirements of environmental and occupational safety and health laws and regulations, including municipal zoning regulations and height restrictions imposed by the Colombian DAAC-FAN (Colombia’s FAA). Many of these laws and regulations contain information reporting and record keeping requirements. The Company may not be at all times in compliance with all environmental requirements. The Company may be subject to

7

potentially significant fines or penalties if it fail to comply with any of these requirements. The requirements of these laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and could become more stringent in the future. In certain jurisdictions these laws and regulations could be applied or enforced retroactively. It is possible that these requirements will change or that liabilities will arise in the future in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.

The Company’s towers, data centers or computer systems may be affected by natural disasters and other unforeseen events for which the Company’s insurance may not provide adequate coverage.

The Company’s towers are subject to risks associated with natural disasters, such as ice and wind storms, tornadoes, floods, hurricanes and earthquakes, as well as other unforeseen events, such as acts of terrorism. Any damage or destruction to, or inability to access, its towers or data centers may impact its ability to provide services to its tenants and lead to tenant loss, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations or financial condition.

As part of the Company’s normal business activities, it relies on information technology and other computer resources to carry out important operational, reporting and compliance activities and to maintain its business records. The Company’s computer systems could fail on their own accord and are subject to interruption or damage from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches (including through cyber-attack and data theft), usage errors, catastrophic events such as natural disasters and other events beyond its control. Although the Company has disaster recovery programs and security measures in place, if the Company’s computer systems and its backup systems are compromised, degraded, damaged, or breached, or otherwise cease to function properly, it could suffer interruptions in its operations or unintentionally allow misappropriation of proprietary or confidential information (including information about its tenants or landlords), which could damage the Company’s reputation and require the Company to incur significant costs to remediate or otherwise resolve these issues.

While the Company maintains insurance coverage for natural disasters, the Company may not have adequate insurance to cover the associated costs of repair or reconstruction for a major future event. Further, the Company may be liable for damage caused by towers that collapse for any number of reasons including structural deficiencies, which could harm the Company’s reputation and require it to incur costs for which it may not have adequate insurance coverage.

The Company’s operations are primarily in jurisdictions outside of Canada or the United States and consequently the Company is subject to the risks of foreign operations generally

Currently the Company’s operations are conducted in foreign jurisdictions including, but not limited to Colombia. The Company expects that receivables with respect to foreign sales will continue to account for a significant portion of its total accounts and receivables outstanding. As such, the Company’s operations may be adversely affected by changes in foreign government policies and legislation or social instability and other factors which are not within the control of the Company including, but not limited to, recessions in foreign economies, expropriation, nationalization and limitation or restriction on repatriation of earnings, longer receivables collection periods and greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable, changes in consumer tastes and trends, renegotiation or nullification of existing contracts or licenses, regulatory requirements or the personnel administering them, currency fluctuations and devaluations, exchange controls, economic sanctions and royalty and tax increases, risk of terrorist activities, revolution, border disputes, implementation of tariffs and other trade barriers and protectionist practices, taxation policies, including royalty and tax increases and retroactive tax claims, volatility of financial markets and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, difficulties in the protection of intellectual property, labor disputes and other risks arising out of foreign governmental sovereignty over the areas in which the Company’s operations are conducted. The Company’s operations may also be adversely affected by social, political and economic instability and by laws and policies of such foreign jurisdictions affecting foreign trade, taxation and investment. If the Company’s operations are disrupted and/or the economic integrity of its contracts is threatened for unexpected reasons, its business may be harmed.

In the event of a dispute arising in connection with the Company’s operations in a foreign jurisdiction where the Company conducts its business, the Company may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdictions of the courts of Canada or enforcing Canadian judgments in such other jurisdictions. The Company may also be hindered or prevented from enforcing its rights with respect to a governmental instrumentality because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Accordingly, the Company’s activities in foreign jurisdictions could be substantially affected by factors beyond the Company’s control, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Some countries in which the Company may operate may be considered politically and economically unstable and in some cases, failure to follow certain formalities or obtain relevant evidence may call into question the validity of the entity or the actions taken by the Company. Management of the Company is unable to predict the effect of additional corporate and

8

regulatory formalities which may be adopted in the future including whether any such laws or regulations would materially increase the Company’s cost of doing business or affect its operations in any area.

The Company may in the future enter into agreements and conduct activities outside of the jurisdictions where it currently carries on business, which expansion may present challenges and risks that the Company has not faced in the past, any of which could adversely affect the results of operations and/or financial condition of the Company.

The Company has a limited operating history

The Company will be subject to all of the business risks and uncertainties associated with any new business enterprise, including under-capitalization, cash shortages, limitations with respect to personnel, financial and other resources, lack of revenue and the risk that it will not achieve its growth objective. There can be no assurance that the Company’s operations will be profitable in the future or will generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy its working capital requirements. Even if the Company does achieve profitability, it cannot predict the level of such profitability. If the Company sustains losses over an extended period of time, it may be unable to continue its business.

A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from our relationship with one tenant

A substantial portion of our total operating revenues is derived from our leasing agreements with Millicom International Cellular SA. If they are unwilling or unable to perform their obligations under our agreements with them, our revenues, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity would be materially and adversely affected. Additionally, due to the long-term nature of our tenant leases with Millicom International Cellular SA, we depend on the continued financial strength of them. If our current tenant or any future tenants are unable to raise adequate capital to fund their business plans, they may reduce their spending, which could materially and adversely affect demand for our communications sites and our services business. If, as a result of a prolonged economic downturn or otherwise, one or more of our significant tenants experiences financial difficulties or files for bankruptcy, it could result in uncollectible accounts receivable. The loss of our current tenant, or the loss of all or a portion of our anticipated lease revenues from this tenant or future tenants, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

The Company is reliant on its management and key personnel

The success of the Company is dependent upon the ability, expertise, judgment, discretion and good faith of its senior management. While employment agreements are customarily used as a primary method of retaining the services of key employees, these agreements cannot assure the continued services of such employees. The Company attempts to enhance its management and technical expertise by recruiting qualified individuals who possess desired skills and experience in certain targeted areas. The Company’s inability to retain employees and attract and retain sufficient additional employees as well as, engineering, and technical support resources could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operation. Any loss of the services of such individuals could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results or financial condition.

The Company conducts business in countries with a history of corruption and transactions with foreign governments and doing so increases the risks associated with our international activities.

As we operate internationally, we are subject to the United States’ Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other laws that prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign governments and their officials and political parties by the United States and other business entities that have securities registered in the United States for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We have operations and agreements with third parties in countries known to experience corruption. Further international expansion may involve more exposure to such practices. Our activities in these countries create the risk of unauthorized payments or offers of payments by our employees or consultants that could be in violation of various laws including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, even though these parties are not always subject to our control. It is our policy to implement safeguards to discourage these practices by our employees and consultants. However, our existing safeguards and any future improvements may prove to be less than effective and our employees or consultants may engage in conduct for which we might be held responsible. Violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act may result in criminal or civil sanctions and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could negatively affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

The Company has never paid dividends and has no intention of paying dividends

The Company has no earnings or dividend record, and does not anticipate paying any dividends on the common shares in the

9

foreseeable future. Dividends paid by the Company would be subject to tax and, potentially, withholdings. The payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be reviewed periodically by the Company’s board of directors and will depend upon, among other things, conditions then existing including earnings, financial condition and capital requirements, restrictions in financing agreements, business opportunities and conditions and other factors.

The Company is subject to a going-concern risk

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis under which an entity is considered to be able to realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The Company’s future operations are dependent upon the identification and successful completion of equity or debt financing and the achievement of profitable operations at an indeterminate time in the future. There can be no assurances that the Company will be successful in completing an equity or debt financing or in achieving profitability. The financial statements do not give effect to any adjustments relating to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities that would be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

pursuant to a share exchange agreement made effective as of October 19, 2016, as amended (the “Acquisition Agreement”) among the Company, Tower Three and the shareholders of Tower Three (the “Selling Shareholders”), whereby the Company acquired 100% of the securities of Tower Three from the Selling Shareholders, by issuing 30,000,000 common shares of the Company to the Selling Shareholders on a pro-rata basis, following the completion of which, Tower Three is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Following the completion of the Tower Three Transaction, the Company began conducting the principal business of Tower Three.

The Company’s board of directors (the Board”) was reconstituted in conjunction with the closing of the Tower Three Transaction. The Board is now comprised of four (4) members, being Alejandro Ochoa, Fabio Alexander Vasquez, Robert Horsley, and Brian Gusko. The Company’s senior management now consists of Alejandro Ochoa (President and Chief Executive Officer), Abbey Abdiye (Chief Financial Officer), and Octavio De La Espriella (Chief Operating Officer). See “Directors and Officers” below for further information.

Inter-Corporate Relationships

Upon the completion of the Tower Three Transaction, Tower Three became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Tower Three also has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Fundacion Communicar Para Educar” (“FCPE”) a Columbia Foundation, which is a non-profit initiative established with the goal of creating and distributing educational devices for the developing world.

Additionally, in February 2017, the Company incorporated a wholly-owned subsidiary in Argentina called Tower Three SAS and in March 2017, the Company incorporated a subsidiary in Columbia called Tower Two SAS, which is intended to purchase and own the real estate on which the Company’s planned cellular towers in Columbia will be built.

Private Placement

Concurrent with the closing of the Tower Three Transaction, the Company completed a private placement (the “Private Placement”) of units (the “Units”), at a price of $0.15 per Unit for gross proceeds of $2,322,737. Each Unit consisted of one share of the Company’s common stock ( a “Common Share”) and one transferable Common Share purchase warrant ( a “Warrant”), with each whole Warrant entitling the holder to purchase, for a period of 12 months from the date of issue, one additional Common Share at an exercise price of $0.40 per Common Share. The Warrants also have an acceleration clause whereby if the closing price of the Common Shares is greater than $0.60 per Common Share for a period of ten (10) consecutive trading days, the Company will have the right to accelerate the expiry of the Warrants by giving notice to the holders of the Warrants by news release or other form of notice permitted by the certificate representing the Warrants that the Warrants will expire at 4:30 p.m. (Vancouver time) on a date that is not less than ten (10) days from the date notice is given. As compensation for raising proceeds under the Private Placement, eligible finders and brokers received cash commission of 8% of the gross proceeds raised in the Private Placement and compensation Warrants (the “Financing Warrants”) entitling the finder or broker to purchase Common Shares up to 8% of the number of Placement Units sold in the Private Placement, exercisable at a price of $0.40(Cdn) per Common Share for a period of 12 months from the date of issuance of the Financing Warrants, subject to an acceleration provision.

B. Business Overview

Current Operations

Upon the closing of the Tower Three Transaction, Tower Three became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The primary business of the Company is now the business of Tower Three, which is to develop, own and operate multitenant communications real estate primarily in Latin America. Tower Three was founded in 2015 as a Columbian corporation with a mission to own and operate cellular network infrastructure sites in specific Latin and South American markets that Tower Three believes are experiencing strong usage growth. Tower Three currently has six (6) cellular towers with four (4) located in Velledupar, Colombia, one (1) in Soledad, Colombia, and one (1) in Bogota, Colombia. Tower Three focuses primarily on building towers in municipalities where there is limited or no cellular coverage and is currently focused on 4G LTE infrastructure expansion in Colombia.

The Company’s revenues primarily come from the leasing of space on its communications sites to wireless service providers, radio and television broadcast companies, wireless data providers, government agencies and municipalities and tenants in a number of other industries. Tower Three has established a business relationship with Millicom International Cellular SA (“Millicom”) a large international telecommunications and media company, whereby Millicom has agreed to rent each of the Company’s six cellular towers for a period of 13 years. Since the rental contracts are non-exclusive, Tower Three can enter into additional rental agreements for each tower so that multiple service providers can rent space on the same tower, thereby

11

increasing the revenue generated per tower.

The Company also operates FCPE, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tower Three, which is a non-profit initiative established with the goal of creating and distributing educational devices for the developing world.

Products and Services

Our revenue is primarily derived from tenant leases on the six cellular towers we own and operate in Columbia. The amount of rental payments we receive from these towers depend upon tower location, amount, type and position of tenant equipment on the tower, ground space required by the tenant and remaining tower capacity. Our costs typically include ground rent and power and fuel costs, some or all of which may be passed through to our tenants, as well as property taxes and repairs and maintenance expenses. We currently have leased each of our six towers to Millicom under separate 13 year leases, which expire in 2029. Under the terms of each of these leases Millicom pays a monthly $1,000 (USD) per tower fee to Tower Three to use the towers by installing antennas on such towers.

Currently, all of the Company’s operating revenues are derived from Tower Three’s operations in Columbia.

Business Strategy

Tower Development

After the completion of the Tower Three Transaction, the Company now focuses primarily on building cellular towers in municipalities where there is limited or no cellular coverage and is currently focused on 4G LTE infrastructure expansion in Colombia. The Company currently intends to complete the construction of a total of 15 cellular towers at a total cost $800,000 by the end of December 2017. Tower Three works with local and regional government departments to ensure that its locations and properties can be licensed quickly and effectively by carriers and operators or even shared. Tower Three’s objective is to build each site within thirty days and have the operator hopefully up and running within sixty days. Tower Three’s towers and sites will be home to cellular and wireless, radio and television broadcast, microwave and two-way radio communications equipment

Tower Three has identified the coverage needs of a variety of Colombia-based cellular operators, and intends to develop cellular site plans in several target cities in Columbia including the following:

• Cali;

• Cartagena;

• Santa Marta;

• Bucaramanga; and

• Cucuta / Barranquilla.

The Company intends to use the proceeds from the Private Placement for tower construction, sales and marketing and general working capital. This funding expected to enable Tower Three to hire full time employees and consultants immediately and over the next 12 months.

Vertical Partnerships

We believe that demand for our communication services is primarily drive by incumbent wireless service providers investing in existing voice networks to improve or expand their coverage and increase capacity and increasing the availability of lower cost smartphones. It is our belief that in order to invest in the coverage, quality and capacity of their networks, wireless carriers in Latin America will continue to outsource their communications site infrastructure needs as a means to accelerate network development, rather than construct and operate their own communications sites.

The Company plans to continue to build joint venture “market vertical” partners with wireless service providers such as Millicom. The Company intends to leverage its relationship with Millicom, which has operations throughout the world, and other wireless carriers so as to enable them to deploy 4G LTE networks in Columbia as quickly and cost-effectively as possible.

Community Involvement

In addition, it is the intention of the Company that every Tower Three tower will offer the local community free WiFi and

12

help to create community websites so as to enhance community well-being and integration. Integral to Tower Three’s business penetration strategy is its planned role as being a leading corporate citizen helping local markets. Consequently, Tower Three attempts to combine social and community efforts (free Wifi, programs, prizes, etc.) with its current business operations in local cities and towns so as to bolster its reputation and corporate involvement.

The Telecommunications Market in Latin America

General

Despite considerable progress in building out mobile broadband networks in Latin America over recent years (there are currently over 160,000 towers in Latin America), approximately 10% of the population, or approximately 64 million people, still have no access to a mobile broadband network in the region. Latin America is characterized by densely populated and sprawling cities, but also by vast, sparsely populated areas, mountain ranges, rainforests and islands. Although most people live in urban or suburban areas, it is the small proportion of people living in rural areas (20% of the population) that are most likely to currently be without access to mobile broadband. Although the business model utilized by mobile carriers has so far proven effective in expanding coverage to current levels, the Company believes that moving further into remote areas through traditional network deployment is a much greater challenge, owing to the sparsely populated unconnected areas, the difficult economic situation in many Latin American countries, the high cost of investment with limited potential for return, and a challenging market environment that often makes coverage expansion uneconomical. As a result, mobile operators are increasingly adopting alternative methods, notably infrastructure sharing and partnerships with other ecosystem players, to complement traditional network deployments. The Company believes that governments in the region want to make access to and use of mobile broadband universal, a goal shared by mobile operators, which the Company expects will require a multidimensional approach and collaboration between governments and the mobile industry, with the former supporting industry-led initiatives with policies and programs that create the right incentives and an enabling environment for extending connectivity to underserved areas. The Company also believes that in many cases mobile operators’ efforts to improve coverage are hampered by inefficient and arduous regulation from governments and policymakers, including onerous coverage obligations, strict quality-of-service (“QoS”) expectations, and restrictive planning laws around new infrastructure deployment which, together, make for a challenging regulatory environment.

Additionally, of the 90% of the population of Latin America who have access to mobile broadband services, just over 160 million people, or approximately a quarter of the population, subscribed to such services. This means that three-quarters of the population do not currently subscribe to mobile broadband services, primarily due to affordability and/or consumer challenges.

The Columbian Market

With an estimated 48 million people in 2015, Colombia is the third-most populous country in Latin America, after Brazil and Mexico. It is also home to the third-largest number of Spanish speakers in the world after Mexico and the United States.

Mobile operators in Latin America face a tough balancing act in allocating capital across multiple divergent needs: investing in network expansion projects to meet coverage obligations, or boosting network capacity in existing service areas to address QoS expectations (most countries in Latin America have more than 3,500 connections per base station, compared to around 1,000 or fewer in the US and other developed markets). The Company believes that this puts an additional burden on mobile operators and inadvertently weakens the business case for investment in coverage expansion. We believe that tower firms –like Tower Three – have a role to play in creating and sustaining an enabling environment for effective investment in infrastructure deployment for carriers and operators. Tower Three’s infrastructure sharing is intended to enable mobile operators to deploy networks more efficiently, optimize asset utilization and reduce running costs compared with standalone deployment by the carrier. It is also designed to minimizes duplication of infrastructure, which has come under the spotlight in many countries due to growing environmental and public safety concerns. There are two broad forms of infrastructure sharing: passive and active. With passive infrastructure sharing, tower firms allow operators to share physical components of a cell site (e.g. installing multiple antennas on a single tower). With active infrastructure sharing, tower firms enable operators to share the radio access network (RAN) or, at a more advanced level, the core network. Tower Three engages in both types of infrastructure sharing.

Competition

The Company operates in a very competitive industry, with a number of competitors who vary in size from very small organizations to large public companies. We believe that price, network density, speed of service, quality and site location and capacity are the primary competitive factors affecting companies in our industry. Although some of the Company’s competitors, such as American Tower Corp. (“AMT”), have invested large amounts of monies in telecommunications

13

infrastructure in Latin America; AMT has 3,500 towers in Colombia and more than 12,000 across Latin America, the Company’s management believes there is ample room for its business to serve clients in certain districts of Colombia and Latin America where local issues and situations make Tower Three’s locations more suitable than our competitors.

Seasonality

Not Applicable

Legal Proceedings

We are not currently a party to any material legal proceeding. From time to time, we may bring against others or be subject to various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.

C. Organizational structure

The Company has the following wholly-owned subsidiaries:

Tower Three
Tower Three SAS (Argentina); and
Tower Two SAS (Columbia)

D. Property, plant and equipment.

The Company has six cellular towers with four located in Valledupar, Colombia, one in Soledad, Colombia, and one in Bogota, Colombia.

Our interests in our communications sites are comprised of a variety of ownership interests, including leases created by long-term ground lease agreements, easements, licenses or rights-of-way granted by government entities. A typical tower site consists of a compound enclosing the tower site, a tower structure and one or more equipment shelters that house a variety of transmitting, receiving and switching equipment. In addition, our sites typically include backup or auxiliary power generators and batteries. The principal types of our towers are guyed and monopole tower. A guyed tower includes a series of cables attaching separate levels of the tower to anchor foundations in the ground and can reach heights of up to 2,000 feet. A guyed tower site for a typical broadcast tower can consist of a tract of land of up to 20 acres, while a monopole tower is a tubular structure that is used primarily to address space constraints or aesthetic concerns. Monopoles typically have heights ranging from 50 to 200 feet. A monopole tower site used in metropolitan areas for a typical wireless communications tower can consist of a tract of land of fewer than 2,500 square feet

Our head office is located at 600-535 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 2Z4 Canada. We currently lease this office location.

We also maintain regional offices in Columbia at: 8A #99-22 Unit 903, Bogota, Colombia, and in Argentina at: 555 TTe. Gral Juan Domingo Peron, Piso 2, Buenos Aires, Argentina. We currently lease these office locations.

Dysfunction (ED) and other indications. The Company’s lead compound for Fibrosis, PTL-202 is a combination of already approved drugs which have well established safety profiles. PTL-202 had completed a phase 1 drug/ drug interaction clinical trial. The Company’s previous lead product for Erectile Dysfunction PTL-2015 was an oral dissolving version of a top selling therapy for ED. PTL-2015 had completed a pilot bioavailability study in humans. Forge has committed to issue to the Company.

As discussed above, as a result of the sale of its technology assets pursuant to the Forge Agreement and the acquisitions of Tower Three’s assets in the Tower Three Transaction, the Company now focuses primarily on building cellular towers in municipalities where there is limited or no cellular coverage and is currently focused on 4G LTE infrastructure expansion in Colombia. The Company currently has six (6) cellular towers with four (4) located in Velledupar, Colombia, one (1) in Soledad, Colombia, and one (1) in Bogota, Colombia and currently intends to complete the construction of a total of 15 cellular towers at a total cost $800,000 by the end of December 2017. The Company’s current revenue is primarily derived from tenant leases on the six cellular towers they own and operate in Columbia (the Company currently have leased each of its six towers to Millicom under separate 13 year leases, which expire in 2029).

Corporate Highlights

During the twelve months of 2016 the Issuer accomplished the following:

• On February 1, 2016 the Company announced it appointed Robert “Nick” Horsley to the Company’s Board of Directors.

• On March 7, 2016 the Company announced it entered into a joint-venture to develop an early stage immune boosting herbal supplement with TrueVita Supplements.

• On March 15, 2016, the Company completed a share consolidation on the basis of thirty pre-consolidation shares of common stock for each post consolidation common share. Following such consolidation, the Company had approximately 1,379,887 common shares issued and outstanding, and continued to trade on the CSE under the existing symbol “PT”.

• On March 30, 2016 completed a private placement of 4,089,332 shares at $0.06 per share for gross proceeds of $245,360.

• On March 30, 2016, the Company appointed Robert “Nick” Horsley as the chief executive officer, replacing Derick Sinclair who remained a director and the Company’s chief financial officer.

• On July 26, 2016, the Company entered into a letter of intent (the “LOI”) with Tower Three to acquire all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of Tower Three.

• On October 14, 2016, the Company announced that the previously announced Arrangement with Cabbay was completed. In connection with the Arrangement, $440,549 of indebtedness was assigned to and assumed by Cabbay.

• On October 20, 2016, the Company announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement in connection with the Tower Three Transaction.

• On January 12, 2017, the Company completed the Tower Three Transaction.

The Company’s net loss for the year ended December 31, 2016, totaled $452,288 or $0.09 per share compared to net income of $179,673 or $0.13 per share for the year ended December 31, 2015 and a net loss of $693,645 or $0.56 per share for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in net income in 2016 from 2015 (and the increase in net income in 2015 compared to 2014) was primarily the result of the Company assigning a significant amount of its debt to Forge, which resulted in income recognized by a one-time $535,077 forgiveness of debt in 2015.

Revenues

The Company has not generated any revenue from the sale of drug therapies. The Company has not recognized any revenue since inception through December 31, 2016. As a result of the Tower Three Transaction, the Company expects to generate revenues in 2017 mostly through monthly fees paid by Millicom in connection with the six towers currently leased to Millicom, as well as from similar lease agreements for other towers the Company plans to construct in 2017.

Expenses

Prior to the completion of the Tower Three Transaction, the Company’s expenses consisted primarily of general and administrative costs such as personnel related costs, non-intellectual property related legal costs, accounting costs and other professional and administrative costs associated with general corporate activities.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, total expenses for the Company were $452,809 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 where total expenses were $284,863. The increased expenses in 2016 compared to the prior year was mainly the result of increased professional fees of $221,928, increased office and miscellaneous expenses of $30,509 and share based payments of $63,507, being partially offset by reduced wages and benefits of $106,667 during the current year compared to 2015. Expenses incurred from share based payments in 2016 primarily resulted from the issuance of 500,000 stock options to employees in August 2016, while the increase in professional fees in 2016 compared to the prior year was mainly the result of increased, financial, accounting and legal fees incurred by the Company in connection with the Tower Three Transaction, the Arrangement and the Private Placement. The increase in office and miscellaneous expenses in 2016 compared to the prior year was primarily the result of expenses related to permits and related expenses in connection with the building the Company’s towers in 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, total expenses for the Company were $691,033, which was $406,170 higher than the total expenses incurred during the year ended December 31, 2015. Expenses decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to a decrease in share based payments of $140,030 in 2015 compared to 2014, a decrease in professional fees of $83,004 in 2015 compared to 2014 and a decrease in wages in benefits of $54,280 in 2015 compared to 2014. These decreases in expenses were mostly the result of a reduction in the Company’s operating activities in 2015, primarily the result of the sale of certain of the Company’s technological assets to Forge during that year.

Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets

All license and option fees paid to licensors for intellectual property licenses are capitalized to intangible assets on the Company’s financial statements. In addition, any expenses for intellectual property protection including patent lawyers services fees and any filing fees with government agencies or the World Intellectual Property Organization are accrued to intangible assets. Since all of the Company’s patents were assigned to Forge, and the Company completed the Tower Three Transaction, the Company does not anticipate patent costs to be a significant expense of the Company moving forward.

16

Interest Income

Interest income consists of interest earned on the Company’s cash and cash equivalents. There was interest income in 2016 of $Nil (2015- $Nil, 2014 – $Nil).

Impact of Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our revenues or income over the past two fiscal years. However, increases in inflation could result in increases in our expenses, which may not be readily recoverable in the price of goods or services provided to our clients. To the extent that inflation results in rising interest rates and has other adverse effects on capital markets, it could adversely affect our financial position and profitability.

Foreign Currency Fluctuations

Foreign exchange risk is the risk arising from changes in foreign currency fluctuations. Foreign currency fluctuations have not previously had a material impact on the Company’s financial results. Consequently, the Company does not use any derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency rates. It is the opinion of management that the foreign exchange risk to which the Company is exposed is currently minimal.

However, with the completion of the Tower Three Transaction, the Company anticipates that the fluctuations of the Columbian Peso may impact the Company’s financial results moving forward. The Company intends to monitor such potential impact and will possibly develop a hedging policy if such fluctuations become material.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The Company’s accounting policies are presented in Note 3 of the audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) requires management to select accounting policies and make estimates. Such estimates may have a significant impact on the financial statements. Actual amounts could differ materially from the estimates used and, accordingly, affect the results of the operations. These include:

• the assumptions used for the determination of the impairment of intangible assets;

• the assumptions used for the determination of the useful life of intangible assets; and

• the assumptions used for the determination of the value share based payments and compensation.

Regulation

Our tower leasing business is subject to Columbian national, state and local regulatory requirements with respect to the construction, registration, marking and maintenance of our towers. Colombia is divided into 32 departments and one capital district, which is treated as a department (Bogotá also serves as the capital of the department of Cundinamarca). Departments are subdivided into municipalities, each of which is assigned a municipal seat, and municipalities are in turn subdivided into corregimientos in rural areas and into comunas in urban areas. Each department has a local government with a governor and assembly directly elected to four-year terms, and each municipality is headed by a mayor and council. There is a popularly elected local administrative board in each of the corregimientos or comunas. In addition to the capital four other cities have been designated districts (in effect special municipalities), on the basis of special distinguishing features. These are Barranquilla, Cartagena, Santa Marta and Buenaventura. Some departments have local administrative subdivisions, where towns have a large concentration of population and municipalities are near each other (for example in Antioquia and Cundinamarca). Where departments have a low population (for example Amazonas, Vaupés and Vichada), special administrative divisions are employed, such as “department corregimientos”, which are a hybrid of a municipality and a corregimiento. The majority of existing infrastructure in remote areas, including buildings, open spaces such as parks and squares, legacy fixed-line telecoms infrastructure and public utilities, is owned by governments and public institutions.

For infrastructure deployment and antenna siting, mobile operators and tower companies need to obtain local approvals from municipalities for each antenna or tower site. The absence of a clear national policy can lead to each municipality adopting its own policy and procedures that are sometimes in conflict with the technical requirements of deploying mobile networks.

17