The news is already out, so I see no reason for a trading halt.

Please shut up with the high trips bit. I'll say it again, cuz you don't seem too bright. No one wants to hear your bs. I didn't like what Chartmaster said but at least he's following logic. You're just an a hole who gets off on seeing people lose their money.

Here we go!

Charts: ES 5 min Rising Wedge--Upper T/l 5525--------SPX Wedge Upper T/L 5490 !!

But do nuns have cats????

Nothing gives me warm and fuzzies more than watching an albino vampire interviewing a creepy cat hater......
https://x.com/i/status/1817767793808257213

I just explained it to you. Fund 1 buys the offering and alerts funds 2,3+ about the offering despite being restricted against giving out that information. Funds 2,3+ then naked short before the offering running the price up. Offering hits the price drops below the strike price and Fund 1 supplies f

The media is starting to hype Debby! Way too early to predict where she will go, imo.

I don't see where tables are numbered. What page number table 3B on?

lj: That might be enough to persuade some independent voters to vote for Trump.
On another topic, they are charging $10 extra for ties for "Trumpy Bear". What is this world coming to!

Yes ofcourse. I am the one who is anxious. How is the budget coming?

https://i.postimg.cc/CztsLHGG/1.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/2qNdnkX3/2.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/yDZXJgjw/3.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/wt5XVCS2/4.jpg

I'm too tired to concentrate, but I don't really see what it has to do with naked shorting. PIPEs can be involved in toxic stuff, but generally of a much more ordinary kind.

I'll look at it again tomorrow.

Anson was the specific fund that recently received a small fine but they all work together as a family of funds involved in various short and distort schemes.

https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/administrative-proceedings/ia-6622-s

Was that Mintz's Sabby Management? If so, it's a rare example. Very rare.

Toxic funding is the real danger, though the SEC's been cracking down on the funders for the past 6 or 7 years. Why on earth would anyone go to the trouble and danger of shorting naked when he can just buy conve

Chevron is irrelevant because FHFA has very limited powers.
It was explained by the law professor Nielson, who was appointed by the Supreme Court to represent the FHFA in the Collins case.
He added that it's what makes the "for cause" removal restriction of the director constitutional.

Oh theyve definitely been naked shorting before offerings. Using a method of one or more funds buys the offering while the other funds naked short. Once the offering hits the fund that buys the offering supplies the other funds with shares to cover with.
I uncovered a conspiracy of hedge fund

Not for the last week. I was watching it. It was doing just fine until the fuckery late Thursday that filled me at .0029. Honestly I thought it was a long shot even getting in at all with that bid. But anyway there was no dumping on at all last week that I can recall except that tweet deleting garba

Where is this happening? Did you say at SI?

No, they don't. You don't just mismark tickets to short naked and get away with it for long. And most certainly ordinary chat board and social media posters don't do that.

Almost always, when a company dilutes, toxic lenders are to blame. And yes, sometimes they hire promoters to pum

A while back many r s and last one the company went up a lot after r s

Pivot Calcs: SPX Pivot--5459----R1--5488----R2--5516----R3--5545----S1--5431----S2--5402----S3--5374 !

So they got me removed as a mod and then used a bot and another account that rarely posts to take 2 spots. The others are actually active posters.

Great flipping opportunities

Precisely!