Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (CE) (IPIX) Quote

So you are saying it's intelligent to post ubiquitous criticism for years and years on a company with a share price of 0.0001?

Yeah, just what i thought.

Thank you Sunnyboy for proving my point once again. You never fail.

I doubt it, TBH.

With one exception I suspect those still holding could never be categorised as being as smart as IPIX’ critics.

I’m not including all the anti-vaxxers who supported IPIX - I suspect they’re mostly dead already.

In both cases it’s natural selection in action.

So theoretically, if you sold, one could obtain a similar level of intelligence as those who continually post derogatory comments about a company with a share price of 0.0003?

Got it.

There's an even better reason......so you don't wake up every morning feeling stoopid.

The only reason to sell now is to capture a capital loss for tax purposes. Hope springs eternal for a reversal of fortune.

You may be right as Sleep At the Wheel Ehrlich is too out of it to actually do anything, even file for bankruptcy. He may just let his debacle die on the vine.

According to many here, you should had sold many moons ago!!!!!

😳. Wait..... was I supposed to sell all my shares???

When will there be an update from the company? Am I the only idiot still holding shares?

"Bankruptcy is around the corner and that is a fact."

Facts can be easily proven.

So prove it.

Give it up and admit you have lost everything invested in this failed mess.

That about sums it all up...

This is from you all know who and he was a long that had a connection with Leo and ended up losing a fortune.

William DeGrado along with the other Scientific Advisors are not working for Innovation Pharmaceuticals anymore and haven't for almost 2 years. Just like Jane Harness Senior VP no longer works there in fact her linkedin account says she NEVER worked there.
If that doesn't concern you then you have a real problem.
Leo needs to update that website or take it down.
Bankruptcy is around the corner and that is a fact.
We have been scammed.

So why would you choose to continually mention it?

" One of DeGrado’s most notable
achievements is the development of Brilacidin, a drug
candidate classified as a defensin-mimetic. Brilacidin is
designed to mimic host defense peptides, offering broad-
spectrum antimicrobial activity. This compound has proven
effective against various infectious pathogens and has shown
promising antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2, the virus
responsible for COVID-19. His efforts in advancing Brilacidin
through multiple phases of clinical trials highlight its potential
as a versatile therapeutic, particularly for addressing bacterial
and viral infections with global health implications. As one of
the first synthetic mimics of antimicrobial peptides to enter
clinical trials, Brilacidin has been an exemplary story of
innovation."

I guess DeGrado feels as good about this Company as the stock market does....he chose not to mention it.

Ipix scientific advisor:
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsinfecdis.5c00396

What is the point if you have a rudderless ship with only one person left and that person is so brain dead he can't even bother to carry out a simple task like maintaining his company website to reflect the current state of his collapsed empire.

What could get interesting is this excerpt from the recently published article.- "warrants further in-depth investigation"
The peptide exhibited rapid bactericidal activity, reducing N. gonorrhoeae high inoculum within two hours. Moreover, brilacidin was superior to the drug of choice, ceftriaxone, in eliminating the intracellular N. gonorrhoeae harbored within endocervical cells. Additionally, brilacidin showed high tolerability in mammalian cells and lacked hemolytic activity in human erythrocytes. Altogether, the results demonstrate that brilacidin is a promising anti-gonococcal agent that warrants further in-depth investigation.

"Just interested" huh? 😆

"I have little or no interest in the financial fortunes of their hapless, greedy gullible marks, especially those who defend the indefensible with personal attacks and insults."

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176258522

"Are you IPIX longs rich yet like you said you would be?"

Okie Doke Sunny boy. I just can't help myself asking you rhetorical questions. We know exactly why you are here. You ARE entertaining.

Carry on.

As I have explained countless times before, I’m interested in penny stock scams, those who run them and those who promote them.

I find it mildly engaging and I also don’t like grifters, crooks and criminals like Leo Ehrlich.

I have little or no interest in the financial fortunes of their hapless, greedy gullible marks, especially those who defend the indefensible with personal attacks and insults.

However this latter group (which would appear to include you) deserve to have the contumely they pile upon those like me who have proven to be consistently right re-directed at themselves.

The peptide exhibited rapid bactericidal activity, reducing N. gonorrhoeae high inoculum within two hours. Moreover, brilacidin was superior to the drug of choice, ceftriaxone, in eliminating the intracellular N. gonorrhoeae harbored within endocervical cells. Additionally, brilacidin showed high tolerability in mammalian cells and lacked hemolytic activity in human erythrocytes. Altogether, the results demonstrate that brilacidin is a promising anti-gonococcal agent that warrants further in-depth investigation.

Great find SitTight. Thanks for posting.

"Are you IPIX longs rich yet like you said you would be?"

Why would you have the slightest concern about a complete stranger's investment?

How does this affect you personally? Please enlighten.

And another new study: "Brilacidin for combating multidrug-resistant N. gonorrhoeae"!

After your great find about DeGrado's new E .coli study, here's another new study about Brilcidin and N. gonorrhoeae.
Neisseria gonorrhoeae is classified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as an urgent public health threat due to rising infections and rapid resistance development. N. gonorrhoeae has developed resistance to nearly all FDA-approved drugs, with ceftriaxone being the only remaining effective treatment for gonococcal infections.
[..]
Herein, brilacidin displayed potent activity against a panel of 22 drug-resistant strains of N. gonorrhoeae, inhibiting 50% of the strains tested (MIC50) at the concentration of 4 µg/mL. The peptide exhibited rapid bactericidal activity, reducing N. gonorrhoeae high inoculum within two hours. Moreover, brilacidin was superior to the drug of choice, ceftriaxone, in eliminating the intracellular N. gonorrhoeae harbored within endocervical cells. Additionally, brilacidin showed high tolerability in mammalian cells and lacked hemolytic activity in human erythrocytes. Altogether, the results demonstrate that brilacidin is a promising anti-gonococcal agent that warrants further in-depth investigation.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325722
Published: June 5, 2025
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325722

“ And then there is our ownership interest in BeaMed”

In the immortal words of Tonto to the (real) Lone Ranger, “who is this we and our, Pale Face?”.

Thanks for that update. And then there is our ownership interest in BeaMed.

Independent research in Brilacidin continues:
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acsinfecdis.5c00023

New patents who include Brilacidin for 2025 = 9:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search?q=brilacidin

Are you IPIX longs rich yet like you said you would be?

Just asking. After all. y'all told me I was dumb and stupid and corrupt for pointing out the truth.

IPIX is dead. Bagholders are screwed.

Any cash would go right into Ehrlich the scam artist's pocket. This goose has long been cooked.

I think you missed the quotation marks; it should be:

"President" Trump.

It’s being reviewed by the appeals court. After that, it’s reviewed by President Trump.

so when will the courts decision be made?

Only frees up “shares” of the company Beamed that are being held as collateral.

If they win this decision, does this free up some cash or release them from some binding legal issue? What I see is a company with a OTC Markets Delinquent SEC Reporting status. I just want to see how this court decision will impact them. Thanks.

On the cusp of an appeals court decision. If Innovation wins, and Beamed Laser starts making money, the stock may rise. Leo will go on with developing Purisol, Kevetrin, and other drugs. Some of the longs here would get their investment back, if they haven’t passed away already. (Post mostly fiction)

what's with all the fluctuations?

" do you have personal familial contacts with insider information as you indicate you have with IPIX?"

Your reading comprehension seems to be poor.

Nothing in this post of mine suggests that I have "familial connections" with IPIX:

"Someone who I don’t entirely trust told me that, and I quote:

“ Leo is selling his $2,000,000 estate to son Elliot for a BUCK!”


If true, I guess that’s the kind of thing you do before being sued for bankruptcy."

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175929947

Let me clarify things for you as it seems you need some help. The person I "don't entirely trust" is a former IPIX long and poster on this very MB who contacted me by other means to give me this information. It seems he or she does have some links because they did have what appeared to be inside information which he or she posted on this MB before it was made public by IPIX.

I do hope that helps. Do let me know if any of the long words are too tricky for you, or if you still can't grasp the meaning of my posts. They're not that difficult really.

You're welcome.

So, in the vast majority of penny stock scams that you follow, do you have personal familial contacts with insider information as you indicate you have with IPIX?

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175929947

Or is this an extremely fortunate coincidence? Certainly, does appear to greatly benefit you in your "scam studies". 😏 If nothing, you are entertaining.

Carry on.

Hello everyone....surprised at the ongoing activity this board still has. Maybe IPIX will come back one day. Still in the hunt!

"Intellectual curiosity". Hundreds of hours, years and years. Of course.

What's your point, genius?

Wow 10 years and still at it. And what a coincidence, 2015 was also the mako short...

Because I enjoy studying scams, those who promote them and those who run them.

When I first posted on this MB in August 2915, IPIX had a market cap of several hundred million dollars and a pps of over $4.

In all that time, I've always been right, and IPIX enthusiasts have always been wrong.

It's the same with the vast majority of penny stock scams I follow.

What's your excuse?

Why put this much effort into a .0001 company? 😂

You should watch it yourself to get an accurate picture.

IPIX' attorney got savaged at the beginning, and just kept repeating himself. He did himself or his client no favors, except that maybe he garnered some sympathy for the difficult position he was in.

Englander did indeed seem unhappy with the Plaintiff's approach, but a contract is a contract, and the law is the law as Englander reluctantly acknowledged.

The original verdict will almost certainly be upheld, and there will be no settlement.

Bankruptcy awaits IPIX, but not Leo Ehrlich who has already transferred any assets from the company to himself, his family, and his chums.

Outstanding! Thanks for the recap.

I watched the appeal hearing. I thought that the IPIX attorney did an outstanding job. One of the judges, -- Englander, showed obvious distain for Cummings history of what he referred to as playing "gotcha" with at least two other tenants. My guess is that they will reach a financial settlement favorable to IPIX. A verdict should come soon.

Doubt it - the contract was clear in terms of what constituted termination, and the law is the law, even if Justice Englander got a little feisty towards the end.

"Expression of intent is sufficient" Is this Leo's off ramp.

Thanks very much for providing that. I don't see how they can overturn the original ruling.