ADVFN Logo
Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
NioCorp Developments Ltd

NioCorp Developments Ltd (NB)

3.43
0.00
(0.00%)
Closed March 15 4:12PM

Your Hub for Real-Time streaming quotes, Ideas and Live Discussions

NB News

Official News Only

NB Discussion

View Posts
Truth and Transparency Truth and Transparency 8 hours ago
Agreed, Mark doesn’t seem to be getting much love from anyone. He had a ton of support from Nebraskans in the beginning, but hearing what Ms. Beethe had to say and the fact they haven’t held a town hall there in many years, the local support is gone. They went from having a great presence in the area several years ago, occupying an office in nearby Tecumseh, attending town halls, getting locals to invest in the project, to completely ghosting the local investor community! They have a lot of damage control to do before they ever parade their presence there again.


👍️0
NorCalTommy NorCalTommy 9 hours ago
We (shareholders) may all be paying a very high price for Mr. Smith walking away from the Molycorp bankruptcy 10+ yrs. ago- without explaining the move to their shareholders...... and shareholders almost filed a lawsuit, things must have been very heated and contentious at that time (just reading accounts of the incident back then....) Fast forward to today.........It sure doesn't seem like he gets any love from the mining community, or the financial community for that matter.......... I hope we are not all paying for that ....If we are not able to close gubmint loans with this much tailwind at our backs, then i believe we will hear VERY LOUD CRIES from the shareholder base- demanding that we sell this mine to a group who can execute on financing during these very favorable times..... the 3 month clock is ticking..... Enough is enough.....

NCT- 'waiting with many'... Yaddda...... and 'Blah blah blah....... and 'The Beat Goes On.... and on and on and on....but nothing much changes in Nio-Ville.... chugga chugga chugga chugga....
..
PS- i didnt look too hard (got lazy and grabbed a cold IPA :) ) but cursory search today didn't turn up tech fundamentals on US Rare Earths.... i'e', number shares outstanding? how close are they to production? yadddy
👍️ 1 💯 1
Truth and Transparency Truth and Transparency 10 hours ago
They ended up closing at $18.55 today and they don’t even have their processing figured out and no feasibility study!!!! What does that say about what the investment community thinks of Mark Smith?!?! Absolutely pathetic! Mark, you must have made a lot of enemies through the years.
👍️0
PutzMueler PutzMueler 11 hours ago
Thanks for the info. Right at the beginning I hear that word “sintered” manufacturer, Mark Smith agreed to help find a sintered Magnet Mfgr for Stellantis.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/video/6370046980112

Believe it or not when I first bought into the company and Mark Smith was in an advisory role before joining.

He took a trip to Texas when he became The Boss, and he made a big deal of making sure investors knew it.

I wonder if he found his Sintered Mfgr
👍️0
NorCalTommy NorCalTommy 13 hours ago
Hope so Walter... what is your best guess on where our beloved NB share price goes when financing is announced?
👍️0
NorCalTommy NorCalTommy 13 hours ago
I did notice that the today's Reverse SPAC merger seemed to work out nicely for USA Rare Earth', in their case they didn't get SPAC'led by the shareholders pulling out, they actually received the proceeeds from the SPAC ($50M+) during the process..... Maybe Mark should talk to US Rare Earth's CEO, Josh Ballard to see what he did differently to make the SPAC work... instead of of our SPACLE Debacle.... where we all bent over and watched GX Milken/Keaton Drexell Burnham disciple sharks get rich .... and not help out AT ALL with the financing for FS etc..... weasels......
NCT
👍️0
walterc walterc 14 hours ago
we will
👍️ 3
NorCalTommy NorCalTommy 14 hours ago
USA Rare Earth company featured on 'Claman Countdown'...rang the bell on Nasdaq.....woaaaa!!! ( They went public with a SPAC reverse merger with Inflection Point) all kinds of good press... stock was up 17% on their appearance today..... CEO Joshua Ballard was GUSHING!!! and why not......gosh... it's really nice to see the other junior miners out there with their day in the sun..... wonder if the faithful shareholders of Niocorp that have endured the pain and suffering of watching this NB show.... will have their day in the sun at some point.... sometime during this century would be preferable please!!

NCT
👍️0
The_Gman The_Gman 15 hours ago
No, but his 3pm ET press conference at DOJ has been delayed up to an hour. He's obviously going to talk about fentanyl but unclear if anything else.
👍️0
PutzMueler PutzMueler 15 hours ago
Heard anything yet on this?

Trump is also scheduled to sign executive orders at 12 p.m. ET, but it’s unclear which orders he’s signing. The event is closed to the press.
*********
https://www.livenowfox.com/news/trump-visits-justice-department-signs-orders-live-updates.amp
**********

https://rollcall.com/factbase/trump/topic/calendar/
👍️0
wagner wagner 16 hours ago
MP up 7 %
Not even positive earnings 
Market Capitalisation going to 5 Billions 

😕😕😕😕

👍️0
wagner wagner 18 hours ago
https://www.barchart.com/story/news/31396711/trump-wants-to-build-metal-refining-facilities-on-military-bases-this-1-stock-is-poised-to-win-big


No even positive earnings....... 



👍️0
The_Gman The_Gman 19 hours ago
E.O. 14154 The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is issuing this interim final rule to remove the existing implementing regulations for the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321

et seq.,

as amended (NEPA), in response to Executive Order (E.O.) 14154,

Unleashing American Energy.

Among other things, E.O. 14154 rescinds E.O. 11991,

Relating to Protection and Enhancement of Environmental Quality,

which amended E.O. 11514,

Protection and Enhancement of Environmental Quality,

and directed CEQ to promulgate regulations for implementing NEPA and required Federal agencies to comply with those regulations. E.O. 14154 also directs CEQ to issue guidance on implementing NEPA and to propose rescinding the NEPA implementing regulations. This interim final rule carries out President Trump's latter instruction.

See

Section II.A. As explained in Section II.B of this rule, CEQ has also concluded that it may lack authority to issue binding rules on agencies in the absence of the now-rescinded E.O. 11191. CEQ cited E.O. 11991 as authority in 1978 when it first issued its NEPA regulations. However, that Executive Order has now been rescinded, and CEQ therefore has determined that it is appropriate to remove its regulations from the Code of Federal Regulations.


https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/02/25/2025-03014/removal-of-national-environmental-policy-act-implementing-regulations
👍️0
wagner wagner 19 hours ago
Until we see multiple million loan the market stays away is everyones impression...

Might turn into the opposite one day.... 

Hope sooner than later 
👍️0
ge11 ge11 20 hours ago
Thank you President Trump!! Go NioCorp!!
👍️ 1
PutzMueler PutzMueler 20 hours ago
Not sure how far back you inquired or your specific criteria regarding CM, but there is one. From January/25

https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en-ca/knowledge/publications/7946414d/us-policy-changes-to-critical-mineral-strategy

Declaring a National Energy Emergency (EO 14159), which include new mining-related policies intended to bolster the United States’ production and processing of critical minerals.
👍️ 1
danieldeubank danieldeubank 22 hours ago
As of today, March 14, 2025, there’s no officially signed EO on critical minerals from Trump’s current term that I can confirm with a specific title or number, but there’s strong indication of one in the works. Trump announced during his address to Congress on March 4, 2025, that he would "take historic action to dramatically expand production of critical minerals and rare earths here in the USA." Reports from Reuters and posts on X suggest this EO could have been signed as early as Wednesday, March 12, 2025, or might still be pending finalization.
The anticipated EO is expected to focus on boosting domestic production of critical minerals—like copper, lithium, cobalt, and rare earths—to reduce U.S. reliance on foreign adversaries, especially China, which controls much of the global supply chain. Key elements rumored to be included are:
Building refining facilities on Pentagon bases: This would leverage military land to process minerals, emphasizing national security and bypassing some regulatory hurdles faced by private projects.

Permitting reform: Streamlining bureaucratic processes to speed up mining and production, a priority echoed in Trump’s past EOs like 13817 (2017) and 13953 (2020).

Appointing a “Critical Minerals Czar”: A coordinator to oversee this push, similar to roles created in past administrations for other priorities.

No stockpile plan: Unlike some expectations, it reportedly won’t mimic the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for minerals.

This builds on Trump’s earlier actions—EO 13817 (2017) identified 35 critical minerals and set a strategy to secure them, while EO 13953 (2020) declared a national emergency over supply chain vulnerabilities. Recent moves in 2025, like EO 14156 ("Declaring a National Energy Emergency") and EO 14154 ("Unleashing American Energy") signed on January 20, 2025, also tie into this narrative by addressing energy and mineral shortages as security threats.
However, without an official document or White House confirmation as of my last update, the EO’s status remains “pending” or potentially just signed but not yet publicized in detail. The exact scope might still be under discussion, as plans can shift before signing, per sources like Reuters.
👍️0
SagittariusA SagittariusA 23 hours ago
Haven't heard anything. However, it was a closed meeting. Thus, I am not surprised .
👍️0
wagner wagner 1 day ago
Exim??

Anyone a word from Jim? 
👍️0
The_Gman The_Gman 2 days ago
So you're confirming the accuracy of the reporting. 😂
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for NB's full-year earnings has moved 15% higher within the past quarter.
15% higher than 0 is 0
https://www.zacks.com/ZER/about.php
Zacks Equity Research combines Zacks quantitative models with the insight provided by experienced equity analysts to create superior long-term stock recommendations.
👍️0
Prudent Capitalist Prudent Capitalist 2 days ago
Good point CDH. Zacks doesn't tend to put AI stuff out but there but this does look like it has to be AI. There is a ton of it out there in terms of alleged stock analysis and reports. I completely ignore anything coming from Simply Wall St. But at least it states AI Generated by Simply Wall St. Most can start to tell when it is AI generated.
👍️0
ColdDarkHole ColdDarkHole 2 days ago
LMAO earnings? Is this more AI generated content? 15% higher than 0 is 0. 🤔

17.7% returns huh. wow. 17.7% of 0 is 0. Does anyone read this stuff before it is published? 😅

Its cool that this stuff can be found but still cringe.
👍️0
The_Gman The_Gman 2 days ago
Is NioCorp Developments Ltd. (NB) Stock Outpacing Its Basic Materials Peers This Year?
Zacks Equity Research Thu, March 13, 2025

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/niocorp-developments-ltd-nb-stock-134010471.html
The Zacks Rank is a proven model that highlights a variety of stocks with the right characteristics to outperform the market over the next one to three months. The system emphasizes earnings estimate revisions and favors companies with improving earnings outlooks. NioCorp Developments Ltd. is currently sporting a Zacks Rank of #2 (Buy).

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for NB's full-year earnings has moved 15% higher within the past quarter. This means that analyst sentiment is stronger and the stock's earnings outlook is improving.

Based on the most recent data, NB has returned 17.7% so far this year. At the same time, Basic Materials stocks have gained an average of 4.3%. This means that NioCorp Developments Ltd. is performing better than its sector in terms of year-to-date returns.
😂 1
wagner wagner 2 days ago


News 

Nooooo

Guru...... Still alive... But no really a expert 

👍️0
Prudent Capitalist Prudent Capitalist 2 days ago
I feel great Putz. How about you? P.S. I do not agree with all of the ratcheting up of tariffs and picking fights with our longtime allies and friends.
👍️ 2
ColdDarkHole ColdDarkHole 2 days ago
The only thing wrong with that is nobody would give a flying shit and most likely read the first sentence before placing it in the circular file.
👍 1
PutzMueler PutzMueler 2 days ago
What’s wrong with a good old fashion letter telling them how you feel?



How do you feel BTW?
👍️0
wagner wagner 2 days ago
Exim meeting today, connecting to niocorp..... That is the question..... 
👍️0
Prudent Capitalist Prudent Capitalist 2 days ago
I am not looking to send any message through the shareholder vote. Just responded to CDH's post. If I want to get a message to management, I will do it via e-mail, text, phone, LinkedIn, etc.
👍️0
ColdDarkHole ColdDarkHole 2 days ago
I unfortunately hope we can count on the Donald. We don't seem to have any other paths as the last decade has shown. If not for the Donald's wild administration we would still be sitting here without even this recent speculation. It appears this was NOT de-risked and there was NOT tremendous interest.
💯 1 💸 1
monocle monocle 2 days ago
What message are you looking to send?
👍️0
wagner wagner 2 days ago
You really think Mark can count on Donald? 
👍️0
Prudent Capitalist Prudent Capitalist 2 days ago
Nothing CDH. Still waiting on Trump to announce his "historic actions to massively expand critical minerals and rare earths production in America," as promised in his speech to Congress. I suspect this is being delayed in light of the repairing of the relationship with Ukraine, and with that agreement back on track, so he can piggyback them in one big announcement or ceremony. Just my suspicion
👍️0
Prudent Capitalist Prudent Capitalist 2 days ago
It is not pointless. I can send a strong message.
👍️0
ColdDarkHole ColdDarkHole 2 days ago
Yes thanks for that jab driving home that nothing anyone thinks or does matters. We already know voting is pointless. 🤣

👍️0
ColdDarkHole ColdDarkHole 2 days ago
Did something happen today? Everyone seems down today. I was at work all night.
👍 1
wagner wagner 2 days ago
I guess everyone is, but niocorp isn't. 
👍️0
Prudent Capitalist Prudent Capitalist 2 days ago
But getting rid of the independent firm in the BDO alliance that screwed up the late filings, and bringing in Deloitte was a positive move by management. But I understand. The votes are not binding and are advisory only.
👍️0
ColdDarkHole ColdDarkHole 2 days ago
Just reading some headlines heading for WW3. I wonder how much of china's minerals and alloy products are immediately available to Russia. What a pity.
👍️0
monocle monocle 2 days ago
I know it's like voting for a third party candidate in the 1984 presidential election when the outcome is a forgone conclusion but I wanted to do my tiny part to express how badly management has performed.
👍 1
wagner wagner 2 days ago
Clearly......

But the communication 

Close.. 

Trump

Historly 

We are in Washington 

.... 

👍️0
Prudent Capitalist Prudent Capitalist 2 days ago
You voted against keeping Deloitte as the CPA and auditing firm?
👍️0
ColdDarkHole ColdDarkHole 2 days ago
The 20th means nothing and will bring nothing. The meeting is a formality.
👍️0
monocle monocle 2 days ago
And the deadline to vote is the 17th. I opposed all that the company proposed.
👍️ 1 💯 1
wagner wagner 2 days ago
Hmmmm

https://www.niocorp.com/news-releases/

20th coming..... 
👍️ 1
ge11 ge11 2 days ago
PutzMueler......I don't get it????

Thanks Donald(duck)! quack, quack
👍️0
The_Gman The_Gman 2 days ago
MINERAL COMMODITY SUMMARIES 2025
U.S. Department of the Interior
U.S. Geological Survey
Version 1.2, March 2025

https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2025/mcs2025.pdf
For the 5-year period from 2020 through 2024, consumption declined for many mineral commodities indicating substitution of the material or potentially less domestic production of downstream products that required the raw mineral commodities. The largest decreases (greater than 25%) in consumption, in descending order, were for thallium, asbestos, bauxite, bismuth, industrial diamond (stones), and strontium. The largest increases (greater than 25%) in consumption, in descending order, were for indium, vanadium, natural graphite, industrial sand and gravel, platinum, niobium, and feldspar (fig. 12).
Substitutes: There is little substitution for molybdenum in its major application in steels and cast irons. In fact, because of the availability and versatility of molybdenum, industry has sought to develop new materials that benefit from its alloying properties. Potential substitutes include boron, chromium, niobium (columbium), and vanadium in alloy steels;
Events, Trends, and Issues: In 2024, U.S. niobium apparent consumption (measured in niobium content) was estimated to be 8,400 tons, an 8% decrease from that in 2023. One domestic company developing its project in Nebraska continued to secure financing in 2024. The project, would be the only niobium mine and primary niobium processing facility in the United States. According to the company, it has secured all necessary construction permits and contracted 75% of its planned ferroniobium production for the first 10 years of operation. According to the results of a 2022 feasibility study, the facility was projected to produce 7,450 tons per year of ferroniobium over a 38-year mine life.
In the United States, there is no current mine production of scandium but the polymetallic Elk Creek deposit in Nebraska contained a reserve of 2,600 tons of scandium.
👍 1
The_Gman The_Gman 2 days ago
Media Miss by the Left - Trump seeks minerals refining on Pentagon bases to boost US output: Reuters
See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean.
9 hrs ago

Interesting site shows that liberal media is completely ignoring this issue.

https://san.com/media-miss/trump-seeks-minerals-refining-on-pentagon-bases-to-boost-us-output-reuters/
👍️ 1
Nioman Nioman 2 days ago
Let's do a private placement for 5 million dollars so Marc Smith can have a one on one dinner with President Trump at Mar-A-Largo, then he can personally explain everything, Trump then only has to make a phone call to Exim to quickly get everything sorted out.
see info at this link. Invest 5 million to get 800 million :) I am in :)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/05/trump-dinner-mar-a-lago
👍️ 3
wagner wagner 2 days ago
10 years,
Only increase I see is the volume since 2020

20 years
Looks like the bottom tested and a restart is plausible 

Just my 7 cents.... 
👍️0