Quarterly Report (10-q)

Date : 11/17/2016 @ 5:28PM
Source : Edgar (US Regulatory)
Stock : Strikeforce Technologies, Inc. (PC) (SFOR)
Quote : 0.01375  -0.00025 (-1.79%) @ 4:13PM

Quarterly Report (10-q)

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

 

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

 

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

 

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)

 

WYOMING

 

000-55012

 

22-3827597

(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)

 

(Commission

file number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

1090 King Georges Post Road, Suite 603

Edison, NJ 08837

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(732) 661-9641

(Issuer’s telephone number)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

 

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

N/A

N/A

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

 

Common stock, $0.0001 par value

Title of Class

 

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such a shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  x No ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer

¨

Accelerated filer

¨

Non-accelerated filer

¨

Smaller reporting company

x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act. Yes ¨ No x  

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Class

 

Outstanding at November 17, 2016

Common stock, $0.0001 par value

 

2,318,676,386

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of preferred stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Class

 

Outstanding at November 17, 2016

Preferred stock, Series A, no par value

 

3

 

Class

 

Outstanding at November 17, 2016

Preferred stock, Series B, $0.10 par value

 

50,001

 

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format Yes ¨ No x

 

Documents Incorporated By Reference

None

 

 

 
 
 

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q FILING

SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Page
Number

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Information

3

 

Condensed Balance Sheets at September 30, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015

3

 

Condensed Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)

4

 

Condensed Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the Nine months ended September 30, 2016 (unaudited)

5

 

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)

6

 

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements for the Three and Nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)

7

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

19

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

32

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

32

 

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

33

Item 1A.

Risk Factors  

33

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

33

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

33

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

33

Item 5.

Other Information

33

Item 6.

Exhibits

34

 

SIGNATURES

36

 

EX-31.1

Management Certification

 

 

 

EX-32.1

Sarbanes-Oxley Act

 

 
2
 

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TO INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

2016

 

 

December 31,
2015

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$ 1,223,889

 

 

$ 37,153

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

269,845

 

 

 

18,524

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

11,781

 

 

 

4,732

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

 

1,505,515

 

 

 

60,409

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

3,401

 

 

 

4,184

 

Patents, net

 

 

14,369

 

 

 

15,910

 

Security deposit

 

 

8,684

 

 

 

8,684

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

$ 1,531,969

 

 

$ 89,187

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Convertible notes payable, net

 

$ 1,448,100

 

 

$ 2,263,695

 

Convertible notes payable - related parties

 

 

355,500

 

 

 

355,500

 

Current maturities of notes payable, net

 

 

1,791,824

 

 

 

2,452,791

 

Current maturities of notes payable - related parties

 

 

742,513

 

 

 

722,638

 

Accounts payable

 

 

465,010

 

 

 

1,295,829

 

Accrued expenses

 

 

5,751

 

 

 

13,368

 

Accrued interest (including $1,023,041 and $939,654 due to related parties, respectively)

 

 

3,878,959

 

 

 

3,921,004

 

Accrued salaries and payroll taxes

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,347,772

 

Derivative liabilities

 

 

256,654

 

 

 

989,019

 

Due to factor

 

 

209,192

 

 

 

209,192

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

9,153,503

 

 

 

13,570,808

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable, net of current maturities

 

 

-

 

 

 

222,991

 

Notes payable - related parties, net of current maturities

 

 

-

 

 

 

19,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

 

 

9,153,503

 

 

 

13,813,674

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' Deficit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series A Preferred stock, no par value; 100 shares authorized;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 shares issued and outstanding

 

 

987,000

 

 

 

987,000

 

Series B Preferred stock par value $0.10: 100,000,000 shares authorized;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50,001 and 175,338 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

17,534

 

Preferred stock series not designated par value $0.10: 10,000,000 shares authorized;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

none issued or outstanding

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Common stock par value $0.0001: 5,000,000,000 shares authorized;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,318,676,386 and 22,711,924 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

231,868

 

 

 

2,271

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

24,105,630

 

 

 

22,526,096

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(32,951,032 )

 

 

(37,257,388 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Stockholders' Deficit

 

 

(7,621,534 )

 

 

(13,724,487 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit

 

$ 1,531,969

 

 

$ 89,187

 

 

See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements

 

 
3
Table of Contents

 

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended

 

 

For the Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

September 30,

2016

 

 

September 30,
2015

 

 

September 30,

2016

 

 

September 30,

2015

 

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

 

$ 183,029

 

 

$ 76,371

 

 

$ 392,628

 

 

$ 221,109

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of revenue

 

 

 

888

 

 

 

2,228

 

 

 

4,852

 

 

 

6,215

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross margin

 

 

 

182,141

 

 

 

74,143

 

 

 

387,776

 

 

 

214,894

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation

 

 

 

124,282

 

 

 

82,756

 

 

 

345,000

 

 

 

253,238

 

Professional fees

 

 

 

45,883

 

 

 

93,691

 

 

 

521,742

 

 

 

396,773

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

 

312,896

 

 

 

49,235

 

 

 

558,456

 

 

 

234,521

 

Research and development

 

 

 

125,654

 

 

 

64,223

 

 

 

378,874

 

 

 

189,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

 

608,715

 

 

 

289,905

 

 

 

1,804,072

 

 

 

1,074,282

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from operations

 

 

 

(426,574 )

 

 

(215,762 )

 

 

(1,416,296 )

 

 

(859,388 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Litigation settlement

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

9,750,000

 

 

 

-

 

Fees related to litigation settlement

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(4,187,257 )

 

 

-

 

Interest and financing expense

 

 

 

(95,481 )

 

 

(286,342 )

 

 

(1,022,178 )

 

 

(582,684 )

Debt discount amortization

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(34,293 )

 

 

-

 

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities

 

 

 

23,776

 

 

 

111,854

 

 

 

96,765

 

 

 

871,246

 

Extinguishment of derivative liabilities

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

635,600

 

 

 

-

 

Forgiveness of debt

 

 

 

180,587

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

485,372

 

 

 

-

 

Other income (expense)

 

 

 

181

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(1,357 )

 

 

305,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense), net

 

 

 

109,063

 

 

 

(174,488 )

 

 

5,722,652

 

 

 

593,562

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

$ (317,511 )

 

$ (390,250 )

 

$ 4,306,356

 

 

$ (265,826 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per common share - basic and diluted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-Basic

 

 

$ -

 

 

$ (0.15 )

 

$ -

 

 

$ (0.26 )
-Diluted

 

 

$ -

 

 

$ (0.15 )

 

$ -

 

 

$ (0.26 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-Basic

 

 

 

2,284,590,677

 

 

 

2,521,228

 

 

 

1,699,727,344

 

 

 

1,021,505

 

-Diluted

 

 

 

2,284,590,677

 

 

 

2,521,228

 

 

 

1,700,489,249

 

 

 

1,021,505

 

 

See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements 

 

 
4
Table of Contents

 

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series A Preferred stock,
no par value

 

 

Series B Preferred stock,
par value $0.10

 

 

Common stock,
par value $0.0001

 

 

Additional

Paid-in

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Total

Stockholders'

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Amount

 

 

Capital

 

 

Deficit

 

 

Deficit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at January 1, 2016

 

 

3

 

 

$ 987,000

 

 

 

175,338

 

 

$ 17,534

 

 

 

22,711,924

 

 

$ 2,271

 

 

$ 22,526,096

 

 

$ (37,257,388 )

 

$ (13,724,487 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of common stock issued for services

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

154,897,500

 

 

 

15,490

 

 

 

170,548

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

186,038

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of vested options

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

269,250

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

269,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued upon conversion of notes and interest

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,105,237,983

 

 

 

210,525

 

 

 

368,509

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

579,034

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued upon conversion of Series B preferred stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(125,337 )

 

 

(12,534 )

 

 

35,703,979

 

 

 

3,570

 

 

 

8,964

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued upon exercise of warrants

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

125,000

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

(12 )

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Forgiveness of accrued officers salaries recorded as capital contribution

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

762,275

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

762,275

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,306,356

 

 

 

4,306,356

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2016 (Unaudited)

 

 

3

 

 

$ 987,000

 

 

 

50,001

 

 

$ 5,000

 

 

 

2,318,676,386

 

 

$ 231,868

 

 

$ 24,105,630

 

 

$ (32,951,032 )

 

$ (7,621,534 )

 

See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements 

 

 
5
Table of Contents

 

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Nine
Months

 

 

For the Nine
Months

 

 

 

Ended

 

 

Ended

 

 

 

September 30,
2016

 

 

September 30,
2015

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$ 4,306,356

 

 

$ (265,826 )

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

3,823

 

 

 

5,985

 

Amortization of discount on notes payable

 

 

34,293

 

 

 

154,127

 

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities

 

 

(96,765 )

 

 

(871,246 )

Extinguishment of derivative liabilities

 

 

(635,600 )

 

 

-

 

Common stock issued upon conversion of notes and interest

 

 

386,351

 

 

 

-

 

Forgiveness of debt

 

 

(485,372 )

 

 

-

 

Fair value of common stock issued for services

 

 

186,037

 

 

 

2,083

 

Fair value of vested options

 

 

269,250

 

 

 

146

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(251,321 )

 

 

17,102

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

(7,049 )

 

 

7,548

 

Accounts payable

 

 

(416,600 )

 

 

(55,571 )

Accrued expenses

 

 

(7,616 )

 

 

412,961

 

Accrued interest

 

 

78,668

 

 

 

-

 

Accrued salaries and payroll taxes

 

 

(585,497 )

 

 

-

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

 

2,778,958

 

 

 

(592,691 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property and equipment

 

 

(1,499 )

 

 

(1,500 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of Series B preferred stock

 

 

-

 

 

 

25,000

 

Repayment of convertible notes payable

 

 

(686,738 )

 

 

(25,000 )

Repayment of notes payable

 

 

(978,985 )

 

 

(24,822 )

Proceeds from convertible notes payable

 

 

-

 

 

 

67,000

 

Proceeds from notes payable

 

 

75,000

 

 

 

579,000

 

Proceeds from notes payable - related parties

 

 

-

 

 

 

19,875

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

 

(1,590,723 )

 

 

641,053

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase in cash

 

 

1,186,736

 

 

 

46,862

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash at beginning of the period

 

 

37,153

 

 

 

13,129

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash at end of the period

 

$ 1,223,889

 

 

$ 59,991

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$ 223,973

 

 

$ -

 

Income tax paid

 

$ -

 

 

$ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued for conversion of debt and accrued and premium interest

 

$ 192,683

 

 

$ 206,363

 

Forgiveness of accrued officers salaries recorded as capital contribution

 

$ 762,275

 

 

$ -

 

Common stock issued for exercise of warrants

 

$ 12

 

 

$ 1,395

 

Preferred stock discount due to convertible feature

 

$ -

 

 

$ 2,665

 

Debt discount due to convertible feature

 

$ -

 

 

$ 66,583

 

Reclassification of derivative liability to equity

 

$ -

 

 

$ 293,593

 

Issuance of Series B preferred stock in connection with secured notes payable

 

$ -

 

 

$ 25,001

 

Common stock issued for conversion of Series B preferred stock

 

$ 12,534

 

 

$ -

 

 

See accompanying notes to the condensed financial statements 

 

 
6
Table of Contents


StrikeForce Technologies, Inc.

Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

StrikeForce Technical Services Corporation was incorporated in August 2001 under the laws of the State of New Jersey. On September 3, 2004, the Company changed its name to StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”). On November 15, 2010, the Company was re-domiciled under the laws of the State of Wyoming. The Company’s operations are based in Edison, New Jersey.

 

The Company is a software development and services company that offers a suite of integrated computer network security products using proprietary technology. In 2003, the Company acquired certain intellectual property rights and patent pending technology from NetLabs.com, Inc. (“NetLabs”) including the rights to further develop and sell their principal technology. In addition, certain officers of NetLabs joined our company as officers and directors of the Company. The Company’s ongoing strategy is developing and marketing its suite of network security products to the corporate, financial, healthcare, legal, government, technology, insurance, e-commerce and consumer sectors.

 

Liquidity and Going Concern

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred a loss from operations of $1,416,296 and at September 30, 2016, the Company had a stockholders’ deficit of $7,621,534. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In addition, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its report on the Company’s December 31, 2015 financial statements, has raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

 

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to continue to implement its business plan. Currently, management is attempting to increase revenues and improve gross margins by redirecting its sales focus from direct sales to domestic and international sales channels, primarily selling through a channel of distributors, value added resellers, strategic partners and original equipment manufacturers. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to increase revenues, there can be no assurances to that effect. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to continually increase its customer base and realize increased revenues from recently signed contracts. No assurance can be given that any future financing, if needed, will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, if needed, it may contain undue restrictions on its operations, in the case of debt financing, or cause substantial dilution for its stock holders, in the case of equity financing.

 

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

 

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods have been included. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 and notes thereto contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 14, 2016.

 

Reverse Stock Splits

 

In March 2014, the Company effected a 1:1,500 reverse stock split of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock. 

 

In February 2015, the Company effected a 1:650 reverse stock split of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

 

In August 2015, the Company effected a 1:1,000 reverse stock split of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

 

All share and per share amounts have been adjusted, on a retroactive basis, to reflect the reverse stock splits adopted by the Company as if the reverses stock splits had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented.

 

 
7
Table of Contents

 

Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include those related to accounting for potential liabilities and the assumptions made in valuing stock instruments issued for services and derivative liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Revenue

 

The Company recognizes revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer and there are no significant uncertainties surrounding acceptance by the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed and determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. When the Company recognizes revenue, no provisions are made for returns because, historically, there have been very few sales returns and adjustments that have impacted the ultimate collection of revenues.

 

Revenue from hardware sales is recognized when the product is shipped to the customer and there are either no unfulfilled obligations by the Company, or any obligations that will not affect the customer's final acceptance of the arrangement. All costs of these obligations are accrued when the corresponding revenue is recognized.

 

Revenue from time and service contracts is recognized as the services are provided. Revenue from delivered elements of one-time charge licensed software is recognized at the inception of the license term, provided we have vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of each delivered element. Revenue is deferred for undelivered elements. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of software licenses when the four criteria discussed above are met. If the Company determines that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, it defers the fee and recognizes revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash. Revenue from monthly software licenses is recognized on a subscription basis.

 

The Company offers an Application Service Provider (ASP) hosted cloud service whereby customer usage transactions are invoiced monthly on a cost per transaction basis.

 

Stock Compensation

 

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) whereas the value of the award is measured on the date of grant and recognized as compensation expense on the straight-line basis over the vesting period. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with the authoritative guidance of the FASB whereas the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Options granted to non-employees are revalued each reporting period to determine the amount to be recorded as an expense in the respective period. As the options vest, they are valued on each vesting date and an adjustment is recorded for the difference between the value already recorded and the then current value on the date of vesting. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the measurement date.

 

 
8
Table of Contents

 

The fair value of the Company’s stock option and warrant grants are estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the stock options or warrants, and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model, and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model could materially affect compensation expense recorded in future periods.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

 

The Company evaluates its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

 

To determine the number of authorized but unissued shares available to satisfy outstanding convertible securities, the Company uses a sequencing method to prioritize its convertible securities as prescribed by ASC 815-40-35. At each reporting date, the Company reviews its convertible securities to determine that their classification is appropriate.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The Company follows the authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) for fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A fair value hierarchy was established, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad levels as follows:

 

Level 1-Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2-Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly.

Level 3-Unobservable inputs based on the Company's assumptions.

 

The Company is required to use of observable market data if such data is available without undue cost and effort.

 

As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company’s balance sheets included the fair value of derivative liabilities of $256,654 and $989,019, respectively, which were based on Level 2 measurements. 

 

The recorded amounts for accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, convertible notes, and notes payables approximate their fair value due to their short term nature.

   

 
9
Table of Contents

 

Income (loss) per Share

 

Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution, using the treasury stock method that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the income (loss) of the Company. In computing diluted income (loss) per share, the treasury stock method assumes that outstanding options, warrants, and convertible preferred stock are exercised and the proceeds are used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Options, warrants, and convertible preferred stock may have a dilutive effect under the treasury stock method only when the average market price of the common stock during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options and warrants.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the dilutive impact of outstanding stock options for 197,000,001 shares and 1,000,001 shares, respectively; outstanding warrants for 0 shares and 30 shares, respectively; preferred stock that can convert into 14,097,838 shares and 32,875,063 shares of our common stock, respectively, and notes payable that can convert into 25 shares and 432,232 shares of our common stock, respectively, have been excluded because their impact on the loss per share is anti-dilutive.

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the dilutive impact of outstanding stock options for 1,000,001 shares, outstanding warrants for 30 shares, preferred stock that can convert into 32,875,063 shares of our common stock and notes payable that can convert into 432,232 shares of our common stock have been excluded because their impact on the loss per share is anti-dilutive.

 

The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:

 

 

 

Nine months ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Income (Loss) per share - Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) for the period

 

$ 4,306,356

 

 

$ (265,826 )

Basic average common stock outstanding

 

 

1,699,727,344

 

 

 

1,021,505

 

Net earnings/(loss) per share

 

$ -

 

 

$ (0.26 )

 

 

 

Nine months ended
September 30,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

Income (Loss) per share - Diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (Loss) for the period

 

$ 4,306,356

 

 

$ (265,826 )

Basic average common stock outstanding

 

 

1,699,727,344

 

 

 

1,021,505

 

Diluted effect of outstanding stock options, warrants, notes and preferred stock

 

 

761,905

 

 

 

-

 

Diluted average common stock outstanding

 

 

1,700,489,249

 

 

 

1,021,505

 

Net earnings/(loss) per share

 

$ -

 

 

$ (0.26 )

 

 
10
Table of Contents

 

Significant Concentrations

 

For the interim period ended September 30, 2016, sales to three customers comprised 45%, 29% and 12% of revenues, respectively. For the interim period ended September 30, 2015, sales to one customer comprised 64% of revenues. At September 30, 2016, two customers comprised 65%, and 16% of accounts receivable, respectively.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. The ASU also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted only in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. Entities will be able to transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

 

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. ASU 2014-15 requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the expected impact that the standard could have on its financial statements and related disclosures.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to record a right of use asset and a corresponding lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for all interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-02 on the Company’s financial statements and disclosures.

 

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statement presentation or disclosures.

 

 
11
Table of Contents

 

Note 2 - Convertible Notes Payable

 

Convertible notes payable consisted of the following:

 

 

 

September 30,
2016

 

 

December 31,

2015

 

Secured

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a) DART

 

$ 542,588

 

 

$ 542,588

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(b) Convertible notes with fixed conversion features

 

 

905,512

 

 

 

910,512

 

(c) Convertible notes with adjustable conversion features

 

 

-

 

 

 

824,861

 

Total convertible notes

 

 

1,448,100

 

 

 

2,277,961

 

Discount on convertible notes

 

 

-

 

 

 

(14,266 )

Convertible notes

 

$ 1,448,100

 

 

$ 2,263,695

 

 

(a) At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $542,588 of notes payables are due to DART/Citco Global. The notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock based on adjustable conversion prices, are secured by all of the Company’s assets, and are currently in default. The adjustable conversion feature of the notes are accounted for as derivative liabilities (see Note 6). DART/Citco Global did not process any conversions of notes into shares of common stock in fiscal 2016 or 2015. The Company has been in contact with the note holder who has indicated that it has no present intention of exercising its right to convert the debentures into shares of the Company's common stock. Under the terms of the secured debentures, we are restricted in our ability to issue additional securities as long as any portion of the principal or interest on the secured debentures remains outstanding. During 2016 or 2015, we did not obtain DART/Citco Global’s written consent related to any of our financing agreements.

 

 

(b) Convertible notes payable consisted of thirteen unsecured convertible notes convertible at a fixed amount (”fixed convertible notes”) into 13 shares of the Company’s common stock, at fixed prices ranging from $1,950,000 to $9,750,000,000 per share, as defined in the agreements. The notes bear interest at 0% to 18% per annum, and were due in various dates through 2015. All of the fixed convertible notes are currently in default and the Company is pursuing settlements with certain of the holders.

 

 

At December 31, 2015, the balance of the accrued interest on the fixed convertible notes was $932,272. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, interest expense of $60,320 was recorded, and at September 30, 2016, the balance of accrued interest on the fixed convertible notes was $966,419.

 

 

(c) At December 31, 2015, the balance of the convertible notes with adjustable conversion features (“adjustable convertible notes”) was $824,861. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, the Company repaid $681,738 of note principal, and note holders converted $143,123 of note principal into shares of the Company’s common stock. At September 30, 2016, the balance of adjustable convertible notes was $0.

 

 

 

At December 31, 2015, the balance of the accrued interest on the adjustable convertible notes was $298,235. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, the Company paid $189,443 of accrued interest, and note holders converted $49,560 of accrued interest into shares of common stock. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, interest expense of $13,278 was accrued, and $71,153 was forgiven and written-off. At September 30, 2016, the balance of accrued interest on adjustable convertible notes was $1,357.

 

 

 

At the option of the holder, the adjustable convertible notes were convertible into shares of common stock of the Company at a price per share discount of 40% of the Company’s common stock trading market price during a certain time period. The Company determined that the conversion feature of the notes were not fixed, and recorded them as a derivative liability. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, the payment and conversion of the convertible notes resulted in the Company recording a gain of $635,600 related to the extinguishment of the corresponding derivative liability (see Note 6).

  

At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, accrued interest due for all convertible notes was $967,776 and $1,230,507, respectively, and is included in accrued interest in the accompanying balance sheets. Interest expense for all convertible notes payable for the interim periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $73,598 and $161,756, respectively.

 

 
12
Table of Contents

  

Note 3 - Convertible Notes Payable - Related Parties

 

Convertible notes payable - related parties consisted of twelve unsecured convertible notes payable. Six notes totaling $268,000 are due to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, at a compounded interest rate of 8% per annum; two notes totaling $57,000 are due to the Company’s VP of Technology, interest at prime plus 2% and prime plus 4% per annum; and four notes totaling $30,000 are due to the spouse of the Company’s Chief Technology Officer at a compounded interest rate of 8% per annum. All of the notes are convertible at a fixed conversion price of $9,750,000,000 per share, as defined in the agreements, and have extended due dates of December 31, 2016. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the balance of the outstanding convertible notes payable - related parties was $355,500, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2015, accrued interest due for the convertible notes - related parties was $391,001. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, interest of $41,289 was accrued and at September 30, 2016, accrued interest due on convertible notes payable - related parties was $432,290.

 

Note 4 - Notes Payable

 

Notes payable consisted of the following:

 

 

 

September 30,
2016

 

 

December 31,

2015

 

Secured

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a) H. Group Partners, Inc.

 

$ -

 

 

$ 310,000

 

(b) Promissory note - factoring

 

 

-

 

 

 

35,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(c) Promissory notes

 

 

446,824

 

 

 

875,609

 

(d) Promissory notes - StrikeForce Investor Group

 

 

1,345,000

 

 

 

1,475,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total notes payable

 

 

1,791,824

 

 

 

2,695,809

 

Discount on secured notes payable

 

 

-

 

 

 

(20,027 )

Notes payable, net of discount

 

 

1,791,824

 

 

 

2,675,782

 

Long-term portion

 

 

-

 

 

 

(222,991 )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Promissory notes, current maturities

 

$ 1,791,824

 

 

$ 2,452,791

 

 

(a) In May 2015, the Company executed a secured promissory note with an unrelated party for $310,000, bearing interest at 10% per annum maturing through March 31, 2018. The note was secured by the Company's intellectual property, accounts, fixtures and property. As an inducement to make the loan, the note holder received 16,667 shares Series B preferred stock at $1.50 per share that are convertible into shares of the Company's common stock at a 30% discount to current market value, as defined. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, the Company repaid $310,000 of note principal, $23,611 of accrued interest, and $204,560 of additional interest was paid to the note holder.

 

 

(b) In October 2015, the Company entered into a promissory note agreement for $50,400, secured by all accounts, chattel paper, equipment, general intangibles, instruments and inventory, as defined in the agreement. As December 31, 2015, the balance of the note was $35,200. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, the Company had repaid the balance of $35,200.

 

 

(c) Notes payable consists of various unsecured promissory notes with interest up to 10% per annum. As of September 30, 2016, notes aggregating $397,500 were in default, and the notes carry default interest rates up to 14% per annum. The Company is currently pursuing settlements with certain of the note holders. As of December 31, 2015, the balance due under these notes was $875,609. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note for $75,000 to Cyber Safety (see Note 12). Also during the period, the Company paid off note principal totaling $503,785. At September 30, 2016, the balance due under these notes was $446,824.

 

 

 

At December 31, 2015, the balance of the accrued interest on the notes payable-various was $438,782. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, $37,001 of accrued interest was recorded, and at September 30, 2016, accrued interest on the notes payable-various was $472,619.

 

 
13
Table of Contents

  

(d) Notes payable to unsecured investors, interest at 10% per annum, originally due in 2011, and currently in default. At December 31, 2015, the balance of notes payable-investors was $1,475,000. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, the Company repaid $130,000 of principal and at September 30, 2016, the balance of notes payable-investors was $1,345,000. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, two note holders assigned delinquent notes totaling $150,000, to two unrelated parties, who agreed to extend payment of the two notes to April 2017. The Company is currently pursuing extensions on all of the remaining notes.

 

 

 

At December 31, 2015, the balance of the accrued interest on the notes payable-investors was $1,293,092. During the interim period ended September 30, 2016, $108,664 of accrued interest was recorded, and at September 30, 2016, accrued interest on the notes payable-investors was $1,401,757.

  

At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, accrued interest due for all notes payable above was $1,874,736 and $1,731,874, respectively, and is included in accrued interest in the accompanying balance sheets. Interest expense for notes payable for the interim periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $169,276 and $143,943, respectively.

 

Note 5 - Notes Payable - Related Party

 

Notes payable- related party consist of eighteen unsecured notes payable to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer ranging in interest rates of 0% per annum to 10% per annum. The notes have extended due dates of December 31, 2016, with the exception of one note for $19,875 due in January 2017, and all are shown as current liabilities. The balance of the outstanding notes payable - related party was $742,513 and $742,513 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

 

At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, accrued interest due for the notes - related party was $590,751 and $548,653, respectively, and is included in accrued interest in the accompanying balance sheets. Interest expense for notes payable - related parties for the interim periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $42,098 and $41,945, respectively.

 

Note 6 - Derivative Financial Instruments

 

Under authoritative guidance issued by the FASB, instruments which do not have fixed settlement provisions, are deemed to be derivative instruments. The conversion feature of certain of the Company’s convertible notes payable (see Note 2) did not have fixed settlement provisions because the ultimate determination of shares to be issued could exceed current available authorized shares.

 

In accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, the conversion feature of the financial instruments was separated from the host contract and recognized as a derivative instrument. The conversion feature of the financial instruments has been characterized as a derivative liability and was re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value reported in the statement of operations.

 

The derivative liability was valued at the following dates using a probability weighted Black-Scholes-Merton model with the following assumptions:

 

 

 

September 30,
2016

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

Conversion feature:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

0.16 %

 

 

0.16 %

Expected volatility

 

 

75 %

 

 

100 %

Expected life (in years)

 

1 year

 

 

.25 to 5 years

 

Expected dividend yield

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion feature

 

$ 256,654

 

 

$ 989,019

 

 

The risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by the Federal Reserve Bank. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of a group of comparable public companies. The expected life of the conversion feature of the notes was based on the remaining terms of the related notes. The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has not customarily paid dividends to its common stockholders in the past and does not expect to pay dividends to its common stockholders in the future.

 

At December 31, 2015, the balance of the derivative liabilities was $989,019. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, convertible notes and accrued interest totaling $1,087,707 were converted into shares of common stock or paid off in cash, and the Company recorded a gain of $635,600 related to the extinguishment of the corresponding derivative liabilities. Also during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a change in fair value of derivatives of $96,765. At September 30, 2016, the balance of the derivative liabilities was $256,654.

 

 
14
Table of Contents

 

Note 7 - Stockholders’ Deficit

 

Common Stock

 

During the nine month period ended September 30, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,295,964,462 shares of its common stock as follows:

 

· Convertible note holders converted $143,123 of principal, $49,560 of accrued interest and $386,352 of additional interest, or a total of $579,035, into 2,105,237,983 shares of common stock at conversion prices ranging from $0.000058 to $0.0008 per share.
· Four holders of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock converted 125,337 Series B Preferred shares into 35,703,979 shares of the Company’s common stock at conversion prices ranging from $0.00383 to $0.00532 per share.
· An investor processed a cashless exercise of 30 warrant shares into 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The investor received an additional 154,875,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as modification consideration, valued at $185,850, and recorded as the fair value of shares issued for services in general and administrative expenses.
· The Company issued 22,500 shares of common stock for services, valued at $188.

 

Capital Contribution

 

In January 2016, the Company’s officers forgave an aggregate total of $762,275 of accrued payroll due to them from the Company. The Company recorded the forgiveness of accrued payroll as a capital contribution.

 

Note 8 - Warrants

 

The table below summarizes the Company’s warrant activities at September 30, 2016:

 

 

 

Number of

Warrant Shares

 

 

Exercise Price Range

Per Share

 

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

 

Fair Value
at Date
of Issuance

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

 

 

30

 

 

$

695,000 - 9,750,000,000

 

 

$ 10,430,000

 

 

$ 509,262

 

 

$ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$ -

 

Canceled

 

(-

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(30 )

 

$ 0.00024

 

 

$ 8,382,915

 

 

 

(103,969 )

 

 

-

 

Expired

 

(-

 

$

29,250,000 - 9,750,000,000

 

 

$ 29,886,738

 

 

$ (405,293 )

 

$ -

 

Balance, September 30, 2016

 

 

-

 

 

$ -

 

 

$ -

 

 

$ -

 

 

$ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested and exercisable, September 30, 2016

 

 

-

 

 

$ -

 

 

$ -

 

 

$ -

 

 

$ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unvested, September 30, 2016

 

 

-

 

 

$ -

 

 

$ -

 

 

$ -

 

 

$ -

 

 

In April 2016, the Company executed a settlement agreement with an investor relating to outstanding warrant agreements issued in conjunction with convertible notes that were repaid by the Company in January 2016. Per the terms of the settlement, the investor processed a cashless exercise of 30 warrant shares into 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $150, and recorded as financing expense. The investor received an additional 154,875,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as modification consideration, valued at $185,850, and recorded in general and administrative expenses on the accompanying statement of operations.

 

 
15
Table of Contents

  

Note 9 - Options

 

In November 2012, the stockholders approved the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan effective January 3, 2013. The number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan was 100,000,000.The number of shares authorized for issuance under the Incentive Plan was increased to 200,000,000 in September 2016 by unanimous consent of the Board of Directors.

 

In August 2015, the Company awarded options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to an unrelated consultant, exercisable at $0.0005 per share.

 

In September 2016, the Company awarded options to purchase 196,000,000 shares of its common stock to its management team and employees, exercisable at $0.00625 per share, expiring ten (10) years from the date of grant and vesting over a six-month period.

 

Fair value of vested options was $269,250 in the interim period ended September 30, 2016, and included as part of operating expenses on the statement of operations.

 

The table below summarizes the Company’s 2004 Incentive Plan and 2012 Stock Incentive Plan activities through September 30, 2016:

 

 

 

Number of

Options Shares

 

 

Exercise Price Range

Per Share

 

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

 

Fair Value at Date of Issuance

 

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

 

 

1,000,003

 

 

$

0.0005 - 9,750,000,000

 

 

$ 2.00

 

 

$ 2,785,163

 

 

$ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

 

196,000,000

 

 

$ 0.00625

 

 

$ 0.00625

 

 

$ 1,568,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expired

 

 

(2 )

 

$ 9,750,000

 

 

$ 9,750,000

 

 

$ (506,697 )

 

$ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, September 30, 2016

 

 

197,000,001

 

 

$

0.0005 - 975,000,000

 

 

$ 0.00625

 

 

$ 3,846,466

 

 

$ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vested and exercisable, September 30, 2016

 

 

33,666,668

 

 

$

0.0005 -975,000,000

 

 

$ 0.005

 

 

$ 2,539,799

 

 

$ -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unvested, September 30, 2016

 

 

163,333,333

 

 

$ 0.00625

 

 

$ 0.00625

 

 

$ 1,306,667

 

 

$ -

 

 

As of September 30, 2016, options to purchase an aggregate of 197,000,001 shares of common stock were outstanding under the 2004 incentive plan and 2012 Stock Incentive Plan and there were 9,500,000 shares remaining available for issuance. At September 30, 2016, the intrinsic value of outstanding options was zero.

 

 
16
Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes information concerning 2004 Incentive plan and 2012 Stock Incentive Plan as of September 30, 2016:

 

 

 

 

Options Outstanding

 

 

Options Exercisable

 

Range of Exercise Prices

 

 

Number Outstanding

 

 

Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)

 

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

 

Number

Exercisable

 

 

Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)

 

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

975,000,000

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1.00

 

 

$ 975,000,000

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1.00

 

 

$ 975,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.00625

 

 

 

196,000,000

 

 

 

10.00

 

 

$ 0.00625

 

 

 

32,666,667

 

 

 

10.00

 

 

$ 0.00625

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.0005

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

1.30

 

 

$ 0.0005

 

 

 

1,000,000

 

 

 

1.30

 

 

$ 0.0005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

0.0005 - 975,000

 

 

 

197,000,001

 

 

 

4.10

 

 

$ 0.00625

 

 

 

33,666,668

 

 

 

4.10

 

 

$ 0.00625

 

 

Note 10 - Other Income

 

On March 28, 2013 the Company initiated patent litigation against an outside party. In March 2015, the case was in full discovery, the pre-trial hearing was held, and the deliberations were continuing. Mediation took place in May 2015 to discuss a potential settlement, and on January 15, 2016, the parties reached a settlement in the matter. As part of the settlement, the Company received a payment in January 2016 of $9,750,000 and incurred fees related to the settlement of $4,187,257.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company wrote off $414,219 of trade payables, recorded as forgiveness of debt, that were aged over ten years. Additionally, accrued interest of $71,153 was forgiven and written-off (see Note 2).

 

In March 2015 the Company entered into a settlement agreement relating to a lawsuit with a former channel partner for $412,500 which was recorded as other income. In the period ended September 30, 2015, the Company and the former channel partner amended the settlement agreement and reduced the total settlement to $305,000.

 

Note 11- Income Taxes

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized net income of $4,306,356 and net loss of ($265,826), respectively. The Company did not record any provision for income taxes because the net income for these periods was offset by available net operating losses of approximately $18.9 million and $18.1 million, respectively.

 

In accordance with guidance of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740, Income Taxes, the Company evaluates its deferred tax assets to determine if a valuation allowance is required based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard, with significant weight being given to evidence that can be objectively verified. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and severity of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability; the length of statutory carryover periods for operating losses and tax credit carryovers; and available tax planning alternatives. Our deferred tax assets are composed primarily of U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards and temporary differences related to stock based compensation. Based on available objective evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets are not recognizable and will not be recognizable until its determined that we have sufficient taxable income. We may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. ASC 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods, and disclosures. As of September 30, 2016, the Company does not have any liabilities for unrecognized tax uncertainties.

 

 
17
Table of Contents

  

Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies

 

Asset Sale and Licensing Agreement

 

On August 24, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Cyber Safety, Inc., a New York corporation (“Cyber Safety”) for Cyber Safety to license, and retain an option to purchase, the patents and Intellectual Property related to the GuardedID Ò and MobileTrust Ò software. In conjunction with the licensing and the option to purchase, Cyber Safety loaned the Company $408,000 in 2015 and $75,000 (see Note 4) in 2016. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, $450,000 was repaid to Cyber Safety, and at September 30, 2016, $33,000 is outstanding.

 

Cyber Safety has the option to buy our GuardedID Ò patent for $9,000,000 that expires on September 30, 2020. At September 30, 2016, the Company does not have an estimate if Cyber Safety will exercise its option to make the purchase. Cyber Safety will also resell our GuardedID Ò and MobileTrust Ò products, for which we will receive a royalty, while we retain an unlimited license to resell those products.

 

As a condition of the asset purchase agreement, Cyber Safety will license the Malware Suite (as defined in the Asset Purchase Agreement) up to and until September 30, 2020. Pursuant to this license, Cyber Safety shall pay the Company 15% of the net amount Cyber Safety receives, as defined, which amount may be increased to 20% under certain conditions for ProtectIDÒ, and is subject to reduction for commissions and support costs that Cyber Safety will be obligated to pay to the Company.

 

In March 2016, Advanced Cyber, a subsidiary of Cyber Safety, agreed to pay the Company $25,000 per month as a license fee in conjunction with Company’s agreements with Cyber Safety. Included in revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 is $75,000 and $175,000, respectively, of license revenue from Advanced Cyber. At September 30, 2016, the total license fee receivable due from Advanced Cyber was $175,000.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

On June 20, 2016, the Company initiated additional patent litigation against three major competitors in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in Newark, for infringement of United States Patent No. 8,484,698. This litigation is ongoing.

 

Due to Factor

 

In March 2007, the Company entered into a sale and subordination agreement with a factoring firm whereby the Company sold its rights to two invoices, from February 2007 and March 2007, totaling $470,200 to the factor. Upon signing the agreement and providing the required disclosures, the factor remitted $197,450 to the Company. By December 31, 2007, the two invoice were deemed uncollectible. In February 2008, the Company agreed to pay the factor a settlement of $75,000 in September 2008, unless both parties mutually agreed to extend the due date. In September 2008, the Company and the factor reached a verbal agreement to extend the due date to December 31, 2008. The Company is currently pursuing a further extension. As of September 30, 2016, the balance due to the factor by the Company was $209,192 including interest.

 

 
18
Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

 

Included in this interim report are "forward-looking" statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA") as well as historical information. Some of our statements under "Business”, "Properties”, "Legal Proceedings”, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”," the Notes to Financial Statements” and elsewhere in this report constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including matters described in the section titled "Risk Factors." Forward-looking statements include those that use forward-looking terminology, such as the words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "project," "plan," "will," "shall," "should," and similar expressions, including when used in the negative. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable and achievable, these statements involve risks and uncertainties and we cannot assure you that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. We claim the protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the PSLRA.

 

Such risks include, among others, the following: international, national and local general economic and market conditions: our ability to sustain, manage or forecast our growth; material costs and availability; new product development and introduction; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; adverse publicity; competition; the loss of significant customers or suppliers; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results; changes in business strategy or development plans; business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the ability to protect technology; and other factors referenced in this filing.

 

Consequently, all the forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results anticipated by management will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to or effects on our business operations. We undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether to reflect events or circumstances after the date initially filed or published, to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or otherwise.

 

Unless otherwise noted, references in this Form 10-Q to “StrikeForce”, “we”, “us”, “our”, “SFT”, “our company”, and the “Company” means StrikeForce Technologies, Inc., a Wyoming corporation.

 

 
19
Table of Contents

 

Background

 

We are a software development and services company that offers a suite of integrated computer network security products using proprietary technology. StrikeForce Technical Services Corporation was incorporated in August 2001 under the laws of the State of New Jersey. On September 3, 2004, we changed our name to StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. On November 15, 2010, we re-domiciled under the laws of the State of Wyoming. We initially conducted operations as an integrator and reseller of computer hardware and telecommunications equipment and services until December 2002. In December 2002, and formally memorialized in September 2003, we acquired certain intellectual property rights and patent pending technology from NetLabs.com, Inc. (“NetLabs”) including the rights to further develop and sell their principal technology. In addition, certain officers of NetLabs joined our company as officers and directors of our company. Our ongoing strategy is developing and marketing our suite of network security products to the corporate, financial, healthcare, legal, government, technology, insurance, e-commerce and consumer sectors. We plan to continue to grow our business primarily through our globally expanding sales channel and internally generated sales, rather than by acquisitions. We have no subsidiaries and we conduct our operations from our corporate office in Edison, New Jersey.

 

We completed the development of our ProtectID Ò platform at the end of June 2006. We completed the core development of our keyboard encryption and anti-keylogger product, GuardedID Ò , in December 2006 and commenced deployment of our new mobile product, MobileTrust Ò into the mobile stores in 2014. The products are currently being sold and distributed. ProtectID Ò patent titled "Multi-Channel Device Utilizing a Centralized Out-of-Band Authentication System" is now protected by three patents. The keystroke encryption technology we developed and use in our GuardedID Ò product is protected by three patents.

 

In November 2010, we received notice that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) had issued an official Notice of Allowance for the patent application for the technology relating to our ProtectID Ò product. In January 2011, we received notice that the USPTO issued to us Patent No. 7,870,599. This “Out-of-Band” patent went through a USPTO Re-Examination process starting on August 16, 2011 and concluded on December 27, 2011, with all our patent claims remaining intact and eight additional patent claims being added. Since 2011, we submitted additional continuation patents on the “Out-of-Band” patent, two were granted and another is still pending.

 

In January 2013, we were assigned the entire right, title and interest in the “Out-of-Band” patent from NetLabs, with the agreement of the developer, and the assignment was recorded with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”).

 

In February 2013, we executed a retainer agreement with our patent attorneys to aggressively enforce our patent rights as “Out-of-Band Authentication” is becoming the standard for authenticating consumers in the financial market and for many Saas application users (e.g., SalesForce, Quickbooks, etc.). In February 2013, our patent attorneys submitted a new “Out-of-Band” patent continuation, which has been granted.

 

In March 2013, our patent attorneys submitted a new “Methods and Apparatus for securing user input in a mobile device” patent, which is now patent pending. Our MobileTrust Ò product is the invention supporting the patent pending.

 

In July 2013, we received notice that the USPTO had added approximately sixty additional patent claims for our Out-of-Band patent we received in January 2011, by issuing to us Patent No. 8,484,698 thereby, we believe, strengthening our position with clients and our current and potential lawsuits.

 

In October 2013, we received notice that the USPTO issued to us Patent No. 8,566,608 “Methods and apparatus for securing keystrokes from being intercepted between the keyboard and a browser.” This protects our GuardedID Ò product and the keystroke encryption portion of our MobileTrust Ò products.

 

In February 2014, we received a Notice of Allowance from the USPTO for our third patent relating to our "Multi-Channel Device Utilizing a Centralized Out-of-Band Authentication System" Patent No. 7,870,599. Upon receipt of this “Out-of-Band” patent we filed another continuation patent.

 

In March 2014, we received Notice of Allowance from the USPTO for our second patent and first continuation of our Keystroke Encryption patent, which only furthers our protection for all mobile devices when utilizing any keyboard for data entry. Upon receipt of this Notice, we also filed another continuation patent for Patent No. 8,566,608.

 

In April 2014, we were granted our third patent relating to our “Multi-Channel Device Utilizing a Centralized Out-of-Band Authentication System” Patent No. 8,713,701.

 

In September 2014, we filed an International Patent for MobileTrust Ò (PCT/US20114/029905).

 

 
20
Table of Contents

 

In March 2015, we received our third patent from the USPTO, Patent No. 8,973,107, of our Keystroke Encryption patent. This enhances our position for our Keystroke Encryption product, GuardedID Ò , and our MobileTrust Ò product.

 

Our suite of products is targeted to the financial, e-commerce, corporate, government, healthcare, legal, insurance, technology and retail sectors. We seek to locate customers in a variety of ways. These primarily include contracts with value added resellers and distributors (both inside the United States and internationally), direct sales calls initiated by our internal staff, exhibitions at security and technology trade shows, through the media, through consulting agreements, and through our agent relationships. Our sales generate revenue either as an Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) model, through a Hosting/License agreement, bundled with other company’s products or through direct purchase by distributors and resellers. We price our products for cloud consumer transactions based on the number of transactions in which our software products are utilized. We also price our products for business applications based on the number of users. These pricing models provide our company with one-time, monthly, quarterly and annual recurring revenues with volume discounts. We are also generating revenues from annual maintenance contracts, renewal fees and expect, but cannot guarantee, an increase in revenues based upon the execution of various agreements that we have recently closed and were implemented during the fourth quarter of 2015, primarily in the retail and insurance sectors.

 

We generated all of our revenues of $392,628 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 (compared to $221,109 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015), from the sales of our security products. The increase in revenues was due to the increase in our software and maintenance sales, including our new mobile technologies. We have realized delays in revenues from some of our new distributor’s that, although there can be no assurances, we anticipate will appear in the last quarter of 2016, and in the delayed rollout of our new mobile security technologies, that are now rolling out through the Apple and Android markets. In addition, we rolled out our GuardedID Ò MAC version that we anticipate, but cannot guarantee, that combined with the new mobile security technologies, will continue to increase our revenues during 2016 and thereafter. Additionally, we believe we have opportunities through our sales distribution channels, including current pilots, which we anticipate, but cannot guarantee, should continue to increase revenues in 2016 and thereafter, especially with the addition of our new mobile security products and new multi-marketing partners. Although we anticipate, but cannot guarantee, the additional revenues as discussed above in the last quarter of 2016, may be realized in fiscal 2017.

 

We market our products globally to financial service firms, healthcare related companies, legal services companies, e-commerce companies, gaming, automotive, government agencies, multi-level marketing groups, the enterprise market in general, and with virtual private network companies, as well as technology service companies and retail distributors that service all the above markets. We seek such sales through our own direct efforts, with emphasis on retail, through distributors, resellers and third party agents internationally. We are also seeking to license the technology as original equipment with computer hardware and software manufacturers. We are engaged in multiple production installations and pilot projects with various distributors, resellers and direct customers primarily in the United States. Our GuardedID Ò product is also being sold directly to consumers, primarily through the Internet as well as distributors, resellers, third party agents, affiliates and potential OEM agreements by bundling GuardedID Ò with their products (providing a value-add and competitive advantage to their own products and offerings). Currently this is the most active market for us with multiple programs in production. We anticipate, but cannot guarantee, continuing increases in revenues in 2016 from these programs. In addition, we have completed the development and testing of our new mobile products, MobileTrust Ò and GuardedID Ò Mobile Software Development Kit (SDK), which is in now available in the Apple Store and the Android Play Store. The mobile products play a major role in our anticipated, but not guaranteed, 2016-2017 revenue projections.

 

We have incurred substantial losses since our inception. Our management believes that our products provide a cost-effective and technologically competitive solution to address the problems of network security and identity theft in general. Updated guidance for the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (“FFIEC”) regulations include the requirement for solutions that have Two-Factor Out-of-Band Authentication and products that stop keylogging malware, real time, which our management believes our proprietary products uniquely and directly address. This new updated guidance went into effect as of January 1, 2012. Based on this new requirement in the latest FFIEC update that was published in June 2011 with enforcement commencing in January 2012, we have experienced a growing increase in sales orders and inquiries. However, there can be no assurance that our products will continue to gain acceptance and continue to grow in the commercial marketplace or that one of our competitors will not introduce technically superior products. 

 

Because we are now experiencing a continual growing market demand, we are developing a sizeable global reseller and distribution channel as a strategy to generate, manage and fulfill demand for our products across market segments, minimizing the requirement for an increase in our staff as we grow our distributor market. We have minimized the concentration on our initial direct sales efforts as our distribution and reseller channels continue to grow internationally and will require appropriate levels of support.

 

On March 18, 2014, we effected a 1:1,500 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. On February 13, 2015, we effected a 1:650 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. On August 4, 2015, we effected a 1:1,000 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock

 

 
21
Table of Contents

  

All shares and per share amounts in the financial statements have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the reverse stock splits adopted by us as if the reverse had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented.

 

Our executive office is located at 1090 King Georges Post Road, Suite 603, Edison, NJ 08837. Our telephone number is (732) 661-9641. We have 8 employees. Our Company’s website is www.strikeforcetech.com (we are not including the information contained in our website as part of, nor should the information be relied upon or incorporated by reference into, this report on Form 10-Q).

 

Business Model

 

We are focusing primarily on developing sales through “channel” relationships in which our products are offered by other manufacturers, distributors, value-added resellers and agents, internationally. In 2015, we added and publicly announced additions to our global distribution sales channel, which provides additional presence for us in the United States, Canada, Europe and Africa. We continue to add additional channel partners, especially on the consumer side and developed a new retail business. We also sell our suite of security products directly from our Edison, New Jersey office, which also augments our channel partner relationships. It is our strategy that these “channel” relationships will provide the greater percentage of our revenues ongoing, as was the case in the past two years. Examples of the channel relationships that we are seeking include already established original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) and bundled relationships with other security technology and software providers that would integrate or bundle the enhanced security capabilities of ProtectID Ò , GuardedID Ò and/or MobileTrust Ò into their own product lines, including our MobileTrust Ò SDK, thereby providing greater value to their clients. These would include providers of networking software and manufacturers of computer and telecommunications hardware and software that provide managed services, and multi-level marketing groups, as well as all markets interested in increasing the value of their products and packages, such as financial services software, anti-virus, government integrators and identity theft product companies. We signed various new distributors during the fourth quarter of 2015 and year-to-date revenues have increased as of September 30, 2016. We have optimistic expectations for continued growth in the fourth quarter of 2016 and thereafter, resulting from these distribution relationships, although we cannot guarantee these results. Additionally, in February 2016, Advanced Cyber Security ("ACS") purchased their option to buy our GuardedID Ò patent for nine million dollars ($9,000,000) to be paid by September 30, 2020, and will resell our GuardedID Ò and MobileTrust Ò products, for which we will receive a royalty, while we retain a perpetual license to resell those products. The distributors have already obtained new clients and we expect, but cannot guarantee, that more clients will be obtained during 2016 and thereafter. There is no guarantee as to the timing and success of these business relationships.

 

From our MobileTrust Ò security application, built with our sCloud registration process, we have created and announced two new products: our new ProtectID Ò Mobile OTP (One Time Password) to be used with ProtectID Ò ; and our new GuardedID Ò Mobile keystroke encryption software development kit (SDK). Both new products are now in production. With the creation of this new GuardedID Ò Mobile SDK, we now focus the sales of this software product to the development groups of our target markets for it to be added to their mobile applications. We are in discussions with many large-scale parties that are interested in this software. Management has already received requests for this software, as keystroke encryption malware grows and remains a major problem for the mobile-cyber security market, particularly with anti-virus products being viewed as non-effective against malware threats.

 

Our primary target markets include financial services such as banks and insurance companies, healthcare providers, legal services, government agencies through integrators, technology platforms, e-commerce based services companies, telecommunications and cellular carriers, technology software companies, government agencies and consumers, especially for our mobile and keystroke encryption products. We are focusing our concentration on cyber security and data breach strategic problem areas, such as where compliance with financial, healthcare, legal and government regulations are key and stolen passwords are used to acquire private information illegally. In the fourth quarter of 2015, several of our channel partners had pilots and client implementations in place that are expected, although no assurances can be provided, to continue to increase our revenues in the fourth quarter of 2016. Our mobile products went into production during the first quarter of 2016 and the revenues related to those products are increasing, primarily as results of the efforts of our channel partners, Advanced Cyber Security and others. There is no guarantee as to the timing and continued success of these efforts.

 

Because we are now expecting a continual, recurring growing market demand, especially in the mobility and encryption markets, we continue to develop an increasing global reseller and distribution channel as a strategy to generate, manage and fulfill demand for our products across market segments, minimizing the requirement for an increase in our staff as we grow our distributor market. We continue to minimize the concentration on our initial direct sales efforts as our distribution and reseller channels continue to grow internationally and provide appropriate levels of sales and support to the growing Cyber Security market.

 

 
22
Table of Contents

 

We seek to generate revenue through fees for ProtectID Ò based on client consumer usage in the financial, healthcare services and legal services markets, as well as enterprises in general, through our Cloud Service, plus one-time and annual per person fees in the enterprise markets which often are for in-house installations of our products, and set-up and recurring transaction fees when the product is accessed in our Cloud Service, along with annual maintenance fees, and other one-time and recurring fees. We have also implemented our new ProtectID Ò v2.3, which includes our Mobile One-Time-Password. We also intend to generate revenues through sales of our GuardedID Ò product. GuardedID Ò pricing is for an annual license and we discount for volume purchases. GuardedID Ò pricing models, especially when bundling through OEM contracts, include monthly and quarterly recurring revenues. As more agreements are reached by our distributors, we are experiencing monthly increasing sales growth, through the execution of GuardedID Ò bundled OEM agreements. We also provide our clients a choice of operating our ProtectID Ò software internally by licensing it or through our hosted Cloud Service or a hybrid that some clients have implemented and none of our competitors presently offer. GuardedID Ò requires a download on each and every computer it protects, whether for employees or consumers. We have four GuardedID Ò products, (i) a standard version which protects browser data entry only, (ii) a premium version which protects almost all the applications running under Microsoft Windows on the desktop, including Microsoft Office Suite and almost all applications running on the desktop, (iii) an Enterprise version which, in addition, provides the Enterprise administrative rights and the use of Microsoft’s Enterprise tools for the product’s deployment, and (iv) an Apple MAC version for all the latest MAC operating systems and for the browsers and entire desktop. Our MobileTrust Ò mobile product will be priced for the consumer through the appropriate mobile phone stores, as well as direct, distribution and OEM sales for higher volume enterprises, including volume discounts to the degree allowed by the telecommunications providers. Our GuardedID Ò Mobile SDK (software development kit) went to the open market in the second quarter of 2016. We anticipate, but cannot guarantee, steadily increasing revenues from this product offering.

 

Our management believes that our products provide a cost-effective and technologically competitive solution to address the increasing problems of network security and cyber security in general. Updated guidance for the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (“FFIEC”) regulations include the requirement for solutions that have Two-Factor Out-of-Band Authentication and products that stop keylogging malware, real time, which our management believes our proprietary products uniquely and directly address. This new updated guidance went into effect as of January 1, 2012. Additionally, the 2014 Verizon Data Breach report, published in April 2015, stated that 80% of all the data breaches they reported would not have occurred if the corporations used two factor authentication, such as our ProtectID Ò system. The report also indicates that over 79% of the data breaches would most likely not have occurred if the corporations breached used anti-keylogging software, such as our GuardedID Ò system in addition to the typical anti-virus programs. Based on the FFIEC requirement, the latest Verizon Data Breach Report and the new articles from the White House urging law firms and legal services firms to add two factor authentication, we have recently experienced a growing increase in pilots and sales orders and inquiries specifically in the financial and legal markets. In January 2014, PCI Compliance published an update that includes the requirement for not only encrypting data at rest, but also to encrypt data in motion including the keystrokes users enter in their device. Additionally, Symantec's senior vice-president for information security, Brian Dye, told the Wall Street Journal that anti-virus "is dead", in an article published in May 2014. However, there can be no assurance that our products will continue to gain acceptance and continue to grow in the commercial marketplace or that one of our competitors will not introduce technically superior products.

 

Marketing

 

Our multi-channel marketing strategy includes:

 

1. Direct sales to enterprise and commercial customers. In this effort, we joined ACS at the RSA Security Show, as well as attending other security related shows and we are looking at other sales alternatives in order to respond aggressively to inquiries related to our products.

 

 

2. The global addition of resellers, agents & distributors (our strategic sales channel) who distribute and resell our products and services to enterprise and commercial customers globally (technology and software product distributors, systems integrators, managed service companies, other security technology and software vendors, telecom companies, cyber security related product companies, etc.).

 

 

3. Application Service Provider (ASP) Partners: Our third party service provides a hosting platform that facilitates faster implementations at competitive prices for our Cloud Service option.

 

 

4. Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM): SFT products are sold to other security technology vendors that integrate ProtectID Ò , GuardedID Ò and now GuardedID Ò Mobile SDK into their products (bundling) and services providing for monthly/annual increasing recurring revenues.

 

 

5. Internet sites and retail stores that sell GuardedID Ò and MobileTrust Ò to consumers and small enterprises.

 

 

6. Technology and other providers and resellers, agents and distributors interested in purchasing and or selling our new MobileTrust Ò cyber solution for all mobile devices, initially for all Apple and Android devices (production started in 2016).

 

 

7. Outside Independent consultants selling our products for commission only, focusing on the healthcare, legal and consumer markets.

 

 
23
Table of Contents

  

Our Cloud service provider is Hosting.com and we have been under contract with them since December 2007 when we executed an agreement with a nationwide premier data center and co-location services provider who functions as an Application Service Provider for our ProtectID Ò , GuardedID Ò and MobileTrust Ò products, which require a secondary server used for the “Out-of-Band” two-factor authentication technology. We believe that this relationship improves the implementation time, reduces the cost and training requirements, and allows for ease of scalability, with hot backups in multiple locations across the U.S., on an as needed basis. Our sCloud site is also SAS 70 (Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 70) certified, which is critical to providing a secure compliant service that is required by most of our clients. Our agreement with the services provider was for a one-year (1) term, initially ending in December 2008 and renewing automatically for one-year (1) terms, and is still in effect. The relationship can be terminated by either party on sixty days’ written notice. The cloud service is based on a flat monthly fee per the terms of the contract that can increase as we require additional services.

 

Intellectual Property

 

We are working with our patent attorneys to aggressively continue to enforce our patent rights now that we have successfully settled our first major patent lawsuit. Our patent attorneys filed our fourth “Out of Band” continuation patents. The third patent was recently granted and the fourth patent is pending. We currently have three patents granted to us for Out-of-Band ProtectID Ò (Patent Nos.: 7,870,599, 8,484,698 and 8,713,701). In September 2014, we filed an International Patent for MobileTrust Ò (PCT/US20114/029905) which is pending.

 

We are also working with our patent attorneys to plan our strategy to aggressively enforce the patent rights relating to our granted Keystroke Encryption patents that help protect our GuardedID Ò and MobileTrust Ò products. We were granted three related keystroke encryption patents for which we received the most recent patent on March 3, 2015 (Patent Nos.: 8,566,608, 8,732,483 and 8,973,107). In February 2016, a channel partner exercised their option to purchase our GuardedID Ò patents, which requires them to pay us $9,000,000 for the patents by September 30, 2020, in addition to royalties on sales.

 

We have four trademarks that have been approved and registered: ProtectID Ò , GuardedID Ò , MobileTrust Ò and CryptoColor Ò . A portion of our software is licensed from third parties and the remainder is developed by our own team of developers while leveraging some external consultant expertise as necessitated. We rely upon confidentiality agreements signed by our employees, consultants and third parties to protect the intellectual property rights.

 

We license technology from third parties, including software that is integrated with internally developed software and used in our products to perform key functions. We anticipate that we will continue to license technology from third parties in the future. Although we are not substantially dependent on any individual licensed technology, some of the software that we license from third parties could be difficult for us to replace. The effective implementation of our products depends upon the successful operation of third-party licensed products in conjunction with our suite of products, and therefore any undetected errors in these licensed products could create delays in the implementation of our products, impair the functionality of our products, delay new product introductions, damage our reputation, and/or cause us to provide substitute products.

 

Business Strategy

 

While we will most likely continue to post operating deficits, our year to date 2016 results show an overall net income, due to the award we received from the confidential settlement of our first major patent remediation litigation. Most of the costs that we incur are related to salaries, professional fees, marketing, sales and research & design. We increased our technology staff by hiring a software engineer in January 2016. Our operations presently require funding of approximately $150,000 per month. We expect that our monthly cash usage for operations will increase slightly due to contracted and anticipated increased volumes and adding some targeted channel marketing programs. We anticipate that the areas in which we will experience the greatest increase in operating expenses is in marketing, selling, product support, product research and new technology development in the growing cyber security market. We are committed to maintaining our current level of operating costs until we reach the level of revenues needed to absorb any potential increase in costs.

 

Our primary strategy throughout 2016 and into fiscal 2017 is to focus on the growth and support of our channel partners, including distributors, resellers and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Our internal sales team targets potential direct sales in industries that management believes provides the greatest potential for short term sales. These include small to medium sized financial institutions, government agencies, e-commerce, healthcare, legal and enterprise businesses. We are also executing agreements with strategic resellers and distributors for marketing, selling and supporting our products internationally. We primarily work with distributors, resellers and agents to generate the bulk of our sales internationally, realizing that this strategy takes longer to nurture, however it is progressing well. We are starting to realize positive results, however slowly, with our sales channel and anticipate, but cannot guarantee, a successful fiscal 2016 and 2017, through the sales channel and from our new mobile and GuardedID Ò MAC products with a concentration of sales already contracted. There can be no assurances, however, that we will succeed in implementing our sales strategy. Although management believes that there is an increasingly strong market for our products as the need for cyber security solutions increases globally, we have not generated substantial revenue from the sale of our products and there is no assurance we can secure a market sufficient to permit us to achieve profitability in fiscal 2017.

 

 
24
Table of Contents

  

Competition

 

The software development and services market is characterized by innovation and competition. There are several well-established companies within the authentication market that offer network security systems in our product market and newer companies with emerging technologies. We believe that our multi-patented “Out-of-Band” multi-factor identity authentication platform is an innovative, secure, adaptable, competitively priced, integrated network authentication platform. The main features of ProtectID Ò include: an open architecture “Out-of-Band” platform for user authentication; operating system independence; biometric layering; soft mobile tokens; mobile authentication; secure website logon; Virtual Private Network (“VPN”) access; domain authentication; newly added Office 365 authentication and multi-level authentication. Unlike other techniques for increased network security, ProtectID Ò does not rely on a specific authentication device or method (e.g., phone, tokens, smart cards, digital certificates, soft mobile tokens, or biometrics, such as a retinal or fingerprint scan). Rather ProtectID Ò has been developed as an “open platform” that incorporates an unlimited number of authentication devices and methods. For example, once a user has been identified to a computer network, a system deploying our ProtectID Ò authentication system permits the “Out-of-Band” authentication of that user by a telephone, iPhone, iPad, Blackberry, PDA, email, hard token, SSL client software, a biometric device such as a voice biometric, or others, before that user is permitted to access the network. By using “Out-of-Band” authentication methods, management believes that ProtectID Ò , now patented and protected through our ongoing litigation, with plans for additional litigation, provides a competitive product for customers with security requirements greater than typical name and password schemes for virtual private networks and computer systems with multiple users at remote locations, as examples. We also believe that our multi-patented keystroke encryption product, GuardedID Ò , offers an additional competitive edge for network security and e-commerce applications that should provide greater levels of security and the ability to evolve over time based on newer technologies when made available. There is less competition for the keystroke encryption product and there are no well-established companies in this space, which explains our current growth in pilots and sales for GuardedID Ò , especially relating to bundled channel partner programs. GuardedID Ò is critical to help prevent key logging viruses, one of the largest sources of cyberattacks and data breaches. GuardedID Ò also is protected with three patents. Our newest product, MobileTrust Ò , is ideal for bringing the functionality of our other two products, especially including keystroke encryption, to all mobile devices, with initial focus on all Apple and Android devices. This product is also protected with our GuardedID Ò patents and some of its features and functions are covered by the Out-of-Band Authentication patent. We also filed an international patent that is in process as of August 2016. Our other new mobile product is GuardedID Ò Mobile SDK, which allows our secured keyboard function as a software development kit for developers to purchase and integrate as part of their secured applications. Considering the features and functions, all our cyber solutions have limited competition based on our products’ ability to protect individual identities and computers/devices against some of the most dangerous and increasing threats. We also have great demand for the mobile products, which are being marketed to all potential new clients.

 

Although we believe that our suite of products offers competitive advantages, there is no assurance that any of these products will continue to increase its market share in the marketplace. Our competitors include established software and hardware companies that are likely to be better financed and to have established sales channels. Due to the high level of innovation in the software development industry, it is also possible that a competitor will introduce a product that provides a higher level of security than our products or which can be offered at prices that are more advantageous to the customer.

 

Results of Operations

 

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015

 

Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2016 were $183,029 compared to $76,371 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $106,658 or 140%. The increase in revenues was due to the increase in the sales and license of our software and mobile products.

 

Revenues generated consisted of hardware and software sales, services and maintenance sales, revenue from sign on fees, and recurring transaction fees. Software, services and maintenance sales for the three months ended September 30, 2016 were $182,029 compared to $74,559 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $107,470. The increase in software, services and maintenance revenues was primarily due to the increase in the sales and license of our software and mobile products. Hardware sales for the three months ended September 30, 2016 were $1,000 compared to $1,812 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, a decrease of $812. The decrease in hardware revenues was due to the decrease in sales of our one-time-password token key-fobs.

 

 
25
Table of Contents

  

Cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was $888 compared to $2,228 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, a decrease of $1,340, or 60.1%. The decrease resulted from the decrease in sales of our one-time-password token key-fobs. Cost of revenues as a percentage of total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was 0.5% compared to 2.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2015. 

 

Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was $182,141 compared to $74,143 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $107,998, or 146%. The increase in gross profit was primarily due to the increase in the sales and license of our software and mobile products.

 

Research and development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2016 were $125,654 compared to $64,223 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $61,431 or 95.7%. The increase in research and development expenses was due to the addition of one staff member (we increased our technology staff by hiring a software engineer in January 2016) and the testing of our mobile products. The salaries, benefits and overhead costs of personnel conducting research and development of our software products primarily comprise research and development expenses.

 

Compensation, professional fees, and selling, general and administrative (collectively, “SGA”) expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2016 were $483,061 compared to $225,682 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $257,379 or 114%. The increase was due primarily to the increase in salaries and related payroll taxes resulting from salary increases implemented in January 2016 and expenses relating to options granted to employees in September 2016. SG&A expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and overhead costs for executive and administrative personnel, insurance, fees for professional services, including consulting, legal, and accounting fees, plus travel costs and non-cash stock compensation expense for the issuance of stock options to employees and non-employees, and other general corporate expenses.

 

Other income (expense) for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was $109,063 as compared to other expense of ($174,488) for the three months ended September 30, 2015, an increase in of $283,551, or 163%. The increase was primarily due to forgiveness of debt and the change in the fair value of derivative liabilities, offset by interest expense.

 

Our net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was $317,511 compared to $390,250 for the three months ended September 30, 2015, a decrease in net loss of $72,739, or 18.6%. The decrease was due primarily to the increase in other income caused by forgiveness of debt and the change in the fair value of derivative liabilities, and the increase in revenues, offset by increases in SGA expenses.

 

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 COMPARED TO THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015

 

Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $392,628 compared to $221,109 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $171,519 or 77.6%. The increase in revenues was due to the increase in the sales and license of our software and mobile products.

 

Revenues generated consisted of hardware and software sales and license, services and maintenance sales, revenue from sign on fees, and recurring transaction fees. Software, services and maintenance sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $389,388 compared to $216,655 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $172,733. The increase in software, services and maintenance revenues was primarily due to the increase in the sales of our software and mobile products. Hardware sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $3,240 compared to $4,454 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, a decrease of $1,214. The decrease in hardware revenues was due to the decrease in sales of our one-time-password token key-fobs.

 

Cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $4,852 compared to $6,215 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, a decrease of $1,363, or 21.9%. The decrease resulted from the decrease in sales of our one-time-password token key-fobs. Cost of revenues as a percentage of total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 1.2% compared to 2.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. 

 

 
26
Table of Contents

  

Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $387,776 compared to $214,894 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $172,882, or 80.5%. The increase in gross profit was primarily due to the increase in the sales and license of our software and mobile products.

  

Research and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $378,874 compared to $189,750 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $189,124, or 99.7%. The increase in research and development expenses was due to the addition of one staff member (we increased our technology staff by hiring a software engineer in January 2016) and the testing of our mobile products, which required the purchase of peripherals for testing purposes. The salaries, benefits and overhead costs of personnel conducting research and development of our software products primarily comprise research and development expenses.

 

Compensation, professional fees, and selling, general and administrative (collectively, “SGA”) expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $1,425,198 compared to $884,532 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, an increase of $540,666 or 61.1%. The increase was due primarily to the increase in salaries and related payroll taxes resulting from salary increases implemented in January 2016, an increase in professional fees, expenses relating to options granted to employees in September 2016 and an increase in warrant expense. SG&A expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits and overhead costs for executive and administrative personnel, insurance, fees for professional services, including consulting, legal, and accounting fees, plus travel costs and non-cash stock compensation expense for the issuance of stock options to employees and non-employees and other general corporate expenses.

 

Other income (expense) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $5,722,652 as compared to $593,562 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, representing an increase in other income of $5,129,090, or 864%. The increase was primarily due to the confidential net settlement of patent remediation litigation, which was settled in January 2016, the extinguishment of derivatives relating to the payoff of convertible debt and forgiveness of debt, offset by interest expense.

 

Our net income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $4,306,356 compared to a net loss of ($265,826) for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, an increase in net income of $4,572,182, or 1,720%. The increase was primarily due to the confidential net settlement of patent remediation litigation, which was settled in January 2016, the extinguishment of derivatives relating to the payoff of convertible debt and forgiveness of debt, offset by increases in SGA expenses and interest expense.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred a loss from operations of $1,416,296 and at September 30, 2016, we had a stockholders’ deficit of $7,621,534. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. In addition, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in its report on the Company’s December 31, 2015 financial statements, has raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

We have historically incurred recurring operating losses and have financed our operations through loans, principally from affiliated parties such as our directors, and from the proceeds of debt and equity financing.

 

We financed our operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily through the net settlement of patent remediation litigation which was settled in January 2016. Management anticipates that we will rely on our revenues and the proceeds from the litigation settlement net payment to finance our operations through December 31, 2016. While management believes that there will be a substantial percentage of our sales generated from our GuardedID Ò and new mobile products and there are an increasing number of customers for our patented ProtectID Ò product, we will continue to have customer concentrations. Inherently, as time progresses and corporate exposure in the market continues to grow, with increasing marketing efforts, management believes, but cannot guarantee, we will continue to attain greater numbers of customers.

 

Our number of common shares outstanding increased from 22,711,924 shares at December 31, 2015 to 2,318,676,386 at September 30, 2016, an increase of 10,109%. The increase in the number of common shares outstanding was due to common shares issued related to the conversion of convertible debt, in order to reduce our outstanding debentures, and the conversion of Series B Preferred Stock.

 

 
27
Table of Contents

  

Our number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding decreased from 175,338 shares at December 31, 2015 to 50,001 at September 30, 2016, a decrease of 71.5%. The decrease was due to the conversion of Series B Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock.

 

We have historically incurred operating losses and our operations presently require funding of approximately $150,000 per month. While we are presently cash flow positive, management believes, but cannot provide assurances, that we will continue to be cash flow positive in fiscal 2016, based on the confidential settlement of patent remediation litigation and recently executed and announced contracts and potential contracts that we closed in the fourth quarter of 2015 in the financial industry, technology, insurance, enterprise, healthcare, government, legal, and consumer sectors in the United States, Latin America, Europe, Africa and the Pacific Rim. There can be no assurance, however, that the sales anticipated will materialize or that we will achieve the profitability we have forecasted. Management also recognizes the consequences of current world economic developments and the possible volatile effect on currency rates resulting from revenues derived from foreign markets.

 

SUMMARY OF FUNDED DEBT TRANSACTIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we repaid a total of $686,738 of unsecured convertible notes to eleven unrelated parties. Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, ten investor firms converted $143,123 of convertible notes, $49,560 of accrued interest and $386,202 of additional interest, into 2,105,237,983 shares of our common stock. The conversion prices ranged from $0.000058 per share to $0.0008 per share.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we issued unsecured notes in an aggregate total of $75,000 to one unrelated party. Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we repaid a total of $633,785 of unsecured notes to six unrelated parties.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we repaid a total of $345,200 of secured notes to two unrelated parties.

 

Summary of Funded Debt

 

As of September 30, 2016, our company’s open unsecured promissory note balance was $1,791,824, listed as follows:

 

· $50,000 to an unrelated individual - current term portion

 

 

· $210,000 to an unrelated company - current portion

 

 

· $1,345,000 to twenty unrelated individuals through term sheet with the StrikeForce Investor Group - current portion

 

 

· $137,500 to an unrelated company - current portion

 

 

· $16,324 to an unrelated company - current portion

 

 

· $33,000 to an unrelated company - current portion

 

As of September 30, 2016, our company’s open unsecured related party promissory note balances were $742,513, listed as follows:

 

· $742,513 to our CEO - current portion

 

As of September 30, 2016, our company’s open convertible secured note balances were $542,588, listed as follows:

 

· $542,588 to DART (custodian for Citco Global and as assigned in 04/09 by YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd.)

 

 
28
Table of Contents

  

As of September 30, 2016, our company’s open convertible note balances were $905,512, listed as follows (month/year):

 

· $235,000 to an unrelated company (03/05 unsecured debenture) - current portion

 

 

· $7,000 to an unrelated company (06/05 unsecured debenture) - current portion

 

 

· $10,000 to an unrelated individual (06/05 unsecured debenture) - current portion

 

 

· $40,000 to three unrelated individuals (07/05 unsecured debentures) - current portion

 

 

· $10,000 to an unrelated individual (12/05 unsecured debenture) - current portion

 

 

· $30,000 to an unrelated individual (06/06 unsecured debenture) - current portion

 

 

· $70,000 to an unrelated individual (09/06 unsecured debenture) - current portion

 

 

· $3,512 to an unrelated individual (02/07 unsecured debenture) - current portion

 

 

· $100,000 to an unrelated individual (05/07 unsecured debenture) - current portion

 

 

· $100,000 to an unrelated individual (06/07 unsecured debentures) - current portion

 

 

· $100,000 to an unrelated individual (07/07 unsecured debenture) - current portion

 

 

· $120,000 to three unrelated individuals (08/07 unsecured debentures) - current portion

 

 

· $50,000 to two unrelated individuals (12/09 unsecured debentures) - current portion

 

 

· $30,000 to an unrelated company (03/10 unsecured debenture) - current portion

 

As of September 30, 2016, our company’s open convertible note balances - related parties were $355,500, listed as follows:

 

· $268,000 to our CEO - current portion

 

 

· $57,500 to our VP of Technical Services - current portion

 

 

· $30,000 to a relative of our CTO & one of our Software Developers - current portion

 

 
29
Table of Contents

  

The terms of convertible secured debentures issued to certain of the existing stockholders require that we obtain the consent of such stockholders prior to our entering into subsequent financing arrangements. No assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain additional financing on terms that are favorable to us or that the holders of the secured debentures will provide their consent to permit us to enter into subsequent financing arrangements.

 

Except for the limitations imposed upon us respective to the convertible secured debentures of DART (custodian for Citco Global and as assigned by YA Global and Highgate House Funds, Ltd.), there are no material or known trends that will restrict either short term or long-term liquidity.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, result of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include those related to accounting for potential liabilities and the assumptions made in valuing stock instruments issued for services and derivative liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Revenue Recognition Policy

 

We recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. We consider revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. When we recognize revenue, no provisions are made for returns because, historically, there have been very few sales returns and adjustments that have impacted the ultimate collection of revenues.

 

Revenue from hardware sales is recognized when the product is shipped to the customer and there are either no unfulfilled obligations by us, or any obligations that will not affect the customer's final acceptance of the arrangement. All costs of these obligations are accrued when the corresponding revenue is recognized.

 

Revenue from time and service contracts is recognized as the services are provided. Revenue from delivered elements of one-time charge licensed software is recognized at the inception of the license term, provided we have vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of each delivered element. Revenue is deferred for undelivered elements. We recognize revenue from the sale of software licenses when the four criteria discussed above are met. If we determine that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, we defer the fee and recognize revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash. Revenue from monthly software licenses is recognized on a subscription basis.

 

We offer an Application Service Provider (ASP) hosted cloud service whereby customer usage transactions are invoiced monthly on a cost per transaction basis.

 

 
30
Table of Contents

  

Stock Compensation

 

We periodically issue stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. We account for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) whereas the value of the award is measured on the date of grant and recognized as compensation expense on the straight-line basis over the vesting period. We account for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with the authoritative guidance of the FASB whereas the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Options granted to non-employees are revalued each reporting period to determine the amount to be recorded as an expense in the respective period. As the options vest, they are valued on each vesting date and an adjustment is recorded for the difference between the value already recorded and the then current value on the date of vesting. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the measurement date.

 

The fair value of our stock option and warrant grants are estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the stock options or warrants, and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model, and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model could materially affect compensation expense recorded in future periods.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments

 

We evaluate our financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

 

To determine the number of authorized but unissued shares available to satisfy outstanding convertible securities, we use a sequencing method to prioritize its convertible securities as prescribed by ASC 815-40-35. At each reporting date, we review our convertible securities to determine their classification is appropriate.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

Refer to Note 1 in the accompanying financial statements.

 

Additional Information

 

We file reports and other materials with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents may be inspected and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20549. You can obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. You can also get copies of documents that we file with the Commission through the Commission’s Internet site at www.sec.gov .

 

Additional Information

 

You are advised to read this Form 10-Q in conjunction with other reports and documents that we file from time to time with the SEC. In particular, please read our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, and Current Reports on Form 8-K that we file from time to time. You may obtain copies of these reports directly from us or from the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F. Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549, and you may obtain information about obtaining access to the Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains information for electronic filers at its website http://www.sec.gov.

 

 
31
Table of Contents

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

As a smaller reporting company we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

 

Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) require public companies to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” which are defined as controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

We carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and our Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the effectiveness our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2016. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the following material weaknesses:

 

1. We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which is applicable to us as of and for the interim period ending September 30, 2016. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

 

2. Our board of directors has no independent director or member with financial expertise which causes ineffective oversight of our external financial reporting and internal control over financial reporting.

 

3. We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

 

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

 

Remediation of Material Weaknesses

 

We intend to remediate the material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures identified above by adding an independent director or member with financial expertise or hiring a full-time CFO with SEC reporting experience in the future when working capital permits and by working with our independent registered public accounting firm to refine our internal procedures.

 

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
32
Table of Contents

  

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

On March 28, 2013, we initiated patent litigation against an outside party. As of March 31, 2015, the case was in full discovery, the pre-trial hearing was held, and the deliberations were continuing. Mediation took place in May 2015 to discuss a potential settlement, and on January 15, 2016, the parties reached a settlement in the matter. Per the terms of the settlement, we received a payment of $4.9 million, net of legal fees, which was recorded as other income in the first quarter of 2016.

 

On June 20, 2016, we initiated additional patent litigation against three major competitors in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in Newark, for infringement of United States Patent No. 8,484,698. This litigation is ongoing.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

Not required under Regulation S-K for “smaller reporting companies.”

 

Information about risk factors for the interim period ended September 30, 2016, does not differ materially from that set forth in Part I, Item 1A of our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

ITEM 2. RECENT ISSUANCES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

 

In September 2016, four holders of our Series B Preferred Stock converted 125,337 series B preferred shares into 35,703,979 shares of our common stock at conversion prices ranging from $0.00383 to $0.00532 per share. A total of 32,894,737 of the common shares were issued in October 2016.

 

In September 2016, we issued a total of 7,500 shares of restricted common stock, valued at $149, relating to a December 2009 retainer agreement with an attorney.

 

In September 2016, we awarded options to purchase 196,000,000 shares of our common stock to our management team and employees, exercisable at $0.00625 per share, expiring ten (10) years from the date of grant and vesting over a six-month period.

 

All of the above offerings and sales, except the afore-mentioned shares issued pursuant to a conversion of convertible notes, were made in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, based on the following: (a) the investors confirmed to us that they were “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 and had such background, education and experience in financial and business matters as to be able to evaluate the merits and risks of an investment in the securities; (b) there was no public offering or general solicitation with respect to the offering; (c) the investors were provided with certain disclosure materials and all other information requested with respect to our company; (d) where applicable, the investors acknowledged that all securities being purchased were “restricted securities” for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, and agreed to transfer such securities only in a transaction registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or exempt from registration under the Securities Act; and (e) where applicable, a legend was placed on the certificates representing each such security stating that it was restricted and could only be transferred if subsequent registered under the Securities Act of 1933 or transferred in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933.

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

 

The Company has not made various principal and interest payments on many of its debt obligations. It continues to seek work-out arrangements and applicable refinancing with new or revised debt or equity instruments. See Notes 5, 7, and 9 to the condensed financial statements.

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Effective January 25, 2016, the Board of Directors determined to increase the base salaries of its officers and employees, including its named executive officers, such that the new salaries are comparable to similarly situated companies. Consequently, the base salaries of Mark Kay, George Waller, and Ram Pemmaraju have been set at $150,000 per annum. Other employees were granted increases to between $105,000 and $125,000 per annum. Additionally, our officers forgave an aggregate total of $699,000 of accrued payroll, from prior years' missed salaries, that we owed to them. We recorded the officers’ forgiveness of accrued payroll as a capital contribution in January 2016.

 

 
33
Table of Contents

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

Exhibit Number

Description

 

 

 

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc.(1)

3.2

Amended Articles of Incorporation of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (5)

3.3

By-laws of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (1)

3.4

Amended By-laws of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (5)

3.5

Amended By-laws of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (6)

3.6

Articles of Amendment of StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. (6)

10.1

2004 Stock Option Plan (1)

10.2

Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 20, 2004, by and among StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and YA Global Investments, LP. (1)

10.3

Secured Convertible Debenture with YA Global Investments, LP. (1)

10.4

Investor Registration Rights Agreement dated December 20, 2004, by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and YA Global Investments, LP in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement.(2)

10.5

Escrow Agreement, dated December 20, 2004, by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and YA Global Investments, LP in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement. (2)

10.6

Security Agreement dated December 20, 2004, by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and YA Global Investments, LP in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement. (1)

10.7

Secured Convertible Debenture with YA Global Investments, LP dated January 18, 2005. (1)

10.8

Royalty Agreement with NetLabs.com, Inc. and Amendments. (1)

10.9

Employment Agreement dated as of May 20, 2003, by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and Mark L. Kay. (1)

10.10

Amended and Restated Secured Convertible Debenture with YA Global Investments, LP dated April 27, 2005. (1)

10.11

Amendment and Consent dated as of April 27, 2005, by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and YA Global Investments, LP. (1)

10.12

Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 27, 2005 by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. (1)

10.13

Investor Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 27, 2005 by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. (2)

10.14

Secured Convertible Debenture with Highgate House Funds, Ltd. dated April 27, 2005. (2)

10.15

Escrow Agreement dated as of April 27, 2005 by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc., Highgate House Funds, Ltd. and Gottbetter & Partners, LLP. (1)

10.16

Escrow Shares Escrow Agreement dated as of April 27, 2005 by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc., Highgate House Funds, Ltd. and Gottbetter & Partners, LLP. (1)

10.17

Security Agreement dated as of April 27, 2005 by and between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and Highgate House Funds, Ltd. (1)

10.18

Network Service Agreement with Panasonic Management Information Technology Service Company dated August 1, 2003 (and amendment). (1)

10.19

Client Non-Disclosure Agreement. (1)

10.20

Employee Non-Disclosure Agreement. (1)

10.21

Secured Convertible Debenture with Highgate House Funds, Ltd. dated May 6, 2005. (2)

10.22

Termination Agreement with YA Global Investments, LP dated February 19, 2005. (1)

10.23

Securities Purchase Agreement with WestPark Capital, Inc. (4)

10.24

Form of Promissory Note with WestPark Capital, Inc. (4)

10.25

Investor Registration Rights Agreement with WestPark Capital, Inc. (4)

10.26

Drawdown Equity Financing Facility with Auctus Private Equity Fund, LLC., dated April 13, 2012 (7)

10.27

Registration Rights Agreement with Auctus Private Equity Fund, LLC, dated April 13, 2012 (7)

10.28

StrikeForce Technologies Inc. WEBEX Presentation dated May 30, 2012 (8)

10.29

Irrevocable Waiver of Conversion Rights of Mark L. Kay (9)

10.30

Irrevocable Waiver of Conversion Rights of Ramarao Pemmaraju (9)

10.31

Irrevocable Waiver of Conversion Rights of George Waller (9)

10.32

CFO Consultant Agreement with Philip E. Blocker (9)

10.33

Resume of Philip E. Blocker (9)

10.34

Corporate Resolution for Issuance of Common Stock to Auctus Private Equity Fund, LLC (9)

10.35

Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement (11)

10.36

2012 Stock Option Plan (12)

10.37

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation (13)

10.38

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation (14)

10.39

Registration of Classes of Securities (15)

10.40

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation (16)

10.41

Registration of Classes of Securities (17)

10.42

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation (18)

10.43

Registration of Classes of Securities (19)

10.44

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation (20)

 

 
34
Table of Contents

 

10.45

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation (21)

10.46

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation (22)

10.47

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation (23)

10.48

Amendments to Articles of Incorporation (24)

10.49

Asset Purchase Agreement between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and Cyber Safety, Inc., dated August 24, 2015 (25)

10.50

Amendment to the Asset Purchase Agreement and Distributor and Reseller Agreement between StrikeForce Technologies, Inc. and Cyber Safety, Inc. (26)

31.1

Certification by Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, promulgated pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (3)

31.2

Certification by Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, promulgated pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (3)

32.1

Certification by Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, promulgated pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (3)

32.2

Certification by Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, promulgated pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (3)

_____________

(1) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form SB-2 dated as of May 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(2) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to Form SB-2 dated as of June 27, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(3) Filed herewith.

 

 

(4) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated August 1, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(5) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated December 23, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(6) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated February 4, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(7) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated May 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(8) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated May 30, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(9) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form S-1/A dated July 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(10) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form S-1/A dated September 7, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(11) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated October 3, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(12) Filed in conjunction with the Registrant’s Form 14A filed October 5, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(13) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated February 5, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(14) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated May 14, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(15) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-A dated July 29, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(16) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated August 22, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(17) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-A dated October 3, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(18) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated October 3, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(19) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-A dated December 31, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(20) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated December 31, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(21) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated March 18, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(22) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated December 22, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(23) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated February 13, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(24) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated August 4, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(25) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated August 28, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(26) Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated February 2, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

 
35
Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

Dated: November 17, 2016

By:

/s/  Mark L. Kay

 

Mark L. Kay

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

Dated: November 17, 2016

By:

/s/  Philip E. Blocker

 

Philip E. Blocker

 

Chief Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer

 

 

36

 

Strikeforce Technologies, Inc. (USOTC:SFOR)
Historical Stock Chart

1 Year : From Apr 2016 to Apr 2017

Click Here for more Strikeforce Technologies, Inc. Charts.

Strikeforce Technologies, Inc. (USOTC:SFOR)
Intraday Stock Chart

Today : Sunday 30 April 2017

Click Here for more Strikeforce Technologies, Inc. Charts.



Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.


NYSE, AMEX, and ASX quotes are delayed by at least 20 minutes.
All other quotes are delayed by at least 15 minutes unless otherwise stated.