Item 1. — Financial Statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2017
(Unaudited)
1.
Description of Company and Basis of Presentation
CytRx Corporation ("we," "us," "our," CytRx" or the "company") is a biopharmaceutical research and development company specializing in oncology. Our focus is on the discovery, research and clinical development of novel anti-cancer drug candidates that employ novel linker technologies to enhance the accumulation and release of cytotoxic anti-cancer agents at the tumor. CytRx has an active drug discovery and research operation at our laboratory facilities in Freiburg, Germany.
The LADR™ (Linker Activated Drug Release) technology platform is a discovery engine combining CytRx's expertise in linker chemistry and albumin biology to create a pipeline of anti-cancer molecules that will avoid unacceptable systemic toxicity while delivering highly potent agents directly to the tumor. We have created a "toolbox" of linker technologies that have the ability to significantly increase the therapeutic index of ultra-high potency drugs (10-1,000 times more potent than traditional chemotherapies) by controlling the release of the drug payloads and improving drug-like properties. After infusion, these ultra-high potency drug conjugates bind to circulating albumin for transport of the drug to the tumor. Subsequently, due to specific conditions within the tumor, the linkers are cleaved and release the anti-cancer drug payload.
Our current efforts are focused on two classes of ultra-high potency drug conjugates. Our strategy across these programs is to generate additional pre-clinical data that will allow us to make informed decisions regarding the selection of one or both programs for moving into human clinical trials either independently or on a partnered basis.
During 2017, CytRx's discovery laboratory synthesized and tested over 75 rationally designed drug conjugates with highly potent cytotoxic payloads, and two distinct classes of compounds have been created. To date, four lead candidates have been selected based on
in vitro
and animal preclinical studies, stability, and manufacturing feasibility. Additional animal efficacy and toxicology testing of these lead candidates is underway.
On July 27, 2017, CytRx entered into an exclusive worldwide license with NantCell, Inc. ("NantCell"), granting them rights to develop, manufacture and commercialize aldoxorubicin in all indications. As part of the license, NantCell made a strategic investment of $13 million in CytRx common stock at $6.60 per share, a premium of 92% to the market price on that date. CytRx also issued NantCell a warrant to purchase up to 0.5 million shares of common stock at $6.60 over the next 18 months. CytRx is entitled to receive up to $343 million in fees contingent upon certain regulatory approvals and commercial milestones. CytRx is entitled to receive ascending double-digit royalties for net sales for soft tissue sarcomas and mid to high single digit royalties for other indications.
Aldoxorubicin is a conjugate of the commonly prescribed chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin that binds to circulating albumin in the bloodstream and is believed to concentrate the drug at the site of the tumor. Aldoxorubicin, our lead clinical candidate, has been tested in over 600 patients with various types of cancer. Specifically, it is comprised of (6-maleimidocaproyl) hydrazine, an acid-sensitive molecule that is conjugated to doxorubicin. The initial indication for aldoxorubicin is for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS). In March 2017 CytRx met with the FDA to discuss a regulatory pathway for a New Drug Application (NDA) for aldoxorubicin in STS.
Aldoxorubicin has received Orphan Drug Designation (ODD) by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of STS. ODD provides several benefits including seven years of market exclusivity after approval, certain R&D related tax credits, and protocol assistance by the FDA. European regulators also granted aldoxorubicin Orphan designation for STS, which confers ten years of market exclusivity among other benefits.
Currently, our only research and development activities are conducted by Freiburg, Germany, our laboratory facilities. For this reason and others, our operating expenses are expected to be significantly lower in the near future. Therefore, period to period comparisons should not be relied upon as predictive of the results in future periods.
The accompanying condensed financial statements at September 30, 2017 and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, are unaudited, but include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring entries, that management believes to be necessary for a fair presentation of the periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Balance sheet amounts as of December 31, 2016 have been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date.
The financial statements included herein have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited financial statements contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Effective November 1, 2017, the Company completed a 1-for-6 reverse stock split of the Company's outstanding shares of common and preferred stock, reduced its authorized shares of both common and preferred stock by one-sixth; no change was made to the per-share par value of the common stock. All share and per share amounts in the accompanying financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split as if it had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented.
2.
Foreign Currency Remeasurement
The U.S. dollar has been determined to be the functional currency for the net assets of our German laboratory facility. The transactions are recorded in the local currencies and are remeasured at each reporting date using the historical rates for nonmonetary assets and liabilities and current exchange rates for monetary assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. Exchange gains and losses from the remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities are recognized in other income (loss). The Company recognized a loss of approximately $2,000 and $15,000, respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and a loss of approximately $6,000 and $500, respectively, for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The Company does not engage in currency hedging transactions.
3.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB"), issued Accounting Standards Update ASU No. 2017-09,
Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) – Scope of Modification Accounting
, or ASU 2017-09, which clarifies that a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award should be accounted for as a modification only if the fair value, vesting conditions or classification (as equity or liability) of the award changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. Modification of a share-based payment award may result in the Company recognizing additional compensation expense. ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company generally has not modified, and does not expect to frequently modify, the fair value, vesting conditions or classification of its share-based payment awards. As a result, for reporting periods following the adoption of ASU 2017-09, the Company generally does not expect this guidance to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, if and when modifications occur, their effect could be material to the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows (see Note 8,
Stock Based Compensation
).
In January 2017, the FASB issued updated guidance to clarify the definition of a business within the context of business combinations. The updated guidance requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This updated guidance is expected to reduce the number of transactions that need to be further evaluated as business combinations. If further evaluation is necessary, the updated guidance will require that a business set include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output. The updated guidance will remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and is to be applied on a prospective basis. The adoption of this Standard will not have a material impact to the Company's financial position or its results of operations.
In January 2017, the FASB issued updated guidance which eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 is the process of measuring a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The new guidance requires entities to measure a goodwill impairment loss as the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, limited to the carrying amount of goodwill. The FASB also eliminated the requirements for entities that have reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts to perform a qualitative assessment for the goodwill impairment test. Instead, those entities would be required to disclose the amount of goodwill allocated to each reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount. The new guidance is effective for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect adoption of this guidance to be material.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-09,
Compensation—Stock Compensation
("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 includes several areas of simplification to stock compensation including simplifications to the accounting for income taxes, classification of excess tax benefits on the Statement of Cash Flows and forfeitures. ASU 2016-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We adopted this Standard on January 1, 2017. The adoption of this Standard did not have a material impact to the Company's financial position or its results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02,
Leases
("ASU 2016-02"). ASU 2016-02 allows the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. The classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases are substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases in the previous leases guidance. The Update 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and early adoption is permitted. We are still evaluating the effect of this update.
In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-01,
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
("ASU 2016-01"). ASU 2016-01 eliminates the requirement to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The standard also clarifies the need to evaluate a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with our other deferred tax assets. The update 2016-01 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (Topic 606) "
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
." Topic 606 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605, "
Revenue Recognition
", and requires entities to recognize revenue when they transfer control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services.
We are currently assessing the method of adoption and the impact this new guidance will have on our financial statements. We expect to adopt these standards using the modified retrospective method. The timing of revenue recognition for variable consideration under our licensing and collaboration agreements may be different as a result of this new guidance. We are reviewing our licensing agreement for variable consideration, and if any such consideration exists, whether it should be estimated and recognized earlier than under the current revenue guidance
.
4.
Term Loan
On February 5, 2016, we entered into a loan and security agreement with
Hercules Capital, Inc. (formerly known as Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc.) ("HC"),
as administrative agent and lender, and Hercules Technology III, L.P., as lender ("Hercules"), pursuant to which the lenders made term loans to us on February 8, 2016 in the aggregate principal amount of $25 million (the "Term Loans").
The Term Loans bear interest at the daily variable rate per annum equal to 6.0% plus the prime rate, or 10.25%, whichever is greater. We are required to make interest-only payments on the Term Loans through February 28, 2017, and beginning on March 1, 2017 blended equal monthly installments of principal amortization and accrued interest until the maturity date of the Term Loans on February 1, 2020. Under the terms of the loan, we are required to maintain a minimum cash balance equal to the greater of (i) $10 million or (ii) forward three months projected cash burn. As security under our obligations, we issued to the lenders warrants to purchase a total of 105,691 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $12.30. These warrants are classified as equity warrants with a fair value of $633,749. All outstanding principal and accrued interest on the term loans will be due and payable in full on the maturity date of February 1, 2020.
On July 28, 2017, we entered into a First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement with Hercules to amend our existing long-term loan facility (the "Loan Agreement"). The amendment provides for our payment, on July 28, 2017, of $5.0 million in outstanding principal and unpaid interest due under the Loan Agreement, plus a $100,000 prepayment charge, and for our repayment, on or prior to September 30, 2017, of an additional $5.0 million outstanding principal and unpaid interest due under the Loan Agreement, plus a second $100,000 prepayment charge. Both those additional payments were made this quarter. We also agreed to an updated schedule of monthly payments and a new maturity date of August 1, 2018. Pursuant to the amendment, a portion of the warrants (representing 80% of the total number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants) was amended to change the exercise price of that portion of the warrants from $12.30 per share to $4.62 per share, which was calculated based upon the 30-day volume-weighted average price of our common stock over the 30-day period beginning 15 days before the July 28, 2017 announcement of the NantCell license transaction. We evaluated the amended debt agreement under ASC 470 and determined it to be a modification and that in accordance with accounting guidance for debt modifications, the incremental fair value of the repriced warrants of $77,000 and the $200,000 fee paid to the lender was recorded as additional loan discount to be recognized using the interest method over the remaining life of the loan. The payment schedule was changed and the future principal payments as of September 30, 2017 are $1.0 million for the remainder of 2017 and $10.0 million in 2018.
As security for our obligations under the loan and securities agreement, we granted HC, as administrative agent, a security interest in substantially all of our existing and after-acquired assets except for our intellectual property and certain other excluded assets. The loan and security agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants.
|
|
September 30, 2017
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Term Loan Principal – Current
|
|
$
|
10,999,522
|
|
|
$
|
6,214,057
|
|
End Fee Payable
|
|
|
1,771,250
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance Cost/Loan Discount – Current
|
|
|
(1,718,067
|
)
|
|
|
(732,401
|
)
|
Term Loan, Net – Current
|
|
$
|
11,052,705
|
|
|
$
|
5,481,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Loan Principal
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
18,785,943
|
|
End Fee Payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,771,250
|
|
Long Term Loan Discount/Issuance Cost
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,072,683
|
)
|
Long Term Loan, Net
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
18,484,510
|
|
The interest expense on the loan for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 was $828,120 and $2,999,230, respectively, as compared to $781,038 and $1,939,186 for comparative 2016 periods.
5.
Deferred Revenue
We primarily generate revenue through licensing arrangements of our intellectual property. The Company recognizes revenue when amounts are realized or realizable and earned. Revenue is considered realizable and earned when the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the price is fixed or determinable; and (4) collection of the amounts due are reasonably assured. Amounts received prior to satisfying the revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue in the Company's balance sheets. Amounts expected to be recognized as revenue within the 12 months following the balance sheet date are classified as current liabilities.
Deferred revenue represents amounts received prior to revenue recognition.
On October 3, 2017, we entered into a Reimbursement Agreement with NantCell, Inc. whereby we agreed to reimburse them for payment obligations under certain of the contracts under the Nantcell licensing agreement up to a maximum of $4.2 million plus one half of any amounts in excess thereof.
Once all conditions of the agreement are met and no contingencies remain outstanding, the revenue
will be
recognized as
licensing
fee revenue. We recognized $6
.9 million
of
deferred revenue from the NantCell licensing agreement
and anticipate recording this as revenues in 2018, once the Company's cost reimbursement obligations are met
6.
Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Common Share
Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Common share equivalents (which consist of options and warrants) are excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per common share where the effect would be anti-dilutive. Common share equivalents that could potentially dilute net loss per share in the future, and which were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, totaled 6.5 million shares for each of the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017, and 7.3 million shares for each of the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016.
7.
Warrant Liabilities
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis include warrant liabilities resulting from our equity financings. In accordance with ASC 815-40
, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity's Own Equity
("ASC 815-40"), the warrant liabilities are recorded at fair value until they are completely settled. The warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes method, using assumptions consistent with the Company's application of ASC 505-50,
Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees
("ASC 505-50"). The gain or loss resulting from the change in fair value is shown on the Condensed Statements of Operations as gain (loss) on warrant derivative liability. We recognized a gain of $3.8 million and $0.2 million for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and a loss of $0.6 million and a gain of $0.9 million for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The following reflects the weighted-average assumptions for each of the nine-month periods indicated:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.31
|
%
|
|
|
0.52
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected lives
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
120.8
|
%
|
|
|
131.3
|
%
|
Warrants classified as liabilities (in shares)
|
|
|
2,834,246
|
|
|
|
4,761,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our computation of expected volatility is based on the historical daily volatility of our publicly traded stock. The dividend yield assumption of zero is based upon the fact that we have never paid cash dividends and presently have no intention to do so. The risk-free interest rate used for each warrant classified as a derivative is equal to the U.S. Treasury rates in effect at September 30 of each year presented. The expected lives are based on the remaining contractual lives of the related warrants at the valuation date.
On July 19, 2017, 1,056,692 warrants expired.
8
.
Stock Based Compensation
We have a 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which expired on August 6, 2010. As of September 30, 2017, there were approximately 0.1 million shares subject to outstanding stock options under this plan. No further shares are available for future grant under this plan.
We also have a 2008 Stock Incentive Plan. As of September 30, 2017, there were 2.5 million shares subject to outstanding stock options and 0.4 million shares outstanding related to restricted stock grants options and 2.0 million shares available for future grant under this plan.
We follow ASC 718,
Compensation-Stock Compensation,
which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees.
For stock options and stock warrants paid in consideration of services rendered by non-employees, we recognize compensation expense in accordance with the requirements of ASC 505-50.
Non-employee option grants that do not vest immediately upon grant are recorded as an expense over the vesting period. At the end of each financial reporting period, the value of these options, as calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, is determined, and compensation expense recognized or recovered during the period is adjusted accordingly. As a result, the amount of the future compensation expense is subject to adjustment until the common stock options are fully vested.
The following table sets forth the total stock-based compensation expense resulting from stock options and warrants included in our Condensed Statements of Operations:
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Research and development — employee
|
|
$
|
(124,405
|
)
|
|
$
|
455,341
|
|
|
$
|
507,211
|
|
|
$
|
1,443,347
|
|
General and administrative — employee
|
|
|
479,330
|
|
|
|
586,315
|
|
|
|
1,348,815
|
|
|
|
3,742,733
|
|
Total employee stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
354,925
|
|
|
$
|
1,041,656
|
|
|
$
|
1,856,026
|
|
|
$
|
5,186,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development — non-employee
|
|
$
|
11,600
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
11,600
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
General and administrative — non-employee
|
|
|
32,581
|
|
|
|
(5,938
|
)
|
|
|
97,818
|
|
|
|
214,524
|
|
Total non-employee stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
44,181
|
|
|
$
|
(5,938
|
)
|
|
$
|
109,418
|
|
|
$
|
214,524
|
|
During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017, we granted stock options to purchase 35,000 shares of our common stock at an average weighted exercise price of $3.96. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, we granted stock options to purchase 79,167 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 83,334 shares of our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $11.34. In the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, we amended the terms of stock options of a former executive in respect of a Retirement Agreement, resulting in a one-time expense of approximately $1.9 million. The fair value of the stock options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, based on the following assumptions:
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
90.7
|
%
|
|
|
74.9
|
%
|
Expected lives (years)
|
|
6 to 10
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our computation of expected volatility is based on the historical daily volatility of our publicly traded stock. We use historical information to compute expected lives. In the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017, the contractual term of the options granted was ten years. The dividend yield assumption of zero is based upon the fact we have never paid cash dividends and presently have no intention to do so. The risk-free interest rate used for each grant and issuance is equal to the U.S. Treasury rates in effect at the time of the grant and issuance for instruments with a similar expected life. Based on historical experience, for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016, we estimated annualized forfeiture rates of 10% for options granted to our employees, 2% for options granted to senior management and 0% for options granted to directors and non-employees and for warrants issued to non-employees Compensation costs will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures. We will record additional expense if the actual forfeitures are lower than estimated and will record a recovery of prior expense if the actual forfeiture rates are higher than estimated. On January 1, 2017, we adopted ASU 2016-09 and made a policy election to recognize forfeitures as they occur. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact to the Company's financial condition or results of operations. No amounts relating to stock-based compensation have been capitalized.
As of September 30, 2017, there remained approximately $1.7 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options granted to current and former employees, directors, to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 0.89 years. Presented below is our stock option activity:
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
Number of Options
(Employees)
|
|
|
Number of Options
(Non-Employees)
|
|
|
Total Number of
Options
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2017
|
|
|
2,813,295
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
2,913,295
|
|
|
$
|
14.22
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
31,667
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
35,001
|
|
|
$
|
3.96
|
|
Exercised, Forfeited or Expired
|
|
|
(412,645
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(412,645
|
)
|
|
$
|
12.90
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
2,432,317
|
|
|
|
103,334
|
|
|
|
2,535,651
|
|
|
$
|
14.28
|
|
Options exercisable at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
1,956,450
|
|
|
|
103,334
|
|
|
|
2,059,784
|
|
|
$
|
16.02
|
|
The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding stock options under our plans at September 30, 2017:
Range of Exercise
Prices
|
|
|
Total Number
of Options
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life
(years)
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Total Number of Options
Exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life
(years)
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
$
|
2.46 - $9.00
|
|
|
|
635,787
|
|
|
|
9.23
|
|
|
$
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
328,075
|
|
|
|
9.26
|
|
|
$
|
2.76
|
|
$
|
9.06 – $15.00
|
|
|
|
1,266,229
|
|
|
|
7.05
|
|
|
$
|
13.50
|
|
|
|
1,099,463
|
|
|
|
6.89
|
|
|
$
|
13.38
|
|
$
|
15.06 – $24.00
|
|
|
|
158,207
|
|
|
|
6.45
|
|
|
$
|
17.28
|
|
|
|
156,818
|
|
|
|
6.44
|
|
|
$
|
17.22
|
|
$
|
24.06 –$195.30
|
|
|
|
475,428
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
|
|
$
|
30.90
|
|
|
|
475,428
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
|
|
$
|
30.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,535,651
|
|
|
|
7.26
|
|
|
$
|
14.28
|
|
|
|
2,059,784
|
|
|
|
6.91
|
|
|
$
|
16.02
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of all outstanding options and vested options as of September 30, 2017 was $0 and $0, respectively, representing options with exercise prices of less than the closing fair market value of our common stock on September 30, 2017 of $2.46 per share.
There were 3,980,781 and 5,417,132 warrants outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, at a weighted-average exercise price of $4.26 and $4.08.
Restricted Stock
In December 2016, the Company granted to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, 387,597 shares of restricted common stock, pursuant to the 2008 Plan. This restricted stock vests in equal annual instalments over three years. The fair value of the restricted stock is based on the market price of the Company's shares on the grant date less the par value received as consideration. The fair value of the restricted stock on the grant date was $1,000,000. The Company recorded an employee stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock of approximately $83,943 and $249,089 respectively, for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 as compared to zero for the comparative 2016 periods.
9.
Fair Value Measurements
Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the balance sheets are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure the fair value. Level inputs are as follows:
Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – other significant observable inputs for the assets or liabilities through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs that reflect management's best estimate of what market participants would use to price the assets or liabilities at the measurement date.
The
following
table summarizes fair value measurements by level at September 30, 2017 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
(In thousands)
|
|
Level I
|
|
|
Level II
|
|
|
Level III
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
45,090
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
45,090
|
|
Warrant liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,467
|
)
|
|
|
(2,467
|
)
|
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2016 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
(In thousands)
|
|
Level I
|
|
|
Level II
|
|
|
Level III
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
56,276
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
56,276
|
|
Warrant liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
Liabilities measured at market value on a recurring basis include warrant liabilities resulting from recent debt and equity financings. In accordance with ASC 815-40, the warrant liabilities are marked to market each quarter-end until they are completely settled. The warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes method, using assumptions consistent with our application of ASC 505-50. The $1.3 million decrease in fair value of the warrant liabilities is due to the significant excess of the exercise price over the Company's stock price as of September 30, 2017 and the expiration of warrants in July 2017.
We consider carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses to approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.
Our non-financial assets are measured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when an impairment charge is recognized. Our non-financial assets were not material at September
30, 2017
or
2016
.
10
.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2017, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $46.0 million. Management believes that our
current cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future.
The estimate is based, in part, upon our currently projected expenditures for the remainder of 2017 and the first ten months of 2018 of approximately $32.6 million
,
which
includes approximately $5.5 million for our clinical programs for aldoxorubicin, approximately $4.1 million for the research and clinical development of novel anti-cancer drug candidates at our Freiburg operations, approximately $0.8 million for general operation of our clinical programs, approximately $8.3 million for other general and administrative expenses, and approximately $13.7 million for interest and payments on the term loan. These projected expenditures are also based upon numerous other assumptions and subject to many uncertainties, and our actual expenditures may be significantly different from these projections.
If our licensing partner obtains marketing approval and successfully commercializes aldoxorubicin, we anticipate it could take several
years, for it to generate significant recurring revenue. We will be dependent on future financing and possible other strategic partnerships until such time, if ever, as it can generate significant recurring revenue. We have no commitments from third parties to provide any additional financing, and we may not be able to obtain future financing on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to obtain sufficient funding when needed, we may be forced to delay, scale back or eliminate all or a portion of our development programs, seek to license to other companies our product candidates or technologies that we would prefer to develop and commercialize ourself, or seek to sell some or all of our assets or merge with or be acquired by another company.
11.
Equity Transactions
In the first quarter of 2017, there were 518 shares of our outstanding Series B Convertible Preferred converted by the holders into 1.2 million shares of our common stock.
In the second and third quarters of 2017, there were 880,788 shares of our common stock issued from the exercise of warrants and options
On May 2, 2017, we issued 5.0 million shares of our common stock in a public offering.
On July 27, 2017, we issued 1,969,697 shares of our common stock and 500,000 warrants to purchase common stock as part of an exclusive licensing agreement granted to NantCell, Inc.
As of September 30, 2017, we have reserved approximately 2.0 million of our authorized but unissued shares of common stock for future issuance pursuant to our employee stock option plans issued to employees and consultants.
12.
Income Taxes
At December 31, 2016, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards as of $339.0 million and $224.0 million, respectively, available to offset against future taxable income, which expire in 2017 through 2036, of which $152.0 million and $145.0 million, respectively, are not subject to limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.
13.
Commitments and contingencies
Commitments
We
have an agreement with KTB Tumorforschungs GmbH, or KTB, for the Company's exclusive license of patent rights held by KTB for the worldwide development and commercialization of aldoxorubicin. Under the agreement, we must make payments to KTB in the aggregate of $6.0 million upon meeting clinical and regulatory milestones up to and including the product's second final marketing approval. We also have agreed to pay:
·
|
commercially reasonable royalties based on a percentage of net sales (as defined in the agreement);
|
·
|
a percentage of non-royalty sub-licensing income (as defined in the agreement); and
|
·
|
milestones of $1 million for each additional final marketing approval that we obtain.
|
In the event that we must pay a third party in order to exercise our right to the intellectual property under the agreement, we will deduct a percentage of those payments from the royalties due KTB, up to an agreed upon cap.
Contingencies
We applied
the disclosure provisions of ASC 460,
Guarantees
("ASC 460") to our agreements that contain guarantees or indemnities by us. We provide (i) indemnifications of varying scope and size to certain investors and other parties for certain losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party in connection with various types of third-party claims; and (ii) indemnifications of varying scope and size to officers and directors against third party claims arising from the services they provide to us.
Shareholder Derivative Actions in Delaware
. There are two competing derivative complaints pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery alleging claims related to our alleged retention of DreamTeamGroup and MissionIR. On December 14, 2015, a shareholder derivative complaint, captioned
Niedermeyer et al. v. Kriegsman et al.
, C.A. No. 11800, was filed against certain of our officers and directors, for which a second amended complaint was filed on October 12, 2016. On September 6, 2016, one of the plaintiffs in the California litigation (discussed above) effectively refiled his complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery, with the case captioned
Taylor v. Kriegsman
, C.A. No. 12720. Following competing motions for appointment of a lead plaintiff and lead counsel, On February 22, 2017, the Court of Chancery appointed
Niedermeyer et al.
as lead plaintiffs in the complaint. On May 3, 2017, the parties entered into negotiations with a mediator and on June 2, 2017, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") to settle the entire action. On June 15, 2017, the MOU was submitted to the Court and the parties are now seeking Court approval.
Class Action in California.
On July 25 and 29, 2016, nearly identical class action complaints were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, titled
Crihfield v. CytRx Corp., et al.
, Case No. 2:16-cv-05519 and
Dorce v. CytRx Corp.
, Case No. 2:16-cv-05666 alleging that we and certain of our officers violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by allegedly making materially false and/or misleading statements, and/or failing to disclose material adverse facts to the effect that the clinical hold placed on the Phase 3 trial of aldoxorubicin for STS would prevent sufficient follow-up for patients involved in the study, thus requiring further analysis, which could cause the trial's results and/or FDA approval to be materially adversely affected or delayed. The plaintiffs allege that such wrongful acts and omissions caused significant losses and damages to a class of persons and entities that acquired our securities between November 18, 2014 and July 11, 2016, and seek an award of compensatory damages, costs and expenses, including counsel and expert fees, and such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. On October 26, 2016, the Court entered an Order consolidating the actions titled
In re: CytRx Corporation Securities Litigation
, Master File No. 16-cv-05519-SJO and appointing a Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel. Following the filing of a first amended complaint on January 13, 2017, on March 14, 2017 the Company and the individual defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff filed an Opposition thereto on April 28, 2017. The Company and the individual defendants filed a Reply on May 30, 2017 and the matter was heard by the Court on June 12, 2017. On June 14, 2017, the Court issued an Order granting the Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint and the Individual Defendants filed a renewed Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff filed an Opposition thereto on July 24, 2017. The Company and the Individual Defendants filed a Reply on July 31, 2017. On August 14, 2017, the Court issued an Order granting in part and denying in part the motion
to dismiss
. On September 18, 2017, the Court issued an Order setting a schedule for the case
.
Discovery is ongoing
,
summary judgement
motions
are due no later than August 3, 2018, and the trial is scheduled for December 11, 2018.
Shareholder Derivative Action in Delaware (Zyontz).
On October 17, 2017, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed against certain current and former directors in the Delaware Court of Chancery, entitled
Zyontz v. Kriegsman et al.,
Case No. 2017-0738-JRS. The complaint essentially sets forth the allegations pled in the federal securities class action in California, asserts a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, and seeks damages, fees and costs, and other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. The Company is in the process of reviewing this lawsuit and will respond in due course to the Plaintiffs.
Shareholder Derivative Action in Delaware (Patterson).
On September 1, 2017, a shareholder derivative complaint was filed against the current directors in the Delaware Court of Chancery, entitled
Patterson v. Kriegsman et al.,
C.A. No. 2017-0636-TMR. The complaint sets forth claims for breach of fiduciary duty for allegedly disseminating false and misleading information, unjust enrichment, gross mismanagement, abuse of control and corporate waste based on allegations concerning various business decisions matters. The complaint seeks damages, corporate governance reforms, restitution, fees and costs, and other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. On September 26, 2017, the Company and individual defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, for which the opening brief in support of such motion was filed on November 3, 2017.
The Company intends to vigorously defend against the foregoing complaints. CytRx has directors' and officers' liability insurance, which will be utilized in the defense of these matters. The liability insurance may not cover all of the future liabilities the Company may incur in connection with the foregoing matters.
These claims are subject to inherent uncertainties, and management's view of these matters may change in the future.
The Company evaluates developments in legal proceedings and other matters on a quarterly basis.
The Company records accruals for loss contingencies to the extent that the Company concludes that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the related loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company has accrued $0.7 million of litigation settlement related to Shareholder Derivative actions.
We evaluate developments in legal proceedings and other matters on a quarterly basis. If an unfavorable outcome becomes probable and reasonably estimable, we could incur charges that could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations for the period in which the outcome becomes probable and reasonably estimable.