gotmilk
3 weeks ago
Best case scenario is to counter the "Racketeer/Corrupt Organization" charge against Bourque Industries.
If Bourque Industries continues "as is" into the trial, then the fact "Since 2011 the cash inputs directly into Bourque Industries has not advanced this company to where a product is sold, producing a revenue stream suitable to identify that this company is not a scam." speaks of John Bourque and the Board of Director engaging in criminal activity to victimize investors that transferred cash directly into Bourque Industries while never producing any positive results.
All Bourque Industries can do, is now before the trial, produce activity that will put Bourque Industries onto a path to become a successful company and show that it's not a scam.
For example, prove to an established alloy producing company that Kryron is for real and have them accept a majority of shares in Bourque Industries so that they can establish Bourque Industries as a valid company.
So far, John Bourque will take Bourque Industries to the grave as a failed company.
doug
gotmilk
7 months ago
Question: What are the possible outcomes?
Boss Consulting Inc v. Terminator Armor, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: Boss Consulting Inc
Defendant: Bourque Industries, Inc., John M. Bourque, Terminator Armor, Inc., Ohana Capital Financial, Aaron M. Mckown P.A. and Carol J. Condon
First need to identify the objective (goal intended to be attained) for Boss Consulting.
Do they want the current management of Bourque Industries to be removed, this with the stated opinion that Kryron can be successfully brought to market with new people.
doug