UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
N
OTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of United Security Bancshares, Inc. (“USBI”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”). USBI is the parent holding company of First US Bank (the “Bank” or “FUSB”). The Bank operates a finance company, Acceptance Loan Company, Inc. (“ALC”). All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated.
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 201
6. While certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), management believes that the disclosures herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in USBI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. The accounting policies followed by the Company are set forth in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in USBI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. Certain amounts in the 2015 condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2016 method of presentation. Included in these reclassifications was approximately $0.7 million that was reclassified from other liabilities to surplus on the Interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015 related to shares of stock that had been accrued as of the balance sheet date as deferred compensation for members of USBI's Board of Directors.
2.
|
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
Accounting Standards Update (“
ASU”) 2016-13
,
"Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.”
Issued in June 2016, ASU 2016-13 removes the thresholds that companies apply to measure credit losses on financial instruments measured at amortized cost, such as loans, receivables, and held-to-maturity debt securities. Under current U.S. GAAP, companies generally recognize credit losses when it is probable that the loss has been incurred. The revised guidance will remove all current recognition thresholds and will require companies to recognize an allowance for lifetime expected credit losses. Credit losses will be immediately recognized through net income; the amount recognized will be based on the current estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected over the financial asset’s contractual term. ASU 2016-13 also amends the credit loss measurement guidance for available-for-sale debt securities. For public business entities, ASU 2016-13 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and for interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Institutions will be required to apply the changes through a cumulative-effect adjustment to their retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Management is currently evaluating the impact that this ASU will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2016-10, “
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)-Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing.”
Issued in April 2016, ASU 2016-10 clarifies
ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers"
with respect to (i) identifying performance obligations; and (ii) the licensing implementation guidance. Since the amendments in ASU 2016-10 affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09,
“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),”
which is not yet effective, this ASU will become effective when ASU 2014-09 becomes effective. The amendments of ASU 2016-10 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Management is currently evaluating the impact that this ASU will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2016-09, “
Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718)-Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.”
Issued in March 2016, ASU 2016-09 seeks to reduce complexity in accounting standards by simplifying several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including (1) accounting for income taxes; (2) classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows; (3) forfeitures; (4) minimum statutory tax withholding requirements; (5) classification of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares for tax withholding purposes; (6) the practical expedient for estimating the expected term; and (7) intrinsic value. The amendments of ASU 2016-09 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Management is currently evaluating the impact that this ASU will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2016-08,
“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net).”
Issued in March 2016, ASU 2016-08 clarifies certain principal versus agent considerations within the implementation guidance of
ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.”
Since the amendments in ASU 2016-08 affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09,
“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),”
which is not yet effective, this ASU will become effective when ASU 2014-09 becomes effective. The amendments of ASU 2016-08 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Management is currently evaluating the impact that this ASU will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2016-05
,
“Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships.”
Issued in March 2016, ASU 2016-05
clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as a hedging instrument under ASC Topic 815 does not, in and of itself, require de-designation of that hedging relationship, provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. The amendments of ASU 2016-05 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Management is currently evaluating the impact that this ASU will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).”
Issued in February 2016, ASU 2016-02 will require organizations that lease assets (lessees) to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by the lease for all leases with a term of more than 12 months. The recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease are not significantly changed under ASU 2016-02. There will continue to be differentiation between finance leases and operating leases. For finance leases, a lessee will be required to (i) recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in the statement of financial position; (ii) recognize interest on the lease liability separately from amortization of the right-of-use asset in the statement of income; and (iii) classify repayments of the principal portion of the lease liability within financing activities and payments of interest on the lease liability within operating activities on the statement of cash flows. For operating leases, a lessee will be required to (i) recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, in the statement of financial position; (ii) recognize a single lease cost, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis; and (iii) classify all cash payments within operating activities in the statement of cash flows. The accounting applied by the lessor in a lease transaction remains largely unchanged from previous U.S. GAAP. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the impact that this ASU will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2016-01, “
Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (An Amendment of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification).”
Issued in January 2016, ASU 2016-01 is intended to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with improved decision-making information. The amendments to ASU 2016-01 include: (i) requiring equity investments, except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in the consolidation of an investee, to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (ii) requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values; and (iii) clarifying that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. The amendments of ASU 2016-01 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact that this ASU will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2015-05, “
Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement.”
Issued in April 2015, ASU 2015-05 provides guidance on how customers should evaluate whether cloud computing arrangements contain a software license that should be accounted for separately. A customer that determines that such an arrangement contains a software license must account for the license consistently with the acquisition of other software licenses. If an arrangement does not contain a software license, then the customer is required to account for it as a service contract. As a result, all software licenses within the scope of this guidance will be accounted for consistently with other licenses of intangible assets. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Entities can elect to apply the guidance either retrospectively or prospectively to all cloud computing arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date. ASU 2015-05 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2016 and was applied using the prospective transition method. The adoption of ASU 2015-05 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2015-02,
“
Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis
.”
Issued in February 2015, ASU 2015-02 is intended to improve targeted areas of consolidation guidance for legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability companies and certain entities involved in securitization transactions. ASU 2015-02 focuses on the consolidation criteria for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. The new standard simplifies and improves current U.S. GAAP by: (i) placing more emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest; (ii) reducing the frequency of the application of related-party guidance when determining a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (
“
VIE
”
); and (iii) changing consolidation conclusions for companies in several industries that typically make use of limited partnerships or VIEs. ASU 2015-02 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-02 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).”
Issued in May 2014, ASU 2014-09 will add
FASB ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers,
and will supersede revenue recognition requirements in
FASB ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition
and certain cost guidance in
FASB ASC Topic 605-35, Revenue Recognition – Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts.
ASU 2014-09 provides a framework for revenue recognition that replaces the existing industry and transaction-specific requirements under the existing standards. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to apply a five-step model to determine when to recognize revenue and at what amount. The model specifies that revenue should be recognized when (or as) an entity transfers control of goods or services to a customer at the amount to which the entity expects to be entitled. Depending on whether certain criteria are met, revenue should be recognized either over time, in a manner that depicts the entity’s performance, or at a point in time, when control of the goods or services is transferred to the customer. ASU 2014-09 provides that an entity should apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in each contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in each contract; and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In addition, the existing requirements for the recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of non-financial assets that are not in a contract with a customer are amended to be consistent with the guidance on recognition and measurement in ASU 2014-09. The amendments of ASU 2014-09 may be applied either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of initial application. If the transition method of application is elected, the entity should also provide the additional disclosures in reporting periods that include the date of initial application regarding (1) the amount by which each financial statement line item is affected in the current reporting period and (2) an explanation of the reasons for significant changes.
ASU 2015-14,
“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)-Deferral of the Effective Date,”
issued in August 2015, defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. ASU 2015-14 provides that the amendments of ASU 2014-09 become effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Management is currently evaluating the impact that this ASU will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, as well as the most appropriate method of application; however, regardless of the method of application selected, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Included in basic shares are certain shares that have been accrued as of the balance sheet date as deferred comp
ensation for members of USBI’s Board of Directors. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, adjusted for the effect of potentially dilutive stock awards outstanding during the period. The dilutive shares consist of nonqualified stock option grants issued to employees and members of USBI’s Board of Directors pursuant to the United Security Bancshares, Inc. 2013 Incentive Plan (the “2013 Incentive Plan”) previously approved by USBI’s shareholders. The following table reflects weighted average shares used to calculate basic and diluted net income per share for the periods presented.
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Basic shares
|
|
|
6,147,727
|
|
|
|
6,139,268
|
|
|
|
6,145,326
|
|
|
|
6,136,882
|
|
Dilutive shares
|
|
|
272,550
|
|
|
|
177,050
|
|
|
|
272,550
|
|
|
|
177,050
|
|
Diluted shares
|
|
|
6,420,277
|
|
|
|
6,316,318
|
|
|
|
6,417,876
|
|
|
|
6,313,932
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
779
|
|
|
$
|
1,610
|
|
Basic net income per share
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Comprehensive income consists of net income, as well as unrealized holding gains and losses that arise during the period associated with the Company
’s available-for-sale securities portfolio and the effective portion of cash flow hedge derivatives. In the calculation of comprehensive income, reclassification adjustments are made for gains or losses realized in the statement of operations associated with the sale of available-for-sale securities or changes in the fair value of cash flow derivatives.
Details of investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity as of
June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows:
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
June 30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
110,687
|
|
|
$
|
1,849
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
112,516
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
53,472
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
|
|
53,311
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
10,267
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,929
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
177,273
|
|
|
$
|
2,816
|
|
|
$
|
(476
|
)
|
|
$
|
179,613
|
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
June 30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
17,396
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
17,501
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies
|
|
|
13,972
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
14,047
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
2,184
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
2,221
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
33,552
|
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,769
|
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
135,104
|
|
|
$
|
998
|
|
|
$
|
(608
|
)
|
|
$
|
135,494
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
45,961
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
|
|
45,509
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
14,071
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
14,998
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
197,995
|
|
|
$
|
2,093
|
|
|
$
|
(1,245
|
)
|
|
$
|
198,843
|
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
16,321
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
(170
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,184
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies
|
|
|
13,766
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
32,359
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
(245
|
)
|
|
$
|
32,184
|
|
The scheduled maturities of investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity as of June 30
, 2016 are presented in the following table:
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Maturing within one year
|
|
$
|
1,930
|
|
|
$
|
1,947
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Maturing after one to five years
|
|
|
6,124
|
|
|
|
6,256
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
Maturing after five to ten years
|
|
|
94,262
|
|
|
|
95,782
|
|
|
|
9,653
|
|
|
|
9,674
|
|
Maturing after ten years
|
|
|
74,957
|
|
|
|
75,628
|
|
|
|
22,436
|
|
|
|
22,586
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
177,273
|
|
|
$
|
179,613
|
|
|
$
|
33,552
|
|
|
$
|
33,769
|
|
For purposes of the maturity table, mortgage-backed securities, which are not due at a single maturity date, have been allocated over maturity groupings based on the weighted-average contractual maturities of underlying collateral. The mortgage-backed securities generally mature earlier than their weighted-average contractual maturities because of principal prepayments.
The following table reflects gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of
June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
June 30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
1,646
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,099
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
Commercial
|
|
|
13,893
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
13,612
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,619
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,711
|
|
|
$
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
June 30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies
|
|
$
|
1,396
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,964
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
83,403
|
|
|
$
|
(458
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,061
|
|
|
$
|
(150
|
)
|
Commercial
|
|
|
24,337
|
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
8,918
|
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
111,208
|
|
|
$
|
(751
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,979
|
|
|
$
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
14,143
|
|
|
$
|
(170
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies
|
|
|
11,163
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
25,878
|
|
|
$
|
(218
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,560
|
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment no less frequently than quarterly, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (i) the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (iii) whether the Company intends to sell securities and (iv) whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases.
As of June
30, 2016, 13 debt securities had been in a loss position for more than 12 months, and 11 debt securities had been in a loss position for less than 12 months. As of December 31, 2015, 13 debt securities had been in a loss position for more than 12 months, and 102 debt securities had been in a loss position for less than 12 months. As of both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the losses for all securities were considered to be a direct result of the effect that the prevailing interest rate environment had on the value of debt securities and were not related to the creditworthiness of the issuers. Further, the Company has the current intent and ability to retain its investments in the issuers for a period of time that management believes to be sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Therefore, the Company did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairments as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Investment securities available-for-sale with a carrying value of $78.4
million and $61.3 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes.
Gains realized on sales of securities available-for-sale were approximately
$0.4 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015. There were no losses on sales of securities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 or the year ended December 31, 2015.
6.
|
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
Portfolio Segments
The Company has divided the loan portfolio into eight portfolio segments, each with different risk characteristics described as follows:
Construction, land development and other land loans
– Commercial construction, land and land development loans include loans for the development of residential housing projects, loans for the development of commercial and industrial use property and loans for the purchase and improvement of raw land. These loans are secured in whole or in part by the underlying real estate collateral and are generally guaranteed by the principals of the borrowing entity.
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
– These loans include conventional mortgage loans on one-to-four family residential properties. These properties may serve as the borrower’s primary residence, vacation home or investment property. Also included in this portfolio are home equity loans and lines of credit. This type of lending, which is secured by a first or second mortgage on the borrower’s residence, allows customers to borrow against the equity in their home.
Secured by multi-family residential properties
– This portfolio segment includes mortgage loans secured by apartment buildings.
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
– This portfolio segment includes real estate loans secured by commercial and industrial properties, office or mixed-use facilities, strip shopping centers or other commercial property. These loans are generally guaranteed by the principals of the borrowing entity.
Other real estate loans
– Other real estate loans are loans primarily for agricultural production, secured by mortgages on farmland.
Commercial and industrial loans
– This portfolio segment includes loans to commercial customers for use in the normal course of business. These credits may be loans and lines of credit to financially strong borrowers, secured by inventories, equipment or receivables, and are generally guaranteed by the principals of the borrowing entity.
Consumer loans
– This portfolio segment includes a variety of secured and unsecured personal loans, including automobile loans, loans for household and personal purposes and all other direct consumer installment loans.
Other loans
– Other loans include credit cards, overdrawn checking accounts reclassified to loans and overdraft lines of credit.
As of
June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the composition of the loan portfolio by reporting segment and portfolio segment was as follows:
|
|
June 30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
FUSB
|
|
|
ALC
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
24,306
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
24,306
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
33,326
|
|
|
|
15,430
|
|
|
|
48,756
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
5,972
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,972
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
105,541
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
105,541
|
|
Other
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
38,160
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
38,160
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
6,366
|
|
|
|
80,886
|
|
|
|
87,252
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
214,225
|
|
|
|
96,316
|
|
|
|
310,541
|
|
Less: Unearned interest, fees and deferred cost
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
7,857
|
|
|
|
8,049
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
2,453
|
|
|
|
3,591
|
|
Net loans
|
|
$
|
212,895
|
|
|
$
|
86,006
|
|
|
$
|
298,901
|
|
|
|
December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
FUSB
|
|
|
ALC
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
11,827
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
11,827
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
30,730
|
|
|
|
17,233
|
|
|
|
47,963
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
11,845
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,845
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
83,883
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
83,883
|
|
Other
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
29,377
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29,377
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
7,057
|
|
|
|
76,131
|
|
|
|
83,188
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
175,213
|
|
|
|
93,364
|
|
|
|
268,577
|
|
Less: Unearned interest, fees and deferred cost
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
9,215
|
|
|
|
9,364
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
2,452
|
|
|
|
3,781
|
|
Net loans
|
|
$
|
173,735
|
|
|
$
|
81,697
|
|
|
$
|
255,432
|
|
Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio,
59.5% and 58.0% of the portfolio was concentrated in loans secured by real estate located primarily within a single geographic region of the United States as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
As of June 30, 2016, loans with variable interest rate payment terms represented 56.1% of the Bank
’s loan portfolio, while loans with fixed interest rate payment terms represented 43.9% of the portfolio. As of December 31, 2015, variable rate loans represented 52.1% of the Bank’s portfolio, while fixed rate loans represented 47.9%. At ALC, all loans are originated under fixed interest rate payment terms.
Related Party Loans
In the ordinary course of business, the Bank makes loans to certain officers and directors of the Company, including companies with which they are associated. These loans are made on the same terms as those prevailing for comparable transactions with
non-related parties. Management believes that such loans do not represent more than a normal risk of collectability, nor do they present other unfavorable features. The aggregate balances of such related party loans and commitments as of both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $2.9 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, there was one new loan to these parties, and repayments by active related parties were $71 thousand. During the year ended December 31, 2015, there were no new loans to these related parties, and repayments by active related parties were $0.2 million.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The following tables present changes in the allowance for loan losses by loan portfolio segment and loan type as of
June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. While no portion of the allowance is in any way restricted to any individual loan or group of loans and the entire allowance is available to absorb losses from any and all loans, these tables represent management's allocation of the allowance for loan losses to specific loan categories as of the dates indicated.
|
|
FUSB
|
|
|
|
Six M
onths Ended June
30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& Industrial
|
|
|
Commercial
Real
Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Residential
Real
Estate
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
1,118
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
1,329
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
480
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
Loan receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
38,160
|
|
|
|
136,009
|
|
|
|
6,366
|
|
|
|
33,326
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
214,225
|
|
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,612
|
|
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
37,733
|
|
|
$
|
134,075
|
|
|
$
|
6,366
|
|
|
$
|
33,075
|
|
|
$
|
364
|
|
|
$
|
211,613
|
|
|
|
ALC
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June
30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& Industrial
|
|
|
Commercial
Real
Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Residential
Real
Estate
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,202
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,452
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,511
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,532
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,453
|
|
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,271
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,453
|
|
Loan receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
80,886
|
|
|
|
15,430
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
96,316
|
|
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
80,886
|
|
|
$
|
15,430
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
96,316
|
|
|
|
FUSB & ALC
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June
30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& Industrial
|
|
|
Commercial
Real
Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Residential
Real
Estate
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
1,118
|
|
|
$
|
2,230
|
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
3,781
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,538
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,566
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
703
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3,591
|
|
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
480
|
|
|
$
|
2,288
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
3,231
|
|
Loan receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
38,160
|
|
|
|
136,009
|
|
|
|
87,252
|
|
|
|
48,756
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
310,541
|
|
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,612
|
|
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
37,733
|
|
|
$
|
134,075
|
|
|
$
|
87,252
|
|
|
$
|
48,505
|
|
|
$
|
364
|
|
|
$
|
307,929
|
|
|
|
FUSB
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& Industrial
|
|
|
Commercial
Real
Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Residential
Real
Estate
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
2,810
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,486
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(937
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(1,559
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
888
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
1,019
|
|
Loan receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
29,377
|
|
|
|
107,670
|
|
|
|
7,057
|
|
|
|
30,730
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
175,213
|
|
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
2,018
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,714
|
|
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
28,933
|
|
|
$
|
105,652
|
|
|
$
|
7,057
|
|
|
$
|
30,478
|
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
$
|
172,499
|
|
|
|
ALC
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& Industrial
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,336
|
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,682
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,552
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,739
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,202
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,452
|
|
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,202
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,452
|
|
Loan receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
76,131
|
|
|
|
17,233
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
93,364
|
|
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
76,131
|
|
|
$
|
17,233
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
93,364
|
|
|
|
FUSB & ALC
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
Commercial
& Industrial
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
2,810
|
|
|
$
|
2,450
|
|
|
$
|
767
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,168
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
(2,569
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,591
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
988
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(937
|
)
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
2,230
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,781
|
|
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
888
|
|
|
$
|
2,230
|
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
Loan receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
|
29,377
|
|
|
|
107,670
|
|
|
|
83,188
|
|
|
|
47,963
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
268,577
|
|
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
2,018
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,714
|
|
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
28,933
|
|
|
$
|
105,652
|
|
|
$
|
83,188
|
|
|
$
|
47,711
|
|
|
$
|
379
|
|
|
$
|
265,863
|
|
Credit Quality
The Bank utilizes a
credit grading system that provides a uniform framework for establishing and monitoring credit risk in the loan portfolio. Under this system, each loan is graded based on pre-determined risk metrics and categorized into one of nine risk grades. These risk grades can be summarized into categories described as pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss, as described in further detail below.
|
●
|
Pass (Risk Grades 1-5): Loans in this category include obligations
in which the probability of default is considered low.
|
|
●
|
Special Mention (Risk Grade 6):
Loans in this category exhibit potential credit weaknesses or downward trends deserving Bank management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Bank’s credit position at some future date. Special mention loans are not adversely classified and do not expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. Although a special mention asset has a higher probability of default than pass-rated categories, its default is not imminent.
|
|
●
|
Substandard (Risk Grade 7):
Loans in this category have defined weaknesses that jeopardize the orderly liquidation of debt. A substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any. Normal repayment from the borrower is in jeopardy, although no loss of principal is envisioned. There is a distinct possibility that a partial loss of interest and/or principal will occur if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of substandard assets, does not have to exist in individual assets classified as substandard.
|
|
●
|
Doubtful (Risk Grade 8):
Loans classified as doubtful have all of the weaknesses found in substandard loans, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection of debt in full, based on currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable or improbable. Serious problems exist such that partial loss of principal is likely; however, because of certain important, reasonably specific pending factors that may work to strengthen the assets, the loans’ classification as estimated losses is deferred until a more exact status may be determined. Such pending factors may include proposed merger, acquisition or liquidation procedures, capital injection, perfection of liens on additional collateral and refinancing plans. Loans classified as doubtful may include loans to borrowers that have demonstrated a history of failing to live up to agreements.
|
|
●
|
Loss (Risk Grade 9):
Loans are classified in this category when borrowers are deemed incapable of repayment of unsecured debt. Loans to such borrowers are considered uncollectable and of such little value that continuance as active assets of the Bank is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not prudent to defer writing off these assets, even though partial recovery may be effected in the future.
|
At ALC, because the loan portfolio is more uniform in nature, each loan is categorized into one of two risk grades, depending on whether the loan is considered to be performing or nonperforming. Performing loans are loans that are paying principal and interest in accordance with
a contractual agreement. Nonperforming loans are loans that are either not paying as contractually agreed or that have demonstrated characteristics that indicate a probability of loss.
The tables below illustrate the carrying amount of loans by credit quality indicator as of June
30, 2016.
|
|
FUSB
|
|
|
|
Pass
1-5
|
|
|
Special
Mention
6
|
|
|
Substandard
7
|
|
|
Doubtful
8
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
22,679
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,627
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
24,306
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
31,787
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
33,326
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
5,972
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,972
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
100,898
|
|
|
|
3,841
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
105,541
|
|
Other
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
36,998
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
38,160
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,366
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
205,138
|
|
|
$
|
4,532
|
|
|
$
|
4,555
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
214,225
|
|
|
|
ALC
|
|
|
|
Performing
|
|
|
Nonperforming
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
$
|
15,094
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
15,430
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
79,689
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
80,886
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
94,783
|
|
|
$
|
1,533
|
|
|
$
|
96,316
|
|
The tables below illustrate the carrying amount of loans by credit quality indicator as of December
31, 2015.
|
|
FUSB
|
|
|
|
Pass
1-5
|
|
|
Special
Mention
6
|
|
|
Substandard
7
|
|
|
Doubtful
8
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
9,862
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,965
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
11,827
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
29,252
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30,730
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
11,845
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,845
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
78,647
|
|
|
|
4,315
|
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
83,883
|
|
Other
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
28,170
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29,377
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
6,905
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,057
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
165,175
|
|
|
$
|
5,025
|
|
|
$
|
5,013
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
175,213
|
|
|
|
ALC
|
|
|
|
Performing
|
|
|
Nonperforming
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
$
|
16,964
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
17,233
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
74,743
|
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
76,131
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
91,707
|
|
|
$
|
1,657
|
|
|
$
|
93,364
|
|
The following tables provide an aging analysis of past due loans by class as of June
30, 2016.
|
|
FUSB
|
|
|
|
As of June
30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
30-59
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
60-89
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
90
Days
Or
Greater
|
|
|
Total
Past
Due
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
>
90 Days
And
Accruing
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
24,115
|
|
|
$
|
24,306
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
32,661
|
|
|
|
33,326
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,972
|
|
|
|
5,972
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
105,541
|
|
|
|
105,541
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
38,081
|
|
|
|
38,160
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
6,303
|
|
|
|
6,366
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
|
$
|
998
|
|
|
$
|
213,227
|
|
|
$
|
214,225
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
ALC
|
|
|
|
As of
June 30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
30-59
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
60-89
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
90
Days
Or
Greater
|
|
|
Total
Past
Due
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
>
90 Days
And
Accruing
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
14,915
|
|
|
|
15,430
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
2,450
|
|
|
|
78,436
|
|
|
|
80,886
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
952
|
|
|
$
|
491
|
|
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
|
$
|
2,965
|
|
|
$
|
93,351
|
|
|
$
|
96,316
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The following tables provide an aging analysis of past due loans by class as of December 31, 201
5.
|
|
FUSB
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
30-59
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
60-89
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
90
Days
Or
Greater
|
|
|
Total
Past
Due
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
>
90 Days
And
Accruing
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
11,741
|
|
|
$
|
11,827
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
30,046
|
|
|
|
30,730
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,845
|
|
|
|
11,845
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
83,205
|
|
|
|
83,883
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
29,303
|
|
|
|
29,377
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
6,921
|
|
|
|
7,057
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
719
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
$
|
1,658
|
|
|
$
|
173,555
|
|
|
$
|
175,213
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
ALC
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
30-59
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
60-89
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
90
Days
Or
Greater
|
|
|
Total
Past
Due
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
|
Recorded Investment
>
90 Days
And
Accruing
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
16,684
|
|
|
|
17,233
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
|
2,909
|
|
|
|
73,222
|
|
|
|
76,131
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,056
|
|
|
$
|
773
|
|
|
$
|
1,629
|
|
|
$
|
3,458
|
|
|
$
|
89,906
|
|
|
$
|
93,364
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The following table provides an analysis of non-accruing loans by class as of June
30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
|
|
Loans on Non-Accrual Status
|
|
|
|
June 30
,
201
6
|
|
|
December 31,
201
5
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
339
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
2,619
|
|
|
$
|
3,102
|
|
Impaired Loans
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the related loan agreement. If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan
’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the liquidation of the collateral. All loans of $0.5 million or more that have a credit quality risk grade of seven or above are identified for impairment analysis. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectable.
As of
June 30, 2016, the carrying amount of impaired loans consisted of the following:
|
|
June 30
, 201
6
|
|
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
Related
Allowances
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total loans with no related allowance recorded
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with an allowance recorded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans secured by real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
1,377
|
|
|
$
|
1,377
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Total loans with an allowance recorded
|
|
$
|
2,558
|
|
|
$
|
2,558
|
|
|
$
|
360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans secured by real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
1,377
|
|
|
$
|
1,377
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
2,612
|
|
|
$
|
2,612
|
|
|
$
|
360
|
|
As of December
31, 2015, the carrying amount of impaired loans consisted of the following:
|
|
December 31, 201
5
|
|
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
Related
Allowances
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total loans with no related allowance recorded
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with an allowance recorded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans secured by real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
1,445
|
|
|
$
|
1,445
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Total loans with an allowance recorded
|
|
$
|
2,660
|
|
|
$
|
2,660
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans secured by real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
1,445
|
|
|
$
|
1,445
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
The average net investment in impaired loans and interest income recognized and received on impaired loans
during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
|
|
June 30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Received
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
1,405
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,653
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
|
December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Received
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
$
|
1,493
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Secured by multi-family residential properties
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
3,329
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,117
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued amounted to $2.6
million and $3.1 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. If interest on those loans had been accrued, there would have been $16 thousand and $0.1 million of interest accrued for the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 and year ended December 31, 2015, respectively. Interest income related to these loans as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $10 thousand and $0.3 million, respectively.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Troubled debt restructurings include loans with respect to which concessions have been granted to borrowers that generally would not have otherwise been considered had the borrowers not been experiencing financial difficulty. The concessions may include payment schedule modifications, interest rate reductions, maturity date extensions, modification
s of note structure, principal balance reductions or some combination of these concessions. Restructured loans may involve loans remaining on non-accrual, moving to non-accrual or continuing on accrual status, depending on the individual facts and circumstances of the borrower. Non-accrual restructured loans are included with all other non-accrual loans. In addition, all accruing restructured loans are reported as troubled debt restructurings. Generally, restructured loans remain on non-accrual until the customer has attained a sustained period of repayment performance under the modified loan terms (generally a minimum of six months). However, performance prior to the restructuring, or significant events that coincide with the restructuring, are considered in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms and whether the loan should be returned to or maintained on non-accrual status. If the borrower’s ability to meet the revised payment schedule is not reasonably assured, then the loan remains on non-accrual. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, the Company had $0.5 million and $1.5 million of non-accruing loans that were previously restructured and that remained on non-accrual status. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company had $37 thousand in restructured loans that were restored to accrual status based on a sustained period of repayment performance. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company had no restructured loans that were restored to accrual status based on a sustained period of repayment performance.
The following table provides the number of loans
remaining in each loan category, as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, that the Bank had previously modified in a troubled debt restructuring, as well as the pre- and post-modification principal balance as of each date.
|
|
June 30
, 201
6
|
|
|
December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
Number
of
Loans
|
|
|
Pre-
Modification
Outstanding
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
Post-
Modification
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
Number
of
Loans
|
|
|
Pre-
Modification
Outstanding
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
Post-
Modification
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Loans secured by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction, land development and other land loans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
$
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
2,220
|
|
|
$
|
1,698
|
|
Secured by 1-4 family residential properties
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Secured by non-farm, non-residential properties
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
2,648
|
|
|
$
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
2,649
|
|
|
$
|
1,947
|
|
Restructured loan modifications primarily included maturity date extensions and payment schedule modifications. There were no modifications to principal balances of the loans that were restructured. Accordingly, there was no impact on the Company
’s allowance for loan losses resulting from the modifications. None of the loans that were previously modified in a troubled debt restructuring as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 have defaulted subsequent to modification.
All loans with a principal balance of $0.5 million or more that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring are considered impaired and evaluated individually for impairment. The nature and extent of impairment of restructured loans, including those that have experienced a subsequent payment default, are considered in the determination of an appropriate level of allowance for loan losses. This evaluation resulted in an allowance for loan losses attributable to such restructured loans of
$6 thousand and $1 thousand as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
7.
|
OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED
|
Other real estate and certain other assets acquired in foreclosure are reported at the lower of the investment in the loan or the fair value of the property, less estimated costs to sell. The following table summarizes foreclosed property activity as of the
six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
June 30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
FUSB
|
|
|
ALC
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
5,327
|
|
|
$
|
711
|
|
|
$
|
6,038
|
|
Transfers from loans and fixed assets
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Sales proceeds
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
(880
|
)
|
Gross gains
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Gross losses
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Net gains (losses)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
Impairment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
4,944
|
|
|
$
|
461
|
|
|
$
|
5,405
|
|
|
|
June 30
, 201
5
|
|
|
|
FUSB
|
|
|
ALC
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
6,997
|
|
|
$
|
738
|
|
|
$
|
7,735
|
|
Transfers from loans
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
Sales proceeds
|
|
|
(1,274
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(1,370
|
)
|
Gross gains
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Gross losses
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
Net gains (losses)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
6,509
|
|
|
$
|
659
|
|
|
$
|
7,168
|
|
Valuation adjustments are recorded in other non-interest expense and are primarily post-foreclosure write-downs that are a result of continued declining property values based on updated appraisals or other indications of value, such as offers to purchase.
Fair value less estimated cost to sell of foreclosed residential real estate held by the Company was $1.0 million and $1.1 million as of June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In addition, the Company held $0.2 million in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate that were in the process of foreclosure as of both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
8.
|
INVESTMENT IN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
The Company holds investments in affordable housing projects for which it provides funding as a limited partner and has received tax credits related to its investments in the projects based on its partnership share. The net assets of the partnership consist primarily of apartment complexes
, and the primary liabilities consist of those associated with the operation of the partnership. The Company has determined that this structure requires evaluation as a VIE under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810,
Consolidation.
The Company consolidates one fund in which it has a 99.9% limited partnership interest. Assets recorded by the Company as a result of the consolidation were less than $0.1 million as of both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Short-term borrowings consist of federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements
and short-term Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances. Short-term borrowings totaled $5.4 million and $7.4 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
Federal funds purchased, which represent unsecured lines of credit that generally mature within one to four days, are available to the Company through arrangements with correspondent banks and the Federal Reserve. As of both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there were no federal funds purchased outstanding, and the Company had $18.8 million in available unused lines.
Securities sold under repurchase agreements, which are secured borrowings, generally are reflected at the amount of cash received in
connection with the transaction. The Company may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. The Company monitors the fair value of the underlying securities on a daily basis. Securities sold under repurchase agreements as of both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 totaled $0.4 million.
Short-term FHLB advances are secured borrowings available to the Company as an alternative funding source.
The Company had $5.0 million in outstanding FHLB advances with a maturity date of less than six months as of June 30, 2016. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had $7.0 million in outstanding FHLB advances with a maturity date of less than six months.
The Company uses
FHLB advances as an alternative to funding sources with similar maturities, such as certificates of deposit or other deposit programs. These advances often offer more attractive rates than other mid- and long-term financing options. They are also flexible, allowing the Company to quickly obtain the necessary maturities and rates that best suit its overall asset/liability strategy. The Company had long-term FHLB advances outstanding of $15.0 million and $5.0 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Long-term FHLB advances with remaining terms to maturity of less than 12 months were $5.0 million as of June 30, 2016. There were no long-term FHLB advances with remaining terms to maturity of less than 12 months as of December 31, 2015.
Assets pledged associated with FHLB advances totaled $22.6 million and $14.0 million as of June 30, 2016 and
December 31, 2015, respectively. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had $152.6 million and $152.5 million, respectively, in remaining credit from the FHLB (subject to available collateral).
The provision for income taxes was $0.2
million and $0.7 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate was 23.9% and 29.2%, respectively, for the same periods. The effective tax rate is impacted by recurring permanent differences, such as those associated with bank-owned life insurance and tax-exempt investments and loan income.
The Company had a net deferred tax asset of $
7.1 million and $7.8 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The reduction in the net deferred tax asset resulted primarily from the impact of changes in the fair value of securities available-for-sale.
12.
|
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS
|
The Bank has entered into supplemental compensation benefits agreements with certain directors and executive officers. The measurement of the liability under these agreements includes estimates involving life expectancy, length of time before retirement and the expected returns on the bank-owned life insurance policies used to fund those agreements. Should these estimates prove to be materially wrong, the cost of these agreements could change accordingly. The
related deferred compensation obligation to these directors and executive officers included in other liabilities was $3.6 million as of both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
In addition, non-employee directors may elect to defer payment of all or any
portion of their USBI and FUSB director fees under the United Security Bancshares, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferral Plan”). The Deferral Plan, which was ratified by shareholders at the annual meeting held on May 11, 2004, permits non-employee directors to invest their directors’ fees and to receive the adjusted value of the deferred amounts in cash and/or shares of USBI’s common stock. The Company uses shares held as treasury stock to satisfy stock-based obligations. A total of 112,282 shares and 103,571 shares were deferred under the Deferral Plan as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Cash deferrals under the Deferral Plan were less than $0.1 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
In accordance with the Company
’s 2013 Incentive Plan, stock option awards have been granted to certain employees and non-employee directors. The awards were granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of USBI’s common stock on the date of grant and have vesting periods ranging from one to three years, with 10-year contractual terms. The Company expects to use shares held as treasury stock to satisfy share option exercises. Currently, the Company holds a sufficient number of treasury shares to satisfy potential exercises.
The Company recognizes the cost of services received in exchange for stock option awards based on the grant date fair value of the award, with compensation expense recognized on a straight-line b
asis over the award’s vesting period. The fair value of outstanding awards was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the assumptions noted in the table below. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock.
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
Expected term
|
|
7.5 years
|
|
|
7.5 years
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
25.25
|
%
|
|
|
54.04
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
The following table summarizes the Company's stock option activity for the periods presented.
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30
, 201
6
|
|
|
June 30
, 201
5
|
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
175,550
|
|
|
$
|
8.17
|
|
|
|
83,400
|
|
|
$
|
8.09
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
97,000
|
|
|
|
8.30
|
|
|
|
96,150
|
|
|
|
8.23
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
8.09
|
|
Options outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
272,550
|
|
|
$
|
8.21
|
|
|
|
177,050
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
Options exercisable, end of period
|
|
|
175,550
|
|
|
$
|
8.17
|
|
|
|
81,900
|
|
|
$
|
8.09
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense related to stock options totaled $0.1 million for both six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding (calculated as the
amount by which the market value of underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option) was $0.1 million as of June 30, 2016 and less than $0.1 million as of June 30, 2015.
14.
|
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
On April 1, 2016, FUSB entered into a forward interest rate swap contract on a variable rate FHLB advance (indexed to three-month LIBOR) with a total notional amount
of $10.0 million. The interest rate swap contract was designated as a derivative instrument in a cash flow hedge under
ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging,
with the objective of protecting the quarterly interest rate payments on the FHLB advance from the risk of variability of those payments resulting from changes in the three-month LIBOR interest rate throughout the seven-year period beginning on April 5, 2016 and ending on April 5, 2023. Under the swap arrangement, which became effective on April 5, 2016, FUSB will pay a fixed interest rate of 1.46% and receive a variable interest rate based on three-month LIBOR on the total notional amount of $10.0 million, with quarterly net settlements.
No ineffectiveness related to the interest rate swap designated as a cash
flow hedge was recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016. The accumulated net after-tax loss related to the effective cash flow hedge included in accumulated other comprehensive income totaled $140 thousand as of June 30, 2016. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to this derivative are reclassified to other interest expense as interest payments are made on FUSB’s variable rate FHLB advance. During the next twelve months, FUSB estimates that $68 thousand will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
In 2014, FUSB entered into three separate interest rate cap agreements to mitigate risks assoc
iated with increases in interest rates on an aggregate notional amount of $40 million. The interest rate caps qualify as derivatives but were not designated as hedging instruments. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the instruments are included in results of operations. Under the three agreements, the Company paid an up-front premium totaling approximately $126 thousand, in return for the ability to receive cash flows if interest rates rise above a strike rate indexed to three-month LIBOR. The agreements have contractual terms that mature at various dates in 2017. As of June 30, 2016, the strike rate had not been achieved on any of the three agreements, and accordingly, the Company has received no cash flows associated with the agreements. Since the inception of the agreements, on a quarterly basis, the Company has recorded the current fair value of the derivatives within other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, with changes in the fair value included in interest expense on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, 2016, the fair value of each of the three derivative agreements was zero. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, approximately $3 thousand was recognized as interest expense associated with the agreements.
Under
ASC Topic 280,
Segment Reporting
, certain information is disclosed for the two reportable operating segments of the Company, FUSB and ALC. The reportable segments were determined using the internal management reporting system. These segments comprise the Company’s and FUSB’s significant subsidiaries. The accounting policies for each segment are the same as those described in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. The segment results include certain overhead allocations and intercompany transactions that were recorded at current market prices. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated to determine the consolidated balances. The results for the two reportable segments of the Company are included in the tables below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FUSB
|
|
|
ALC
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
For the three months ended
June
30
, 201
6
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
3,683
|
|
|
$
|
3,231
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,917
|
|
Provision (reduction in reserve) for loan losses
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
706
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
1,120
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
(816
|
)
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
|
4,463
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
7,255
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
(672
|
)
|
|
|
606
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
(672
|
)
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
Other significant items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
603,722
|
|
|
$
|
89,758
|
|
|
$
|
83,936
|
|
|
$
|
(175,662
|
)
|
|
$
|
601,754
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
213,085
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
213,165
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
|
290,473
|
|
|
|
86,006
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(77,578
|
)
|
|
|
298,901
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
78,511
|
|
|
|
(78,511
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Fixed asset additions
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
Total interest income from external customers
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
4,267
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,478
|
|
Total interest income from affiliates
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(1,039
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
7,281
|
|
|
$
|
6,291
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
13,578
|
|
Provision (reduction in reserve) for loan losses
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
(1,474
|
)
|
|
|
2,469
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
|
8,798
|
|
|
|
4,904
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
14,321
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
(1,195
|
)
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
604
|
|
|
$
|
539
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
(1,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
779
|
|
Other significant items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed asset additions
|
|
|
3,561
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,578
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
Total interest income from external customers
|
|
|
6,335
|
|
|
|
8,339
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
14,674
|
|
Total interest income from affiliates
|
|
|
2,048
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(2,053
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FUSB
|
|
|
ALC
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
For the three months ended
June 30
, 201
5
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
3,991
|
|
|
$
|
3,176
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7,170
|
|
Provision (reduction in reserve) for loan losses
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
|
4,386
|
|
|
|
2,477
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
7,107
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
911
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
(979
|
)
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
647
|
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
|
$
|
815
|
|
|
$
|
(979
|
)
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
Other significant items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
562,900
|
|
|
$
|
84,139
|
|
|
$
|
81,816
|
|
|
$
|
(168,205
|
)
|
|
$
|
560,650
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
246,096
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
246,176
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
|
237,357
|
|
|
|
79,971
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(72,335
|
)
|
|
|
244,993
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
76,488
|
|
|
|
(76,488
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
Fixed asset additions
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Total interest income from external customers
|
|
|
3,640
|
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,735
|
|
Total interest income from affiliates
|
|
|
918
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(921
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
7,835
|
|
|
$
|
6,037
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
13,877
|
|
Provision (reduction in reserve) for loan losses
|
|
|
(970
|
)
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
2,206
|
|
|
|
(2,313
|
)
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
|
8,667
|
|
|
|
4,970
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
14,084
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
2,149
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
(2,017
|
)
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,514
|
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
$
|
1,679
|
|
|
$
|
(2,017
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,610
|
|
Other significant items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed asset additions
|
|
$
|
1,610
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,859
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
Total interest income from external customers
|
|
|
7,217
|
|
|
|
7,838
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15,056
|
|
Total interest income from affiliates
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1,805
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
16
.
|
GUARANTEES, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
The Bank
’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party for commitments to make loans and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. For interest rate swap transactions and commitments to purchase or sell securities for forward delivery, the contract or notional amounts do not represent exposure to credit loss. The Bank controls the credit risk of these derivative instruments through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures. Certain derivative contracts have credit risk for the carrying value plus the amount to replace such contracts in the event of counterparty default. All of the Bank’s financial instruments are held for risk management and not for trading purposes. During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, there were no credit losses associated with derivative contracts.
In the normal course of business, there are outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit, letters of credit and others
that are not included in the consolidated financial statements. The financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of amounts recognized in the financial statements. A summary of these commitments and contingent liabilities is presented below:
|
|
June
30
,
201
6
|
|
|
December
31,
201
5
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
683
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
45,439
|
|
|
$
|
61,427
|
|
Standby letters of credit are contingent commitments issued by the Bank generally to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The Bank has recourse against the customer for any amount that it is required to pay to a third party under a standby letter of credit. Revenues are recognized over the lives of the standby letters of credit. As of
June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the potential amount of future payments that the Bank could be required to make under its standby letters of credit, which represent the Bank’s total credit risk in this category, is included in the table above.
A commitment
to extend credit is an agreement to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon the extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income-producing commercial properties.
Commitments to purchase securities for delayed delivery require the Bank to purchase a specified security at a specified price for delivery on a specified date. Similarly, commitments to sell securities for delayed delivery require the Bank to sell a specified security at a specified price for delivery on a specified date. Market risk arises from potential movements in security values and interest rates between the commitment and delivery dates.
As of both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there were no outstanding commitments to purchase securities for delayed delivery and no outstanding commitments to sell securities for delayed delivery.
Litigation
The Company is a party to
certain ordinary course litigation, and the Company intends to vigorously defend itself in all such litigation. In the opinion of the Company, based on review and consultation with legal counsel, the outcome of such ordinary course litigation should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or results of operations.
17.
|
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
The Company follows the provisions of
ASC Topic 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The assumptions used in the estimation of the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments are detailed below. The following disclosures should not be considered a surrogate of the liquidation value of the Company, but rather represent a good-faith estimate of the increase or decrease in value of financial instruments held by the Company since purchase, origination or issuance.
Fair Value Hierarchy
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods, including market, income and cost approaches. Based on these approaches, the Company often utilizes certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk generally and/or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market-corroborated or generally unobservable. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide the following information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
|
●
|
Level 1
— Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in active exchange markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
●
|
Level 2
— Valuations for assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations are obtained from third-party pricing services for identical or similar assets or liabilities.
|
|
●
|
Level 3
— Valuations for assets and liabilities that are derived from other valuation methodologies, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, and not based on market exchange, dealer or broker-traded transactions. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities.
|
The Company rarely transfers assets and liabilities measured at fair value between Level 1 and Level 2 measurements. Trading account assets and securities available-for-sale may be periodically transferred to or from Level 3 valuation based on management
’s conclusion regarding the best method of pricing for an individual security. Such transfers are accounted for as if they occurred at the beginning of a reporting period. There were no such transfers during the six months ended June 30, 2016 or the year ended December 31, 2015.
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
Securities
Available-for-Sale
Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include exchange-traded equities. Level 2 securities include U.S. Treasury and agency securities, mortgage-backed agency securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions and certain corporate, asset-backed and other securities. Level 2 fair values are obtained from quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics. In certain cases, where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.
Interest Rate Derivative Agreements
Interest rate derivative agreements are used by the Company to mitigate risk associated with changes in interest rates.
The fair value of these agreements is based on information obtained from third-party financial institutions. This information is periodically evaluated by the Company and, as necessary, corroborated against other third-party valuations. The Company classifies these derivative assets within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
The following table presents assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of
June
30
, 201
6
Using
|
|
|
|
Totals
At
June
30
,
201
6
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets For
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Investment securities, available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
112,516
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
112,516
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
53,311
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
53,311
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
10,929
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,929
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other liabilities - derivatives
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 201
5
Using
|
|
|
|
Totals
At
December
31,
201
5
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets For
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Investment securities, available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
135,494
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
135,494
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
45,509
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
45,509
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
14,998
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
14,998
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored agencies
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate notes
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other assets - derivatives
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Fair Value Measurements on a Non-recurring Basis
Impaired Loans
Loans that are considered impaired are loans for which, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans can be measured based on the present value of expected payments using the loan
’s original effective rate as the discount rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling cost if the loan is collateral-dependent. For the Company, the fair value of impaired loans is primarily measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loans (typically real estate). The Company determines the fair value of the collateral based on independent appraisals performed by qualified licensed appraisers. The appraisals may include a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches, including comparable sales and income approaches. Appraised values are discounted for estimated costs to sell and may be discounted further based on management’s knowledge of the collateral, changes in market conditions since the most recent appraisal and/or management’s knowledge of the borrower and the borrower’s business. Such discounts by management are subjective and are typically significant unobservable inputs for determining fair value. Impaired loans are evaluated by management for additional impairment at least quarterly and are adjusted accordingly.
OREO
OREO consists of properties obtained through foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans and is recorded at the lower of the loan
’s carrying amount or the fair value of the property, less estimated cost to sell. Estimates of fair value are generally based on third-party appraisals of the property and are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The appraisals are sometimes discounted based on management’s knowledge of the property and/or changes in market conditions from the date of the most recent appraisal. Such discounts are typically significant unobservable inputs for determining fair value.
The following table presents the balances of impaired loans and OREO measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of
June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of
June
30
, 201
6
Using
|
|
|
|
Totals
At
June
30
,
201
6
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets For
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
OREO
|
|
|
5,405
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,405
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 201
5
Using
|
|
|
|
Totals
At
December 31,
201
5
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
For Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
2,350
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,350
|
|
OREO
|
|
|
6,038
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,038
|
|
Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
The following table presents information regarding assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of June
30, 2016. The table includes the valuation techniques and the significant unobservable inputs utilized. The range of each unobservable input and the weighted average within the range utilized as of June 30, 2016 are both included. Following the table is a description of the valuation technique and the sensitivity of the technique to changes in the significant unobservable input.
|
|
Level 3 Significant Unobservable Input Assumptions
|
|
|
Fair Value
June
30
,
201
6
|
|
|
Valuation Technique
|
|
Unobservable
Input
|
|
Quantitative
Range
of Unobservable
Inputs
(Weighted
Average)
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
Non-recurring fair value measurements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
|
Multiple data points, including discount to appraised value of collateral based on recent market activity
|
|
Appraisal comparability adjustment (discount)
|
|
9
% - 10%
(
9.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OREO
|
|
$
|
5,405
|
|
|
Discount to appraised value of property based on recent market activity for sales of similar properties
|
|
Appraisal comparability adjustment (discount)
|
|
9
% - 10%
(9
.5%)
|
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans are valued based on multiple data points indicating the fair value for each loan. The primary data point is the appraisal value of the underlying collateral, to which a discount is applied. Management establishes this discount or comparability adjustment based on recent sales of similar property types. As liquidity in the market increases or decreases, the comparability adjustment and the resulting asset valuation are impacted.
OREO
OREO under a binding contract for sale is valued based on contract price. If no sales contract is pending for a specific property, management establishes a comparability adjustment to the appraised value based on historical activity, considering proceeds for properties sold versus the corresponding appraised value. Increases or decreases in realization for properties sold impact the comparability adjustment for similar assets remaining on the balance sheet.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
ASC Topic 825, Financial
Instruments
, requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the face of the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:
Cash, due from banks and federal funds sold:
The carrying amount of cash, due from banks and federal funds sold approximates fair value.
Federal Home Loan Bank stock:
Based on the redemption provision of the FHLB, the stock has no quoted market value and is carried at cost.
Investment securities:
Fair values of investment securities are based on quoted market prices where available. If quoted market prices are not available, estimated fair values are based on market prices of comparable instruments.
Derivative instruments:
The fair value of derivative instruments is based on information obtained from a third-party financial institution. This information is periodically evaluated by the Company and, as necessary, corroborated against other third-party information.
Accrued interest receivable and payable:
The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates fair value.
Loans, net:
For variable-rate loans, fair values are based on carrying values. Fixed-rate commercial loans, other installment loans and certain real estate mortgage loans are valued using discounted cash flows. The discount rate used to determine the present value of these loans is based on interest rates currently being charged by the Company on comparable loans as to credit risk and term.
Demand and savings deposits:
The fair values of demand deposits are equal to the carrying value of such deposits. Demand deposits include non-interest-bearing demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts and money market demand accounts.
Time deposits:
The fair values of relatively short-term time deposits are equal to their carrying values. Discounted cash flows are used to value long-term time deposits. The discount rate used is based on interest rates currently being offered by the Company on comparable deposits as to amount and term.
Short-term borrowings:
These borrowings may consist of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and the floating rate borrowings from the FHLB account. Due to the short-term nature of these borrowings, fair values approximate carrying values.
Long-term debt:
The fair value of this debt is estimated using discounted cash flows based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Off-balance sheet instruments:
The carrying amount of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit approximates fair value. The carrying amount of the off-balance sheet financial instruments is based on fees currently charged to enter into such agreements.
The estimated fair value and related carrying or notional amounts, as well as the level within the fair value hierarchy, of the Company
’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, were as follows:
|
|
June
30
, 201
6
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
42,725
|
|
|
$
|
42,725
|
|
|
$
|
42,725
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
179,613
|
|
|
|
179,613
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
179,613
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
33,552
|
|
|
|
33,769
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
33,769
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
298,901
|
|
|
|
297,242
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
297,242
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
495,618
|
|
|
|
496,015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
496,015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
5,352
|
|
|
|
5,352
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,352
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
14,998
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
14,998
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other liabilities - derivatives
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
December 31, 201
5
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
44,072
|
|
|
$
|
44,072
|
|
|
$
|
44,072
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
198,843
|
|
|
|
198,843
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
198,843
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
32,359
|
|
|
|
32,184
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
32,184
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
255,432
|
|
|
|
256,392
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
256,392
|
|
Other assets
– derivatives
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
479,258
|
|
|
|
478,833
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
478,833
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
7,354
|
|
|
|
7,352
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,352
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4,977
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,977
|
|
|
|
—
|
|