NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “FCPT”) is an independent, publicly traded, self-administered company, primarily engaged in the ownership, acquisition and leasing of restaurant properties. Substantially all of our business is conducted through Four Corners Operating Partnership, LP (“FCPT OP”), a Delaware limited partnership of which we are the initial and substantial limited partner. Our wholly owned subsidiary, Four Corners GP, LLC (“FCPT GP”), is its sole general partner.
FCPT was incorporated as a Maryland corporation on July 2, 2015 as a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Darden Restaurants, Inc., (together with its consolidated subsidiaries “Darden”), for the purpose of owning, acquiring and leasing properties on a triple-net basis, for use in the restaurant and related food service industries. On November 9, 2015, Darden completed a spin-off of FCPT whereby Darden contributed to us
100%
of the equity interest in entities that own
418
properties (the “Properties” or “Property”) in which Darden operates restaurants, representing
five
of their brands, and
six
LongHorn Steakhouse® restaurants located in the San Antonio, Texas area (the “Kerrow Restaurant Operating Business”) along with the underlying properties or interests therein associated with the Kerrow Restaurant Operating Business. In exchange, we issued to Darden all of our common stock and paid to Darden
$315.0 million
in cash. Subsequently, Darden distributed all of our outstanding shares of common stock pro rata to holders of Darden common stock whereby each Darden shareholder received one share of our common stock for every
three
shares of Darden common stock held at the close of business on the record date as well as cash in lieu of any fractional shares of our common stock which they would have otherwise received (the “Spin-Off”). The Spin-Off is intended to qualify as tax-free to Darden shareholders for U. S. federal income tax purposes, except for cash paid in lieu of fractional shares.
We believe that we have been organized and have operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2016, and we intend to continue to operate in a manner that will enable us to maintain our qualification as a REIT. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our adjusted taxable income to our shareholders, subject to certain adjustments and excluding any net capital gain. As a REIT, we will not be subject to federal corporate income tax on that portion of net income that is distributed to our shareholders. However, FCPT’s taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) will generally be subject to federal, state, and local income taxes. We will make our REIT election upon the filing of our 2016 tax return.
Any references to “the Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to FCPT as an independent, publicly traded, self-administered company.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
Th
e accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. These adjustments are considered to be of a normal, recurring nature.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts previously reported under specific financial statement captions have been reclassified to be consistent with the current period presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting period. The estimates and assumptions used in the
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
accompanying consolidated financial statements are based on management’s evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances as of the date of the combination. Actual results may differ from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing the accompanying financial statements, and such differences could be material.
Real Estate Investments, Net
Real estate investments, net are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Building components are depreciated over estimated useful lives ranging from
seven
to
fifty-four
years using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements, which are reflected on our balance sheets as a component of buildings, equipment and improvements are amortized over the lesser of the non-cancelable lease term or the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method. Other equipment is depreciated over estimated useful lives ranging from
two
to
fifteen
years also using the straight-line method. Real estate development and construction costs for newly constructed restaurants are capitalized in the period in which they are incurred. Gains and losses on the disposal of land, buildings and equipment are included in our accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Our accounting policies regarding land, buildings and equipment, including leasehold improvements, include our judgments regarding the estimated useful lives of these assets, the residual values to which the assets are depreciated or amortized, the determination of what constitutes a reasonably assured lease term, and the determination as to what constitutes enhancing the value of or increasing the life of existing assets. These judgments and estimates may produce materially different amounts of reported depreciation and amortization expense if different assumptions were used. As discussed further below, these judgments may also impact our need to recognize an impairment charge on the carrying amount of these assets as the cash flows associated with the assets are realized, or as our expectations of estimated future cash flows change.
Acquisition of Real Estate
The Company evaluated the acquisitions and concluded that the land, building, site improvements, and in-places leases (if any) were a single asset. The building and property improvements are attached to the land and cannot be physically removed and used separately from the land without incurring significant costs or reducing their fair value. As substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired are concentrated in a single identifiable asset, the acquisitions do not qualify as a business and are accounted for as asset acquisitions. Related transaction costs are generally capitalized and amortized over the useful life of the acquired assets.
The Company allocates the purchase price (including acquisition and closing costs) of real estate acquisitions to land, building, and site improvements based on their relative fair values. In making estimates of fair values for this purpose, the Company uses a third-party specialist that obtains various information about each property, including the pre-acquisition due diligence and leasing activities of the Company.
Lease Intangibles
Lease intangibles, if any, acquired in conjunction with the purchase of real estate represent the value of in-place leases and above- or below-market leases. For real estate acquired subject to existing lease agreements, in-place lease intangibles are valued based on the Company’s estimates of costs related to tenant acquisition and the carrying costs that would be incurred during the time it would take to locate a tenant if the property were vacant, considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases at the time of the acquisition. Above- and below-market lease intangibles are recorded based on the present value of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the leases at the time of acquisition of the real estate and the Company’s estimate of current market lease rates for the property, measured over a period equal to the remaining initial term of the lease.
In-place lease intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining initial term of the related lease and included in depreciation and amortization expense. Above-market lease intangibles are amortized over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases as a decrease in rental revenue. Below market lease intangibles are generally amortized as an increase to rental revenue over the remaining initial term of the respective leases, including renewal options. Should a lease terminate early, the unamortized portion of any related lease intangible is immediately recognized in impairment loss in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Land, buildings and equipment and certain other assets, including definite-lived intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to the future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. Identifiable cash flows are measured at the lowest level for which they are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities, generally at the restaurant level. If these assets are determined to be impaired, the amount of impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value. Fair value is generally determined by appraisals or sales prices of comparable assets.
The judgments we make related to the expected useful lives of long-lived assets and our ability to realize undiscounted cash flows in excess of the carrying amounts of these assets are affected by factors such as the ongoing maintenance and improvements of the assets, changes in economic conditions, changes in usage or operating performance, desirability of the restaurant sites and other factors, such as our ability to sell our assets held for sale. As we assess the ongoing expected cash flows and carrying amounts of our long-lived assets, significant adverse changes in these factors could cause us to realize a material impairment loss.
Real Estate Held for Sale
Real estate is classified as held for sale when the sale is probable, will be completed within one year, purchase agreements are executed, the buyer has a significant deposit at risk, and no financing contingencies exist which could prevent the transaction from being completed in a timely manner. R
estaurant sites and certain other assets to be disposed of are included in assets held for sale when the likelihood of disposing of these assets within one year is probable. Assets whose disposal is not probable within
one
year remain in land, buildings, equipment and improvements until their disposal within one year is probable. Disposals of assets that have a major effect on our operations and financial results or that represent a strategic shift in our operating businesses meet the requirements to be reported as discontinued operations.
Real estate held-for-sale is
reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less estimated costs to sell.
In the second quarter of 2017, the Company also
expects to sell
one
property leased to Darden for
$5.2 million
. The potential sale is from an unsolicited offer and would result in a gain of
$3.5 million
.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents can consist of cash and money market accounts.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
We enter into derivative instruments for risk management purposes only, including derivatives designated as hedging instruments as required by
Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and those utilized as economic hedges. Our use of derivative instruments is currently limited to interest rate hedges. These instruments are generally structured as hedges of the variability of cash flows related to forecasted transactions (cash flow hedges). We do not enter into derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes, where changes in the cash flows of the derivative are not expected to offset changes in cash flows of the hedged item. All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. For those derivative instruments for which we intend to elect hedge accounting, at the time the derivative contract is entered into, we document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet or to specific forecasted transactions. We also formally assess, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of hedged items.
To the extent our derivatives are effective in offsetting the variability of the hedged cash flows, and otherwise meet the cash flow hedge accounting criteria in accordance with GAAP, changes in the derivatives’ fair value are not included in current earnings but are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. These changes in fair value will be reclassified into earnings at the time of the forecasted transaction. Ineffectiveness measured in the hedging relationship is recorded in earnings in the period in which it occurs.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
See Note 7 - Derivative Financial Instruments for additional information.
Other Assets and Liabilities
Other assets primarily consist of prepaid assets, inventories, and accounts receivable. Other liabilities primarily consist of accrued compensation, accrued operating expenses, and deferred rent obligations on certain operating leases.
Notes Payable
Notes payable are carried at their unpaid principal balance, net of deferred financing costs. This long-term debt is unsecured and interest is paid monthly until it is paid in whole or matures at a future date.
Deferred Financing Costs
Financing costs related to long-term debt are deferred and amortized over the remaining life of the debt using the effective interest method. These costs are presented as a direct deduction from their related liabilities on the balance sheets.
Revenue Recognition
Rental income
For those triple-net leases that provide for periodic and determinable increases in base rent, base rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term when collectability is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis generally results in recognized revenues during the first half of a lease term exceeding the cash amounts contractually due from our tenants, creating a straight-line rent receivable. Taxes
collected from lessees and remitted to governmental authorities are presented on a net basis within rental income in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
For those leases that provide for periodic increases in base rent only if certain revenue parameters or other substantive contingencies are met, the increased rental revenue is recognized as the related parameters or contingencies are met, rather than on a straight-line basis over the applicable lease term.
Income from rent, lease termination fees and all other income is recognized when all of the following criteria are met in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 104: (i) the applicable agreement has been fully executed and delivered; (ii) services have been rendered; (iii) the amount is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
We assess the collectability of our lease receivables, including straight-line receivables. We base our assessment of the collectability of rent receivables (other than straight-line rent receivables) on several factors, including payment history, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to recover the full value of the receivable, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate may not be recovered. We also base our assessment of the collectability of straight-line rent receivables on several factors, including among other things, the financial strength of the tenant and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the property, the historical payment pattern of the tenant and the type of property. If our evaluation of these factors indicates it is probable that we will be unable to receive the rent payments due in the future, we provide a reserve against the recognized straight-line rent receivable asset for the portion, up to its full value, that we estimate may not be recovered. If we change our assumptions or estimates regarding the collectability of future rent payments required by a lease, we may adjust our reserve or reduce the rental revenue recognized in the period we make such change in our assumptions or estimates.
Restaurant revenue
Restaurant revenue represents food, beverage, and other products sold and is presented net of the following discounts: coupons, employee meals, complimentary meals and gift cards. Revenue from restaurant sales is recognized when food and beverage products are sold. We recognize sales from our gift cards when the gift card is redeemed by the customer. Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are presented on a net basis within restaurant revenue on our consolidated statements of income.
In the first quarter of 2017, the Company adopted ASU No. 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” which applies to inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out or average cost. Under the updated guidance,
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
an entity should measure inventory that is within scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value, which is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out. Adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
Restaurant Expenses
Restaurant expenses include restaurant labor, general and administrative expenses, and food and beverage costs. Food and beverage costs include inventory, warehousing, related purchasing and distribution costs. Vendor allowances received in connection with the purchase of a vendor’s products are recognized as a reduction of the related food and beverage costs as earned.
Income Taxes
We believe that we have been organized and have operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2016, and we intend to continue to operate in a manner that will enable us to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
So long as we qualify as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our net income that we distribute currently to our shareholders. To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required under the Code to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains) to our shareholders and meet certain other requirements. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Even if we qualify as a REIT, we may also be subject to certain state, local and franchise taxes. Under certain circumstances, U.S. federal income and excise taxes may be due on our undistributed taxable income.
The Kerrow Restaurant Operating Business is a TRS and will continue to be taxed as a C corporation.
We provide for federal and state income taxes currently payable as well as for those deferred because of temporary differences between reporting income and expenses for financial statement purposes versus tax purposes. Federal income tax credits are recorded as a reduction of income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date. Interest recognized on reserves for uncertain tax positions is included in interest, net in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income. A corresponding liability for accrued interest is included as a component of other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Penalties, when incurred, are recognized in general and administrative expenses.
We estimate certain components of our provision for income taxes. These estimates include, among other items, depreciation and amortization expense allowable for tax purposes, allowable tax credits for items such as taxes paid on reported employee tip income, effective rates for state and local income taxes and the valuation and tax deductibility of certain other items. We adjust our annual effective income tax rate as additional information on outcomes or events becomes available.
We base our estimates on the best available information at the time that we prepare the provision. We will generally file our annual income tax returns several months after our year end. Income tax returns are subject to audit by state and local governments, generally years after the returns are filed. These returns could be subject to material adjustments or differing interpretations of the tax laws. The major jurisdictions in which we will file income tax returns are the U.S. federal jurisdiction and all states in the U.S. in which we own properties that have an income tax.
Tax accounting guidance requires that a position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return be recognized (or derecognized) in the financial statements when it is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. A recognized tax position is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
We include within our current tax provision the balance of unrecognized tax benefits related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts could change during the next 12 months based on the outcome of examinations.
See Note 8 - Income Taxes for additional information.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed by dividing net income allocated to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
No effect is shown for any securities that are anti-dilutive.
Net income allocated to common shareholders represents net income less income allocated to participating securities. At March 31, 2017, none of the Company’s equity awards qualified as participating securities.
See Note 9 - Equity for additional information.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company’s stock-based compensation plan provides for the grant of restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), deferred stock units (“DSUs”), performance-based awards (including performance stock units (“PSUs”)), forfeitable dividend equivalent units (“DEUs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and other types of awards to eligible participants. DEUs are earned during the vesting period and received upon vesting of award. Upon forfeiture of an award, DEUs earned during the vesting period are also forfeited. We classify stock-based payment awards either as equity awards or liability awards based upon cash settlement options. Equity classified awards are measured based on the fair value on the date of grant. Liability classified awards are remeasured to fair value each reporting period. We recognize costs resulting from the Company’s stock-based compensation awards on a straight-line basis over their vesting periods, which range between
one
and
five
years, less estimated forfeitures. No compensation cost is recognized for awards for which employees do not render the requisite services.
In the first quarter of 2017, the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which amends how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees. The new guidance required all income tax effects of awards to be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. It also allowed an employer to repurchase more of an employee’s shares than it can today for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting and to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. The Company’s adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
See Note 10 - Stock-Based Compensation for additional information.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We use a fair value approach to value certain assets and liabilities. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. We use a fair value hierarchy, which distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and an entity's own assumptions (unobservable inputs). The hierarchy consists of three levels:
|
|
•
|
Level 1 - Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
|
|
|
•
|
Level 2 - Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
|
|
|
•
|
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.
|
Application of New Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. The standard outlines a single comprehensive revenue recognition model for entities to follow in accounting for revenue from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the revenue model is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. On July 9, 2015, the FASB decided to delay the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for one year. The standard is now effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption for annual periods beginning after
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods is permitted. We do not expect adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”, which supersedes the existing guidance for lease accounting, Leases (Topic 840). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize leases on their balance sheets, and leaves lessor accounting largely unchanged. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted for all entities. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to elect to use certain transition relief. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments." ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on certain specific cash flow issues, including, but not limited to, debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination and distributions received from equity method investees. ASU 2016-15 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted and shall be applied retrospectively where practicable. We do not expect adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
NOTE 3 – CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
Our tenant base and the restaurant brands operating our properties are highly concentrated. With respect to our tenant base, Darden leases represent approximately
93%
of the scheduled base rents from the properties we own. As our revenues predominately consist of rental payments, we are dependent on Darden for substantially all of our leasing revenues. The audited financial statements for Darden can be found in the Investor Relations section at www.darden.com. We are providing this website address solely for the information of our stockholders. We do not intend this website to be an active link or to otherwise incorporate the information contained on such website into this report or other filings with the SEC.
We also are subject to concentration risk in terms of the restaurant brands that operate our properties. With
299
locations in our portfolio, Olive Garden branded restaurants comprise approximately
62%
of our leased properties and approximately
69%
of the revenues received under leases. Our properties, including our Kerrow restaurants, are located in
44
states, with concentrations of
10%
or greater of total rental revenue in
two
states: Florida (
12%
) and Texas (
11%
).
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents. We are exposed to credit risk with respect to cash held at various financial institutions, access to our credit facility, and amounts due or payable under our derivative contracts. At March 31, 2017,
our exposure to risk related to our derivative instruments totaled
$2.1 million
and the counterparty to such instruments is an investment grade financial institution.
Our credit risk exposure with regard to our cash and the
$305 million
available capacity under the revolver portion of our credit facility is spread among a diversified group of investment grade financial institutions.
NOTE 4 – REAL ESTATE INVESMENTS, NET
Real Estate Investments, Net
Real estate investments, net, which consist of land, buildings and improvements leased to others subject to triple-net operating leases and those utilized in the operations of Kerrow Restaurant Operating Business are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Land
|
|
$
|
425,401
|
|
|
$
|
421,941
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
926,560
|
|
|
916,444
|
|
Equipment
|
|
138,652
|
|
|
139,180
|
|
Total gross real estate investments
|
|
1,490,613
|
|
|
1,477,565
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
(586,486
|
)
|
|
(583,307
|
)
|
Total Real Estate Investments, Net
|
|
$
|
904,127
|
|
|
$
|
894,258
|
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company invested
$17.5 million
, including transaction costs, in
nine
restaurant properties located in
six
states, and allocated the investment as follows:
$4.2 million
to land,
$12.6 million
to buildings and improvements, and
$0.7 million
to intangible assets related to leases. There was
no
contingent consideration associated with these acquisitions.
These properties are 100% occupied under triple-net leases, with a weighted average lease term of
13.5 years
. The Company accounted for these transactions as asset acquisitions in accordance with GAAP.
Operating Leases
The following table presents the scheduled minimum future contractual rent to be received under the remaining non-cancelable term of the operating leases.
Because lease renewal periods are exercisable at the option of the lessee, the table presents future minimum lease payments due during the initial lease term only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
2017 (nine months)
|
|
$
|
76,630
|
|
2018
|
|
103,450
|
|
2019
|
|
104,951
|
|
2020
|
|
106,448
|
|
2021
|
|
107,901
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
1,016,821
|
|
Total Future Minimum Lease Payments
|
|
$
|
1,516,201
|
|
NOTE 5 – SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL FOR CERTAIN COMPONENTS OF CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
Other Assets
The components of other assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Intangible lease assets
|
|
$
|
2,381
|
|
|
$
|
1,772
|
|
Prepaid acquisition costs
|
|
155
|
|
|
438
|
|
Prepaid assets
|
|
576
|
|
|
614
|
|
Inventories
|
|
178
|
|
|
202
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
241
|
|
|
162
|
|
Other
|
|
423
|
|
|
631
|
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
$
|
3,954
|
|
|
$
|
3,819
|
|
Lease Intangibles, Net
The following table details lease intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, which are included in Other Assets on our consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
In-place leases
|
|
$
|
2,498
|
|
|
$
|
1,809
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Intangible Lease Assets, Net
|
|
$
|
2,381
|
|
|
$
|
1,772
|
|
The value of in-place leases amortized and included in depreciation and amortization expense was
$80 thousand
for the three months ended March 31, 2017. There was
no
amortization expense for intangible lease assets for the three months ended March 31, 2016. There were no above or below market intangible assets or liabilities at March 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.
Based on the balance of intangible assets at March 31, 2017, the net aggregate amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter is expected to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
2017 (nine months)
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
2018
|
|
217
|
|
2019
|
|
217
|
|
2020
|
|
211
|
|
2021
|
|
190
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
1,333
|
|
Total Future Amortization Expense
|
|
$
|
2,381
|
|
Other Liabilities
The components of other liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
952
|
|
|
$
|
726
|
|
Accrued operating expenses
|
|
891
|
|
|
759
|
|
Accrued interest expense
|
|
836
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
Deferred lease liability
|
|
643
|
|
|
634
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
539
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
Other
|
|
514
|
|
|
901
|
|
Total Other Liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,375
|
|
|
$
|
5,450
|
|
NOTE 6 – NOTES PAYABLE
At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, our notes payable consisted of (1) a
$400 million
, non-amortizing term loan and (2)
$45 million
in outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the net unamortized deferred financing costs were
$5.7 million
and
$6.1 million
, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on the term loan before consideration of the interest rate hedge described below was
2.56%
and
2.36%
at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. During both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, amortization of deferred financing costs was
$398 thousand
. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility were
2.70%
and
2.46%
, respectively, and there were no outstanding letters of credit.
On February 14, 2017, FCPT OP, FCPT and certain of its subsidiaries, as guarantors, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto entered into a second amendment (the “Loan Agreement Amendment”) to the
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement (as amended, the "Loan Agreement")
, for the purpose of, among other things, permitting an incurrence of additional unsecured debt in an aggregate principal amount of at least
$50 million
. The Loan Agreement Amendment further provides that, upon the incurrence of such additional unsecured debt, (A) all pledges of equity interests that secure the Loan Agreement, and all subsidiary guarantees of the Loan Agreement, will be released and (B) the financial covenant requirements in relation to maximum leverage and minimum debt service coverage will be adjusted in the manner set forth in the Loan Agreement Amendment. In addition, the Loan Agreement Amendment increases the minimum Consolidated Tangible Net Worth requirement from
$845.7 million
to
$868.9 million
. The Loan Agreement Amendment also contains customary representations and warranties by FCPT OP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTE 7 – DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
We are exposed to certain risks arising from both our business operations and economic conditions. We principally manage our exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of our core business activities. We manage economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of our debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, we enter into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in our receipt or payment of future cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. Our derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of our known or expected cash payments principally related to our borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
Our objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage our exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish these objectives, we primarily use interest rate swaps as part of our interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded on our consolidated balance sheet in accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings.
For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded approximately
$4 thousand
of income and
$348 thousand
of expense, respectively, of hedge ineffectiveness in earnings attributable to
zero-percent
floor and rounding mismatches in the hedging relationships.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on our variable-rate debt. We estimate that over the next twelve months an additional
$703 thousand
will be reclassified to earnings as an increase to interest expense.
Non-designated Hedges
We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we did not have any derivatives that were not designated as hedges.
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value at
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value at
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
$
|
2,070
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,070
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statements of Comprehensive Income
The table below presents the effect of our interest rate swaps on the statements of comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amounts Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
|
Three months ended March 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(625
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
Three months ended March 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
(7,444
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(985
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(348
|
)
|
Tabular Disclosure Offsetting Derivatives
The table below presents a gross presentation, the effects of offsetting, and a net presentation of our derivatives at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The net amounts of derivative assets or liabilities can be reconciled to the tabular disclosure of fair value. The tabular disclosure of fair value provides the location that derivative assets and liabilities are presented on the consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offsetting of Derivative Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets
|
|
Gross Amounts Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
Net Amounts of Assets Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Instruments
|
|
Cash Collateral Received
|
|
Net Amount
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
2,070
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,070
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,070
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
837
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
837
|
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The agreement with our derivative counterparty provides that if we default on any of our indebtedness, including default for which repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then we could also be declared in default on our derivative obligations.
At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of derivatives in a net asset position related to these agreements was approximately
$2.1 million
and
$837 thousand
, respectively. As of March 31, 2017, we have not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If we or our counterparty had breached any of these provisions at March 31, 2017, we would have received the termination value of
$2.1 million
.
NOTE 8 – INCOME TAXES
We believe that we have been organized and have operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2016, and we intend to continue to operate in a manner that will enable us to maintain our qualification as a REIT. So long as we qualify as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our net income that we distribute currently to our stockholders. Accordingly, no provision for federal income
taxes has been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2017 related to the REIT. However, FCPT’s TRSs will generally be subject to federal, state, and local income taxes.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, our income tax provision (benefit) was
$45 thousand
and (
$80,556 thousand
), respectively. The income tax benefit recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2016 was principally the result of
the reversal of deferred tax liabilities associated with activities no longer expected to be subject to federal taxation as a result of our intention to elect to be taxed as a REIT commencing with the year ended December 31, 2016.
NOTE 9 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock
At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company was authorized to issue
25,000,000
shares,
$0.0001
par value per share of preferred stock. There were
no
shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.
Common Stock
At March 31, 2017, the Company was authorized to issue
500,000,000
shares,
$0.0001
par value per share, of common stock.
In March 2017, we declared a dividend of
$0.2425
per share, which was paid in April 2017 to common stockholders of record as of March 31, 2017.
At March 31, 2017, there were
60,022,912
shares of the Company's common stock issued and outstanding.
Common Stock Issuance Under the At-The-Market Program
In December 2016, the Company established an “At-the-Market” (“ATM”) equity issuance program under which the Company may, at its discretion, issue and sell its common stock with a sales value of up to a maximum of
$150.0 million
through ATM offerings on the New York Stock Exchange through broker-dealers. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we sold
49,900
shares under the ATM program at a weighted-average selling price of
$20.04
per share, for net proceeds of approximately
$985 thousand
(after issuance costs). At March 31, 2017 there was
$148.4 million
available for issuance under the ATM program.
Noncontrolling Interest
At March 31, 2017, there were
449,320
OP units outstanding held by third parties. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, FCPT OP issued
174,576
OP units as partial consideration for the acquisitions of
four
properties. Generally, common OP Units participate in net income allocations and distributions and entitle their holder the right, subject to the terms set forth in the partnership agreement, to require the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a portion of the Common OP Units held by such limited partner. At the Company’s option, it may satisfy this redemption with cash or by exchanging non-registered shares of FCPT common stock on a one-for-one basis. Prior to the redemption of units, the limited partners participate in net income allocations and distributions.
At March 31, 2017, FCPT is the owner of approximately
99.25%
of FCPT’s OP units. The remaining
0.75%
, or
449,320
, of FCPT’s OP units are held by unaffiliated limited partners. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, FCPT OP distributed
$38 thousand
to limited partners.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Earnings Per Share
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net earnings per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
(In thousands except for per share data)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Average common shares outstanding – basic
|
|
59,929
|
|
|
48,375
|
|
Net effect of dilutive equity awards
|
|
67
|
|
|
36
|
|
Net effect of shares issued with respect to Pre-Spin Dividend
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,326
|
|
Average common shares outstanding – diluted
|
|
59,996
|
|
|
58,737
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,633
|
|
|
$
|
94,283
|
|
Basic net earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
Diluted net earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016,
the number of outstanding equity awards that were anti-dilutive totaled
240,120
and
139,571
, respectively.
Income allocated to noncontrolling interests of the Operating Partnership has been excluded from the numerator and exchangeable Operating Partnership units have been omitted from the denominator for the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share since the effect of including these amounts in the numerator and denominator would have no impact. Weighted average exchangeable Operating Partnership units outstanding for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 were
427,983
.
NOTE 10 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
On October 20, 2015, the Board of Directors of FCPT adopted, and FCPT’s sole stockholder at such time, Rare Hospitality International, Inc., approved, the Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan provides for the grant of awards of nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, unrestricted stock, dividend equivalent rights, performance shares and other performance-based awards, other equity-based awards, and cash bonus awards to eligible participants. Subject to adjustment, the maximum number of shares of stock reserved for issuance under the Plan is equal to
2,100,000
shares.
At March 31, 2017,
1,794,654
shares of common stock were available for award under the Plan. The unamortized compensation cost of awards issued under the Incentive Plan totaled
$5.8 million
at March 31, 2017 as shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
Restricted Stock Awards
|
|
Performance Stock Awards
|
|
Total
|
Unrecognized compensation cost at January 1, 2017
|
|
$
|
1,094
|
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
|
$
|
1,402
|
|
|
$
|
3,121
|
|
Equity grants
|
|
—
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
2,264
|
|
|
3,225
|
|
Equity grant forfeitures
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Equity compensation expense
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
(501
|
)
|
Unrecognized Compensation Cost at March 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
929
|
|
|
$
|
1,483
|
|
|
$
|
3,433
|
|
|
$
|
5,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2017, the weighted average amortization period remaining for all of our equity awards was
2.1
years.
RSUs
RSUs have been granted at a value equal to the
five
-day average closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant and will be settled in stock at the end of their vesting periods, which range between
one
and
three
years, at the then market price of our common stock.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
At March 31, 2017 there were
63,264
RSUs outstanding, and
7,096
had vested and were distributed. There were
no
RSUs granted during the three months ended March 31, 2017 or 2016. There were
no
RSUs forfeited during the three months ended March 31, 2017. Unvested RSUs at March 31, 2017 will vest at varying times through 2019.
Restricted Stock Awards
During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, there were
44,657
and
51,209
shares of restricted stock as well as dividend equivalent rights granted under the Plan, respectively. There were
no
RSAs forfeited during the three months ended March 31, 2017. These shares generally vest over a
three
-year service period.
Unvested restricted stock awards at March 31, 2017 will vest at varying times through 2019.
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards
During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, there were
63,538
and
68,468
performance shares as well as dividend equivalent rights granted under the Plan, respectively. The performance period of the grants run from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019 and January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018, respectively. Pursuant to the performance share award agreement, each participant is eligible to vest in and receive shares of the Company's common stock based on the initial target number of shares granted multiplied by a percentage range between
0%
and
200%
. The percentage range is based on the attainment of a total shareholder return of the Company compared to certain specified peer groups of companies during the performance period.
The fair value of the performance shares was estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo Simulation model. B
ased on the grant date fair value, the Company expects to recognize
$3.4 million
in compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period associated with these market-based grants.
NOTE 11 –FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The carrying amounts of certain of the Company’s financial instruments including cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due either to length of maturity or interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates. The carrying value of derivative financial instruments equal fair value in accordance with GAAP.
Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. We evaluate hierarchy disclosures each reporting period. The following table presents the assets and liabilities recorded that are reported at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,070
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments
Currently, we use interest rate swaps to manage our interest rate risk associated with our notes payable.
The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.
The fair values of interest rate options are determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities.
To comply with the provisions of ASC 820, we incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.
Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by ourselves and our counterparties. We have determined that the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments made to our derivative contracts, which determination was based on the fair value of each individual contract, was not significant to the overall valuation. As a result, all of our derivatives held at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of certain financial liabilities that are recorded on our consolidated balance sheets.
Fair Value of Certain Financial Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable, excluding deferred financing costs
|
|
$
|
445,000
|
|
|
$
|
445,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable, excluding deferred financing costs
|
|
$
|
445,000
|
|
|
$
|
445,309
|
|
The fair value of the note payable (Level 2) is determined using the present value of the contractual cash flows, discounted at the current market cost of debt.
NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Rentals
The annual future lease commitments under non-cancelable operating leases for each of the five years subsequent to March 31, 2017 and thereafter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
March 31, 2017
|
2017 (nine months)
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
2018
|
|
518
|
|
2019
|
|
407
|
|
2020
|
|
280
|
|
2021
|
|
97
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
—
|
|
Total Future Lease Commitments
|
|
$
|
1,688
|
|
Rental expense was
$158 thousand
and
$150 thousand
for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Litigation
We are subject to private lawsuits, administrative proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business from time to time. A number of these lawsuits, proceedings and claims may exist at any given time. These matters typically involve claims from guests, employee wage and hour claims and others related to operational issues common to the restaurant industry. We record our best estimate of a loss when the loss is considered probable. When a liability is probable and there is a range of estimated loss with no best estimate in the range, we record the minimum estimated liability related to the lawsuits, proceedings or claims. While the resolution of a lawsuit, proceeding or claim may have an impact on our financial results for the period in which it is resolved, we believe that the maximum liability related to probable lawsuits, proceedings and claims in which we are currently involved, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
NOTE 13 – SEGMENTS
During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we operated in
two
segments: real estate operations and restaurant operations. Our segments are based on our organizational and management structure, which aligns with how our results are monitored and performance is assessed. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following tables present financial information by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Real Estate Operations
|
|
Restaurant Operations
|
|
Intercompany
|
|
Total
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
27,764
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
27,764
|
|
Intercompany rental income
|
|
99
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Restaurant revenues
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,943
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,943
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
27,863
|
|
|
4,943
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
32,707
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
2,863
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,863
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
5,253
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
Restaurant expenses
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,767
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
4,668
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
4,094
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,094
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
12,210
|
|
|
4,923
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
17,034
|
|
Other income
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
15,658
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
15,678
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
—
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
15,658
|
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
15,633
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Real Estate Operations
|
|
Restaurant Operations
|
|
Intercompany
|
|
Total
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
26,192
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
26,192
|
|
Intercompany rental income
|
|
97
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Restaurant revenues
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
26,289
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
31,051
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
3,317
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,317
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
5,023
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,187
|
|
Restaurant expenses
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
4,698
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
4,182
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,182
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
12,522
|
|
|
4,959
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
17,384
|
|
Other income
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
13,827
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
13,727
|
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
80,409
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
80,556
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
94,236
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
94,283
|
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table presents supplemental information by segment at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
March 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Real Estate Operations
|
|
Restaurant Operations
|
|
Total
|
Gross real estate investments
|
|
$
|
1,473,992
|
|
|
$
|
16,621
|
|
|
$
|
1,490,613
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
(580,416
|
)
|
|
(6,070
|
)
|
|
(586,486
|
)
|
Total real estate investments, net
|
|
$
|
893,576
|
|
|
$
|
10,551
|
|
|
$
|
904,127
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
15,281
|
|
|
$
|
2,789
|
|
|
$
|
18,070
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
930,014
|
|
|
$
|
13,884
|
|
|
$
|
943,898
|
|
Notes payable, net of deferred financing costs
|
|
$
|
439,293
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
439,293
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Real Estate Operations
|
|
Restaurant Operations
|
|
Total
|
Gross real estate investments
|
|
$
|
1,460,967
|
|
|
$
|
16,598
|
|
|
$
|
1,477,565
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
(577,392
|
)
|
|
(5,915
|
)
|
|
(583,307
|
)
|
Total real estate investments, net
|
|
$
|
883,575
|
|
|
$
|
10,683
|
|
|
$
|
894,258
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
24,412
|
|
|
$
|
2,231
|
|
|
$
|
26,643
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
923,747
|
|
|
$
|
13,404
|
|
|
$
|
937,151
|
|
Notes payable, net of deferred financing costs
|
|
$
|
438,895
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
438,895
|
|
NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company reviewed its subsequent events and transactions that have occurred after March 31, 2017, the date of the consolidated balance
sheet. In the second quarter of 2017 through May 4, 2017, the Company borrowed an additional
$36 million
on the revolving credit facility.
The Company also invested
$35.1 million
in acquisitions of
sixteen
restaurant properties located in
eight
states. These properties are 100% occupied under triple-net leases with a weighted average lease term of
20.0
years. The Company funded the acquisitions with cash on hand and funds borrowed under the revolving credit facility. The Company anticipates accounting for these acquisitions as asset acquisitions in accordance with GAAP. There were no contingent liabilities associated with these transactions at March 31, 2017.
The Company announced on April 20, 2017 that it has entered into an agreement pursuant to which FCPT OP will issue
$125.0 million
of senior, unsecured, fixed rate notes (the “Notes”) that are guaranteed by the Company. The Notes consist of
$50.0 million
of Notes with a
seven
-year term priced at a fixed interest rate of
4.68%
, and
$75.0 million
of Notes with a
ten
-year term priced at a fixed interest rate of
4.93%
, resulting in a weighted average maturity of
8.8 years
and a weighted average fixed interest rate of
4.83%
. The closing and funding of the Notes is expected to occur on June 7, 2017, subject to the satisfaction of standard closing conditions. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the offering to reduce amounts outstanding under its unsecured credit facility, to fund any future acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
There were no other reportable subsequent events or transactions.