ADVFN Logo
Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customized watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, OTC Markets Small-Cap, LSE and more.
CTR Investments and Consulting Inc New (PK)

CTR Investments and Consulting Inc New (PK) (CIVX)

0.0007
0.0001
( 16.67% )
Updated: 09:50:40

Empower your portfolio: Real-time discussions and actionable trading ideas.

Key stats and details

Current Price
0.0007
Bid
0.0006
Ask
0.0007
Volume
10,000
0.0007 Day's Range 0.0007
0.0001 52 Week Range 0.0012
Previous Close
0.0006
Open
0.0007
Last Trade
10000
@
0.0007
Last Trade Time
09:50:40
Average Volume (3m)
5,344,289
Financial Volume
$ 7
VWAP
0.0007

CIVX Latest News

No news to show yet.
PeriodChangeChange %OpenHighLowAvg. Daily VolVWAP
10.0002400.00050.00070.000514393770.0005419CS
4000.00070.00080.000526352410.00062657CS
120.0004133.3333333330.00030.00120.000253442890.00082928CS
260.00066000.00010.00120.000144880560.00067111CS
520.0003750.00040.00120.000139195540.00051701CS
156-0.0058-89.23076923080.00650.01360.000185753670.00352248CS
2600.000699699001.0E-60.01361.0E-6108884860.00305051CS

Movers

View all
  • Most Active
  • % Gainers
  • % Losers
SymbolPriceVol.
NUZENuZee Inc
$ 2.97
(188.35%)
74.97M
DRMADermata Therapeutics Inc
$ 2.60
(100.00%)
52.33M
PIRSPieris Pharmaceuticals Inc
$ 13.9215
(74.45%)
4.44M
WORXSCWorx Corporation
$ 2.0378
(74.17%)
5.38M
QXOQXO Inc
$ 124.50
(57.00%)
116.2k
NXTTNext Technology Holding Inc
$ 2.25
(-61.34%)
538.99k
CJETChijet Motor Company Inc
$ 3.01
(-40.75%)
256.44k
NUWENewellis Inc
$ 2.55
(-38.55%)
840.25k
CONNConns Inc
$ 0.32
(-36.88%)
2.86M
ATPCAgape ATP Corporation
$ 0.1424
(-33.77%)
5.16M
SLNASelina Hospitality PLC
$ 0.0395
(51.92%)
842.84M
SGMOSangamo Therapeutics Inc
$ 0.5511
(37.33%)
189.39M
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
$ 117.485
(-4.16%)
105.56M
TSLATesla Inc
$ 220.9901
(-10.31%)
96.16M
SQQQProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
$ 8.835
(8.01%)
95.48M

CIVX Discussion

View Posts
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 14 minutes ago
Pumpers are paid to promote a stock idiot
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 hours ago
lol it’s funny you think I’m a pumper

Yeah, not pumping at all:

We going to mooooooon.

CIVX is a regulatory disaster and pumpers here are full of lies at every turn.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 2 hours ago
Bashers coming in to have their short position succeed while doing harm to small account investors just trying to make money.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 2 hours ago
lol it’s funny you think I’m a pumper
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 2 hours ago
What I'm posting applies to all publicly traded companies including OTC.

More lies being pushed by pumpers.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 3 hours ago
You might be knowledgeable on searching rules for Nasdaq companies but you obviously aren’t for OTC
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 3 hours ago
they can do a private merge.
These are the type of lies pumpers here are trying to push on the less knowledgeable.

A publicly traded company can't do a "private merge."

Talk about delusional.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 4 hours ago
Bashers are delusional they think the OTC is the big boards
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 5 hours ago
Shell companies or companies that were once a shell company must register with the SEC.

CIVX is (or once was) a shell company.



https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2020/form-10-registration-statement/#:~:text=Both%20public%20and%20private%20companies,subject%20to%20SEC%20reporting%20requirements.

Both public and private companies can register a class of securities on Form 10. Form 10 is also used by shell purveyors to create inventory for reverse merger transactions that take a company from private to public company status. These shells are subject to SEC reporting requirements.

Q. If a non-reporting company was a shell company twenty years ago, is it required to file a Form 10 to cure its shell status for purposes of its shareholders having the ability to rely upon Rule 144’s safe harbor?

A. Yes, if a non-reporting entity was a shell company during any time in its history, it must either file a Form 10 registration statement or a registration statement on Form S-1 in order for its shareholders to rely upon Rule 144.

So what a certain pumper keeps spouting about CIVX being "fully Alternate Reporting Standard Compliant" is a crock. CIVX must register with the SEC as a company with a shell history and it can't because there's a huge gap of missing financials from 2008 - 2020 which means CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 which will prevent CIVX from getting SEC registered and have any corporate actions such as a merger approved by SEC/FINRA.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/disclosure



More proof CIVX is a dirty shell and a scam.

Be careful believing pumpers on this board. Their whole aim is to pump and lie and then dump on the less knowledgeable and leave them holding the bag when the price collapses.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 5 hours ago
Pumpers here are desperate to spread false information so as not to let the truth out.

Cavan has not verfiably denied that the company consultant Christopher Martinez - the indicted and FINRA banned ex-broker and financial advisor and consultant is not the consultant for the company.

This scammer has the same name, was a broker before getting banned by FINRA and was/is also a financial advisor and consultant.

Christopher Martinez who is CIVX's "consultant," unless verifiably proven that he's not the same individual is a shyster.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/profile





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/individual/individual_4072355.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjA-9CQot6GAxVj4MkDHW3DDx0QFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0PGAqtt2DEJXJ5Q_H6hCAm



Why is there no direct link to an actual verifiable post from Cavan about Christopher Martinez, the company consultant not being that indicted, FINRA banned consultant?

Especially with all the lies being spread by pumpers on this board.

Just a denial from a screenshot from a personal email that can be easily altered doesn't cut it.

He's been the CEO/Owner of multiple companies that he took to the OTCQB and has advised others that have gone as far as the NASDAQ.

Then why doesn't Cavan list these companies so that people can do proper DD?

Penny stock CEOs often lie so that the cat doesn't get out of the bag. I've seen it many, many times...especially with all the regulatory problems this stock has.

Unless documented verifiable proof with a direct link to information about the company consultant can be verified, it should not be believed.

No merger coming for CIVX per SEC/FINRA regulations...no matter what the CEO of a penny stock company pumps in a press release to promote his company.

CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 because of its 13 years of missing financials and all publicly traded stocks need to conform with FINRA Rule 6490.

There is a huge gap of missing financials from 2008 - 2020 which means CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 which will prevent CIVX from getting any corporate actions such as a merger approved by SEC/FINRA. The same thing caused GVSI's catastrophic collapse. Look at that ticker as a good example of what will happen here.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/disclosure



More proof CIVX is a dirty shell and a scam.

HOW FINRA RULE 6490 lMPACTS REVERSE MERGERS

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567

FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the company’s entire corporate history from inception.

These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.

The public filings of companies who register with the SEC contain most of the supporting documentation required by Rule 6490.

It is no surprise that compliance with the requirements of Rule 6490 is less burdensome for companies going public using a registration statement because these companies have fewer corporate changes in their company history than companies engaging in reverse mergers. This is especially true for reverse merger issuers who undergo multiple changes of control and periods of inactivity.

The Problem with Reverse Mergers & Disclosure under Rule 6490

For companies that engage in reverse mergers as part of their going public transaction, compliance with Rule 6490's requirements can be impossible particularly when custodianship or receivership actions have been used by shell brokers to create public shells after years of inactivity. These companies may have multiple corporate actions related to prior changes of control and often have sketchy corporate histories. Some have even been hijacked through custodianship or receivership actions. In these circumstances, documents may be unavailable or if provided to FINRA, it could potentially result in FINRA referring the matter to the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

These companies are almost always plagued with incomplete or fraudulent corporate records which make it extremely difficult for the post-reverse merger company to comply with FINRA Rule 6490. As a result, these companies may never get FINRA approval of the contemplated corporate action.

Rule 6490 Disclosures

Issuers must provide a cover letter disclosing the full corporate history for the issuer itemizing all material facts including every corporate change that has occurred from inception to present day.

Triggers for Review under FINRA RULE 6490

A FINRA review will be triggered if any of the five factors set forth in Rule 6490 are thought to be present:

• FINRA believes the forms are incomplete, inaccurate or filed without the appropriate corporate authority;

• The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

• Persons involved in or related to the corporate action are the subject of pending or settled regulatory action or are under investigation by a regulatory body or are the subject of a pending criminal action related to fraud or securities law violations;

• Persons related to the corporate action are likely involved in fraudulent activities involving securities or may pose a threat to investors;

• There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the issuer’s securities.

Any company contemplating going public using a reverse merger must consider the potential impact Rule 6490 could have on its future corporate actions. Rule 6490 provides one more compelling reason why private companies seeking to go public should do so using a registration statement instead of a reverse merger.

https://bradshawlawgroup.com/reverse-mergers-a-basic-primer/

Conducting effective due diligence on the shell company is essential, as merging with a “dirty” shell (i.e., a shell whose management failed to follow proper SEC reporting procedures) could prove fatal for the private company.[13] In searching for “clean” shells, private companies should consider the shell’s number of stockholders, reporting record, and how and where it is listed.[14]
👍️0
Tomorrowneverknows Tomorrowneverknows 2 days ago
its seems we have a little ask blocker at .0007 slowly getting chewed thru
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 2 days ago
We are patiently ready!
👍️ 1
$treet Trader $treet Trader 2 days ago
CIVX .0007 show me dat run!
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 5 days ago
Super thin, can move up easily 🚀
👍️ 1
Backstabbed Backstabbed 5 days ago
Boooooom!
💥 1
$treet Trader $treet Trader 5 days ago
CIVX .0006 x .0007 , like to see it leave trips next week and run with updates
👍️0
$treet Trader $treet Trader 5 days ago
.
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 7 days ago
Bigtime catalysts coming here end of year and into 2025 CIVX, fight to bring this current and the best is yet to come
👎️ 1 🤥 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 7 days ago
they can do a private merge.
Just because you, an anonymous poster with no verifiable documentation says that, it doesn't make it true...it makes it just your opinion - your mistaken opinion.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 7 days ago
Few opportunities like this rn
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 7 days ago
🫡
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 7 days ago
Dude they aren’t going to the big boards yet they can do a private merge. Quit feeding lies on a fresh company with a new ceo you don’t know what they are doing.
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 7 days ago
Huge catalysts coming here. Only the expert traders know this 😀 🚀
👎️ 1 🤥 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 7 days ago
It’s not currently a shell.

It doesn't matter what a company designates itself in an unaudited financial report. It's what the SEC designates the company, and the SEC has designated CIVX as a shell company.

Plus, even if it isn't currently a shell company, it was a shell at one point in its history so it has to file a Form 10 registration statement by filing a Form 10 registration statement or a registration statement on Form S-1.

https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2020/form-10-registration-statement/#:~:text=Both%20public%20and%20private%20companies,subject%20to%20SEC%20reporting%20requirements.

Q. If a non-reporting company was a shell company twenty years ago, is it required to file a Form 10 to cure its shell status for purposes of its shareholders having the ability to rely upon Rule 144’s safe harbor?

A. Yes, if a non-reporting entity was a shell company during any time in its history, it must either file a Form 10 registration statement or a registration statement on Form S-1 in order for its shareholders to rely upon Rule 144.

...and CIVX is not registered with the SEC and its missing financials will prevent it from getting its registration statement processed by the SEC/FINRA because it violates FINRA Rule 6490.

Nice try at twisting information and deceiving investors. It didn't work.
👍️0
JMoneyHoops JMoneyHoops 7 days ago
Thanks you as well
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 7 days ago
Solid plays 👍 hope you bank on all of them.
👍️0
JMoneyHoops JMoneyHoops 7 days ago
Top 5 Summer OTC Plays:
1. $CNNA (Stem Cell Therapy)
2. $HQGE (Sony Pictures Connection)
3. $CIVX (Clean Shell, No Convertible Notes)
4. $NGMC (Same CEO who made $MAYX go from 0.08 - 7.00)
5. $BCAP (Custo Play with the Potential Custodian being heavily invested (Jake Noch)— JMoney💸 (@jmoney_hoops) July 17, 2024
💯 1
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 7 days ago
We going to mooooooon.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 7 days ago
It’s not currently a shell. Quit spreading lies
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 7 days ago
https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2020/form-10-registration-statement/#:~:text=Both%20public%20and%20private%20companies,subject%20to%20SEC%20reporting%20requirements.

Both public and private companies can register a class of securities on Form 10. Form 10 is also used by shell purveyors to create inventory for reverse merger transactions that take a company from private to public company status. These shells are subject to SEC reporting requirements.
Q. If a non-reporting company was a shell company twenty years ago, is it required to file a Form 10 to cure its shell status for purposes of its shareholders having the ability to rely upon Rule 144’s safe harbor?

A. Yes, if a non-reporting entity was a shell company during any time in its history, it must either file a Form 10 registration statement or a registration statement on Form S-1 in order for its shareholders to rely upon Rule 144.

CIVX is a shell company.



But some pumpers here are intentionally manipulating information and investors.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 7 days ago
At the rate this junk is losing value, this will be back to .0002 in no time.

It's already lost more than half its value in less than two months.
👍️0
Lime Time Lime Time 7 days ago
Doesn't need a Form 10, Is fully Alternate Reporting Standard Compliant. Don't listen to the idiot that is misinformed here. The only thing we need is the assets/mergers coming via social media. Only 2B Float, oh my, loading up at these prices 🚀
👍️ 1 👎️ 1 🤥 1
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 7 days ago
Exactamundo!!!! He's not listed!!!

Christopher Martinez - CNNA's "consultant" is neither a lawyer nor an accountant - that is what the webpage you referenced lists. So that's the reason he is not listed.

That was a very amateurish attempt to obfuscate and confuse people here. A typical pumper tactic.

Christopher Martinez who is CIVX's "consultant," unless verifiably proven that he's not the same individual is a shyster.

This is directly from FINRA and OTC Markets.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/profile





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/individual/individual_4072355.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjA-9CQot6GAxVj4MkDHW3DDx0QFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0PGAqtt2DEJXJ5Q_H6hCAm

👍️0
Ribo Ribo 7 days ago
Exactamundo!!!! He's not listed!!!
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 7 days ago
Don’t see a Martinez
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 7 days ago
None of your opinions have been verified by the company itself
Why would they if it's a scam?
👍️0
Ribo Ribo 7 days ago
Prohibited Service Providers
https://www.otcmarkets.com/learn/prohibited-service-providers
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 7 days ago
Bashers are desperate here to get validation in their life.
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 7 days ago
Quit spreading your false opinions just because you got burned before by other stocks. None of your opinions have been verified by the company itself
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 1 week ago
Pumpers here are desperate to spread false information so as not to let the truth out.

Cavan has not verfiably denied that the company consultant Christopher Martinez - the indicted and FINRA banned ex-broker and financial advisor and consultant is not the consultant for the company.

This scammer has the same name, was a broker before getting banned by FINRA and was/is also a financial advisor and consultant.

Christopher Martinez who is CIVX's "consultant," unless verifiably proven that he's not the same individual is a shyster.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/profile





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/individual/individual_4072355.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjA-9CQot6GAxVj4MkDHW3DDx0QFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0PGAqtt2DEJXJ5Q_H6hCAm



Why is there no direct link to an actual verifiable post from Cavan about Christopher Martinez, the company consultant not being that indicted, FINRA banned consultant?

Especially with all the lies being spread by pumpers on this board.

Just a denial from a screenshot from a personal email that can be easily altered doesn't cut it.

He's been the CEO/Owner of multiple companies that he took to the OTCQB and has advised others that have gone as far as the NASDAQ.

Then why doesn't Cavan list these companies so that people can do proper DD?

Penny stock CEOs often lie so that the cat doesn't get out of the bag. I've seen it many, many times...especially with all the regulatory problems this stock has.

Unless documented verifiable proof with a direct link to information about the company consultant can be verified, it should not be believed.
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 1 week ago
This stock will never get a Form 10 approved. Period!
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 1 week ago
“That is not true. Issuing new shares is not considered a corporate action by FINRA.

https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/corporate-actions-public-companies-what-you-should-know”

You are wrong you clown. It certainly is.

“Additionally, FINRA’s Rule 6490 details that corporate actions also encompass “any issuance or change to a symbol or name, mergers, acquisitions, dissolutions or other company control transactions”

https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/6490
👍️0
Hi_Lo Hi_Lo 1 week ago
Issuing new shares is considered a corporate action. CIVX issued 80M new shares in 2022/2023.

That is not true. Issuing new shares is not considered a corporate action by FINRA.

https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/corporate-actions-public-companies-what-you-should-know
👍️0
JMoneyHoops JMoneyHoops 1 week ago
Once they’re cleared out should move to dubs easily again
👍️0
Backstabbed Backstabbed 1 week ago
There is only one loser sitting at $0.0006 - the rest of the MMs are above $0.001
👍️0
tradedays1224 tradedays1224 1 week ago
It’ll come hard very thin 👀
👍️0
Tomuggly313 Tomuggly313 1 week ago
Big run coming imo
👍️0
LCJR LCJR 2 weeks ago
What do you expect him to publish that isn’t already public knowledge? He said they’re looking for a candidate, which takes time and resources. It’s a very tedious task, with tons of research and interviews on the perspective candidates they find that might be the one. I hope they already have a few in mind so the process is quicker, but who knows?

LCJR
👍️ 1
koolmc koolmc 2 weeks ago
he just said this per last pr "INVESTORS* PLEASE Refrain from contacting the Company regarding Merger. All Information will be made Public via Company Press Releases. Thank You." So he ain't gonna say anything till they get a candidate
👍️ 2
Backstabbed Backstabbed 2 weeks ago
Good. I will continue to accumulate at these prices.
👍️0

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock