cottonisking
3 days ago
🗼🗼🗼 September 19, 2024 ECAPS' London Report (Term Sheet Agreement): 11. SUCCESSORS
11.1 GP1 shall not at any time assign, transfer or dispose of its interest in the PLC Sub-Notes
without the prior written consent of the Parties.
11.2 LBHI shall not assign, transfer or dispose of its interest in the PLC Sub-Debt:
👉️(a) on or before 15 December 2024, in any circumstances; and
(b) on and from 16 December 2024, unless:
(i) the assignee or transferee of LBHI’s interest agrees to be bound by the
terms of this Agreement; and
(ii) each of GP1 and DB (in the case of DB, only if it then holds 10% or more
of the ECAPS in issue) have consented to such assignment or transfer,
such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed. LBHI, GP1 and
DB each agree that it shall not be reasonable to withhold or delay consent
if the proposed transfer, assignment or disposal by LBHI of the PLC Sub-
Debt is for value, save for if there is a genuine demonstrable risk that the
assignment or transfer could undermine this Agreement or that the
proposed assignee or transferee intends to breach, undermine or take
action inconsistent with this Agreement.
11.3 DB shall not assign, transfer or dispose of its interest in the ECAPS, including the ECAPS
Deeds of Guarantee, unless the relevant assignee or transferee has agreed to be bound
by the terms of this Agreement as if it were DB.
11.4 If at any time after the Effective Date DB acquires any right, title and interest to any
additional ECAPS or ECAPS Deeds of Guarantee, then such additional holdings or
interests shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement as if DB held such
right, title and/or interest on the Effective Date.
12. PLC ESTATE – INFORMATION AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
12.1 Creditors’ committee observer
AZCowboy
5 days ago
~ Jerz, Good Morning' ... Thanks, All Is Fine Here in the Southwest, ... ~
It has been my conclusion that (while We' wait) that the Class 10-B's ... the CT's ... are supported by "Capital Assets" ... while the Class 11's and Class 12's were considered to be "equity participations" in LBHI ...
I have agreed with Both Joyce and TooGood ... as well as Swiss moving into 2025' ...
TooGood, with his application of the NOL's use, made available, needing a Class 11 (LBHI equity preferred offerings) and a Class 12 (LBHI original commons) equity recovery to be in a position to use those massive tax advantages as a forward going concern'
and,
Joyce, with her memory, mirroring my own of the reference to the "One Big Share" ... (Class 11's and Class 12's) ...
now, my own opinion only, ... IMO, LBHI is using the DTC as its Voting Agent, just like WaMu ... (Weil, setting this up, is the same) ...
AZ Disclaimer, ... I Own ALL Four LBHI Capital Asset Supported CT's that show properly in BOTH of my own individual accounts that hold them', (I check them daily) ... and ... I Also Own Class 12' LBHI Commons, that no longer show, however are not gone with the continued use of the DTC as my "Voting Agent" ... referring back to TooGood and the use of the NOL's ...
Merry Christmas to ALL
AZ
cottonisking
6 days ago
🤔🤔🤫 Founding and early history
edit
Blackstone was founded in 1985 by Peter G. Peterson and Stephen A. Schwarzman with US$400,000 (equivalent to $1.1 million in 2023) in seed capital.[2]:?45–56?[3] The founders derived their firm's name from their names: "Schwarz" is German for "black"; "Peter", "Petros", or "Petra" (??t??? and pet?a, the masculine and feminine rendering of the word, respectively) means "stone" or "rock" in Greek.[4][5] The two founders had previously worked together at 🤑Lehman Brothers. There, Schwarzman served as head of global mergers and acquisitions business.[6] Prominent investment banker Roger C. Altman, another Lehman veteran, left his position as a managing director of Lehman Brothers to join Peterson and Schwarzman at Blackstone in 1987, but left in 1992 to join the Clinton Administration as Deputy Treasury Secretary and later founded advisory investment bank Evercore Partners in 1995.[7
Who is the biggest shareholder in Barclays Bank?
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Barclays. The company's largest shareholder is 🤑BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 8.3%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.9% and 4.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.Feb 12, 2024
https://finance.yahoo.com › news
Barclays PLC (LON:BARC) is largely controlled by institutional ...
Who did Barclays buy in 2008?
Lehman Brothers 🥊🥊🥊
Bob's big bet: Barclays' purchase of Lehman Brothers 10 years later. When two days after Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy Barclays announced that it was buying the collapsed bank's prized US investment banking and capital markets business for just US$250m, the deal was widely seen as something of a coup.Sep 14, 2018
https://www.ifre.com › story › bob...
Bob's big bet: Barclays' purchase of Lehman Brothers 10 years later
edbk46
7 days ago
continue
HSGWSWAMU26YEARS boardpost
ChatGPT's take on this announcement:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION Board December 17, 2024 — Sunshine Act Meeting Notice
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has announced a Sunshine Act Meeting scheduled for December 17, 2024. The Sunshine Act requires that meetings of the FDIC's Board of Directors be open to the public, except under specific circumstances when parts of the meeting may be closed to the public for reasons such as national security, privacy, or law enforcement matters.
Typically, the notice for a Sunshine Act meeting will include:
1. Date and Time: The meeting is scheduled for December 17, 2024. The exact time of the meeting is usually included in the notice.
2. Agenda: The topics to be discussed at the meeting, which may include matters related to banking regulations, financial institutions, insurance premiums, or new policies affecting the banking system. Some items might be related to particular issues in the financial sector or ongoing regulatory changes.
3. Public Participation: Instructions on how the public can attend the meeting or submit comments, as well as whether the meeting will be accessible via teleconference or webcast.
4. Closed Sessions: If applicable, the notice will specify which parts of the meeting are closed to the public due to legal or confidentiality requirements.
5. Contact Information: The notice will include details for contacting the FDIC for further information.
If you need the full agenda or more specifics on the meeting, I can help you locate it if it's available online closer to the date. Would you like more details on the Sunshine Act or FDIC Board meetings?
You said:
Does this meeting have anything to do with the Washington Mutual Inc. Receivership?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
The December 17, 2024 FDIC Board Sunshine Act Meeting does not specifically mention the Washington Mutual, Inc. Receivership based on the information available at this time. However, meetings held by the FDIC Board may occasionally address issues related to receiverships or other large-scale financial matters, especially if new developments or regulatory adjustments arise.
Washington Mutual, Inc. Receivership Background
Washington Mutual, Inc. (WaMu) was a major financial institution that failed in 2008, and its assets were placed into receivership by the FDIC. The FDIC acted as the receiver for WaMu's holding company and its banking subsidiaries, which involved managing its assets, resolving outstanding claims, and handling any financial fallout from the failure. WaMu's receivership was one of the largest in U.S. history and led to significant policy changes regarding banking regulations and the FDIC's role in managing failing institutions.
What Could Be Discussed at the Meeting?
It's possible, though not confirmed, that the FDIC Board meeting could address issues related to legacy receiverships like Washington Mutual's if there are ongoing claims, legal matters, or financial reconciliations related to it. The FDIC continues to manage the remnants of such large receiverships and may have updates on related policies or procedures, though these typically would not be a primary focus unless a new significant development has occurred.
How to Find Out More
For the most accurate and detailed information, I would recommend checking the official FDIC website closer to the meeting date, where they will publish the meeting agenda. If you want, I can also assist you in tracking down more specific information as the date of the meeting approaches. Would you like me to help with that?
You said:
Yes.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Great! As the meeting date approaches, I will monitor any updates and check the official FDIC website for the agenda and any references to the Washington Mutual receivership or related matters. I can also assist you in finding any relevant details if something about it comes up during the meeting.
Feel free to check back with me closer to the date, or I can proactively check and update you if new information becomes available.
You said:
What does this sentence mean, " Discussion Draft relating to FDIC Policy on Bank Capital Distributions in Unusual and Exigent Circumstances."?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
"Discussion Draft relating to FDIC Policy on Bank Capital Distributions in Unusual and Exigent Circumstances" refers to a preliminary or draft version of a document being discussed or considered by the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) that addresses its policies on capital distributions by banks during certain exceptional or urgent situations.
Let's break it down:
• Discussion Draft: This implies that the document is still in a draft stage and is being reviewed or debated. It is not a final policy but a working version that will likely be refined or updated after discussions or feedback.
• FDIC Policy on Bank Capital Distributions: This refers to the FDIC's rules or guidelines regarding how banks are allowed to distribute their capital. Capital distributions generally refer to the ways in which banks return capital to their shareholders, such as through dividends or share buybacks.
• In Unusual and Exigent Circumstances: This part specifies that the policy focuses on exceptional or emergency situations, where normal banking operations or capital distribution practices might not apply. Exigent means urgent or pressing, so these would be cases where a bank's financial health, stability, or other critical factors require special attention and action from regulators.
In essence, this draft document is likely discussing how the FDIC will handle situations where banks want to distribute capital (e.g., pay dividends or repurchase shares) during crises or difficult times, when it might not be in the public's or the bank's best interest to do so. The draft would establish the criteria or restrictions the FDIC might impose under these unusual or urgent conditions to protect the bank's stability and the broader financial system.
This could be relevant in cases of economic downturns, unexpected financial losses, or other situations where a bank might be at risk, and regulators would need to ensure that distributing capital doesn't exacerbate the problem.
Would you like more details on how these policies typically work or why they might be important in banking regulation?
You said:
Yes.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Bank capital distributions—such as dividends, stock buybacks, or other forms of capital return to shareholders—are crucial decisions made by banks regarding how they use their profits or reserves. The FDIC, as a regulator, has policies in place to ensure that these decisions are made responsibly and do not undermine the financial stability of the bank or the broader financial system.
Why Capital Distributions Are Important
Capital distributions are one of the primary ways that banks share their profits with shareholders, which can be important for investor confidence. However, excessive distributions can weaken a bank's capital base, which could be problematic in times of financial stress. The amount of capital a bank retains is essential to its ability to absorb losses, maintain solvency, and continue operating smoothly, especially during crises.
Why the FDIC Regulates Bank Capital Distributions
The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) regulates these distributions to ensure that banks maintain sufficient capital to protect their solvency. This is especially important in situations where the bank may be exposed to risks such as:
• Economic downturns
• Financial crises
• Unexpected losses or stress
• Pandemics or natural disasters
In such circumstances, a bank might be tempted to pay dividends or buy back shares to maintain its attractiveness to investors, but doing so could deplete the bank's reserves, making it more vulnerable.
Unusual and Exigent Circumstances
The phrase "unusual and exigent circumstances" refers to exceptional situations that could affect the bank's financial stability or the broader economy. These could include:
• Economic crises (e.g., 2008 financial crisis)
• Sudden market disruptions (e.g., a pandemic like COVID-19)
• A significant drop in asset values or increasing loan defaults
• Systemic risks that could threaten the overall financial system (e.g., global financial contagion)
In these circumstances, the FDIC may impose restrictions on capital distributions, such as:
1. Limiting dividends: Banks may be required to retain more of their earnings rather than distributing them to shareholders.
2. Restricting buybacks: Stock buybacks may be prohibited to preserve capital within the bank.
3. Requiring additional capital buffers: Banks might be required to maintain or raise additional capital in case of unforeseen losses.
Why These Policies Matter
The goal of FDIC policy in these situations is to ensure the financial system remains stable and banks stay solvent. By regulating capital distributions, the FDIC aims to:
1. Strengthen bank resilience: Ensuring banks retain enough capital to weather downturns or other crises.
2. Protect depositors and taxpayers: Ensuring that FDIC-insured institutions do not put the federal deposit insurance system at risk.
3. Promote stability in the banking sector: Preventing large-scale failures or banking crises, which can have ripple effects throughout the economy.
In the event of a financial emergency or economic stress, the FDIC may also impose temporary restrictions on distributions to ensure banks are properly capitalized and able to absorb losses. By limiting how much a bank can pay out to shareholders, regulators help ensure the bank can continue lending, fulfilling its role in the economy, and weathering the crisis.
Example: The 2008 Financial Crisis
During the 2008 financial crisis, many banks were in dire need of capital and were facing increased risk of failure. The FDIC and other regulators stepped in to impose restrictions on capital distributions. Banks that had received bailouts or assistance from the government were restricted from paying out dividends or buying back shares to prevent them from using up their capital too quickly. This allowed the banks to rebuild their capital and improve their financial position.
Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic fallout, regulators imposed temporary restrictions on bank capital distributions to ensure that banks did not overextend themselves when many were facing financial uncertainty.
Conclusion
The "Discussion Draft" you referred to indicates that the FDIC is considering or discussing how to adjust or formalize its policies on capital distributions in times of unusual or exigent circumstances. This is likely to ensure that banks are not distributing too much capital when the financial environment is uncertain or risky, thereby protecting both the banks and the broader economy.
These discussions are important because they help balance the interests of shareholders and the need for financial stability, ensuring that banks can continue to operate effectively during times of stress without risking their solvency or placing undue burdens on taxpayers or depositors.
Let me know if you'd like more details or clarification on any specific aspect of this!
💚
Quote
More...
edbk46
7 days ago
something may be up
per goodietime ihub coop
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Board
December 17, 2024 — Sunshine Act Meeting Notice
Time and Date: 10:00 AM on December 17, 2024
PLACE: This Board meeting will be open to public observation only by webcast. Visit https://www.fdic.gov/news/board-matters/video.html for a link to the webcast. FDIC Board Members and staff will participate from FDIC Headquarters, 550 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC.
Observers requiring auxiliary aids (e.g., sign language interpretation) for this meeting should email DisabilityProgram@fdic.gov to make necessary arrangements.
STATUS: Open to public observation via webcast.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Board of Directors will meet to consider the following matters:
Discussion Agenda:
Proposed 2025 FDIC Operating Budget.
Discussion Draft relating to FDIC Policy regarding the Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act.
**** THIS PART:****
******
Discussion Draft relating to FDIC Policy on Bank Capital Distributions in Unusual and Exigent Circumstances.
******
Summary Agenda: No substantive discussion of the following items is anticipated. The Board will resolve these matters with a single vote unless a member of the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.
Minutes of a Board of Directors’ Meeting Previously Distributed.
Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Direct requests for further information concerning the meeting to Debra A. Decker, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.
AUTHORITY: 5 U.S.C. 552b
Dated at Washington, DC, on December 10, 2024.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
________________________________
Debra A. Decker
Executive Secretary
News
Market Data
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
Ask ADVFN Intelligence (AI)
JERSEYHAWG
2 hours ago
SwissCheeseAccount
6 days ago
