UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed
by the Registrant /x/
|
Filed
by a Party other than the Registrant / /
|
Check
the appropriate box:
|
/ /
|
|
Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
/ /
|
|
Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
/x/
|
|
Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
/ /
|
|
Definitive
Additional Materials
|
/ /
|
|
Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section §240.14a-12
|
|
|
SOCKET
MOBILE, INC.
|
(Name
of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
/x/
|
|
No
fee required.
|
/ /
|
|
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
N/A
|
|
|
2)
|
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
N/A
|
|
|
3)
|
|
Per unit
price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated
and state how it was determined):
N/A
|
|
|
4)
|
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
N/A
|
|
|
5)
|
|
Total
fee paid:
N/A
|
/ /
|
|
Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
/ /
|
|
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.
Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form
or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
Amount
Previously Paid:
N/A
|
|
|
2)
|
|
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
N/A
|
|
|
3)
|
|
Filing
Party:
N/A
|
|
|
4)
|
|
Date Filed:
N/A
|
SOCKET
MOBILE, INC.
NOTICE
OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To
Be Held June 14, 2017
Dear
Stockholders:
You
are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Socket Mobile, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
to be held Wednesday, June 14, 2017 at 10:30 a.m., local time, at the Company's headquarters at 39700 Eureka Drive, Newark, California
94560 for the following purposes:
(1) To
elect six directors to serve until their respective successors are elected;
(2) Advisory
vote on executive compensation policies and practices as described in the annual meeting proxy.
(3)
Proposal to ratify the appointment of Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC as independent registered public accountants of the Company
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.
(4) To
transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
The
foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this notice. Only stockholders of record
at the close of business on April 17, 2017 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. All stockholders are cordially
invited to attend the meeting in person. However, to ensure your representation at the meeting, you are urged to mark, sign, date,
and return the enclosed Proxy as promptly as possible following the instructions on your proxy ballot. Any stockholder attending
the meeting may vote in person even if he or she has returned a Proxy.
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newark,
California
|
|
Kevin
J. Mills
|
April 21, 2017
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
YOUR
VOTE IS IMPORTANT.
IN
ORDER TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING,
YOU ARE REQUESTED TO COMPLETE, SIGN AND DATE THE ENCLOSED PROXY
AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE, OR VOTE BY PHONE OR BY INTERNET WHERE AVAILABLE.
SOCKET
MOBILE, INC.
PROXY
STATEMENT FOR
2017
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
INFORMATION
CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
GENERAL
The
enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Socket Mobile, Inc. (the "Company"), for use at the
2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held Wednesday June 14, 2017 at 10:30 a.m., local time, or at any adjournment thereof,
for the purposes set forth herein and in the accompanying Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The 2017 Annual Meeting
will be held at the Company's headquarters at 39700 Eureka Drive, Newark, California 94560. The Company's telephone number at
that location is (510) 933-3000.
Notice
of the availability of these proxy solicitation materials and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016,
including financial statements, were first mailed on or about May 1, 2017 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the 2017 Annual
Meeting.
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
The
proxy materials are available at http://www.socketmobile.com/about-us/investor-relations/stockholder-meeting-information
.
Stockholders may access the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Card at this site
to read, download the documents, and/or request a printed copy. Printed copies may also be requested by telephone at
800-856-9390
.
Printed copies will be mailed within 3 business days of receipt of the request.
RECORD
DATE AND PRINCIPAL SHARE OWNERSHIP
Holders
of record of our Common Stock at the close of business on April 17, 2017 (the "Record Date") are entitled to notice
of and to vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting. At the Record Date, 5,959,915 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding. Each
share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote. The Company has no other class of voting securities outstanding and entitled to
be voted at the meeting.
The
only persons known by the Company to beneficially own more than five percent of the Company's Common Stock as of the Record Date
were Charlie Bass, the Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors, Kevin J. Mills, the President, Chief Executive Officer
and a director of the Company, and Roy L. Rogers as trustee for the Rogers Family Trust UTD 01-21-81 and the Roy and Ruth Rogers
Unitrust, UTD 09-28-89. Please see "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" for more information
on these holdings.
REVOCABILITY
OF PROXIES
Any
proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before its use by delivering to the
Secretary of the Company a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the 2017
Annual Meeting and voting in person.
VOTING
AND SOLICITATION
Generally
each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held on all matters to be voted on by the stockholders.
If, however, any stockholder at the 2017 Annual Meeting gives notice of his or her intention to cumulate votes with respect to
the election of directors (Proposal One), then each stockholder may cumulate such stockholder's votes for the election of directors
and give one candidate a number of votes equal to the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the number of shares of
Common Stock that such stockholder is entitled to vote, or may distribute such stockholder's votes on the same principle among
as many candidates as the stockholder may select, provided that votes cannot be cast for more than seven candidates. However,
no stockholder shall be entitled to cumulate votes for a candidate unless the candidate's name has been placed in nomination prior
to the voting and the stockholder, or any other stockholder, has given notice at the meeting, prior to the voting, of the intention
to cumulate votes. On all other matters, stockholders may not cumulate votes.
This
solicitation of proxies is made by the Company, and all related costs will be borne by the Company. In addition, the Company may
reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of stock for their expenses in forwarding solicitation
material to such beneficial owners. Proxies may also be solicited by the Company's directors, officers and regular employees,
without additional compensation, personally or by telephone, email or facsimile.
QUORUM;
VOTE REQUIRED; ABSTENTIONS; BROKER NON-VOTES
The
presence at the 2017 Annual Meeting, either in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of votes entitled to be cast with
respect to the outstanding shares of Common Stock shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Shares that are voted
"FOR," "AGAINST," "WITHHOLD or “ABSTAIN” on a subject matter (the "Votes Cast")
are treated as being present at the meeting for purpose of establishing a quorum entitled to vote on the matter.
Proposal One.
Directors
are elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to
vote on the election of directors. If a quorum is present at the meeting, the six nominees receiving the highest number of votes
will be elected to the Board of Directors. Votes withheld from any nominee are counted for purposes of determining the presence
or absence of a quorum.
Proposal
Two
. To approve the executive compensation policies and practices of the Company as described in this Proxy Statement. The
vote is a non-binding advisory vote to be considered by management and the Board of Directors.
Proposal
Three.
To approve ratification of the appointment of Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC, as the Company's independent registered
public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. Approval requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Votes
Cast on the matter at the 2017 Annual Meeting.
The
Company also intends to count abstentions for purposes of determining (i) the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction
of business and (ii) the total number of Votes Cast with respect to a proposal (other than the election of directors and proposal
two which is advisory in nature). Thus, abstentions for proposal three will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
Broker
non-votes will be counted for purpose of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business, but
will not be counted for purpose of determining the number of Votes Cast with respect to a particular proposal. Thus, a broker
non-vote will not have any effect on the outcome of the voting on Proposal three which requires the affirmative vote of a majority
of the Votes Cast.
A
plurality of the votes duly cast is required for the election of directors. Thus, neither abstentions nor broker non-votes affect
the election of directors, as only affirmative votes will affect the outcome of the election. The advisory vote on proposal two
on executive compensation policies and procedures will only consider votes for and against, thus neither abstentions nor broker
non-votes affect the results.
DEADLINE
FOR RECEIPT OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S PROXY MATERIALS
The
Company currently intends to hold its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders in May 2018 and to mail proxy statements relating to
such meeting in April 2018. Proposals of stockholders of the Company that are intended to be presented by such stockholders at
the 2018 Annual Meeting must be received by the Company no later than November 15, 2017, and must otherwise be in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, in order to be considered for inclusion in the Company's proxy statement and proxy card relating
to that meeting. In addition, stockholders must comply with the procedural requirements in the Company's bylaws. Under the Company's
bylaws, notice of any stockholder nomination to the board or proposal of business must be delivered to or mailed and received
by the Secretary of the Company not less than ninety (90) days prior to the meeting; provided, however, that in the event that
less than one-hundred (100) days notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders,
notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the
day on which such notice of the date of the meeting is mailed or such public disclosure is made. To be in proper form, a stockholder's
notice to the Secretary shall set forth: (i) the name and address of the stockholder who intends to make the nominations or propose
the business and, as the case may be, of the person or persons to be nominated or of the business to be proposed; (ii) representations
that the stockholder is a holder of record of stock of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting and, as applicable, that such
stockholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice or
propose such business; (iii) if applicable, a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and each
nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to
be made by the stockholder; (iv) such other information regarding each nominee or each matter of business to be proposed by such
stockholder as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission had the nominee been nominated, or intended to be nominated, or the matter been proposed, or intended to be proposed
by the Board of Directors; and (v) if applicable, the consent of each nominee to serve as director of the Company if so elected.
The chairman of the meeting shall refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person or the proposal of any business not made
in compliance with the foregoing procedure. Stockholders can obtain a copy of the Company's bylaws from the Company upon request.
The Company's bylaws are also on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
If
a stockholder intends to submit a proposal at the 2018 Annual Meeting, but does not wish to have it included in the proxy statement
and proxy for that meeting, the stockholder must do so no later than January 24, 2018, or else the proxy holders will be allowed
to use their discretionary authority to vote against the proposal when it is raised at the 2018 Annual Meeting.
The
attached proxy card grants the persons named as proxies discretionary authority to vote on any matter raised at the 2017 Annual
Meeting that is not included in this Proxy Statement. The Company has not been notified by any stockholder of his or her intent
to present a stockholder proposal at the 2017 Annual Meeting.
PROPOSAL
ONE
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
The
proxy holders will vote to elect as directors the six nominees named below, unless a proxy card is marked otherwise. The nominees
consist of five current directors and one new director. If a person other than a management nominee is nominated at the 2017 Annual
Meeting, the holders of the proxies may choose to cumulate their votes and allocate them among such nominees of management as
the proxy holders shall determine in their discretion in order to elect as many nominees of management as possible. The six candidates
receiving the highest number of votes will be elected. In the event any nominee is unavailable for election, which is not currently
anticipated, the proxy holders may vote in accordance with their judgment for the election of substitute nominees designated by
the Board of Directors.
All
six directors will be elected for one-year terms expiring at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, subject to the election
and qualification of their successors or their earlier death, resignation or removal. The following table sets forth information
concerning the nominees for director. Information on committee assignments reflects current assignments to be reviewed at the
first meeting of the Board following election. Information on age is as of the record date of April 17, 2017.
Name
of Nominee (4)
|
Age
|
Position(s)
Currently Held With the Company
|
Director
Since
|
Charlie
Bass (1)(2)
|
75
|
Chairman
of the Board
|
1992
|
Kevin
J. Mills
|
56
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
2000
|
David
W. Dunlap
|
74
|
VP
Finance & Administration, CFO, Secretary and Director
|
2014
|
Nelson
C. Chan(2,3)
|
55
|
Director
|
2016
|
Brenton
Earl MacDonald(1,2)
|
51
|
Director
|
2016
|
Bill Parnell
|
61
|
None
|
New
|
________________________________
(1)
Member of the Audit Committee.
(2)
Member of the Nominating Committee.
(3)
Member of the Compensation Committee.
(4)
Committee assignments will be made at the first meeting of the Board following election.
Charlie
Bass
co-founded the Company in March 1992 and has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors from such time to the present.
Dr. Bass served as the Company's Chief Executive Officer from April 1997 to March 2000. Dr. Bass has served as the Trustee
of The Bass Trust since April 1988. Dr. Bass holds a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Hawaii.
Kevin
J. Mills
was appointed the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company in March 2000. He
served as the Company's Chief Operating Officer from September 1998 to March 2000. Mr. Mills joined the Company in September
1993 as Vice President of Operations and has also served as our Vice President of Engineering. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Mills
worked from September 1987 to August 1993 at Logitech, Inc., a computer peripherals company, serving most recently as its Director
of Operations. He holds a B.E. in Electronic Engineering with honors from the University of Limerick, Ireland.
David
W. Dunlap
has served as the Company's Vice President of Finance and Administration, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer
since February 1995 and a director of the Company since May 2014. Mr. Dunlap previously served as Vice President of Finance
and Administration and Chief Financial Officer at several public and private companies. He is a certified public accountant (inactive),
and holds an M.B.A. and a B.A. in Business Administration from the University of California at Berkeley.
Nelson
C. Chan
has served as a director of the Company since October 2016. He served as the Chief Executive Officer of Magellan Corporation
from 2006 to 2008, a leader in the consumer, survey, GPS and OEM GPS navigation and positioning markets. From 1992 through 2006
he served in various senior management positions with SanDisk Corporation, a global leader in flash memory cards, the most recent
as Executive Vice President and General Manager, Consumer Business. From 1983 to 1992 Mr. Chan held marketing and engineering
positions at Chips and Technologies, Signetics, and Delco Electronics. Mr. Chan serves as an independent director on several public
companies, including Synaptics, a worldwide developer and supplier of custom-designed human interface solutions; Adesto Technologies,
a developer of innovative, low-power memory solutions; and Decker Brands, a global leader in designing, marketing and distributing
footwear, apparel and accessories. Mr. Chan also serves on the board of directors of several private companies. Within the past
five years, Mr. Chan previously served on the boards of Outerwall Inc. – a provider of automated retail solutions, and Affymetrix
– which developed, manufactured and sold products and services for genetic analysis to the life science research and clinical
healthcare markets. Mr. Chan holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of
California, Santa Barbara and a Master’s degree in Business Administration from Santa Clara University, Santa Clara California.
Brent
MacDonald
has been a director of the Company since June 2016. He leads the Internet of Things (IoT) marketing efforts for
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) CMS division. His 10 plus year tenure at Hewlett Packard Enterprise and HP Inc. covers an array
of strategic planning and business management positions that focus on business growth. Prior to HPE, Mr. MacDonald spent six years
in private equity financing at Newbury Ventures where his focus was on early stage global communication and IT companies throughout
the world, and from 1997 to 2000 he worked for Alcatel-Lucent as a senior business analyst. Mr. MacDonald is a graduate of the
London School of Economics (MSc) and Carleton University (MA).
Bill
Parnell
has been nominated to serve as an independent director. Mr. Parnell was President and CEO of Datalogic ADC from January
2012 thru July 2015 and President and CEO of its predecessors: 1) Datalogic Scanning from March 2006 through December 2011 (initially
known as PSC, Inc. and later including the related operations of Datalogic) and 2) Datalogic Mobile from January 2011 thru December
2011. Datalogic is a supplier of Automatic Data Capture and Industrial Automation products for the retail, manufacturing, transportation
and logistics and healthcare industries. Mr. Parnell holds an MBA from the University of Washington and a Bachelor of Science
Degree in Physics from Utah State University.
Current
Directors who are retiring
Peter
Sealey.
76, is retiring from the Board
.
Dr. Sealey has been a director of the Company since June 2002. Dr. Sealey served
as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Dr. Sealey has served as Chief Executive Officer and founder of The Sausalito
Group, Inc., a management consulting firm, since its founding in July 1997. Dr. Sealey also served from 2007 to 2011
as an Adjunct Professor of Marketing at the Peter F. Drucker Graduate Management School at the Claremont Graduate University in
Claremont, California. He previously served as an Adjunct Professor of Marketing at the Haas School of Business, University of
California at Berkeley from 1996 to 2006. From July 1969 to August 1993, Dr. Sealey served in various senior marketing positions
with the Coca-Cola Company, including as its Senior Vice President, Global Marketing and Chief Marketing Officer from December
1989 to August 1993. Dr. Sealey holds a doctorate from the Peter F. Drucker Graduate Management School at the Claremont Graduate
University.
Charles
C. Emery, Jr., 70,
is retiring from the Board. Dr. Emery has been a director of the Company since April 2010. Dr. Emery served
until his retirement as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey from
1996 through 2006. Since his retirement, Dr. Emery has been active with Arizona State University and the University of Maryland
teaching graduate classes in healthcare information systems, strategic planning, and healthcare finance. He has over 35 years
of experience working within the health insurance and healthcare provider sectors. He is a fellow of the American College of Healthcare
Executives and a fellow of the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives. Dr. Emery holds a doctorate in management
systems from the Peter F. Drucker Graduate Management School at the Claremont Graduate University.
BOARD
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
The
Board of Directors has determined that all of the nominees, except Mr. Mills and Mr. Dunlap, satisfy the definition of "independent
director," as established by Nasdaq listing standards. The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Nominating Committee
and a Compensation Committee. Each committee has adopted a written charter, all of which are available on the Company's web site
at http://www.socketmobile.com/about-us/investor-relations/corporate-governance. The Board of Directors has also determined that
each member of the Audit Committee, the Nominating Committee and the Compensation Committee satisfies the definition of "independent
director," as established by Nasdaq listing standards.
The
Board of Directors held a total of four regular meetings during fiscal 2016, and approved actions on one occasion by unanimous
written consent. The independent directors met separately without management or the management directors after each of the four
regular Board meetings held during 2016. The Company strongly encourages members of the Board of Directors to attend all meetings,
including meetings of committees on which they serve. No director attended fewer than 75 percent of the meetings of the Board
of Directors and the Board committees on which he served.
The
Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Bass (Chairman), Emery and MacDonald. Dr. Emery is retiring from the Board upon the conclusion
of his current term and new director Bill Parnell is expected to join the Audit Committee. The members of the Audit Committee
each qualify as "independent" under the standards established by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
for members of audit committees. The Audit Committee also includes one member, Dr. Bass, who has been determined by the Board
of Directors to meet the qualifications of an "audit committee financial expert" in accordance with Securities and Exchange
Commission rules. Stockholders should understand that this designation is a disclosure required by the Securities and Exchange
Commission relating to Dr. Bass' experience and understanding with respect to certain accounting and auditing matters. This designation
does not impose upon Dr. Bass any duties, obligations or liabilities that are greater than are generally imposed on him as a member
of the Audit Committee, and his designation as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this SEC requirement does not affect
the duties, obligations or liabilities of any other member of the Audit Committee or Board of Directors.
The
Audit Committee met with management and the independent accountants four times by telephone during the year ended December
31, 2016 to review quarterly and annual financial information and to discuss the results of quarterly review and annual audit
procedures performed by the independent accountants before quarterly and annual financial reports were issued. The Audit
Committee is responsible for appointing, compensating and overseeing actions taken by the Company's independent accountants,
and reviews the Company's internal financial controls and financial statements. The Audit Committee also oversees
management’s assessment and management of risks. Management and the independent accountants participated in all
meetings of the Audit Committee. Portions of each Audit Committee meeting were held between the Audit Committee members and
the independent accountants without the presence of management. The Committee reviewed the financial statements and the
annual audit results, including the independent accountants’ assessment of the Company’s internal controls and
procedures, and discussed with the independent accountants the matters denoted as required communications by Auditing
Standard AS1301, Communications with Audit Committees. The meetings also included a discussion and review of auditor
independence, the pre-approval of the independent accountants’ fees for 2016, and a recommendation to the Board of
Directors to approve the issuance of the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016. The report of the Audit
Committee for the year ended December 31, 2016 is included in this Proxy Statement. The Audit Committee Charter is
available at http://www.socketmobile.com/about-us/investor-relations/corporate-governance on the Company’s
website.
The
Nominating Committee Chairman is Dr. Bass who works with the other independent directors as a committee of the whole to consider
and recommend nominations for the Board of Directors and facilitate the self-assessment of Board performance by the independent
directors. The independent directors discussed nominations at the first regular board meeting of the year and Dr. Bass followed
up with each candidate. The role of the Nominating Committee is to determine that all nominated directors are willing and able
to serve as a director for the ensuing year and recommend their nomination. In addition, the independent directors met four times
during 2016 and once in January 2017 to date following their regular board meetings to consider matters relating to board governance,
oversight and effectiveness. For 2018, the Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by security holders. Such nominations
should be made in writing to the Company, attention Corporate Secretary, no later than November 15, 2017 in order to be considered
for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement. The Nominating Committee Charter is available on the Corporate Governance
section of the Company’s website at http://www.socketmobile.com/about-us/investor-relations/corporate-governance.
The
Compensation Committee chairman is Dr. Sealey who is retiring from the Board upon the conclusion of his current term. Mr. Chan
is expected to become Compensation Committee Chairman and Dr. Bass is expected to join the Committee. The Committee held nine
meetings during fiscal year 2016. The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining salaries, incentives and other forms
of compensation for directors and officers of the Company, approving stock option and other incentive award grants, approving
the Company's incentive compensation and benefit plans, and providing oversight of all matters affecting compensation including
overseeing management’s assessment and management of compensation-related risks. The report of the Compensation Committee
for fiscal year 2016 is included in this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee Charter is available on the Corporate Governance
section of the Company's website at http://www.socketmobile.com/about-us/investor-relations/corporate-governance.
COMPENSATION
OF DIRECTORS
Regular
meetings of the Board of Directors are scheduled once per quarter. Directors who are not employees of the Company receive $4,000
per regular meeting of the Board of Directors that they attend. Outside directors are also entitled to participate in the Company's
2004 Equity Incentive Plan. Grants of options to directors are made annually as compensation for Board service, committee service
and committee and Board leadership positions, generally at the time of annual election of the Board of Directors. Additional grants
may be awarded in recognition of services beyond normal board duties. See “Director Compensation” for information
regarding stock option grants awarded in 2016.
VOTE
REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD
If
a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, the six nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected to the Board
of Directors. Votes withheld from any nominee are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" ALL OF THE COMPANY'S NOMINEES FOR DIRECTORS.
PROPOSAL
TWO
APPROVAL
OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES
(“SAY-ON-PAY”)
Each
year our stockholders have the opportunity to vote to approve, on a nonbinding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive
officers as disclosed in this proxy statement.
As
described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and elsewhere in this proxy statement, we seek to closely align
the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders and to attract, motivate and retain our named executive
officers who are critical to our success. Our Compensation Committee regularly reviews named executive officer compensation to
ensure such compensation is consistent with our goals.
The
base salaries paid to our named executive officers are compared to other similar smaller technology public companies set forth
in a national compensation survey. Base salaries for executives are generally targeted between the median and 75
th
percentile of compensation levels for equivalent positions in smaller public technology companies but may be set to higher or
lower levels to recognize a particular executive’s role, responsibilities, skills, experience and performance.
Variable
performance based incentive awards for our named executive officers are intended to motivate and reward executives to meet or
exceed financial performance goals of revenue attainment and operating profitability measured both quarterly and annually based
on actual financial results for revenue and Earnings Before Taxes, Interest, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), a common
measure of operating performance, compared to financial targets set at the beginning of each year. The variable performance based
incentive award for our Chief Executive Officer also includes a portion based on increases in shareholder value as measured by
the market capitalization of the Company.
Long
term incentive awards for our named executive officers consist of stock option grants that are granted at the fair market value
on the date of grant and vest over a period of time, typically 4 years, through the stockholder-approved 2004 Equity Incentive
Plan. The goal is to align the financial interests of the named executive officers with those of stockholders by providing significant
incentives to manage the Company from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the business. The Compensation Committee
determines the size of each award based on the individual’s level of responsibility, recent performance, his or her potential
for future responsibility and promotion, the number of unvested options held by the individual at the time of the new grant, and
the size of the available stock award pool.
The
advisory vote on executive compensation solicited by this proposal is not intended to address any specific item of compensation,
but rather the overall compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our three other most highly-compensated
executive officers, who are collectively referred to as our “named executive officers,” which is disclosed elsewhere
in this proxy statement. The vote is advisory, which means that it is not binding on the Board of Directors, the Compensation
Committee or the Company in any way. However, the Compensation Committee will review the outcome of the vote and take it into
consideration when considering future executive compensation policies and decisions.
VOTE
REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD
RESOLVED,
that the stockholders of Socket Mobile, Inc. approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive
officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in the Company’s
definitive proxy statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" APPROVAL OF THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION.
PROPOSAL
THREE
RATIFICATION
OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The
Audit Committee has selected Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC, independent registered public accountants, to audit the financial
statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, and recommends that stockholders vote for ratification
of such appointment.
Sadler,
Gibb & Associates, LLC performed the audit of the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal years ended December
31, 2016 and for the four previous years. Representatives of Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC are expected to be available at
the 2017 Annual Meeting. The representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and are expected
to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
FEES
BILLED BY INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS DURING FISCAL YEARS 2016 AND 2015
Audit
Fees:
Audit
fees billed to the Company by Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC for their audit of the Company’s 2016 and 2015 fiscal year
financial statements totaled $80,000 in 2016 and $75,000 in 2015. Quarterly reviews of the Company's quarterly financial statements
for fiscal 2016 and 2015 were $12,000 in each fiscal year. The Company was not deemed an accelerated filer for fiscal years 2016
and 2015, and an audit of the Company's internal controls at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was not required.
Audit-Related
Fees:
Audit-related
fees billed to the Company by Sadler Gibb & Associates, LLC during the Company's 2016 and 2015 fiscal year totaled $1,500
and $zero, respectively. Audit-related services in 2016 were to provide a consent for the Company to incorporate the auditor’s
opinion on the prior year financial statements in a Form S-8 registration statement.
Tax
Fees:
Fees
billed to the Company by Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC for tax services during the Company’s 2016 and 2015 fiscal years
were $10,393 and $5,500, respectively. Tax fees are for preparation of the annual Federal and State tax returns.
All
Other Fees:
There
were no other fees billed to the Company during the Company's 2016 and 2015 fiscal years.
Approval
Procedures:
The
Audit Committee's policy is to pre-approve all audit and other permissible services provided by the independent accountants. These
services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally detailed
as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent accountants
and management are required to report periodically to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent
accountants in accordance with this pre-approval process and the fees for the services performed through such date. The Audit
Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. All services performed by the independent accountants
in fiscal 2016 and 2015 were preapproved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the
services described in this section is compatible with maintaining the independence of the Audit Firm and determined that it is.
VOTE
REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD
Ratification
of the appointment of Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC as the Company's independent registered public accountants for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2017 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Votes Cast on the matter at the 2017 Annual Meeting.
Stockholder
ratification of the appointment of Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC as the Company's independent registered public accountants
is not required by the Company's bylaws or other applicable legal requirement. However, the Audit Committee is submitting the
appointment of Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of common corporate practice.
If the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection. Even if the appointment
is ratified, the Audit Committee at its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent accounting firm at any
time during the year, if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF SADLER,
GIBB & ASSOCIATES, LLC AS THE COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table sets forth, as of the Record Date, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company's
Common Stock, including on an as-exercised basis, options and warrants exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date, and on an
as-converted basis convertible notes convertible within 60 days of the Record Date, as to (i) each person known by the Company
to own beneficially more than 5 percent of the outstanding shares of Common Stock; (ii) each director of the Company; (iii) each
executive officer of the Company named in the Summary Compensation table; and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the
Company as a group. Except as set forth below, the address of record for each of the individuals listed in this table is: c/o
Socket Mobile, Inc., 39700 Eureka Drive, Newark, California 94560.
Name
of Beneficial Owner (1)
|
Number
of Shares of Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
|
Percentage
of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned (2)
|
5%
Stockholders
|
|
|
Roy
L. Rogers (3)
|
313,538
|
5.3%
|
Directors
and Executive Officers
|
|
|
Charlie
Bass (4)
|
1,304,870
|
18.6%
|
Kevin
J. Mills (5)
|
387,956
|
6.3%
|
Lee
A. Baillif (6)
|
156,518
|
2.6%
|
David
W. Dunlap(7)
|
131,759
|
2.2%
|
Leonard
L. Ott (8)
|
106,121
|
1.7%
|
Peter
Sealey (9)
|
84,000
|
1.4%
|
Charles
C. Emery, Jr. (10)
|
80,315
|
1.3%
|
James
Lopez (9)
|
41,719
|
*
|
Brenton
Earl MacDonald (9)
|
7,000
|
*
|
Nelson
C. Chan (9)
|
7,000
|
*
|
Bill
Parnell (11)
|
zero
|
*
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (11 persons) (12)
|
2,307,258
|
29.3%
|
*Less
than 1%
___________________________
|
(1)
|
To
the Company’s knowledge, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment
power with respect to all shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them,
subject to community property laws where applicable and the information contained in
the footnotes to this table.
|
|
(2)
|
Percentage
ownership is based on 5,959,915 shares of Common Stock outstanding, each of which is
entitled to one vote, on the Record Date of April 17, 2017 and any shares issuable pursuant
to securities exercisable for shares of Common Stock by the person or group in question
as of the Record Date and within 60 days thereafter.
|
|
(3)
|
Shares
held by Roy L. Rogers as trustee for the Rogers Family Trust UTD 01-21-81 which holds
244,887 shares of Common Stock, and as trustee for the Roy and Ruth Rogers Unitrust,
UTD 09-28-89 which holds 68,651 shares of Common Stock. Mr. Rogers’ address is
27927 Briones Way, Los Altos Hills, CA 94022.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes
235,750 shares of Common Stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of April
17, 2017 and 835,896 shares subject to convertible notes plus interest that are convertible
into common stock within 60 days of April 17, 2017.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes
208,087 shares of Common Stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of April
17, 2017 and 27,928 shares subject to convertible notes plus interest that are convertible
into common stock within 60 days of April 17, 2017.
|
|
(6)
|
Includes
125,823 shares of Common Stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of April
17, 2017 and 29,337 shares subject to convertible notes plus interest that are convertible
into common stock within 60 days of April 17, 2017.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes
123,213 shares of Common Stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of April
17, 2017.
|
|
(8)
|
Includes
104,681 shares of Common Stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of April
17, 2017.
|
|
(9)
|
Consists
of shares of Common Stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of April 17,
2017.
|
|
(10)
|
Includes
51,200 shares of Common Stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of April
17, 2017 and 29,337 shares subject to convertible notes plus interest that are convertible
into common stock within 60 days of April 17, 2017.
|
|
(11)
|
New
director candidate. Reflects beneficial ownership as of the record date plus 60 days.
|
|
(12)
|
Includes
989,473 shares of Common Stock subject to options exercisable within 60 days of April
17, 2017 and 922,276 shares subject to convertible notes plus interest that are convertible
into common stock within 60 days of April 17, 2017.
|
SECTION
16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section
16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company's executive officers, directors and persons
who own more than ten percent of the Company's Common Stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC
and the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10 percent stockholders
are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. We prepare Section 16(a)
forms on behalf of our executive officers and directors based on the information provided by them. Based solely on review of this
information, the Company believes that during fiscal 2016 all of its executive officers and directors complied with their Section
16(a) filing requirements.
MANAGEMENT
The
named executive officers of the Company are as follows:
Name
of Officer
|
Age
|
Position
with the Company
|
Kevin
J. Mills
|
56
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
David
W. Dunlap
|
74
|
Vice
President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
|
Leonard
L. Ott
|
57
|
Vice
President of Engineering and CTO
|
Lee
A. Baillif
|
56
|
Vice
President of Operations
|
James Lopez
|
48
|
Vice
President of Sales, Marketing and Business Development
|
For
information regarding Kevin J. Mills and David W. Dunlap, please see "Proposal One - Election of Directors" above.
Leonard
L. Ott
has served as the Company's Vice President and Chief Technical Officer since October 2000 and also has served as Vice
President of Engineering since October 2013. Mr. Ott previously served as Vice President of Engineering from December 1998 to
October 2000. Mr. Ott joined the Company in March 1994, serving in increasingly responsible engineering positions including
Director of Software Development and Director of Engineering. Mr. Ott also worked as an engineering consultant to the Company,
from November 1993 to March 1994. Mr. Ott holds a B.A. degree in Computer Science from the University of California at Berkeley.
Lee
A. Baillif
has served as the Company’s Controller since January 1, 1999 and was promoted to Vice President and Controller
on January 24, 2007. Prior to his appointment as Controller, Mr. Baillif was a member of the accounting staff from September 1994.
Mr. Baillif was promoted to Vice President of Worldwide Operations and relinquished the Controller’s position effective
January 23, 2015. Mr. Baillif holds a B.S. degree in Business and Finance from San Francisco State University.
James
Lopez
has served as the Company’s Vice President of Marketing and Business Development since October 1, 2014 and assumed
the additional role as Vice President of Sales during 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Lopez was Head of Products for Atlona,
a company specializing in audio visual systems. From 2006 to 2013, Mr. Lopez worked in increasing responsible executive positions
at Logitech, most recently serving as General Manager of the Digital Video Surveillance Business Group. Prior to joining Logitech,
Mr. Lopez held increasing responsible executive positions with Electronics for Imaging, Inc. from 1993 to 2006, the last as Director,
Product Marketing and Strategy. Mr. Lopez holds a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from the University
of California, Berkeley.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Compensation
of Non-Employee Directors
The
following tables set forth the annual compensation paid to or accrued by the Company on behalf of the outside directors of the
Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
Name
|
Fees
Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (1)
|
Option
Awards ($)(2)(6)
|
Total
($)
|
Charlie
Bass (3)
|
$16,000
|
$22,300(3)
|
$38,300
|
Charles
C. Emery, Jr.(4)
|
$16,000
|
$
15,610(4)
|
$31,610
|
Peter
Sealey (5)
|
$16,000
|
$17,840(5)
|
$33,840
|
Brenton
MacDonald (6)
|
$8,000
|
$15,680(6)
|
$23,680
|
Nelson
C. Chan (7)
|
$4,000
|
$12,390(7)
|
$16,390
|
___________________________
|
(1)
|
Directors
are paid a fee for preparation and attendance at four regularly scheduled board meetings
at the rate of $4,000 per meeting attended, totaling $16,000 per year. All directors
attended all regular board meetings. Mr. MacDonald joined the Board on June 13, 2016.
Mr. Chan joined the Board on October 3, 2016.
|
|
(2)
|
Amounts
shown are not intended to reflect value actually received by the directors. Instead,
the amounts shown are the total fair value of option awards granted in fiscal 2016 for
financial statement reporting purposes, as determined pursuant to Financial Accounting
Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, or ASC Topic 718 (formerly
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R). These values are amortized as
equity compensation expense over the vesting period of the grants.
|
|
(3)
|
Mr.
Bass was granted an option to purchase 10,000 shares on May 10, 2016 with a grant date
fair value of $22,300.
|
|
(4)
|
Mr.
Emery was granted an option to purchase 7,000 shares on May 10, 2016 with a grant date
fair value of $15,610.
|
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Sealey was granted an option to purchase 8,000 shares on May 10, 2016 with a grant fair
value of $17,840.
|
|
(6)
|
Mr.
MacDonald was granted an option to purchase 7,000 shares on June 13, 2016 with a grant
fair value of $15,680.
|
|
(7)
|
Mr.
Chan was granted an option to purchase 7,000 shares on October 3, 2016 with a grant fair
value of $12,390.
|
|
(8)
|
Aggregate
number of option awards outstanding at December 31, 2016 were as follows: Charlie Bass,
235,750; Charles C. Emery Jr., 51,200; Peter Sealey, 84,000; Brenton MacDonald, 7,000;
Nelson C. Chan, 7,000.
|
The
outside directors are entitled to participate in the Company's 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. Grants of options to directors for
Board and Committee service are made annually, commencing at the start of the Board term. The grants made on during 2016 were
determined as follows: each Director was awarded an option to purchase 5,000 shares for participation in Board meetings. The director
serving as the Board chairperson received an option to purchase an additional 2,000 shares. Directors serving as chairpersons
of the Audit and Compensation Committees each received an option to purchase an additional 1,000 shares. Members serving on the
Audit Committee and on the Compensation Committee each received an option to purchase an additional 2,000 shares. As a result,
during 2016, the five outside directors as a group were granted options to purchase an aggregate of 39,000 shares. The options
vest monthly over the one year period of board service. Options granted on May 10, 2016 had an exercise price of $3.70 per share,
options granted on June 13, 2016 had an exercise price of $3.73 per share, and options granted on October 3, 2016 had an exercise
price of $2.71 per share, which were the fair market values of the Common Stock on the dates of grant. See also Proposal One –
Compensation of Directors.
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OVERVIEW
The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors establishes the general compensation policies of the Company as well as the compensation
plans and specific compensation levels for executive officers. Short term executive compensation consist of base salary and variable
incentive salary awards that are performance based. Long term executive compensation consists of stock option grants that vest
over time and gain in value as common stock values increase. The Committee strives to ensure that the Company's executive compensation
programs enable the Company to attract, retain, motivate and reward key people based on a pay-for-performance approach, targeted
between median and 75
th
percentile for equivalent positions in similar sized companies in similar fields of business
when target performance objectives are achieved, and potentially resulting in superior pay when superior performance objectives
are achieved. Within this framework, actual compensation can vary depending on each executive officer’s position, responsibilities
and overall experience. Overall, the Company strives to provide a total compensation package that is fair, reasonable and competitive
with prevailing practices in the Company's industry.
COMPENSATION
PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES
The
Company's compensation policies, plans and programs are intended to achieve the following objectives:
|
•
|
attract,
retain, motivate and reward talented executive officers and employees;
|
|
•
|
provide
executive officers with performance-based cash bonus opportunities linked to achievement
of financial objectives of revenue attainment and operating profitability; and
|
|
•
|
align
the financial interests of executive officers, directors and employees with those of
stockholders by providing each through the stock option program with an equity stake
in the Company.
|
The
Company's approach to executive compensation is to set base compensation levels between median and the 75
th
percentile
for similar positions in similar sized companies, reflecting the experience and performance of each individual compared to similar
positions in smaller technology based companies. Compensation may be set to higher or lower levels to recognize a particular employee
'
s
role, responsibilities, skills, experience and performance. Variable compensation targets are tied to financial performance so
as to motivate and reward positive performance of executive officers in driving the Company to achieve key financial objectives
including revenue attainment and profitability leading to increases in stockholder value. Long term equity incentives are offered
through its stock option program with annual grants to all executives commensurate with each executive’s level of responsibility,
experience and performance, while maintaining acceptable levels of dilution.
ELEMENTS
OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The
three major components of compensation for the Company's executive officers are:
(i)
base salaries;
(ii)
variable performance-based cash incentive awards; and
(iii)
long-term, equity-based incentive awards.
The
base salaries and variable performance-based incentive award components of the Company's compensation program are compared to
other similar smaller technology public companies set forth in a national compensation survey. The compensation survey is used
to benchmark the Company's executive and employee salaries, as it is a broad-based compensation survey with an emphasis on smaller
companies in the electronics industry and provides information on base salary and variable incentive awards based on size of companies
and geographic location. Offering competitive salary packages to employees is an essential element of attracting and retaining
key employees in the San Francisco Bay Area including Silicon Valley, which has many electronics firms that compete for talent
and offer a variety of employment alternatives.
Base
Salaries
. The Compensation Committee establishes a competitive base salary for each executive officer designed to recognize
the skills and experience the individual brings to the Company and the performance contributions he or she makes. Base salaries
for executives are generally targeted between median compensation levels and the 75
th
percentile for smaller public
technology companies, but may be set to higher or lower levels to recognize a particular executive’s role, responsibilities,
skills, experience and performance.
The
Compensation Committee determines both the amount and timing of base salary increases for executive officers. Factors affecting
the level of base salary increases each year include the overall financial performance of the Company, changes in the base salary
compensation levels reported in a national survey for executive positions in similarly sized companies, and the individual performance
of each executive.
Variable
Performance Based Incentive Awards
.
Variable
salaries
for the named executive officers are entirely performance based. Variable incentive compensation targets are set
each year for each named executive officer. Target awards are allocated 15% to each quarter and 40% to an annual measurement,
split equally between revenue attainment and attainment of EBITDA profits compared to an annual financial plan approved by the
Board of Directors. Awards may only be paid from a portion of EBITDA profits earned in the measurement period. Actual variable
compensation payments as a percentage of variable compensation targets for the past three years are shown in the following table
for the Named Executive Officers.
Variable
Performance Based Incentive Awards as a percentage of Incentive targets:
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
Kevin
J. Mills (1)
|
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
87.5
|
%
|
|
|
64.5%
|
|
|
|
86.1
|
%
|
David
W. Dunlap (2)
|
|
Vice
President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Director
|
|
|
96.9
|
%
|
|
|
74.3%
|
|
|
|
88.9
|
%
|
Leonard L. Ott
(3)
|
|
Vice President of Engineering and Chief Technical Officer
|
|
|
96.9
|
%
|
|
|
74.3%
|
|
|
|
88.9
|
%
|
Lee A. Baillif
(4)
|
|
Vice President and Controller (through January 23, 2015); Vice President of Operations (after January
23, 2015).
|
|
|
96.9
|
%
|
|
|
74.3%
|
|
|
|
88.9
|
%
|
James Lopez
(5)
|
|
Vice President
of Sales, Marketing and Business Development
|
|
|
96.9
|
%
|
|
|
74.3%
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Variable
financial incentive compensation target for Mr. Mills was set at $100,000 for each of
the years 2014 through 2016. 20% of the target was based on attainment of market capitalization
goals set by the Board of Directors at the beginning of each year.
|
|
(2)
|
Variable
financial incentive compensation target for Mr. Dunlap was set at $50,000 for each of
the years 2014 through 2016.
|
|
(3)
|
Variable
financial incentive compensation target for Mr. Ott was set at $35,000 for each of the
years 2014 through 2016.
|
|
(4)
|
Variable
financial incentive compensation target for Mr. Baillif was set at $20,000 for 2014 and
at $30,000 for 2015 and 2016.
|
|
(5)
|
Variable
financial incentive compensation target for Mr. Lopez was set at $65,000 for 2015 and
2016. Mr. Lopez attainment was guaranteed at 100% for the fourth quarter of 2014, his
first quarter with the Company.
|
Long-Term
Equity-Based Incentive Awards.
Long-Term
Equity-Based Incentive Awards are provided through the stockholder-approved 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. Although the Equity Incentive
Plan provides for a variety of equity incentive awards, to date the Compensation Committee has only awarded stock option grants
from the Equity Incentive Plan. The goal of the Company's long-term, equity-based incentive awards is to align the financial interests
of the executive officers and employees of the Company with those of stockholders and to provide each executive officer and employee
with a significant incentive to manage the Company from the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the business. All
equity incentives are subject to vesting provisions to encourage executive officers and employees to remain employed with the
Company. The Compensation Committee determines the size of each award based on the individual’s level of responsibility,
recent performance, his or her potential for future responsibility and promotion, the number of unvested options held by the individual
at the time of the new grant, and the size of the available stock award pool to arrive at a level that the Committee considers
appropriate to create a meaningful opportunity for equity participation by the individual.
As
of December 31, 2016, there were 95,981 shares available for grant under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, the 2004
Equity Incentive Plan provided for an automatic increase each January 1
st
equal to the least of (a) 400,000 shares,
(b) 4% of the outstanding shares on that date, or (c) a lesser amount as determined by the Board of Directors. The increase in
shares available for grant on January 1, 2017 was 235,136 shares. Options are granted to executive officers, employees and consultants
at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The Board of Directors itself, in consultation with management, grants options
annually to directors for service on the Board of Directors.
The
Compensation Committee, in consultation with management, prepares an annual allocation plan dividing the available stock in the
grant pool among refresher grants, new employee grants, director grants and reserves. The timing, award criteria and award procedures
are discussed more fully under Equity Incentive Grant Policies in the next section. New employee grants are typically made on
the first trading day of the month on or following the date of hire. Refresher grants are made annually, typically during the
first quarter of the year. Refresher grants typically vest monthly over 48 months, contingent upon continued employment with the
Company. All grants expire ten years after the date of grant. Fully vested grants, or grants vesting over a shorter or longer
term than four years, may be awarded at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Stock options provide a return only if the
individual remains with the Company and only if the market price of the Company’s Common Stock appreciates during the option
term.
The
Compensation Committee believes that stock option grants are effective in attracting and retaining key employees, and the Company
provides initial grants to all new employees and annual refresher grants to all continuing employees with a weighting reflecting
the level of responsibility and performance of the employee. Many of the senior executives and employees have been employed by
the Company more than ten years and have amassed a number of annual stock option grants (grants expire 10 years after the date
of grant) with potential for substantial cumulative compensation if stock prices increase, thus aligning their interests with
those of stockholders. The Company believes stock options are effective long-term incentives because of the expectations of the
management team and employees that the Company’s products and the markets they address provide opportunities for growth
that may result in share price appreciation.
Other
Compensation.
Executive
officers are entitled to participate in the same health and benefit programs and 401(k) program as are available to all employees
of the Company and do not receive any perquisites from the Company.
EQUITY
INCENTIVE GRANT POLICIES
General
option grant practices
. All stock options grants are awarded by the Compensation Committee, or by the full Board in the case
of director stock option grants. All stock options are priced at the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock
on the date of grant, and the actions of the Compensation Committee are documented in minutes that are retained in the minute
book of the Company. During 2016, the Compensation Committee met nine times, and stock option grants were awarded at seven of
those meetings.
Initial
stock option grants.
The Compensation Committee awards initial stock option grants to each new employee of the Company on
the first trading day of the month following the individual’s commencement of employment. The size of the grant is based
on the responsibilities of the employee and as agreed to in the employee’s employment offer. Grants for executive officers
are approved by the Compensation Committee in advance of offers being made. Grants to rank-and-file employees are made within
general guidelines reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee, and the actual grant requires the approval of the Compensation
Committee at the time of grant. Initial grants generally vest 25% on the one year anniversary of employment and 1/48
th
per month thereafter for a total vesting period of 48 months. The delay in initial vesting for the first twelve months of employment
provides an incentive for employee retention and ensures that the employee is familiar with the Company and its goals and objectives
prior to options vesting. During 2016, options to purchase an aggregate of 46,000 shares were awarded to 5 new employees representing
13.4 percent of options granted during the year.
Refresher
employee stock option grants
. The Compensation Committee awards refresher stock option grants annually and supplemental grants
based on the recommendations of management reflecting the responsibilities and performance of each employee and the employee’s
contributions in meeting the Company’s goals and objectives. During 2016, the Compensation Committee awarded annual refresher
options to purchase an aggregate of 255,500 shares to 51 employees, representing 75.3 percent of options granted during the year.
Director
stock option grants
. A portion of the compensation of the Company’s outside directors is in the form of an annual stock
option grant. Director grants are granted by the full Board of Directors at the first regularly scheduled board meeting following
the annual election of directors and vest monthly over the ensuing year of service. Options are awarded equally to all directors
for Board service. Additional options are awarded for Board and committee leadership positions and Committee service, as discussed
under “
Director Compensation”.
During 2016, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of 39,000
shares to the 5 independent directors of the Company, representing 11.3 percent of options granted during the year.
ACCOUNTING
AND TAX IMPLICATIONS
Accounting
for Stock Based Compensation.
On January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, Stock Compensation (formerly FASB Statement 123(R)) for the fiscal years ended December
31, 2006 and beyond. Under ASC Topic 718, the Company uses a binomial lattice valuation model to estimate fair value of stock
option grants made on or after January 1, 2006. The binomial lattice model incorporates estimates for expected volatility, risk-free
interest rates, employee exercise patterns and post-vesting employment termination behavior. These estimates affect the calculation
of the fair value of the Company’s stock option grants. The fair value of stock option grants outstanding prior to January
1, 2006 was estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company adopted the modified prospective recognition method
and implemented the provisions of ASC Topic 718 (formerly under FASB Statement 123(R)) beginning with the first quarter of 2006.
Income
taxes.
The Company has not provided any executive officer or director with a gross-up or other reimbursement for tax amounts
the executive might pay pursuant to Section 280G or Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Although the 2004 Equity Incentive
Plan also allows for the issuance of grants qualifying as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code, no stock option grants deemed performance-based compensation grants have been awarded to the executive
officers of the Company.
COMPENSATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
The
Company’s Chief Executive Officer Kevin Mills is compensated under the same compensation structure applied to all of the
Executive Officers of the Company as described under
Elements of Executive Compensation,
specifically base salary, variable
performance based compensation, and long term equity incentive awards in the form of stock option grants.
Base
Salary:
Mr. Mill’s annual base salary was increased during the second quarter of 2014 from $190,000 to $225,000 and
maintained in 2015 and 2016 at $225,000. Base salary was set at median levels for CEO’s of similar sized companies based
on national compensation salary survey data.
Variable
Compensation
. Mr. Mills’ variable salary target of $100,000 is set above the median levels for CEO’s of similar
sized companies based on national compensation salary survey data. All variable compensation awards are performance based. During
2014 through 2016, 80 percent of the variable compensation for Mr. Mills was calculated in the same manner as for the other Named
Executive Officers, with 40 percent of his variable salary target based on revenue attainment and 40 percent of his variable salary
target based on attainment of Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), a traditional non-GAAP
measure of operating profitability, both measured in comparison to the annual financial plan of the Company approved at the beginning
of each year by the Board of Directors. Target compensation is allocated 15 percent based on quarterly results (total of 60%)
and 40% based on annual results. Payments under the Management Incentive Variable Compensation Plan are further limited by minimum
performance thresholds, and payments to all executives under this plan may not exceed 50 percent of EBITDA profits for the measurement
period. During 2014 through 2016, 20 percent of the variable compensation target for Mr. Mills was based on attainment of market
capitalization targets approved by the Board of Directors at the beginning of the year See
Performance Based Variable Incentive
Awards
under Elements of Executive Compensation for attainment percentages earned by Mr. Mills over the past three years compared
to the other Named Executive Officers of the Company.
Long
term equity incentive awards.
Mr. Mills received an annual employee refresher grant in 2016 of 25,000 shares vesting monthly
over a 48-month period representing 7.3 percent of total shares granted in 2016. All stock options were granted at the closing
market price on the date of grant.
Benefits
.
Mr. Mills participates in the same benefit programs as all of the employees of the Company. The CEO’s employment is subject
to an employment contract which provides for six months of continuation of base salary and medical benefits in the event of involuntary
termination of services other than for cause, and payment of his variable salary entitlements had he remained employed during
this period in the event of a change in control or involuntary termination. The CEO receives no perquisites.
Summary
Compensation Table
For
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016
The
following table provides fiscal 2016 compensation information and comparable information for the two preceding fiscal years for
the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the three other executive officers of the Company who were the most
highly compensated in fiscal year 2016 (the “
Named Executive Officers
”).
Name
and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)(1)
|
Option
Awards ($)(2)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan Compensation ($)(3)
|
Total
($)
|
Kevin J. Mills (4)
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
2016
2015
2014
|
$225,000
225,000
213,041
|
$46,750
32,200
18,650
|
$87,483
64,468
86,105
|
$359,233
321,668
317,396
|
David
W. Dunlap (5)
Vice
President of Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
|
2016
2015
2014
|
$190,000
190,000
183,166
|
$40,015
22,540
8,960
|
$48,427
37,168
44,441
|
$278,442
249,708
236,567
|
Leonard
L. Ott (6)
Vice
President of Engineering and Chief Technical Officer
|
2016
2015
2014
|
$175,000
175,000
168,167
|
$32,725
22,540
8,960
|
$33,899
26,017
31,108
|
$241,624
223,557
208,235
|
Lee
A. Baillif (7)
Vice
President and Controller (thru 1/23/15)
Vice President Operations (from 1/23/15)
|
2016
2015
2014
|
$165,000
161,667
136,458
|
$37,400
28,175
8,960
|
$29,056
22,300
17,776
|
$231,456
212,142
163,195
|
James
Lopez (8)
Vice
President of Sales, Marketing & Business Development
|
2016
2015
2014
|
$210,000
210,000
52,500
|
$32,725
26,565
73,600
|
$62,955
48,318
9,750
|
$
305,680
284,883
135,850
|
___________________________
|
(1)
|
Represents
base salary as described under
Compensation Summary and Analysis — Elements
of Executive Compensation
.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents
Long-Term, Equity-Based Incentive Awards as described under
Compensation Summary and
Analysis — Elements of Executive Compensation
. Amounts shown do not reflect
compensation actually received by the executive officer. Instead, the amounts shown are
the total grant date valuations of stock option grants awarded during the year as determined
pursuant to ASC Topic 718. The valuations are expensed for financial reporting purposes
over the vesting period of the grant.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents
Variable Incentive Awards as described under
Compensation Summary and Analysis —
Elements of Executive Compensation
.
|
|
(4)
|
Mr.
Mills’ base salary was increased during the second quarter of 2014. His previous
increase was in 2007.
|
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Dunlap’s base salary was increased during the second quarter of 2014. His previous
increase was in 2007.
|
|
(6)
|
Mr.
Ott’s base salary was increased during the second quarter of 2014. His previous
increase was in 2007.
|
|
(7)
|
Mr.
Baillif’s base salary was increased during the second quarter of 2014 and again
on March 2, 2015 resulting from his promotion to Vice President of Operations on January
23, 2015. His previous increase was in 2007.
|
|
(8)
|
Mr.
Lopez joined the Company on October 1, 2014.
|
GRANTS
OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
For
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016
The
following table shows for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 certain information regarding options granted to the Named Executive
Officers. Options were granted as described under
Compensation Summary and Analysis — Elements of Executive Compensation
— Long-Term, Equity-Based Incentive Awards
and
— Equity Incentive Grant Policies.
Name
|
|
Grant Dates
|
|
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)
|
|
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/share)
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(1)
|
Kevin J. Mills
|
|
2/22/2016
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
|
$
|
46,750
|
|
David
W. Dunlap
|
|
2/22/2016
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
|
$
|
40,015
|
|
|
|
6/20/2016
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard
L. Ott
|
|
2/22/2016
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
|
$
|
32,725
|
|
Lee
A. Baillif
|
|
2/22/2016
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
|
$
|
37,400
|
|
James
Lopez
|
|
2/22/2016
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
$
|
2.75
|
|
|
$
|
32,725
|
|
(1)
The value of option awards is based on the fair value as of the grant date of such award, determined pursuant to ASC Topic 718
(formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R). The Fair Value of options issued on February 23, 2015 was $1.61
per share. Under ASC Topic 718, the Company uses a binomial lattice valuation model to estimate fair value of stock option grants
made on or after January 1, 2006. The binomial lattice model incorporates estimates for expected volatility, risk-free interest
rates, employee exercise patterns and post-vesting employment termination behavior. These estimates affect the calculation of
the fair value of the Company’s stock option grants. The exercise price for all options granted to the Named Executive Officers
is equal to the closing market price for the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date as reported on the OTC Market. Regardless
of whatever value is placed on a stock option on the grant date, the actual value of the option to the recipient will depend on
the market value of the Company’s Common Stock at such date in the future when the option is exercised.
OPTION
EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
For
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016
Name
|
Option
Awards
|
Number
of Shares Acquired on Exercise
(#)
|
Value
Realized on Exercise
($)(1)
|
Kevin
J. Mills
|
21,560
|
$28,028
|
David
W. Dunlap
|
15,000
|
$39,840
|
Leonard
L. Ott
|
17,400
|
$27,466
|
___________________________
|
(1)
|
The
value realized equals the difference between the option exercise price and the fair market
value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of exercise, multiplied by the
number of shares for which the option was exercised.
|
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS
At
Fiscal 2016 Year-End
The
following table set forth certain information concerning outstanding equity awards held by the Named Executive Officers at the
end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
Name
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options - Exercisable (#)(1)
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options - Unexercisable (#)(1)(2)
|
|
|
Option Exercise Price ($)(3)
|
|
Option Expiration Date(4)
|
Kevin J. Mills
|
|
|
8,625
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
6/1/2019
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
|
|
6/1/2020
|
|
|
|
88,700
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
7/1/2020
|
|
|
|
19,920
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
2/22/2021
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
2/27/2022
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
8/1/2022
|
|
|
|
8,900
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
11/9/2022
|
|
|
|
14,327
|
|
|
|
|
1,302
|
|
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
4/1/2023
|
|
|
|
13,750
|
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
3/3/2024
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
6/2/2024
|
|
|
|
8,750
|
|
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
|
|
2/23/2025
|
|
|
|
4,688
|
|
|
|
|
20,312
|
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
2/22/2026
|
David W. Dunlap
|
|
|
14,680
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1.96
|
|
|
|
2/23/2019
|
|
|
|
5,250
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
6/1/2019
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
|
|
6/1/2020
|
|
|
|
54,500
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
7/1/2020
|
|
|
|
14,060
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
2/22/2021
|
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
2/27/2022
|
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
11/9/2022
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
4/1/2023
|
|
|
|
4,625
|
|
|
|
|
4,375
|
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
3/3/2024
|
|
|
|
6,125
|
|
|
|
|
7,875
|
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
|
|
2/23/2025
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
|
14,219
|
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
2/22/2026
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
|
6/20/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard L. Ott
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
6/1/2019
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
|
|
6/1/2020
|
|
|
|
54,600
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
7/1/2020
|
|
|
|
11,040
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
2/22/2021
|
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
2/27/2022
|
|
|
|
13,587
|
|
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
4/1/2023
|
|
|
|
9,625
|
|
|
|
|
4,375
|
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
3/3/2024
|
|
|
|
6,125
|
|
|
|
|
9,844
|
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
|
|
2/23/2025
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
|
16,250
|
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
2/22/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lee A. Baillif
|
|
|
8,950
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1.96
|
|
|
|
2/23/2019
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
6/1/2019
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
|
|
6/1/2020
|
|
|
|
28,700
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
7/1/2020
|
|
|
|
17,240
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
2/22/2021
|
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
2/27/2022
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
8/1/2022
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
11/9/2022
|
|
|
|
13,671
|
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
4/1/2023
|
|
|
|
9,625
|
|
|
|
|
4,375
|
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
3/3/2024
|
|
|
|
7,656
|
|
|
|
|
9,844
|
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
|
|
2/23/2025
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
|
16,250
|
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
2/22/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Lopez
|
|
|
21,667
|
|
|
|
|
18,333
|
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
10/1/2024
|
|
|
|
7,219
|
|
|
|
|
9,281
|
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
|
|
2/23/2025
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
|
14,219
|
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
2/22/2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Options
were granted as described under Compensation Summary and Analysis — Elements of
Executive Compensation — Long-Term, Equity-Based Incentive Awards and — Equity
Incentive Grant Policies. The vesting period and vesting start date were established
by the Compensation Committee. Shares unexercisable were not vested at December 31, 2016.
|
|
(2)
|
Grant
dates and vesting period information for all grants not fully vested as of December 31,
2015 are as follows:
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Expiration
Date
|
|
Vesting
Start Date
|
|
Months
to fully vest
|
4/1/2013
|
|
4/1/2023
|
|
4/1/2013
|
|
48
|
3/3/2014
|
|
3/3/2024
|
|
3/1/2014
|
|
48
|
2/23/2015
|
|
2/23/2025
|
|
3/1/2015
|
|
48
|
2/22/2016
|
|
2/22/2026
|
|
3/1/2016
|
|
48
|
6/20/2016
|
|
6/20/2026
|
|
6/20/2016
|
|
24
|
|
(3)
|
Exercise
prices are set at the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of
grant (fair market value).
|
|
(4)
|
Options
expire ten years from the date of grant.
|
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The
following table provides information as of December 31, 2016 about the Common Stock that may be issued under all equity compensation
plans of the Company.
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders (1)
|
2,161,085
|
$ 2.27
|
95,981
|
|
(1)
|
Consists
of the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. The Plan was extended by the stockholders at their
annual meeting on June 5, 2013 and will expire on April 23, 2024. Pursuant to an affirmative
vote by stockholders in June 2004 as amended on June 4, 2015, an annual increase in the
number of shares authorized under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan is added on the first
day of each fiscal year equal to the least of (a) 400,000 shares, (b) four percent of
the total outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock on that date, or (c)
a lesser amount as determined by the Board of Directors. As a result, a total of 235,136
shares became available for grant under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan on January 1,
2017, in addition to those set forth in the table above.
|
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT
The
Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management.
Based
on the Compensation Committee’s review and discussion noted above, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of
Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A.
|
|
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter
Sealey, Chairman
|
Dated:
April 21, 2017
|
|
|
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
None
of the members of the Compensation Committee have ever been an officer or employee of the Company. No executive officer of the
Company serves as a member of the board or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving
as a member of the Company's Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.
POST
EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL COMPENSATION FOR EXECUTIVES
On
July 1, 2015 the Company updated and renewed Employment Agreements (“Agreements”) with the following officers of the
Company: Kevin J. Mills, President and Chief Executive Officer; David W. Dunlap, Vice President of Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary; James Lopez, Vice President of Marketing and Business Development; Leonard L. Ott, Vice
President of Engineering and Chief Technical Officer; and Lee A. Baillif, Vice President of Operations (collectively the “Executives”).
The Agreements replaced agreements that expired on June 30, 2015 (December 31, 2015 for Mr. Lopez).
Under
the terms of the Agreements, the Executive’s employment is at will and termination of employment of the Executive may occur
at any time. The Agreement defines termination arrangements that apply if the Executive is terminated for Cause as defined in
the Agreement, is terminated due to death or disability, voluntarily terminates employment, or is otherwise terminated involuntarily.
Should the Executive’s employment be terminated other than for Cause, death, disability or voluntary termination, the Executive
is entitled under the Agreement to (i) receive an involuntary termination payment consisting of his regular base salary for a
period of two (2) months plus one month for each completed two years of service up to a maximum of five (5) months following termination,
(ii) receive one additional month of compensation upon signing a mutual termination agreement; (iii) receive reimbursement for
payment of his COBRA health premiums for the lesser of the amount of time of the involuntary termination payment or until he is
eligible for the health insurance benefits provided by another employer; (iv) receive the variable compensation amounts to which
he would otherwise be entitled as prescribed in the Company’s variable incentive compensation plan, and (v) purchase from
the Company at book value certain items that were purchased by the Company for his use. Stock options granted to the Executive
shall cease vesting immediately upon the date of termination of employment, and vested stock options will be exercisable after
termination for the lesser of one year or the expiration date of the grant. In the event of voluntary termination with at least
a 60 day notice by an Executive with more than ten years of consecutive service to the Company, the Executive’s vested stock
options will be exercisable after termination for the remaining life of the grants. The Agreements also provide for compensation
in the event of a Change of Control as defined in the Agreement consisting of an involuntary termination payment as described
above and a payment equal to 1% of the consideration payable in connection with a Change of Control provided that the price offered
for the Company’s common stock is equal to or greater than $5.00 per share. The new Agreements expire on June 30, 2018 unless
the Company fails to provide the Executive with notice of intent to renew or not renew the Agreement of at least six months prior
to expiration, in which case the expiration date of the Agreement shall be December 31, 2018.
The
foregoing description of the Employment Agreements does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the full text of the Form of Employment Agreement, a copy of which was filed in a Form 8-K dated July 1, 2015.
Payments
to be made to each of the Named Executive Officers following severance are estimated as follows:
Compensation
and
Benefits
|
Voluntary
Resignation
|
For
Cause (1)
|
For
Good
Reason(2)
|
Involuntary
Without
Cause(2)
|
Involuntary
or For Good
Reason After
Change-in-
Control(2)
|
Due
to
Death or
Disability(2)
|
Kevin
J. Mills
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary (3)
|
—
|
—
|
$112,500
|
$112,500
|
$112,500
|
$112,500
|
Variable
Incentive (4)
|
—
|
—
|
12,000
|
12,000
|
12,000
|
12,000
|
Stock
Options (5)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
HealthCare
Benefits (6)
|
—
|
—
|
7,604
|
7,604
|
7,604
|
7,604
|
Other
Perquisites (7)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
David
W. Dunlap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary (3)
|
—
|
—
|
95,000
|
95,000
|
95,000
|
95,000
|
Variable
Incentive (4)
|
—
|
—
|
7,500
|
7,500
|
7,500
|
7,500
|
Stock
Options (5)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—-
|
—
|
—
|
HealthCare
Benefits (6)
|
—
|
—
|
6,079
|
6,079
|
6,079
|
6,079
|
Other
Perquisites (7)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Leonard
L. Ott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary (3)
|
—
|
—
|
87,500
|
87,500
|
87,500
|
87,500
|
Variable
Incentive (4)
|
—
|
—
|
5,250
|
5,250
|
5,250
|
5,250
|
Stock
Options (5)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
HealthCare
Benefits (6)
|
—
|
—
|
4,709
|
4,709
|
4,709
|
4,709
|
Other
Perquisites (7)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Lee
A. Baillif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary (3)
|
—
|
—
|
82,500
|
82,500
|
82,500
|
82,500
|
Variable
Incentive (4)
|
—
|
—
|
4,500
|
4,500
|
4,500
|
4,500
|
Stock
Options (5)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
HealthCare
Benefits (6)
|
—
|
—
|
7,681
|
7,681
|
7,681
|
7,681
|
Other
Perquisites (7)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
James
Lopez
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base
Salary (3)
|
—
|
—
|
105,000
|
105,000
|
105,000
|
105,000
|
Variable
Incentive (4)
|
—
|
—
|
9,750
|
9,750
|
9,750
|
9,750
|
Stock
Options (5)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
HealthCare
Benefits (6)
|
—
|
—
|
6,011
|
6,011
|
6,011
|
6,011
|
Other
Perquisites (7)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
___________________________
|
(1)
|
Cause
is defined in each executive’s employment agreement to include: willful and continuing
breach of duties; performing paid services for others without authorization; participation
in a business that is competitive; acts of dishonesty, misappropriation, embezzlement,
fraud, or insider trading; conviction for a felony; inappropriate conduct including harassment,
violation of ethics or laws, or use of controlled substances.
|
|
(2)
|
All
reasons for termination except voluntary resignation or termination by the Company for
Cause are covered under the terms of the employment agreement as either resignation by
the executive for good reason or involuntary termination by the Company without cause.
The payment amount is based on a six month payment period which presumes the Executive
has signed a mutual release agreement.
|
|
(3)
|
Except
in the case of voluntary resignation or termination for Cause, base salary is continued
from the date of termination for two months plus one month for each year of completed
service up to a maximum of six months.
|
|
(4)
|
Except
in the cases of voluntary resignation or termination for cause, scheduled variable incentive
payments are paid which equal a pro rata share of the bonus to which the executive would
have otherwise been entitled for the quarter of termination. Amounts included in this
table assume entitlements equal to 15% of the target variable compensation in effect
for 2016.
|
|
(5)
|
Except
in the cases of voluntary resignation or termination for cause, stock options vested
as of the date of termination may be exercised for a period of up to one year based on
formulas in the executive’s employment agreement. In the event of a change in control,
all options granted and outstanding become vested and fully exercisable. In the event
of termination for cause or voluntary resignation, stock options vested as of the date
of termination may be exercised for a period of 90 days following the termination date.
Executives who voluntary terminate employment with ten years or more of continuous service
may exercise vested shares through the expiration date of each grant.
|
|
(6)
|
Except
in the cases of voluntary resignation or termination for cause, healthcare benefits are
continued up to the earlier of the expiration of the base salary continuation period
(see note 3) or securing other employment that includes such benefits.
|
|
(7)
|
There
are no perquisites in the compensation packages of any of the executive officers.
|
LIMITATION
OF LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION MATTERS
Pursuant
to the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Company has adopted provisions in its Certificate of Incorporation that eliminate
the personal liability of directors to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of the directors' fiduciary
duties in certain circumstances. In addition, the Company's bylaws require the Company to indemnify the Company's directors and
officers and authorize the Company to indemnify its employees and other agents to the fullest extent permitted by law.
The
Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its current directors and officers that provide for indemnification
and advancement of expenses to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, including circumstances in which indemnification
or the advancement of expenses is discretionary under Delaware law.
The
Company believes that the limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in its Certificate of Incorporation and bylaws
and the indemnification agreements with its directors and officers enhance its ability to continue to attract and retain qualified
individuals to serve as directors and officers. There is no pending litigation or proceeding involving a director, officer or
employee to which these provisions or agreements would apply.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
The
Company and its Board of Directors are committed to high standards of corporate governance as an important component in building
and maintaining stockholder value. To this end, the Company regularly reviews its corporate governance policies and practices
to ensure that its policies are consistent with such standards. The Company closely monitors guidance issued or proposed by the
Securities Exchange Commission or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the listing standards of the NASDAQ Market, the
provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act and pending legislation. As a result of review of these matters, as well
as the emerging best practices of other companies, the Company has implemented the following:
Executive
Compensation Authority; Compensation Committee
|
•
|
The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approves all compensation plans and
amounts for the executive officers of the Company, following consultation with management.
|
|
•
|
The
Compensation Committee reviews and approves compensation programs for all other employees
of the Company, upon the recommendation of management. These reviews consider an assessment
of whether such programs may promote excessive risk taking.
|
|
•
|
The
Compensation Committee approves all stock option grants, upon the recommendation of management,
except director grants, which are approved by the full Board of Directors.
|
|
•
|
The
charter of the Compensation Committee makes explicit:
|
-
the
Committee’s ability to retain independent consultants and experts as it sees fit, at Company expense;
-
the
Compensation Committee’s responsibilities to assess the risk associated with compensation programs
Director
Independence
|
•
|
The
Board of Directors has confirmed that a majority of the Company's directors are independent,
as defined by current SEC regulations and Nasdaq rules.
|
|
•
|
The
Company's independent directors hold formal meetings without the presence of management
and chaired by an independent director.
|
|
•
|
The
Audit, Compensation and Nominating Committees consist solely of independent directors.
Each Committee is tasked to establish goals, evaluate performance, review the adequacy
of its Charter, and recommend changes to the Board of Directors.
|
Audit
Committee
|
•
|
All
Audit Committee members possess the required level of financial literacy, as required
by SEC regulations.
|
|
•
|
Dr.
Bass, a member of the Audit Committee, possesses the qualifications of an “audit
committee financial expert,” as required by SEC regulations.
|
|
•
|
The
Audit Committee’s charter formalizes and makes explicit the following:
|
|
o
|
The
Audit Committee's ability to retain independent consultants and experts as it sees fit,
at Company expense;
|
|
o
|
The
Audit Committee's authority to appoint, review and assess the performance of the Company's
independent auditors;
|
|
o
|
The
Audit Committee's ability to hold regular executive sessions with the Company's independent
auditors and with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Controller and other Company
officers directly, as it considers appropriate;
|
|
o
|
The
requirement that the Audit Committee review and approve in advance non-audit services
by the Company's independent auditors, as well as related party transactions;
|
|
o
|
The
Audit Committee's duty to maintain a formal complaint monitoring procedure (a “whistleblower”
policy) to enable confidential and anonymous reporting to the Audit Committee;
|
|
o
|
The
Audit Committee's authority over the independent auditors' rotation policy; and
|
|
o
|
The
Audit Committee’s responsibilities to oversee the Company’s risk management
policies and practices.
|
Other
Governance Matters
|
•
|
The
Company has a formal Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all officers,
directors and employees.
|
|
•
|
The
Company has a requirement that any waiver or amendment to the Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics involving a director or officer be reviewed by the Nominating Committee and
disclosed to the Company's stockholders.
|
|
•
|
Each
of the Compensation Committee, Audit and Nominating Committees has a written charter.
|
|
•
|
The
Company has an Insider Trading Policy, including control procedures to comply with current
SEC regulations and Nasdaq/OTC rules.
|
|
•
|
The
Company has a policy that the Board of Directors reviews its own performance on an at
least annual basis.
|
|
•
|
The
Company prohibits loans to its officers and directors.
|
Board
Leadership
The
Company is focused on its corporate governance practices and values independent board oversight as an essential component of strong
corporate performance to enhance stockholder value. Our commitment to independent oversight is demonstrated by the fact that all
of our directors, except for Mr. Mills and Mr. Dunlap, are independent. In addition, all of the members of our Board’s committees
are independent. Our Board of Directors acts independently of management and regularly holds independent director sessions without
members of management present. In addition, the Company has a separate position of Chairman of the Board which is held by Mr.
Bass, an independent director, who provides additional oversight to the management of the Company. Our Board believes that the
current board leadership structure is best for the Company and its stockholders at this time as it allows the recommendations
and decisions of the President and Chief Executive Officer, who views such recommendations and decisions from a management perspective,
to be reviewed and discussed with the Chairman of the Board, who views such recommendations and decisions from the perspective
of an independent director.
Risk
Management
-
The
Company has designated its Chief Financial and Administrative Officer as its Risk Management Officer with responsibility for identifying,
assessing, monitoring and reporting risks that could potentially impact the business.
-
The
Company summarizes the primary risks associated with the business in its quarterly and annual reports on Forms 10-Q and 10-K,
respectively.
-
The
Audit Committee has primary responsibility for Board oversight of risk management. The Audit Committee meets as necessary, at
least quarterly, and matters involving risk are included in the Audit Committee’s agenda. The Chairman of the Audit Committee
who is also Chairman of the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer conduct a call at least weekly to review Company
operations and such discussions include a review of risk matters as appropriate.
Compensation
Risk Considerations
The
Compensation Committee has responsibility for oversight of risk management associated with compensation matters and risks relating
to compensation policies and practices are considered at each meeting of the Committee. The Committee does not believe that the
Company’s compensation policies and practices promote risky behavior on the part of its employees as discussed below.
The
Compensation Committee considers, in establishing and reviewing the employee compensation programs, whether the programs encourage
unnecessary or excessive risk taking. The Company, after reviewing and discussing the compensation programs with the Compensation
and Audit Committees of the Board, believes that the programs are balanced and do not motivate or encourage unnecessary or excessive
risk taking. Base salaries are fixed in amount and thus do not encourage risk taking. While the performance-based awards focus
on achievement of short-term or annual goals, and short-term goals may encourage the taking of short-term risks at the expense
of long-term results, the Company’s performance-based award programs represent a small percentage of total compensation
opportunities and results are closely monitored at both management and board levels. The Company believes that the programs appropriately
balance risk and the desire to focus employees on specific short-term goals important to the Company’s success, and that
they do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking.
Compensation
provided to employees in the form of long-term equity awards through stock option grants are important to help further align employees’
interests with those of the Company’s stockholders. The Company believes that these awards do not encourage unnecessary
or excessive risk taking since the ultimate value of the awards is tied to the Company’s stock price, and since awards are
subject to long-term vesting schedules to help ensure that executives have significant value tied to long-term stock price performance.
More
details on the Company's corporate governance initiatives, including copies of its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and each
of the Committee charters can be found in the "Corporate Governance" section of the Company's web site at http://www.socketmobile.com/about-us/investor-relations/corporate-governance.
Policy
for Director Recommendations and Nominations
The
Nominating Committee considers candidates for Board membership suggested by Board members, management and the Company's stockholders.
It is the policy of the Nominating Committee to consider recommendations for candidates to the Board of Directors from stockholders
holding no less than five percent of the total outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock who have held such shares
continuously for at least 12 months prior to the date of the submission of the recommendation. The Nominating Committee will consider
persons recommended by the Company's stockholders in the same manner as nominees recommended by members of the Board of Directors
or management.
A
stockholder who desires to recommend a candidate for election to the Board of Directors should direct the recommendation in written
correspondence by letter to the Company, addressed to:
Chairman
of the Nominating Committee
c/o
Corporate Secretary
Socket
Mobile, Inc.
39700
Eureka Drive
Newark,
CA 94560
The
notice must include:
|
•
|
the
candidate's name and home and business contact information;
|
|
•
|
detailed
biographical data and relevant qualifications;
|
|
•
|
a
signed letter from the candidate confirming his or her willingness to serve;
|
|
•
|
information
regarding any relationships between the candidate and the Company within the last three
years; and
|
|
•
|
evidence
of the required ownership of Common Stock by the recommending stockholder(s).
|
In
addition, a stockholder may nominate a person directly for election to the Board of Directors at the annual meeting of the Company's
stockholders, provided the stockholder complies with the requirements set forth in the Company's bylaws and the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission related to stockholder proposals. The process for properly submitting a stockholder
proposal, including a proposal to nominate a person for election to the Board of Directors at an annual meeting, is described
on Page 2 in the section entitled "
Deadline for Receipt of Stockholder Proposals to be Included in the Company's Proxy
Materials
."
Where
the Nominating Committee has either identified a prospective nominee or determines that an additional or replacement director
is required, the Nominating Committee may take such measures that it considers appropriate in connection with its evaluation of
a director candidate, including candidate interviews, inquiry of the person or persons making the recommendation or nomination,
engagement of an outside search firm to gather additional information, or reliance on the knowledge of the members of the committee,
the Board of Directors or management. In its evaluation of director candidates, including the members of the Board of Directors
eligible for re-election, the Nominating Committee considers a number of factors, including the following:
|
•
|
The
current size and composition of the Board of Directors and the needs of the Board of
Directors and its various committees.
|
|
•
|
Such
factors as judgment, independence, character and integrity, area of expertise, diversity
of experience, length of service and potential conflicts of interest. The Nominating
Committee recognizes that diversity in these areas brings value to the collective impact
of the Board on the Company. The Company does not consider or make its recommendations
based on race, gender, religion, age, sexual orientation or other matters the Committee
deems not relevant to effective board service.
|
|
•
|
Such
other factors as the Nominating Committee may consider appropriate.
|
The
Nominating Committee has also specified the following minimum qualifications that it believes must be met by a nominee for a position
on the Board of Directors:
|
•
|
The
highest personal and professional ethics and integrity.
|
|
•
|
Proven
achievement and competence in the nominee's field, and the ability to exercise sound
business judgment.
|
|
•
|
Skills
complementary to those of the existing members of the Board of Directors.
|
|
•
|
The
ability to assist and support management and make significant contributions to the Company's
success.
|
|
•
|
An
understanding of the fiduciary responsibilities required of a member of the Board of
Directors, and the commitment of time and energy necessary to carry out those responsibilities
diligently.
|
In
connection with its evaluation, the Nominating Committee determines whether it will interview potential nominees. After completing
the evaluation and interview, the Nominating Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board of Directors as to the persons
who should be nominated, and the Board of the Directors determines the nominees after considering the recommendation and report
of the Nominating Committee.
The
Nominating Committee believes that the current nominees for director all meet the general criteria for board membership as described
in this section. In addition, each nominee brings particular strengths to the Board. For example, all incumbent directors have
a thorough knowledge and understanding of the Company. Mr. Bass also has extensive experience as a former chief executive officer
or senior manager in ten companies over the past 37 years in the fields of networking, semiconductors and computing platforms.
Mr. Sealey, who is retiring on completion of his current term, has well established credentials as a senior marketing executive
and marketing consultant, and is a college professor of marketing. Mr. Emery, who is retiring on completion of his current term,
has a strong background working in the healthcare industry with an emphasis on healthcare management systems. Messrs. Bass, Emery
and Sealey hold doctorate degrees in their respective fields. Mr. Mills has a strong engineering background and a history of innovative
leadership and understanding of the business mobility market. Mr. Dunlap is a certified public accountant (inactive), holds an
MBA in business administration and has more than 30 years of industry experience and 22 years with the Company, all as Chief Financial
Officer. Mr. Mills has more than 23 years of experience with the Company, the last 15 years as President and Chief Executive Officer.
Stockholder
Communications to Directors
Stockholders
may communicate directly with the members of the Board of Directors by sending an email to
socketboard@socketmobile.com
.
The Company's Secretary monitors these communications and ensures that summaries of all received messages are provided to the
Board of Directors at its regularly scheduled meetings or directly to the Chairman of the Board if the matter is deemed to be
urgent and to require the immediate attention of the Board. Where the nature of a communication warrants, Mr. Bass, Chairman of
the Board, may decide to obtain the more immediate attention of the appropriate committee of the Board of Directors or a non-management
director, or the Company's management or independent advisors, as appropriate. Mr. Bass also determines whether any response to
a stockholder communication is necessary or warranted and whether further action is required.
Director
Independence
In
January 2017, the Board of Directors undertook a review of the independence of its directors and considered whether any director
had a material relationship with the Company or its management that could compromise his ability to exercise independent judgment
in carrying out his responsibilities. Questions relating to director independence were included on the annual Directors and Officers
Questionnaire completed by each director and executive in February 2017. As a result of this review, the Board of Directors affirmatively
determined that all of the directors of the Company, with the exception of Mr. Mills, the Company's President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Mr. Dunlap, the Company’s Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, are independent of the Company
and its management under the corporate governance standards of the Nasdaq Market.
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics
The
Board of Directors has a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all employees, executive officers and directors
of the Company, including the Company's senior financial and other executive officers. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
is intended to deter wrongdoing and promote ethical conduct among the Company's directors, executive officers and employees. The
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Company's website at http://www.socketmobile.com/about-us/investor-relations/corporate-governance.
The Company will also post any amendments to or waivers from the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on its website. There were
no changes to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics during 2016.
REPORT
OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The
Board of Directors maintains an Audit Committee comprised of three of the Company's outside directors. The Audit Committee oversees
the Company's financial processes on behalf of the Board of Directors, although management has the primary responsibility for
preparing the financial statements and maintaining the Company's financial reporting process including the system of internal
controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed with management the audited financial statements
in the Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, including discussing
the quality of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, including the identification and assessment
of risks, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee has a written charter, a copy of which
is posted on the Company’s website at http://www.socketmobile.com/about-us/investor-relations/corporate-governance.
The
Audit Committee reviewed the 2016 financial statements with the Company's independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing
an opinion on the conformity of the financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, as well as their judgment
as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company's accounting principles. The Audit Committee also discussed such
other matters as the auditors are required to discuss with the Committee under generally accepted auditing standards, including
Auditing Standards No. 1301. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors the auditors' independence
from management and the Company, including the matters in the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors
required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountants’
communications with the audit committee concerning independence.
The
Audit Committee also discussed with the Company's independent auditors the overall scope and results of their audit of the financial
statements, including their review of internal controls. The Audit Committee met periodically with the independent auditors, with
and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of the Company's internal controls,
and the overall quality of the Company's financial reporting. The Audit Committee held one meeting with the auditors in regard
to their audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016. In addition, a meeting
among the members of the Audit Committee, the Company’s auditors and management was held each quarter during fiscal 2016
to review the Company’s quarterly financial reports prior to their issuance.
In
reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the
Board of Directors has concurred, that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Audit Committee also approved the appointment of Sadler, Gibb & Associates,
LLC as the Company's independent auditors for the years ended December 31, 2012 through 2016 and has recommended approval of the
stockholders for the year ending December 31, 2017.
The
foregoing report has been submitted by the undersigned in our capacity as members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
|
|
AUDIT
COMMITTEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlie
Bass
|
|
|
Charles
C. Emery, Jr.
|
Dated: April
21, 2017
|
|
Brenton
Earl MacDonald
|
OTHER
MATTERS
The
Company knows of no other matters to be submitted at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If any other matters properly come
before the 2017 Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy to vote the shares they
represent as the Board of Directors may recommend. It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting, regardless
of the number of shares that you hold. Please complete, date, execute and return, at your earliest convenience, the accompanying
proxy card in the envelope that has been enclosed or otherwise vote your shares via telephone or internet as available.
Dated: April
21, 2017
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
Socket Mobile (NASDAQ:SCKT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Socket Mobile (NASDAQ:SCKT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024