warfaretrader
1 month ago
Looks like the CASE #1 has been settled. Anyone want to guess what's coming next??
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
DISTRICT COURT
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Green Valley Associates Inc.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Service 800, Inc,
Defendant.
Court File No. 27-CV-20-13800
STIPULATION FOR STAY OF ACTIONS
PENDING GLOBAL RESOLUTION
Jean Mork Bredeson,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Service, 800, Inc. and Beyond Commerce,
Defendants.
Court File No. 27-CV-20-3476
Beyond Commerce, Inc.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Warner Law, LLC and Jean Mork Bredeson,
Defendants.
Court File No. 27-CV-23-18582
The parties to the above-referenced actions, Green Valley Associates Inc., Warner Law,
LLC and Jean Mork Bredeson (collectively, the “Bredeson Parties”) on the one hand, and
Beyond Commerce, Inc., and Service 800, Inc. (collectively, the “BYOC Parties”), on the other
hand, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
27-CV-20-3476 Filed in District Court
State of Minnesota
8/22/2024 4:39 PM
2
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2024, the Bredeson Parties and the BYOC Parties
(collectively, the “Parties”) participated in a mediation session with Ret. Justice James H.
Gilbert;
WHEREAS, the Parties were able to reach a global meditated settlement that was
documented and signed by all Parties and their counsel that would resolve all three actions;
WHEREAS, the settlement agreement set forth certain contingencies that require action
or approval by third parties in order to effectuate the terms of settlement;
WHEREAS, the Parties have been diligently working to resolve these contingencies,
including by submitting documentation to these third parties that would satisfy the contingencies,
and the Parties have been drafting documentation necessary to effectuate the transfers
contemplated by the settlement agreement;
WHEREAS, the Parties agreed that Ret. Justice James H. Gilbert will be the binding
decision-maker with regard to any disputes that arise in finalizing the transfers contemplated by
the settlement agreement such that the Parties do not contemplate need of further judicial
intervention or assistance in any of these actions;
WHEREAS, the Parties seek to avoid incurring any further expenses that could prevent
the finalization of the settlement, and, in the interest of judicial economy and a just resolution of
all three disputes, the Parties seek to focus all efforts on accomplishing this result.
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as
follows:
(1) The Parties agree that the aforementioned actions can be stayed or placed on
inactive status, provided that the Court(s) will allow the same; and
27-CV-20-3476 Filed in District Court
State of Minnesota
8/22/2024 4:39 PM
3
(2) Within 30 days of entry, the Parties shall file a stipulation for dismissal with
prejudice of these actions or provide a joint update to the Courts, via a written submission, as to
the status of the resolution.
Dated: August 22, 2024 THOM ELLINGSON, PLLP
/s/ Samantha J. Ellingson
Aaron R. Thom (#0392646)
Samantha J. Ellingson (#0397448)
athom@thomellingson.com
sellingson@thomellingson.com
45 South 7th Street, Suite 2610
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: (612) 286-0505
Fax: (612) 601-8955
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Beyond Commerce, LLC and Service,
800, Inc.
Dated: August 22, 2024 BASSFORD REMELE, A Professional
Association
/s/ Bryce D. Riddle
Jessica L. Klander (#392290)
Bryce D. Riddle (#398019)
100 South 5th Street, Suite 1500
Minneapolis, MN 55402-1254
Telephone: (612) 333-3000
Facsimile: (612) 333-8829
jklander@bassford.com
briddle@bassford.com
Attorneys for Defendants Warner Law,
LLC and Jean Mork Bredeson in Case
No. 27-CV-23-18582
warfaretrader
9 months ago
The latest filing on the 2nd case. The judge denied the motion for reconsideration. BYOC is most likely going to be on the hook for over 2.5 million dollars with loses in both cases. Both judges have ruled in favor of Jean in Summary Judgments in both cases. What I don't get is how does she think they're going to pay here anything. BYOC/Service800 is broke. I suppose they could give here Service 800 back, which in my opinion would be the best thing possible. I don't see any lender giving them a cent, especially with the lawsuit pending from Discover.
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
_________________________________________________________________________________
Green Valley Associates Inc.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Service 800, Inc,
Defendant and
Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
Jean Mork Bredeson,
Third-Party Defendant.
_________________________________________________________________________________
The above-captioned matter is before the undersigned Judge of District Court on
Defendant’s request for permission to move for reconsideration. The request was made
in a letter filed on December 12, 2023. Plaintiff filed a letter opposing the request on
December 12, 2023. Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court
makes the following:
Order
Defendant’s request for permission to move for reconsideration is denied.
By the Court:
Dated: December 29, 2023
Bridget A. Sullivan
Judge of District Court
warfaretrader
10 months ago
BYOC has now filed a lawsuit against the Jean and here Attorney. Gee it only took them years to bring suit against here and just pay the fee for doing so. Any coming that files a lawsuit against an individual has to pay a fee, don't remember how much but it's definitely worth it. BYOC screwed up on not having certain important documents like exhibit 296 due to missing the window for discovery. This one exhibit would have most likely shown the fraud by Jean.
Plaintiff’s lead counsel, Warner Law, was surprised to receive service of the
attached summons and complaint on November 20, a new lawsuit brought by
Beyond Commerce, Inc. against both George Warner’s law firm, Warner Law, LLC
and Jean Mork Bredeson, the plaintiff in this case (the new complaint is dated the
same day (Nov. 17) as our status conference with the Court about rescheduling
trial). The new complaint purports to state claims for “conversion by wrongful
levy,” “trespass by wrongful levy,” “civil theft,” “receiving stolen property,” and
unjust enrichment.
These claims arise in the context of Plaintiff’s attempts to collect on the judgment
for $2,464,496 issued by Your Honor in this case against BYOC on June 14, 2023.
BYOC counsel had objected to Plaintiff’s collection efforts in emails and we
suggested that they cite their legal authority for claiming Plaintiff’s efforts were
unjustified and/or that they bring their objections before Your Honor but,
obviously, they decided on a different tactic.
While this latest maneuver by BYOC and its lawyers may or may not form the
basis of Rule 11 sanctionable conduct, a violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.3
(Candor Toward the Tribunal), or other guardrails to curtail over-zealous,
vexatious, and unreasonable attorney misconduct, this certainly complicates this
case and, in particular, rescheduling trial. Thus, we wanted to make the Court
aware of this development.
January trial dates now seem infeasible, regardless of the schedules of the parties,
counsel, and witnesses. We will update the Court as we evaluate the ramifications
of this latest development and decide how we need to proceed with respect to the
later trial dates proposed by the Court on November 17 (i.e., 3/11-3/29).
December 1, 2023
27-CV-20-3476
Thank you,
Filed in District Court
State of Minnesota
12/1/2023 4:51 PM
Seth Leventhal