RedHawk Holdings Corporation (CE) (SNDD) Quote

Wow ! Look at that volume today !

L2 ?

L3 ?

Lunknown ?

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

Loading….

L2 anyone ? LMAO

So... What are you all waiting for now???

Geeeezzz...


A big fat nothing.


...


.

What settlement?

Anything Klug manages to collect, and I doubt he ever collects anything, he's keeping it for himself. Why would he share it with a bunch of dummies he lied to and scammed??




..


.

I would like to recoup the investment my brother made in whatever this revoked delisted nightmare is called

It seems like you are the only one worried about not getting your compensated when settlement occurs. Considering SNDD shares are worthless to you, I will gladly take any SNDD shares you have…

How did you know i was talking about you?

Who said anything about revenge? My only point was if there’s going to be a settlement, the shareholders should have participation in that settlement and get their portion of the proceeds.

If Mr. Klugg hasn’t bothered to file in the last several years, what makes you think that he’s going to include money for shareholders in any settlement?

Any wagers on what story the 5th stooge will create? The first 4 were utter failures. Their employer is getting no ROI and is scratching his head trying to come up with something that will work.
How can we get everyone to sue Mr. Klug? Revenge is getting costly.

I wonder how many shares are out there. I still have 5 million. How about you guys?

THATS RIGHT I TAKE SOME !! HELL HE THE DUMMY FOR KEEP POSTING LIKE WE DONT KNOW WE STOPPED TRADING! WOW WHAT A DUMMY

Please transfer those shares. I think Sony wants some, too. I take 75% of your holding and give the rest to Sony. Thanks

The psychosis runs deep in DeadHawk. For those that claim to have spoken directly to Gerard, how does that make you feel to be told Redhawk will return to trading but is now revoked, delisted, and your shares are completely worthless, absent a shareholder derivative lawsuit against Gerard in his capacity as CEO and against the “company”, which publicly no longer exists ?

Is this where stupid things are posted like -

Redhawk !

Right on !

Write on !

YA TRANSFER THEM TO MY ACCOUNT ALSO! REDHAWK

Could you transfer them to my account? Pls

Yes, except they are…ready ?

Untradeable

Revoked

And worthless

Still waiting for your reply:
May I have the “worthless” SNDD shares since they have no value to you. Thanks

Several weeks ago my sister unearthed the connection between my brother, his business dealings with OMNI post Katrina and Gerard Klugg, post the OMNI FEMA contract.

Shareholders should stand together and go after him for damages, certainly intervene in the big lawsuit if it looks like he may actually collect anything

SHAREHOLDERS, own this company

Well, they did, it’s now revoked, untradeable, and quite worthless

"It takes a very certain kind of lowlife to screw over friends."

Pray tell...when did you discover that your brother and Darcy Klugg were friends? I trust that it was after your fourth post on IHUB when you expressed interest in seizing Darcy Klugg's assets:

"Does the CEO have any assets to go after?" By the way, I added the question mark for you.

It is certainly an evolving story. I sort of can't wait for the next episode.

If they are “worthless”, can I have them?

They are clueless. That much is obvious.

But..but..Magical unicorns, fairies and pixie dust will make the shares worth $billions ..."soon"
I hate to break this to you again, but the shares are worthless, revoked, and untradable

Then you shouldn't have any problem giving them away then.

I am not surprised as most former Redhawk, shareholders here still believe their shares are worth something, refusing to believe that their shares are revoked untradable, and now worthless

I hate to break this to you again, but the shares are worthless, revoked, and untradable

It's such a great story, its too bad not a single person here on this board believes it.

If they are “dead” and worthless, may I have your SNDD shares??? Please

My BROTHER, , remember, my brother passed away and left his estate to my sister and myself. My brother knew Gerard Klugg from OMNI and bought into this because of his relationship with G. Darcy himself.

It takes a very certain kind of lowlife to screw over friends.

Glad to see you finally accept Redhawk as a “dead” stock

STILL TALKING ABOUT A DEAD STOCK

DeadHawk is what this should be named

That's how these Stinky-Pinkies operate, in one way or another.
I am not pleased thinking about Klugg possibly using Redhawk shares as his personal piggy bank

There are toxic lenders that would hand him big cash for shares @ a big discount. The sudden revelation of 950 million in "future" revenue would have been good for a pump to unload them before revocation. Klug could have unloaded a shitload himself through friends and relatives. Seen that a million times.

And then there is, what else was omitted?? Never mentioned?

And that is why, along with the obvious fraud, and fraud by omission, there were no financials filed and there will never be a form 10.


..


.

I never thought about that ! The shares outstanding could be any number between 1 and whatever pleases Gerard D Klugg

I am not pleased thinking about Klugg possibly using Redhawk shares as his personal piggy bank

I'm not talking about judgment money. It doesn't exist.


..


.

I never said N95 had money dummy. This is from the last Q posted. How many more shares did Klug unload in the year or more he didn't file??


ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

Sales of Securities

During the quarter ended March 31, 2021, we issued the following securities:

? In separate transactions, we issued a total of 76,733,153 shares of common stock to different holders of certain 2019 Variable Rate Convertible Notes upon the conversion of $181,000 of principal amount of such notes, plus accrued interest; and

? We issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock to holders of certain 2020 Fixed Rate Convertible Notes upon the conversion of $50,000 of principal amount of such notes, plus accrued interest; and

? We issued 55,916,667 shares of common stock to certain related party note holders of certain interest free advances upon the conversion of $142,000 of principal amount of such advances; and

?
We issued 6,250,000 shares of common stock to certain members of our board of directors as compensation.

We claim an exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act for such issuances upon conversion of our convertible securities, as the securities were exchanged by us with our existing security holders in a transaction where no commission or other remuneration was paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting such exchange.

?
During the quarter ended March 31, 2021, we sold $175,500 in principal amount of new 2019 Variable Rate Convertible Notes. These notes have a variable conversion rate based on the price of the Company’s common stock.


? Subsequent to March 31, 2021, we sold $150,000 in principal amount of new 2019 Fixed Rate Convertible Notes (See Note 7 in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included above), and in connection therewith, warrants to purchase 3,750,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 per share. The proceeds were used to repay the principal balance outstanding, including accrued interest, on the remaining 2016 Fixed Rate Convertible Note. If the warrants to purchase 3,750,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 per share were exercised in full, the maximum number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise thereof would be 3,750,000 shares of common stock.


The issuances described above were exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2), Rule 506 of Regulation D and/or Regulation S of the Securities Act, since the foregoing issuances did not involve a public offering, the recipients took the securities for investment and not resale, we took take appropriate measures to restrict transfer, and the recipients were (a) “accredited investors”; (b) had access to similar documentation and information as would be required in a Registration Statement under the Securities Act; (c) were non U.S. persons; and/or (d) were officers or directors of the Company. The securities are subject to transfer restrictions, and the certificates evidencing the securities contain an appropriate legend stating that such securities have not been registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold absent registration or pursuant to an exemption therefrom. The securities were not registered under the Securities Act and such securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an exemption from registration under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws.


https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1353406/000175392621000163/g082185_10q.htm

Attorney says only way Redhawk can collect is to somehow pierce the corporate veil, which in this case doesn’t look likely, however no one knows. These lawsuits cost a fortune to litigate and I have to wonder where Klugg gets the money to finance all his litigation. His litigation success is poor, though I must admit I only know what is available in the public domain.

When the attorney says to walk away from it, I take the professional advice we paid for, though we are both in agreement should Redhawk get in a position to collect, we should intervene and ask the court to escrow every penny of the funds, for an equitable distribution amongst the owners of this company and certainly out of the hands of Gerard Darcy Klugg

Klugg is 72 years old and not very likely to achieve any significant future success, based on age and health. He doesn’t look like he is overly interested in his health, based on publicly published photos available on the internet

It's good to see you finally admit N 95 had money.

Wasn't talking about that money.

Clown.


..


.

What money, clown? N-95, AEG and Coastal didn’t pay anything

Yes... Fraud by omission, and the "letter" with the 950 million future revenue, when Klug already new N95 defaulted on the deal was most definitely fraud. And another issue... Who knows where the money went?? Klugs retirement account?


..


.

You think it’s really fraud ?

Very good day on the water !

Both... Things went bad, and he lied, committed fraud to try and cover.



..


.

Do you think he scammed on purpose or he was “just a man who circumstances were beyond his control” ?

Anyone breathing air could have made millions at OMNI during the FEMA funded Katrina clean up.

Anyone


In other news, we are about to pull out to catch lots of fish in the gulf in about 5 hours.

Redhawk is DEADHawk. Give it up, bag holders should move along, frame their statements and chalk it up to stupidity

The hot air comes from Klug and his ignorant supporters that can't see; refuse to see, they got had by a scammer named Klug.


..


.

You will be waiting a very long time.

I am blessed with former Omni shareholders that have reached out to me letting me know how and why they got into Redhawk hoping for another Omni. Redhawk will never be another Omni and Redhawk doesn’t have a fat contract with FEMA.

Please purchase just one hour of a securities attorney’s time and you will feel better knowing what Redhawk really is, and this will allow you to accept reality and move onward with your life.

Your family will appreciate it

. Sounds like more hot air and speculation that we have come to expect from you.
I will wait for the audited fins.

The only shareholder remaining is Mr. Klugg

Everyone of our public shares are revoked, gone, extinguished, delisted, etc.

Worthless at best

I think it would be wise to consult a good securities lawyer and let him or her explain this to you in black and white, as did I.

FYI, there is no good reason on this planet for Mr. Klugg to file and return Redhawk to pubic trading. Why on earth would he want to bring back the reporting liabilities and the liability of answering to shareholders?

He’s getting old. If he passes away tomorrow, this is over. When he does pass away, so does Redhawk.

We have all been had

Redhawk is not OMNI

Accountants make terrible CEOs.

I have read every post on this board at least once, some several times. I have read every one of Redhawk’s SEC filings

This company doesn’t set the world ablaze with revenue. In fact, revenues for Redhawk are abhorrent.

Their flagship product is priced too high for the market, and the market says so.

Complete nonsense. Laughable.
A collection of approximations from conversations and emails over time … I think pertaining to your question on training ; the line about toxic lenders (the et Al cases still have to wrap up)

because a company should decide to be delisted, it does not mean the company is no longer a public entity.

Just because a company should decide to be delisted, it does not mean the company is bankrupt or its common shares are worthless.

It does mean the company has $200,000 - $300,000 per year to spend on product development and not SEC compliance.

It does mean the company can apply for re-listing with the filing of a new registration statement once its Audits are complete.

It does mean any "shorts" and "naked shorts" have a difficult time covering their short positions.

It does mean any settlements for successful litigation against toxic lender will be in cash and not in stock.

It does mean any potential options or calls on the company stock will be settled with cash and not with stock dilution.