Ultimate Franchise Systems Inc (CE) (ULFS) Quote

Good question!!!

Is this dead? or is it worth holding on to the shares?

Check your private messages...

Hi

I know what they are trying. My shares are restricted under the Pink sheet 114 rule so I need to have them derestricted before I can sell them. They are trying to Con me into using their transfer agent to do the deal. I pay the money then they will say that to complete the sale of my shares I have to pay the IRS TAX on the shares because I did not fill out the No resident TAX form.
Its a complicated Scam relying on the greed and naivity on the Mark. I have done alot of reseach and have spoken at one time with Brenda and some others involved.

I will just let them phone me while the British police try to trace them on the phone and email.

I would like to know if you know if I can have my shares derestricted because of the time elapsed since purchase without a letter from the CEO.

Thanks for your help.

AJ

One more thing… If these people who contacted you ask for a fee, don't pay it. If any money is legitimately owed you, you shouldn't have to pay anything to receive it.

That's true. UFLS was the victim of a corporate hijacking back in, I think, 2010.

Hi The Man said he was Neptune Mergers and aquacissions and had to infprm me that ULFS had been taken over illegally and that after a court case compensation was due to me.

I'm one of a few hundred people who were scammed out of money for shares restricted under the Pink sheet rules. I have not been able to have them changed to free shares and subsequently price has bottomed.

Unfortunately, the SEC won't intervene in Rule 144 disputes. It seems unfair, but if they did that, it would take up a lot of their time, because they'd have to go to court. That is also an option for you, though I doubt it'd be worth it.

I have just had someone saying they are from a company instructed to pay compensation.

What did that person say specifically? if someone is bringing a class action, then participating in it should be free. Be wary if anyone asks you to pay some kind of fee, or make a "donation".

HI
I'm one of a few hundred people who were scammed out of money for shares restricted under the Pink sheet rules. I have not been able to have them changed to free shares and subsequently price has bottomed. I lost thousands of pounds. I have just had someone saying they are from a company instructed to pay compensation. HA. I have had nothing but grief from ULFS. So if you have details on Neptune or any Government compensation scheme for the hostile take over then please let me know as you seem to know everything about ULFS.

AJ

Speaking of Brenda Hamilton:

http://www.pumpsanddumps.com/2014/02/just-short-minute-long-short-of-reg-sho.html

Money laundering? Seriously? Would you care to offer proof of that? Or even something that passes for "evidence"?

Simply saying it isn't enough. You'd know that if you were a lawyer, like Brenda.

So for good measure SEC shut ULFS down?

Okkaayyyyy!! If you say so

ULFS was a money laundering outfit assisted by Brenda Hamilton lawyer in Boca Raton

enough said!

And you are once again wrong. The SEC merely zapped a bunch of dormant shell companies. They've done that in the past as well, most notably in May 2012, when they took down 379 of them.

As to Brenda Hamilton, this is what Duane Thompson of the SEC had to say about her in sworn testimony.

Next in the lineup, Your Honor, is Miss Brenda Hamilton. Now, Miss Hamilton is a securities lawyer in
20 Boca Raton.
21 And the evidence will show that in 2010, Marc
22 Jablon approached her to provide an opinion letter to
23 OTC Markets on behalf of Big Apple's clients.
24 OTC Markets runs a quotation platform for microcap
25 and penny stock companies, and it has various levels of
quotations. It has Grey Market quotations which involve
2 companies that don't provide any type of disclosures. And
3 then Pink Sheets is for companies that do provide some
4 disclosures.
5 Penny stock companies typically aren't SEC
6 reporting, but OTC Markets or Pink Sheet companies does
7 require that they provide certain disclosures that
8 basically track what they would provide to the SEC.
9 So the evidence will show that in May of 2010,
10 Marc Jablon approached Miss Hamilton after Pink Sheets had
11 refused to take opinions regarding disclosures made by
12 Big Apple's clients. They refused to take the opinions
13 from two other lawyers that Big Apple had referred to those
14 clients.
15 The evidence will show that those two attorneys
16 were part of a string of attorneys that Big Apple had
17 referred to its clients to provide these opinions so that
18 the company stock could be quoted on Pink Sheets and that
19 that string of attorneys is all under some type of cloud.
20 They've all either been barred by Pink Sheets
21 itself, banned from practicing before the SEC, or facing
22 some type of bar disciplinary proceeding.
23 But Brenda Hamilton was different. The evidence
24 will show that Miss Hamilton would not bless disclosures
25 that Big Apple had prepared for its client, and the
particular client we'll be focusing on is a company called
2 Cloud Centric.
3 But Miss Hamilton wouldn't bless disclosures that
4 Big Apple had prepared. She also noted red flags. Those
5 red flags were the absence of any disclosure in the
6 disclosures that Big Apple had prepared concerning
7 Big Apple's receipt of so much Cyberkey stock and its sales
8 of that stock into the market without registration pursuant
9 to the same purported exemption that this Court in the
10 liability phase found did not apply, did not justify
11 Big Apple sales of unregistered Cyberkey stock.
12 The evidence will also show that Big Apple and
13 Marc Jablon first tried to silence Miss Hamilton and then
14 tried to punish her after she wouldn't go along with the
15 program.
16 This evidence, we submit, will make crystal clear
17 the need for strong injunctive relief and penny stock bars
18 against Mr. Jablon and his companies.

I'm afraid you have your facts badly wrong. When UFLS lawfully changed its domicile from Nevada to Florida, its Nevada corporate status was revoked. A group specializing in grabbing dormant public companies and turning them to their own uses reinstated the Nevada shell and petitioned a local court for custodianship, without even attempting to contact the rightful owners.

UFLS went to court in Florida, and won.

That took some time. Because of the uncertainly surrounding the ownership of the shell, and the status of the shares circulating in the public market, the SEC suspended. UFLS was not their only target: along with it, they suspended a number of other public companies that had been reinstated in Nevada by the same group.

The Arizona law firm created by that group subsequently closed its doors.

Brenda Hamilton toxic securities lawyer!

You sent some link of SARS? And some gossip links from 2009?

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)???

What the heck does SARS have to do with ULFS? )Other than that they are both toxic)

ULFS was delisted by SEC in a scam scoop targeting about 25 shell lawyers. Brenda Hamiltion is one of the 25 lawyers. See SEC link

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2014/34-71465.pdf

I identified about 8 to 10 companies out of 255 the SEC shut down where Brenda Hamilton was directly involved and even that link you provided confirms what Im saying. Once Brenda Hamilton gets involved the company sooner or later gets slammed by the SEC!! Proof is in the links above!

Brenda Hamilton Boca Raton full of hot air!

BEWARE CON ARTIST AND FRAUDSTER AT WORK!!

Her other deals she cooked up

NutraFuels Form S-1 Registration Statement
DLPM Receives DTC Eligibility
Puissant Industries, Inc. (PSSS) Receives DTC Eligibility


Plus allot of BS news Brenda Hamilton likes to toot her own horn!

Becomes Effective
Hamilton & Associates Releases Year-End Results for Dodd Frank 101
Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney Ranked in Top 1 Percent of LinkedIn Profiles
Scottish Spirits, Inc. Announces the Engagement of Hamilton & Associates and Brenda Hamilton, Securities Attorney

Blond skank at loose BEWARE!!!

Opportunist Magazine Interviews Securities Lawyer Brenda Hamilton

I wonder how many other deals she defrauded! This woman is a 1 person wrecking crew!!

Brenda Hamilton Lawyer FL screwed all ULF investors and shareholders!

She hijacked the company and moved jurisdictions improperly without shareholder vote!

ULFS: Suspended by SEC

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2014/34-71465.pdf

I remember this one. the criminals at minimar tried to hijack this company and got caught

for those doing the DD on what I said

Welcome

ULTIMATE FRANCHISE.... old but good!
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Ultimate-Franchise-Systems-iw-2859495650.html?x=0&.v=1

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

i will try out for mod.

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

currently .008

ULFS looking for a reverse merger?

hello all. we've seen some action on another board concerning ULFS http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=54776934

.015 then .19? whats up here?

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

05/12/2010 All Pending Motions (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Delaney, Kathleen E.)
Petitioner Shareholder Advocates LLC's (1)Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Brenda L. Hamilton, Christopher Swartz, and Tim Murray Should Not be Held in Contempt for Violating this Court's 3/22/10 Order Appointing Shareholder Advocates LLC Custodian of Ultimate Franchise Systems Inc., and (2) Motion for Preliminary Injunction Directing Brenda L. Hamilton, Christopher Swartz, Tim Murray, and the Nevada Secretary of State to Withdraw the 4/2/10 Articles of Conversion Purporting to Convert Ultimate Franchise Systems Inc. from a Nevada Corporation to a Florida Corporation...Ultimate Franchise Systems Inc.'s Motion to Quash Service of Shareholder Advocates LLC's Application for Appointment of Custodian

Minutes
05/12/2010 9:00 AM
- Rhonda Keaveney, member, present as representative of Petitioner. Arguments by counsel regarding whether certification of service was proper as Petitioner served officers by certified mailing. As service was not adequate, COURT ORDERED Respondent’s Motion to Quash GRANTED; therefore, Petitioner's Motions for Order to Show Cause and for Preliminary Injunction are MOOT. Ms. Ginapp to prepare Order.

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

i'd say that's still up in the air at this point. pink sheets has to list something.

so let's say the court does end up agreeing and it goes back to the old owners who had previously abandoned shareholders - is everybody supposed to jump for joy because instead of somebody actually doing something for shareholders here and merging this with an australian coffee company, it would go back to being abandoned??

hooray.

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

tell that to the SEC and PINKSHEETS that refuses to recognize it

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

ouch read this

http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/gddh8h

no they are not, in fact they were booted and the company returned to the rightful directors control

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

Post Unavailable

Additional Information

here are the details

http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/gddh8h

minama got caught redhanded hijacking it