UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
Commission File Number: 0-23642
NORTHWEST
AIRLINES CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
41-1905580
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.)
|
|
|
|
2700
Lone Oak Parkway, Eagan, Minnesota
|
|
55121
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
(612) 726-2111
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a
non-accelerated filer. See definitions
of large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
x
|
Accelerated
filer
o
|
Non-accelerated
filer
o
(Do
not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by a check mark
whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports
required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan
confirmed by a court. Yes
x
No
o
As of April 11, 2008,
there were 243,903,924 shares of the registrants Common Stock outstanding.
NORTHWEST
AIRLINES CORPORATION
2
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
NORTHWEST
AIRLINES CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(Unaudited, in millions except per share amounts)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Operating
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger
|
|
$
|
2,239
|
|
$
|
2,202
|
|
Regional carrier
revenues
|
|
410
|
|
292
|
|
Cargo
|
|
198
|
|
189
|
|
Other
|
|
280
|
|
190
|
|
Total operating
revenues
|
|
3,127
|
|
2,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel
and taxes
|
|
1,114
|
|
704
|
|
Salaries, wages
and benefits
|
|
670
|
|
615
|
|
Aircraft
maintenance materials and repairs
|
|
221
|
|
184
|
|
Selling and
marketing
|
|
193
|
|
191
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
148
|
|
121
|
|
Other rentals
and landing fees
|
|
138
|
|
141
|
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
93
|
|
96
|
|
Regional carrier
expenses
|
|
205
|
|
211
|
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
|
3,917
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
481
|
|
409
|
|
Total operating
expenses
|
|
7,180
|
|
2,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Income (Loss)
|
|
(4,053
|
)
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income (Expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net
|
|
(114
|
)
|
(132
|
)
|
Investment
income
|
|
37
|
|
31
|
|
Reorganization
items, net
|
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
Total other
income (expense)
|
|
(86
|
)
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
(4,139
|
)
|
(293
|
)
|
Income tax
expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,139
|
)
|
$
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss)
per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted
|
|
$
|
(15.78
|
)
|
$
|
(3.34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares
used in computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted
|
|
262
|
|
87
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
3
NORTHWEST AIRLINES CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(Unaudited, in millions except share data)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,187
|
|
$
|
2,939
|
|
Unrestricted
short-term investments
|
|
40
|
|
95
|
|
Restricted cash,
cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
484
|
|
725
|
|
Accounts
receivable, less allowance (2008$4, 2007$4)
|
|
750
|
|
776
|
|
Flight equipment
spare parts, less allowance (2008$16, 2007$10)
|
|
133
|
|
135
|
|
Maintenance and
operating supplies
|
|
168
|
|
180
|
|
Prepaid expenses
and other
|
|
196
|
|
187
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
4,958
|
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight
equipment, net
|
|
7,745
|
|
7,520
|
|
Other property
and equipment, net
|
|
583
|
|
558
|
|
Total property
and equipment
|
|
8,328
|
|
8,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight
Equipment Under Capital Leases, net
|
|
8
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
2,199
|
|
6,035
|
|
International
routes, less accumulated amortization (2008$3; 2007$2)
|
|
2,975
|
|
2,976
|
|
Other
intangibles, less accumulated amortization (2008$77; 2007$54)
|
|
2,113
|
|
2,136
|
|
Investments in
affiliated companies
|
|
217
|
|
24
|
|
Other, less
accumulated depreciation and amortization (2008$14; 2007$8)
|
|
234
|
|
223
|
|
Total other
assets
|
|
7,738
|
|
11,394
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$
|
21,032
|
|
$
|
24,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Air traffic
liability/deferred frequent flier liability
|
|
$
|
2,266
|
|
$
|
2,004
|
|
Accounts payable
and other liabilities
|
|
1,748
|
|
1,651
|
|
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
|
623
|
|
446
|
|
Current
obligations under capital leases
|
|
8
|
|
3
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
4,645
|
|
4,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Debt
|
|
6,500
|
|
6,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Obligations Under Capital Leases
|
|
117
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
Credits and Other Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
pension and postretirement health care benefits
|
|
3,646
|
|
3,638
|
|
Deferred
frequent flier liability
|
|
1,540
|
|
1,490
|
|
Deferred income
taxes
|
|
1,131
|
|
1,131
|
|
Other
|
|
167
|
|
138
|
|
Total deferred
credits and other liabilities
|
|
6,484
|
|
6,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01
par value; shares authorized400,000,000; shares issued242,716,163 and
233,187,998 at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
7,267
|
|
7,235
|
|
Retained
earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
(3,797
|
)
|
342
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
(186
|
)
|
(202
|
)
|
Treasury stock2,931
and 1,684 at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common
stockholders equity
|
|
3,286
|
|
7,377
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
21,032
|
|
$
|
24,517
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
4
NORTHWEST AIRLINES
CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(Unaudited, in millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,139
|
)
|
$
|
(292
|
)
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
148
|
|
121
|
|
Pension and
other postretirement benefit contributions less than (greater than) expense
|
|
(1
|
)
|
(10
|
)
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
Reorganization
items, net
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
|
3,917
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in cash flows from operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in
certain assets and liabilities
|
|
70
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Air traffic
liability/deferred frequent flyer liability
|
|
313
|
|
308
|
|
Long-term vendor
deposits/holdbacks
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Post-emergence
reorganization payments
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
25
|
|
12
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
362
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Reorganization Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by reorganization activities
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
(366
|
)
|
(72
|
)
|
Purchase of
short-term investments
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Proceeds from
sales of short-term investments
|
|
55
|
|
10
|
|
Decrease
(increase) in restricted cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
240
|
|
(89
|
)
|
Proceeds from
sale of investment in affiliate
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
Investments in
affiliated companies
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
(263
|
)
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from
long-term debt
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
Payments of
long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
(96
|
)
|
(147
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
149
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
248
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
2,939
|
|
1,461
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
3,187
|
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available to be
borrowed under credit facilities
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents and unrestricted short-term investments at end of period
|
|
$
|
3,227
|
|
$
|
2,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing and
Financing Activities Not Affecting Cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer
financing of aircraft and other non-cash transactions
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
See
accompanying notes.
5
NORTHWEST
AIRLINES CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The condensed
consolidated financial statements of Northwest Airlines Corporation (NWA Corp.),
the direct parent corporation of Northwest Airlines, Inc. (Northwest),
include the accounts of NWA Corp. and all consolidated subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company). Unless
otherwise indicated, the terms we, us, and our refer to NWA Corp. and all
consolidated subsidiaries. The condensed
consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared pursuant
to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information and footnote disclosures
normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) have been condensed or
omitted as permitted by such rules and regulations. These financial
statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and notes included in the Companys audited consolidated financial
statements, which are provided in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, as amended by the Form 10-K/A
filing dated April 29, 2008 (collectively, the 2007 Form 10-K).
Northwests
operations account for approximately 99% of the Companys consolidated
operating revenues and expenses.
Northwest is a major air carrier engaged principally in the commercial
transportation of passengers and cargo, directly serving as many as 243 cities
in 22 countries in North America, Asia and Europe. Northwests global airline network includes
domestic hubs at Detroit, Minneapolis/St. Paul and Memphis, an extensive
Pacific route system with a hub in Tokyo, a transatlantic joint venture with
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (KLM), which operates through a hub in Amsterdam, a
domestic and international alliance with Continental Airlines, Inc. (Continental)
and Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta), membership in SkyTeam, a global
airline alliance with KLM, Continental, Delta, Air France, Aeroflot, Alitalia,
Aeromexico, China Southern, CSA Czech Airlines and Korean Air, exclusive
marketing agreements with three domestic regional carriers, Pinnacle Airlines, Inc.
(Pinnacle), Mesaba Aviation, Inc. (Mesaba), a wholly-owned subsidiary,
and Compass Airlines, Inc. (Compass), a wholly-owned subsidiary, which
currently operate as Northwest Airlink carriers and a cargo business that
includes a dedicated fleet of freighter aircraft that operate through hubs in
Anchorage and Tokyo.
As a result of the
application of fresh-start reporting in accordance with American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 90-7,
Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under
the Bankruptcy Code
(SOP 90-7) upon the Companys emergence from
bankruptcy on May 31, 2007, the financial statements prior to June 1,
2007 are not comparable with the financial statements for periods on or after June 1,
2007. References to Successor Company refer to the Company on or after June 1,
2007, after giving effect to the application of fresh-start reporting.
References to Predecessor Company refer to the Company prior to June 1,
2007. See Note 3 Fresh-Start
Reporting for further details.
The Company maintains a
Web site at
http://www.nwa.com
. Information contained on the Companys Web
site is not incorporated into this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, all amendments to
those reports and other information about the Company are available free of
charge through this Web site at
http://ir.nwa.com
as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports are electronically filed
with or furnished to the SEC.
In
the opinion of management, the interim financial statements reflect
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, unless otherwise noted,
which are necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position, results
of operations and cash flows for the periods indicated.
The Companys results
of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results
for an entire year due to seasonal factors as well as competitive and general
economic conditions. The Companys second
and third quarter operating results have historically been more favorable due
to increased leisure travel on domestic and international routes during the
spring and summer months.
Merger Announcement.
On April 14,
2008, the Company and Delta entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger
Agreement) that provides, among other things, for the Company to be merged
with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Delta (the Merger).
6
Consummation of the Merger is subject to
customary closing conditions, including shareholder approval by holders of
common stock of NWA Corp. and Delta and receiving certain domestic and foreign
regulatory and antitrust approvals (including from the Federal Aviation Administration
and the United States Department of Transportation, under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and pursuant to Council
Regulation (EEC) 139/2004 of the European Commission). The Merger Agreement contains certain termination
rights for both NWA Corp. and Delta. The
Merger Agreement further provides that, upon termination of the Merger
Agreement under specified circumstances, the Company may be required to pay to
Delta, or Delta may be required to pay to the Company, a termination fee of
$165 million.
Under
the terms of the Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of the Companys
common stock will be converted into the right to receive 1.25 shares of Delta
common stock. Stock options and other
equity awards granted under the Companys 2007 Management Equity Plan will
convert into stock options and equity awards with respect to Delta common
stock, after giving effect to the exchange ratio.
Certain
contracts, employee benefit arrangements and debt instruments of the Company
contain change in control provisions that may be triggered by the Merger,
resulting in changes to the terms or settlement amounts of the contracts,
arrangements or instruments.
We
currently expect the Merger to close by the end of 2008. However, factors outside of our control could
require us to complete the Merger at a later time or not to complete it at all.
Stockholder
Rights Plan.
Pursuant to the Stockholder Rights Plan (the Rights
Plan), each share of common stock has attached to it a right and, until the
rights expire or are redeemed, each new share of common stock issued by NWA
Corp., will include one right. Once
exercisable, each right entitles the holder (other than the acquiring person or
group) to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $120, subject to
adjustment. The rights become
exercisable upon the occurrence of certain events, including the acquisition by
any air carrier with passenger revenues in excess of approximately $1 billion
per year (as such amount may be increased based on increases in the Consumer
Price Index from 2000) (a Major Carrier), a holding company of a Major
Carrier or any of their respective affiliates acquires beneficial ownership of
20% or more of NWA Corp.s outstanding common stock or commences a tender or
exchange offer that would result in such person or group acquiring beneficial
ownership of 20% or more of NWA Corp.s outstanding common stock. The rights expire on May 31, 2017, and
may be redeemed by NWA Corp. at a price of $.01 per right prior to the time
they become exercisable.
On April 14, 2008, prior
to the execution of the Merger Agreement, the Company amended the Rights Plan
to provide, among other things, that neither the approval, execution, delivery,
announcement or performance of the Merger Agreement or the consummation of the
Merger or any other transactions contemplated thereby will cause a triggering
event under which the rights would become exercisable. The amendment also provides that the Rights
Plan and the rights established thereby will terminate in all respects
immediately prior to the Merger becoming effective.
Restrictions
on the Transfer of Common Stock.
To reduce the risk of a
limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code on the Companys
ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs), the Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation restricts certain transfers of common
stock for two years after the Companys emergence from bankruptcy. Such restrictions can be extended thereafter
for three consecutive one year periods (to June 2012) upon, each time, the
affirmative vote of the Companys stockholders.
During the two year period, these restrictions generally provide that
any attempted transfer of common stock prior to the expiration of the term of
the transfer restrictions will be prohibited and void if such transfer would
cause the transferees ownership interest in the Company to increase to 4.95%
or above, including an increase in a transferees ownership interest from 4.95%
or above to a greater ownership interest, unless approved by the Board of
Directors on the basis that the transfer does not increase the risk of an
ownership change. In the event that
these restrictions are extended beyond the two year period, the Board of
Directors will approve proposed transfers that, taking into account all prior
transfers, do not result in an aggregate owner shift under Section 382 of
more than 30%. If the aggregate owner
shift as of any date after the two year period exceeds 30%, the Board of
Directors has the discretion to approve any subsequent transfers subject to the
standards applicable during the two year period until the earlier of the date
on which the aggregate owner shift no longer exceeds 30%, or the restriction is
no longer in effect.
Note 2 Voluntary Reorganization Under Chapter 11
Background and General Bankruptcy Matters.
The following discussion provides general background information
regarding the Companys Chapter 11 cases, and is not intended to be an
exhaustive summary. Detailed information
pertaining to the bankruptcy filings may be obtained at
http://www.nwa-restructuring.com
.
7
On
September 14, 2005 (the Petition Date), NWA Corp. and 12 of its direct
and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the Debtors) filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code with
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the Bankruptcy
Court). Subsequently, on September 30,
2005, NWA Aircraft Finance, Inc., an indirect subsidiary of NWA Corp.,
also filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11. On May 18, 2007, the Bankruptcy Court
entered an order approving and confirming the Debtors First Amended Joint and
Consolidated Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (as
confirmed, the Plan or Plan of Reorganization). The Plan became effective and the Debtors
emerged from bankruptcy protection on May 31, 2007 (the Effective Date). On the Effective Date, the Company
implemented fresh-start reporting in accordance with SOP 90-7.
The Plan generally provided for the full
payment or reinstatement of allowed administrative claims, priority claims, and
secured claims, and the distribution of new common stock of the Successor
Company to the Debtors creditors, employees and others in satisfaction of
allowed unsecured claims. The Plan
contemplates the issuance of approximately 277 million shares of new common
stock by the Successor Company out of the 400 million shares of new common
stock authorized under its amended and restated certificate of incorporation.
The new common stock is
listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE) and began trading under the
symbol NWA on May 31, 2007.
Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, stockholders of NWA Corp. prior
to the Effective Date received no distributions and their stock was cancelled.
In connection with the
consummation of the Plan of Reorganization, on the Effective Date, the Companys
existing $1.225 billion Senior Corporate Credit Facility (Bank Credit Facility)
was converted into exit financing in accordance with its terms. See Note 10 Long-Term Debt for additional
information.
Claims
Resolution Process
. Pursuant to terms of the Plan of
Reorganization, approximately 234.4 million shares of the Successor Companys
common stock will be issued to holders of allowed general unsecured and
guaranty claims of the Debtors. Once a
claim is allowed consistent with the claims resolution process, the claimant is
entitled to a distribution of new common stock. Approximately 216.1
million shares of new common stock have been issued and distributed through April 2008,
in respect of valid unsecured and guaranty claims. In total, there are approximately 18.3
million remaining shares of new common stock held in reserve under the terms of
the Plan of Reorganization. The Merger
Agreement contemplates that following the Merger the right to receive shares
held in the reserves will become the right to receive shares of Delta common
stock adjusted for the exchange ratio.
The
Company estimates that the probable range of unsecured claims to be allowed
will be between $8.0 and $8.4 billion.
Differences between claim amounts filed and the Companys estimates are
being investigated and will be resolved in connection with the claims
resolution process. However, there will be no further financial impact to the
Company associated with the settlement of such unsecured claims, as the holders
of all allowed unsecured claims against the Predecessor Company will receive
under the Plan of Reorganization only their pro rata share of the distribution
of the newly issued Common Stock of the Successor Company. Secured claims were deemed unimpaired under
the Plan of Reorganization and were satisfied upon either reinstatement of the
obligations in the Successor Company, surrendering the collateral to the
secured party, or by making full payment in cash.
Note 3 Fresh-Start Reporting
Upon emergence from its Chapter 11 proceedings on May 31, 2007, the
Company adopted fresh-start reporting in accordance with SOP 90-7. The Companys emergence from Chapter 11
resulted in a new reporting entity with no retained earnings or accumulated
deficit. Accordingly, the Companys
consolidated financial statements for periods prior to June 1, 2007 are
not comparable to consolidated financial statements presented on or after June 1,
2007.
Fresh-start reporting reflects the value of the Company as determined in
the confirmed Plan of Reorganization. Under fresh-start reporting, the Companys
asset values are remeasured and allocated in conformity with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141,
Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141).
The excess of reorganization value over the fair value of tangible and
identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, fresh-start reporting also required
that all liabilities, other than deferred taxes and pension and other
postretirement benefit obligations, be stated at fair value or at the present
values of the amounts to be paid using appropriate market interest rates.
Deferred taxes were determined in conformity with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS No. 109). As part of the provisions of SOP 90-7, on June 1,
2007 we were required to adopt all accounting guidance that was going to be
effective within the subsequent twelve-month period. See Note 5 Fair Value Measurements for
additional information.
Estimates of fair value represented the Companys best estimates based
on its valuation models which incorporated industry data and trends and
relevant market rates and transactions.
8
To
facilitate the calculation of the enterprise value of the Successor Company,
Northwests financial advisors assisted management in the preparation of a
valuation analysis for the Successor Companys common stock to be distributed
as of the Effective Date to the unsecured creditors. The enterprise valuation included (i) a
40% weighting towards a comparable company analysis based on financial ratios
and multiples of comparable companies, which were then applied to the financial
projections developed by the Company to arrive at an enterprise value; and (ii) a
60% weighting towards a discounted cash flow analysis which measures the
projected multi-year, un-levered free cash flows of the Company to arrive at an
enterprise value.
The estimated enterprise value and
corresponding equity value in fresh-start reporting were highly dependent upon
achieving the future financial results set forth in the five-year financial
projections included in the Companys Plan of Reorganization, as well as the
realization of certain other assumptions.
The equity value of the Company in fresh-start reporting was calculated
to be a range of approximately $6.45 billion to $7.55 billion. Based on claims trading prior to the Companys
Effective Date and the trading value of the Companys common stock post
emergence, the equity value of the Company was estimated to be $6.45 billion
for purposes of preparing the Companys financial statements. The estimates and assumptions made in this
valuation were inherently subject to significant uncertainties and the
resolution of contingencies beyond the reasonable control of the Company. See Note 4 Goodwill and Intangibles for a
description of the $3.9 billion goodwill impairment charge recorded in the
first quarter of 2008.
Note 4 Goodwill and Intangibles
Goodwill
represents the excess of the reorganization value of the Successor Company over
the fair value of tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets resulting
from the application of SOP 90-7.
Northwests goodwill mainly consists of three components:
·
A valuation allowance recorded against our net
deferred tax assets, as required by SFAS No. 109; this valuation allowance
will be reversed against goodwill when the Company reports income in future
periods.
·
Revenue-generating intangibles that do not meet
the contractual or separable criteria of SFAS No. 141, including our
flight network and international routes to open skies countries.
·
The value inherent in future customer
relationships due to Northwests ability to attract new customers.
Identifiable
intangible assets consist primarily of international route authorities, trade
names, the WorldPerks customer database, airport slots/airport operating
rights, certain partner contracts and other items. International route
authorities, certain airport slots/airport operating rights and trade names are
indefinite-lived and, as such, are not amortized. The Companys definite-lived intangible
assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated lives of the
related assets, which span periods of four to 30 years.
The following table presents information about our intangible assets,
including goodwill, at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Asset Life
|
|
Gross Carrying
Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
Gross Carrying
Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
SkyTeam alliance & other
code share partners
|
|
30
|
|
$
|
461,900
|
|
$
|
(12,831
|
)
|
$
|
461,900
|
|
$
|
(8,981
|
)
|
England airport
operating rights
|
|
5
|
|
16,000
|
|
(2,667
|
)
|
16,000
|
|
(1,867
|
)
|
NWA customer
relationships
|
|
9
|
|
530,000
|
|
(49,074
|
)
|
530,000
|
|
(34,352
|
)
|
WorldPerks
affinity card contract
|
|
15
|
|
195,700
|
|
(10,873
|
)
|
195,700
|
|
(7,611
|
)
|
WorldPerks
marketing partner relationships
|
|
22
|
|
43,000
|
|
(1,629
|
)
|
43,000
|
|
(1,140
|
)
|
Visa contract
|
|
4
|
|
11,900
|
|
(2,479
|
)
|
11,900
|
|
(1,736
|
)
|
Gates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific routes
and Narita slots/airport operating rights
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
2,961,700
|
|
|
|
2,961,700
|
|
|
|
NWA trade name
and other
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
663,625
|
|
|
|
663,625
|
|
|
|
Slots/airport
operating rights
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
283,300
|
|
|
|
283,300
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
2,199,228
|
|
|
|
6,034,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,366,353
|
|
$
|
(79,553
|
)
|
$
|
11,201,734
|
|
$
|
(55,687
|
)
|
9
Total amortization expense recognized was approximately $23.9 million and
$0.4 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2008 and March 31,
2007, respectively. We expect to record
amortization expense of $95.5 million per year from 2008 through 2010, $93.7
million in 2011 and $90.6 million in 2012.
The Company tests the carrying amount of
goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets annually as of October 1
or whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have
occurred. Impairment testing is
performed in accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142). The Company is annually required to complete
Step 1 (determining and comparing the fair value of the Companys reporting
unit to its carrying value) of the impairment test. Step 2 is required to be completed if Step 1
indicates that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value
and involves the calculation of the implied fair value of goodwill.
The Company determined that the announced
Merger with Delta was a triggering event under SFAS No. 142, requiring the
Company to further evaluate the carrying value of its goodwill. As a result of this evaluation, the Company
recorded an impairment charge to reduce the book value of Northwests equity to
its implied fair value as of the Merger announcement date. Based on the 5-day average closing price of
Deltas common stock around the Merger announcement date, the right to receive
1.25 shares of Delta stock for each share of the Companys common stock, and
the projected number of the Companys common shares to be converted into Delta
common stock on the transaction close date, the implied fair value of the
Companys equity on the announcement date was $3.3 billion. This implied fair value calculation resulted
in the Company recording a goodwill impairment charge of $3.9 billion as of March 31,
2008 because we believe the conditions that caused our implied fair value to
decline existed as of March 31.
Due to the limited time available between the
Merger announcement date and the Companys Form 10-Q filing date, there
was insufficient time to complete Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test and
calculate the implied fair value of goodwill as described in SFAS No. 142. Once Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test
is completed during the second quarter, the amount of impairment recorded could
increase or decrease.
In
accordance with SOP 90-7, a reduction in the valuation allowance associated
with the realization of pre-emergence deferred tax assets in future periods
will sequentially reduce the value of recorded goodwill followed by other
indefinite-lived assets until the net carrying cost of these assets is
zero. Adjustments to goodwill during the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 are shown in the table below:
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Balance as of
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
6,034,609
|
|
Impairment
charge
|
|
(3,917,414
|
)
|
Adjustments
related to deferred tax assets
|
|
74,013
|
|
Other
|
|
8,020
|
|
Balance as of
March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
2,199,228
|
|
Note 5 Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157,
Fair
Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157), on the Effective Date in
accordance with SOP 90-7. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
requires, among other things, the Companys valuation techniques used to
measure fair value to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the
use of unobservable inputs. This standard was applied prospectively to
the valuation of assets and liabilities on and after the Effective Date.
There
are three general valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value,
as described below:
(A)
Market approach Uses prices and other
relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or
comparable assets or liabilities;
(B)
Cost approach Based on the amount that
currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement
cost); and
(C)
Income approach Uses valuation techniques to
convert future amounts to a single present amount based on current market
expectations about the future amounts (includes present value techniques,
option-pricing models, and excess earnings method). Net present value is an income approach where
a stream of expected cash flows is discounted at an appropriate market interest
rate. Excess earnings method is a
variation of the income approach where the value of a specific asset is isolated
from its contributory assets.
10
Measured on a Recurring Basis.
For
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the
period, SFAS No. 157 requires quantitative disclosures about the fair
value measurements separately for each major category. There were no changes in the valuation
techniques used to measure the fair values of assets measured on a recurring
basis during the period. Assets and
liabilities itemized below were measured at fair value on a recurring basis
during the period using the market and income approaches:
|
|
Successor Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
As of
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Valuation
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
2007
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
Technique
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,187
|
|
$
|
3,187
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
2,939
|
|
$
|
2,939
|
|
$
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
Unrestricted
short-term investments
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
95
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(A),(C)
|
|
Restricted cash,
cash equivalents, and short-term investments
|
|
484
|
|
479
|
|
5
|
|
725
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
(A),(C)
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
(A),(C)
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,752
|
|
$
|
3,666
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
$
|
3,819
|
|
$
|
3,759
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
As of
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Inputs
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Valuation
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
2007
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
Technique
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
(A),(C)
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
Measured on
a Non-Recurring Basis.
For assets and liabilities measured on a
non-recurring basis during the period, SFAS No. 157 requires quantitative
disclosures about the fair value measurements separately for each major
category. The Company impaired certain aircraft, engines and inventory during
the first quarter of 2008 related to the planned early retirement of certain
Boeing 747F and DC9-30 aircraft, as described further in Note 12 Aircraft
Impairments. The losses related to these impairments were recorded in
depreciation and amortization on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations based on the fair value of the impaired assets.
The Company also recorded a
goodwill impairment charge in other operating expense to reduce the book value
of Northwests equity to its implied fair value as of the Merger announcement
date. The goodwill measurement is an
estimate and will be adjusted based on the completion of Step 2 of the goodwill
impairment test during the second quarter, as described more fully in Note 4
Goodwill and Intangibles. The assets
itemized below were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the
period using a market approach:
|
|
Successor Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Month of
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Gains
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Measurement
|
|
Measurement
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
Flight equipment
spare parts
|
|
March 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Flight
equipment, net
|
|
March 2008
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
March 2008
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
(3,917
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,934
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Note 6 Geographic Regions
The
Company is managed as one cohesive business unit, of which revenues are derived
primarily from the commercial transportation of passengers and cargo. Operating revenues from flight segments
serving a foreign destination are classified into the Pacific or Atlantic
regions, as appropriate. The following
table shows the operating revenues for each region:
|
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended March 31,
|
|
Three Months
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
2,089
|
|
$
|
1,942
|
|
Pacific,
principally Japan
|
|
668
|
|
638
|
|
Atlantic
|
|
370
|
|
293
|
|
Total operating
revenues
|
|
$
|
3,127
|
|
$
|
2,873
|
|
The
Companys tangible assets consist primarily of flight equipment, which are
utilized across geographic markets and therefore have not been allocated.
Note
7 Reorganization Related Items
In accordance with SOP 90-7, the condensed
consolidated financial statements for the Predecessor period distinguish
transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization
from the ongoing operations of the Company.
In connection with our bankruptcy proceedings, the Company recorded the
following largely non-cash reorganization income/(expense) items:
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2007
|
|
Regional carrier
claims
|
|
$
|
(362
|
)
|
Employee-related
charges
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Abandonment of
aircraft and buildings
|
|
(48
|
)
|
Restructured
aircraft lease/debt charges
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Professional
fees
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Other
|
|
40
|
|
Reorganization
items, net
|
|
$
|
(393
|
)
|
Reorganization items recorded during the
three months ended March 31, 2007 largely consisted of charges associated
with the Companys implementation of an amended Airline Services Agreement with
Pinnacle Airlines, Inc., charges associated with the Companys Stock
Purchase and Reorganization Agreement with Mesaba Aviation, Inc.,
abandonment of aircraft and buildings, and professional fees.
Note 8 Income Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
using enacted tax rates, for the tax effect of temporary differences between
the financial reporting and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 109 also requires that deferred
tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not
that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Based on the consideration of all available
evidence, the Company has provided a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
recorded beginning in the first quarter 2003.
The Company continues to maintain a full valuation allowance against its
deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty regarding the ultimate realization
of those assets.
An
ownership change under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 occurred in
connection with the Companys bankruptcy Plan of Reorganization. However, the Company does not believe that
such change has any material impact on the Companys ability to use its NOL
carryforwards and other tax attributes.
The Company did not record a
tax benefit related to our reported first quarter 2008 net loss; to record a
tax benefit, the Company would be required to have a high degree of confidence
that it would record a full year profit.
12
Note 9 Earnings (Loss) Per Share Data
Successor EPS
. In
accordance with SFAS No. 128,
Earnings
per Share
(SFAS No. 128), basic and diluted earnings per
share were computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of
shares of common stock outstanding for the three months ended March 31,
2008. SFAS No. 128 requires that
the entire 234 million shares to be issued to holders of unsecured and guaranty
claims pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization be considered outstanding for
purposes of calculating earnings per share as these shares will ultimately be
issued to unsecured creditors once the allocation of disputed unsecured claims
is completed.
At
March 31, 2008, approximately 16 million in restricted stock units and
stock options to purchase shares of the Successor Companys common stock were
outstanding but excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share
because the effect of including the shares would have been anti-dilutive.
Predecessor EPS.
Predecessor
basic and diluted earnings per share were computed based on the Predecessors
final weighted-average shares outstanding.
For the three months ended
March 31, 2007, approximately 19 million incremental shares related to dilutive
securities were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation
because the Company reported a net loss for this period.
Additionally,
approximately 6 million shares of Series C Preferred Stock were excluded
from the effect of dilutive securities for the three months ended March 31,
2007 because the Company reported a net loss for this period.
At March 31, 2007, employee stock options
to purchase approximately 7 million shares were outstanding but not included in
diluted securities because the Company reported a net loss for the three months
ended March 31, 2007.
13
Note 10
-
Long-Term Debt
As of March 31, 2008, maturities of long-term debt, excluding
capital lease obligations, through December 31, 2012 were as follows (in
millions):
remainder of
|
2008
|
|
$
|
355
|
|
|
2009
|
|
598
|
|
|
2010
|
|
445
|
|
|
2011
|
|
620
|
|
|
2012
|
|
452
|
|
On August 21, 2006, the Predecessor Company entered into a $1.225
billion Senior Corporate Credit Facility (Bank Credit Facility), formerly
called the DIP/Exit Facility, consisting of a $1.05 billion term loan facility
and a $175 million revolving credit facility which has been fully drawn since
the inception of the Bank Credit Facility.
The final maturity date of the Bank Credit Facility is August 21,
2013. Principal on the term loan portion
of the Bank Credit Facility will be repaid at 1.0% per year with the balance
(94%) due at maturity. The first such
principal repayment was made on August 21, 2007. Loans drawn under the $175 million revolving
credit facility may be borrowed and repaid at the Companys discretion. Up to $75 million of the revolving credit
facility may be utilized by the Company as a letter of credit facility. As amended in March 2007, both loan
facilities under the Bank Credit Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus
2.00%. Letter of credit fees will be
charged at the same credit spread as on the borrowings plus 12.5 basis points. To the extent that the revolving credit
facility is not utilized, the Company is required to pay an undrawn commitment
fee of 50 basis points per annum. The
Bank Credit Facility received a credit rating of BB from Standard &
Poors Rating Services (S&P) and a Ba3 from Moodys Investors Service, Inc.
(Moodys) and is secured by a first lien on the Companys Pacific Route
authorities. The March 2007
amendment also allowed the Company to grant pari-passu liens in the Pacific
Route authorities to secure up to $150 million of exposure arising from hedging
trades entered into with Bank Credit Facility lenders. The interest rate as of March 31, 2008
was 4.87% on both the term loan facility and the revolving credit facility.
The Bank Credit Facility
requires ongoing compliance with financial covenants requiring the Company to
maintain unrestricted cash of at least $750 million, a collateral coverage
ratio of at least 1.50 to 1.0 and a minimum ratio of EBITDAR to consolidated
fixed charges (Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio).
Under a recent amendment to the Bank Credit Facility completed in April 2008,
compliance by the Company with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio has been waived
from April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2009 and thereafter is
determined as set forth below:
Number of
|
|
|
|
Required
|
Months Covered
|
|
Period Ending
|
|
Coverage Ratio
|
Three
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
1.00
to 1.0
|
Six
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
1.10
to 1.0
|
Nine
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
1.20
to 1.0
|
Twelve
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
1.30
to 1.0
|
Twelve
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
1.40
to 1.0
|
Twelve
|
|
September 30, 2010 and
each quarter ending thereafter
|
|
1.50
to 1.0
|
For purposes of calculating
this ratio, EBITDAR is defined as operating income, adjusted to exclude the
effects of depreciation, amortization, aircraft rents and costs (including up
to $150 million of cash costs) payable in connection with a merger or
acquisition to include the effects of interest income and governmental
reimbursements for losses resulting from developments affecting the aviation
industry. Earnings also exclude
non-recurring non-cash charges (subject to the inclusion of any cash payments
then or thereafter made with respect thereto) and are determined without giving
effect to any acceleration of rental expense.
Fixed charges are defined as interest expense (excluding fees and
expenses in connection with the recent amendment) and aircraft rent expense
(net of certain aircraft sub-lease rental income and without giving effect to
any acceleration of rental expense).
Although the Company was in
compliance with all required financial covenants as of March 31, 2008, continued
compliance depends on many factors, some of which are beyond the Companys
control, including the overall industry revenue environment and the level of
fuel costs.
14
Note 11
Fleet Information and Commitments
As shown in the following table, Northwest operated
a mainline fleet of 348 aircraft at March 31, 2008, consisting of 288
narrow-body and 60 wide-body aircraft.
Northwests purchase commitments for aircraft as of March 31, 2008
are also provided.
|
|
|
|
In Service
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
|
|
Seating
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
on Firm
|
|
Aircraft Type
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Owned
|
|
Lease
|
|
Lease
|
|
Total
|
|
Order
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger
Aircraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airbus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A319
|
|
124
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
57
|
|
5
|
|
A320
|
|
148
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
73
|
|
2
|
|
A330-200
|
|
243
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
A330-300
|
|
298
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787-8
|
|
TBD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
757-200
|
|
160-184
|
|
38
|
|
1
|
|
16
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
757-300
|
|
224
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
747-400
|
|
403
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
McDonnell
Douglas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DC9
|
|
100-125
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
1
|
|
58
|
|
336
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freighter
Aircraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing 747F
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Mainline Operated Aircraft
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
1
|
|
61
|
|
348
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional
Aircraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRJ200
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
Saab 340
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
CRJ900
|
|
76
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
17
|
|
Embraer 175
|
|
76
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Airlink Operated Aircraft
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
225
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Aircraft
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
1
|
|
251
|
|
573
|
|
61
|
|
T
he
Company took delivery of six
CRJ900 and eight Embraer 175
aircraft during the three months ended March 31, 2008. One Embraer 175 had not been placed in
service before March 31, 2008 and therefore is not included in the table
above. In connection with the
acquisition of these 14 aircraft,
the Company entered into long-term debt arrangements. Under such arrangements, the aggregate amount
of debt incurred totaled $246
million.
Note 12 Aircraft Impairments
In
March 2008, as part of a revised fleet plan, the Company determined that
it will remove three Boeing 747F aircraft and two DC9-30 aircraft from
scheduled service during the remainder of 2008 and the first quarter of
2009. As a result, the Company recorded,
as additional depreciation expense, impairment charges of $17.2 million
associated with these aircraft and related inventory during the first quarter
of 2008. In conjunction
with further announced capacity reductions during the remainder of 2008,
the Company may be required to record additional impairment charges as the
specific aircraft to be retired are identified.
In the first quarter of 2007, the Company recorded
$13.3 million related to the impairment of three owned aircraft which were
permanently removed from service. These
charges reflect the Companys decision to park three DC9-30 aircraft
permanently, consistent with the Companys ongoing review of its aircraft fleet
plan in conjunction with its overall route structure and capacity
requirements. The first quarter 2007 impairment
charges were recorded as reorganization expenses.
15
Note 13 Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the
following:
|
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,139
|
)
|
$
|
(292
|
)
|
Pension, other
postretirement, and long-term disabilities benefits
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
Reclassification
of gain (loss) from hedging activities
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
Change in
unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Comprehensive income
(loss)
|
|
$
|
(4,123
|
)
|
$
|
(291
|
)
|
Note 14 Pension and Other Postretirement Health Care
Benefits
The
Company has several defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution 401(k)-type plans covering substantially all
of its employees. Northwest froze future
benefit accruals for its defined benefit Pension Plans for Salaried Employees,
Pilot Employees, and Contract Employees effective August 31, 2005, January 31,
2006, and September 30, 2006, respectively. Replacement coverage was provided for these
employees through 401(k)-type defined contribution plans including the Pilot
Money Purchase Plan or, in the case of IAM represented employees, the IAM
National Multi-Employer Plan.
Northwest
also sponsors various contributory and noncontributory medical, dental and life
insurance benefit plans covering certain eligible retirees and their
dependents. The expected future cost of
providing such postretirement benefits is accrued over the service lives of
active employees. Retired employees are
not offered Company-paid medical and dental benefits after age 64, with the
exception of certain employees who retired prior to 1987 and receive lifetime
Company-paid medical and dental benefits.
Prior to age 65, the retiree share of the cost of medical and dental
coverage is based on a combination of years of service and age at
retirement. Medical and dental benefit
plans are unfunded and costs are paid as incurred. The pilot group is provided Company-paid
decreasing life insurance coverage.
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (2006 Pension Act) was signed into
law on August 17, 2006. The 2006
Pension Act allows commercial airlines to elect special funding rules for
defined benefit plans that are frozen.
The unfunded liability for a frozen defined benefit plan may be
amortized over a fixed 17-year period. The unfunded liability is defined as the
actuarial liability calculated using an 8.85% interest rate minus the fair
market value of plan assets. Northwest
elected the special funding rules for frozen defined benefit plans under
the 2006 Pension Act effective October 1, 2006. As a result of this election (1) the
funding waivers that Northwest received for the 2003 plan year contributions
were deemed satisfied under the 2006 Pension Act, and (2) the funding
standard account for each Plan had no deficiency as of September 30,
2006. New contributions that came due
under the 2006 Pension Act funding rules were paid while Northwest was in
bankruptcy and must continue to be paid going forward. If the new contributions are not paid, the
future funding deficiency that would develop will be based on the regular
funding rules rather than the special funding rules.
Congress enacted, and the president signed into law on December 13,
2007, a change in the retirement age for pilots from age 60 to 65. Due to this legislative change, the Company
has updated its retirement assumptions for pilots and assumes that certain
pilots will continue to work past age 60. This change had an immaterial impact
on Northwests overall pension benefit and other postretirement obligations.
16
Components of net periodic benefit cost of defined
benefit plans and defined contribution plan costs:
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Defined benefit
plan costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
141
|
|
135
|
|
12
|
|
13
|
|
Expected return
on plan assets
|
|
(140
|
)
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of
prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Recognized net
actuarial loss and other events
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Net periodic
benefit cost
|
|
7
|
|
33
|
|
18
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
contribution plan costs
|
|
28
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefit
cost
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Note 15 Stock-Based Compensation
Prior
to the Effective Date, the Company maintained stock incentive plans for
officers and key employees of the Company (the Prior Management Plans) and a
stock option plan for pilot employees (the Pilot Plan). On the Effective Date, outstanding awards
under the Prior Management Plans and Pilot Plan were cancelled in accordance
with the terms of the Plan. On the
Effective Date, the Management Equity Plan (the 2007 Plan) of the Successor
Company provided for in the Plan of Reorganization became effective. The 2007 Plan is a stock-based incentive
compensation plan, under which the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors has the authority to grant equity-based awards including stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units,
and/or other stock-based awards, including performance-based awards. Each of these awards may be granted alone, in
conjunction with, or in tandem with other awards under the 2007 Plan. Awards may be to any employee of the Company
or its subsidiaries. The number of
participants participating in the 2007 Plan will vary from year to year. At its inception, the 2007 Plan provided that
21.3 million shares of common stock of the Successor Company were available for
issuance under the plan. As of March 31,
2008, approximately 6.0 million shares remained available for new awards to be
granted under the 2007 Plan.
The total stock-based non-cash compensation
expense related to stock-based plans and liability awards for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 was $31.9 million and $0.5 million,
respectively. There was no corresponding
tax benefit in 2008 related to the stock-based compensation, as the Company
records a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets due to the
uncertainty regarding the ultimate realization of those assets. See Note 8 Income Taxes for additional
information.
Note 16 Subsequent Events
Merger Announcement.
On April 14,
2008, the Company and Delta entered into the Merger Agreement that provides,
among other things, for the Company to be merged with a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Delta (the Merger).
Consummation of the Merger is subject to
customary closing conditions, including shareholder approval by holders of
common stock of NWA Corp. and Delta and receiving certain domestic and foreign
regulatory and antitrust approvals (including from the Federal Aviation
Administration and the United States Department of Transportation, under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and pursuant
to Council Regulation (EEC) 139/2004 of the European Commission). The Merger Agreement contains certain
termination rights for both NWA Corp. and Delta. The Merger Agreement further provides that,
upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, the
Company may be required to pay to Delta, or Delta may be required to pay to the
Company, a termination fee of $165 million.
Under
the terms of the Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of the Companys common
stock will be converted into the right to receive 1.25 shares of Delta common
stock. Stock options and other equity
awards granted under the Companys 2007 Management Equity Plan will convert
into stock options and equity awards with respect to Delta common stock, after
giving effect to the exchange ratio.
17
Certain
contracts, employee benefit arrangements and debt instruments of the Company
contain change in control provisions that may be triggered by the Merger,
resulting in changes to the terms or settlement amounts of the contracts,
arrangements or instruments.
We
currently expect the Merger to close by the end of 2008. However, factors outside of our control could
require us to complete the Merger at a later time or not to complete it at all.
18
Item 2. Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
On September 14, 2005 (the Petition Date),
NWA Corp. and 12 of its direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the Debtors)
filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court).
Subsequently, on September 30, 2005, NWA Aircraft Finance, Inc.,
an indirect subsidiary of NWA Corp., also filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11. On May 18, 2007,
the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving and confirming the Debtors
First Amended Joint and Consolidated Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (as confirmed, the Plan or Plan of Reorganization). The Plan became effective and the Debtors
emerged from bankruptcy protection on May 31, 2007 (the Effective Date).
On the Effective Date, the Company implemented
fresh-start reporting in accordance with SOP 90-7. Thus the consolidated financial statements
prior to June 1, 2007 reflect results based upon the historical cost basis
of the Company while the post-emergence consolidated financial statements
reflect the new basis of accounting incorporating the fair value adjustments
made in recording the effects of fresh-start reporting. Therefore, the post-emergence periods are not
comparable to the pre-emergence periods.
However, for discussions on the results of operations, the Company
believes that comparisons of financial results between the post-emergence and
pre-emergence periods provide management and investors with a better
perspective of the Companys core business and on-going operational financial
performance and trends.
Merger Announcement.
On April 14, 2008, the Company and Delta
Air Lines, Inc. (Delta) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger
(the Merger Agreement) that provides, among other things, for the Company to
be merged with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Delta (the Merger).
Consummation of the Merger is subject to
customary closing conditions, including shareholder approval by holders of
common stock of NWA Corp. and Delta and receiving certain domestic and foreign
regulatory and antitrust approvals (including from the Federal Aviation
Administration and the United States Department of Transportation, under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and pursuant
to Council Regulation (EEC) 139/2004 of the European Commission). The Merger Agreement contains certain
termination rights for both NWA Corp. and Delta. The Merger Agreement further provides that,
upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, the
Company may be required to pay to Delta, or Delta may be required to pay to the
Company, a termination fee of $165 million.
Under
the terms of the Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of the Companys
common stock will be converted into the right to receive 1.25 shares of Delta
common stock. Stock options and other
equity awards granted under the Companys 2007 Management Equity Plan will
convert into stock options and equity awards with respect to Delta common
stock, after giving effect to the exchange ratio.
Certain
contracts, employee benefit arrangements and debt instruments of the Company
contain change in control provisions that may be triggered by the Merger,
resulting in changes to the terms or settlement amounts of the contracts,
arrangements or instruments.
We
currently expect the Merger to close by the end of 2008. However, factors outside of our control could
require us to complete the Merger at a later time or not to complete it at all.
First
Quarter 2008 Results
For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the
Company recorded a net loss of $4.1 billion.
This compares to a first quarter 2007 net loss of $292 million. Excluding aircraft and inventory impairment
charges of $17.2 million and goodwill impairment charges of $3.9 billion,
respectively, the Company reported a net loss of $205 million during the first
quarter of 2008. Excluding
reorganization expense items of $393 million, the Company reported a 2007 first
quarter net profit of $101 million.
Operating revenues in the first quarter increased
8.8 percent versus the first quarter of 2007 to $3.1 billion. System consolidated passenger revenue
increased 6.2 percent primarily due to a 4.1 percent improvement in unit
revenue. Excluding the impact of
fresh-start accounting, system consolidated passenger revenue increased 7.1 percent
primarily due to a 5.0 percent improvement in unit revenue.
19
Operating expenses in the first quarter increased
$4.5 billion versus the first quarter of 2007.
Aircraft
fuel and taxes increased 58.2 percent compared with the first quarter of 2007,
primarily due to an increase in price.
During the first quarter, mainline fuel averaged $2.77 per gallon,
excluding taxes and mark-to-market losses related to future period fuel
derivative contracts, a 49.7 percent increase over the prior year. Additionally, the Company recorded, as
additional depreciation expense, impairment charges of $17.2 million associated
with three Boeing 747F aircraft and two DC9-30 aircraft and related
inventory. The Company also recorded a
non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $3.9 billion to reduce the book value of
Northwests equity to its implied fair value as of the Merger announcement
date.
At
March 31, 2008, the Company
had cash and cash equivalents of $3.2 billion, unrestricted short-term
investments of $40 million, and borrowing capacity under an undrawn credit
facility of $117 million, providing total available liquidity of $3.3 billion. This
amount excludes $484 million of restricted short-term investments (which may
include amounts held as cash).
REPORTED
NET INCOME (LOSS) EXCLUDING IMPAIRMENT CHARGES AND REORGANIZATION EXPENSE
ITEMS
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended March 31,
|
|
Three Months
Ended March 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Net income
(loss) (as reported)
|
|
$
|
(4,139
|
)
|
$
|
(292
|
)
|
Excluding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reorganization
items, net
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
|
3,917
|
|
|
|
Aircraft-related
impairments
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) excluding impairment charges and reorganization expense items
|
|
$
|
(205
|
)
|
$
|
101
|
|
20
Operating
Statistics Three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
Information
with respect to the Companys operating statistics follows:
PASSENGER
AND REGIONAL CARRIER REVENUES AND STATISTICAL RESULTS
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Change
|
|
Scheduled
service - Consolidated: (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available seat
miles (ASM) (millions)
|
|
23,359
|
|
22,893
|
|
2.0
|
|
Revenue
passenger miles (RPM) (millions)
|
|
19,214
|
|
18,618
|
|
3.2
|
|
Passenger load
factor
|
|
82.3
|
%
|
81.3
|
%
|
1.0
|
|
Revenue
passengers (millions)
|
|
15.9
|
|
15.6
|
|
1.9
|
|
Passenger
revenue per RPM (yield)
|
|
13.78
|
¢
|
13.39
|
¢
|
2.9
|
|
Passenger
revenue per ASM (RASM)
|
|
11.34
|
¢
|
10.89
|
¢
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel
gallons consumed - Consolidated
(millions) (1)
|
|
420
|
|
419
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled
service - Mainline: (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available seat
miles (ASM) (millions)
|
|
21,144
|
|
21,252
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Revenue
passenger miles (RPM) (millions)
|
|
17,621
|
|
17,492
|
|
0.7
|
|
Passenger load
factor
|
|
83.3
|
%
|
82.3
|
%
|
1.0
|
|
Revenue
passengers (millions)
|
|
12.3
|
|
12.9
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
Passenger
revenue per RPM (yield)
|
|
12.71
|
¢
|
12.59
|
¢
|
1.0
|
|
Passenger
revenue per ASM (RASM)
|
|
10.59
|
¢
|
10.36
|
¢
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel
gallons consumed - Mainline
(millions) (2)
|
|
367
|
|
378
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
(1)
Consolidated statistics include Northwest Airlink regional carriers.
(2)
Mainline
statistics exclude Northwest Airlink regional carriers, which is consistent
with how the Company reports statistics to the Department of Transportation (DOT).
21
MAINLINE
OPERATING STATISTICAL RESULTS (1)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Change
|
|
Total operating
ASM (millions)
|
|
21,269
|
|
21,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger
service operating expense per total ASM (2) (3)
|
|
12.24
|
¢
|
10.32
|
¢
|
18.6
|
|
Mainline fuel
expense per total ASM
|
|
4.54
|
¢
|
2.95
|
¢
|
53.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market
gains (losses) per total ASM related to fuel derivative contracts that settle
in future periods
|
|
(0.04
|
)
¢
|
0.13
|
¢
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mainline fuel
expense per total ASM, excluding mark-to-market gains (losses) related to
fuel derivative contracts that settle in future periods
|
|
4.50
|
¢
|
3.08
|
¢
|
46.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cargo ton miles
(millions)
|
|
458
|
|
457
|
|
0.2
|
|
Cargo revenue
per ton mile
|
|
43.10
|
¢
|
41.40
|
¢
|
4.1
|
|
Fuel gallons
consumed (millions)
|
|
367
|
|
378
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
Average fuel
cost per gallon, excluding taxes
|
|
279.74
|
¢
|
177.13
|
¢
|
57.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market
gains (losses) per fuel gallons consumed related to fuel derivative contracts
that settle in future periods
|
|
(3.20
|
)
¢
|
7.57
|
¢
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average fuel
cost per gallon, excluding fuel taxes and mark-to-market gains related to
fuel derivative contracts that settle in future periods
|
|
276.54
|
¢
|
184.70
|
¢
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
operating aircraft at end of period
|
|
348
|
|
375
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
Full-time
equivalent employees at end of period
|
|
30,053
|
|
30,008
|
|
0.1
|
|
(1)
Mainline statistics exclude Northwest Airlink regional carriers, which is
consistent with how the Company reports statistics to the DOT.
(2)
This financial measure excludes non-passenger service expenses. The Company believes that providing financial
measures directly related to passenger service operations allows investors to
evaluate and compare the Companys core operating results to those of the
industry.
(3)
Passenger service operating expense excludes the following items
unrelated to passenger service operations, net of eliminations where
applicable:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
|
$
|
3,917
|
|
$
|
|
|
Regional carrier
expenses
|
|
413
|
|
274
|
|
Freighter
operations
|
|
182
|
|
134
|
|
MLT Inc.
|
|
44
|
|
55
|
|
Other
|
|
19
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Results of Operations Three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
Operating
Revenues
. Operating revenues increased
8.8% ($254 million), the result of increased regional carrier revenues, system
passenger revenue, charter revenue, and other revenue.
System Passenger Revenues.
In the following analysis by region, mainline
statistics exclude Northwest Airlink regional carriers, which is consistent
with how the Company reports statistics to the DOT. On the Effective Date, in conjunction with
implementing fresh-start reporting, the Company changed its policies pertaining
to the accounting for frequent flyer obligations. Frequent flyer obligations are now recognized
on a deferred revenue method versus an incremental cost method. The impact of the changes to accounting for
frequent flyer obligations on the Successor Company was a reduction of $26.0
million in mainline passenger revenue and an increase of $3.8 million in
regional carrier revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The following analysis by region outlines the
Companys performance as reported and excluding fresh-start related changes:
|
|
Mainline
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Pacific
|
|
Atlantic
|
|
Mainline
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
As reported:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger
revenues (in millions)
|
|
$
|
1,392
|
|
$
|
539
|
|
$
|
308
|
|
$
|
2,239
|
|
$
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease) from 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger
revenues (in millions)
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
$
|
24
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
Percent
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
4.7
|
%
|
13.2
|
%
|
1.7
|
%
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled
service ASMs (capacity)
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
16.4
|
%
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
2.0
|
%
|
Scheduled
service RPMs (traffic)
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
11.3
|
%
|
0.7
|
%
|
3.2
|
%
|
Passenger load
factor
|
|
2.5
|
pts.
|
0.7
|
pts.
|
(3.6
|
)pts.
|
1.0
|
pts.
|
1.0
|
pts.
|
Yield
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
6.6
|
%
|
1.7
|
%
|
0.9
|
%
|
2.9
|
%
|
Passenger RASM
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
7.5
|
%
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
2.2
|
%
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding
fresh-start related changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger
revenues (in millions)
|
|
$
|
1,396
|
|
$
|
557
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
$
|
2,265
|
|
$
|
2,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease) from 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passenger
revenues (in millions)
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
$
|
42
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
Percent
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
8.2
|
%
|
14.7
|
%
|
2.9
|
%
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
10.1
|
%
|
3.1
|
%
|
2.1
|
%
|
3.8
|
%
|
Passenger RASM
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
11.0
|
%
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
3.4
|
%
|
5.0
|
%
|
Regional Carrier Revenues
. Regional carrier revenues
increased 40.4 percent ($118 million) to $410 million primarily due to a 34.9
percent increase in available seat miles, resulting in a 4.1 percent
improvement in unit revenue.
Cargo Revenues
. Cargo revenues increased 4.8
percent ($9 million) to $198 million due primarily to a 4.1 percent improvement
in yield.
Other Revenues.
Other
revenues increased 47.4 percent ($90 million) due to increased charter and
partner revenues, and the portion of payments received from non-airline
marketing partners for frequent flyer miles that is now recorded in Other
Revenues.
23
Operating Expenses
. Operating expenses increased
$4.5 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the
three months ended March 31, 2007.
As a result of the adoption of fresh-start reporting, the Companys
financial statements on or after June 1, 2007 are not comparable with its
pre-emergence financial statements because they are, in effect, those of a new
entity. The effects of fresh-start
reporting and the impact of exit-related stock compensation expense on the
Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are itemized in
column (1). During the first quarter of
2008, the Company recorded impairment charges associated with aircraft and
goodwill, the impacts are itemized in column (2). On April 24, 2007,
Mesaba Aviation, Inc. was acquired by the Company and became a
wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary, the impact of which is itemized in column
(3). Excluding the items described
above, the comparable year-over-year operating performance variances are
itemized in column (4). The following
table and notes present operating expenses for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007 and describe significant year-over-year variances:
|
|
Successor
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due To:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
Three
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
Months
|
|
Fresh-Start/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
Exit-Related
|
|
|
|
Mesaba
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Stock Comp
|
|
Impairment
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
Percent
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Expense
|
|
Charges
|
|
Elimination
|
|
Operations
|
|
Note
|
|
from 2007
|
|
Change
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel and
taxes
|
|
$
|
1,114
|
|
$
|
704
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
$
|
409
|
|
A
|
|
$
|
410
|
|
58.2
|
%
|
Salaries, wages
and benefits
|
|
670
|
|
615
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
12
|
|
B
|
|
55
|
|
8.9
|
|
Aircraft
maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
materials and
repairs
|
|
221
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
27
|
|
C
|
|
37
|
|
20.1
|
|
Selling and
marketing
|
|
193
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
D
|
|
2
|
|
1.0
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
148
|
|
121
|
|
(2
|
)
|
17
|
|
2
|
|
10
|
|
D
|
|
27
|
|
22.3
|
|
Other rentals and
landing fees
|
|
138
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
(8
|
)
|
D
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Aircraft rentals
|
|
93
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
D
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(3.1
|
)
|
Regional carrier
expenses
|
|
205
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
48
|
|
E
|
|
(6
|
)
|
(2.8
|
)
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
|
3,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
F
|
|
3,917
|
|
n/m
|
|
Other
|
|
481
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
61
|
|
G
|
|
72
|
|
17.6
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
$
|
7,180
|
|
$
|
2,672
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
3,934
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,508
|
|
168.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Aircraft fuel and taxes increased due to a 49.7 percent increase in the
average mainline fuel cost per gallon, excluding fuel taxes and mark-to-market
adjustments related to fuel derivative contracts that will settle in future
periods. During the first quarter of
2008, we recognized $5.3 million of net fuel derivative gains as reductions in
fuel expense, including $12.3 million of unrealized losses related to fuel
derivative contracts that will settle during the remainder of 2008.
B.
Salaries, wages and benefits were relatively flat year-over-year after
the effects of fresh-start reporting, exit-related stock compensation expense
and the consolidation of Mesaba.
C.
Aircraft maintenance materials and repairs increased largely due to
increased engine repairs.
D.
Selling and marketing expense, depreciation and amortization, other
rentals and landing fees and aircraft rentals were relatively flat
year-over-year. See
Item 1.
Financial Statements, Note 12
Aircraft Impairments for information pertaining to aircraft-related
impairments recorded during the first quarter.
E.
Regional carrier expenses increased primarily due to higher fuel costs.
F.
During the first quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a non-cash
goodwill impairment charge to reduce the book value of Northwests equity to
its implied fair value as of the Merger announcement date. See Note 4 - Goodwill and Intangibles for
additional information.
G.
Other expenses (which include MLT operating expenses, outside services,
insurance, passenger food, personnel expenses, communication expenses and
supplies) were higher versus prior year largely due to an increase in outside
services with the shift to third party vendors versus internally staffed
station operations. Increased personnel
expenses and supplies also contributed to the variance.
Other Income and Expense.
Non-operating expense decreased 82.6% ($408 million)
year-over-year primarily due to the Companys emergence from bankruptcy thus
eliminating reorganization expenses. See
Item 1. Financial Statements, Note 7 Reorganization Related Items for
additional information related to reorganization items.
Tax Expense (Benefit).
Given recent loss experience, the Company
provides a valuation allowance against tax benefits, principally for net
operating losses in excess of its deferred tax liability. It is more likely than not that future
deferred tax assets will require a valuation allowance to be recorded to fully
reserve against the uncertainty that those assets would be realized. See Item 1. Financial Statements, Note 8
Income Taxes for additional discussion of the Companys tax accounts.
24
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At
March 31, 2008, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $3.2 billion,
unrestricted short-term investments of $40 million, and borrowing capacity
under an undrawn credit facility of $117 million, providing total available
liquidity of $3.3 billion. This amount excludes $484 million of
restricted short-term investments (which may include amounts held as cash).
Cash Flows.
Liquidity increased by $209
million during the three months ended March 31, 2008, primarily due to net
cash provided by operating activities.
Operating Activities.
Net cash provided by operating
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $362 million,
which compares with $634 million of cash provided by operating activities for
the three months ended March 31, 2007.
The decrease in year-over-year net cash provided by operations was
primarily due to reduced net income in 2008 and the 2007 increase in operating
cash flows due to the release of bankruptcy-related vendor holdbacks.
Investing Activities.
Investing activities during the
three months ended March 31, 2008 included the contribution of $213
million for a minority ownership interest in Midwest Air Partners, LLC which in
turn purchased Midwest Air Group, Inc. during the quarter and the purchase
of six CRJ900 and eight Embraer 175 aircraft and other related costs. Other
related costs included engine purchases, costs to commission aircraft before
entering revenue service, deposits on ordered aircraft, facility improvements
and ground equipment purchases.
Additionally, during the three months ended March 31, 2008, the
Company had decreases in restricted cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments, proceeds from the sales of short-term investments and sold its Class A
Preferred share to Pinnacle for a purchase price of $20 million. Investing activities for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 included increases in the Companys restricted cash,
cash equivalents and short-term investments balances due to additional funding
of the Companys irrevocable tax trust, and proceeds from the International
Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) claim sale which were
distributed to employees in April of 2007 as well as the purchase of two
A330-300 and other related costs.
Financing Activities.
Financing
activities during the three months ended March 31, 2008 consisted
primarily of the financing of six CRJ900 and eight Embraer 175 aircraft with
long-term debt and scheduled debt payments.
Financing
activities in the three months ended March 31,
2007 consisted primarily of scheduled debt payments.
The Company also
financed the delivery of two Airbus A330-300 aircraft during the three months
ended March 31, 2007 through non-cash transactions with the manufacturer,
which are reflected as long-term debt on the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets, but are not classified as a cash flow activity. In connection with the acquisition of these
aircraft, the Company entered into long-term debt arrangements. Under these arrangements, the aggregate
amount of debt incurred totaled approximately $167 million.
Investing activities affecting cash flows and
non-cash financing transactions related to the initial acquisition of aircraft
consisted of the following for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007:
|
|
Investing Activities
Affecting Cash
Flows
|
|
Non-cash Financing
Transactions
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airbus
A330-300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
CRJ900
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embraer
175
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
25
Debt
. Maturities of long-term debt, excluding
capital lease obligations, through December 31, 2012, are as follows (in
millions):
remainder of 2008
|
|
$
|
355
|
|
2009
|
|
598
|
|
2010
|
|
445
|
|
2011
|
|
620
|
|
2012
|
|
452
|
|
On August 21, 2006, the Predecessor Company entered into a $1.225
billion Senior Corporate Credit Facility (Bank Credit Facility), formerly
called the DIP/Exit Facility, consisting of a $1.05 billion term loan facility
and a $175 million revolving credit facility which has been fully drawn since
the inception of the Bank Credit Facility.
The final maturity date of the Bank Credit Facility is August 21,
2013. Principal on the term loan portion
of the Bank Credit Facility will be repaid at 1.0% per year with the balance
(94%) due at maturity. The first such
principal repayment was made on August 21, 2007. Loans drawn under the $175 million revolving
credit facility may be borrowed and repaid at the Companys discretion. Up to $75 million of the revolving credit
facility may be utilized by the Company as a letter of credit facility. As amended in March 2007, both loan
facilities under the Bank Credit Facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.00%. Letter of credit fees will be charged at the
same credit spread as on the borrowings plus 12.5 basis points. To the extent that the revolving credit
facility is not utilized, the Company is required to pay an undrawn commitment
fee of 50 basis points per annum. The
Bank Credit Facility received a credit rating of BB from Standard &
Poors Rating Services (S&P) and a Ba3 from Moodys Investors Service, Inc.
(Moodys) and is secured by a first lien on the Companys Pacific Route
authorities. The March 2007
amendment also allowed the Company to grant pari-passu liens in the Pacific
Route authorities to secure up to $150 million of exposure arising from hedging
trades entered into with Bank Credit Facility lenders. The interest rate as of March 31, 2008
was 4.87% on both the term loan facility and the revolving credit facility.
The Bank Credit Facility
requires ongoing compliance with financial covenants requiring the Company to
maintain unrestricted cash of at least $750 million, a collateral coverage
ratio of at least 1.50 to 1.0 and a minimum ratio of EBITDAR to consolidated
fixed charges (Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio).
Under a recent amendment to the Bank Credit Facility completed in April 2008,
compliance by the Company with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio has been waived
from April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2009 and thereafter is
determined as set forth below:
Number of
|
|
|
|
Required
|
|
Months Covered
|
|
Period Ending
|
|
Coverage Ratio
|
|
Three
|
|
June 30, 2009.
|
|
1.00 to 1.0
|
|
Six
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
1.10 to 1.0
|
|
Nine
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
1.20 to 1.0
|
|
Twelve
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
1.30 to 1.0
|
|
Twelve
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
1.40 to 1.0
|
|
Twelve
|
|
September 30, 2010 and each quarter ending
thereafter
|
|
1.50 to 1.0
|
|
For purposes of calculating
this ratio, EBITDAR is defined as operating income, adjusted to exclude the
effects of depreciation, amortization, aircraft rents and costs (including up
to $150 million of cash costs) payable in connection with a merger or
acquisition to include the effects of interest income and governmental
reimbursements for losses resulting from developments affecting the aviation
industry. Earnings also exclude
non-recurring non-cash charges (subject to the inclusion of any cash payments
then or thereafter made with respect thereto) and are determined without giving
effect to any acceleration of rental expense.
Fixed charges are defined as interest expense (excluding fees and
expenses in connection with the recent amendment) and aircraft rent expense
(net of certain aircraft sub-lease rental income and without giving effect to
any acceleration of rental expense).
Although
the Company was in compliance with all required financial covenants as of March 31,
2008, continued compliance depends on many factors, some of which are beyond
the Companys control, including the overall industry revenue environment and
the level of fuel costs.
26
Aircraft Commitments.
Committed expenditures for aircraft and related
equipment, including estimated amounts for contractual price escalations and
predelivery deposits, will be approximately (in millions):
remainder of 2008
|
|
$
|
869
|
|
2009
|
|
374
|
|
2010
|
|
854
|
|
2011
|
|
282
|
|
2012
|
|
632
|
|
Pension Funding Obligations.
The Company has several defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution 401(k)-type plans
covering substantially all of its employees. Northwest froze future benefit
accruals for its defined benefit Pension Plans for Salaried Employees, Pilot
Employees, and Contract Employees effective August 31, 2005, January 31,
2006, and September 30, 2006, respectively. Replacement pension coverage
is provided for these employees through 401(k)-type defined contribution plans
including the Pilot Money Purchase Plan or, in the case of IAM represented
employees, the IAM National Multi-Employer Plan.
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (2006 Pension Act)
was signed into law on August 17, 2006. The 2006 Pension Act allows
commercial airlines to elect special funding rules for defined benefit
plans that are frozen. The unfunded liability for a frozen defined benefit plan
may be amortized over a fixed 17-year period. The unfunded liability is defined
as the actuarial liability calculated using an 8.85% interest rate minus the
fair market value of plan assets. Northwest elected the special funding rules for
frozen defined benefit plans under the 2006 Pension Act effective October 1,
2006. As a result of this election (1) the funding waivers that Northwest
received for the 2003 plan year contributions were deemed satisfied under the
2006 Pension Act, and (2) the funding
standard
account for each Plan had no deficiency as of September 30, 2006. New
contributions that came due under the 2006 Pension Act funding rules were
paid while Northwest was in bankruptcy and must continue to be paid going
forward. If the new contributions are not paid, the future funding deficiency
that would develop will be based on the regular funding rules rather than
the special funding rules.
It is Northwests policy to fund annually at least
the minimum contribution as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA).
Critical Accounting Estimates
Goodwill Impairment.
The Company tests the carrying amount of
goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets annually as of October 1
or whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.
Impairment testing is performed in accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS
No. 142). The Company is annually required to complete Step 1
(determining and comparing the fair value of the Companys reporting unit to
its carrying value) of the impairment test. Step 2 is required to be completed
if Step 1 indicates that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the
fair value and involves the calculation of the implied fair value of goodwill. Step
2 of the goodwill impairment test involves measuring the Companys other assets
and liabilities at fair value to calculate an implied fair value of goodwill
and measure the amount of impairment, if any.
In completing our first quarter evaluation, we considered the impact of
current high fuel prices, Northwests recent stock price, other industry trends
and the equity value of Northwest implied by the recent Merger announcement and
have determined that impairment to goodwill is required. To make this
determination, the Company compared the carrying value of its equity to its
fair value. For purposes of this evaluation, fair value has been determined
based on the implied market value of Northwests equity in the announced
transaction. As a result of this evaluation, the Company recorded a non-cash
goodwill impairment charge of $3.9 billion, or $14.94 per basic and diluted
share for the quarter ended, our best estimate of impairment as of the filing
date.
Due to the limited time available between the
announcement date and the Companys Form 10-Q filing date, there was
insufficient time to complete Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test and
calculate the implied fair value of goodwill as described in SFAS No. 142.
Once Step 2 of the goodwill impairment
test is completed during the second quarter, the amount of impairment recorded
could increase or decrease. See Item 1.
Financial Statements, Note 4 Goodwill and Intangibles for additional
information regarding the goodwill impairment.
The estimates and assumptions made in this valuation
are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and the resolution of
contingencies beyond the reasonable control of the Company. Accordingly, there
can be no assurance that the estimates, assumptions, and amounts reflected in
the valuations will be realized, and actual results could vary materially.
Moreover,
the market value of the Companys common stock may differ materially from the
equity valuation
.
27
Other Information
Foreign Currency.
The Company is exposed to the
effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on the U.S. dollar value
of foreign currency-denominated operating revenues and expenses. The Companys
largest exposure comes from the Japanese yen. From time to time, the Company
uses financial instruments to hedge its exposure to the Japanese yen. Hedging
gains or losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
until the associated transportation is provided, at which time they are
recognized as an increase or decrease in revenue. The Company hedged 8.6
billion yen of its yen-denominated sales during the three months ended March 31,
2008, resulting in an effective rate of 108.0 yen per U.S. dollar on exercised
options, the prevailing average contract rate for the period. The Company did
not hedge any of its yen-denominated sales during the three months ended March 31,
2007. The average market yen rate for the quarters ended March 31, 2008
and 2007 was 107.8 and 119.2, respectively.
On occasion, the Company uses forward contracts, collars
or put options to hedge a portion of its anticipated yen-denominated sales. The
changes in market value of such instruments have historically been highly
effective at offsetting exchange rate fluctuations in yen-denominated sales. As
of March 31, 2008, the Company had hedged approximately 47.6% of its
anticipated yen-denominated sales for the remainder of 2008 and 21.3% of its
anticipated 2009 yen-denominated sales. The 2008 Japanese yen hedges consist of
forward contracts which hedge approximately 37.9% of remaining yen-denominated
sales at an average rate of 109.3 yen per U.S. dollar and collar options which
hedge approximately 9.7% of remaining yen-denominated sales with a rate range
between 102.4 and 116.4 yen per U.S. dollar. The 2009 Japanese yen hedges
consist of forward contracts which hedge approximately 15.0% of its 2009
anticipated yen-denominated sales at an average rate of 98.6 yen per U.S.
dollar and collar options which hedge approximately 6.3% of remaining
yen-denominated sales with a rate range between 99.5 and 103.5 yen per U.S.
dollar. As of March 31, 2008, a $49.7 million unrealized loss was
outstanding in accumulated other comprehensive income associated with the
Japanese yen hedge contracts. The Company did not hedge any of its yen-denominated
sales during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and as of March 31,
2007 had no hedges in place for its remaining 2007 yen-denominated sales.
As of March 31, 2008, the Company had also
hedged approximately 66.2% of its remaining 2008 anticipated Canadian dollar
denominated sales with forward contracts at an average rate of 1.0009 Canadian
dollars per U.S. dollar. An $8.2 million unrealized gain was outstanding in
accumulated other comprehensive income associated with the Canadian dollar hedge
contracts, as of March 31, 2008. The Company did not hedge any of its
Canadian dollar denominated sales during the three months ended March 31,
2007 and as of March 31, 2007 had no hedges in place for its remaining
2007 Canadian dollar denominated sales. The average Canadian dollar to U.S.
dollar exchange rate for the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was
1.00 and 1.17, respectively.
Counterparties to these financial instruments expose
the Company to credit loss in the event of nonperformance, but the Company does
not expect any of the counterparties to fail to meet their obligations. The
amount of such credit exposure is generally the unrealized gains, if any, in
such contracts. To manage credit risks, the Company selects counterparties
based on credit ratings, limits exposure to any single counterparty and
monitors the market position with each counterparty. It is the Companys
practice to participate in foreign currency hedging transactions with a maximum
span of 24 months.
Aircraft Fuel.
The Company is
exposed to the effect of changes in the price and availability of aircraft fuel.
In order to provide a measure of control over price and supply, the Company
trades and ships fuel and maintains fuel storage facilities to support its
flight operations. To further manage the price risk of fuel costs, the Company
primarily utilizes futures contracts traded on regulated futures exchanges,
swap agreements and options.
As of March 31, 2008, the Company had
economically hedged the price of approximately 30% of its projected fuel
requirements for the remainder of 2008, through a combination of
crude oil collars and three-way collars. All of the Companys existing fuel
derivative contracts expire on or before December 31, 2008. The collars,
which hedge the price of approximately 22% of the Companys expected fuel
requirements for the remainder of 2008, provide upside protection beginning, on
average, with a crude oil equivalent price of $103.05 per barrel, and payment
obligations beginning, on average, with a crude oil equivalent price of $87.02
per barrel. The three-way collars, which hedge the price of approximately
8% of the Companys expected fuel requirements for the remainder of 2008,
provide upside protection beginning, on average, with a crude oil equivalent
price of $104.92 per barrel and capped, on average, at $118.92 per barrel, and
payment obligations beginning, on average, with a crude oil equivalent price of
$94.19 per barrel.
28
The Company currently has no fuel derivative
contracts outstanding that are designated for special hedge accounting
treatment, and therefore had no related unrealized gains (losses) in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of March 31, 2008. The
Company records any changes in the contracts values as mark-to-market
adjustments through the Consolidated Statement of Operations on a monthly basis.
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company recognized $5.3
million of net fuel derivative gains as reductions in fuel expense, including
$12.3 million of unrealized losses related to fuel derivative contracts that
will settle during the remainder of 2008. Effective June 2007, the Company
began allocating mark-to-market adjustments to regional carrier expense for
fuel consumed by our non-consolidated Airlink partners. For the three months
ended March 31, 2008, the Company recognized $0.5 million of fuel
derivative net gains as reductions in regional carrier expense, including $1.1
million of unrealized losses related to fuel derivative contracts that will
settle during the remainder of 2008.
As of March 31, 2007, the Company had hedged the
price of approximately 39% of its projected fuel requirements for the remainder
of 2007 through a combination of collar options and fixed price swap agreements.
The collar options, which hedged the price of approximately 29% of the Companys
projected fuel requirements for the remainder of 2007, consisted of crude oil
put options with a price range of $53 to $56.70 per barrel, and related call
options at a price of $72 per barrel. The fixed price crude oil swap
agreements, which hedged the price of approximately 10% of the Companys
projected fuel requirements for the remainder of 2007, included agreements with
a price range of $62 to $64.98 per barrel. Net gains of $22.6 million were
recorded as reductions in fuel expense during the three months ended March 31,
2007.
Interest
Rates.
The Companys earnings are
also affected by changes in interest rates due to the impact those changes have
on its interest expense from floating rate debt instruments. During June 2006,
the Company entered into individual interest rate cap hedges related to three
floating rate debt instruments, with a total cumulative notional amount of $429
million. Additionally, during February 2008, the Company entered into
individual interest rate swap hedges related to two floating rate debt
instruments, with a total cumulative notional amount of $928 million. The
objective of the interest rate cap and swap hedges is to protect the
anticipated payments of interest (cash flows) on the designated debt
instruments from adverse market interest rate changes. The maturity date of
each of the interest rate cap and swap hedges corresponds exactly with the
maturity dates of the designated debt instruments. As of March 31,
2008, the Company has recorded $16.8 million of unrealized losses in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) associated with these hedges.
War Risk Insurance
. Following September 11,
2001, aviation insurers significantly increased airline insurance premiums and
reduced the maximum amount of coverage available to airlines for certain types
of claims. In addition, our insurance costs increased significantly following
the 2005 Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita events. Our total aviation and
other insurance expenses were $7.1 million higher for the three months ended March 31,
2008 than the three months ended March 31, 2000. The FAA is currently
providing aviation war risk insurance as required by the Homeland Security Act
of 2002 as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2005 and
subsequently by the Continuing Appropriations Resolution 2007. However,
following multiple extensions, this coverage is scheduled to expire on August 31,
2008. While the government may again extend the period that it provides excess
war risk coverage, there is no assurance that this will occur, or if it does,
how long the extension will last, what will be included in the coverage, or at
what cost the coverage will be provided. Should the U.S. government stop
providing war risk insurance in its current form to the U.S. airline industry,
it is expected that the premiums charged by commercial aviation insurers for
this coverage, if available at all, would be substantially higher than the
premiums currently charged by the government, the maximum amount of coverage
available would be reduced, and the type of coverage could be more restrictive.
Commercial aviation insurers could further increase insurance premiums and
reduce or cancel coverage, in the event of a new terrorist attack or other
events adversely affecting the airline industry. Significant increases in
insurance premiums could negatively impact our financial condition and results
of operations. If we are unable to obtain adequate war risk insurance, our
business could be materially and adversely affected.
If we were to be involved in an accident, we could be
exposed to significant tort liability. Although we carry insurance to cover
damages arising from such accidents, resulting tort liability could be higher
than our policy limits which could negatively impact our financial condition.
Open Skies Air Services Agreement.
In April 2007,
the U.S. and the European Union (E.U.) approved an open skies air services
agreement that provides airlines from the U.S. and E.U. Member States open
access to each others markets, with freedom of pricing and unlimited rights to
fly beyond the U.S. and beyond each E.U. Member State. Under the open
skies agreement, which went into effect on March 30, 2008, every
U.S. and E.U. airline is authorized to operate between airports in the U.S. and
Londons Heathrow, Gatwick and other airports. As a result of the
open skies agreement, the Company announced an expansion of its transatlantic
route network with three new daily nonstop flights to London Heathrow from
Detroit, Minneapolis/St. Paul and Seattle. Service from Minneapolis/St. Paul
began on March 29, 2008 with an arrival at London Heathrow on March 30,
2008. Nonstop service from Detroit and Seattle is scheduled to begin on May 1,
2008 and June 1, 2008, respectively.
29
Tentative Approval of Six-Way
Antitrust Immunity.
On June 28, 2007, Northwest and KLM, together
with Air France, Delta, Alitalia, and CSA Czech Airlines filed a joint
application for antitrust immunity with the DOT. The DOT tentatively approved the application on April 9, 2008. Final
approval is expected to follow after the DOT reviews the final round of
comments to its show cause order, and would enable the carriers to expand
their transatlantic networks by coordinating schedules and services with a
single, customer-focused objective.
Forward-Looking Statements.
Certain of the
statements made throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this quarterly report are
not purely historical facts, including statements regarding our beliefs,
expectations, intentions or strategies for the future, may be forward-looking
statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All
forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from the plans, intentions and
expectations reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. Such
risks and uncertainties include, among others, the ability of the company to
operate pursuant to the terms of its financing facilities (particularly the
related financial covenants), the ability of the company to attract, motivate
and/or retain key executives and associates, the future level of air travel
demand, the companys future passenger traffic and yields, the airline industry
pricing environment, increased costs for security, the cost and availability of
aviation insurance coverage and war risk coverage, the general economic
condition of the U.S. and other regions of the world, the price and
availability of jet fuel, the war in Iraq, the possibility of additional
terrorist attacks or the fear of such attacks, concerns about Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and other influenza or contagious illnesses, labor
strikes, work disruptions, labor negotiations both at other carriers and the
company, difficulties in integrating the operations of the company and Delta
following the Merger, low cost carrier expansion, capacity decisions of other
carriers, actions of the U.S. and foreign governments (including conditions
imposed by U.S. or foreign governments to obtain regulatory approval for the
Merger), foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and inflation. Other
factors include the possibility that the Merger may not close, including due to
the failure to receive required stockholder or regulatory approvals, or the
failure of other closing conditions. Northwest cautions that the foregoing list
of factors is not exclusive. Additional information with respect to the factors
and events that could cause differences between forward-looking statements and
future actual results is contained in the companys Securities and Exchange
Commission filings, including the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007 and subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q
and current reports on Form 8-K. We undertake no obligation to update any
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise
after the date of this release.
Developments in any of these areas, as well as other
risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the Companys Securities
and Exchange Commission filings, could cause the Companys results to differ
from results that have been or may be projected by or on behalf of the Company.
The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. These statements deal with the Companys expectations
about the future and are subject to a number of factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from the Companys expectations. All subsequent
written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to the Company, or
persons acting on behalf of the Company, are expressly qualified in their
entirety by the factors described above.
30
Item 3.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Information required by
this item is provided under the captions Foreign Currency and Aircraft Fuel
within Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Also see Item 7a.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in the Companys 2007
Form 10-K.
Item 4.
Controls
and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures
As of March 31, 2008,
management performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the
participation of the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer and
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
covered in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation,
the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures are effective in alerting them in a timely manner to
material information required to be disclosed in the Companys periodic reports
filed with the SEC as of the end of such period.
Changes in Internal Control
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Companys fiscal first quarter ended March 31,
2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal
Proceedings.
Reference is made to Item
3. Legal Proceedings in the Companys 2007 Form 10-K.
Item 1A.
Risk
Factors.
See Part I, Item 1A., Risk Factors, of the
2007 Form 10-K for a detailed discussion of the risk factors affecting the
Company. The information below provides updates to the previously disclosed
risk factors and should be read in conjunction with the risk factors and
information disclosed in the Companys 2007 Form 10-K.
Risks Relating to the Pending Merger
with Delta Air Lines
Uncertainty about the merger and diversion of management could harm us
or the combined company, whether or not the merger is completed.
In response to the
announcement of the merger, current and prospective employees could experience
uncertainty about their future with us or the combined company. These
uncertainties may impair our ability to retain, recruit or motivate key
personnel. Completion of the merger will also require a significant amount of
time and attention from our management. The diversion of management attention
away from ongoing operations could adversely affect our business relationships.
If the merger is not completed by the end of 2008 as currently anticipated,
the adverse effects of these uncertainties and the diversion of management
could be exacerbated by the delay.
Failure to complete the merger for regulatory or other reasons could
adversely affect our stock price and our future business and financial results.
Completion of the merger is
conditioned upon, among other things, the receipt of certain regulatory and
antitrust approvals, including under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, approval of our and Delta Air Lines stockholders.
There is no assurance that we will receive the necessary approvals or satisfy
the other conditions necessary for completion of the merger. Failure to
complete the pending merger would prevent us from realizing the anticipated
benefits of the merger. We will also incur transaction costs, whether or not
the merger is completed. In addition, the current market price of our common
stock may reflect a market assumption that the merger will occur, and a failure
to complete the merger could result in a negative perception by the market of
us generally and a resulting decline in the market price of our common stock.
31
The anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized fully or at
all or may take longer to realize than expected.
The merger involves the
integration of two companies that have previously operated independently. Prior
to announcement, we did not conduct any integration planning for the two
companies. The two companies will devote significant management attention and
resources to integrating the two companies. Delays in this process could
adversely affect the combined companys business, financial results, financial
condition and stock price. Even if we are able to integrate our business operations
successfully, there can be no assurance that this integration will result in
the realization of the full benefits of synergies, cost savings, innovation and
operational efficiencies that we currently expect from this integration or that
these benefits will be achieved within the anticipated time frame.
Additionally, as a condition
to their approval of the merger, regulatory agencies may impose requirements,
limitations or costs or require divestitures or place restrictions on the
conduct of the combined companys business. If we agree to these requirements,
limitations, costs, divestitures or restrictions, our ability to realize the
anticipated benefits of the merger may be impaired.
Any ownership change could limit our ability to
utilize our net operating loss carryforwards.
Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the Internal Revenue Code), a corporation is generally allowed a deduction
in any taxable year for net operating losses carried over from prior years. As
of December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately $3.6 billion of
federal and state net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards. A corporations use
of its NOL carryforwards is generally limited under Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code if a corporation undergoes an ownership change. However, when an ownership change occurs
pursuant to the implementation of a plan of reorganization under the Bankruptcy
Code (as was the case on the Effective Date of the Companys Plan), special rules in
either Section 382(l)(5) or Section 382(l)(6) of the
Internal Revenue Code apply instead of the general Section 382 limitation
rules. In general terms, Sections 382(l)(5) or (l)(6) allow for a
more favorable utilization of a companys NOL carryforwards than would
otherwise have been available following an ownership change not in connection
with a plan of reorganization.
Completion of the merger may result in a second
ownership change under Section 382. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the
Company will elect out of Section 382(l)(5). In that case, Section 382(l)(6) will
be applicable to the ownership change that occurred pursuant to the Plan of
Reorganization. Nonetheless, a second ownership change could further limit the
Companys ability to utilize its NOL carryforwards for taxable years including
or following the subsequent ownership change.
Item 6.
|
Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Exhibits
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 14, 2008, by and
among Delta Air Lines, Inc., Nautilus Merger Corporation and Northwest
Airlines Corporation (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to NWA Corp.s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on April 18, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
|
|
|
*10.1
|
Third Amendment of Northwest Airlines Excess Pension Plan for Salaried
Employees (2001 Restatement).
|
|
|
|
|
*10.2
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Northwest Airlines Corporation Key
Employee Annual Cash Incentive Program.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.3
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Northwest Airlines, Inc. 2003 Long
Term Cash Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.4
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for the Northwest
Airlines, Inc. 2003 Long Term Cash Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.5
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Northwest Airlines Corporation 2007 Stock
Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.6
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for Non-Qualified
Stock Options Granted to Directors under the Northwest Airlines Corporation
2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
32
|
*10.7
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for Non-Qualified
Stock Options Granted to Employees under the Northwest Airlines Corporation
2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.8
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for Restricted
Stock Units Granted to Directors under the Northwest Airlines Corporation
2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.9
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for Restricted
Stock Units (Settled in Stock) Granted to Employees under the Northwest
Airlines Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.10
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for Restricted
Stock Units (Settled in Cash) Granted to Employees under the Northwest
Airlines Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.11
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for Stock
Appreciation Rights Granted to Employees under the Northwest Airlines
Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.12
|
Northwest Airlines, Inc. 2008 Retention Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.13
|
Retention Agreement and Amendment to Management Compensation Agreement
dated as of April 14, 2008 between Northwest Airlines, Inc. and
Douglas M. Steenland.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.14
|
Form of Amendment to Management Compensation Agreements between
Northwest Airlines, Inc. and Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.15
|
Amended and Restated Management Compensation Agreement dated as of
April 14, 2008 between Northwest Airlines, Inc. and Neal S. Cohen.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.16
|
Management Compensation Agreement dated as of April 14, 2008
between Northwest Airlines, Inc. and David M. Davis.
|
|
|
|
|
*10.17
|
Management Compensation Agreement dated as of April 14, 2008
between Northwest Airlines, Inc. and Andrew C. Roberts.
|
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer.
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer.
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
*Compensatory
plans in which directors and executive officers of NWA Corp. and Northwest
participate.
33
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the
requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized this
30
th
day of April 2008.
|
NORTHWEST AIRLINES CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ Anna M. Schaefer
|
|
|
Anna M. Schaefer
|
|
|
Vice President Finance and Chief Accounting
Officer
(principal accounting officer)
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 14, 2008, by and
among Delta Air Lines, Inc., Nautilus Merger Corporation and Northwest
Airlines Corporation (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to NWA Corp.s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on April 18, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
|
|
*10.1
|
|
Third Amendment of Northwest Airlines Excess Pension Plan for Salaried
Employees (2001 Restatement).
|
|
|
|
*10.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Northwest Airlines Corporation Key Employee
Annual Cash Incentive Program.
|
|
|
|
*10.3
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Northwest Airlines, Inc. 2003 Long Term
Cash Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
*10.4
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for the Northwest
Airlines, Inc. 2003 Long Term Cash Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
*10.5
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Northwest Airlines Corporation 2007 Stock
Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
*10.6
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for Non-Qualified
Stock Options Granted to Directors under the Northwest Airlines Corporation
2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
*10.7
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for Non-Qualified
Stock Options Granted to Employees under the Northwest Airlines Corporation
2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
*10.8
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for Restricted Stock
Units Granted to Directors under the Northwest Airlines Corporation 2007
Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
*10.9
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for Restricted Stock
Units (Settled in Stock) Granted to Employees under the Northwest Airlines
Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
34
*10.10
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for Restricted Stock
Units (Settled in Cash) Granted to Employees under the Northwest Airlines
Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
*10.11
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Form of Award Agreement for Stock
Appreciation Rights Granted to Employees under the Northwest Airlines
Corporation 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
*10.12
|
|
Northwest Airlines, Inc. 2008 Retention Plan.
|
|
|
|
*10.13
|
|
Retention Agreement and Amendment to Management Compensation Agreement
dated as of April 14, 2008 between Northwest Airlines, Inc. and
Douglas M. Steenland.
|
|
|
|
*10.14
|
|
Form of Amendment to Management Compensation Agreements between
Northwest Airlines, Inc. and Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
*10.15
|
|
Amended and Restated Management Compensation Agreement dated as of
April 14, 2008 between Northwest Airlines, Inc. and Neal S. Cohen.
|
|
|
|
*10.16
|
|
Management Compensation Agreement dated as of April 14, 2008 between
Northwest Airlines, Inc. and David M. Davis.
|
|
|
|
*10.17
|
|
Management Compensation Agreement dated as of April 14, 2008 between
Northwest Airlines, Inc. and Andrew C. Roberts.
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
*Compensatory
plans in which directors and executive officers of NWA Corp. and Northwest
participate.
35
Northwest Airline (NYSE:NWA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Northwest Airline (NYSE:NWA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024