UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange
Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant
o
Filed by a Party other
than the Registrant
o
Check the
appropriate box:
o
|
|
Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
o
|
|
Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a- 6(e)(2)
)
|
þ
|
|
Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
o
|
|
Definitive
Additional Materials
|
o
|
|
Soliciting
Material Pursuant to
§240.14a-12
|
Merge
Healthcare Incorporated
(Name of
Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of
Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ
|
|
No
fee required.
|
o
|
|
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee
is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total
fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount
Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing
Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date
Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MERGE
HEALTHCARE INCORPORATED
6737
West Washington Street, Suite 2250
Milwaukee,
Wisconsin 53214–5650
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TIME
AND DATE
|
10:00
a.m., Central Daylight Time on Friday, June 12,
2009.
|
PLACE
|
Merge
Healthcare Incorporated
Corporate
Headquarters
6737
West Washington Street, Suite 2250
Milwaukee,
Wisconsin 53214–5650
|
ITEMS
OF BUSINESS
|
•
|
To
elect six (6) members of the Board of Directors, each for a term of one
(1) year or until their successors are duly elected and
qualified.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
To
ratify the appointment of BDO Seidman, LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for the 2009 fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
To
transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual
Meeting and any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
|
RECORD
DATE
|
You
can vote if you are a shareholder of record on April 17,
2009.
|
MATERIALS
TO REVIEW
|
•
|
Notice
of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
2008
Annual Report on Form
10-K
|
April
24, 2009
|
Ann
Mayberry–French
|
|
Vice
President,
|
|
General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR
THE 2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON JUNE 12,
2009.
This
Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, and the 2008 Annual Report on Form
10–K are available on our web site at
www.merge.com/annualmeeting/
Certain Corporate and
Shareholder Information are available on our website at
www.merge.com/about/governance.aspx.com
Merge
Healthcare Incorporated
6737
West Washington Street, Suite 2250
Milwaukee,
Wisconsin 53214
–5650
PROXY
STATEMENT
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
Why
did I receive these proxy materials?
We are
providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board
of Directors (the “Board”) of Merge Healthcare Incorporated (“Merge Healthcare,”
the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”), a Delaware corporation, of proxies to be
voted at our 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and at any adjournment or
postponement thereof.
You are
invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. It takes place
on June 12, 2009, beginning at 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, at the
Company’s headquarters located at 6737 West Washington Street, Suite 2250,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53214–5650.
This
Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and form of proxy and voting
instructions were first made available to shareholders on April 24,
2009.
Who
is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
Holders
of Merge Healthcare Common Stock at the close of business on April 17, 2009, are
entitled to receive notice of and to vote their shares at the Annual
Meeting. As of that date, there were 56,772,006 shares of Common
Stock outstanding. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote
on each matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting.
What
is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and as a
beneficial owner?
If your
shares are registered directly in your name with Merge Healthcare’s transfer
agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you are the “shareholder of
record” of those shares. This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy
Statement and accompanying documents have been provided directly to you by Merge
Healthcare.
If your
shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of
record, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of those
shares. This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and the
accompanying documents have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other
holder of record. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct
your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote your shares by using the
voting instruction card or by following their instructions for voting by
telephone or on the Internet.
What
can I do if I change my mind after I vote my shares?
If you
are a shareholder of record, you can revoke your proxy before it is voted by
(i) sending written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company
bearing a date later than the date of the proxy; or (ii) properly
exercising and dating a subsequent proxy relating to the shares of Common Stock
that you want voted at the Annual Meeting; or (iii) voting by ballot at the
Annual Meeting.
If you
are a beneficial owner of shares, you may submit new voting instructions by
following the instructions of your bank, broker or other holder of
record.
All votes
that have been properly cast and not revoked will be voted at the Annual
Meeting.
If
my shares are held in street name by my broker, will my broker vote my shares
for me?
For
beneficial shareholders, your broker will vote your shares only if the proposal
is a matter on which your broker has discretion to vote or if you provide
instructions on how to vote by following the instructions provided to you by
your broker. Under applicable rules, brokers have the discretion to
vote on routine matters, such as uncontested director elections and the
ratification of the selection of accounting firms. For any matters
that come before the Annual Meeting for which your broker is not permitted to
exercise voting discretion, if you do not give your broker specific
instructions, your shares will be considered “broker non–votes,” will not be
voted on those matters and will not be considered as present and entitled to
vote with respect to those matters. However, shares represented by
such “broker non–votes” will be counted in determining whether there is a quorum
present.
What
shares are included on the proxy card?
If you
are a shareholder of record you will receive only one proxy card for all the
shares you hold in certificate and in book entry form. If you are a
beneficial owner, you will receive voting instructions, and information
regarding consolidation of your vote, from your bank, broker or other holder of
record.
What
are the voting requirements to elect the Directors and to approve each of the
proposals discussed in this Proxy Statement?
•
|
Quorum
for the Annual Meeting
|
Under our
Bylaws as adopted on October 14, 2008 (which we refer to as our “Bylaws”), the
presence of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, in person or represented by proxy, is
necessary to constitute a quorum. Both abstentions and broker
non–votes are counted in the number of shares present in person or represented
by proxy for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present.
Under our
Bylaws, directors must be elected by a plurality of votes cast. This
means that the individuals with the largest number of votes are elected as
directors up to the maximum number of directors to be chosen at the Annual
Meeting. Abstentions and broker non–votes are not counted as votes
“for” or “against” this proposal.
•
|
Ratification
of BDO Seidman, LLP
|
Under our
Bylaws, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present
in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote is required to approve
the ratification of BDO Seidman, LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm. Abstentions will have the effect of a no vote and
broker non–votes will have no effect on the outcome of this
proposal.
Could
other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?
At the
date this Proxy Statement went to press, we did not know of any matters to be
raised at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this Proxy
Statement. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, it
is the intention of the proxies named in the proxy to vote the shares
represented thereby with respect to such matters in accordance with their best
judgment.
Can
I access the Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and the 2008 Annual
Report on Form 10–K on the Internet?
This
Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and the 2008 Annual Report on Form
10–K are available on our website at
http://www.merge.com/annualmeeting/
. Instead
of receiving future copies of our proxy statement and accompanying materials by
mail, most shareholders can elect to receive an e-mail that will provide
electronic links to them. Opting to receive your proxy materials
online will save us the cost of producing and mailing documents to your home or
business.
Who
will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?
To
facilitate the collection of proxies, we may appoint a proxy solicitor at the
standard industry rates. We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies,
including the charges of brokers, banks and other holders of record for
forwarding documents to you.
Who
will count the votes?
Our
transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, will tabulate the
votes.
Whom
should I call with other questions?
If you
have additional questions about this Proxy Statement or the meeting or would
like additional copies of this document or our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10–K,
please contact: Merge Healthcare Incorporated, 6737 West Washington
Street, Suite 2250, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53214–5650,
Attention: General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Telephone (414)
977–4000.
How
can I communicate with the Company’s Board of Directors?
Shareholders
who wish to communicate with our Board may send correspondence to our General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Merge Healthcare Incorporated, 6737 West
Washington Street, Suite 2250, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
53214–5650. Our General Counsel and Corporate Secretary will submit
your correspondence to our Board or the appropriate Board committee, as
applicable.
The Board
has instructed the General Counsel and Corporate Secretary to review all
communications so received, and to exercise her discretion not to forward to the
Board correspondence that is inappropriate such as business solicitations,
frivolous communications and advertising, routine business matters (i.e.
business inquiries, complaints, or suggestions) and personal
grievances. However, any Director may at any time request the General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary to forward any and all communications received
by the General Counsel and Corporate Secretary but not forwarded to the
Directors.
How
do I submit a shareholder proposal for the 2010 annual meeting?
If a
shareholder wishes to have a proposal considered for inclusion in next year’s
proxy statement, he or she must submit the proposal in writing so that we
receive it by December 28, 2009. Proposals should be addressed to our
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Merge Healthcare Incorporated, 6737
West Washington Street, Suite 2250, Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
53214–5650. In addition, our Bylaws provide that any shareholder
wishing to nominate directors or propose any other business at the annual
meeting must give us written notice by no earlier than March 12, 2010 and no
later than April 12, 2010. This notice must be sent to Merge
Healthcare Incorporated, 6737 West Washington Street, Suite 2250, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin 53214–5650; Attention: General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary. That notice must provide certain other
information as described in our Bylaws. Copies of our Bylaws are
available online at
www.merge.com/about/governance.aspx
or see “Availability of Documents” below.
What
is “householding”?
We have
adopted “householding,” a procedure under which shareholders of record who have
the same address and last name and do not receive proxy materials electronically
will receive only one copy of our annual report and proxy statement unless one
or more of these shareholders notifies us that they wish to continue receiving
individual copies. This procedure saves printing and postage costs by
reducing duplicative mailings. Shareholders who participate in
householding will continue to receive separate proxy
cards. Beneficial shareholders can request information about
householding from their banks, brokers, or other holders of
record. If you participate in householding and wish to receive a
separate copy of the 2008 Annual Report on Form 10–K and 2009 Notice of Meeting
and Proxy Statement, or if you wish to receive separate copies of future annual
reports and proxy statements, please call us at (414) 977–4000 or write
to: Merge Healthcare Incorporated, 6737 West Washington Street, Suite
2250, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53214–5650, Attention: General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary. We will deliver the requested documents to you promptly
upon your request.
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSAL ONE – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Board
Size.
It is the policy of the Company that the number of
Directors not exceed a number that can function efficiently as a
body. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers candidates to
fill new positions created by expansion and vacancies that occur by resignation,
by retirement or for any other reason. Our Bylaws provide that the
number of Directors shall consist of no less than three (3) and no more than
eleven (11) Directors. The specific number of Directors shall be
fixed from time to time by our Board. Currently, the size of the
Board shall is six (6) Directors.
Prior to
the Merrick transaction in June of 2008, described more fully below under
“Transactions with Related Persons,” our Board consisted of eleven (11)
Directors: Robert A. Barish (Chairperson of Nominating and Governance
Committee), Dennis Brown (Chairperson of Audit Committee), Michael D. Dunham
(Chairman of the Board), Anna Marie Hajek (Chairperson of Compensation
Committee), Robert T. Geras, Kevin E. Moley, Kevin G. Quinn, Ramamritham
Ramkumar, Richard A. Reck, R. Ian Lennox and Kenneth D. Rardin.
On June
4, 2008, the closing date of the Merrick transaction, five (5) of the eleven
(11) members of our Board, Michael D. Dunham, Robert A. Barish, Ramamritham
Ramkumar, R. Ian Lennox and Kenneth D. Rardin, resigned from our
Board. Our Board filled the vacancies created by such resignations by
appointing the following individuals designated by Merrick to serve on our
Board: Justin C. Dearborn, Michael W. Ferro, Jr., Gregg G.
Hartemayer, Nancy J. Koenig and Neele E. Stearns,
Jr. Mr. Stearns was also appointed to serve as chairperson of
the Audit Committee, and Mr. Hartemayer was appointed to serve on the
Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee.
On August
19, 2008, the date of the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a new Board was
elected. On that date, the following individuals
resigned: Ms. Hajek, Ms. Koenig, Mr. Moley and
Mr. Quinn; and the Board voted to utilize seven (7) Directors pursuant to
the provisions of its Bylaws.
On March
2, 2009, Mr. Geras resigned as a Director to pursue a consulting
opportunity with our Company. Subsequently, the Board determined that
it would operate with six (6) Directors consistent with the provisions of our
Bylaws.
All six
(6) current members of our Board are standing for reelection to hold office
until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders or as provided in our
Bylaws. The individuals named as proxy voters in the accompanying
proxy, or their substitutes, will vote for the following nominees with respect
to all proxies we receive unless instructions to the contrary are
provided. If any nominee becomes unavailable for any reason, the
votes will be cast for a substitute nominee designated by our
Board. Our Directors have no reason to believe that any of the
nominees named below will be unable to serve if
elected.
A
plurality of votes cast is required for the election of Directors.
A
plurality of the votes cast means that the individuals with the largest number
of votes are elected as Directors up to the maximum number of Directors to be
chosen at the Annual Meeting.
DIRECTOR
BIOGRAPHIES
The
following table lists the names of the six (6) current Directors who are
candidates for reelection, their respective ages and positions with us, followed
by a brief biography of each individual, including their business experience
during the past five (5) years.
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
|
|
|
Dennis
Brown
|
61
|
Director
|
Justin
C. Dearborn
|
39
|
Director
and Chief Executive Officer
|
Michael
W. Ferro, Jr.
|
43
|
Chairman
of Board
|
Gregg
G. Hartemayer
|
56
|
Director
|
Richard
A. Reck
|
59
|
Director
|
Neele
E. Stearns, Jr.
|
73
|
Director
|
Dennis
Brown
served as vice president of finance, chief financial officer and
treasurer of Apogent Technologies Inc. (which we refer to as “Apogent”), a New
York Stock Exchange company from January 2003 to
December 2004. Fisher Scientific International Inc. acquired
Apogent in August 2004, and after completion of a transition period,
Mr. Brown retired from Apogent in December 2004. From
December 2000 through January 2003, Mr. Brown served as a
financial consultant to Apogent. Mr. Brown also served as vice
president of finance, chief financial officer and treasurer of Apogent’s
predecessor, Sybron International Corporation (which we refer to as “Sybron”), a
publicly traded company formerly headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, from
January 1993 through December 2000, at which time Sybron’s life sciences
group was relocated to Portsmouth, New Hampshire, and Sybron was renamed
Apogent. Mr. Brown is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of
Management Accountants (England). Mr. Brown has served on our
Board since May 2003 and previously served on our Board from the date of
our initial public offering in February 1998 until
May 2000.
Justin
C. Dearborn
served as managing director and general counsel of Merrick
Ventures, LLC (with its operating entities and affiliates, are referred to
collectively to as “Merrick Ventures”) from January 2007 until his
appointment as Chief Executive Officer of the Company on June 4,
2008. Mr. Dearborn has diverse experience in operational,
financial and legal roles. Prior to joining Merrick,
Mr. Dearborn worked over nine years for Click Commerce, Inc. (which we
refer to as “Click Commerce”), a publicly traded software and services company
that was acquired by Illinois Tool Works Inc. in
October 2006. From May 2003 until May, 2005,
Mr. Dearborn served as vice president of Corporate Legal Affairs and Human
Resources at Click Commerce. Mr. Dearborn was appointed
corporate secretary of Click Commerce on May 2, 2003. Prior to
Click Commerce, Mr. Dearborn worked at Motorola, Inc. where he specialized
in intellectual property transactions and also held management positions in
Motorola’s Semiconductor and Corporate Groups. Mr. Dearborn and
holds a B.A. from Illinois State University and a J.D. from DePaul
University. He has practiced law in the state of Illinois but no
longer holds a license to practice law.
Mr. Dearborn
has served on our Board since his appointment as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company on June 4, 2008.
Michael
W. Ferro, Jr.
has served as a Director and Chairman of our Board since
June 4, 2008. Since May 2007, Mr. Ferro has served as
chairman and chief executive officer of Merrick, a private investment
firm. From June 1996 until October 2006, Mr. Ferro
served as chief executive officer and chairman of the board of Click
Commerce. Mr. Ferro is currently a member of the board of
trustees of the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry, the Field Museum, the
Joffrey Ballet, Northwestern University and the Lyric Opera of
Chicago. He also serves on the boards of directors of the Chicago
Community Trust, Children’s Memorial Hospital, Northwestern Memorial Foundation,
Big Shoulders Foundation, and AfterSchool Matters. Mr. Ferro
holds a B.A. from the University of Illinois.
Gregg
G. Hartemayer
has served as a Director of our Board since June 4,
2008 and is a member of our Nominating and Governance Committee and our
Compensation Committee. Since May 2007, Mr. Hartemayer has
served as a special advisor to Merrick. Prior to his association with
Merrick, he served in various capacities at Arthur Anderson LLP, and its then
affiliate, Accenture for 28 years. Mr. Hartemayer retired
from Accenture in February 2004 where he was chief executive for Global
Technology, Outsourcing and Global Delivery. Mr. Hartemayer
holds an M.B.A. and a B.A. in Mathematics from the University of
Michigan.
Richard
A. Reck
is the president of Business Strategy Advisors LLC, a business
strategy consulting firm, and has served in such capacity since
August 2002. Mr. Reck joined the certified public
accounting firm of KPMG LLP in June 1973 and remained employed there until
his retirement as a partner in July 2002. He currently serves on
the boards of Interactive Intelligence, Inc., a publicly held software company,
and Advanced Life Sciences Holdings Inc., a publicly held biopharmaceutical
company, as well as the boards of several private and not–for–profit
entities. Mr. Reck is a certified public accountant and holds a
B.A. in Mathematics from DePauw University and an M.B.A. in Accounting from the
University of Michigan. Mr. Reck has served as a Director
of our Board since April 2003.
Neele
E. Stearns, Jr.
has served as a Director of our Board since June 4,
2008 and is Chair of our Audit Committee. Since February 2001,
Mr. Stearns has served as chairman of Financial Investments Corporation, a
private equity investment firm. From July 2004 to
April 2007, he also served as the chief executive officer of Boulevard
Healthcare, LLC, an owner and operator of nursing homes. From
September 15, 2003 to January 15, 2004, Mr. Stearns took a leave
of absence from Financial Investments Corporation to serve as interim chairman
and chief executive officer of Footstar, Inc. Previously,
Mr. Stearns was chairman of the Board of Wallace Computer Services, Inc.,
then a provider of printed products and print management services, from
January 2000 through November 2000. Prior to 1995, he was
president and chief executive officer of CC Industries, Inc., a diversified
holding company. Mr. Stearns holds an M.B.A. from Harvard
Business School and a B.A. in Economics from Carleton
College.
RECOMMENDATION
OF THE BOARD
The
Board nominates and recommends that shareholders vote "FOR" each of for Messrs.
Brown, Dearborn, Ferro, Hartemayer, Reck and Stearns for election as Directors
of our Company to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders or as
otherwise provided in our Bylaws.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Role
and Composition of the Board of Directors
General.
The
Board, which is elected by the shareholders, is the ultimate decision–making
body of the Company, except with respect to those matters reserved to the
shareholders. It selects the Chief Executive Officer and other
members of the senior management team, which senior management team is charged
with the conduct of the Company’s business. Having selected the
senior management team, the Board acts as an advisor and counselor to senior
management and ultimately monitors its performance. The function of
the Board to monitor the performance of senior management is facilitated by the
presence of outside Directors of stature who have substantive knowledge of the
Company’s business.
Our
business, property and affairs are managed under the direction of our
Board. Members of our Board are kept informed of our business through
discussions with our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and other officers, by
reviewing materials provided to them, by visiting our offices and by
participating in meetings of the Board and its Committees.
All
Board members standing for reelection are expected to attend our Annual Meeting
of Shareholders, unless an emergency prevents them from doing so. At
our 2008 Annual Meeting, all Directors standing for reelection
attended.
In
2008, the Board of Directors met eighteen (18) times, as set forth in the table
below, and had three (3) Committees: the Audit Committee, the
Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation
Committee. All of the Directors attended at least seventy five
percent (75%) of the meetings of the Board, and at least seventy five percent
(75%) of the meetings of all committees on which they served in
2008.
It
is the general policy of the Company that all major decisions be considered by
the Board as a whole. As a consequence, the Committee structure of
the Board is limited to those Committees considered to be basic to, or required
for, the operation of a publicly owned company. Currently, these
Committees are the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and the Nominating
and Governance Committee. The membership of these Committees is
rotated from time to time.
Selection
Criteria.
Candidates are selected by the Nominating and
Governance Committee for, among other things, their integrity, independence,
diversity of experience, leadership and their ability to exercise sound
judgment. Final approval of a candidate is determined by the full
Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee considers candidates
suggested by our shareholders for election as a Director, provided that the
recommendations are made according to the procedures required under our
Bylaws. Shareholder nominees whose nominations comply with these
procedures will be evaluated by the Nominating and Governance Committee in the
same manner as the Nominating and Governance Committee’s
nominees.
Director
Compensation.
The Nominating and Governance Committee
makes recommendations to the Board regarding the compensation of
Directors.
Executive
Sessions.
Executive
sessions or meetings of outside Directors without management present are held
regularly at the Board’s discretion and consistent with NASDAQ Global Market
Rules.
Availability
of Documents
The
various documents relating to our corporate governance are published on our
website at
www.merge.com/about/governance.aspx
.
•
|
Audit
Committee Charter
|
•
|
Compensation
Committee Charter
|
•
|
Nominating
and Governance Committee Charter
|
•
|
Certificate
of Incorporation
|
We will
provide any of the foregoing information without charge upon written request
submitted to General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Merge Healthcare, 6737
West Washington Street, Suite 2250, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin 53214–5650. Our website is not incorporated into
or a part of this Proxy Statement.
Director
Independence
Our Board
follows the NASDAQ Global Market Rules regarding the independence of
directors. The Board recognizes that independent directors play an
important role in assuring investor confidence. As such, the Board
has determined that each of Messrs. Brown, Geras, Hartemayer, Reck, and Stearns
is independent under the listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Market.
For
the Directors on our Board prior to the Merrick transaction, the Board had
determined that each of Messrs. Moley, Quinn and Ms. Hajek were independent
prior to their resignations from the Board on the date of the election of
Directors at the 2008 Annual Meeting.
Merge
Healthcare's Code of Ethics
All of
our employees, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
our Controllers, and persons performing similar functions, including all
Directors and employees, are required to abide by Merge Healthcare’s Code of
Ethics to ensure that our business is conducted in a consistently legal and
ethical manner. This Code of Ethics along with our Whistleblower
Policy form the foundation of a comprehensive process that includes compliance
with all corporate policies and procedures, an open relationship among
colleagues that contributes to good business conduct, and the high integrity
level of our employees. Our policies and procedures cover all areas
of professional conduct, including employment policies, conflicts of interest,
intellectual property and the protection of confidential information, as well as
strict adherence to all laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our
business.
Employees are required to
report any conduct that they believe in good faith to be an actual or apparent
violation of Merge Healthcare’s Code of Ethics. The Sarbanes–Oxley
Act of 2002 requires audit committees to have procedures to receive, retain and
treat complaints received regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or
auditing matters and to allow for the confidential and anonymous submission by
employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing
matters. We have such procedures in place as set forth in the Merge
Healthcare Incorporated Whistleblower Policy
and the Code of
Ethics.
Both our
Code of Ethics and our Whistleblower Policy are available to our shareholders on
our web site at
www.merge.com/about/governance.aspx
and in print. To request copies of these documents, make such request
in writing to the General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Merge Healthcare
Incorporated, 6737 West Washington Street, Suite 2250, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin 53214–5650. Future material amendments relating
to the Code of Ethics and/or the Whistleblower Policy will be disclosed on our
web site. See “Availability of Documents“ above for further
details.
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
The table
below provides 2008 membership and meeting information for each of the Board
Committees.
Name
|
|
Audit
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Nominating
and Governance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
A. Barish, M. D. (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
(2)
|
Dennis
Brown
|
|
|
X
|
(3)
|
|
|
X
|
(*)
|
|
|
X
|
|
Justin
C. Dearborn (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
D. Dunham (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
W. Ferro, Jr. (4)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
T. Geras (6)
|
|
|
X
|
(7)
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
(*)(6)
|
Anna
Marie Hajek (8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
(9)
|
|
|
X
|
|
Gregg
G. Hartemayer (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
(10)
|
|
|
X
|
(11)
|
Nancy
J. Koenig (4)(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R.
Ian Lennox (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Kevin
E. Moley (8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin
G. Quinn (8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ramamritham
Ramkumar (1)
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth
D. Rardin (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
A. Reck
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
(*)(12)
|
Neele
E. Stearns, Jr. (4)
|
|
|
X
|
(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Represents
Committee Chairperson.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Resigned
as a member of the Board of Directors effective June 4,
2008.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Dr. Barish
resigned as Chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee
effective June 4, 2008.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Mr. Brown
resigned as Chairperson of the Audit Committee effective upon the date of
election of Directors at the 2008 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders,
August 19. 2008.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Appointed
as a member of the Board effective June 4, 2008.
|
(5)
|
|
Appointed
as Chairman of the Board effective June 4, 2008.
|
(6)
|
|
Mr. Geras
resigned as a Director and as Chairperson of the Nominating and Governance
Committee effective March 2, 2009.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Mr. Geras
resigned as a member of the Audit Committee effective June 4,
2008.
|
(8)
|
|
Resigned
as a member of the Board effective upon the date of election of Directors
at the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, August 19,
2008.
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
Ms. Hajek
resigned as Chairperson of the Compensation Committee effective upon the
date of election of Directors at the 2008 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders,
August 19, 2008.
|
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
Appointed
as a member of the Compensation Committee effective August 19,
2008.
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
Appointed
as a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee effective August
19, 2008.
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
Appointed
as Chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee effective upon
Mr. Geras’ resignation on March 2, 2009.
|
|
|
|
The Audit Committee
The Audit
Committee is comprised of entirely independent Directors in accordance with the
listing standards of the NASDAQ Global Market and applicable rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”). Under its Charter,
the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing with the independent registered
public accounting firm and management the adequacy and effectiveness of internal
controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee reviews and
consults with management and the independent registered public accounting firm
on matters related to the annual audit, the published financial statements,
earnings releases and the accounting principles applied. The Audit
Committee is also responsible for appointing, retaining and evaluating the
Company’s independent public accounting firm. The Committee is
directly responsible for the compensation, retention and oversight of the
Company’s independent public accounting firm and evaluates the independent
public accounting firm’s qualifications, performance and
independence. The Committee reviews reports from management relating
to the status of compliance with laws, regulations and internal
procedures. The Audit Committee is also responsible for reviewing and
discussing with management the Company’s policies with respect to risk
assessment and risk management.
The Audit
Committee adopted an amended and restated charter on November 20, 2008, to
replace the charter which had previously been in effect. A copy of
the Audit Committee Charter is attached as
Appendix A
to this Proxy Statement and is also available on our website at
www.merge.com/about/governance.aspx
and in print upon request. See “Availability of Documents”
above. The Audit Committee met twelve (12) times in
2008.
The Board
has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is an “audit
committee financial expert” for purposes of the Commission’s rules.
The
Compensation Committee
The Compensation
Committee
is
comprised entirely of independent Directors in accordance with the listing
standards of the NASDAQ Global Market and each Committee member is a
“non–employee director” as defined in Rule 16b–3 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) and is an “outside director” as defined
in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Committee
determines the Company’s compensation philosophy and oversees and administers
the Company’s executive compensation programs. Its responsibilities
also include overseeing Merge Healthcare’s compensation and benefit plans and
policies, administering its stock plans (including reviewing and approving
equity grants) and reviewing and approving annually all compensation programs
for the Company’s executive officers.
The
Compensation Committee Charter is available on our website at
www.merge.com/about/governance.aspx
and in print upon request. See “Availability of Documents”
above. The Compensation Committee met nine (9) times in 2008, two (2)
of which meetings were jointly held with the Nominating and Governance
Committee.
The
Nominating and Governance Committee
The
Nominating and Governance Committee is comprised entirely of independent
Directors. Under the terms of its Charter, the Nominating and
Governance Committee is responsible for matters of corporate governance and
matters relating to the practices, policies and procedures of the
Board. This includes identifying, recruiting and recommending
director candidates as well as considering nominees recommended by
shareholders. The Committee is responsible for recommending corporate
governance guidelines and otherwise taking a leadership role in shaping the
corporate governance of the Company.
The
Committee advises on the structure of Board meetings and recommends matters for
consideration by the Board. The Committee also advises on and
recommends director compensation, which is ultimately approved by the full
Board.
The Nominating and
Governance Committee Charter is available on our website at
www.merge.com/about/governance.aspx
and in print upon
request. See “Availability of Documents” above. The
Nominating and Governance Committee met five (5) times in 2008, two (2) of which
meetings were jointly held with the Compensation
Committee.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During fiscal 2008 and as
of the date of this Proxy Statement, none of the members of the Compensation
Committee was or is an officer or employee of the Company, and no executive
officer of the Company served or serves on the Compensation Committee or Board
of any company that employed or employs any member of the Company’s Compensation
Committee or Board.
COMPENSATION
OF NON–EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
Following
the Merrick transaction discussed below, our non–employee Directors no longer
receive cash compensation. Instead, the Directors received stock
options, which options vest over sixteen equal
quarterly
increments and have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the
Company’s shares on the date of grant. For 2008, our
current Chairman of the Board was awarded an option grant to purchase
400,000 shares of our Common Stock, our current Chairman of the Audit
Committee was awarded an option grant to purchase 300,000 shares of our Common
Stock, and each of our other current non–employee Directors were awarded an
option grant to purchase 225,000 shares of our Common Stock.
Director
Compensation For Fiscal Year 2008
The
following tables provide information about the compensation earned by our
Directors during 2008, regardless of when paid, and their equity holdings as of
December 31, 2008. The tables do not include Mr. Dearborn,
an employee Director, who received no additional compensation for his services
as a Director.
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid
in Cash (1)
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
(2)
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Dennis
Brown
|
|
|
22,750
|
|
|
|
40,214
|
|
|
|
62,964
|
|
Michael
W. Ferro, Jr.
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
Robert
T. Geras
|
|
|
18,250
|
|
|
|
40,214
|
|
|
|
58,464
|
|
Gregg
G. Hartemayer
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
28,904
|
|
|
|
28,904
|
|
Richard
A. Reck
|
|
|
20,500
|
|
|
|
40,214
|
|
|
|
60,714
|
|
Neele
E. Stearns, Jr.
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
38,538
|
|
|
|
38,538
|
|
(1)
|
Certain
Directors were paid for their meeting attendance, as well as their
participation on the Board and as Committee Chairpersons for the quarterly
period ending March 31, 2008 in accordance with the Board compensation
plan in effect on the date of our 2007 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. Directors no longer receive cash compensation for
their meeting attendance or their participation as a member of the Board
in accordance with the Board compensation plan in effect on the date of
our 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Although eligible to
receive compensation for their meeting attendance and their Board
participation following the March 31, 2008 date through the date of our
2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, those eligible Directors voluntarily
waived such compensation.
|
(2)
|
Amounts
reflect that portion of the dollar amount of options that we recognized
for financial statement reporting purposes in accordance with
FAS 123R for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are
included in Note 8 to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 included in our Annual Report on Form 10–K filed
with the Commission on March 11, 2009. Please refer to the
following table entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards of Directors at Fiscal
Year End” for the aggregate number of option awards outstanding as of
December 31, 2008. Our Directors have not been awarded any
restricted stock.
|
REVIEW
OF RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
The
Company adopted written policies and procedures regarding related person
transactions. For purposes of these policies and
procedures:
|
·
|
A
“related person” means any of our Directors, executive officers, nominees
for director, holder of five percent (5%) or more of our Common Stock or
any of their immediate family members;
and
|
|
·
|
A
“related person transaction” generally is a transaction (including any
indebtedness or a guarantee of indebtedness) in which we were or are to be
a participant and the amount involved exceeds $50,000, and in which a
related person had or will have a direct or indirect material
interest.
|
Each of
our executive officers, Directors or nominees for director is required to
disclose certain information relating to related persons transactions for
review, approval or ratification by our Audit Committee. Disclosure
to our Audit Committee should occur before, if possible, or as soon as
practicable after the related person transaction is effected, but in any event
as soon as practicable after the executive
officer,
Director or nominee for director becomes aware of the related person
transaction. Our Audit Committee’s decision whether or not to approve
or ratify a related person transaction is to be made in light of its
determination that consummation of the transaction is not or was not contrary to
the best interests of the Company. Any related person transaction
must be disclosed to our full Board.
TRANSACTIONS
WITH RELATED PERSONS
On
June 4, 2008, we consummated the transactions contemplated by a Securities
Purchase Agreement (which we refer to as the “Purchase Agreement”), dated
May 21, 2008, that we had entered into with certain of our subsidiaries and
Merrick RIS, LLC, an affiliate of Merrick. In connection with the
transactions, we issued (i) a $15 million senior secured Term Note
(which we refer to as the “Term Note”), and (ii) 21,085,715 shares of our
Common Stock at a price per share of $0.35 to Merrick. We refer to
the shares issued in the transaction as the “Shares.” Merrick obtained the funds
to purchase the Term Note and the Shares through equity contributions made by
its members.
The Term
Note bears interest at 13.0% per annum, payable quarterly, and becomes payable
in a single installment on the second anniversary date of the closing of the
transaction. The Term Note is secured by a first priority lien on all
of the assets of our and our subsidiaries’ U.S. and Canadian
operations.
We also
entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (which we refer to as the
“Registration Rights Agreement”) with Merrick. The Registration
Rights Agreement requires us, upon Merrick’s request, to file and maintain the
effectiveness of a registration statement covering the Shares. If we
do not fulfill certain of our obligations under the Registration Rights
Agreement with respect to registering the Shares, we will be required to pay
additional interest on the outstanding principal of the Term Note as liquidated
damages for our breach under the Registration Rights Agreement.
Pursuant
to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, Merrick had the right to designate five
(5) persons to be nominated to our Board in the future, subject to
reduction upon a decrease in Merrick’s ownership percentage in our
Company. On July 1, 2008, the Company and Merrick amended the
Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which Merrick gave up its contractual right to
nominate persons to our Board. As a result, Merrick is no longer
obligated to vote for the slate of Directors nominated by the
Company.
Michael
W. Ferro, Jr. and trusts for the benefit of Mr. Ferro’s family members
beneficially own a majority of the equity interest in
Merrick. Mr. Ferro also serves as the chairman and chief
executive officer of Merrick. Accordingly, Mr. Ferro indirectly
owns or controls the Term Note and all of the Shares owned by
Merrick.
Because
the related person transaction policies and procedures do not apply to directors
or executive officers prior to their becoming directors or executive officers,
the policies and procedures did not require review, approval or ratification of
the transactions above prior to or after execution.
Mr. Hartemayer
owns immaterial economic interests in Merrick.
Until
their appointments as officers of our Company, Mr. Dearborn served as the
general counsel and a managing director of Merrick, and Ms. Koenig served
as the chief executive officer of Merrick Healthcare, LLC, a portfolio company
of Merrick Ventures. Mr. Dearborn and Ms. Koenig resigned
from all of their positions with Merrick and its affiliates (other than our
Company and our subsidiaries) upon joining our Company.
The
Company entered into a Consulting Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009 with
Merrick RIS, LLC, which allows the Company to take advantage of certain
consulting services offered by Merrick. These services include, but
are not limited to, investor relations, financial analysis and strategic
planning. This transaction was approved by the Audit Committee in
accordance with its written policies and procedures regarding related person
transactions. The cost of this Consulting Agreement for the first
quarter of 2009 was $130,229 and is estimated to be $520,000 for
2009.
Effective
March 31, 2009, the Company entered into a software license agreement with
Merrick Healthcare Solutions, an entity doing business as Olivia
Greets. Olivia Greets is wholly owned by Merrick. This
transaction was approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with its written
policies and procedures regarding related person transactions. The
revenue generated by this agreement is estimated to be $400,000, exclusive of
optional services, which may be purchased by Olivia Greets, over its
term.
MANAGEMENT
Executive
Officers
The names
of our current executive officers, and their respective ages and positions are
as follows:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
Justin
C. Dearborn
|
|
|
39
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer, Director
|
Nancy
J. Koenig
|
|
|
44
|
|
President
Merge Fusion
|
Ann
Mayberry–French
|
|
|
48
|
|
General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
Steven
M. Oreskovich
|
|
|
37
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
Antonia
A. Wells
|
|
|
50
|
|
President
Merge OEM
|
Mr. Dearborn’s
biography appears above under the heading “Shareholder Proposal One – Election
of Directors.”
Nancy
J. Koenig
was appointed President of Merge Fusion in June of
2008. Ms. Koenig comes to the Company from Merrick Healthcare
Solutions (a Merrick portfolio company), where she served as its chief executive
officer. Prior to joining Merrick in the fall of 2007,
Ms. Koenig was the president of Click Commerce during its integration as a
subsidiary of ITW. Nancy joined Click Commerce in 1999 as the
director of business consulting and held various positions, including serving as
the head of Click’s European Operations, its vice president of Product
Operations and Marketing and its executive vice president –
Operations. Ms. Koenig became Click’s president in
2006.
Ann
Mayberry–French
was appointed General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in
August of 2008. Ms. Mayberry–French comes to the Company from
Modine Manufacturing Company where she served as senior
counsel. Prior to joining Modine Manufacturing Company,
Ms. Mayberry–French was the general counsel and secretary of Assurant
Health for seven years. Ms. Mayberry–French has over 27 years of
experience in the healthcare and health insurance industry, including business
management of managed care services and federal government
contracting. Ms. Mayberry–French is a Registered Nurse and has
been licensed to practice law in Kentucky, Ohio and Wisconsin. She
currently maintains a license to practice only in Wisconsin, but is also
admitted in Ohio and Kentucky.
Steven
M. Oreskovich
was
appointed Chief Financial Officer in June 2008. Prior to his
appointment as Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Oreskovich served as our Vice
President of Internal Audit since January 2007, as our Chief Accounting
Officer and interim Treasurer and interim Secretary from July 2006 to
January 2007 and as our Vice President and Corporate Controller from
April 2004 to July 2006. Prior to joining our Company,
Mr. Oreskovich served as vice president of finance and operations at Truis,
Inc., a company that provided customer intelligence solutions for
business–to–business enterprises, from April 2000 to January
2003. Prior to that, Mr. Oreskovich worked as an auditor at
PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP from September 1994 to
April 2000. Mr. Oreskovich holds a B.S. degree in
Accounting from Marquette University and is a
C.P.A.
Antonia
A. Wells
was appointed President of Merge OEM in
June 2008. Prior to her appointment as President Merge OEM,
Ms. Wells served as Merge OEM Vice President of Customer Operations since
June 2005. Since joining our Company in 1999, Ms. Wells has been
responsible for Merge OEM’s contract management, quality/regulatory affairs,
manufacturing, order management, professional services
and
internal infrastructure. Ms. Wells has over 25 years of
business management experience, including leadership roles in IT, enterprise
system implementation, process re–engineering, and human
resources.
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
This
Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation
program for 2008 and certain elements of the 2009 program. We use
this program to attract, motivate, and retain colleagues whom the Board has
selected to lead our business.
This
section of the Proxy Statement explains how the Compensation Committee made its
compensation decisions for our officers who also comprise our named executive
officers. Those Named Executive Officers are our Chief Executive
Officer, Justin C. Dearborn; our President, Merge Fusion, Nancy J. Koenig; our
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Ann Mayberry–French;
our Chief Financial Officer, Steven M. Oreskovich; and our President, Merge OEM,
Antonia A. Wells.
MARKET AND BUSINESS CONDITIONS
We and
our industry continue to face challenges due to the profoundly changed global
business environment in which we operate. Merge Healthcare improved
its financial position during the second half of 2008 and continues to take
steps to manage overhead while growing revenue in order to improve our financial
strength and sustain future performance. In furtherance of our
company–wide transformational efforts, which commenced in mid–2008, we have
continued to operate two operational units: Merge OEM (selling
customized software solutions to original equipment manufacturers in the
healthcare information technology industry) and Merge Fusion (selling software
solutions to end–users such as radiologists, diagnostic imaging centers and
hospitals). These business units are focused on providing software
solutions for digital imaging in the health care market space. Our
business structure is designed to provide each global business unit with the
authority and accountability to make decisions as part of the overall Merge
Healthcare global business – quickly and with agility – in the best interest of
its stakeholders, including our customers. We believe this business
model will contribute to improved performance and increased shareholder
value.
PHILOSOPHY AND GOALS OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
PROGRAM
Compensation
Philosophy
The
primary objectives of our executive compensation policies are as
follows:
|
·
|
to
attract and retain talented executives by providing compensation that is
in alignment with the compensation provided to executives at companies of
comparable size and growth trajectory in the health care information
technology industry, while maintaining compensation within levels that are
consistent with our annual budget, financial objectives and operating
performance; and
|
|
·
|
to
provide appropriate incentives for executives to work toward the
achievement of our annual financial performance and business goals, based
primarily on diluted earnings per
share.
|
Our
incentive compensation programs are designed to reward executive and other
employee contributions based on the success of our
organization. Specifically, they are designed to reward achievement
of our annual financial performance and business goals and creation of
shareholder value.
Compensation
Mix
Historically,
we have used a mix of short–term compensation (base salaries and annual cash
incentive bonuses) and long–term compensation (stock option grants and
restricted stock awards) to meet the objectives of our compensation
programs. We do not have a fixed policy for allocating between
long–term and short–term compensation or between cash and non–cash
compensation. Because we believe that it is important to align the
interests of our executives with those of our shareholders, equity incentive
compensation has made up a portion of each current executive’s overall
compensation package. In the near term, we plan to continue to use
primarily short–term compensation (base salaries and annual cash incentive
bonuses) as well as long–term compensation, as appropriate.
The
compensation that we pay our Named Executive Officers consists of base salary,
cash incentive compensation and stock option awards. The following
discussion explains the reason we pay each element of compensation, how the
amount of each element is determined, and how each element fits into our overall
compensation philosophy and affects decisions regarding other
elements.
We seek
to pay executives a base salary in alignment with salaries of executives at
companies of comparable position in the healthcare information technology
industry and at a rate that fits within our annual budget, financial objectives
and operating performance. We have not historically attempted to make
base salary a certain percentage of total compensation.
Although
the Company reported total net income of approximately $2.3 million in the third
and fourth quarters of 2008, the 2008 full year operations resulted in a net
loss of approximately $23.7 million. In light of the Company’s 2008
annual performance and the public sentiment regarding corporate bonus payouts
for substandard, annual corporate performance, the Compensation Committee
determined that the Company performance did not warrant cash incentive payments
for 2008. Additionally, for 2009, no company wide merit awards or
salary increases to Named Executive Officers were given for the same
reasons.
Role
of the Compensation Committee
The
Compensation Committee of our Board is responsible for administering our
compensation practices and ensuring they are designed to drive corporate
performance. Our Compensation Committee reviews compensation policies
affecting our executive officers annually, taking into consideration our
financial performance, our position within the health care information
technology industry, the executive compensation policies of similar companies in
similar industries and, when reviewing individual compensation levels, certain
individual factors, including the executive’s level of experience and
responsibility and the personal contribution that the individual has made to our
success. Further, our Compensation Committee also considers the
global economic trends and the macroeconomic environment.
Annually, our Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of
all executive officers and based on these reviews, may adjust these salaries to
ensure external competitiveness and to reflect the executive’s individual
position and performance, as well as the performance of our
Company. In addition to these factors, our Compensation Committee
considers the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer when adjusting base
salaries of our Named Executive Officers other than himself. We may
also make base salary adjustments during the year if the scope of an executive
officer’s responsibility changes relative to the other
executives.
Modifications
To Our Executive Compensation Program
The
Committee continues to focus its efforts to refine the executive compensation
structure and process consistent with evolving good governance
practices.
Beginning
in June 2008, in connection with the investment by Merrick in our Company,
several changes occurred in the makeup of our senior management
team. Specifically, effective on the closing of the Merrick
investment, Mr. Dearborn became our Chief Executive Officer,
Mr. Oreskovich became our Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Koenig became
our President of Merge Fusion and Ms. Wells became our President of Merge
OEM. In connection with these changes, the Compensation Committee
proposed and the Board accepted several modifications to our executive officer
and director compensation programs to ensure that we offer competitive
compensation that will help us to retain our executive officers and to reflect
the views of the current members of our Board and the Compensation Committee on
appropriate compensation structures.
During
2008, we also implemented a different director compensation program than
previously utilized for our Directors as set forth in the Director compensation
discussion.
We have
entered into employment agreements with four (4) Named Executive
Officers: Mr. Dearborn, Ms. Koenig, Mr. Oreskovich and
Ms. Wells. The agreements formalize and confirm the base
compensation, target annual bonus amounts and the stock option grants that we
agreed to in connection with the hiring of Mr. Dearborn and
Ms. Koenig, and Mr. Oreskovich’s and Ms. Wells’
promotions. The agreements provide for twelve (12) months’ base
salary as severance upon a termination other than for cause or other than due to
the executive officer’s death or disability, conditioned on the executive
officer’s execution of a release agreement. The agreements do not
include a definition of “cause.” In addition, upon a change of control of the
Company, all of the executive officers’ stock options will vest. We
proposed the amounts of these severance benefits and the triggering events based
on the subjective judgments and experiences of the members of the Compensation
Committee indicating that these amounts are consistent with market practice and
that the triggering events are likely to involve circumstances in which it is
customary and appropriate to offer the protections embodied in the employment
agreements.
We
established the terms of the compensation arrangements with four (4) of our
Named Executive Officers at the time of the closing of the Merrick investment,
as noted above. Under the employment agreements, Mr. Dearborn
receives an annual base salary of $250,000 and has a target annual bonus equal
to his base salary. Ms. Koenig receives an annual base salary of
$200,000 and has a target annual bonus equal to her base
salary. Ms. Wells receives an annual base salary of
CAD$200,000 and has a target annual bonus equal to her annual base
salary. Mr. Oreskovich receives an annual base salary of
$200,000 and has a target annual bonus equal to 50% of his annual base
salary. The compensation arrangement for Ms. Mayberry–French was
determined upon her date of hire. Those arrangements are as
follows: Ms. Mayberry–French was hired at an annual salary of
$150,000 and received a salary increase effective on January 1, 2009, due to
additional responsibility for the Human Resources function of the
Company. Ms. Mayberry–French now receives an annual salary of
$160,000 and has a target annual bonus of thirty five percent (35%) of her base
salary. Achievement of bonus for each of the current executive
officers is tied to factors defined by the Compensation Committee for the 2009
annual bonus program and could result in a bonus amount that is more or less
than the targeted bonus.
In
addition, in connection with their appointment as executive officers of our
Company in 2008, we granted Mr. Dearborn, Ms. Koenig,
Ms. Mayberry–French, Mr. Oreskovich and Ms. Wells options to
purchase 600,000, 200,000, 200,000, 100,000 and 200,000 shares of our Common
Stock, respectively, at the closing price for a share of our Common Stock on the
date of grant. The options are non–qualified stock options, expire on
the sixth anniversary of the grant date and vest at a rate of 25% per year,
contingent on the executive officer’s continuous employment through the
applicable vesting date. The vesting of the options will accelerate
on a change in control of our Company. These options were granted
under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT
The
Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S–K set forth
above with management and, based on such review
and
discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy
Statement.
The
Compensation Committee
·
Dennis
Brown, Chairperson
·
Gregg
G. Hartemayer
·
Richard
A. Reck
COMPENSATION
OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Summary
Compensation Tables
The
following two tables summarize the compensation earned by our Named Executive
Officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
Current
Executive Officers
The
following table relates to the compensation earned by our current Named
Executive Officers in 2008.
Name
and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
(1)
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
(2)
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
(2)
($)
|
|
|
Non
Equity (3)
Incentive
Plan Compensation
($)
|
|
|
All
Other Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Justin C. Dearborn
(4)
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
2008
|
|
|
143,109
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
37,880
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
7,018
|
(5)
|
|
188,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven M. Oreskovich
(6)
Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
2008
2007
2006
|
|
|
189,583
175,000
59,375
|
|
|
––
130,000
746
|
|
|
26,343
2,734
––
|
|
|
183,051
165
,166
223,363
|
|
|
––
5,469
35,000
|
|
|
10,222
9,514
3,906
|
(5)
(5
)
(5)
|
|
389,199
487,883
422,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nancy J. Koenig
(4)
President,
Merge Fusion
|
|
2008
|
|
|
114,487
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
11,203
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
2,236
|
(5)
|
|
127,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antonia A. Wells
(7)
President,
Merge OEM
|
|
2008
|
|
|
160,474
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
26,343
|
|
|
68,390
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
5,975
|
(8)
|
|
261,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ann G.
Mayberry–French (9)
Vice
President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
|
|
2008
|
|
|
60,288
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
7,737
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
4,882
|
(3)
|
|
72,907
|
|
(1)
|
|
For
2007, reflects a retention bonus of $105,000 for Mr. Oreskovich, and
a discretionary bonus of $25,000 for Mr. Oreskovich.
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reflects
that portion of the dollar amount of awards that we recognized for
financial statement reporting purposes in accordance with FAS 123R,
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. Based on this
methodology, the option amounts may include amounts from option awards
granted in and prior to 2008. Assumptions used in the
calculation of these amounts are included in Note 8 to our audited
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 included
in our Annual Report on Form 10–K filed with the Commission on March 11,
2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents
the cash incentive award earned under our 2007 performance–based cash
bonus plan.
|
(4)
|
|
Mr. Dearborn
and Ms. Koenig each began employment with us at the consummation of
the Merrick transaction, effective June 4, 2008.
|
(5)
|
|
For
2008, represents our matching contribution under our 401(k) employee
retirement savings plan ($1,875 for Mr. Dearborn, $5,688 for
Mr. Oreskovich, and $1,125 for Ms. Mayberry–French) and medical,
dental, optical and life insurance benefits ($5,143 for Mr. Dearborn,
$4,534 for Mr. Oreskovich, $2,236 for Ms. Koenig, and $3,757 for
Ms. Mayberry–French). For 2007, represents our matching
contribution under our 401(k) employee retirement savings plan ($5,250 for
Mr. Oreskovich) and medical, dental, optical and life insurance
benefits ($4,264 for Mr. Oreskovich). For 2006, represents
our matching contribution under our 401(k) employee retirement savings
plan.
|
(6)
|
|
At
the consummation of the Merrick transaction effective June 4, 2008,
Mr. Oreskovich was promoted to the position of Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer. Prior to that time, Mr. Oreskovich
held the position of Vice President of Internal Audit.
|
(7)
|
|
At
the consummation of the Merrick transaction effective June 4, 2008,
Ms. Wells was promoted to the position of President, Merge
OEM. Prior to that time, Ms. Wells held the position of
Vice President, Customer Operations of our Cedara business
division.
|
(8)
|
|
Represents
a Company contribution of $2,207 under our Deferred Profit Sharing Plan
(“DPSP”) for Canadian employees and the payment of $3,768 in medical,
dental, optical and life insurance and related costs for the benefit of
Ms. Wells.
|
(9)
|
|
Ms. Mayberry–French
began her employment with us effective August 4,
2008.
|
Former
Executive Officers
The
following table relates to the compensation earned by our former Named Executive
Officers in 2008.
Name
and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
(1)
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
(2)
(
$)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
(2)
($)
|
|
|
Non
Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(3)
($)
|
|
|
All
Other Compensation ($)
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth
D. Rardin
Former
President & Chief Executive Officer (4)
|
|
|
2008
2007
2006
|
|
|
|
194,358
425,000
137,035
|
|
|
|
––
99,167
94,950
|
|
|
|
435,393
15,376
––
|
|
|
|
728,194
406,840
571,500
|
(5)
|
|
|
––
––
––
|
|
|
|
1,359,171
11,254
37,232
|
(6)(7)(8)
|
|
2,717,116
957,637
840,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
R. Norton
Former
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(9)
|
|
|
2008
2007
|
|
|
|
144,117
294,423
|
|
|
|
––
––
|
|
|
|
290,262
10,251
|
|
|
|
61,354
157,782
|
(10)
|
|
|
––
20,750
|
|
|
|
693,959
16,228
|
(6)(7)(8)
(6)
|
|
1,189,692
499,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary
D. Bowers
Former
President, Merge Healthcare North America
(11)
|
|
|
2008
2007
2006
|
|
|
|
109,276
235,000
71,901
|
|
|
|
––
––
32,148
|
|
|
|
290,262
10,251
––
|
|
|
|
(30,945
109,239
129,484
|
)(12)(13)
|
|
|
––
11,750
––
|
|
|
|
492,086
26,221
12,000
|
|
|
860,679
392,461
245,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacques
F. Cornet
Former
President, Merge Healthcare EMEA
(14)
|
|
|
2008
2007
2006
|
|
|
|
250,180
270,862
207,834
|
|
|
|
––
121,440
138,537
|
|
|
|
––
––
––
|
|
|
|
(28,168
73,630
59,069
|
)(13)(15)
|
|
|
31,060
25,326
––
|
|
|
|
19,205
21,145
19,817
|
(7)(16)
(16)
|
|
272,277
512,403
425,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loris
Sartor
Former
President, Cedara Software (17)
|
|
|
2008
2007
2006
|
|
|
|
258,632
270,862
139,584
|
|
|
|
––
75,900
675
|
|
|
|
290,262
10,251
––
|
|
|
|
4,874
87,878
69,419
|
(18)
|
|
|
4,299
6,569
148,285
|
|
|
|
119,016
23,235
29,952
|
(8)(19)
(19)
|
|
677,083
474,695
383,915
|
|
___________________
(1)
|
For
2007, reflects a guaranteed bonus of $99,167 for Mr. Rardin, and
retention bonuses of $121,440 and $75,900 for Mr. Cornet and
Mr. Sartor, respectively.
|
(2)
|
Reflects
that portion of the dollar amount of awards that we recognized for
financial statement reporting purposes in accordance with FAS 123R,
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. Based on this
methodology, the option amounts may include amounts from option awards
granted in and prior to 2008. Assumptions used in the
calculation of these amounts are included in Note 8 to our audited
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 included
in our Annual Report on Form 10–K filed with the Commission on March 11,
2009.
|
(3)
|
Represents
the cash incentive award earned under our 2007 performance–based cash
bonus plan.
|
(4)
|
Mr. Rardin
resigned all positions with us and our subsidiaries, including as an
officer, employee and director, effective June 4, 2008.
|
(5)
|
Upon
Mr. Rardin’s departure from our Company effective June 4, 2008, he
forfeited 225,000 unvested options, and voluntarily surrendered 225,000
unexercised, vested options.
|
(6)
|
For
2008, represents our matching contribution under our 401(k) employee
retirement savings plan ($4,324 for Mr. Norton and $2,938 for
Mr. Bowers) and medical, dental, optical and life insurance benefits
($5,431 for Mr. Rardin, $5,235 for Mr. Norton and $4,095 for
Mr. Bowers). For 2007, represents our matching
contribution under our 401(k) employee retirement savings plan ($6,750 for
Mr. Norton) and medical, dental, optical and life insurance benefits
($11,254 for Mr. Rardin, $9,478 for Mr. Norton, and $8,852 for
Mr. Bowers) and $17,369 paid to Mr. Bowers for transportation,
temporary lodging and other costs incurred related to commuting from his
home in Alpharetta, Georgia to his primary place of employment in
Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
|
(7)
|
Reflects
severance payments made under their respective severance agreements
($1,149,740 for
Mr. Rardin,
$548,400 for Mr. Norton, and $349,053 for Mr. Bowers); and
reflects a $14,210 severance
payment
made to
Mr.
Cornet under his employment agreement.
|
(8)
|
Represents
gross taxable income resulting from the disbursement of shares of
restricted stock at their respective separation dates from Company in the
amount of $204,000 for Mr. Rardin, $136,000 for Mr. Norton,
$136,000 for Mr. Bowers, and $113,867 for
Mr. Sartor.
|
(9)
|
Mr. Norton
resigned all positions with us and our subsidiaries, including as an
officer, employee and director, effective June 4, 2008.
|
(10)
|
Upon
Mr. Norton’s departure from our Company effective June 4, 2008, he
forfeited 150,007 unvested options, and voluntarily surrendered 74,993
unexercised, vested options.
|
(11)
|
Mr. Bowers
resigned all positions with us and our subsidiaries, including as an
officer and employee,
effective
June 4, 2008.
|
(12)
|
Upon
Mr. Bowers’ departure from our Company effective June 4, 2008, he
forfeited 68,750 unvested options, and voluntarily surrendered 56,250
unexercised, vested options.
|
(13)
|
Negative
amounts result from the reduction of expenses recognized in prior years
related to option awards forfeited prior to the annual vesting
period.
|
(14)
|
Mr. Cornet
resigned all positions with us and our subsidiaries, including as an
officer and employee, effective March 31, 2008.
|
(15)
|
Upon
Mr. Cornet’s departure from our Company effective March 31, 2008, he
forfeited 83,750 options.
|
(16)
|
For
2008, represents a Company contribution of $1,775 under our DPSP for
Canadian employees,
payment
of $3,220 in medical, dental, optical and life insurance and related costs
for the benefit of
Mr. Cornet. For
2007,
represents a Company contribution of $8,126 under our DPSP for Canadian
employees,
payment of $11,501 in medical, dental, optical and life insurance and
related costs for
the
benefit
of Mr. Cornet, and $1,518
for
the value of items stolen during a business trip.
|
(17)
|
Mr. Sartor
resigned all positions with us and our subsidiaries, including as an
officer and employee, effective June 4, 2008.
|
(18)
|
Upon
Mr. Sartor’s departure from our Company effective June 4, 2008, he
forfeited 81,250 options.
|
(19)
|
For
2008, represents a Company contribution of $1,775 under our DPSP for
Canadian employees and the payment of $3,374 in medical, dental, optical
and life insurance and related costs for the benefit of
Mr. Sartor.
For
2007, represents a Company contribution of $8,126 under our DPSP for
Canadian employees and the payment of $15,109 in medical, dental, optical
and life insurance and related costs for the benefit of
Mr. Sartor.
|
Grants
Of Plan–Based Awards For Fiscal Year 2008
The
following table contains information on the plan–based equity and non–equity
awards granted to our current Named Executive Officers in 2008. Our
former Named Executive Officers were not granted any plan–based equity or
non–equity awards in 2008.
|
|
|
Estimated
Future Payouts Under
Non–Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Threshold
($)
|
|
|
Target
($)
|
|
|
Maximum
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)
|
|
|
Exercise
or Base Price of Option Awards
($
/ Share)
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock and Option Awards
(1)
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Justin
C. Dearborn
|
06/04/2008
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
164,000
|
|
|
08/19/2008
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
176,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
M. Oreskovich
|
06/04/2008
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
82,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nancy
J. Koenig
|
06/04/2008
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
82,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antonia
A. Wells
|
06/04/2008
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
82,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ann
G. Mayberry–French
|
08/19/2008
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
(1)
|
Represents
full grant date fair value as determined in accordance with FAS
123R.
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards At 2008 Fiscal Year–End
The
following table contains information concerning equity awards held by our
current Named Executive Officers that were outstanding as of December 31,
2008. Our former Named Executive Officers did not have any
outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
OPTION
AWARDS
|
|
STOCK
AWARDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number
of Securities Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#) Unexercisable
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
Number
of Shares or
Units of Stock That
Have Not Vested (#)
(1)
|
|
|
Market Value of
Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Justin
C. Dearborn
|
|
|
––
––
|
|
|
|
400,000
200,000
|
|
|
|
0.68
1.47
|
|
06/03/2014
08/18/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
M. Oreskovich
|
|
|
20,000
5,000
35,000
75,000
15,000
––
|
|
|
|
––
––
––
25,000
45,000
200,000
|
|
|
|
15.00
12.96
17.50
8.05
4.99
0.68
|
|
04/01/2010
07/16/2010
05/31/2011
09/05/2012
04/02/2013
06/03/2014
|
|
|
53,333
|
|
|
|
68,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nancy
J. Koenig
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
06/03/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antonia
A. Wells
|
|
|
25,000
7,500
12,500
8,750
––
|
|
|
|
––
2,500
12,500
26,250
200,000
|
|
|
|
17.50
17.82
6.34
4.99
0.68
|
|
05/31/2011
10/19/2011
11/16/2012
04/02/2013
06/03/2014
|
|
|
53,333
|
|
|
|
68,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ann
G. Mayberry–French
|
|
|
––
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
08/18/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
___________________
(1)
|
One
hundred percent (100%)
of
the
restricted
stock will vest on November 24, 2010.
|
(2)
|
Reflects
the value as calculated using the closing market price of our Common Stock
as of the last trading day in fiscal year
2008,
December 31, 2008 ($1.28).
|
In 2008,
none of our Named Executive Officers exercised any of their vested
options.
POTENTIAL
PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
Description
of Agreements Providing for Potential Payments
Prior to
the closing of the investment by Merrick in our Company, we had in place
agreements that required us to provide compensation to certain of our executive
officers in the event of a termination of employment. These
agreements generally called for increased payments if the termination of
employment occurred in connection with a change of control.
With
respect to the restricted stock award agreements of Mr. Oreskovich and
Ms. Wells, the restrictions lapse and the restricted stock becomes fully
vested upon resignation for good reason (as defined in the
agreement). The agreements also provide for the lapse of the
restrictions and full vesting upon: (a) the executive officer’s termination
of employment due to disability; (b) the executive officer’s termination of
employment by us without cause; (c) the executive officer’s involuntary
termination of employment within 365 days after a change in control;
(d) the executive officer’s resignation for good reason within
365 days of a change in control; or (e) the sale by us of the business
unit with respect to which the Named Executive Officer primarily performs
services.
A number of former officers of the Company had employment
agreements with the potential for payment of certain amounts upon termination or
a change in control. However, concurrent with the Merrick transaction
described above, such former officers entered into severance agreements with us,
which resulted in us paying a lower amount to them upon their separation from
the Company. For descriptions of the Named Executive Officer’s
employment agreements, see “Modifications To Our Executive Compensation Program”
above.
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS OF DIRECTORS AT FISCAL YEAR END
The
following table contains information concerning equity awards held by our
Directors that were outstanding as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
Option
Awards
(1)
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Options
(#)
|
|
|
Exercise
Price of Option Awards
($
/ Share)
|
|
Expiration
Date
|
|
Aggregate
Number of Securities Underlying Options
(#)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis
Brown
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
9.78
|
|
05/21/2013
|
|
|
295,000
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
16.19
|
|
05/20/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
17.50
|
|
06/01/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
6.59
|
|
12/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
5.52
|
|
01/30/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
6.01
|
|
05/10/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
08/18/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
W. Ferro, Jr.
|
|
|
400,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
11/19/2018
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
T. Geras
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
1.03
|
|
08/23/2009
|
|
|
297,500
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
05/23/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
8.19
|
|
05/23/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
9.78
|
|
05/21/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
16.19
|
|
05/20/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
17.50
|
|
06/01/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
6.59
|
|
12/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
6.01
|
|
05/10/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
08/18/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregg
G. Hartemayer
|
|
|
225,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
08/18/2018
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
A. Reck
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
7.46
|
|
04/23/2013
|
|
|
285,411
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
9.78
|
|
05/21/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
16.19
|
|
05/20/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
17.50
|
|
06/01/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
6.59
|
|
12/27/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
6.01
|
|
05/10/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
08/18/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neele
E. Stearns, Jr.
|
|
|
300,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
08/18/2018
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
___________________
(1)
|
All
options are fully vested and exercisable, with the exception of the
options granted on August 19, 2008 with an August 18, 2018 expiration
date, and the options granted
on
November 20, 2008 with a November 19, 2018 expiration date, which options
vest and are exercisable as noted below.
|
(2)
|
Options
vest in sixteen (16) equal quarterly increments of 14,062.5 shares, with
the first increment vesting on the date of grant, August 19, 2008, with
subsequent increments
vesting on November 30, February 28, May 31 and
August 31 thereafter.
|
(3)
|
Options
vest in sixteen (16) equal quarterly increments of 25,000 shares, with the
first increment vesting on the date of grant, November 20, 2008, with
subsequent increments
vesting
on February 28, May 31, August 31 and November 30
thereafter.
|
(4)
|
Options
vest in sixteen (16) equal quarterly increments of 18,750 shares, with the
first increment vesting on the date of grant, August 19, 2008, with
subsequent increments
vesting on November 30, February 28, May 31 and
August 31 thereafter.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table shows, as of April 20, 2009, the beneficial ownership of shares
of the Common Stock, by: (i) each person that is known to us to
beneficially own or exercise the voting or dispositive control of five percent
(5%) or more of the outstanding Common Stock; (ii) each of our current, and
certain of our former Directors, and a Named Executive Officer,
including: Dr. Barish, Messrs. Dunham and Geras,
Ms. Hajek, Messrs. Lennox, Moley, Quinn and Ramkumar, each a former
Director, and Mr. Rardin, a former Named Executive Officer and Director;
and (iii) all of our Directors and executive officers as a
group. Except pursuant to marital property laws or as otherwise
indicated in the footnotes to the table, the persons named below have sole
voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by
such persons. In general, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial
owner” of a security if that person has or shares the power to vote or direct
the voting of such security, or the power to dispose of or to direct the
disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a
beneficial owner of any securities of which the person has the right to acquire
the beneficial ownership within sixty (60) days.
Name and Address of
Beneficial Owner (1)
|
|
Shares Beneficially
Owned
(2)
|
|
|
Percentage
of Total
Outstanding
|
|
Merrick
RIS, LLC / Michael W. Ferro, Jr.
|
|
|
28,189,837
|
|
|
|
49.65
|
%
|
Glenhill Advisors,
LLC (3)
|
|
|
2,800,000
|
|
|
|
4.93
|
%
|
Robert A. Barish, M.
D. (4)
|
|
|
62,781
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Dennis
Brown
|
|
|
538,177
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Justin
C. Dearborn
|
|
|
140,022
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Michel
D. Dunham (4)
|
|
|
29,412
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Robert
T. Geras
|
|
|
381,841
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Anna
Marie Hajek (4)
|
|
|
16,859
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Gregg
G. Hartemayer
|
|
|
144,890
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Nancy
J. Koenig
|
|
|
72,160
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
R.
Ian Lennox (4)
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Ann
G. Mayberry–French
|
|
|
23,174
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Kevin
E. Moley (4)
|
|
|
26,249
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Steven M. Oreskovich
(5)
|
|
|
293,092
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Kevin
G. Quinn (4)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Ramamritham
Ramkumar (4)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Kenneth
D. Rardin (4)
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Richard
A. Reck
|
|
|
366,299
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Neele
E. Stearns, Jr.
|
|
|
296,610
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
Antonia
A. Wells (5)
|
|
|
177,180
|
|
|
|
(*
|
)
|
All
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
(19 persons)
|
|
|
30,809,518
|
|
|
|
54.27
|
%
|
___________________
(*)
|
Less
than 1% of outstanding Common Stock.
|
(2)
|
Includes
the following number of shares of Common Stock which may be acquired upon
the exercise of stock options which are currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of
April
20, 2009: 75,000 for Mr. Ferro; 126,250 for
Mr. Brown; 100,000 for Mr. Dearborn; 128,750 for Mr. Geras;
56,250 for Mr. Hartemayer; 50,000 for Ms Koenig; 215,000 for
Mr.
Oreskovich;
116,661 for Mr. Reck; 75,000 for Mr. Stearns; and 112,500 for
Ms. Wells.
|
(3)
|
As
reported on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Commission on February 14,
2008 jointly by Glenhill Advisors, LLC, Glenn J. Krevlin, Glenhill Capital
Management, LLC and
Glenhill
Capital, LP. Mr. Krevlin is the managing member and
control person of Glenhill Advisors, LLC. According to the
Schedule 13G/A, each of Glenhill Advisors, LLC and Mr.
Krevlin
have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 2,800,000 shares of
our Common Stock.
|
(4)
|
Ownership
of shares of Common Stock known to us to be held at their respective dates
of resignation as a Director.
|
(5)
|
Includes
53,333 shares of Restricted Common Stock granted on November 24, 2007,
which shares shall become 100% vested and non–forfeitable on the third
anniversary of the
grant
date.
|
SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a)
of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, members of our Board, and
persons who own more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of our equity
securities, to file initial statements of beneficial ownership (Form 3),
and statements of changes in beneficial ownership (Forms 4 or 5). The
Commission requires executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent
(10%) shareholders to furnish us with copies of all these forms filed with the
Commission.
To our
knowledge, based solely upon our review of the copies of these forms received by
us, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no additional
forms were required for those persons, we believe that all of our executive
officers and Directors complied with their reporting obligations during 2008,
with the exception of the following: A Form 4 was filed on June 9,
2008, on behalf of Nancy J. Koenig with respect to the reporting of an option
grant made on June 4, 2008 and an open market purchase made on June 5, 2008, and
a Form 4 was filed on June 10, 2008, on behalf of Neele E. Stearns, Jr. with
respect to the reporting of an open market purchase made on June 5, 2008, each
of which filings were not made on a timely basis due to the delay in securing
Edgar access codes upon their appointment as an executive officer or Director of
the Company. A Form 4 was filed on June 30, 2008, on behalf of Kevin
G. Quinn with respect to open market purchases made on June 12, 2008 and June
20, 2008, and the respective share purchase rights attaching to such shares,
which rights were called for redemption on June 23, 2008.
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSAL TWO – RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF BDO
SEIDMAN,
LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2009
BACKGROUND
The Audit
Committee of our Board has selected BDO Seidman, LLP to serve as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009. BDO Seidman, LLP was our independent registered public
accounting firm and has audited our consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008 and the consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders’ equity, comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for the
year then ended. Prior to that time, KPMG LLP had served as our
independent registered public accounting firm.
Representatives
of BDO Seidman will be present at our Annual Meeting. They will have
the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and to respond to
appropriate questions.
REASONS
FOR THE PROPOSAL
Selection
of our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to be
submitted for shareholder approval, but the Audit Committee of our Board is
seeking ratification of its selection of BDO Seidman, LLP as a matter of good
corporate practice. If our shareholders do not ratify this selection,
the Audit Committee of our Board will consider it a direction to select another
independent registered public accounting firm for 2009. Even if the
selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, appoint a
different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the
year if it determines that such a change would be in our and our shareholders’
best interests.
VOTE
REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
To ratify
the selection of BDO Seidman, LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm, the votes cast for ratification must be the majority of shares
present and entitled to vote (in person or by proxy) at the Annual
Meeting. Unless otherwise specified, the proxies solicited hereby
will be voted in favor of the ratification of BDO Seidman, LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for 2009.
CHANGE
IN INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
On
June 24, 2008, we notified KPMG LLP on behalf of the Audit Committee that,
effective June 24, 2008, we would be replacing KPMG LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm.
During
our fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007 and the
subsequent period through June 24, 2008, we have not had any disagreements with
KPMG LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if
not resolved to KPMG LLP’s satisfaction, would have caused KPMG LLP to make
reference thereto in their reports on the financial statements for such
years.
On
June 24, 2008, the Audit Committee decided to engage BDO Seidman, LLP as
our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year
2008. BDO Seidman, LLP formally accepted the engagement on
June 26, 2008, and we and BDO Seidman, LLP entered into an engagement
letter on that date. We did not engage BDO Seidman, LLP in any
consultations prior to June 26, 2008.
RECOMMENDATION
OF THE BOARD
The
Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” ratification of the selection of BDO
Seidman, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2009
fiscal year.
AUDIT
AND NON-AUDIT FEES
The
following table presents fees for professional services rendered by BDO Seidman,
LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
2008
|
|
Audit
fees
(1)
|
|
$
|
337,000
|
|
Audit–related
fees
|
|
|
–
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
–
|
|
All
other fees
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total
fees
|
|
$
|
337,000
|
|
(1)
|
Audit
fees include fees for the annual financial statement audit, quarterly
reviews, consents and review of, and assistance with, Current Reports on
Form 8–K. In 2008, management’s report on internal control
over financial reporting was not subject to attestation by BDO Seidman,
LLP pursuant to temporary rules of the Commission that permitted the
Company to provide only a report from management.
The
Company did not pay any fees to BDO Seidman, LLP in 2007.
|
POLICY ON AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE–APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND PERMISSIBLE
NON–AUDIT SERVICES OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
Consistent
with the Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”)
requirements regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has
responsibility for appointing, setting compensation and overseeing the work of
the independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of
this responsibility, the Audit Committee has established a policy to pre–approve
all audit and permissible non–audit services provided by the independent
registered public accounting firm.
Prior to
engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm for each year’s
audit, management will submit a list to the Audit Committee for its approval of
services and related fees expected to be rendered and fees expected to be
incurred during that year within each of four (4) categories of services to the
Audit Committee for approval.
|
·
|
Audit
services include audit work performed on the financial statements and
internal control over financial reporting, as well as work that generally
only the independent registered public accounting firm can reasonably be
expected to provide, including quarterly reviews, comfort letters,
statutory audits, and discussions surrounding the proper application of
financial accounting and/or reporting
standards.
|
|
·
|
Audit–Related
services are for assurance and related services that are traditionally
performed by the independent registered public accounting firm, including
due diligence related to mergers and acquisitions, employee benefit plan
audits, and special procedures required to meet certain regulatory
requirements.
|
|
·
|
Tax
services include all services, except those services specifically related
to the audit of the financial statements, performed by the independent
registered public accounting firm’s tax personnel, including tax analysis;
assisting with coordination of execution of tax–related activities,
primarily in the area of corporate development; supporting other
tax–related regulatory requirements; and tax compliance and
reporting. The Company generally does not request such services
from the independent registered public accounting
firm.
|
|
·
|
All
Other
services are those services not captured in the audit,
audit–related or tax categories. The Company generally does not
request such services from the independent registered public accounting
firm.
|
The Audit Committee
requires the independent registered public accounting firm and management to
report actual fees versus the budget periodically throughout the year by
category of service. During the year, circumstances may arise when it
may become necessary to engage the independent registered public accounting firm
for additional services not contemplated in the original pre–approval
categories. In those instances, the Audit Committee requires specific
pre–approval before engaging the independent registered public accounting
firm. The Audit Committee may delegate pre–approval authority to one
or more of its members. The member to whom such authority is
delegated must report any pre–approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its
next scheduled meeting.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT
The
information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting
material” or “filed” or incorporated by reference in future filings with the
Commission, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange
Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into
a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act.
We, the
members of the Audit Committee, represent the following:
1.
|
The
Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial
statements with management;
|
2.
|
The
Audit Committee has discussed with BDO Seidman, LLP, the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2008, the
matters required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards
No. 114, as may be modified or
supplemented;
|
3.
|
The
Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from
BDO Seidman, LLP required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
rule that relates to independence (Rule 3526), as may be modified or
supplemented, and has discussed with BDO Seidman, LLP, its independence as
the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm;
and
|
4.
|
Based
on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee
recommended to our Board that the audited financial statements be included
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, for filing with the
Commission.
|
The
Audit Committee
·
Neele
E. Stearns, Jr., Chairperson
·
Dennis
Brown
·
Richard
A. Reck
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS
We did
not receive any shareholder proposals for inclusion in this year’s Proxy
Statement. If a shareholder wishes to present a proposal to be
included in the proxy statement for the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the
proposal must be submitted in writing and received by our General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary at our offices no later than December 28, 2009.
To bring business before
an Annual Meeting, a shareholder must submit a timely notice that complies with
the requirements of our Bylaws. Our Bylaws require, among other
things, that the notice contain a brief description of the business desired to
be brought before the meeting and, if such business includes a proposal to amend
our Bylaws, the language of the proposed amendment, the shareholder’s reasons
for conducting the business at the meeting and any material interest in such
business of the shareholder. Our Bylaws are available free of charge
on file with the Commission, by searching the EDGAR archives at
www.sec.gov
,
on line at
www.merge.com/about/governance.aspx
,
or by written request to our General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at 6737
West Washington Street, Suite 2250, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
53214–5650.
ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10
–
K
We will
provide without charge to each person to whom a copy of this Proxy Statement has
been delivered, upon written or oral request, a copy of our Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10–K
for the
year ended December 31, 2008. Requests should be made to the
General Counsel and
Corporate
Secretary at our principal executive offices located at 6737 West Washington
Street, Suite 2250, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53214–5650; telephone number
(414) 977–4000 or at
shareholderinfo@merge.com
.
Appendix
A
MERGE
HEALTHCARE INCORPORATED
AUDIT
COMMITTEE CHARTER
A.
Purpose
The Audit
Committee (the “
Committee
”)
of the Board of Directors (the “
Board
”)
of Merge Healthcare Incorporated (the “
Company
”)
shall oversee the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the
audits of the Company’s financial statements, and shall otherwise exercise
oversight responsibility, and assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight
functions, with respect to matters involving the accounting, auditing, financial
reporting and internal control functions of the Company. In so doing,
it shall be the goal of the Committee to maintain free and open means of
communication between the members of the Board, the independent registered
public accountants who audit the Company’s financial statements (the “
Public
Accountants
”), the Company’s management and the persons performing the
Company’s internal audit function.
B.
Composition
The
Committee shall be comprised of three (3) or more directors, as determined by
the Board on the recommendation of the Nominating Committee of the
Board. Each member of the Committee shall be “independent” as defined
by the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“
NASDAQ
”)
and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “
SEC
”)
that are applicable to audit committee members. Each committee member
shall also be free from any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board,
would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment as a member
of the Committee.
All
members of the Committee shall have a basic understanding of finance and
accounting and be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements,
including the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations
and statements of cash flows. At least one member of the Committee
shall have accounting or related financial management expertise consisting of
employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional
certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or background, which
results in the individual’s financial sophistication, including being or having
been a chief executive officer, chief financial officer or other senior officer
with financial oversight responsibilities.
The
Committee shall comply with any other audit committee composition requirements
of NASDAQ and the SEC.
C.
Meetings
The
Committee shall meet with such frequency and at such intervals as it shall
determine necessary to carry out its duties and responsibilities, but not less
than quarterly. In addition, the Committee shall hold any special
meetings as may be necessary or called by the Chairperson of the Committee or at
the request of the Public Accountants or the Company’s
management. Representatives of the Public Accountants, members of the
Company’s management and others may attend meetings of the Committee at the
invitation of the Committee and shall provide pertinent information as
necessary. As part of its purpose to foster open and candid
communication, the Committee shall meet periodically as necessary with the
Public Accountants, the Company’s management and any others that the Committee
invites to meet with it in separate executive sessions to discuss any matters
that the Committee or these individuals believe should be discussed privately
with the Committee. The Committee may meet via telephone conference
calls or take action in writing executed by all of the
members. Except as otherwise specifically provided for in this
Charter, a quorum shall consist of three members.
Unless
the Board elects a Chairperson of the Committee (the “
Chairperson
”),
the Committee shall elect a Chairperson by majority vote. The
Chairperson of the Committee shall set the agenda of each meeting and arrange
for the distribution of the agenda, together with supporting material, to the
Committee members prior to each meeting. The Chairperson will also
cause minutes of each meeting to be prepared and circulated to the Committee
members.
D.
Functions
In
carrying out its functions, the Committee’s policies and procedures shall remain
flexible, so that it may be in a position to react or respond to changing
circumstances or conditions. No less than annually, the Committee
shall conduct a performance evaluation of the Committee and an evaluation of the
adequacy of this Charter.
The
Committee’s functions may be divided into the following general
categories: (1) overseeing financial reporting,
(2) evaluating independent audit processes, (3) reviewing internal
controls established by management, and (4) other functions. The
Committee shall:
1.
|
Financial
Information and Reports
|
a.
|
Review
with the Public Accountants and the Company’s management the interim
financial statements to be included in each of the Company’s Quarterly
Reports on Form 10–Q prior to the public announcement of financial results
and the filing of the Form 10–Q with the
SEC.
|
b.
|
Review
with the Public Accountants, the Company’s management and the persons
performing the Company’s internal audit function, the Company’s annual
financial statements to be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10–K prior to the public announcement of financial results and the filing
of the Form 10–K with the SEC.
|
c.
|
Review
the disclosure under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in each Annual Report on
Form 10–K and Quarterly Report on Form 10–Q, prior to the filing thereof
with the SEC.
|
d.
|
Review
the Company’s press releases announcing financial results or financial
forecasts of the Company prior to their
dissemination.
|
e.
|
Discuss
with the Public Accountants their judgments about the quality, not just
the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles and financial
disclosure practices used or proposed and the appropriateness of
significant management judgments.
|
f.
|
Discuss
with the Company’s management and the Public Accountants the effect of
regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as any off–balance sheet
structures, on the Company’s financial
statements.
|
g.
|
Review
a report from the Public Accountants periodically, but no less than
annually, as to (i) all critical accounting policies to be used,
(ii) all alternative disclosures and treatments of financial
information within generally accepted accounting principles (“
GAAP
”)
that have been discussed with the Company’s management, the ramifications
of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments and the
disclosures and treatments preferred by the Public Accountants, and
(iii) other material written communications between the Public
Accountants and the Company’s management, including management letters and
schedules of unadjusted
differences.
|
h.
|
Recommend
to the Board, based upon the review and discussion described above,
whether the consolidated financial statements should be included in the
Company’s Annual Reports on Form
10–K.
|
i.
|
Based
upon discussions with, and reliance upon, the Public Accountants and the
Company’s management, prepare any audit committee reports or other audit
committee–related disclosure, in filings with the SEC or otherwise,
required by applicable securities laws, rules and regulations or by the
rules of any securities exchange or market on which securities of the
Company are listed, including a report to be included in the Company’s
annual meeting proxy statement stating whether the Committee has
(i) reviewed and discussed the audited financial statement with
management, (ii) discussed with the Public Accountants the matters
required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61,
(iii) received from the Public Accountants disclosures regarding
their independence required by Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1 and (iv) discussed with the Public Accountants their
independence. The proxy statement shall also contain a
statement as to whether the Committee members are independent and that the
Committee has adopted a charter.
|
j.
|
Periodically,
but no less than annually, review the financial statements and related
reports for the Company’s retirement
plan(s).
|
a.
|
Be
directly responsible for the appointment, retention, replacement or
termination, compensation and oversight of the work of the Public
Accountants, including resolution of disagreements between the Company’s
management and the Public Accountants regarding issues relating to
accounting standards, financial reporting and disclosure, and other
related issues that the Committee deems to be in its
purview.
|
b.
|
Pre–approve
all audit services and permitted non–audit services (including the fees
and terms thereof) to be performed for the Company by the Public
Accountants, in a manner consistent with applicable law and policies
established by the Committee. The Committee may delegate,
subject to any rules or limitations it deems appropriate, to one or more
designated members of the Committee the authority to grant such
pre–approvals;
provided
,
however
,
that the decisions of any member to whom authority is so delegated to
pre–approve an activity shall be presented to the full Committee for
ratification at its next meeting.
|
c.
|
On
an annual basis, review the Public Accountants’ independence and
objectivity by (i) inquiring into matters such as all relationships
between the Public Accountants and the Company and (ii) reviewing
annual disclosures from the Public Accountants regarding their
independence as required by Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1.
|
d.
|
On
an annual basis, obtain and review a report from the Public Accountants
concerning their internal quality control review of the firm, any inquiry
or investigation by governmental or professional authorities within the
preceding five (5) years respecting one or more independent audits carried
out by the firm and any steps taken to address material issues raised by
such review or any such inquiry or
investigation.
|
e.
|
Review
the experience and qualifications of the senior members of the Public
Accountants’ team.
|
f.
|
Review
the annual audit plan of the Public Accountants and evaluate their
performance and adherence to the prior year’s audit
plan.
|
g.
|
Confirm
that the Public Accountants have complied with the requirements of
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, concerning the rotation of
the lead audit and reviewing
partners.
|
h.
|
Review
and approve (or veto) the Company’s hiring of employees or former
employees of the Public Accountants who participated in any capacity in
the audits of the Company.
|
i.
|
Following
completion of the annual audit, review separately with the Company’s
management and the Public Accountants the effectiveness of the audit
effort, including any significant difficulties encountered during the
course of the audit and any restrictions on the scope of work or access to
required information.
|
3.
|
Risk
Management and Controls
|
a.
|
Inquire
of the Public Accountants and the Company’s management about significant
risks or exposures and assess the steps which management has taken to
minimize such risks and monitor control of these
areas.
|
b.
|
Review
with the Public Accountants and the Company’s Management their findings on
the adequacy and effectiveness of internal controls (including the annual
deficiency report prepared by the Public Accountants pursuant to Section
404 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002) and their recommendations for
improving the internal control environment, including management’s
controls and security procedures with respect to the Company’s information
systems.
|
c.
|
Review
with the Public Accountants and the Company’s management the extent to
which changes or improvements in financial or accounting practices have
been implemented. This review will be conducted at an
appropriate time subsequent to the changes or
improvements.
|
d.
|
Periodically
review with the Company’s legal counsel matters that could have a
significant impact on the Company’s financial statements, such as
compliance with laws, rules and regulations, litigation and inquiries
received from governmental agencies and
regulators.
|
e.
|
Review
and approve the appointment, replacement, reassignment or dismissal of the
Company’s principal financial officer, the Company’s principal accounting
officer and the Director of Internal Audit (or person fulfilling such
function).
|
f.
|
Review
the plans, activities, staff, organizational structure and effectiveness
of the internal audit function with the Company’s
management. Review findings and recommendations from completed
internal audits, together with management responses, and a progress report
on the internal audit plan, with explanations for any deviations from the
original plan.
|
g.
|
Review
with the Public Accountants, the Company’s management and the persons
performing the Company’s internal audit function, any incidents of fraud,
whether or not material.
|
a.
|
Establish
and maintain procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of
complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal
accounting controls, or auditing
matters.
|
b.
|
Establish
and maintain procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission by
Company employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or
auditing matters.
|
c.
|
Review
and approve (or veto) related party transactions, and resolve conflicts of
interest questions, involving Board members or senior management (as
defined and required by applicable securities laws, rules and regulations
and the rules of the NASDAQ).
|
d.
|
Oversee
and review the Company’s asset management policies, including an annual
review of the Company’s investment policies and performance for cash and
short–term investments.
|
e.
|
Monitor
compliance with applicable laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act and the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of
2002.
|
f.
|
Monitor
compliance with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and
approve any waivers under such
Code.
|
g.
|
No
less than annually, evaluate the adequacy of the Company’s Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics and make recommendations to the Board with
respect to any proposed changes.
|
h.
|
Review
and monitor compliance with financial covenants under any Company credit
facilities and debt instruments.
|
i.
|
Conduct
or authorize investigations into any matter within the Committee’s scope
of responsibilities that the Committee deems appropriate for
investigation.
|
j.
|
Have
the authority to retain independent counsel, accountants or other
advisors, as the Committee determines necessary or appropriate to carry
out its duties.
|
k.
|
Consider
whether Committee members are provided with appropriate background
information and training and, when necessary, seek such information and
training from the Company’s management, the Public Accountants and/or
other third–party sources.
|
l.
|
Establish
appropriate fees, which the Company shall provide, for payment of
(i) compensation to the Public Accountants engaged for the purpose of
preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or
attest services for the Company, (ii) compensation to any advisors
engaged by the Committee and to any third–party sources providing
background information and/or training to Committee members, and
(iii) ordinary administrative expenses of the Committee that are
necessary or appropriate in carrying out its
duties.
|
m.
|
Perform
such other functions as are assigned by law, the rules of NASDAQ, the
Company’s charter or bylaws, or the Board of
Directors.
|
n.
|
Regularly
report its activities, findings and conclusions to the full
Board.
|
E.
Scope of Responsibilities
While the
Committee has the functions set forth in this Charter, it is not the duty of the
Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company’s financial
statements are complete and accurate or are in accordance with
GAAP. The Company’s management is principally responsible for Company
accounting policies, the preparation of the financial statements and ensuring
that the financial statements are prepared in accordance with
GAAP. Management is also responsible for implementing procedures
designed to ensure that the Company and its employees comply with applicable
laws and regulations and with the Company’s applicable ethics
standards. The Public Accountants are responsible for auditing and
attesting to the Company’s financial statements and understanding the Company’s
system of internal controls in order to plan and to determine the nature, timing
and extent of audit procedures to be performed.
2009
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
MERGE
HEALTHCARE INCORPORATED
June
12, 2009
NOTICE OF INTERNET
AVAILAILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL
:
This
Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, Annual Report on Form 10–K, and
proxy card are available at
www.merge.com/annualmeeting/
Please
date, sign and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as
possible.
¯
Please detach along perforated line and
mail in the envelope
provided.
¯
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN
PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN
BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE
|
1.Elect
six (6) individuals to serve as Directors until the next annual meeting of
Shareholders or otherwise as provided in the Company’s Bylaws (check one
box).
|
2.Ratify
the Company’s appointment of BDO Seidman, LLP as the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm for the 2009 fiscal
year.
|
FOR AGAINSTABSTAIN
|
FOR
ALL NOMINEES
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL
NOMINEES
FOR ALL
EXCEPT
|
NOMINEES:
¡
Dennis
Brown
¡
Justin
C. Dearborn
¡
Michael
W. Ferro, Jr.
¡
Gregg
G. Hartemayer
¡
Richard
A. Reck
¡
Neele
E. Stearns, Jr.
|
|
|
To
withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “
FOR ALL EXCEPT
” and fill
in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown
here:
n
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To
change the address on your account, please check the box at right and
indicate your new address in the address space above. Please
note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be
submitted via this method.
|
|
In
their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other
business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any
adjournment or postponement thereof.
|
YOUR
VOTE IS IMPORTANT. THE PROMPT RETURN OF PROXIES WILL SAVE THE
COMPANY THE EXPENSE OF FURTHER REQUESTS FOR PROXIES. PLEASE
PROMPTLY MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED
ENVELOPE.
|
The
Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all director nominees and FOR
proposal number two.
|
Signature
of Shareholder
|
|
Date:
|
|
Signature
of Shareholder
|
|
Date:
|
|
Note:Please
sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When
shares are hold jointly, each holder should sign. When signing
as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give
full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign
corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as
such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership
name by an authorized person.
|
MERGE
HEALTHCARE INCORPORATED
6737
WEST WASHINGTON STREET
SUITE
2250
MILWAUKEE,
WISCONSIN 53214–5650
THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The
undersigned hereby appoints William S. Hogan and Alessio Nasini, and each of
them, as Proxies, with the power to appoint their substitutes, and hereby
authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated below, all of the shares
of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Merge Healthcare Incorporated
(the “Company”) held of record by the undersigned on April 17, 2009, at the 2009
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 12, 2009, or any adjournment
or postponement thereof.
This
proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by
the undersigned Shareholder. If no direction is made, this proxy will
be voted FOR the proposals set forth herein.
(Continued
and to be signed on the reverse side)
Mirage Energy (PK) (USOTC:MRGE)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Mirage Energy (PK) (USOTC:MRGE)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024