Baron Capital Enterprise Inc (CE) (BCAP) Quote

Sunset Trading Group LTD.
@Sunset_TG
·
20h
Baron Capital Enterprise, Inc. (OTC: $BCAP) anticipates providing an update in the near future. Stay tuned for more information.

🎼🎵 Timeee is on my side, oh yes it issss...🎤 Tick tock, tick tock

https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=mbelr

Huh... Why?


.


..


Buyer Beware
Pump and dump



.

1 cent or better??

#1 stock in 2025

Let's see what happens 🚀

this will go to .001 quick -- when it is tradeable.

End of year cheapies 🚀

Won't be this cheap for long 🤠

Loadem'

https://x.com/FLOWtarded/status/1857455275982094746

Jake P Noch, serial litigator suing innocent dance studios, independent artists, and people on food stamps for >$100k is now being sued by American Express for not paying his CC in two separate lawsuits totaling >$100k together.

The irony here is magical as he claims to be spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to get control of $BCAP and claims to be self funding $SONG... with some INSANE self righteous and undeserved indignant attitude publicly towards basically everyone hating him.

He deserves everything coming to him legally right now, and it won't end there. This is just the beginning.

he owns COMMON shares-- why would he shoot himself in the foot? RS makes ZERO SENSE.
That's already been explained. He legally needed to buy shares to have standing in court to get control of the company and now he can dump countless illegal 3a10 share into the market.

Yet pumpers here think that because he owns shares that this will explode in price when actually the opposite will happen here.

Jake P. Noch fraud part II:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7gmvd/spotify-sues-self-described-music-prodigy-who-allegedly-ran-royalties-scam

Spotify Sues Self-Described 'Music Prodigy' Who Allegedly Ran Royalties Scam

Spotify says Jake Noch "[generated] hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams" and engaged in "title track parasitism" among other fraudulent practices on its platform.

JC

By Jelisa Castrodale

May 19, 2020, 4:38pm

Last November, the 20-year-old head of indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment filed a massive (and massively complicated) lawsuit against Spotify, alleging that the digital music service hadn't paid royalties on more than 550 million streams of its songs. According to Billboard, Sosa Entertainment founder Jake Noch also named his other company, PRO Music Rights, as a plaintiff in the lawsuit, and the co-plaintiffs sought millions of dollars in damages, asking for $150,000 for each infringement.

Noch's lawsuit accused Spotify of a number of transgressions, including unfair and deceptive business practices, willfully removing Sosa Entertainment's content, "obliterating" his expectations, and refusing to pay royalties. In a statement, Noch said that he was willing to "fight to the end" if it meant that Spotify would ultimately compensate the artists who were affected.

"I have a duty to see this through so that I can pay my artists what they are owed from Spotify," he said. "I know others feel the same way as I blaze this trail for the music community, who I know is behind me and roots for our success in bringing down Spotify."

Part of Noch's problems with the company started in the spring of 2017 when Spotify removed all of Sosa Entertainment's song's from its servers and "blanket banned" Noch and his companies from using the platform going forward. According to Noch—who describes himself as a "musical prodigy" in his lawsuit—Spotify informed him that the songs were removed because of "abnormal streaming activity," but the company didn't give him the opportunity to explain what could've caused the weird-looking streaming data. Noch has alleged that Spotify just "fabricated a reason" to kick him off the platform, in an attempt to avoid having to pay the royalties that he was due.

But in its own countersuit, filed on Monday, Spotify says no, it was just because of the abnormal streaming, and also because Noch allegedly "designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams" in order to game the system and rack up a ton of royalty payments.

"Starting in 2016, Noch designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams on songs he had seeded on Spotify’s online music-streaming service," the company's complaint reads. "Noch’s objective was plain: to manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters."

Billboard reports that Spotify removed Noch's content from its platform after being contacted by a whistleblower who claimed that Noch had instructed a bot farmer to create literally millions of fake accounts to stream songs from the Sosa Entertainment catalog. Spotify's own analysts became suspicious when one of Noch's records went from zero streams to 400,000 in under a week, while a second album racked up 749,000 streams in two days. (Spotify also apparently determined that 5,500 of the accounts that played the latter record supposedly all lived in the same American town—even though the town's total population was just around 10,000 people.)

The company has also accused Noch of "title track parasitism," which involves uploading songs with the same name and punctuation of legitimate hit songs. Spotify's legal filing identified two "AI-generated sound loops" that had been given the same name as then-popular tracks by DJ Snake and XXXTentacion.

"This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history," Spotify wrote in its complaint. The company's countersuit is asking for compensation for a long list of Noch's alleged transgressions, including fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices.

Damn, most 20-year-olds can only dream of being dragged that hard by an international streaming service. A musical prodigy, indeed.

Jake P. Noch fraud part I:

https://www.billboard.com/pro/spotify-indie-label-streaming-fraud-millions-fake-accounts-countersuit/

Spotify Countersues Indie Label, Alleging Massive Streaming Fraud & Millions of Fake Accounts

Spotify has countersued indie label Sosa Entertainment and its founder Jake Noch, alleging massive streaming fraud, unjust enrichment and the creation of millions of fake accounts to generate…

In November 2019, indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment and its founder, 20-year-old Jake Noch, filed a lawsuit against Spotify that alleged the streaming service failed to pay royalties on over 550 million streams of its music. The suit, which was also brought on behalf of Noch’s PRO Pro Music Rights (which was later removed), sought $150,000 in statutory damages for each infringement, and alleged that Spotify removed its music not because it detected “abnormal streaming activity,” as the service claimed, but because it was trying to dodge paying royalties on the streams.

Now, Spotify has fired back with a countersuit alleging that Noch “designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams” in order to “manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters.” The filing, which is supported by screenshots of messages allegedly between Noch and a “bot farmer” and charts that show streams on Noch’s music go from zero into the hundreds of thousands in a matter of days, also alleges that Noch directed the bot farmer to create millions of fake accounts and changed the names of songs in his catalog to closely resemble those of established hit songs, like XXXTentacion’s “SAD!” and DJ Snake’s “Taki Taki.”

Spotify has countersued indie label Sosa Entertainment and its founder Jake Noch, alleging massive streaming fraud, unjust enrichment and the creation of millions of fake accounts to generate…

BY DAN RYS

In November 2019, indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment and its founder, 20-year-old Jake Noch, filed a lawsuit against Spotify that alleged the streaming service failed to pay royalties on over 550 million streams of its music. The suit, which was also brought on behalf of Noch’s PRO Pro Music Rights (which was later removed), sought $150,000 in statutory damages for each infringement, and alleged that Spotify removed its music not because it detected “abnormal streaming activity,” as the service claimed, but because it was trying to dodge paying royalties on the streams.

Now, Spotify has fired back with a countersuit alleging that Noch “designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams” in order to “manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters.” The filing, which is supported by screenshots of messages allegedly between Noch and a “bot farmer” and charts that show streams on Noch’s music go from zero into the hundreds of thousands in a matter of days, also alleges that Noch directed the bot farmer to create millions of fake accounts and changed the names of songs in his catalog to closely resemble those of established hit songs, like XXXTentacion’s “SAD!” and DJ Snake’s “Taki Taki.”

Indie Hip-Hop Label Files Suit Against Spotify Over Catalog Takedown

Noch, who lists himself as the chief executive of Sosa and Pro Music Rights, as well as a handful of additional music companies, has quite the proud litigious history, having released several press releases touting lawsuits against Spotify, Apple, Google, YouTube, Amazon, SoundCloud, Pandora, Deezer, iHeartRadio and more. Pro Music Rights claims a database of some 2 million tracks, including more than 23,000 by various artists using some form of the name “LEGATO,” like LEGATO_DIMY, LEGATODE45, LEGATODI001, LEGATOGILL2002 and LEGATOKAL999, to name a few.

According to Spotify’s counterclaim, filed Monday (May 18), the service first detected artificial streaming activity on Noch’s content in March 2016 and eventually banned his music from the service, before extending that ban to all content related to Noch. Noch then tried to “smuggle” the content back onto the service using slightly different names and created millions of fake accounts to stream that music.

In June 2016, a whistleblower contacted Spotify with screenshots that purported to show Noch directing the person to create millions (direct quote: “i need millions”) of fake accounts. And while Spotify had identified the fraud a few months prior, the company had already paid a small amount of royalties to Sosa and Noch — royalties that otherwise would have gone to legitimate songwriters with songs being streamed by legitimate fans. According to the complaint, for one of Noch’s albums that jumped from zero streams to more than 400,000 in just days, 99% of its streams came from Spotify’s ad-supported free tier and from accounts registered to male users in the United States, a pattern that was also found for other works.

Noch then changed distributors and changed the names of some of his companies in order to dodge Spotify’s fraud detection systems, with slightly different artist names, song titles and cover artwork. In one section of the complaint, attorneys wrote that “analysts at Spotify found that 5,500 ‘users’ streaming one of the Sosa albums ‘originated’ from a small American town with a total population of 10,000. For that album, the stream count jumped from zero to 749,000 streams in a span of only two days… This pattern is highly anomalous and not at all correlated to any possible pattern of genuine streaming activity.”

In another example from the complaint, in what the filing calls “title track parasitism,” Noch and Sosa uploaded tracks called “SAD!” with the same punctuation as the XXXTentacion hit, and “Taki Take,” shortly after the similarly-named DJ Snake song reached the top 20 of the Billboard Hot 100. Some of the tracks that Noch and Sosa would release on Spotify were AI-generated sound loops.

In all, Spotify’s counterclaim seeks relief for fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices. As another line in the complaint reads, “This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history.”

After the publication of this story, Noch provided a comment to Billboard which reads, in part, “Spotify’s claims are laughable… I also greatly look forward to the day we get to go to court, and I hope that all of Spotify’s shareholders will pay close attention to these cases… Time will prove that we are right.”

with a focus on enhancing shareholder value through strategic and forward-thinking initiatives.

Like you did at SONG?

Some shareholder value you brought to that stock. Investors in your schemes ONLY lose money. There is no "enhancing shareholder value" with any stock you are involved in.

Big Dreams start with small steps!!

Happy Thanksgiving BCAP, Jake, and friends.

https://x.com/Sunset_TG/status/1862134355281469813

Thanks... Now that I think about it, I believe I have seen a OTCM on L2.


..


..


Buyer Beware
Pump and dump



.

Yes, just recently, OTCMarkets has been granted the ability to file the 211. Agree, they will be as stringent as any B/D

Then OTCMarkets will need to file a Form 211 with FINRA. Though I'm not sure OTCMarkest is a broker dealer, Market Maker. I do know OTCMarkets is not a regulator. They too would need to follow the same rules as any Market Maker.


..


Buyer Beware
Pump and dump



.

OTC Link sponsors the 211 once OTC Markets deems it current in filings. I'm not sure why you non shareholders don't understand this, but it's not surprising you're confused. It will trade with quotes again just like a listed stock. Jake is doing it the right way 🚀

So as you guys play detective for free the smart ones are creating companies to take advantage of the loopholes given to those smart enough to find them!! You guys are so dumb you still think there's an old lady with a purse on the other side of a trade!! The market is a way to funnel wealth to their mediocre members!! If you thought working to get a pension was the ceiling don't fault others!!

0,0003 $

His LinkedIn profile says he is in Brazil and that his main role is as head of IT at Pro Mudic Rights 
https://www.linkedin.com/in/rodrigodifederico?utm_source=share&utm_campaign=share_via&utm_content=profile&utm_medium=ios_app

But according to his crunchbase profile he is located in Portugal, Europe again showing PrO Music Rights as his main job 

https://www.crunchbase.com/person/rodrigo-di-federico


Would be awesome to hear from the man himself in a video or live chat and also to understand why people are claiming that the SONG website triggers licenses and invoices when visitors only looking for basic information 

Curiously that CTO based in Sao Paulo, Brazil, hasn't yet acknowledged his latest high-paid position working for Jake, which is a shame since nobody here seems to know what the business is that he'll be "CTO-ing" to generate some income for BCAP shareholders. He's not following any of Jake's numerous twitter/x accounts apart from the old Pro Music Rights one, and Jake isn't following him from any of them in return. (It's the kind of thing friends normally do, isn't it?)
https://x.com/RodDiFederico
Given that, despite Rodrigo's long tenure as Pro Music Rights' CTO, there didn't appear to be any salary going to him in Jake's recent quarterlies for that particular company of his, I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out his $1M salary from BCAP ends up staying with Jake.

Your understanding is correct...


..


Buyer Beware
Pump and dump



.

The new CEO and new CTO will probably be the most excited as my understanding from their court filimgs is that they are awarding themselves $7m of annual salary to convert into ordinary shares to dump on retail investors plus special shares for the CEO to retain control after he has dumped his initial allocation of ordinary shares and diluted down ordinary shareholders ( see SONG 500,000 :1 reverse split ) 

With his special shares which ensures he still controls voting rights even after he has sold his ordinary shares he can issue yet more ordinary shares to himself and to his CTO to dump yet more ordinary shares onto retail investors.

Is my understanding incorrect? 

Who’s excited to see $BCAP achieve Pink Current status once again?
https://x.com/Sunset_TG/status/1861450409342128239

Lol... It can "trade" now... No Product, no "business" no 211 = garbage.



..


Buyer Beware
Pump and dump



.

It doesn’t need a Form 211 to trade, it’ll just be unsolicited quotes

Finding a sponsoring Market Maker to file a 211 with FINRA for BCAP may be difficult. They will likely have an issue with the way Jake operates. Market Makers error on the side of caution. Even if they do, FINRA may have an issue.


..


Buyer Beware
Pump and dump



.

Nice hopefully he gets access before year end

OTC Link files a court action in NYS to get the TA to release the records?

OTC Link takes care of it. No worries.

He needs a Form 211 before it can get Pink Current which requires a review of eligibility. I believe, but can't remember for sure, that he needs to first have access to the TA's info which he stated will require a court order in NYS.

So that may be the long tent in the poll.

Who’s excited to see $BCAP achieve Pink Current status once again?
https://x.com/Sunset_TG/status/1861450409342128239

Lemon 🍋 🤣 Old men shouldn't be jealous of young folks!! You had your chance!!

One thing Jakey is also going to have to worry about now that he has filed for his 3rd 3a10 and is likely working on 4 more as the courts progress... if your business is in fact the sale of unregistered securities (Jake P Noch Family Offices LLC) you must register as a broker dealer. SEC going hard after these folks.

https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26181

https://x.com/AlfredENewmemes/status/1861096597267816875

Why stalk someone then ask for assistance?? Looney bin!! You and Scam!! Lol!!

As soon as we see Verified Profile, that means he's logged in to OTCIQ and can post Financials. Pink Current happens shortly there after and we begin trading again. He's doing it correctly so far 🚀

FINRA has officially been made aware of the situation and the fact the TA(s), per Jake on his now deleted post (I screen captured for authorities), read the citations from I gave them from the SEC, case law on the issue(s) ,and examples of repercussions on the TA for not having proper compliance; and that their reaction is to say they don't need to monitor for compliance issues and they just unbiasedly process things.

This is in stark contrast to the fact they FINRA and the SEC require them to have compliance processes in place to identify and stop obvious fraud. They are not "off the hook" if they sign some indemnity document, in fact it makes is worse showing they knew about it and allowed it to happen anyways.

FINRA now has Jake's posts here claiming the TA read my emails and decided compliance was not a thing they needed to do. Further, that thinking they would flag such an obvious breach of securities laws and stop it is "crazy." These posts allege basically the TA read it all and discussed it with Jake or someone Jake identified as his representative and decided not to... comply with the obligations the SEC and FINRA require of them.

So, I would like to thank Jake for his assistance, until last week I have no proof any of the TAs had read my emails and no way of confirming they purposefully shirked their responsibility and compliance obligations given to them by FINRA and the SEC.

I appreciate Jakey for his assistance in giving me confirmation the TA is shirking their obligations and FINRA now has all the communications for review along with both TA's. I absolutely love it.

About to get real fun!

When will it be updated to otcmarkets.com ?

$BCAP: We now have financials updated through 2017. While we currently do not have access to the shareholder list, we are proceeding with the OTC IQ application regardless. If there are any issues, we anticipate obtaining the shareholder list within 30 days. More Updates coming!

https://x.com/sunset_tg/status/1861052219140792801?s=46 He just tweeted 

OK-- no need to waste time- move on.

Lol!! Yeah, that will never fly. There is an SEC fraud investigation and likely a federal one too.


..


.

auditor?

Thanks. That's really helpful. Lots of posts saying Jake anticipates something-or-other in the next few days or weeks, so lets hope at least some of them eventually happen. It's Monday 25th now so Mark should finally provide some good news by the end of the day. Does anyone know who Mark is and who he works for?
https://x.com/Sunset_TG/status/1860009647828271241/photo/1

https://x.com/Sunset_TG/status/1841630082529452241

Alot of tweeting that says nothing about what the product is...

Lol...

Can you just tell the board what Baron Capital is selling, or the service that it provides?


..


Buyer Beware
Pump and dump



.

here you go-- read away: https://x.com/Sunset_TG