N
OTES
TO
C
ONDENSED
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
(U
NAUDITED
)
1. Summary of Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
References in this document to the “Company,” “Chesapeake Utilities,” “we,” “us” and “our” are intended to mean Chesapeake Utilities Corporation, its divisions and/or its subsidiaries, as appropriate in the context of the disclosure.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in compliance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and GAAP. In accordance with these rules and regulations, certain information and disclosures normally required for audited financial statements have been condensed or omitted. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2017
. In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect normal recurring adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of our results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the interim periods presented.
Due to the seasonality of our business, results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year. Revenue and earnings are typically greater during the first and fourth quarters, when consumption of energy is highest due to colder temperatures.
ARM, Chipola and Central Gas Asset Acquisitions
In August 2017, PESCO acquired certain natural gas marketing assets of ARM. The acquired assets complement PESCO’s existing asset portfolio and expanded our regional footprint and retail demand in a market where we had existing pipeline capacity and wholesale liquidity. We accounted for the purchase of these assets as a business combination and initially recorded goodwill of
$6.8 million
, within our Unregulated Energy segment. In connection with the acquisition, we initially recorded a contingent consideration liability of
$2.5 million
, based on the acquired business achieving a gross margin target in 2018. During the second quarter of 2018, we identified certain known information as of the acquisition date that was not considered in our original assessment and would have resulted in no contingent consideration liability being initially recorded. Therefore, we reversed the originally-recorded contingent liability and reduced goodwill by
$2.5 million
. We have similarly revised the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2017
. These revisions are considered immaterial to our condensed consolidated financial statements. The contingent liability will be re-evaluated each reporting period in 2018. However, our current assessment is that no contingent consideration will be paid.
In August 2017, Flo-gas acquired certain operating assets of Chipola, which provides propane distribution service to approximately
800
residential and commercial customers in Bay, Calhoun, Gadsden, Jackson, Liberty, and Washington Counties, Florida.
In December 2017, Flo-gas acquired certain operating assets of Central Gas, which provides propane distribution service to approximately
325
residential and commercial customers in Glades, Highlands, Martin, Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Counties, Florida.
The revenue and net income from these acquisitions that were included in our condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, were not material. The amounts recorded in conjunction with our acquisitions are preliminary and subject to adjustment based on additional valuations performed during the measurement period.
FASB Statements and Other Authoritative Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606)
- On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers,
and all the related amendments using the modified retrospective method. We recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard to all of our contracts as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings. The comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. We expect the impact of the adoption of the new revenue standard to be immaterial to our net income on an ongoing basis.
This standard requires entities to recognize revenue when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration that the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also requires a number of disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows. See Note 3,
Revenue Recognition,
for additional information.
The following highlights the impact of the adoption of ASC 606 on our condensed consolidated income statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2018
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2018
|
Income statement
|
|
As Reported
|
|
Without Adoption of ASC 606
|
|
Effect of Change Higher (Lower)
|
|
As Reported
|
|
Without Adoption of ASC 606
|
|
Effect of Change Higher (Lower)
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Energy operating revenues
|
|
$
|
70,504
|
|
|
$
|
70,728
|
|
|
$
|
(224
|
)
|
|
$
|
179,897
|
|
|
$
|
180,780
|
|
|
$
|
(883
|
)
|
Regulated Energy cost of sales
|
|
20,010
|
|
|
20,139
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
68,241
|
|
|
68,942
|
|
|
(701
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
9,839
|
|
|
9,832
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
19,543
|
|
|
19,521
|
|
|
22
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
9,105
|
|
|
9,207
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
45,915
|
|
|
46,119
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
2,718
|
|
|
2,746
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
12,674
|
|
|
12,733
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
6,387
|
|
|
6,461
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
33,241
|
|
|
33,386
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2018
|
Balance sheet
|
|
As Reported
|
|
Without Adoption of ASC 606
|
|
Effect of Change Higher (Lower)
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued revenues
|
|
$
|
12,353
|
|
|
$
|
13,659
|
|
|
$
|
(1,306
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
4,440
|
|
|
$
|
4,777
|
|
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
$
|
250,377
|
|
|
$
|
248,734
|
|
|
$
|
1,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The primary impact of the adoption of ASC 606 on our income statement was the delayed recognition of approximately
$204,000
in revenue in the first six months of 2018 to future years and a cumulative adjustment that decreased retained earnings and other assets by
$1.6 million
at June 30, 2018, associated with a long-term firm transmission contract with an industrial customer.
Compensation-Retirement Benefits (ASC 715)
- In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07,
Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post Retirement Benefit Cost.
Under this guidance, employers are required to report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit costs are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. The update allows for capitalization of the service cost component when applicable. We adopted ASU 2017-07 on January 1, 2018 and applied the changes in the presentation of the service cost and other components of net benefit costs, retrospectively. Aside from changes in presentation, implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Statement of Cash Flows (ASC 230)
- In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
, which clarifies how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. We adopted ASU 2016-15 on January 1, 2018. Implementation of this new standard did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.
Compensation - Stock Compensation (ASC 718)
- In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09,
Scope
of Modification
Accounting,
to clarify when to account for a change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. Under this guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions or the award classification (equity or liability) changes because of a change in the terms or conditions of the award. We adopted ASU 2017-09, prospectively, on January 1, 2018. Implementation of this new standard did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (ASC 220)
- In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02,
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
, which allows a reclassification
from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA. We adopted ASU 2018-02 on January 1, 2018 and reclassified stranded tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive loss related to our employee benefit plans and commodity contract cash flows hedges. Implementation of this new standard did not have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations. See Note 8,
Stockholders' Equity,
for additional information.
Recent Accounting Standards Yet to be Adopted
Leases (ASC 842)
- In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases,
which provides updated guidance regarding accounting for leases. This update requires a lessee to recognize a lease liability and a lease asset for all leases, including operating leases, with a term greater than 12 months on its balance sheet. The update also expands the required quantitative and qualitative disclosures surrounding leases. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for our annual and interim financial statements beginning January 1, 2019, although early adoption is permitted.
The FASB allows companies to elect several practical expedients, in order to simplify the transition to the new standard. The following three expedients must all be elected together:
|
|
•
|
An entity need not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases.
|
|
|
•
|
An entity need not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases (that is, all existing leases that were classified as operating leases in accordance with Topic 840 will continue to be classified as operating leases, and all existing leases that were classified as capital leases in accordance with Topic 840 will continue to be classified as capital leases).
|
•
An entity need not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases.
Other practical expedients that can be elected individually are:
|
|
•
|
An entity may elect to use hindsight in determining the lease term and in assessing impairment of the entity’s right-of-use assets.
|
|
|
•
|
An entity may elect to apply the provisions of the new lease guidance at the effective date, without adjusting the comparative periods presented.
|
We expect to use the practical expedients to assist in implementation of this standard. We have assessed all of our leases and have concluded that we may have some operating leases that qualify for the short-term lease exception. Upon adoption, we will record the right-of-use assets and the lease liabilities related to our operating leases with a lease term in excess of one year. We do not believe that this will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01,
Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842
, which provides a practical expedient under Topic 842 to not evaluate existing or expired land easements that were not previously accounted for as leases. We plan to utilize the provided practical expedient for existing and expired land easements and will assess all new or modified land easements and right-of-way agreements, under the guidance of ASU 2016-02, following its adoption.
Intangibles-Goodwill (ASC 350)
- In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
, which simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. ASU 2017-04 will be effective for our annual and interim financial statements beginning January 1, 2020, although early adoption is permitted. The amendments included in this ASU are to be applied prospectively. We believe that implementation of this new standard will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815)
- In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12,
Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities
, to better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. Among other changes to hedge designation, ASU 2017-12 expands the risks that can be designated as hedged risks in cash flow hedges to include cash flow variability from contractually specified components of forecasted purchases or sales of non-financial assets. ASU 2017-12 requires the entire change in fair value of a hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness to be presented in the same income statement line that is used to present the earnings effects of the hedged item for fair value hedges and in other comprehensive income for cash flow hedges. For disclosures, ASU 2017-12 requires a tabular presentation of the income statement effect of fair value and cash flow hedges, and it eliminates the requirement to disclose the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of hedging instruments. ASU 2017-12 will be effective for our annual and interim financial statements beginning January 1, 2019, although early adoption is permitted. We intend to adopt the updated hedge accounting standard in 2018, which we expect will reduce the MTM volatility in PESCO’s results due to better alignment of risk management activities and financial reporting, risk component hedging and certain other simplifications of hedge accounting guidance.
Compensation - Stock Compensation (ASC 718)
- In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07,
Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting
, which expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. ASU 2018-07 will be effective for our annual and interim financial statements beginning January 1, 2019, although early adoption is permitted. We believe that implementation of this new standard will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
|
|
2.
|
Calculation of Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
(in thousands, except shares and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Basic Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
6,387
|
|
|
$
|
6,046
|
|
|
$
|
33,241
|
|
|
$
|
25,190
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
16,369,641
|
|
|
16,340,665
|
|
|
16,360,540
|
|
|
16,329,009
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
2.03
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
6,387
|
|
|
$
|
6,046
|
|
|
$
|
33,241
|
|
|
$
|
25,190
|
|
Reconciliation of Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted shares outstanding—Basic
|
|
16,369,641
|
|
|
16,340,665
|
|
|
16,360,540
|
|
|
16,329,009
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities—Share-based compensation
|
|
47,441
|
|
|
41,542
|
|
|
49,521
|
|
|
44,029
|
|
Adjusted denominator—Diluted
|
|
16,417,082
|
|
|
16,382,207
|
|
|
16,410,061
|
|
|
16,373,038
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
2.03
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
3. Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when our performance obligations under contracts with customers have been satisfied, which generally occurs when our businesses have delivered or transported natural gas, electricity or propane to customers. We exclude sales taxes and other similar taxes from the transaction price. Typically, our customers pay for the goods and/or services we provide in the month following the satisfaction of our performance obligation.
The following table displays our revenue by major source based on product and service type
for the three months ended June 30, 2018
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Energy
|
|
Unregulated Energy
|
|
Other and Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
Energy distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida natural gas division
|
|
$
|
6,317
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,317
|
|
Delaware natural gas division
|
|
11,882
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11,882
|
|
FPU electric distribution
|
|
18,362
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
18,362
|
|
FPU natural gas distribution
|
|
18,281
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
18,281
|
|
Maryland natural gas division
|
|
4,001
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,001
|
|
Sandpiper
|
|
4,367
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,367
|
|
Total energy distribution
|
|
63,210
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
63,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy transmission
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aspire Energy
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,854
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,854
|
|
Eastern Shore
|
|
14,502
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14,502
|
|
Peninsula Pipeline
|
|
2,968
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,968
|
|
Total energy transmission
|
|
17,470
|
|
|
5,854
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
23,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy generation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eight Flags
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,230
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Propane delivery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delmarva Peninsula propane delivery
|
|
—
|
|
|
15,264
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
15,264
|
|
Florida propane delivery
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,942
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,942
|
|
Total propane delivery
|
|
—
|
|
|
20,206
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PESCO
|
|
—
|
|
|
48,798
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
48,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
(10,176
|
)
|
|
(3,248
|
)
|
|
(10,379
|
)
|
|
(23,803
|
)
|
Other
|
|
—
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
699
|
|
Total other and eliminations
|
|
(10,176
|
)
|
|
(2,743
|
)
|
|
(10,185
|
)
|
|
(23,104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
(1)
|
|
$
|
70,504
|
|
|
$
|
76,345
|
|
|
$
|
(10,185
|
)
|
|
$
|
136,664
|
|
(1)
Includes other revenue (revenues from sources other than contracts with customers) of
$(356,000)
and
$82,000
for our Regulated and Unregulated Energy segments, respectively. The sources of other revenues include revenue from alternative revenue programs related to weather normalization for Maryland division and Sandpiper and late fees.
The following table displays our revenue by major source based on product and service type
for the six months ended June 30, 2018
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Energy
|
|
Unregulated Energy
|
|
Other and Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
Energy distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida natural gas division
|
|
$
|
12,180
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
12,180
|
|
Delaware natural gas division
|
|
43,954
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
43,954
|
|
FPU electric distribution
|
|
37,103
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
37,103
|
|
FPU natural gas distribution
|
|
41,494
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
41,494
|
|
Maryland natural gas division
|
|
14,673
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14,673
|
|
Sandpiper
|
|
13,331
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13,331
|
|
Total energy distribution
|
|
162,735
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
162,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy transmission
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aspire Energy
|
|
—
|
|
|
17,931
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
17,931
|
|
Eastern Shore
|
|
30,100
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
30,100
|
|
Peninsula Pipeline
|
|
5,065
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,065
|
|
Total energy transmission
|
|
35,165
|
|
|
17,931
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
53,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy generation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eight Flags
|
|
—
|
|
|
8,608
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Propane delivery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delmarva Peninsula propane delivery
|
|
—
|
|
|
60,735
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
60,735
|
|
Florida propane delivery
|
|
—
|
|
|
11,576
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11,576
|
|
Total propane delivery
|
|
—
|
|
|
72,311
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
72,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PESCO
|
|
—
|
|
|
130,357
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
130,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
(18,003
|
)
|
|
(8,494
|
)
|
|
(25,976
|
)
|
|
(52,473
|
)
|
Other
|
|
—
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
Total other and eliminations
|
|
(18,003
|
)
|
|
(7,495
|
)
|
|
(25,589
|
)
|
|
(51,087
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
(1)
|
|
$
|
179,897
|
|
|
$
|
221,712
|
|
|
$
|
(25,589
|
)
|
|
$
|
376,020
|
|
(1)
Includes other revenue (revenues from sources other than contracts with customers) of
$(945,000)
and
$155,000
for our Regulated and Unregulated Energy segments, respectively. The sources of other revenues include revenue from alternative revenue programs related to weather normalization for Maryland division and Sandpiper and late fees.
Regulated Energy segment
The businesses within our Regulated Energy segment are regulated utilities whose operations and customer contracts are subject to rates approved by the state PSC or the FERC.
Our energy distribution operations deliver natural gas or electricity to customers and we bill the customers for both the delivery of natural gas or electricity and the related commodity, where applicable. In most jurisdictions, our customers are also required to purchase the commodity from us, although certain customers in some jurisdictions may purchase the commodity from a third-party retailer (in which case we provide delivery service only). We consider the delivery of natural gas or electricity and/or the related commodity sale as one performance obligation because the commodity and its delivery are highly interrelated with two-way dependency on one another. Our performance obligation is satisfied over time as natural gas or electricity is delivered and consumed by the customer. We recognize revenues based on monthly meter readings, which are based on the quantity of natural gas or electricity used and the approved rates. We accrue
unbilled revenues for natural gas and electricity that have been delivered, but not yet billed, at the end of an accounting period to the extent that billing and delivery do not coincide.
Revenues for Eastern Shore are based on rates approved by the FERC. The FERC has also authorized Eastern Shore to negotiate rates above or below the FERC-approved maximum rates, which customers can elect as an alternative to the FERC-approved maximum rates. Eastern Shore's services can be firm or interruptible. Firm services are offered on a guaranteed basis and are available at all times unless prevented by force majeure or other permitted curtailments. Interruptible customers receive service only when there is available capacity or supply. Our performance obligation is satisfied over time as we deliver natural gas to the customers' locations. We recognize revenues based on meter readings at the end of the month, which are based on capacity used or reserved and the fixed monthly charge.
Peninsula Pipeline is engaged in natural gas intrastate transmission to third-party customers and certain affiliates in the State of Florida. Our performance obligation is satisfied over time as the natural gas is transported to customers. We recognize revenue based on rates approved by the Florida PSC and the capacity used or reserved. Since we bill customers at the end of each month, we do not have any unbilled revenue.
Unregulated Energy segment
Revenues generated from the Unregulated Energy segment are not subject to any federal, state, or local pricing regulations. Aspire Energy primarily sources gas from hundreds of conventional producers and performs gathering and processing functions to maintain the quality and reliability of its gas for its wholesale customers. Aspire Energy's performance obligation is satisfied over time as natural gas is delivered to its customers. Aspire Energy recognizes revenue based on the deliveries of natural gas at contractually agreed upon rates (which are based upon an established monthly index price and a monthly operating fee, as applicable). For natural gas customers, we accrue unbilled revenues for natural gas that has been delivered, but not yet billed, at the end of an accounting period to the extent that billing and delivery do not coincide with the end of the accounting period.
Eight Flags' CHP plant, which is located on land leased from Rayonier, produces three sources of energy: electricity, steam and heated water. Rayonier purchases the steam (unfired and fired) and heated water, which is used in Rayonier’s production facility. Our electric distribution operation purchases the electricity generated by the CHP plant for distribution to its customers. Eight Flags' performance obligation is satisfied over time as deliveries of heated water, steam and electricity occur. Eight Flags recognizes revenues over time based on the amount of heated water, steam and electricity generated and delivered to its customers.
For our propane delivery operations, we recognize revenue based upon customer type and service offered. Generally, for propane bulk delivery customers (customers without meters) and wholesale sales, our performance obligation is satisfied when we deliver propane to the customers' locations (point-in-time basis). We recognize revenue from these customers based on the number of gallons delivered and the price per gallon at the point-in-time of delivery. For our propane delivery customers with meters, we satisfy our performance obligation over time when we deliver propane to customers. We recognize revenue over time based on the amount of propane consumed and the applicable price per unit. For propane delivery metered customers, we accrue unbilled revenues for propane that has been delivered, but not yet billed, at the end of an accounting period to the extent that billing and delivery do not coincide with the end of the accounting period.
PESCO provides natural gas supply and asset management services to customers (including affiliates of Chesapeake Utilities) located primarily in Florida, the Delmarva Peninsula, and the Appalachian Basin. PESCO's performance obligation is satisfied over time as natural gas is delivered to its customers. PESCO recognizes revenue over time based on customer meter readings, on a monthly basis. We accrue unbilled revenues for natural gas that has been delivered, but not yet billed, at the end of an accounting period to the extent that billing and delivery do not coincide with the end of the accounting period.
Contract balances
The timing of revenue recognition, customer billings and cash collections results in trade receivables, unbilled receivables (contract assets), and customer advances (contract liabilities) in our consolidated balance sheets. The opening and closing balances of our trade receivables, contract assets, and contract liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Receivables
|
|
Contract Assets (Non-current)
|
|
Contract Liabilities (Current)
|
in thousands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 12/31/2017
|
|
$
|
74,962
|
|
|
$
|
1,270
|
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
Balance at 6/30/2018
|
|
51,511
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
175
|
|
Increase (decrease)
|
|
$
|
(23,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
697
|
|
|
$
|
(232
|
)
|
Our trade receivables are included in trade and other receivables in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Our non-current contract assets are included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and relate to operations and maintenance costs incurred by Eight Flags that have not yet been recovered through rates for the sale of electricity to our electric distribution operation pursuant to a long-term service agreement.
At times, we receive advances or deposits from our customers before we satisfy our performance obligation, resulting in contract liabilities. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had a contract liability, which was included in other accrued liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet, of
$175,000
and $
407,000
, respectively, and which relates to non-refundable prepaid fixed fees for our Delmarva Peninsula propane delivery operation's retail offerings. Our performance obligation is satisfied over the term of the respective retail offering plan on a ratable basis. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we recognized revenue of $
84,000
and
$336,000
, respectively.
Practical expedients
For our businesses with agreements that contain variable consideration, we use the invoice practical expedient method. We determined that the amounts invoiced to customers correspond directly with the value to our customers and our performance to date.
For our long-term contracts, the revenue we recognize corresponds directly to the amount we have the right to invoice, which corresponds directly to our performance obligation. Our performance obligations under our long-term contracts are satisfied over time. As a practical expedient, we do not disclose information about remaining, or unsatisfied, performance obligations for these long-term contracts since the revenue recognized corresponds to the amount we have the right to invoice.
|
|
4.
|
Rates and Other Regulatory Activities
|
Our natural gas and electric distribution operations in Delaware, Maryland and Florida are subject to regulation by their respective PSC; Eastern Shore, our natural gas transmission subsidiary, is subject to regulation by the FERC; and Peninsula Pipeline, our intrastate pipeline subsidiary, is subject to regulation by the Florida PSC. Chesapeake Utilities' Florida natural gas distribution division and FPU’s natural gas and electric distribution operations continue to be subject to regulation, as separate entities, by the Florida PSC.
Delaware
Effect of the TCJA on rate payers:
As a result of the enactment of the TCJA, the Delaware PSC issued an order requiring all rate-regulated utilities to file estimates of the impact of the TCJA on their cost of service for the most recent test year available (including new rate schedules). The order also required utilities to propose procedures for changing rates to reflect those impacts on or before March 31, 2018. Our Delaware Division filed the requisite reports with the Delaware PSC on March 30, 2018. Subsequently, the Delaware Division filed an updated report reflecting the impact of the TCJA on May 31, 2018. If, after reviewing the required filing, the Delaware PSC determines to reduce our rates, it will open a new docket and establish a procedural schedule for conducting an evidentiary hearing regarding the impacts of the TCJA on our operations and existing rates.
In addition, on February 1, 2018, the Delaware PSC issued an order requiring Delaware rate-regulated public utilities to accrue regulatory liabilities reflecting the jurisdictional revenue requirement impacts of changes in the federal corporate
income tax laws. In compliance with this order, we have established a regulatory liability to reflect the estimated impacts of the changes in the federal corporate income tax rate. We believe that the ultimate impact of the TCJA on rates charged by our Delaware Division will not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Underserved Area Rates:
In December 2017, we filed an application for approval of natural gas expansion service offerings. We requested authorization to utilize existing expansion area tariff rates to serve customers located outside of the current Sussex County, Delaware expansion area boundaries that cannot be economically served under the regular tariff rates. In June 2018, we reached a settlement agreement with the relevant parties, which allows us to utilize higher rates for areas outside of our existing expansion area. The settlement agreement was presented before the Delaware PSC at its public meeting on July 10, 2018, where it was unanimously passed.
CGS:
In June 2018, we filed with the Delaware PSC an application requesting approval of the acquisition and subsequent conversion of propane CGS to natural gas located within our territory. We requested the establishment of regulatory accounting treatment and valuation of the acquisition of certain CGS, approval of a methodology to set new distribution rates for CGS customers and approval of a new system-wide tariff rate that will recover CGS conversion costs. The Delaware PSC has not reached a decision as of the date of this filing.
Maryland Division and Sandpiper
Effect of the TCJA on rate payers:
The Maryland PSC issued an order requiring all Maryland public utilities whose rates are explicitly grossed-up for income taxes to track the impacts of the TCJA beginning January 1, 2018. The order required utilities to: (a) apply regulatory accounting treatment, which includes the use of regulatory assets and liabilities, for all impacts of the TCJA; (b) file an explanation of the expected effects of the TCJA on their expenses and revenues; and (c) explain when and how they expect to pass on to their customers the net results of those effects. We established a regulatory liability to reflect the impacts of the changes in the federal corporate income tax rate in compliance with the Maryland PSC’s order. In addition, our Maryland Division and Sandpiper made compliance filings that included preliminary estimates of the annual impact of the change in the statutory federal income tax rate from
35 percent
to
21 percent
. In April 2018, the Maryland PSC ordered both the Maryland Division and Sandpiper to implement reduced rates effective May 1, 2018 reflecting the impact of the TCJA. We implemented a one-time bill credit for the regulatory liability established for the refunds and issued the refunds to customers in June. We must also submit an informational filing to the Maryland PSC within 60 days of the refund payment date. Additionally, pursuant to the Maryland PSC’s order, if in the future the Maryland Division or Sandpiper identify any additional tax savings, we must submit an additional filing to the Maryland PSC in order to return those savings to customers as soon as possible. We believe that the ultimate impact of the TCJA on rates charged by our Maryland Division and Sandpiper will not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Florida
Florida Electric Reliability/Modernization Pilot Program:
In July 2017, FPU’s electric division filed a petition with the Florida PSC requesting approval to include
$15.2 million
of certain capital project expenditures in its rate base and to adjust its base rates accordingly. These expenditures are designed to improve the stability and safety of the electric system, while enhancing the capability of FPU’s electrical grid. An interconnection project with FPL, which enables FPU to mitigate fuel costs for its electric customers, was included in the
$15.2 million
capital project expenditures. In December 2017, the Florida PSC approved this petition, effective January 1, 2018. The settlement agreement prescribed the methodology for adjusting the new rates based on the lower federal income tax rate and the process and methodology regarding the refund of deferred income taxes, reclassified as a regulatory liability, as a result of the TCJA. We have established a regulatory liability to reflect the impacts of the changes in the federal corporate income tax rate in compliance with the settlement agreement.
Electric Limited Proceeding-Storm Recovery:
In February 2018, FPU’s electric division filed a petition with the Florida PSC, requesting recovery of incremental storm restoration costs related to several hurricanes and tropical storms, along with the replenishment of FPU’s storm reserve to its pre-storm level of
$1.5 million
. As a result of these hurricanes and tropical storms, FPU’s storm reserve was depleted and is currently at a deficit of
$779,000
. FPU is requesting approval of a surcharge of
$1.82
per kilowatt per hour for two years to recover and replenish storm-related costs. At this time, no date for approval of this petition has been scheduled by the Florida PSC.
Effect of the TCJA on ratepayers:
The Office of Public Counsel filed a petition requesting that the Florida PSC establish a general docket to investigate and adjust rates for all investor-owned utilities related to the passage of the TCJA. The Florida PSC issued a Memorandum with a recommendation that, if utilities do not agree to a January 1, 2018 effective date, then the effective date should be February 6, 2018. On January 30, 2018, the Florida PSC scheduled informal meetings between its staff and interested persons to discuss the impact of the TCJA. Hearings for Florida’s electric utilities
are tentatively scheduled for the first quarter of 2019 and hearings for the natural gas utilities are tentatively scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2018.
In December 2017, the Florida PSC issued an order regarding the limited proceeding for FPU's electric division, which prescribes the applicability, timing and treatment of the implications of the TCJA, as discussed above. In June, each of our Florida natural gas operations filed a petition and testimony in support of the disposition of the impacts created by the TCJA. We believe that the ultimate impact of the TCJA on rates charged by FPU's electric division and our Florida natural gas operations will not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Eastern Shore
2017 Expansion Project:
In May 2016, the FERC approved Eastern Shore's request to initiate the pre-filing review process for its 2017 Expansion Project. The 2017 Expansion Project's facilities include approximately
23
miles of pipeline looping in Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware; upgrades to existing metering facilities in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania; installation of an additional compressor unit at Eastern Shore’s existing Daleville compressor station in Chester County, Pennsylvania; and approximately
17
miles of new mainline extension and
two
pressure control stations in Sussex County, Delaware. Eastern Shore entered into precedent agreements with
seven
existing customers, including
three
affiliates of Chesapeake Utilities, for a total of
61,162
Dts/d of additional firm natural gas transportation service on Eastern Shore’s pipeline system with an additional
52,500
Dts/d of firm transportation service at certain Eastern Shore receipt facilities.
In October 2017, the FERC issued a CP authorizing Eastern Shore to construct the expansion facilities. The estimated cost of the 2017 Expansion Project is approximately
$117.0 million
. Eastern Shore submitted its Implementation Plan in October 2017, addressing the actions Eastern Shore will undertake to meet the environmental conditions set forth in the FERC's order.
In December 2017, the TETLP interconnect upgrade was placed into service. In June 2018, the Fair Hill Loop in Chester County, Pennsylvania and Cecil County, Maryland was placed into service. With the exception of some minor facilities, the remaining segments of the 2017 Expansion Project are expected to be placed into service in various phases during the remainder of 2018.
2017 Rate Case Filing:
In January 2017, Eastern Shore filed a base rate proceeding with the FERC, as required by the terms of its 2012 rate case settlement agreement. Eastern Shore based its proposed rates on the mainline cost of service of approximately
$60.0 million
resulting in an overall requested revenue increase of approximately
$18.9 million
and a requested rate of return on common equity of
13.75
percent. In March 2017, the FERC issued an order suspending the tariff rates for the usual
five
-month period.
In August 2017, Eastern Shore implemented new rates, subject to refund, based on the outcome of the rate proceeding. Eastern Shore recorded incremental revenue of approximately
$3.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2017, and established a regulatory liability to reserve a portion of the total incremental revenues generated by the new rates until the rate case settlement is approved by the FERC and customers receive refunds according to the terms of the settlement agreement. Eastern Shore filed an uncontested settlement agreement and a motion to place interim settlement rates into effect beginning on January 1, 2018. The FERC approved the settlement agreement in February 2018, and it became final in March 2018. Exclusive of the TCJA impact, base rates would have increased, on an annual basis, by approximately
$9.8 million
.
Effect of the TCJA on ratepayers:
In March 2018, Eastern Shore filed with the FERC its revised base rates, reflecting the change in its federal corporate income tax rate. These adjusted base rates became effective April 1, 2018 and will generate approximately
$6.6 million
, on an annual basis. Any excess accumulated deferred income tax balances will flow back to customers over the period determined in the next rate case, absent any transition rule included in the TCJA or other statutes or rules that would govern the flow-back period. In April 2018, Eastern Shore refunded to its customers, with interest, the difference between the proposed rates and the settlement rates. The refund to customers also reflected the difference in rates due to the impact of the TCJA.
In March 2018, the FERC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that proposed a process to determine which jurisdictional natural gas pipelines may be collecting unjust and unreasonable rates in light of the recent reduction in the corporate income tax rate in the TCJA and changes to the FERC’s income tax allowance policies following the
United Airlines, Inc. v. FERC
decision. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposed requiring interstate natural gas pipelines to provide an informational filing to allow the FERC to evaluate the impact of the TCJA on the pipelines’ revenue requirement. In April 2018, Eastern Shore filed comments in this proceeding requesting confirmation that Eastern Shore is not required to provide an informational filing because it has already implemented lower rates in accordance with the settlement agreement in its 2017 rate case approved by the FERC. In July 2018, the FERC issued a final rule, which largely adopted the process proposed in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking requiring all interstate natural gas companies
to file an informational filing for the purpose of evaluating the impact of the TCJA and the
United Airlines, Inc. v. FERC
decision on interstate natural gas pipelines’ revenue requirements. The final rule provides that an individual pipeline has the option to request a waiver if the pre-March 2018 settlement justifies not adjusting its rates at this time. We plan to file such a request. We believe that the ultimate resolution of this matter will not have a material effect on Eastern Shore’s financial position or results of operations.
5. Environmental Commitments and Contingencies
We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing environmental quality and pollution control. These laws and regulations require us to remove or remediate, at current and former operating sites, the effect on the environment of the disposal or release of specified substances.
MGP Sites
We have participated in the investigation, assessment or remediation of, and have exposures at,
seven
former MGP sites. Those sites are located in Salisbury, Maryland; Seaford, Delaware; and Winter Haven, Key West, Pensacola, Sanford and West Palm Beach, Florida. We have also been in discussions with the MDE regarding another former MGP site located in Cambridge, Maryland.
As of
June 30, 2018
, we had approximately
$9.5 million
in environmental liabilities related to FPU’s MGP sites in Key West, Pensacola, Sanford and West Palm Beach, Florida. FPU has approval to recover, from insurance and from customers through rates, up to
$14.0 million
of its environmental costs related to its MGP sites. Approximately
$11.3 million
has been recovered as of
June 30, 2018
, leaving approximately
$2.7 million
in regulatory assets for future recovery of environmental costs from FPU’s customers.
Environmental liabilities for our MGP sites are recorded on an undiscounted basis based on the estimate of future costs provided by independent consultants. We continue to expect that all costs related to environmental remediation and related activities, including any potential future remediation costs for which we do not currently have approval for regulatory recovery, will be recoverable from customers through rates.
The following is a summary of our remediation status and estimated costs to implement clean-up of our key MGP sites:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jurisdiction
|
MGP Site
|
Status
|
Cost to Clean up
|
Recovery through Rates
|
Florida
|
West Palm Beach
|
Remedial actions approved by the FDEP have been implemented on the east parcel of the site. We expect to implement similar remedial actions on other remaining portions, including the anticipated demolition of buildings on the site's west parcel in 2018.
|
Between $4.5 million to $15.4 million, including costs associated with the relocation of FPU’s operations at this site, which is necessary to implement the remedial plan, and any potential costs associated with future redevelopment of the properties.
|
Yes
|
Florida
|
Sanford
|
In March 2018, the EPA approved a "site-wide ready for anticipated use" status, which is the final step before delisting a site. Construction has been completed and restrictive covenants are in place to ensure protection of human health. The only remaining activity is long-term groundwater monitoring. It is unlikely that FPU will incur any significant future costs associated with the site.
|
FPU's remaining remediation expenses, including attorneys' fees and costs, are anticipated to be less than $10,000.
|
Yes
|
Florida
|
Winter Haven
|
Remediation is ongoing.
|
Not expected to exceed $425,000, which includes costs of implementing institutional controls at the site.
|
Yes
|
Delaware
|
Seaford
|
Proposed plan for implementation approved by the DNREC in July 2017. Site assessment is ongoing.
|
Between $273,000 and $465,000.
|
Yes
|
Maryland
|
Cambridge
|
Currently in discussions with the MDE.
|
Unable to estimate.
|
N/A
|
|
|
6.
|
Other Commitments and Contingencies
|
Natural Gas, Electric and Propane Supply
We have entered into contractual commitments, with various expiration dates, to purchase natural gas, electricity and propane from various suppliers. In 2017, our Delmarva Peninsula natural gas distribution operations entered into asset management agreements with PESCO to manage their natural gas transportation and storage capacity. The agreements were effective as of April 1, 2017, and each has a
three
-year term, expiring on March 31, 2020. Previously, the Delaware PSC approved PESCO to serve as an asset manager with respect to our Delaware Division.
In May 2013, Sandpiper entered into a capacity, supply and operating agreement with EGWIC to purchase propane over a
six
-year term ending in May 2019. Sandpiper's current annual commitment is approximately
2.2 million
gallons. Sandpiper has the option to enter into either a fixed per-gallon price for some or all of the propane purchases or a market-based price utilizing one of
two
local propane pricing indices.
Also in May 2013, Sharp entered into a separate supply and operating agreement with EGWIC. Under this agreement, Sharp has a commitment to supply propane to EGWIC over a
six
-year term ending in May 2019. Sharp's current annual commitment is approximately
2.2 million
gallons. The agreement between Sharp and EGWIC is separate from the agreement between Sandpiper and EGWIC, and neither agreement permits the parties to set off the rights and obligations specified in one agreement against those specified in the other agreement.
Chesapeake Utilities' Florida Division has firm transportation service contracts with FGT and Gulfstream. Pursuant to a capacity release program approved by the Florida PSC, all of the capacity under these agreements has been released to various third parties, including PESCO. Under the terms of these capacity release agreements, Chesapeake Utilities is contingently liable to FGT and Gulfstream should any party that acquired the capacity through release fail to pay the capacity charge.
FPU’s electric fuel supply contracts require FPU to maintain an acceptable standard of creditworthiness based on specific financial ratios. FPU’s agreement with FPL requires FPU to meet or exceed a debt service coverage ratio of
1.25
times based on the results of the prior 12 months. If FPU fails to meet this ratio, it must provide an irrevocable letter of credit or pay all amounts outstanding under the agreement within five business days. FPU’s electric fuel supply agreement with Gulf Power requires FPU to meet the following ratios based on the average of the prior
six
quarters: (a) funds from operations interest coverage ratio (minimum of
2
times), and (b) total debt to total capital (maximum of
65 percent
). If FPU fails to meet the requirements, it has to provide the supplier a written explanation of actions taken, or proposed to be taken, to become compliant. Failure to comply with the ratios specified in the Gulf Power agreement could also result in FPU having to provide an irrevocable letter of credit. As of
June 30, 2018
, FPU was in compliance with all of the requirements of its fuel supply contracts.
Eight Flags provides electricity and steam generation services through its CHP plant located on Amelia Island, Florida. In June 2016, Eight Flags began selling power generated from the CHP plant to FPU pursuant to a
20
-year power purchase agreement for distribution to its retail electric customers. In July 2016, Eight Flags also started selling steam, pursuant to a separate
20
-year contract, to Rayonier, the landowner on which the CHP plant is located. The CHP plant is powered by natural gas transported by FPU through its distribution system and Peninsula Pipeline through its intrastate pipeline.
Corporate Guarantees
We have issued corporate guarantees to certain vendors of our subsidiaries, primarily PESCO. These corporate guarantees provide for the payment of natural gas purchases in the event that PESCO defaults. PESCO has never defaulted on its obligations to pay its suppliers. The liabilities for these purchases are recorded when incurred. The aggregate amount guaranteed at
June 30, 2018
was approximately
$72.5 million
, with the guarantees expiring on various dates through
June 2019
.
Chesapeake Utilities also guarantees the payment of FPU’s first mortgage bonds. The maximum exposure under this guarantee is the outstanding principal plus accrued interest balances. The outstanding principal balances of FPU’s first mortgage bonds approximate their carrying values (see Note 14
, Long-Term Debt
, for further details).
Letters of Credit
As of
June 30, 2018
, we have issued letters of credit totaling approximately
$5.0 million
related to the electric transmission services for FPU's electric division, the firm transportation service agreement between TETLP and our Delaware and Maryland divisions, the payment of natural gas purchases for PESCO, and to our current and previous primary insurance carriers. These letters of credit have various expiration dates through
December 2019
. There have been no draws on these letters of credit as of
June 30, 2018
. We do not anticipate that the counterparties will draw upon these letters of credit, and we expect that the letters of credit will be renewed to the extent necessary in the future.
Other
We are involved in certain other legal actions and claims arising in the normal course of business. We are also involved in certain legal and administrative proceedings before various governmental agencies concerning rates. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these proceedings will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
We use the management approach to identify operating segments. We organize our business around differences in regulatory environment and/or products or services, and the operating results of each segment are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (our Chief Executive Officer) in order to make decisions about resources and to assess performance.
Our operations are comprised of
two
reportable segments:
|
|
•
|
Regulated Energy
. Includes energy distribution and transmission services (natural gas distribution, natural gas transmission and electric distribution operations). All operations in this segment are regulated, as to their rates
|
and services, by the PSC having jurisdiction in each operating territory or by the FERC in the case of Eastern Shore.
|
|
•
|
Unregulated Energy.
Includes energy transmission, energy generation, propane delivery, and other energy services (propane distribution, the operations of our Eight Flags' CHP plant, as well as natural gas marketing, gathering, processing, transportation and supply). These operations are unregulated as to their rates and services. Through March 2017, this segment also included the operations of Xeron, our propane and crude oil trading subsidiary that wound down its operations shortly after the first quarter of 2017. Also included in this segment are other unregulated energy services, such as energy-related merchandise sales and heating, ventilation and air conditioning, plumbing and electrical services.
|
The remainder of our operations is presented as “Other businesses and eliminations”, which consists of unregulated subsidiaries that own real estate leased to Chesapeake Utilities, as well as certain corporate costs not allocated to other operations.
The following table presents financial information about our reportable segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues, Unaffiliated Customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Energy segment
|
|
$
|
67,731
|
|
|
$
|
68,815
|
|
|
$
|
173,685
|
|
|
$
|
165,261
|
|
Unregulated Energy segment and other businesses
|
|
68,933
|
|
|
56,269
|
|
|
202,335
|
|
|
144,983
|
|
Total operating revenues, unaffiliated customers
|
|
$
|
136,664
|
|
|
$
|
125,084
|
|
|
$
|
376,020
|
|
|
$
|
310,244
|
|
Intersegment Revenues
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Energy segment
|
|
$
|
2,773
|
|
|
$
|
2,181
|
|
|
$
|
6,212
|
|
|
$
|
3,389
|
|
Unregulated Energy segment
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
6,780
|
|
|
19,377
|
|
|
10,791
|
|
Other businesses
|
|
194
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
387
|
|
Total intersegment revenues
|
|
$
|
10,379
|
|
|
$
|
9,120
|
|
|
$
|
25,976
|
|
|
$
|
14,567
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Energy segment
|
|
$
|
14,304
|
|
|
$
|
14,086
|
|
|
$
|
41,015
|
|
|
$
|
37,481
|
|
Unregulated Energy segment
|
|
490
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
14,174
|
|
|
11,577
|
|
Other businesses and eliminations
|
|
(1,546
|
)
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
102
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
13,248
|
|
|
14,061
|
|
|
53,654
|
|
|
49,160
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
(1,002
|
)
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
(1,703
|
)
|
Interest charges
|
|
3,881
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
|
7,545
|
|
|
5,811
|
|
Income before Income Taxes
|
|
9,105
|
|
|
9,986
|
|
|
45,915
|
|
|
41,646
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
2,718
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
|
12,674
|
|
|
16,456
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
6,387
|
|
|
$
|
6,046
|
|
|
$
|
33,241
|
|
|
$
|
25,190
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
All significant intersegment revenues are billed at market rates and have been eliminated from consolidated operating revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Identifiable Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Energy segment
|
|
$
|
1,199,672
|
|
|
$
|
1,121,673
|
|
Unregulated Energy segment
|
|
227,191
|
|
|
259,041
|
|
Other businesses and eliminations
|
|
36,078
|
|
|
34,220
|
|
Total identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
1,462,941
|
|
|
$
|
1,414,934
|
|
Our operations are entirely domestic.
Preferred Stock
We had
2,000,000
authorized and unissued shares of preferred stock,
$0.01
par value per share, as of
June 30, 2018
and December 31, 2017. Shares of preferred stock may be issued from time to time, by authorization of our Board of Directors and without the necessity of further action or authorization by stockholders, in one or more series and with such voting powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and qualifications as the Board of Directors may, in its discretion, determine.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Defined benefit pension and postretirement plan items, unrealized gains (losses) of our propane swap agreements, call options and natural gas futures contracts, designated as commodity contracts cash flow hedges, are the components of our accumulated other comprehensive loss. During the first quarter of 2018, we elected early adoption of ASU 2018-02,
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.
Accordingly, we reclassified stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings, related to our employee benefit plans and commodity contracts cash flow hedges.
The following tables present the changes in the balance of accumulated other comprehensive (loss)/income as of
June 30, 2018
and
2017
. All amounts except the stranded tax reclassification are presented net of tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Items
|
|
Hedges
|
|
Total
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
(4,743
|
)
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
|
$
|
(4,272
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,440
|
)
|
|
(1,440
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
189
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
901
|
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income/(loss)
|
|
189
|
|
|
(728
|
)
|
|
(539
|
)
|
Stranded tax reclassification to retained earnings
|
|
(1,022
|
)
|
|
115
|
|
|
(907
|
)
|
As of June 30, 2018
|
|
$
|
(5,576
|
)
|
|
$
|
(142
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,718
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Items
|
|
Hedges
|
|
Total
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
(5,360
|
)
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
$
|
(4,878
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss)/income before reclassifications
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
837
|
|
|
828
|
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)
|
|
180
|
|
|
(1,374
|
)
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
Net prior-period other comprehensive income/(loss)
|
|
171
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
(366
|
)
|
As of June 30, 2017
|
|
$
|
(5,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
(55
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,244
|
)
|
The following table presents amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2018
and
2017
. Deferred gains or losses for our commodity contracts cash flow hedges are recognized in earnings upon settlement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of defined benefit pension and postretirement plan items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service credit
(1)
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
Net loss
(1)
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
(339
|
)
|
Total before income taxes
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
(300
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
36
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
120
|
|
Net of tax
|
|
$
|
(94
|
)
|
|
$
|
(89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(189
|
)
|
|
$
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and losses on commodity contracts cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Propane swap agreements
(2)
|
|
$
|
(181
|
)
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
(645
|
)
|
|
$
|
465
|
|
Natural gas swaps
(2)
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Natural gas futures
(2)
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
631
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
Total before income taxes
|
|
(373
|
)
|
|
708
|
|
|
(989
|
)
|
|
2,246
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
105
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
277
|
|
|
(872
|
)
|
Net of tax
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
435
|
|
|
(712
|
)
|
|
1,374
|
|
Total reclassifications for the period
|
|
$
|
(362
|
)
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
(901
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
(1)
These amounts are included in the computation of net periodic costs (benefits). See Note 9
, Employee Benefit Plans
, for additional details.
(2)
These amounts are included in the effects of gains and losses from derivative instruments. See Note 12,
Derivative Instruments
, for additional details.
Amortization of defined benefit pension and postretirement plan items is included in operations expense, and gains and losses on propane swap agreements, call options and natural gas futures contracts are included in cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The income tax benefit is included in income tax expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
|
|
9.
|
Employee Benefit Plans
|
Net periodic benefit costs for our pension and post-retirement benefits plans
for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2018
and
2017
are set forth in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chesapeake
Pension Plan
|
|
FPU
Pension Plan
|
|
Chesapeake SERP
|
|
Chesapeake
Postretirement
Plan
|
|
FPU
Medical
Plan
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
592
|
|
|
$
|
624
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
(774
|
)
|
|
(700
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of prior service credit
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
88
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net periodic cost (benefit)
(1)
|
|
48
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
55
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
Amortization of pre-merger regulatory asset
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
Total periodic cost
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chesapeake
Pension Plan
|
|
FPU
Pension Plan
|
|
Chesapeake SERP
|
|
Chesapeake
Postretirement
Plan
|
|
FPU
Medical
Plan
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
1,184
|
|
|
$
|
1,247
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
(1,549
|
)
|
|
(1,399
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of prior service credit
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
176
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net periodic cost (benefit)
(1)
|
|
95
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
110
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
26
|
|
Amortization of pre-merger regulatory asset
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
Total periodic cost
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
491
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
(1)
As a result of our adoption of ASU 2017-07 on January 1, 2018, the "other than service" cost components of net periodic costs have been recorded or reclassified to other income (expense), net in the condensed consolidated statements of income.
We expect to record pension and postretirement benefit costs of approximately
$913,000
for 2018. Included in these costs is approximately
$769,000
related to continued amortization of the FPU pension regulatory asset, which represents the portion attributable to FPU’s regulated energy operations for the changes in funded status that occurred, but were not recognized, as part of net periodic benefit costs prior to the FPU merger in 2009. This was deferred as a regulatory asset by FPU prior to the merger, to be recovered through rates pursuant to a previous order by the Florida PSC. The unamortized balance of this regulatory asset was approximately
$942,000
and approximately
$1.3 million
at
June 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, respectively.
Pursuant to a Florida PSC order, FPU continues to record, as a regulatory asset, a portion of the unrecognized pension and postretirement benefit costs related to its regulated operations after the FPU merger. The portion of the unrecognized pension and postretirement benefit costs related to FPU’s unregulated operations and Chesapeake Utilities' operations is recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss.
The following tables present the amounts included in the regulatory asset and accumulated other comprehensive loss that were recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during the three months ended
June 30, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
|
|
Chesapeake
Pension
Plan
|
|
FPU
Pension
Plan
|
|
Chesapeake SERP
|
|
Chesapeake
Postretirement
Plan
|
|
FPU
Medical
Plan
|
|
Total
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service credit
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
88
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
236
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost
|
|
88
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
217
|
|
Recognized from accumulated other comprehensive loss
(1)
|
|
88
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
130
|
|
Recognized from regulatory asset
|
|
—
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
87
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
|
|
Chesapeake
Pension
Plan
|
|
FPU
Pension
Plan
|
|
Chesapeake SERP
|
|
Chesapeake
Postretirement
Plan
|
|
FPU
Medical
Plan
|
|
Total
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service credit
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
106
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
276
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost
|
|
106
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
256
|
|
Recognized from accumulated other comprehensive loss
(1)
|
|
106
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
150
|
|
Recognized from regulatory asset
|
|
—
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
106
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
|
|
Chesapeake
Pension
Plan
|
|
FPU
Pension
Plan
|
|
Chesapeake SERP
|
|
Chesapeake
Postretirement
Plan
|
|
FPU
Medical
Plan
|
|
Total
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service credit
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
176
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
473
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost
|
|
176
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
434
|
|
Recognized from accumulated other comprehensive loss
(1)
|
|
176
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
258
|
|
Recognized from regulatory asset
|
|
—
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
176
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
|
|
Chesapeake
Pension
Plan
|
|
FPU
Pension
Plan
|
|
Chesapeake SERP
|
|
Chesapeake
Postretirement
Plan
|
|
FPU
Medical
Plan
|
|
Total
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service credit
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
213
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
551
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost
|
|
213
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
512
|
|
Recognized from accumulated other comprehensive loss
(1)
|
|
213
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
300
|
|
Recognized from regulatory asset
|
|
—
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
212
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
(1)
See Note 8
, Stockholder's Equity
.
During the
three and six months
ended
June 30, 2018
, we contributed approximately
$126,000
and
$198,000
, respectively, to the Chesapeake Pension Plan and approximately
$539,000
and
$848,000
, respectively, to the FPU Pension Plan. We expect to contribute a total of approximately
$359,000
and approximately
$1.5 million
to the Chesapeake Pension Plan and FPU Pension Plan, respectively, during
2018
, which represents the minimum annual contribution payments required.
The Chesapeake SERP, the Chesapeake Postretirement Plan and the FPU Medical Plan are unfunded and are expected to be paid out of our general funds. Cash benefits paid under the Chesapeake SERP
for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2018
, were approximately
$38,000
and
$76,000
, respectively. We expect to pay total cash benefits of approximately
$151,000
under the Chesapeake SERP in
2018
. Cash benefits paid under the Chesapeake Postretirement Plan, primarily for medical claims
for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2018
, were approximately
$7,000
and
$18,000
, respectively. We estimate that approximately
$97,000
will be paid for such benefits under the Chesapeake Postretirement Plan in
2018
. Cash benefits paid under the FPU Medical Plan, primarily for medical claims for the
three and six months
ended
June 30, 2018
, were approximately
$13,000
and
$24,000
, respectively. We estimate that approximately
$88,000
will be paid for such benefits under the FPU Medical Plan in
2018
.
The investment balances at
June 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
June 30,
2018
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
Rabbi trust (associated with the Deferred Compensation Plan)
|
$
|
7,465
|
|
|
$
|
6,734
|
|
Investments in equity securities
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
Total
|
$
|
7,486
|
|
|
6,756
|
|
We classify these investments as trading securities and report them at their fair value.
For the three months ended June 30,
2018
and
2017
, we recorded a net unrealized loss of approximately $
158,000
and a net unrealized gain of approximately
$181,000
, respectively, in other expense, net in the condensed consolidated statements of income related to these investments.
For the six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
, we recorded a net unrealized loss of approximately
$113,000
and a net unrealized gain of approximately
$433,000
, respectively, in other expense, net in the condensed consolidated statements of income related to these investments. For the investment in the Rabbi Trust, we also have recorded an associated liability, which is included in other pension and benefit costs in the consolidated balance sheets and is adjusted each period for the gains and losses incurred by the investments in the Rabbi Trust.
|
|
11.
|
Share-Based Compensation
|
Our non-employee directors and key employees are granted share-based awards through our SICP. We record these share-based awards as compensation costs over the respective service period for which services are received in exchange for an award of equity or equity-based compensation. The compensation cost is based primarily on the fair value of the shares awarded, using the estimated fair value of each share on the date it was granted and the number of shares to be issued at the end of the service period.
The table below presents the amounts included in net income related to share-based compensation expense
for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards to non-employee directors
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
271
|
|
Awards to key employees
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
541
|
|
Total compensation expense
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
2,844
|
|
|
812
|
|
Less: tax benefit
|
|
(363
|
)
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
(779
|
)
|
|
(327
|
)
|
Share-based compensation amounts included in net income
|
|
$
|
962
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
2,065
|
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
Non-employee Directors
Shares granted to non-employee directors are issued in advance of the directors’ service periods and are fully vested as of the grant date. We record a prepaid expense equal to the fair value of the shares issued and amortize the expense equally over a
one
-year service period. In May 2018, each of our non-employee directors received an annual retainer of
792
shares of common stock under the SICP for service as a director through the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The table below presents the summary of the stock activity for awards to non-employee directors
for the six months ended
June 30, 2018
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Weighted Average
Fair Value
|
Outstanding—December 31, 2017
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Granted
|
|
7,128
|
|
|
$
|
75.70
|
|
Vested
|
|
(7,128
|
)
|
|
$
|
75.70
|
|
Outstanding—June 30, 2018
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
At
June 30, 2018
, there was approximately
$450,000
of unrecognized compensation expense related to these awards. This expense will be recognized over the directors' remaining service periods ending April 30, 2019. See Note 1,
Summary of Accounting Policies
, for additional information regarding ASU 2018-07 and its impact on the accounting for non-employee share-based payments.
Key Employees
The table below presents the summary of the stock activity for awards to key employees
for the six months ended
June 30, 2018
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Weighted Average
Fair Value
|
Outstanding—December 31, 2017
|
|
132,642
|
|
|
$
|
59.31
|
|
Granted
|
|
49,494
|
|
|
$
|
67.76
|
|
Vested
|
|
(29,786
|
)
|
|
$
|
47.39
|
|
Vested - Accelerated pursuant to separation agreement
(1)
|
|
(16,676
|
)
|
|
$
|
75.78
|
|
Expired
|
|
(3,933
|
)
|
|
$
|
49.66
|
|
Outstanding—June 30, 2018
|
|
131,741
|
|
|
$
|
67.46
|
|
(1)
Includes 2,569 shares that were forfeited.
In February 2018, our Board of Directors granted awards of
49,494
shares of common stock to key employees under the SICP. The shares granted are multi-year awards that will vest at the end of the
three
-year service period ending December 31, 2020. All of these stock awards are earned based upon the successful achievement of long-term financial results, which comprise market-based and performance-based conditions or targets. The fair value of each performance-
based condition or target is equal to the market price of our common stock on the grant date of each award. For the market-based conditions, we used the Black-Scholes pricing model to estimate the fair value of each market-based award granted.
In March 2018, upon the election of certain of our executive officers, we withheld shares with a value at least equivalent to each such executive officer’s minimum statutory obligation for applicable income and other employment taxes related to shares that we awarded for the performance period ended December 31, 2017, remitted the cash to the appropriate taxing authorities, and paid the balance of such awarded shares to each such executive officer. We withheld
10,436
shares, based on the value of the shares on their award date, determined by the average of the high and low prices of our common stock. Total combined payments for the employees’ tax obligations to the taxing authorities were approximately
$719,000
.
In June 2018, the Company and a former executive officer entered into a separation agreement and release (the "Separation Agreement"). Pursuant to the Separation Agreement,
three
awards, representing a total of
14,107
shares of common stock previously granted to the executive officer under the SICP, immediately vested at the time of separation, and an additional
2,569
shares were forfeited. We settled the awards that vested in cash and recognized
$1.1 million
as share-based compensation expense.
At
June 30, 2018
, the aggregate intrinsic value of the SICP awards granted to key employees was approximately
$10.5 million
. At
June 30, 2018
, there was approximately
$3.2 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to these awards, which is expected to be recognized from 2018 through 2020.
Stock Options
We did not have any stock options outstanding at
June 30, 2018
or
2017
, nor were any stock options issued during these periods.
|
|
12.
|
Derivative Instruments
|
We use derivative and non-derivative contracts to engage in trading activities and manage risks related to obtaining adequate supplies and the price fluctuations of natural gas, electricity and propane. Our natural gas, electric and propane distribution operations have entered into agreements with suppliers to purchase natural gas, electricity and propane for resale to our customers. Aspire Energy has entered into contracts with producers to secure natural gas to meet its obligations. Purchases under these contracts typically either do not meet the definition of derivatives or are considered “normal purchases and normal sales” and are accounted for on an accrual basis. Our propane distribution and natural gas marketing operations may also enter into fair value hedges of their inventory or cash flow hedges of their future purchase commitments in order to mitigate the impact of wholesale price fluctuations. As of
June 30, 2018
, our natural gas and electric distribution operations did not have any outstanding derivative contracts.
Hedging Activities in 2018
PESCO enters into natural gas futures contracts associated with the purchase and sale of natural gas to specific customers. These contracts are effective through March 2022, and we designate and account for them as cash flow hedges. There is no ineffective portion of these hedges. At
June 30, 2018
, PESCO had a total of
16.9 million
Dts hedged under natural gas futures contracts, with a liability fair value of approximately
$779,000
. The change in fair value of the natural gas futures contracts is recorded as unrealized gain (loss) in other comprehensive income (loss).
In June 2018, Sharp entered into futures and swap agreements to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in wholesale propane index prices associated with
1.4 million
gallons of propane expected to be purchased from August 2018 through June 2021. Under the futures and swap agreements, Sharp will receive the difference between the index prices (Mont Belvieu prices in August 2018 through June 2021) and the swap prices of
$0.76
to
$0.875
per gallon, to the extent the index price exceeds the contracted prices. If the index prices are lower than the swap prices, Sharp will pay the difference. At
June 30, 2018
, the futures and swap agreements had a fair value asset of approximately
$18,000
and a fair value liability of
$30,000
. The change in the fair value of the swap agreements is recorded as unrealized gain (loss) in other comprehensive income (loss).
Hedging Activities in 2017
In 2017, Sharp entered into futures and swap agreements to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in wholesale propane index prices associated with
7.7 million
gallons of propane expected to be purchased from October 2017 through March 2019, of which positions covering
1.4 million
gallons of forecasted future purchases were outstanding as of
June 30, 2018
. Under the futures and swap agreements, Sharp will receive the difference between the index prices (Mont Belvieu prices in October 2017 through March 2019) and the swap prices of
$0.59
per gallon, to the extent the index price exceeds the contracted price. If the index prices are lower than the swap prices, Sharp will pay the difference. Sharp received
approximately
$645,000
, which represented the difference between the index prices and the contracted prices in 2018 related to hedging activities originated in 2017 and received
$11,000
, which represented the mark-to-market activities for the three months ended
June 30, 2018
. At
June 30, 2018
, the futures and swap agreements had a fair value asset of approximately
$306,000
. The change in the fair value of the swap agreements is recorded as unrealized gain (loss) in other comprehensive income (loss).
In August 2017, PESCO entered into natural gas swap agreements associated with financial contracts acquired in the ARM acquisition to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in wholesale natural gas prices associated with
844,000
Dts of natural gas PESCO expects to purchase through January 2020. We accounted for these swap agreements as cash flow hedges, which have a fair value liability of approximately
$120,000
at
June 30, 2018
. The change in fair value of the natural gas swap agreements is recorded as unrealized gain (loss) in other comprehensive income (loss).
The impact of PESCO's financial instruments that were not designated as hedges in our consolidated financial statements as of
June 30, 2018
was a fair value asset of
$90,000
and fair value liability of
$77,000
, respectively, which was recorded as an increase in gas costs during the six months ended June 30, 2018 associated with
1.1 million
and
512,500
Dts of natural gas, respectively.
Balance Sheet Offsetting
PESCO has entered into master netting agreements with counterparties that enable it to net the counterparties' outstanding accounts receivable and payable, which are presented on a net basis in the consolidated balance sheets. The following table summarizes the accounts receivable and payable on a gross and net basis at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2018
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Gross amounts
|
|
Amounts offset
|
|
Net amounts
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
5,723
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
$
|
4,435
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
10,326
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
$
|
9,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2017
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Gross amounts
|
|
Amounts offset
|
|
Net amounts
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
8,283
|
|
|
$
|
2,391
|
|
|
$
|
5,892
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
16,643
|
|
|
$
|
2,391
|
|
|
$
|
14,252
|
|
The following tables present information about the fair value and related gains and losses of our derivative contracts. We did not have any derivative contracts with a credit risk-related contingency.
The fair values of the derivative contracts recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of
June 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value As Of
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Propane swap agreements
|
|
Derivative assets, at fair value
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Natural gas futures contracts
|
|
Derivative assets, at fair value
|
|
90
|
|
|
—
|
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas futures contracts
|
|
Derivative assets, at fair value
|
|
120
|
|
|
92
|
|
Propane swap agreements
|
|
Derivative assets, at fair value
|
|
324
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
Total asset derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
534
|
|
|
$
|
1,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value As Of
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas futures contracts
|
|
Derivative liabilities, at fair value
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
5,776
|
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas futures contracts
|
|
Derivative liabilities, at fair value
|
|
779
|
|
|
469
|
|
Natural gas swap contracts
|
|
Derivative liabilities, at fair value
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
Propane swap agreements
|
|
Derivative liabilities, at fair value
|
|
30
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total liability derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
886
|
|
|
$
|
6,247
|
|
The effects of gains and losses from derivative instruments on the condensed consolidated financial statements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives:
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
|
(in thousands)
|
|
(Loss) on Derivatives
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gain on forward contracts and options
(1)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
Natural gas futures contracts
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
497
|
|
|
(2,963
|
)
|
|
621
|
|
Propane swap agreements
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Derivatives designated as fair value hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Put /Call option
(2)
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Propane swap agreements
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
77
|
|
|
(645
|
)
|
|
465
|
|
Propane swap agreements
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
106
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
(775
|
)
|
Natural gas futures contracts
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
631
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
Natural gas swap contracts
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Natural gas swap contracts
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
523
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
—
|
|
Natural gas futures contracts
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
861
|
|
|
(1,211
|
)
|
|
(871
|
)
|
|
(124
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
|
$
|
(224
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,134
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
All of the realized and unrealized gain (loss) on forward contracts represents the effect of trading activities on our condensed consolidated statements of income.
|
|
|
(2)
|
As a fair value hedge with no ineffective portion, the unrealized gains and losses associated with this call option are recorded in cost of sales, offset by the corresponding change in the value of propane inventory (hedged item), which is also recorded in cost of sales. The amounts in cost of sales offset to zero, and the unrealized gains and losses of this put option effectively changed the value of propane inventory on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
|
13.
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are the following:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and
Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques requiring inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported by little or no market activity).
Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the fair value measurements, by level, within the fair value hierarchy as of
June 30, 2018
and
December 31, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using:
|
As of June 30, 2018
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)
|
|
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments—equity securities
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Investments—guaranteed income fund
|
|
671
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
671
|
|
Investments—mutual funds and other
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total investments
|
|
7,486
|
|
|
6,815
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
671
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
534
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
8,020
|
|
|
$
|
6,815
|
|
|
$
|
534
|
|
|
$
|
671
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
886
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
886
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using:
|
As of December 31, 2017
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)
|
|
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments—equity securities
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Investments—guaranteed income fund
|
|
648
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
648
|
|
Investments—mutual funds and other
|
|
6,086
|
|
|
6,086
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total investments
|
|
6,756
|
|
|
6,108
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
648
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
8,042
|
|
|
$
|
6,108
|
|
|
$
|
1,286
|
|
|
$
|
648
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
6,247
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,247
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The following valuation techniques were used to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities in the tables above:
Level 1 Fair Value Measurements:
Investments - equity securities
— The fair values of these trading securities are recorded at fair value based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Investments - mutual funds and other
— The fair values of these investments, comprised of money market and mutual funds, are recorded at fair value based on quoted net asset values of the shares.
Level 2 Fair Value Measurements:
Derivative assets and liabilities —
The fair values of forward contracts are measured using market transactions in either the listed or OTC markets. The fair value of the propane put/call options, swap agreements and natural gas futures contracts are measured using market transactions for similar assets and liabilities in either the listed or OTC markets.
Level 3 Fair Value Measurements:
Investments - guaranteed income fund
— The fair values of these investments are recorded at the contract value, which approximates their fair value.
The following table sets forth the summary of the changes in the fair value of Level 3 investments
for the six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
$
|
648
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
Purchases and adjustments
|
54
|
|
|
65
|
|
Transfers
|
(24
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Distribution
|
(12
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Investment income
|
5
|
|
|
4
|
|
Ending Balance
|
$
|
671
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
Investment income from the Level 3 investments is reflected in other expense, (net) in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.
At
June 30, 2018
, there were no non-financial assets or liabilities required to be reported at fair value. We review our non-financial assets for impairment at least on an annual basis, as required.
Other Financial Assets and Liabilities
Financial assets with carrying values approximating fair value include cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Financial liabilities with carrying values approximating fair value include accounts payable and other accrued liabilities and short-term debt. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents is measured using the comparable value in the active market and approximates its carrying value (Level 1 measurement). The fair value of short-term debt approximates the carrying value due to its short maturities and because interest rates approximate current market rates (Level 3 measurement). At
June 30, 2018
, long-term debt, including current maturities but excluding a capital lease obligation, had a carrying value of approximately
$250.7 million
. This compares to a fair value of approximately
$250.3 million
, using a discounted cash flow methodology that incorporates a market interest rate based on published corporate borrowing rates for debt instruments with similar terms and average maturities, and with adjustments for duration, optionality, and risk profile. At
December 31, 2017
, long-term debt, including the current maturities but excluding a capital lease obligation, had a carrying value of approximately
$205.2 million
, compared to the estimated fair value of approximately
$215.4 million
. The valuation technique used to estimate the fair value of long-term debt would be considered a Level 3 measurement.
Our outstanding long-term debt is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
FPU secured first mortgage bonds
(1)
:
|
|
|
|
|
9.08% bond, due June 1, 2022
|
|
$
|
7,984
|
|
|
$
|
7,982
|
|
Uncollateralized senior notes:
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% note, due October 12, 2020
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
5.93% note, due October 31, 2023
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
5.68% note, due June 30, 2026
|
|
23,200
|
|
|
26,100
|
|
6.43% note, due May 2, 2028
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
3.73% note, due December 16, 2028
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
3.88% note, due May 15, 2029
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
3.25% note, due April 30, 2032
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
3.48% note, due May 31, 2038
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
Promissory notes
|
|
26
|
|
|
97
|
|
Capital lease obligation
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
Less: debt issuance costs
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
(433
|
)
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
251,573
|
|
|
206,816
|
|
Less: current maturities
|
|
(9,977
|
)
|
|
(9,421
|
)
|
Total long-term debt, net of current maturities
|
|
$
|
241,596
|
|
|
$
|
197,395
|
|
(1)
FPU secured first mortgage bonds are guaranteed by Chesapeake Utilities.
In January 2018, we borrowed an additional
$25.0 million
under the Revolver, which we classified as long-term debt due to the stated maturity date of October 8, 2020. In May 2018, we utilized a portion of the proceeds from the issuance of
$50.0 million
of
3.48%
Series A notes to repay the
$25.0 million
of long-term debt borrowed under the Revolver. For additional information regarding the issuance of the Series A notes, see "Shelf Agreements" below.
Shelf Agreements
In October 2015, we entered into the
$150.0 million
Prudential Shelf Agreement, under which we may request that Prudential purchase up to
$150.0 million
of our unsecured senior debt. As of June 30, 2018, we have issued
$70.0 million
of
3.25%
Prudential Shelf Notes.
In March 2017, we entered into the MetLife Shelf Agreement and the NYL Shelf Agreement, under which we may request that MetLife and NYL, through March 2, 2020, purchase up to
$150.0 million
of Met Life Shelf Notes and
$100.0 million
NYL Shelf Notes, respectively. The unsecured senior debt would have a fixed interest rate and a maturity date not to exceed
20 years
from the date of issuance. MetLife and NYL are under no obligation to purchase any unsecured senior debt. The interest rate and terms of payment of any series of unsecured senior debt will be determined at the time of purchase.
In November 2017, NYL agreed to purchase
$50.0 million
of
3.48%
Series A notes and
$50.0 million
of
3.58%
Series B notes. The Series A notes were issued in May 2018 and the Series B notes will be issued on or before November 20, 2018. The proceeds received from the issuances of these NYL Shelf Notes will be used to reduce borrowings under the Revolver and/or lines of credit and/or to fund capital expenditures. The NYL Shelf Agreement has been fully utilized.
As of June 30, 2018, we have
$230.0 million
of additional potential borrowing capacity under the Prudential and MetLife Shelf Agreements. The Prudential Shelf Agreement and the NYL Shelf Agreement set forth certain business covenants to which we are subject when any note is outstanding, including covenants that limit or restrict our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to incur indebtedness, or place or permit liens and encumbrances on any of our property or the property of our subsidiaries.