Baron Capital Enterprise Inc (CE) (BCAP) Quote

Please cite where I said he wouldn't get control. I have simply focused on the 3a10 and other missteps. Feel free to quote me.

👇 They got the custodianship right!! Which you have yet to admit you were WRONG on!! Zero accomplishment's in life will leave you wondering!! You try until you get it right!! Trial and error!! Basic man training!!

Not sure how they are going to to get the TA lawsuit done when they can't even get basic procedural stuff right in court.

Case #: 11-2024-CA-001018-0001-01

Is Karkason the most incompetent attorney I've ever seen? Yes, he and Jake just constantly fail at intern level court issues. Literally everything they do is a fail and directly against the law. This is absolutely comical the incompetence of Jake and his idiot lawyer.

31m bid for a EM ticker. That's nuts. Unheard of.

Very hard to get any of them.

Thanks Glad.

I have a Canadian friend thinking of buying some.

GLTAL

BID 31364800 X 0,0001
ASK 10000 X 0,0003

Current bid/ask?

Sweet and lo tone it down!! Who are you to prove anything to??
At least I don't talk out of my ass like you and a certain other pumper.

Where's the TA lawsuit Jake P. Noch and pumpers like yourself keep talking about?

It would be public info yet it doesn't exist.

👇 Sweet and lo tone it down!! Who are you to prove anything to?? Hope he makes sure you're the last to know anything!! Too much money has been invested to turn around!! Progress can be delayed but not stopped!!

Still working on it.
Show us proof that anyone is working on anything concerning BCAP with documentation to back it up.

You can't.

Just another pumper spreading lies as usual.

Still working on it. That's great. This will be a good 2025 ticker 🚀

He needs the lawsuit filed in NYS before anything serious can get done. Without TA records he can't do the filings.

Baron Capital Enterprise, Inc. (OTC: $BCAP) is in the process of updating its bylaws with the Florida Secretary of State.
12:15 PM · Jan 7, 2025
·
117
Views
FYI- sent update request this morning-- had this reply by noon

He said this today.

https://x.com/sunset_tg/status/1876678963613069800?s=46 

You've already proven that you can't back up any of your claims with documentation.

In other words, you're talking (pumping) out of your ass.

Where is BCAP's lawsuit to get control of the books from the TA?

It would be public information yet it doesn't exist.

Without the books Jake can't do anything with the stock and the SEC.

Again, you're talking out of your ass.

This stock is incredibly thin!! Jake took a major amount of shares off the table!! Not to mention us Legacy shareholders!! There will be share cancelation in the future!! It's all up to Jake how this plays out!! Sky is the Limit!!

Looks good. Peeps hitting the ask. Gonna be a good runner here 🚀

JAKE P. NOCH - BCAP CEO FRAUD PART II

https://www.billboard.com/pro/spotify-indie-label-streaming-fraud-millions-fake-accounts-countersuit/

Spotify Countersues Indie Label, Alleging Massive Streaming Fraud & Millions of Fake Accounts

Spotify has countersued indie label Sosa Entertainment and its founder Jake Noch, alleging massive streaming fraud, unjust enrichment and the creation of millions of fake accounts to generate…

In November 2019, indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment and its founder, 20-year-old Jake Noch, filed a lawsuit against Spotify that alleged the streaming service failed to pay royalties on over 550 million streams of its music. The suit, which was also brought on behalf of Noch’s PRO Pro Music Rights (which was later removed), sought $150,000 in statutory damages for each infringement, and alleged that Spotify removed its music not because it detected “abnormal streaming activity,” as the service claimed, but because it was trying to dodge paying royalties on the streams.

Now, Spotify has fired back with a countersuit alleging that Noch “designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams” in order to “manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters.” The filing, which is supported by screenshots of messages allegedly between Noch and a “bot farmer” and charts that show streams on Noch’s music go from zero into the hundreds of thousands in a matter of days, also alleges that Noch directed the bot farmer to create millions of fake accounts and changed the names of songs in his catalog to closely resemble those of established hit songs, like XXXTentacion’s “SAD!” and DJ Snake’s “Taki Taki.”

Spotify has countersued indie label Sosa Entertainment and its founder Jake Noch, alleging massive streaming fraud, unjust enrichment and the creation of millions of fake accounts to generate…

BY DAN RYS

In November 2019, indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment and its founder, 20-year-old Jake Noch, filed a lawsuit against Spotify that alleged the streaming service failed to pay royalties on over 550 million streams of its music. The suit, which was also brought on behalf of Noch’s PRO Pro Music Rights (which was later removed), sought $150,000 in statutory damages for each infringement, and alleged that Spotify removed its music not because it detected “abnormal streaming activity,” as the service claimed, but because it was trying to dodge paying royalties on the streams.

Now, Spotify has fired back with a countersuit alleging that Noch “designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams” in order to “manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters.” The filing, which is supported by screenshots of messages allegedly between Noch and a “bot farmer” and charts that show streams on Noch’s music go from zero into the hundreds of thousands in a matter of days, also alleges that Noch directed the bot farmer to create millions of fake accounts and changed the names of songs in his catalog to closely resemble those of established hit songs, like XXXTentacion’s “SAD!” and DJ Snake’s “Taki Taki.”

Indie Hip-Hop Label Files Suit Against Spotify Over Catalog Takedown

Noch, who lists himself as the chief executive of Sosa and Pro Music Rights, as well as a handful of additional music companies, has quite the proud litigious history, having released several press releases touting lawsuits against Spotify, Apple, Google, YouTube, Amazon, SoundCloud, Pandora, Deezer, iHeartRadio and more. Pro Music Rights claims a database of some 2 million tracks, including more than 23,000 by various artists using some form of the name “LEGATO,” like LEGATO_DIMY, LEGATODE45, LEGATODI001, LEGATOGILL2002 and LEGATOKAL999, to name a few.

According to Spotify’s counterclaim, filed Monday (May 18), the service first detected artificial streaming activity on Noch’s content in March 2016 and eventually banned his music from the service, before extending that ban to all content related to Noch. Noch then tried to “smuggle” the content back onto the service using slightly different names and created millions of fake accounts to stream that music.

In June 2016, a whistleblower contacted Spotify with screenshots that purported to show Noch directing the person to create millions (direct quote: “i need millions”) of fake accounts. And while Spotify had identified the fraud a few months prior, the company had already paid a small amount of royalties to Sosa and Noch — royalties that otherwise would have gone to legitimate songwriters with songs being streamed by legitimate fans. According to the complaint, for one of Noch’s albums that jumped from zero streams to more than 400,000 in just days, 99% of its streams came from Spotify’s ad-supported free tier and from accounts registered to male users in the United States, a pattern that was also found for other works.

Noch then changed distributors and changed the names of some of his companies in order to dodge Spotify’s fraud detection systems, with slightly different artist names, song titles and cover artwork. In one section of the complaint, attorneys wrote that “analysts at Spotify found that 5,500 ‘users’ streaming one of the Sosa albums ‘originated’ from a small American town with a total population of 10,000. For that album, the stream count jumped from zero to 749,000 streams in a span of only two days… This pattern is highly anomalous and not at all correlated to any possible pattern of genuine streaming activity.”

In another example from the complaint, in what the filing calls “title track parasitism,” Noch and Sosa uploaded tracks called “SAD!” with the same punctuation as the XXXTentacion hit, and “Taki Take,” shortly after the similarly-named DJ Snake song reached the top 20 of the Billboard Hot 100. Some of the tracks that Noch and Sosa would release on Spotify were AI-generated sound loops.

In all, Spotify’s counterclaim seeks relief for fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices. As another line in the complaint reads, “This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history.”

After the publication of this story, Noch provided a comment to Billboard which reads, in part, “Spotify’s claims are laughable… I also greatly look forward to the day we get to go to court, and I hope that all of Spotify’s shareholders will pay close attention to these cases… Time will prove that we are right.”

JAKE P. NOCH - BCAP CEO FRAUD PART I

https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7gmvd/spotify-sues-self-described-music-prodigy-who-allegedly-ran-royalties-scam

Spotify Sues Self-Described 'Music Prodigy' Who Allegedly Ran Royalties Scam

Spotify says Jake Noch "[generated] hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams" and engaged in "title track parasitism" among other fraudulent practices on its platform.

JC

By Jelisa Castrodale

May 19, 2020, 4:38pm

Last November, the 20-year-old head of indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment filed a massive (and massively complicated) lawsuit against Spotify, alleging that the digital music service hadn't paid royalties on more than 550 million streams of its songs. According to Billboard, Sosa Entertainment founder Jake Noch also named his other company, PRO Music Rights, as a plaintiff in the lawsuit, and the co-plaintiffs sought millions of dollars in damages, asking for $150,000 for each infringement.

Noch's lawsuit accused Spotify of a number of transgressions, including unfair and deceptive business practices, willfully removing Sosa Entertainment's content, "obliterating" his expectations, and refusing to pay royalties. In a statement, Noch said that he was willing to "fight to the end" if it meant that Spotify would ultimately compensate the artists who were affected.

"I have a duty to see this through so that I can pay my artists what they are owed from Spotify," he said. "I know others feel the same way as I blaze this trail for the music community, who I know is behind me and roots for our success in bringing down Spotify."

Part of Noch's problems with the company started in the spring of 2017 when Spotify removed all of Sosa Entertainment's song's from its servers and "blanket banned" Noch and his companies from using the platform going forward. According to Noch—who describes himself as a "musical prodigy" in his lawsuit—Spotify informed him that the songs were removed because of "abnormal streaming activity," but the company didn't give him the opportunity to explain what could've caused the weird-looking streaming data. Noch has alleged that Spotify just "fabricated a reason" to kick him off the platform, in an attempt to avoid having to pay the royalties that he was due.

But in its own countersuit, filed on Monday, Spotify says no, it was just because of the abnormal streaming, and also because Noch allegedly "designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams" in order to game the system and rack up a ton of royalty payments.

"Starting in 2016, Noch designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams on songs he had seeded on Spotify’s online music-streaming service," the company's complaint reads. "Noch’s objective was plain: to manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters."

Billboard reports that Spotify removed Noch's content from its platform after being contacted by a whistleblower who claimed that Noch had instructed a bot farmer to create literally millions of fake accounts to stream songs from the Sosa Entertainment catalog. Spotify's own analysts became suspicious when one of Noch's records went from zero streams to 400,000 in under a week, while a second album racked up 749,000 streams in two days. (Spotify also apparently determined that 5,500 of the accounts that played the latter record supposedly all lived in the same American town—even though the town's total population was just around 10,000 people.)

The company has also accused Noch of "title track parasitism," which involves uploading songs with the same name and punctuation of legitimate hit songs. Spotify's legal filing identified two "AI-generated sound loops" that had been given the same name as then-popular tracks by DJ Snake and XXXTentacion.

"This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history," Spotify wrote in its complaint. The company's countersuit is asking for compensation for a long list of Noch's alleged transgressions, including fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices.

Damn, most 20-year-olds can only dream of being dragged that hard by an international streaming service. A musical prodigy, indeed.

Thanks, great to see small bid support.

thanks

Solid buys at 0.0003 

BID 1,832,800 X 0,0003 ASK 0,0004 X 900,000

Anyone have the bid and ask?

can you see the bid and ask? if so, how many and what price- thanks

0,0003$ que empieze la fiesta 🤑🚀

Someone buying at .0003👀

Since you can't answer what you said was "happening behind the scenes" - it just shows that you are clueless as to what's happening, yet you try to sound as if you know something - and you don't.

Still no filings for the TA lawsuit so it appears NOTHING is happening behind the scenes.

Common sense would help you!! A company is mandated to disclose certain things but not all!! Again it keeps the lifeless coyotes like you and your buddy from getting in the way of business!! Big Money is being spent and it's going to the Otc, judges and other administration!! No one has time for some foolish people trying to derail it!!

I would also like to know what is going on behind the scenes and who possibly could know that without Jake telling them... (nothing is happening, the courts in NY are public)

Many other things are happening behind the scenes!!
Such as?

You give a rough outline for business purposes!! Since you never ever even sniffed anything better than the fry rack or something that requires critical thinking you don't get it!! Many other things are happening behind the scenes!! Just like you looked up and had to read he gained custody while you spent countless hours saying otherwise!!

Project what? He literally released the to do list and plan. He stated the court, nothing was filed last I searched (its free). Thenonly thing he's hiding is his complete failure.

I wouldn't project any of my moves to you Losers!!

His lawyer probably told him to keep his pie hole shut.
Waaaaay too late for that...

.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Court stuff does take a lot of time, after you file it. There is no indication he has filed anything, thats the short part. Now his apathy to get that long process started will only delay everything further.

I'm sure there is a good excuse for wasting a ton of time on this instead though:

https://x.com/jpnfamilyoffice/status/1874922454063452353?s=46&t=BcHrcgHTNQz16xdPfdAIpg

On top of that he was able to file multiple briefs/motions in other receivership cases and have his lawyers attend and fumble badly two hearings related to those. BCAP isn't even close to his baby, Im sure he regrets it already.

Court shit takes a lot of time bro. I don't know why it seems to bother you if you dont even trade it. Just let it play out. Holidays are now over. Everyone has families, and most people like to travel to see them. The good stuff can now start soon. Patience. His lawyer probably told him to keep his pie hole shut.

Why is nothing getting done he promised? Looks like a quitter to me.

CEO is not a quitter. That's for sure. It takes as long as it takes. Do the words give up mean anything to you? Not a thing.

Troubles, like babies, grow larger by nursing. STOP COMPLAINING- https://x.com/zakayonoel37/status/1874839778077647096

Doesn't' even look like Jake has filed the lawsuit in NYS to get the records from the transfer agent nor does it look like he has access to OTCIQ. So far, he has updated everyone when a new step has been accomplished so my assumption is when he lied about the timing of getting this all done and then purposefully delayed getting things done he needs to get done... he is hiding that this is in fact harder than he thought and everyone isn't going to bow to him because he wants something.

I expect. him to cry on social media and in court within weeks.

It's 2025 LETS SEE THE FILINGS 

This hello kitty 😺 and gamestop is starting up the wind machine!! Lol!! This time I'm more than Ready!!

Let's get this pumped up 2025 Happy New Year Jake

Trips volume picking Up!! That 6 million dollar salary is waiting on you Jake!! Hmbl paid staff and investors handsomely!!

37,260,000 bidding .0001
Ask is 177,200 .0003

It's almost impossible to load these cheap shares.



After end of year dumps, this will rock n' roll in 2025 🚀

I'm thinking no wells notice for Jake. One day they will just up and file suit.


.

Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Company "Tweets" from Jake P Noch have not proven to be credible or a reliable source of information. Transparent as a brick wall, openly lies to his shareholders while draining their pockets to fill his own without regard for any shareholder besides himself. Wells notice for Mr Noch and his share dumping scheme(s) in 2025?

Filing doesnt, the stuff after that takes time. He is just not doing it.

if you don't like it- stop wasting everyone's time- nobody is making you buy or sell. as adults, we know our chances. ranting like a child doesn't change anyone's mind.