StayHumble
8 months ago
$HCMCs amended complaint, presents an Even Stronger Case in Favor of $HCMC
These specific, targeted allegations are sufficient to disavow
the contradictory statements in the attached MRTPA in which
Philip Morris Self-Reported that its products do not combust.
"Less Combustion = No Combustion" (based on Nonsense)
We thus hold that, in its original complaint,$HCMC stated a valid claim for patent infringement
under Eleventh Circuit law notwithstanding attachment of the MRTPA exhibit. II
We now turn to HCM’s amended complaint, which presents an even stronger case in favor of HCM.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58a1d7b8893fc0b6d3e47931/t/6436df8d94fa09523deadf45/1681317773824/2023-04-12_HCMC_v_PM_Appellate_Decision.pdf
StayHumble
8 months ago
$HCMCs amended complaint, presents an Even Stronger Case in Favor of $HCMC
These specific, targeted allegations are sufficient to disavow
the contradictory statements in the attached MRTPA in which
Philip Morris Self-Reported that its products do not combust.
"Less Combustion = No Combustion" (based on Nonsense)
We thus hold that, in its original complaint,$HCMC stated a valid claim for patent infringement
under Eleventh Circuit law notwithstanding attachment of the MRTPA exhibit. II
We now turn to HCM’s amended complaint, which presents an even stronger case in favor of HCM.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58a1d7b8893fc0b6d3e47931/t/6436df8d94fa09523deadf45/1681317773824/2023-04-12_HCMC_v_PM_Appellate_Decision.pdf