Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) (VPLM) Quote

Exactly. Pretty sure there's something more than meets the eye here.
Why would it be thrown out at the last second

Verizon will most likely be next. Like I said, binary outcome and looks like a major body blow with a right hook up next. Cut me Mick!

It is possible that this is for one particular patent only. The case is not dismissed.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

Means the judge decided that T Mobile did not infringe on the patents and owes nothing to VPLM. Deerballs as always is saying all is well.

I hate to say it but I don't trust that at all right now. That is the worst possible result of the trial. If T Mobile made a deal to pay royalties or settle in some way without holding a trial it would not have been a summary judgement of non infringement.

I am just pissed the Albright allowed the case to proceed this long. Why would it be thrown out at the last second. It is not right that we don't get an explanation.

I hope none of you guys are holding cash. This is going to break out very very soon. I’m thinking by week end. JMO

Based on the word count in the response, you struck a nerve with the NYTiot. Posters used to compete to get the longest response from her. There are some real doosies out there. Lol

Patience is a virtue. Apparently this was lost on Barbara.

$.013 Not a worry in the world...yes, even with the Summary Judgement! Relax.

"Don't worry, BE HAPPY"! 💯👏🤣

I find a large percentage of the so called longs here (or as they like to label themselves... "true longs", which by definition is silly, because the definition of being long, is simply to hold any stocks), to have an elitist attitude. In your case, let me demonstrate: you characterize your outward explanation of the value of Vplm as "espousing" , while you characterize straightwards view as "parroting" . I find that elitist and a bit disrespectful because to say someone is parroting something is simply calling them a copycat, while couching your own take in espousing implies the supporting of a cause or a way of life, which sounds a more refined endeavor. You put yourself on a pedestal as such, when both of you were simply giving your opinion on the value of Vplm.

I suppose you would characterize my well supported, factual and documented thoughts on the value of Vplm as dumb, insane, stupid, inconsequential, unsupported, ridiculous, baseless, etc., one of those or some other oft used adjective.

While true that no court has ruled on any infringement value, it's also true that the patented technology was created some 18 years ago and allegedly cost 17 or 18 million dollars and the work of some 20 voip engineers and code writers and was done for digi-phony-ca, another voip services provider, but who did not attempt to fold the tech into their platform and instead just wanted to get rid of it for cost, but sold it to vplm for some $800+k and a few millions shares, who also being a voip service provider, ALSO chose not to incorporate the tech into their 10 year established voip service providing business even after promising to do so and who then, with all the knowledge, expertise, experience that the bio's espoused, in excruciating detail, per the various army of lawyers and BOD, with all those great names like Sawyer and Candy and Chang and Tucker and Thomas and Lee, etc, whom in total, their resumes could author the complete knowledge base of voip itself and patent law...........and who we must assume applied all their knowledge into this Vplm endeavor.....and yet, in the at least 11 years Vplm has ALLEGEDLY been trying to sell, license or otherwise monetize.......THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO RAISE 2 FRIGGIN NICKELS TO RUB TOGETHER, TO DATE. AND THAT NOT ONLY CRUISING THRU 11 YEARS, BUT THRU ALL THOSE LAWYERS AND JUDGES AND HEARINGS ETC ETC ETC. NOT A DIME.

Without me looking up the formal definition of value, I'm gonna step out onto a limb and define it as something that can be put on a market and have enough need and desire to be able to sell at some price in a reasonable amount of time.

With that in mind, I submit and shout from the rooftop that all of this shows and proves that vplm has no value in terms of its product, period, end of story. If you want to try to beat it out of Vplm for yet another 10 years, have fun. Vplm has proven itself in any and sll reasonable ways........to be of NO VALUE except as a share selling scheme

The new website appears to be focused to help prospective "buyers" of this company and prospective "WallSt type" investors: all stock and financial information on a single web site. That was the first impression!

Could this be a sign of their confidence in the strength of their cases and their future business strategy? The web site provides all pertinent stock and financial data, and includes links to OTC/QB web page for additional info such as SEC filings, etc. The old lists of patents, technology highlights, IPR's, etc. disappeared or probably "buried" somewhere. They probably think such historical information may not be relevant to a prospective buyers.

Wish someone did proof reading before loading the first page.

posted today

VPLM vs TMobile
July 29, 2024 00:00

Sealed Order on Motion
Document: 272

Sealed ORDER GRANTING 136 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT. Signed by Judge Alan D Albright. (lad)

Excellent post DesktopDR!
The defendant's own analysis shows damages in the $ billions. I rest my case.

6-1-24 Reported:
Apple provided a "royalty monetization analysis overview" in which a proposed 1.25% royalty rate, when applied to the accused iPhone, iPad, and Mac products, resulted in purported damages in the amount of $2.8B. A similar analysis attached to a concurrent complaint against both AT&T and Verizon laid out damage amounts just over $1.8B (from AT&T) and roughly $2.4B (from Verizon).

Straightword, you are parroting the views of the defendants, whereas I am espousing the views of VP's damage assessment experts and legal team. Since the actual value of VP's infringement claims have yet to be ruled on in a court of law, how can you assert with any integrity that those claims are worthless? Once VP has its day in court, Voip-Pal will likely become a household name, at which time I shall be happy to "get back to you."

You are 1000% correct. So much for that "billions and billions ongoing" value of the patents huh? LOL!!

Just more cheap talk about trials that will result in nothing close to the claimed "billions ad billions ongoing" value of the patents. Get back to me when the numbers and price per share jive. Until then it's all meaningless.

I never said that anyone was delaying court dates. You're making tuff up. This stock is not undervalued. Allow me to remind you that after 10+ years that the patents have produce ZERO financial judgements for the company. The number don't lie and these patents aren't worth anything remotely what the CEO continues to claim.

You sure missed alot of dots.....but that ok, understand that's necessary in order to connect all those fallacies you've been fed, lol. Amusing

Mr.SmithJr, your explanation seems
plausible to me, as it lines up with all of the facts we have witnessed. It appears to connect all of the dots. Thank you, Sir.

@DeerBallsTheGreat Hi DB, been following you for a year or so. I know that you speak with Rich weekly. Does he ever talk about why they have not released any information to the shareholders. I thought that this was Rich's job?

I have been told by some knowledgeable people, rightly or wrongly, that cancellation of trials has to do with a dispute at pre-trial over some verbiage of patent claims judged "ambiguous" with respect to calculation of damages. It is something that can be fixed by VP but the company doesn't want to make any statements because they would need, in order not to sound like it is a major setback, to indicate their course of action, something they don't want to disclose to defendants just yet. At the same time, there is another process going on, something that DB is probably alluding to and something that started last fall but taking much longer than expected, though should finish soon... I guess. This something is taking a lot of effort in terms of manhours and funding... perhaps that is why some people who work for the company and are not paid or not paid enough are selling granted to them shares.

Well said but who knows the answer jimr1717 because NYT at times has been very accurate as you just were.

I feel it's worth repeating..... you've been saying the same nonsense for 12 years... saying this when the stock was at .008... Called it a SCAM at that time, yet didn't sell all out at .35... after it hit .35, just continued the daily whimpering.... 2 years later, didn't sell all out at .45.

honestly, what normal person does this... You could have been all out with 1000% to 3000% gains... instead just hung out and continued with the daily crying...

When called out on it, you must have felt embarrassed, b/c it just sounds so idiotic. You attempt to change history and say you weren't around during that time, yet I've posted proof that you were posting during that time...

Who's lying?

Not a basher though... I love that

Straightword, so your contention is that VP is delaying these court cases as part of a scam to bilk the shareholders out of pennies, when they could have been raking in $ billions after the trials? Do you actually believe that VP somehow caused these delays? No, it is judge Albright, not VP, who cancelled VP's trial dates. However, this in no way proves that VP's infringement claims aren't worth the $ billions being claimed by their damage assessment experts. The stock is undervalued, and that is why VP is fighting so hard to build value for the shareholders.

Are you blind or something? You were just shown the proof, the undeniable proof that vplm, in a damage estimate revision in 2017, stated that only 3 listed companies (I think it was apple, att and maybe Verizon?) were worth approx $225 billion. Mind you, that was only for 3 of the alleged infringers. Vplm had named approx 60. And I personally found more... It doesn't take a genius to immediately see how that easily translates into faaaaar more than $250 billion. Duh. I posted the facts and figures directly from Vplm. In addition to that, owning the patents, allegedly gives complete and total control over the biggest and most important communication vehicle (voip) in the history of mankind. Furthermore, it eliminates any and all competition in said field, as well as royalty income for years to come.

And you think it's not a $250 billion company value ? ? ? ? ? ?

Are you deaf, dumb and blind? I'll answer that...... You OBVIOUSLY have no clue and have not paid any attention to the facts such as I have been providing. I just posted those figures and estimates from Vplm, YESTERDAY, for cryin out loud. Duh.

* remember....the ONLY value that can be assessed or assgned to vplm is the infringement damages. THEY, THE COMPANY......HAVE NOTHING ELSE. THEY HAVE NO OTHER VALUE... AND ACTUALLY, YOU CAN ONLY SAY THE INFRINGEMENT DAMAGE ESTIMATES ARE JUST THAT, ESTIMATES.... THERE ARE NO INFRINGEMENTS SHOWN SO FAR, THEREFORE VPLM ZERO VALUE IN REALITY. ALL THOSE BILLIONS ARE JUST A RUSE TO GENERATE WISHFUL THINKING AND TO KEEP SHAREHOLDERS BUYING.

SO IF YOU ARE SPEAKING ONLY OF THE ACTUAL MONETARY VALUE OF VPLM AT PRESENT AND YOU ARE GOING BY THAT RIDICULOUS MARKET CAP FIGURE, IT'S NOTHING MORE THAN YET ANOTHER PIPE DREAM. IF SHAREHOLDERS TRIED TO PULL OUT THAT $50 million or whatever the figure is currently, it would shut down quickly.




istherenobottomtotheineptness

Response makes zero sense! This is not a $50 stock. That would be $250 Billion company. No one ever claimed such a value. Also, no-one outside this board is paying attention. The only buyers of the stock are on this board? I have a hard time believing that.

So where's my 50 cents? The pps is lower now than when Vplm began showing quotes here around 14 yrs ago. I guess Mr market doesn't know anything...

If the patents are so necessary and valuable to voip services..........then why didn't Vplm, who used to be a voip service provider, use the patents themselves??????????????

Regardless of stupid, ignorant, rude comments to such questions.......which are questions that don't get any better, no one can or will give an intelligent, fair answer to it. Because they can't. Ironically, Vplm said that was exactly what they were going to do, immediately and for the benefit of shareholders. But they lied...and didn't do it.......because the whole premise was a scheming lie, designed to sell shares and garner shareholders. It was a shining success!

That's makes you their fools.

Tucker:

Unfortunately, we cannot name the multiple S&P 500 companies with whom we are in discussions with at the chairmen and ceo levels. While we do not have a self-imposed timeline for our monetization of the IP we are making every effort to bring the most meaningful offer to the shareholders for approval this calendar year. The board has established a target price based upon an internal valuation of using accepted industry standards. However, the negotiation process - obviously - will result in the final price. The board has a fiduciary obligation to deliver the best possible offer to shareholders for approval. We remain in active discussions with several groups that have expressed interest and have requested additional data as part of their ongoing due diligence. Thank you.

VOIP PAL COM
Symbol U : VPLM
Recent Sedar Documents
Voip-Pal.Com Inc. Acquires Five Major VoIP Patents Through Acquisition of
Digifonica (International) Limited Gibraltar
2012-05-11 08:30 ET - News Release
BELLEVUE, Wash., May 11, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Voip-Pal.Com Inc. ("Voip-
Pal.Com") (OTC Pink sheets: VPLM), a leading edge international VoIP telecom
company, is pleased to announce that it has completed the acquisition of
Digifonica (International) Limited Gibraltar ("Digifonica Gibraltar"), owners of a
vast and varied VoIP patent portfolio containing revolutionary proprietary digital
voice technologies. Digifonica Gibraltar is now a wholly owned subsidiary of
Voip-Pal.Com.
The acquisition immediately advances Voip-Pal.Com as a technical leader in the
VoIP services market which had revenues of $58 Billion in 2011 and is
experiencing double digit year-over-year growth[1]. The patent portfolio will
greatly enhance shareholder value and immediately contribute to significant
revenue growth for Voip-Pal.Com as the number of mobile VoIP subscribers is
projected to reach 410 million by 2015.
By completing this transaction, Voip-Pal.Com has acquired 100% ownership of a
completely unique set of network based technologies and processes that will
enhance subscriber and carrier functionality resulting in a substantial increase of
average revenue per user. The technologies are predominantly software based,
and capable of scaling over multiple network servers, in multiple countries
worldwide, creating virtual network coverage that can span the entire globe, or a
single neighborhood – at the need and budget of the carrier. Further, the patent
portfolio provides solutions that will enable clients to meet or exceed
forthcoming regulatory and legal requirements.
"Revenues from this newly acquired patent portfolio will be derived from applying
the technology to our own operations, future royalties through licensing
agreements, and a white label program," states Dennis Chang, President of Voip-
Pal.Com. "A conservative estimate shows that potential royalty income alone
from the Digifonica Gibraltar patents may exceed $200 million per year for Voip-
Pal. Full descriptions, advantages and revenue estimates for each newly acquired
patent will be released as they are individually integrated into Voip-Pal.Com's
Cloud Server."
About Voip-Pal.Com Inc.
Voip-Pal.Com Inc. is a broadband VoIP telecom company offering local and long
distance VoIP services to consumers and business owners. The company also
provides VoIP communication and reseller solutions for its partners. Voip-
Pal.Com Inc. is the enabler of international calls using VoIP technology on the
internet, smart cell phones and PC Tablets. Voip-Pal's goal is to provide a
quality, high-speed and cost-effective telephone solution for the casual and
business international traveler who must rely on their smartphones, laptops or
tablets in order to communicate.
Retail Website:
www.pointsphone.com.
Corporate Website:
www.voip-pal.com
Company Contact:
Dennis Chang, CEO: dtchang@voip-pal.com
IR inquiries:
chanelle@voip-pal.com or info@voip-pal.com

BELLEVUE, Wash., July 11, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Voip-Pal.Com Inc. ("Voip-Pal") (OTC Pink sheets:
VPLM) is pleased to announce that in response to inquiries made by VoIP industry companies, it is
preparing to license several of the revolutionary proprietary digital voice technologies contained in the
patent portfolio recently acquired from Digifonica International (Gibraltar) Limited. The VoIP industry has
identified five specific patents which contain competitive and licensable technologies:
1. Rating-Billing-Routing engine (RBR): (Producing routing messages for VoIP communications);
2. Lawful Intercept (Intercepting VoIP communications and other data communications);
3. Enhanced 911 ("Emergency Assistance calling for VoIP communications);
4. Mobile Gateway;
5. Uninterrupted Transmission of Internet Protocol Transmissions during Endpoint Changes.
Voip-Pal is currently beta testing these technologies with several major VoIP industry providers in order
to establish a monetary value for each patent.
The licensing of these patents can create a highly profitable additional revenue stream for Voip-Pal.Com.
Dennis Chang, President of Voip-Pal.Com, states: "I am pleasantly surprised at the level of interest
shown by major players in the VoIP industry with respect to the patents held by our wholly owned
subsidiary, Digifonica International (Gibraltar) Limited. As the company finalizes integration of this
technology with our retail site, www.pointsphone.com, Voip-Pal.Com anticipates to be well positioned to
not only rapidly l gain market share in the VoIP mobile phone market but in a position to earn tens of
millions of dollars per year in licensing fees. This diversification of the revenue stream should be a
substantial bonus to our shareholders."

They want these ridiculous court dates to continue and are part of the scam and making money off of this so they don't care.

You just proved my point. If the patents are worth as claimed by the CEO the company they would be worth far, far more than this and exactly why the share price of $50 would be extremely low. That's what the numbers would bear and why this is such a farce because no one outside of this board believes it. Would be like a company claiming that they have a cure for cancer and have a price per share below .02 It just would never happen. Put the numbers together.

Don't waste your time recommending dialogue with vplm lawyers and damage assessment experts.........obviously they are part of the problem, evidenced by the fact that their efforts have produced less revenue in over a decade, than a 1 hour takeaway at my daughters lemonade stand in front of the house.

Vplm is nothing but a fiat share creating, share selling scheme. That's it, they deal in shares, period. Get it thru your head. There are sooooo many indications and proofs, of this, they can't even be counted because it's like trying to measure the size of an ever expanding universe that expands faster than the speed of light. Ya just can't keep up with it.

Here, I'll pick one at random...

If you were a voip service provider and you had the good fortune to come across and buy a set of technology patents that were absolutely necessary and foundational to the continued use and operation of your voip services business......AND....this also meant, at the same time, that ANY & ALL competitors out there would be then forced to license said technology in order to stay in the industry, meaning obviously that you owning the technology automatically made you not only king of the hill in VoIP services, but in fact it had no choice but to lead you to being a monopoly, because it had been announced and made clear, by the original creator of the technology, that IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE FOR ANY VOIP SERVICE PROVIDER TO OPERATE WITHOUT INFRINGING UPON THE PATENTS.......would you then pass on obtaining the technology or get it and sell it OR FOLD IT INTO YOUR ALREADY EXISTING VOIP SERVICE PROVIDING BUSINESS???????????

That is the question. Keep in mind that the above scenario, is ABSOTIVELY, POSILUTELY, UNEQUIVOCALLY real. It IS what vplm was faced with in EVERY ASPECT MENTIONED. It's not some made up, contrived scenario, but is actually what happened and no one can deny it.

Vplm of course did aquire the patents AND DID INDEED IMMEDIATELY STATE AND PROMISE, BY WAY OF MACHINE GUN STYLE PRs, TO IMMEDIATELY FOLD THE TECHNOLOGY INTO THEIR ALREADY EXISTENT VOIP SERVICES BUSINESS, WHICH WOULD INCREASE THEIR SUBSCRIBER BASE BY HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS AND BEGIN TO COLLECT AS MUCH AS A HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS PER YEAR IN ROYALTIES. .

There is no word twisting or anything lost in translation or exaggeration above. It is EXACTLY what they promised to shareholders and potentials. Not only that, but they repeated it over and over and over many times for between 2 and 3 yrs during the long acquisition process.

I have copies of those PRs and I have posted numerous of them here many times. They are crystal clear and there can be no mistake about any if this. THAT.....is what occurred.

Of course, this caused a huge upsurge in new shareholders and sales of shares, in a big way. It was VPLM's setup and countdown for blast off to the moon!

Imagine......having the keys to the kingdom handed to you on a silver platter. That is what happened...

But then, the biggest monkey wrench ever seen was thrown into the pot... Hard to believe, but the very next thing that happened after the huge run up in shareholders and share sales, is, [color=red]FOR NO APPARENT RHYME OR REASON, OUT OF THE BLUE, WITH NO DISCUSSIONS, NO INPUT OR PARTICIPATION FROM SHAREHOLDERS........... [ color] VPLM RENEGED! THEY DID A FULL 180. THEY TOOK THOSE MIRACULOUS KEYS TO THE KINGDOM AND TOSSED THEM INTO THE SEA. Then announced that the patents or the company was for sale...

There should have been a major protest and uprising against the company, but there was no push back at all. From reading the posts at the time, it becomes obvious that reason for no push back is that by this time, Vplm had whipped the shareholders into a frenzy with all the bullshit PR claims, which by now had progressed to where they were basically telling everyone that major deals with major buyers, ie, fortune 500 and s&p 500, etc, WAS IMMINENT! THEY MADE IT SOUND AS THOUGH THE BIG DOGS WERE BEATING THE DOORS DOWN TO LICENCE OR BUY. Make no mistake. These PRs are available to see and unmistakable. So the point is, the shareholders, in their greed, didn't care about what was just pulled on them. They had been buying and accumulating shares hand over fist. So they didn't care about anything that vplm did or didn't do... They just knew, or thought they knew (check the postings of that time period to corraborate) that they were now sitting pretty and need only wait for the big slot machine to dump fortunes into their waiting trucks and boats.

Of course it never happened. The shareholders were HAD! Big time! And they gave been hanging on to the dream ever since, because Vplm kept the ruse going on multiple levels which has always been part of the plan and explains all the inconsistencies along the way. Just as madoff had his victims strung along for all those years, so too has lord emu.

Deal with it

You seem to think the patents have been tested... Ok, show proof of testing results. If you are talking about validity testing like IPRs, then you don't know what testing means. Qualified patents are not tested patents. Fact: patents did not have to be tested or demonstrated to the USPTO examiner. Fact: digi-phony-ca and Vplm both claimed to have done testing, but test results were never disclosed. Infringement can/will never be shown. Sorry charlie. Thems the breaks. Allow scammers to get away with everything from the git, is the key. Now count the never ending monkey wrenches instead of share dollars...
Emu thanks you. Wifey thanks you. Chang thanks you. The other benefitted insiders thank you and the supporting cabal thanks you. No one has ever had any interest whatsoever in the patents.....except digi-phony-ca and Vplm. The patents themselves, like most patents, are worthless. The STORY that accompanies them is the money maker, but not for retail.

somethings gotta give..it may not matter, but emil must be at or about 70..how much longer do you think he wants this to go on..?

I’ve posted my share of the good and bad. Good luck to all Longs as we really do not know what will be the end game is as of now. This is a binary outcome in my opinion. Patents have been tested out the wahzoo! Hudnell and team have put the pressure on! Jury trials dismissed and/or cancelled or settled , ex-parte confirmation!!!! GBC keeping updated filings! I sincerely wish us all a HAPPY ENDING

Doesn’t look like you understand the post,it was tongue in cheek and that’s what it would cost to just sue Ihub to release identity of a poster under investigation,which no one would do.

better yet i love this post from numb nuts im suing ihub for 1 mil dollars exactly..because i want these peopls names exposed...listen ...if he wants my name ..np...give me an address i will gladly meet you with a beautiful italian smile and a twisted face...i love good parties...lol..load up im looking to grab another 750k shares next week..who cares...we sink or swim..welcome to the market..have a good sat and sun!

Post~of~the~Week

you forget hes the moral authority, forensic criminal investigator, deputised by the us marshalls service...and sees all...you must pay attention..:)

the ignore button really helps exclude the mindless nonsense as well

Any chance you can share with the group JUST ONE thing you've done to help bring this SCAM down?

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can you imagine spending 12 years trying to bring VPLM down. After 12 years, not ONE thing against the patents.

Your bottom line is 10 people here being Rich, the IR guy.

The top signs of VPLM being a SCAM after 12 years of work
- NO trade shows
- Expensive office chairs
- website down, means the end
- DB doesn't post for a week and half, must be on the run

I honestly get so much joy showing the stupidity. It's amazing some continue to feel comfortable posting after they have been embarrassed over and over again.

To sum it up. - VPLM spent all this time, to only promote to 5 people on IHUB. Brilliant

scrolling is wonderful you see the handle names that are wacked..keep scrolling dont even read or entertain it

DB, I always look forward to reading your post. I could use some good news. About six months ago, my prostate cancer was at a stage two and needed to be treated. I just finished seven weeks of radiation. All is very very good. The news with VPLM couldn’t be at a better time. Hopefully will hear something this week. As always, thanks for all you do and your incisive digging to get all the facts.

hes mentally ill let it go...keep scrolling

Let me guess. After 12 years of working with the feds you are finally closing in.

Just like DB being on the run last week and website down was the end of VPLM

do you know whats great about scrolling...when you see nyt and sunsptter and staightwhatever ....just keeep scrolling it works! you see the name and go bye-bye..i love t!

$.0136 I just love the consistency: I posted former damage estimates, I don't believe them, nor the company. However, I post nearly everyday, long diatribes, yet I don't believe in VPLM. Oh, but I'm invested in VPLM and want $.50/share... I think FOMO investor has gotten tangled up with our 'Scam Scholar' and has been for years.

I see Wheels is back with the manic posts. I did figure out the "our opinion". When you are a collective of pea-brains, it takes a few to come up with a whole opinion, as lame as it might be, hence "our opinion"!

Now, to VPLM: I've has no luck(previous two days), until today, of getting in touch with Rich. Said today he has been swamped with VPLM business. All good and he is anxious to get his work finished. THANK YOU, RICH, EMIL AND THE WHOLE VPLM TEAM!

I'll stick to $.75, but I was thinking. If VPLM starts to go with some MOMO(momentum) at the same time the broader market goes hinky, there will be alot of money looking for a play....MAYBE VPLM? Maybe my $.75 to be made to look like peanuts? I can hope and pray! 🙏🙏🙏

I have recently posted, more than once, facts and figures straight from Vplm, revised figures, showing far more than the $250 billion in damages for only a handful of the alleged infringers. It was from 2017 or 18. Were you aware of that? Did you READ it? Do you comprende'? Did you IGNORE it? 250 bil doesn't even come close to the value in infringements CLEARLY stated and shown by the company. Do you disagree with the company figures???

In fact, I just rechecked that info and the revised damages for only 3 companies came close to $225 billion.

I guess you weren't paying attention that day

Straightword, what the market value be at a $50 price? I’ll do the math for you $250billion…

Straightword, don't waste your time trying to convince me. Tell it to VP's attorneys and damage assessment experts. Maybe you can convince them that you know far more about these things than they do. Good luck.

Financial judgements that are in line with the "billions and billions ongoing" claims with respect to the value of the patents? That would mean a price per share of easily $50 per share and much, much higher. These are Microsoft/Google type numbers/revenues dude. It will NEVER happen!! Wake up to reality.