ADVFN Logo
Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
CTR Investments and Consulting Inc New (PK)

CTR Investments and Consulting Inc New (PK) (CIVX)

0.0006
-0.0001
(-14.29%)
Closed July 07 4:00PM

Real-time discussions and trading ideas: Trade with confidence with our powerful platform.

Key stats and details

Current Price
0.0006
Bid
0.0006
Ask
0.0007
Volume
561,285
0.0006 Day's Range 0.0007
0.0001 52 Week Range 0.0012
Previous Close
0.0007
Open
0.0007
Last Trade Time
Average Volume (3m)
5,891,137
Financial Volume
$ 358
VWAP
0.000637

CIVX Latest News

No news to show yet.
PeriodChangeChange %OpenHighLowAvg. Daily VolVWAP
1-0.0001-14.28571428570.00070.00080.000639643960.00067744CS
4-0.0003-33.33333333330.00090.00120.000694106180.00094075CS
120.00042000.00020.00120.000158911370.00080639CS
260.00031000.00030.00120.000155376680.00057516CS
520.0002500.00040.00120.000139974410.00050188CS
156-0.0059-90.76923076920.00650.01360.000187009900.00359917CS
2600.000599599001.0E-60.01361.0E-6109675100.00305035CS

Movers

View all
  • Most Active
  • % Gainers
  • % Losers
SymbolPriceVol.
BENFBeneficient
$ 4.785
(122.56%)
46.48M
SHOTWSafety Shot Inc
$ 0.33
(83.33%)
1.6k
QLGNQualigen Therapeutics Inc
$ 0.28
(59.64%)
244.69M
INVZWInnoviz Technologies Ltd
$ 0.2499
(51.91%)
17.79k
ZAPPZapp Electric Vehicles Group Ltd
$ 4.06
(49.26%)
50.34M
VEVVicinity Motor Corporation
$ 0.391
(-30.67%)
409.44k
SKYESkye Bioscience Inc
$ 5.495
(-26.34%)
354.28k
CLEUChina Liberal Education Holdings Ltd
$ 2.16
(-24.74%)
13.42M
JZXNJiuzi Holdings Inc
$ 2.60
(-23.53%)
57.7k
WHLRWheeler Real Estate Investment Trust Inc
$ 15.02
(-23.01%)
30.36k
MAXNMaxeon Solar Technologies Ltd
$ 0.2378
(36.98%)
520.76M
QLGNQualigen Therapeutics Inc
$ 0.28
(59.64%)
244.69M
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
$ 125.83
(-1.91%)
214.21M
TSLATesla Inc
$ 251.52
(2.08%)
154.53M
SIRISirius XM Holdings Inc
$ 3.715
(5.24%)
121.14M

CIVX Discussion

View Posts
Stino2 Stino2 2 hours ago
Hi Lo, go away, find a job.
You don’t have any CIVX stocks.
I have them since 2006
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 12 hours ago
Agreed
👍️0
LCJR LCJR 12 hours ago
.011 should be good for many to cash out, but you’ll have to be quick. I’ve already got my order in.

LCJR
👍️ 1 💯 1
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 12 hours ago
Guy has failed at trading his entire life and now tries to be some guru activist that has only false accusations. Where were you at the last 4 years on all these stocks lol
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 13 hours ago
You forgot the last part you dumbass
😂 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 13 hours ago
You provided nothing just copy and pasted pages
Yes. That's called documentation, you dolt.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 13 hours ago
You provided nothing just copy and pasted pages that you can’t even read yourself and have nothing to do with CIVX.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 13 hours ago
I provide verifiable documentation. All you provide are lies.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 14 hours ago
And GVSI ran to .077 huge gains.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173788321

Just Sharp destroying people's lives.

Something doesn't add up here and more double-talk coming from you.
💥 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 14 hours ago
Pink Current and all brokerages are trading it

Who cares who is trading CIVX in OTC Markets if it will never get a merger approved by the SEC.
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 14 hours ago
And GVSI ran to .077 huge gains. The same thing can happen here. That's what you don't comprehend. Buy low and sell high. Why do you buy high and sell low? Youve got to be the dumbest trader I've ever exchanged messages with, it's actually entertaining watching you fail bigtime and seeing your jealousy and attacks on other posters. CIVX did an excellent job at expediting their filings to OTCIQ for a good reason.
👍️ 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 14 hours ago
Doesn't apply here. CIVX is Pink Current and completely compliant with OTC Markets. No corporate actions needed.
That is the same exact lie you were pushing on the GVSI board right before the reverse merger you pumped for three years spectacularly imploded and then came your sobbing...

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173788321

Just Sharp destroying people's lives.

You sound like you lost a ton of money on that day. Poetic justice. LOL!!!

GVSI's merger imploded because GVSI is not SEC registered and in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 (just like this garbage) which made the merger fail.

As you lied and distorted information for your pump and dump for three years, I warned everyone that no merger would ever happen, it would dive below a penny and continue to fall and I was right.

The same will happen here but the price will drop even lower.

No merger coming for CIVX per SEC/FINRA regulations...no matter what you or the CEO of a penny stock company pumps in a press release to promote the company.

CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 because of its 13 years of missing financials and all publicly traded stocks need to conform with FINRA Rule 6490.

There is a huge gap of missing financials from 2008 - 2020 which means CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 which will prevent CIVX from getting any corporate actions such as a merger approved by SEC/FINRA. The same thing caused GVSI's catastrophic collapse. Look at that ticker as a good example of what will happen here.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/disclosure



More proof CIVX is a dirty shell and a scam.

HOW FINRA RULE 6490 lMPACTS REVERSE MERGERS

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567

FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the company’s entire corporate history from inception.

These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.

The public filings of companies who register with the SEC contain most of the supporting documentation required by Rule 6490.

It is no surprise that compliance with the requirements of Rule 6490 is less burdensome for companies going public using a registration statement because these companies have fewer corporate changes in their company history than companies engaging in reverse mergers. This is especially true for reverse merger issuers who undergo multiple changes of control and periods of inactivity.

The Problem with Reverse Mergers & Disclosure under Rule 6490

For companies that engage in reverse mergers as part of their going public transaction, compliance with Rule 6490's requirements can be impossible particularly when custodianship or receivership actions have been used by shell brokers to create public shells after years of inactivity. These companies may have multiple corporate actions related to prior changes of control and often have sketchy corporate histories. Some have even been hijacked through custodianship or receivership actions. In these circumstances, documents may be unavailable or if provided to FINRA, it could potentially result in FINRA referring the matter to the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

These companies are almost always plagued with incomplete or fraudulent corporate records which make it extremely difficult for the post-reverse merger company to comply with FINRA Rule 6490. As a result, these companies may never get FINRA approval of the contemplated corporate action.

Rule 6490 Disclosures

Issuers must provide a cover letter disclosing the full corporate history for the issuer itemizing all material facts including every corporate change that has occurred from inception to present day.

Triggers for Review under FINRA RULE 6490

A FINRA review will be triggered if any of the five factors set forth in Rule 6490 are thought to be present:

• FINRA believes the forms are incomplete, inaccurate or filed without the appropriate corporate authority;

• The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

• Persons involved in or related to the corporate action are the subject of pending or settled regulatory action or are under investigation by a regulatory body or are the subject of a pending criminal action related to fraud or securities law violations;

• Persons related to the corporate action are likely involved in fraudulent activities involving securities or may pose a threat to investors;

• There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the issuer’s securities.

Any company contemplating going public using a reverse merger must consider the potential impact Rule 6490 could have on its future corporate actions. Rule 6490 provides one more compelling reason why private companies seeking to go public should do so using a registration statement instead of a reverse merger.

https://bradshawlawgroup.com/reverse-mergers-a-basic-primer/

Conducting effective due diligence on the shell company is essential, as merging with a “dirty” shell (i.e., a shell whose management failed to follow proper SEC reporting procedures) could prove fatal for the private company.[13] In searching for “clean” shells, private companies should consider the shell’s number of stockholders, reporting record, and how and where it is listed.[14]
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 14 hours ago
Pink Current and all brokerages are trading it. Try to fight that with OTCM. You lose again and again.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 15 hours ago
CIVX did what was needed to get Pink Current via OTCIQ and did it perfectly just like HQGE is about to do. Assets are coming next. You haven't a clue how to understand this stuff.

I guess financial law firms, investopedia, FINRA and the SEC don't understand this stuff either. LOL!!!

CIVX is Alt Reporting. Has nothing to do with SEC regulations and the SEC
That is such a bold-face lie.

https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/6490

(3) Deficiency Determination

In circumstances where an SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action is deemed deficient, the Department may determine that it is necessary for the protection of investors, the public interest and to maintain fair and orderly markets, that documentation related to such SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action will not be processed. In instances where the Department makes such a deficiency determination, the request to process documentation related to the SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action, as applicable, will be closed, subject to paragraphs (d)(4) and (e) of this Rule. The Department shall make such deficiency determinations solely on the basis of one or more of the following factors: (1) FINRA staff reasonably believes the forms and all supporting documentation, in whole or in part, may not be complete, accurate or with proper authority; (2) the issuer is not current in its reporting requirements, if applicable, to the SEC or other regulatory authority; (3) FINRA has actual knowledge that the issuer, associated persons, officers, directors, transfer agent, legal adviser, promoters or other persons connected to the issuer or the SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action are the subject of a pending, adjudicated or settled regulatory action or investigation by a federal, state or foreign regulatory agency, or a self-regulatory organization; or a civil or criminal action related to fraud or securities laws violations; (4) a state, federal or foreign authority or self-regulatory organization has provided information to FINRA, or FINRA otherwise has actual knowledge indicating that the issuer, associated persons, officers, directors, transfer agent, legal adviser, promoters or other persons connected with the issuer or the SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action may be potentially involved in fraudulent activities related to the securities markets and/or pose a threat to public investors; and/or (5) there is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the security.

https://bradshawlawgroup.com/reverse-mergers-a-basic-primer/

Conducting effective due diligence on the shell company is essential, as merging with a “dirty” shell (i.e., a shell whose management failed to follow proper SEC reporting procedures) could prove fatal for the private company.[13] In searching for “clean” shells, private companies should consider the shell’s number of stockholders, reporting record, and how and where it is listed.[14]

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567

HOW FINRA RULE 6490 lMPACTS REVERSE MERGERS

FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the company’s entire corporate history from inception.

These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.

The public filings of companies who register with the SEC contain most of the supporting documentation required by Rule 6490.

It is no surprise that compliance with the requirements of Rule 6490 is less burdensome for companies going public using a registration statement because these companies have fewer corporate changes in their company history than companies engaging in reverse mergers. This is especially true for reverse merger issuers who undergo multiple changes of control and periods of inactivity.

The Problem with Reverse Mergers & Disclosure under Rule 6490

For companies that engage in reverse mergers as part of their going public transaction, compliance with Rule 6490's requirements can be impossible particularly when custodianship or receivership actions have been used by shell brokers to create public shells after years of inactivity. These companies may have multiple corporate actions related to prior changes of control and often have sketchy corporate histories. Some have even been hijacked through custodianship or receivership actions. In these circumstances, documents may be unavailable or if provided to FINRA, it could potentially result in FINRA referring the matter to the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

These companies are almost always plagued with incomplete or fraudulent corporate records which make it extremely difficult for the post-reverse merger company to comply with FINRA Rule 6490. As a result, these companies may never get FINRA approval of the contemplated corporate action.

Rule 6490 Disclosures

Issuers must provide a cover letter disclosing the full corporate history for the issuer itemizing all material facts including every corporate change that has occurred from inception to present day.

Triggers for Review under FINRA RULE 6490

A FINRA review will be triggered if any of the five factors set forth in Rule 6490 are thought to be present:

• FINRA believes the forms are incomplete, inaccurate or filed without the appropriate corporate authority;

• The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

• Persons involved in or related to the corporate action are the subject of pending or settled regulatory action or are under investigation by a regulatory body or are the subject of a pending criminal action related to fraud or securities law violations;

• Persons related to the corporate action are likely involved in fraudulent activities involving securities or may pose a threat to investors;

• There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the issuer’s securities.

Any company contemplating going public using a reverse merger must consider the potential impact Rule 6490 could have on its future corporate actions. Rule 6490 provides one more compelling reason why private companies seeking to go public should do so using a registration statement instead of a reverse merger.
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 15 hours ago
Doesn't apply here. CIVX is Pink Current and completely compliant with OTC Markets. No corporate actions needed. Just acquisitions coming and you about to be the biggest loser.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 15 hours ago
More proof CIVX is a dirty shell and a scam.

HOW FINRA RULE 6490 lMPACTS REVERSE MERGERS

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567

FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the company’s entire corporate history from inception.

These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.

The public filings of companies who register with the SEC contain most of the supporting documentation required by Rule 6490.

It is no surprise that compliance with the requirements of Rule 6490 is less burdensome for companies going public using a registration statement because these companies have fewer corporate changes in their company history than companies engaging in reverse mergers. This is especially true for reverse merger issuers who undergo multiple changes of control and periods of inactivity.

The Problem with Reverse Mergers & Disclosure under Rule 6490

For companies that engage in reverse mergers as part of their going public transaction, compliance with Rule 6490's requirements can be impossible particularly when custodianship or receivership actions have been used by shell brokers to create public shells after years of inactivity. These companies may have multiple corporate actions related to prior changes of control and often have sketchy corporate histories. Some have even been hijacked through custodianship or receivership actions. In these circumstances, documents may be unavailable or if provided to FINRA, it could potentially result in FINRA referring the matter to the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

These companies are almost always plagued with incomplete or fraudulent corporate records which make it extremely difficult for the post-reverse merger company to comply with FINRA Rule 6490. As a result, these companies may never get FINRA approval of the contemplated corporate action.

Rule 6490 Disclosures

Issuers must provide a cover letter disclosing the full corporate history for the issuer itemizing all material facts including every corporate change that has occurred from inception to present day.

Triggers for Review under FINRA RULE 6490

A FINRA review will be triggered if any of the five factors set forth in Rule 6490 are thought to be present:

• FINRA believes the forms are incomplete, inaccurate or filed without the appropriate corporate authority;

• The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

• Persons involved in or related to the corporate action are the subject of pending or settled regulatory action or are under investigation by a regulatory body or are the subject of a pending criminal action related to fraud or securities law violations;

• Persons related to the corporate action are likely involved in fraudulent activities involving securities or may pose a threat to investors;

• There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the issuer’s securities.

Any company contemplating going public using a reverse merger must consider the potential impact Rule 6490 could have on its future corporate actions. Rule 6490 provides one more compelling reason why private companies seeking to go public should do so using a registration statement instead of a reverse merger.

https://bradshawlawgroup.com/reverse-mergers-a-basic-primer/

Conducting effective due diligence on the shell company is essential, as merging with a “dirty” shell (i.e., a shell whose management failed to follow proper SEC reporting procedures) could prove fatal for the private company.[13] In searching for “clean” shells, private companies should consider the shell’s number of stockholders, reporting record, and how and where it is listed.[14]
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 15 hours ago
CIVX did what was needed to get Pink Current via OTCIQ and did it perfectly just like HQGE is about to do. Assets are coming next. You haven't a clue how to understand this stuff.

CIVX is Alt Reporting. Has nothing to do with SEC regulations and the SEC couldn't care less what they file to OTCIQ. So you lose again, failing to comprehend these easy requirements. You always lose and are bitter because of your failures in EVLI, SFLM. This won't be like those. You are so underwater, not much oxygen left.
😂 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 15 hours ago
There are plenty of Financials for CIVX
There are also plenty of missing financials - 13 years of them.

This is the best stock pick right now on the entire OTC Market.

Yeah, a garbage stock stuck in expert market with 13 years of missing financials, a SEC terminated registration, in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 and a restriction on its corporate actions such as a merger. Sounds wonderful.

Whales will be coming soon

Pump away pumper! LOL!!!

and it just completed filing obligations for Alternative Reporting Standard.

Big woop. If CIVX ever wants to complete a reverse merger it needs to be registered with the SEC - period. And the SEC terminated CIVX's registration. It also has 13 years of missing financials.which is violatiing FINRA Rule 6490 and a has a SEC restriction on its corporate actions.

Pink Current and will have acquisitions coming to OTCM Disclosures.

That's a lie that you started here that others are parroting and couldn't be further from the truth. But we know you have a long history of lying and distorting information for your pump and dumps.

CIVX must be registered with the SEC through a Form S-4 (and Form 10) which CIVX can't do because it had its registration with the SEC terminated, has 13 years of missing financials and is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490.



https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sec-form-s-4.asp#:~:text=Companies%20file%20this%20form%20to,remain%20compliant%20with%20financial%20regulators.

SEC Form S-4: Definition, Purpose, and Filing Requirements

By 
WILL KENTON

Updated January 22, 2024

Reviewed by 
CHARLENE RHINEHART

Part of the Series
Guide to Mergers and Acquisitions

What Is SEC Form S-4?

SEC Form S-4 is filed by a publicly traded company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). SEC Form S-4 is required to register any material information related to a merger or an acquisition. The form is also filed by companies undergoing an exchange offer, where securities are offered in place of cash. There are some key details that companies must include on the form, including their registered name and the area where they are incorporated.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

• SEC Form S-4 is filed by a publicly traded company to register any material information related to a merger, acquisition, or stock offering.

• The SEC requires that Form S-4 contain information regarding the terms of the transaction, risk factors, ratios, pro-forma financial information, and material contracts with the company being acquired.

• Companies seeking a hostile takeover of another company must file form S-4 in the interests of public disclosure.

Understanding SEC Form S-4

SEC Form S-4 is known as the Registration Statement under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933. Public or reporting companies must submit Form S-4 to the SEC whenever they are involved in a merger, acquisition, or stock exchange offer. The SEC reviews the information to ensure that the transaction is legal and able to proceed.

For merger and acquisition (M&A) transactions, the SEC requires that Form S-4 contain information regarding several factors, including the:

• Terms of the transaction

• Risk factors

• Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and other ratios

• pro-forma financial information

• Material contracts with the company being acquired

• Additional information required for reoffering by persons and parties deemed to be underwriters

• Interests of named experts and counsel

When completing SEC Form S-4, a company must include its registered name, jurisidiction of incorporation, classification code number, employer identification number (EIN), address and names of the principal executive officers, and the name and details of the service agent. Other details include the date of the proposed sale and the company's filer status.1

M&A activity happens when companies want to expend, unite efforts, move into new segments, or maximize stakeholder value. After the transaction is complete, new shares are distributed to the shareholders of both merging companies. An exchange offer usually happens in bankruptcy cases, when a firm or financial entity exchanges securities for similar ones at less rigid terms.

SEC Form S-4.

Special Considerations

All mergers require SEC Form S-4 filing. For example, here are five typical types of mergers:

• Conglomerate Mergers: These mergers involve two unrelated companies in terms of business who join to expand their current markets.

• Congeneric Mergers: In this type of merger, the companies occupy the same market. The merger creates efficiencies or economies of scale because the companies may use the same raw materials, technology, and research and development (R&D) processes.

• Market Extension Mergers: The companies that are merging may have similar products operating in different markets. The goal for all parties is to expand into new markets.

• Horizontal Mergers: The merging parties are competitors within the same industry. The goal of the merger is to expand market share.

• Vertical Mergers: Vertical mergers occur for supply chain reasons. One company is typically a supplier to the other, and the merger reduces the costs of the final product.

The Securities Exchange Act of 1933, often referred to as the truth in securities law, requires that these registration forms provide essential facts and are filed to disclose important information upon registration of a company's securities.


What Do Companies Use SEC Form S-4?

Companies must file Form S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission whenever they are about to go through a merger or acquisition transaction. It is also used to alert the financial regulator when companies tender a stock offering. For instance, they must file the form when they offer securities in place of cash. The SEC uses the form to determine the legality of the transaction.

Where Do You File SEC Form S-4?

SEC Form S-4 is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Companies file this form to register information about mergers, acquisitions, or stock offerings with the regulator.

Do All Mergers Require an SEC Form S-4 Filing?

Yes, all mergers that involve public companies require the filing of an SEC Form S-4. Types of mergers include conglomerate, congeneric, market extension, horizontal, and vertical mergers. The SEC uses the information provided to ensure that the transaction is permitted.

The Bottom Line

Public companies in the United States are required to submit regular filings to remain compliant with financial regulators. They must also submit forms whenever there are key changes in their businesses. SEC Form S-4 is completed and filed with the SEC whenever companies undergo a merger or acquisition, including a hostile takeover. It must also be used if a company makes a stock offering, such as the exchange of securities for cash.
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 16 hours ago
There are plenty of Financials for CIVX, just need to do the proper DD which you are mentally incapable of doing. This is the best stock pick right now on the entire OTC Market. Whales will be coming soon and it just completed filing obligations for Alternative Reporting Standard. I'm not sure why you are having a hard time comprehending this. Must be a foggy mind, better get a grip man. Try to get better at this stuff. Pink Current and will have acquisitions coming to OTCM Disclosures. You are so slow at finding these picks. Instead, you donate your money to dilutions like SFLM lol. This is a winner in the making.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 16 hours ago
That’s the plan 🚀
👍️ 1
Lime Time Lime Time 16 hours ago
Yep. Sell it at .01 or more once the volume starts coming in 🚀
👍️ 1
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 17 hours ago
I’m in once the updates start rolling in we are on the road to multi pennies! 🚀
👍️ 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 17 hours ago
Cheap now Wow!

Where have I heard similar investment advice/pump before?

Oh yeah, with GVSI...

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173873525

Take advantage of these prices

When you told everyone to buy above, GVSI was at .009. Now its at .0017. More horrific advice.

People who actually listened to you have suffered MASSIVE LOSSES!

Now you're pumping this CIVX garbage and telling people to buy which will lead people who actually listen to you to suffer massive losses just like with GVSI.

But that's your pump and dump MO.

No merger coming for CIVX per SEC/FINRA regulations...no matter what the CEO of a penny stock company pumps in a press release to promote his company.

CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 because of its 13 years of missing financials and CIVX never filed a Form 15 to relieve it of its SEC reporting duties which makes CIVX delinquent with the SEC. All publicly traded stocks need to conform with FINRA Rule 6490. This will prevent CIVX from getting any corporate actions such as a merger approved by SEC/FINRA.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/disclosure



No current financials for CIVX = no Form 10 approval by the SEC.

No current financials for CIVX = no SEC/FINRA approval of corporate actions.

No current financials for CIVX = no reverse merger.
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 18 hours ago
Safest investment here. Can never reverse split. Pink Current and fully Alternate Reporting compliant. This is what experienced traders put money into. Cheap now Wow!
👍️ 1
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 19 hours ago
Bashers are desperate to spread false information and assumptions yet this guys hasn’t spoken a word of this stock before last month. Bro running out of ideas
👍️ 1 🤡 1 🤥 1
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 19 hours ago
Love it CIVX to the moon🚀🚀🚀
👍️ 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 21 hours ago
Pumpers here are desperate to spread false information so as not to let the truth out.

Cavan has not verfiably denied that the company consultant Christopher Martinez - the indicted and FINRA banned ex-broker and financial advisor and consultant is not the consultant for the company.

This scammer has the same name, was a broker before getting banned by FINRA and was/is also a financial advisor and consultant.

Christopher Martinez who is CIVX's "consultant" is a shyster unless proven otherwise with documentation by Cavan.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/profile





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/individual/individual_4072355.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjA-9CQot6GAxVj4MkDHW3DDx0QFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0PGAqtt2DEJXJ5Q_H6hCAm



Why is there no direct link to an actual verifiable post from Cavan about Christopher Martinez, the company consultant not being that indicted, FINRA banned consultant?

Especially with all the lies being spread by pumpers on this board.

The so-called denial was from an email screenshot that can be easily altered.

Sorry but a so-called denial in a screenshot and not the actual post doesn't cut it.

Cavan stated:

He's been the CEO/Owner of multiple companies that he took to the OTCQB and has advised others that have gone as far as the NASDAQ.

Then why doesn't Cavan list these companies Christopher Martinez was CEO for and the companies he's consulted for so that people can do proper DD?

Penny stock CEOs often lie so that the cat doesn't get out of the bag. I've seen it many, many times...especially with all the regulatory problems this stock has.

Unless documented verifiable proof with a direct link to information about the company consultant can be verified, it should not be believed.

No merger coming for CIVX per SEC/FINRA regulations...no matter what the CEO of a penny stock company pumps in a press release to promote his company.
👍️0
Tomorrowneverknows Tomorrowneverknows 22 hours ago
Excellent post
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 22 hours ago
And CIVX must also follow not only all SEC regulations concerning mergers, it must also follow FINRA Rule 6490 which CIVX is in violation of because of its 13 years of missing financials without a Form 15.

And the fact that CIVX doesn't have a Form 10 registration statement makes CIVX's predicament even worse.

FINRA Rule 6490:

https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/6490

(3) Deficiency Determination

In circumstances where an SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action is deemed deficient, the Department may determine that it is necessary for the protection of investors, the public interest and to maintain fair and orderly markets, that documentation related to such SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action will not be processed. In instances where the Department makes such a deficiency determination, the request to process documentation related to the SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action, as applicable, will be closed, subject to paragraphs (d)(4) and (e) of this Rule. The Department shall make such deficiency determinations solely on the basis of one or more of the following factors: (1) FINRA staff reasonably believes the forms and all supporting documentation, in whole or in part, may not be complete, accurate or with proper authority; (2) the issuer is not current in its reporting requirements, if applicable, to the SEC or other regulatory authority; (3) FINRA has actual knowledge that the issuer, associated persons, officers, directors, transfer agent, legal adviser, promoters or other persons connected to the issuer or the SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action are the subject of a pending, adjudicated or settled regulatory action or investigation by a federal, state or foreign regulatory agency, or a self-regulatory organization; or a civil or criminal action related to fraud or securities laws violations; (4) a state, federal or foreign authority or self-regulatory organization has provided information to FINRA, or FINRA otherwise has actual knowledge indicating that the issuer, associated persons, officers, directors, transfer agent, legal adviser, promoters or other persons connected with the issuer or the SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action may be potentially involved in fraudulent activities related to the securities markets and/or pose a threat to public investors; and/or (5) there is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the security.

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567

HOW FINRA RULE 6490 lMPACTS REVERSE MERGERS

FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the company’s entire corporate history from inception.

These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.

The public filings of companies who register with the SEC contain most of the supporting documentation required by Rule 6490.

It is no surprise that compliance with the requirements of Rule 6490 is less burdensome for companies going public using a registration statement because these companies have fewer corporate changes in their company history than companies engaging in reverse mergers. This is especially true for reverse merger issuers who undergo multiple changes of control and periods of inactivity.

The Problem with Reverse Mergers & Disclosure under Rule 6490

For companies that engage in reverse mergers as part of their going public transaction, compliance with Rule 6490's requirements can be impossible particularly when custodianship or receivership actions have been used by shell brokers to create public shells after years of inactivity. These companies may have multiple corporate actions related to prior changes of control and often have sketchy corporate histories. Some have even been hijacked through custodianship or receivership actions. In these circumstances, documents may be unavailable or if provided to FINRA, it could potentially result in FINRA referring the matter to the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

These companies are almost always plagued with incomplete or fraudulent corporate records which make it extremely difficult for the post-reverse merger company to comply with FINRA Rule 6490. As a result, these companies may never get FINRA approval of the contemplated corporate action.

Rule 6490 Disclosures

Issuers must provide a cover letter disclosing the full corporate history for the issuer itemizing all material facts including every corporate change that has occurred from inception to present day.

Triggers for Review under FINRA RULE 6490

A FINRA review will be triggered if any of the five factors set forth in Rule 6490 are thought to be present:

• FINRA believes the forms are incomplete, inaccurate or filed without the appropriate corporate authority;

• The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

• Persons involved in or related to the corporate action are the subject of pending or settled regulatory action or are under investigation by a regulatory body or are the subject of a pending criminal action related to fraud or securities law violations;

• Persons related to the corporate action are likely involved in fraudulent activities involving securities or may pose a threat to investors;

• There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the issuer’s securities.

Any company contemplating going public using a reverse merger must consider the potential impact Rule 6490 could have on its future corporate actions. Rule 6490 provides one more compelling reason why private companies seeking to go public should do so using a registration statement instead of a reverse merger.

https://bradshawlawgroup.com/reverse-mergers-a-basic-primer/

Conducting effective due diligence on the shell company is essential, as merging with a “dirty” shell (i.e., a shell whose management failed to follow proper SEC reporting procedures) could prove fatal for the private company.[13] In searching for “clean” shells, private companies should consider the shell’s number of stockholders, reporting record, and how and where it is listed.[14]
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 22 hours ago
So, your saying the Form 15 filed on 11/19/2008, relieves Tspn/Hmbl from its financial obligations to merge on December 3, 2020??!!
Yes. For the missing financials. And I see missing financials from 2016 and 2017.

There is no way the SEC will allow 13 years of missing financials without a Form 15 filing which CIVX does not have.

Which is possible, even though it's missing financial records, Imo due to Coustodianship and being a Non Sec reporting entity.

It is NOT possible. It doesn't matter that CIVX isn't registered with the SEC.

The SEC also doesn't care about OTC Markets pink current or alternate reporting standards. It has it's own regulations that trump anything done in OTC Markets level.

CIVX is a publicly traded company and MUST follow all SEC regulations concerning mergers and CIVX doesn't qualify.

CIVX must be registered with the SEC through a Form S-4 (or Form 10) which CIVX can't do because of its 13 years of missing financials with no Form 15, making it SEC delinquent and in violation of FINRA Rule 6490.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=8880161&guid=4lO-kanF-sRSJth

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sec-form-s-4.asp#:~:text=Companies%20file%20this%20form%20to,remain%20compliant%20with%20financial%20regulators.

SEC Form S-4: Definition, Purpose, and Filing Requirements

By 
WILL KENTON

Updated January 22, 2024

Reviewed by 
CHARLENE RHINEHART

Part of the Series
Guide to Mergers and Acquisitions

What Is SEC Form S-4?

SEC Form S-4 is filed by a publicly traded company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). SEC Form S-4 is required to register any material information related to a merger or an acquisition. The form is also filed by companies undergoing an exchange offer, where securities are offered in place of cash. There are some key details that companies must include on the form, including their registered name and the area where they are incorporated.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

• SEC Form S-4 is filed by a publicly traded company to register any material information related to a merger, acquisition, or stock offering.

• The SEC requires that Form S-4 contain information regarding the terms of the transaction, risk factors, ratios, pro-forma financial information, and material contracts with the company being acquired.

• Companies seeking a hostile takeover of another company must file form S-4 in the interests of public disclosure.

Understanding SEC Form S-4

SEC Form S-4 is known as the Registration Statement under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933. Public or reporting companies must submit Form S-4 to the SEC whenever they are involved in a merger, acquisition, or stock exchange offer. The SEC reviews the information to ensure that the transaction is legal and able to proceed.

For merger and acquisition (M&A) transactions, the SEC requires that Form S-4 contain information regarding several factors, including the:

• Terms of the transaction

• Risk factors

• Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and other ratios

• pro-forma financial information

• Material contracts with the company being acquired

• Additional information required for reoffering by persons and parties deemed to be underwriters

• Interests of named experts and counsel

When completing SEC Form S-4, a company must include its registered name, jurisidiction of incorporation, classification code number, employer identification number (EIN), address and names of the principal executive officers, and the name and details of the service agent. Other details include the date of the proposed sale and the company's filer status.1

M&A activity happens when companies want to expend, unite efforts, move into new segments, or maximize stakeholder value. After the transaction is complete, new shares are distributed to the shareholders of both merging companies. An exchange offer usually happens in bankruptcy cases, when a firm or financial entity exchanges securities for similar ones at less rigid terms.

SEC Form S-4.

Special Considerations

All mergers require SEC Form S-4 filing. For example, here are five typical types of mergers:

• Conglomerate Mergers: These mergers involve two unrelated companies in terms of business who join to expand their current markets.

• Congeneric Mergers: In this type of merger, the companies occupy the same market. The merger creates efficiencies or economies of scale because the companies may use the same raw materials, technology, and research and development (R&D) processes.

• Market Extension Mergers: The companies that are merging may have similar products operating in different markets. The goal for all parties is to expand into new markets.

• Horizontal Mergers: The merging parties are competitors within the same industry. The goal of the merger is to expand market share.

• Vertical Mergers: Vertical mergers occur for supply chain reasons. One company is typically a supplier to the other, and the merger reduces the costs of the final product.

The Securities Exchange Act of 1933, often referred to as the truth in securities law, requires that these registration forms provide essential facts and are filed to disclose important information upon registration of a company's securities.


What Do Companies Use SEC Form S-4?

Companies must file Form S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission whenever they are about to go through a merger or acquisition transaction. It is also used to alert the financial regulator when companies tender a stock offering. For instance, they must file the form when they offer securities in place of cash. The SEC uses the form to determine the legality of the transaction.

Where Do You File SEC Form S-4?

SEC Form S-4 is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Companies file this form to register information about mergers, acquisitions, or stock offerings with the regulator.

Do All Mergers Require an SEC Form S-4 Filing?

Yes, all mergers that involve public companies require the filing of an SEC Form S-4. Types of mergers include conglomerate, congeneric, market extension, horizontal, and vertical mergers. The SEC uses the information provided to ensure that the transaction is permitted.

The Bottom Line

Public companies in the United States are required to submit regular filings to remain compliant with financial regulators. They must also submit forms whenever there are key changes in their businesses. SEC Form S-4 is completed and filed with the SEC whenever companies undergo a merger or acquisition[/b[, including a hostile takeover. It must also be used if a company makes a stock offering, such as the exchange of securities for cash.
👍️0
Ribo Ribo 22 hours ago
So, your saying the Form 15 filed on 11/19/2008, relieves Tspn/Hmbl from its financial obligations to merge on December 3, 2020??!!
Even though its missing financial records from 11/16/2015 to 12/31/2018, reported on 10/27/2020.

The R/S & current share price of Tspn/Hmbl is not in debate!!!

All that Civx shareholders care about is the merger!!!

Which is possible, even though it's missing financial records, Imo due to Coustodianship and being a Non Sec reporting entity.
👍️ 1 👎️ 1 🤡 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 23 hours ago
Tspn/Hmbl was able to merge going through a Coustodianship with 3yrs of missing financial records, than they uplisted to Pinkqb.
And it was reverse split into oblivion when it changed from GRDO to HMBL.

TSNP/HMBL also filed a Form 15 with the SEC on 11/19/2008 relieving it of reporting requirements for those missing financials.

Where is CIVX's Form 15?

https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1961378

It doesn't exist.

And where is HMBL's price now? 0.0004.

A lot of good the merger ultimately did for that stock.

TSNP/HMBL was just another massively hyped and very well coordinated pump and dump.

CIVX will never be able to get any corporate actions approved by the SEC/FINRA because it has 13 years of missing financials and never filed a Form 15 relieving it of its reporting obligations.

CIVX is a dead stock.
👍️0
Ribo Ribo 1 day ago
Compare Gvsi to Tspn/Hmbl to Civx.

Tspn/Hmbl was able to merge going through a Coustodianship with 3yrs of missing financial records, than they uplisted to Pinkqb.

Imo Civx, will be able merge after filing form 4.

Civx is a non Sec filing entity which means , Imo they are not required to file the missing financials,
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 1 day ago
No proof to any of this.
I've provided plenty of proof with verifiable links to investopedia articles, financial law firm articles, FINRA articles, OTC Markets data and screen captures to prove the horrible regulatory problems CIVX has.

The pumpers here have distorted and lied about me and the information I've posted and to try to bury the information so as to protect their scamming pump and dump tactics.

But I will continue to post this information and more to warn new investors not to throw their money away on this garbage stock.

Don't fall for the pump and dump being attempted by certain posters here.

.0001 coming soon for CIVX since it will never be able to get any corporate actions approved by the SEC/FINRA which means there will never be a merger.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 1 day ago
No proof to any of this. Go ahead and do another copy and paste to this.
👍️ 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 1 day ago
We still riding to .05 like GVSI did thanks for confirming

In your dreams pehaps but not in reality. CIVX will never get to .05 let alone .001 again since that only happened to GVSI because it was part of a massive coordinated online pump and dump scheme encompassing several websites that pumped the hell out of it. Even the CEO criticized the pump and dump. And I didn't confirm anything you liar.

And its is cleaner
They are both dirty shells. But CIVX is dirtier because it has 13 years of missing financials compared to GVSI's 5 years of missing financials.

And they both have the same regulatory problems.

Look at GVSI's collapse as a precursor to what will happen here since they both have the same regulatory problems.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 1 day ago
Speculation and a lot of comparisons with no proof and you are a little late to the party also. Just go on boards where you are actually invested in.
👍️ 1 💩 1 💯 1 🤡 1
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 1 day ago
We still riding to .05 like GVSI did thanks for confirming. And its is cleaner
👍️ 1 💯 1 🤡 1 🤥 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 1 day ago
You have no facts just definitions that you googled based on when you got burnt by GVSI.

Just shows how much you know.

I've never invested in GVSI. I have been critical of that stock and how George Sharp has managed it from day one when I started posting there going back three years (it's easy to verify on that board) with good reason - you liar.

The collapse that happened to GVSI will happen here with CIVX. They are both dirty shells with the same regulatoy problems.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 1 day ago
Dude that’s HQ Global
Not only for HQGE but also for CIVX or any other stock planning on doing a merger.

both stocks are in the same boat with no SEC registration, missing financials, in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 and a SEC restriction on their corporate actions.

They are BOTH regulatory nightmares.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 1 day ago
You have no facts just definitions that you googled based on when you got burnt by GVSI.
👍️ 1
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 2 days ago
Dude that’s HQ Global… you just need to take the L bro…

You learn the hard way when copy and paste and chat gpt things. Lier
👍️ 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
And these financial law firm articles about dirty shells like CIVX, missing financials (which CIVX has 13 years missing ) and how difficult it is for dirty shells like CIVX to be able to get a reverse merger approved by the SEC without a SEC registration statement - a registration statement that CIVX will never be able to get because of its SEC delnquency, continued violation of FINRA Rule 6490 and missing financials.

https://bradshawlawgroup.com/reverse-mergers-a-basic-primer/

Conducting effective due diligence on the shell company is essential, as merging with a “dirty” shell (i.e., a shell whose management failed to follow proper SEC reporting procedures) could prove fatal for the private company.[13] In searching for “clean” shells, private companies should consider the shell’s number of stockholders, reporting record, and how and where it is listed.[14]

More proof CNNA is a dirty shell and a scam.

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567

HOW FINRA RULE 6490 lMPACTS REVERSE MERGERS

FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the company’s entire corporate history from inception.

These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.

The public filings of companies who register with the SEC contain most of the supporting documentation required by Rule 6490.

It is no surprise that compliance with the requirements of Rule 6490 is less burdensome for companies going public using a registration statement because these companies have fewer corporate changes in their company history than companies engaging in reverse mergers. This is especially true for reverse merger issuers who undergo multiple changes of control and periods of inactivity.

The Problem with Reverse Mergers & Disclosure under Rule 6490

For companies that engage in reverse mergers as part of their going public transaction, compliance with Rule 6490's requirements can be impossible particularly when custodianship or receivership actions have been used by shell brokers to create public shells after years of inactivity. These companies may have multiple corporate actions related to prior changes of control and often have sketchy corporate histories. Some have even been hijacked through custodianship or receivership actions. In these circumstances, documents may be unavailable or if provided to FINRA, it could potentially result in FINRA referring the matter to the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

These companies are almost always plagued with incomplete or fraudulent corporate records which make it extremely difficult for the post-reverse merger company to comply with FINRA Rule 6490. As a result, these companies may never get FINRA approval of the contemplated corporate action.

Rule 6490 Disclosures

Issuers must provide a cover letter disclosing the full corporate history for the issuer itemizing all material facts including every corporate change that has occurred from inception to present day.

Triggers for Review under FINRA RULE 6490

A FINRA review will be triggered if any of the five factors set forth in Rule 6490 are thought to be present:

• FINRA believes the forms are incomplete, inaccurate or filed without the appropriate corporate authority;

• The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

• Persons involved in or related to the corporate action are the subject of pending or settled regulatory action or are under investigation by a regulatory body or are the subject of a pending criminal action related to fraud or securities law violations;

• Persons related to the corporate action are likely involved in fraudulent activities involving securities or may pose a threat to investors;

• There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the issuer’s securities.

Any company contemplating going public using a reverse merger must consider the potential impact Rule 6490 could have on its future corporate actions. Rule 6490 provides one more compelling reason why private companies seeking to go public should do so using a registration statement instead of a reverse merger.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
Who knows if your whole copy and paste scheme is even for the right stock.
It is for CIVX with verifiable links like this one.

CIVX must be registered with the SEC through a Form S-4 (or Form 10) which CIVX can't do because it isn't registered with the SEC and still has 13 years of missing financials.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=8880161&guid=4lO-kanF-sRSJth

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sec-form-s-4.asp#:~:text=Companies%20file%20this%20form%20to,remain%20compliant%20with%20financial%20regulators.

SEC Form S-4: Definition, Purpose, and Filing Requirements

By 
WILL KENTON

Updated January 22, 2024

Reviewed by 
CHARLENE RHINEHART

Part of the Series
Guide to Mergers and Acquisitions

What Is SEC Form S-4?

SEC Form S-4 is filed by a publicly traded company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). SEC Form S-4 is required to register any material information related to a merger or an acquisition. The form is also filed by companies undergoing an exchange offer, where securities are offered in place of cash. There are some key details that companies must include on the form, including their registered name and the area where they are incorporated.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

• SEC Form S-4 is filed by a publicly traded company to register any material information related to a merger, acquisition, or stock offering.

• The SEC requires that Form S-4 contain information regarding the terms of the transaction, risk factors, ratios, pro-forma financial information, and material contracts with the company being acquired.

• Companies seeking a hostile takeover of another company must file form S-4 in the interests of public disclosure.

Understanding SEC Form S-4

SEC Form S-4 is known as the Registration Statement under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933. Public or reporting companies must submit Form S-4 to the SEC whenever they are involved in a merger, acquisition, or stock exchange offer. The SEC reviews the information to ensure that the transaction is legal and able to proceed.

For merger and acquisition (M&A) transactions, the SEC requires that Form S-4 contain information regarding several factors, including the:

• Terms of the transaction

• Risk factors

• Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and other ratios

• pro-forma financial information

• Material contracts with the company being acquired

• Additional information required for reoffering by persons and parties deemed to be underwriters

• Interests of named experts and counsel

When completing SEC Form S-4, a company must include its registered name, jurisidiction of incorporation, classification code number, employer identification number (EIN), address and names of the principal executive officers, and the name and details of the service agent. Other details include the date of the proposed sale and the company's filer status.1

M&A activity happens when companies want to expend, unite efforts, move into new segments, or maximize stakeholder value. After the transaction is complete, new shares are distributed to the shareholders of both merging companies. An exchange offer usually happens in bankruptcy cases, when a firm or financial entity exchanges securities for similar ones at less rigid terms.

SEC Form S-4.

Special Considerations

All mergers require SEC Form S-4 filing. For example, here are five typical types of mergers:

• Conglomerate Mergers: These mergers involve two unrelated companies in terms of business who join to expand their current markets.

• Congeneric Mergers: In this type of merger, the companies occupy the same market. The merger creates efficiencies or economies of scale because the companies may use the same raw materials, technology, and research and development (R&D) processes.

• Market Extension Mergers: The companies that are merging may have similar products operating in different markets. The goal for all parties is to expand into new markets.

• Horizontal Mergers: The merging parties are competitors within the same industry. The goal of the merger is to expand market share.

• Vertical Mergers: Vertical mergers occur for supply chain reasons. One company is typically a supplier to the other, and the merger reduces the costs of the final product.

The Securities Exchange Act of 1933, often referred to as the truth in securities law, requires that these registration forms provide essential facts and are filed to disclose important information upon registration of a company's securities.


What Do Companies Use SEC Form S-4?

Companies must file Form S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission whenever they are about to go through a merger or acquisition transaction. It is also used to alert the financial regulator when companies tender a stock offering. For instance, they must file the form when they offer securities in place of cash. The SEC uses the form to determine the legality of the transaction.

Where Do You File SEC Form S-4?

SEC Form S-4 is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Companies file this form to register information about mergers, acquisitions, or stock offerings with the regulator.

Do All Mergers Require an SEC Form S-4 Filing?

Yes, all mergers that involve public companies require the filing of an SEC Form S-4. Types of mergers include conglomerate, congeneric, market extension, horizontal, and vertical mergers. The SEC uses the information provided to ensure that the transaction is permitted.

The Bottom Line

Public companies in the United States are required to submit regular filings to remain compliant with financial regulators. They must also submit forms whenever there are key changes in their businesses. SEC Form S-4 is completed and filed with the SEC whenever companies undergo a merger or acquisition[/b[, including a hostile takeover. It must also be used if a company makes a stock offering, such as the exchange of securities for cash.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 2 days ago
Who knows if your whole copy and paste scheme is even for the right stock. You’re losing it buddy.. too much screen time.
👍️ 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
hi_lo is lying about the SS.
I corrected myself immediately when I realized I mispoke about the share structure.

That mean he lies about everything else.
Only morons like yourself would believe that. That statement shows how backward your thinking is.

Everything I have said about CIVX is true (except for the minor share structure mistake I made which I corrected immediately).

This is a dead stock regardless of share structure.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
actually 4 billion AS and 3.7 OS
Yes, my mistake. I was looking at another stock - HQGE which is in the same boat as CIVX.

CIVX has 4 billion AS and 3.7 billion OS. Still bloated and itching for a reverse split if it ever manages to get the SEC to approve its corporate actions - which it won't because it has 13 years of missing financials (with no Form 15), its delinquent with the SEC, it's in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 and has a SEC restriction on its corporate actions such as a name change and merger.

There are no positives here except for the lies pumpers are spewing. If you want to believe them, then that's your financial funeral.
👍️0
Market Makers Exist Market Makers Exist 2 days ago
hi_lo is lying about the SS. That mean he lies about everything else. Remember that if you're new here.

Hi_li is a liar.
👍️ 1 🤡 1 🤥 1
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 2 days ago
You’re slow. 😂

Uh oh your copy and paste didn’t work also. lol It’s actually 4 billion AS and 3.7 OS.

Don’t do drugs kids 😬
👍️ 1 🤡 1 🤥 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 days ago
FINRA rule 6469 says it is going to run
No wonder you are followed by "0."

There's no such thing as FINRA Rule 6469 and this won't run because there will never be a merger for this regalutory nightmare.

Plus this is a bloated pig with 10 BILLION AS and 7.7 BILLION OS.
👍️0

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock