ADVFN Logo
Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
Icoa Inc (CE)

Icoa Inc (CE) (ICOA)

0.000001
0.00
(0.00%)
Closed September 19 4:00PM

Real-time discussions and trading ideas: Trade with confidence with our powerful platform.

Key stats and details

Current Price
0.000001
Bid
0.00
Ask
0.00
Volume
3
0.00 Day's Range 0.00
0.000001 52 Week Range 0.0006
Previous Close
0.000001
Open
-
Last Trade
3
@
0.0001
Last Trade Time
Average Volume (3m)
1,501,361
Financial Volume
-
VWAP
-

ICOA Latest News

TNS Offers Analysis on The Hottest Momentum Stocks and a Junior Explorer Who's Latest Copper Find Could Be Worth a Fortune

New York, NY -- March 7, 2022 -- InvestorsHub NewsWire -- via Traders News Source, a leading independent equity research and corporate access firm focused on small cap growth companies issues new...

PURA Signals BUY at $0.01 with "Explosive Long Trade" Potential and Near Term 3X ROI Possible

March 1, 2022 -- InvestorsHub NewsWire -- via pennymillions --  AmericanBulls.com Puration, Inc. (PURA) is reported today by AmericanBulls.com (americanbulls.com/PURA) to be...

Seeking Alpha -ALYI to ramp up electric vehicle rollout to new cities

February 25, 2022 -- InvestorsHub NewsWire -- via pennymillions --  Alternet Systems, Inc. (ALYI)     By: Jessica Kuruthukulangara, SA News Editor Alternet...

PURA Signals BUY At $0.008 With $0.04 52 Wk High

February 17, 2022 -- InvestorsHub NewsWire -- via pennymillions --  AmericanBulls.com Puraiton, Inc. (PURA) is reported today by AmericanBulls.com (americanbulls.com/PURA) to be...

PURA ALERT UPDATE - $0.008 50 Day MA Breakout Potential

February 16, 2022 -- InvestorsHub NewsWire -- via pennymillions -- Alert Update Puration, Inc. (PURA) was reported earlier today by AmericanBulls.com (americnabulls.com/PURA) to be...

Las Vegas Company Catches Premarket Bid On Wednesday

A Las Vegas-based telecom company announced that the company was able to settle and write off $1.76 million in convertible debt. The reason this particular stock is bid up this To read the full...

PJET Signals BUY

  October 11, 2021 -- InvestorsHub NewsWire -- via pennymillions --    American Bulls Priority Aviation, Inc. (PJET) is reported today by American Bulls...

PURA ALERT - PPS Up 25% On High Volume

October 8, 2021 -- InvestorsHub NewsWire -- via pennymillions Puration, Inc. (PURA) has seen its PPS increase 25% in the last week.  Yesterday the volume exceeeded 30 million shares with...

Seeking Alpha - 10 Cent ClickStream (CLIS) Poised For Dramatic Growth With Disruptive Apps For Online Gaming, Language Learning, Children Education And Music

October 4, 2021 -- InvestorsHub NewsWire -- via pennymillions --  Seeking Alpha  Current market for Language Learning is estimated at over $30 Billion Current market...

PAOG VERY BULLISH @ $0.003 - Penny Land Possible As PPS Edges Toward 200 Day MA

September 30, 2021 -- InvestorsHub NewsWire -- via pennymillions --  PAO Group, Inc. (PAOG) is reported today by Stock Technical Analysis (stockta.com/PAOG) to be signaling VERY...

PeriodChangeChange %OpenHighLowAvg. Daily VolVWAP
1001.0E-61.0E-61.0E-615001.0E-6CS
4001.0E-61.0E-61.0E-615001.0E-6CS
12001.0E-61.0E-61.0E-615013611.0E-6CS
26-9.9E-5-990.00010.00021.0E-626333979.422E-5CS
52-0.000499-99.80.00050.00061.0E-636039600.00022712CS
156-0.011199-99.99107142860.01120.02791.0E-6277216610.0083484CS
260001.0E-60.02791.0E-6382141920.00477677CS

Movers

View all
  • Most Active
  • % Gainers
  • % Losers
SymbolPriceVol.
JUVAFJuva Life Inc (CE)
$ 0.002
(199,900.00%)
15.5k
BLSTFBlackstone Minerals Ltd (PK)
$ 0.0271
(27,000.00%)
30k
TLSSTransportation and Logistics Systems Inc (CE)
$ 0.0001
(9,900.00%)
3.1M
GOSYGeckosystems International Corp (CE)
$ 0.0001
(9,900.00%)
1.15M
MMEXMMEX Resources Corporation (PK)
$ 0.0001
(9,900.00%)
745.41k
TEVNFTevano Systems Holdings Inc (CE)
$ 0.000001
(-99.99%)
10k
SNSTSunset Capital Assets Omc (CE)
$ 0.000001
(-99.99%)
85.03k
PNDDFPender Growth Fund Inc (PK)
$ 0.0012
(-99.98%)
100
HLLPFHello Pal International Inc (CE)
$ 0.000001
(-99.90%)
5k
ELOXEloxx Pharmaceuticals Inc (CE)
$ 0.000001
(-99.83%)
297
IMTLImage Protect Inc (PK)
$ 0.0002
(100.00%)
591.38M
TMGIMarquie Group Inc (PK)
$ 0.0001
(0.00%)
244.01M
SINCSincerity Applied Materials Holdings Corporation (PK)
$ 0.001
(42.86%)
214.48M
SIRCSolar Integrated Roofing Corporation (PK)
$ 0.0002
(0.00%)
167.08M
HMBLHUMBL Inc (PK)
$ 0.0001
(-33.33%)
118.85M

ICOA Discussion

View Posts
$PennyMover $PennyMover 2 days ago
3 short weeks
We may or may not receive information on the legal proceedings that may or may not assist in moving this away from Caveat Emptor status and just might point the way to some type of recovery!
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
carlson carlson 4 days ago
Thanks very much!
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
$PennyMover $PennyMover 4 days ago
**Current Extension:** The Tribunal extended the blocking orders until October 7, 2024, to protect the public interest and prevent dissipation of assets.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
$PennyMover $PennyMover 4 days ago
Just got wind that the next court date is October 7th if it helps.
I guess there was a continuance till then
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
$PennyMover $PennyMover 5 days ago
I didn't lose much & not worried cuz I only had maybe 500K if that. But I'd like to know or find out what happened in the courts on August 28th just to know
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
carlson carlson 5 days ago
I wish you only the best!!!
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
$PennyMover $PennyMover 5 days ago
I'm still trying to find out what the outcome from August Carlson
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
carlson carlson 5 days ago
Thanks!
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
Orange Cassidy Orange Cassidy 5 days ago
Sure you did! We know how well you trade these plays!
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
$PennyMover $PennyMover 5 days ago
Yea sure wish someone with court record status would post the outcome of Aug. 28th hearing so we know where we stand.

Something should pop up
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
carlson carlson 6 days ago
TEN days W/O a POST. Nobody gives a care about ICOA ANYMORE!!! LOVE HOW THEY KEPT US UP TO DATE. GLAD I SOLD MOST WHILE IT WAS STILL WORTH SOMETHING!!!!
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
GimmeThemDollars GimmeThemDollars 2 weeks ago
Does anyone know if a court hearing was held last week, and if so, what determinations were made?
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
Scratchgolf Scratchgolf 3 weeks ago
Hopefully we hear something soon. It would be a moon shot if the stock could get the CE removed and become current again. We'll shall see soon enough.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
ducktor ducktor 3 weeks ago
https://help.sec.gov/s/investor-complaint
😂 1 🤣 1
Orange Cassidy Orange Cassidy 3 weeks ago
Yes this company might be worth 1$ in total!
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
shanghai_steve shanghai_steve 3 weeks ago
This shitstain is d-e-a-d
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
RickNagra RickNagra 3 weeks ago
Oh wow. Dollar land on deck. Oh wow. Oh boy oh girl.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
GimmeThemDollars GimmeThemDollars 1 month ago
Thank you.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
carlson carlson 1 month ago
APPRECIATED!!!!!!!
🤥 1
$PennyMover $PennyMover 1 month ago
I think on the 27th of August or 28th. At any rate, it is next week
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
carlson carlson 1 month ago
Date?
🤥 1
GimmeThemDollars GimmeThemDollars 1 month ago
any word on the court case?
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
ducktor ducktor 1 month ago
3651 Lindell Rd.
Ste D
Las Vegas, NV 89103
icoa.tech
+1 (917) 5394271
info@icoa.tech
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
shanghai_steve shanghai_steve 1 month ago
Yep, now itโ€™s only degenerates talking about sucking deeks 🤦‍♂️
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
Orange Cassidy Orange Cassidy 1 month ago
It looks promising. Management abandoned it the paid pumpers moved on, cant buy the stock in the states and no bid.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
gunner1213 gunner1213 1 month ago
It looks like it...lol should have sold before it crashed.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
ducktor ducktor 1 month ago
Is this ticker dead?
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
carlson carlson 2 months ago
Sorry you already ate them ALL. YOU NASTY BOY!!!!!!!+++++ยฑ
🌈 2 👍️ 1
shanghai_steve shanghai_steve 2 months ago
Eat a dk u loosers
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
Orange Cassidy Orange Cassidy 2 months ago
Are you ok? You seem to be sundowning.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
carlson carlson 2 months ago
Something in the way you don't move me.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
Orange Cassidy Orange Cassidy 2 months ago
No they are all waiting for your bad takes on stocks before they make a move!
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
BigIbby BigIbby 2 months ago
Just more waiting until the end of August! Not much to say until then.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
carlson carlson 2 months ago
Did most SURRENDER????????
🤣 1
carlson carlson 2 months ago
Wake up!!!
👍️ 1 😴 1 🤣 1
GimmeThemDollars GimmeThemDollars 2 months ago
I am. Sounds like more waiting for now though.

Cheers
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
Orange Cassidy Orange Cassidy 2 months ago
Nope we have heard all of your LIES before
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
carlson carlson 2 months ago
Isn't anyone interested in what LIES AHEAD?
🤣 1
carlson carlson 2 months ago
Great QUESTION!!!!
🤣 1
SLes1 SLes1 2 months ago
Any further updates from the 7 July 2024 date?

There should be something of record after entered on the docket a continuance date or extension date or decision?

๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
NICKSCA123 NICKSCA123 2 months ago
Oct 7th is the extension date. Hopefully, it will be resolved at the merit meeting on August 28th.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
$PennyMover $PennyMover 2 months ago
Nice post and informative
👍️ 1 🔥 1
$PennyMover $PennyMover 2 months ago
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174723604
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
NICKSCA123 NICKSCA123 2 months ago


1] On April 18, 2022[1], the Administrative Tribunal for Financial Markets (โ€œTribunalโ€) issued, ex parte, blocking orders targeting the funds, securities and other property of the respondents and certain defendants and those held for them by the financial institutions in question.

[2] The initial freezing orders were issued as part of an investigation conducted by the Financial Markets Authority (โ€œAuthorityโ€) against the respondents. This investigation concerns alleged serious breaches of applicable legislation[2], essentially a market manipulation scheme in which the respondents allegedly participated.

[3] These blocking orders have been extended several times[3].

[4] The Court, on September 28, 2023[4], partially lifted the blocking orders in order to allow the liquidation - at the market price and within 6 months - of six securities held by the respondent Ramy Kamaneh in an account opened with the respondent TD Waterhouse Canada inc. as well as the deposit and conservation of the balance of these cash transactions in this account, all under close supervision by the Authority.

[5] The Authority presented to the Tribunal a request, dated October 5, 2023, aimed at extending the blocking orders currently in force in this case, for a period of 12 months. The Authority alleges that the investigation in the present case is still ongoing and that the reasons which justified the initial blocking orders still exist.

[6] During the pro forma hearing held on October 26, 2023, the respondents' lawyers informed the Court that they intended to contest this request for extension of the blocking orders presented by the Authority. A preparatory conference followed, on November 29, 2023, during which the Court set January 22, 2024 as the date of the hearing during which it will hear, on its merits, this request from the Authority.

[7] As the blocking orders in force in this case expired on November 8, 2023 and, moreover, the Court needs time to render a written decision following the hearing aimed at allowing it to to hear, on its merits, the request for extension presented by the Authority, the Court then decided - in order to continue to protect the public interest - to extend these blocking orders on an interim basis until February 8, 2024.

[8] Subsequently, on January 22, 2024 as planned, the Court heard on the merits the above-mentioned request for an extension from the Authority.

[9] After having taken note of the evidence and the arguments then presented to it by the parties' lawyers with regard to this request, the Court decides, in the public interest and as precautionary measures, to extend the blocking orders currently in force against the respondents and with regard to the third parties until July 7, 2024.

ANALYSIS

[10] For the Court to extend a freezing order, it must determine whether:

(1) the investigation carried out by the Authority with regard to the respondents is still ongoing[5];

(2) the grounds supporting the initial blocking orders still exist[6].

[11] As for the duration of the blocking order, the law provides that it is 12 months, unless the Court decides otherwise[7].

[12] The Authority's lawyer maintains that the initial reasons which justified the issuance of freezing orders in the context of this case still exist and that the Authority's investigation continues.

[13] He pleads for the Court to extend the blocking orders currently in force in this case until November 8, 2024.

[14] The respondents' lawyers do not dispute that the aforementioned initial reasons still exist or that the Authority's investigation is continuing. However, they plead for the blocking orders in force in this case to only be extended for a period of 60 days after their current expiry of February 8, 2024.

[15] During the hearing, a principal investigator from the Authority assigned to this case testified and essentially informed the Court that the entire investigation report and the documentation collected as evidence by the investigators is in possession of the Authority's litigation since October 2023.

16] The litigation must ultimately submit to the Authority's decision-makers a recommendation regarding the future legal progress of this case. Before doing so, the dispute could, however, request one or more additional investigations from the investigators.

[17] The Court recalls that the blocking orders it issued in the context of this case are precautionary measures which aim to prevent the potential squandering of significant sums of money which could have been illicitly collected by the respondents following apparent serious breaches of sections 195.2 and 199.1 of the Securities Act as well as following apparent acts contrary to the public interest, which risk causing irreparable harm to the integrity of financial markets and the investing public, while affecting investor confidence in these markets.

[18] The Court takes note of the fact that the investigation report as well as all the documentation collected as evidence by the investigators have been in the hands of the Authority's litigation since October 2023, i.e. since approximately three months.

[19] The Court also takes note of the fact that no decision as to the follow-up to be given to the aforementioned investigation report has yet been taken by the litigation.

[20] Thus, in the current state of affairs, it remains possible that the investigation report, accompanied by all the evidence collected to date by the investigators, results in a decision by the regulator not to initiate any additional legal proceedings whatsoever against the respondents.

[21] It is also within the realm of possibility that a decision is taken by the Authority's litigation to ask the investigators for one or more additional information and that, subsequently, the regulator decides - following a recommendation from its litigation - to initiate legal proceedings of a criminal or administrative nature against the respondents.

[22] For the moment, the Court can only note that the Authority's investigation, in the broad sense, is continuing and, in light of the testimony given by a principal investigator in the file, the Court is of the opinion that this investigation - in the broad sense - will likely evolve significantly over the next six months or so.

[23] Given the broad scope of the freezing orders it issued in the context of this case and the impact that these orders have on the respondent and respondent parties, the Tribunal is of the opinion that It is reasonable - in the circumstances and in the public interest - to extend the blocking orders currently in force in this case until July 7, 2024.

[24] This additional extension period will allow the Authority's litigation department to continue its analysis of the investigation report and the evidence collected by the investigators as well as possibly ask the investigators to collect additional information. This additional period will also allow litigation to potentially present recommendations to the Authority's decision-makers on the follow-up to be given to this case and for them to take, in the public interest, a decision in this regard.

[25] In the opinion of the Tribunal, it is important that freezing orders only continue for a period when they are absolutely necessary in the public interest.

[26] Furthermore, the Court recognizes the particularly complex nature of investigations related to market manipulation schemes, particularly when a multi-jurisdictional component is associated.

[27] After hearing the evidence and the arguments presented to it by the parties' lawyers, the Tribunal is of the opinion that the reasons which justified the issuance of the initial blocking orders in this case still exist and that the investigation, in the broad sense of the term, by the Authority with regard to the respondents is still ongoing.

[28] Consequently, the Court decides that it is in the public interest to extend until July 7, 2024, as a precautionary measure, the blocking orders currently in force in this case.

FOR THESE REASONS, the Administrative Tribunal for Financial Markets, in the public interest and under section 93 of the Financial Sector Regulation Act[8], sections 249 and 250 of the Securities Act and sections 119 and 120 of the Derivatives Act:

EXTENDS the freezing orders it issued on April 18, 2023, as renewed since, until July 7, 2024, in the following manner, unless they are modified or repealed before the expiry of this term :

ORDERS the respondent Ramy Kamaneh and the respondents SDIT inc. and SDร‰T inc. not to, directly or indirectly, withdraw or dispose of funds, securities or other property that they have in their possession or funds, securities or other property in the possession of another person who has the deposit, custody or control for Ramy Kamaneh, SDIT inc. and SDร‰T inc., notably in the following bank accounts and brokerage accounts:

ORDERS the respondent Ramy Kamaneh and the respondent Doua'a Ismail not to, directly or indirectly, transfer, encumber, alter, destroy and/or alienate the building with the building built on it bearing the civic number [address 1] , Montreal (รŽle-Bizard), province of Quebec, [...], known and designated as lot number [...] ([...]) of the Cadastre of Quebec, in the registration division of Montreal;

ORDERS the respondent Toronto Dominion Bank inc., having a branch at 3720, boulevard des Sources, in the city of Dollard-des-Ormeaux, province of Quebec, H9B 1Z9, not to dispose of, directly or indirectly, the funds, securities or other property that it has on deposit or of which it has custody or control for the respondent Ramy Kamaneh and the defendants SDIT inc. and SDร‰T inc., notably in the following bank accounts:


๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
NICKSCA123 NICKSCA123 2 months ago
Hi. I'll have a look for the full transcript. Sorry where did I post Oct 17th?
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
$PennyMover $PennyMover 2 months ago
Thanks, Nick, the question is do you have the full transcript to post?

Nice to see how long the extension is. I see you noted Oct 17
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
NICKSCA123 NICKSCA123 2 months ago
You're welcome. There's a merit hearing on August 28th. This ordeal could be over then even though the extension is until Oct 7th.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
RKhan2011 RKhan2011 2 months ago
Thx bubba. Nicely done.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0
RKhan2011 RKhan2011 2 months ago
Woo hoo. Okayyyyy.. Whatโ€™s another months and a half mehhh
🤣 1
Orange Cassidy Orange Cassidy 2 months ago
Wrong as usual.
๐Ÿ‘๏ธ0

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock