CrowdStrike Holdings Inc (CRWD) Quote

Tried to ride out the strom, but it's time to let this bad boy go!

no true green, by 3rdQ this going to $150,
they have to pay billions to its customers for their loss in addition to win back trust

PT 50$

Thank God my puts sold this morning near bottom, while driving.

If I was at a computer I would have bought calls, I think that was the low. Too risky to enter here imo

nice job this was Friday yes? what strike did you do and entry exit? I got $300 calls for $6 sold them at $7 and yes like you said 15 min later they were $15 smh

Off shore Indians managing American IT is the single most egregious act being done against America. Indian oligarchs who own these companies are putting lives at risk. CrowdStrike must suffer massive consequences. It is inconceivable for any American company that takes security seriously to hand their IT assets into the hands of unvetted $4.00/hr Indians. Wake up America. Off shore Indian IT support is the most epic fail in every aspect of security and safety. Stop using Indian off shore companies. Stop. Stop. Stop!!!!

Well I guess those calls didn’t work lol

lol ooooops

This company is horrific. Don’t give them a god damn dime.

Looking for an upstart cyber company to invest in.... sdch

You’re absolutely right! I suck at pulling the trigger at the correct time.

Since the crash a few years ago I have picked some pretty good companies but never get it right for profits

Too old to learn new things

I’m sure the contracts have some kind of protection in them. However, this issue was pretty catastrophic. Some companies are huge with deep pockets to get them caught into litigations for years. The US airlines could join forces in a class action lawsuit. They will have some big guns coming after them. Just watch.

Apparently their contracts are pretty airtight and protect them from most lawsuits but for sure some will try.

Wait till all on the liability lawsuits that will be coming in from all the lost money these big companies suffered. They will be lucky if they can survive.

Profits are worthless unless they are taken

$CRWD weekend overtime is authorized!!!

was dropping before today..someone knew

I made a ton on calls this morning literally holding for about 15 minutes. The “normalized” chart points to a price around $346 ish. I believe it will head that way when the dust settles. I have 350 calls for next week. Fingers crossed.

Might be a buy here…

I bought it at 110.00

Not selling yet

Remember when Pelosi bought this cheap…. The clown

Another possible AI play? This looks like real possibility for exponential growth, thinking of taking a shot

Respectable.
For the first quarter ended April 30, CrowdStrike reported revenue of $921 million, above analysts' estimates of $904.7 million.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/crowdstrike-forecasts-upbeat-second-quarter-212734854.html

Beer money

$ , MY OPINION ONLY , CUP AND HANDLE HERE LOOKS LIKE ABOVE $363 TO $448

CrowdStrike Collaborates with NVIDIA to Advance Cybersecurity with Generative AI
March 18 2024 - 06:00PM
Business Wire

Companies join forces to bring LLM-powered applications to the enterprise, unleashing the power of the CrowdStrike Falcon® XDR platform data with NVIDIA AI Software, including new NVIDIA NIM microservices

CrowdStrike (NASDAQ: CRWD) today announced a strategic collaboration with NVIDIA to deliver NVIDIA’s AI computing services on the industry-leading AI-native CrowdStrike Falcon® XDR platform. Combining Falcon platform data with NVIDIA’s GPU-optimized AI pipelines and software, including new NVIDIA NIM microservices, puts custom and secure generative AI model creation in the hands of CrowdStrike and NVIDIA customers.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/NASDAQ/crowdstrike-CRWD/stock-news/93508282/crowdstrike-collaborates-with-nvidia-to-advance-cy

$CRWD Another beautiful green day!

Just think of the clowns that sold today before earnings. I cant fathom why BB stock is so far in the gutter. Shat management they should sell to crowdstrike

CRWD 10Q March 5

CRWD new 52=week high

CRWD new 52 week high

CRWD new 52 week high

CRWD new 52 week high

CRWD new 52 week high

CRWD new 52 week high

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. $CRWD Total Debt (mrq) $794.37M Book Value Per Share (mrq) $6.77

CEO sold 59465 shares. Hmmmmm! This guy is a multi-billionaire. Why is he selling shares worth over $8M?

There's a $1.8 Trillion Gap in This Market -- 2 Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/there-s-a-1-8-trillion-gap-in-this-market-2-stocks-to-buy-hand-over-fist/ar-AA19E0OA?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=4c192a483c214747b6383da5b13f4639&ei=97

Nice call.

$CRWD $101.90 looks good for a bounce

Cybersecurity sell off has been overdone, imo.

Are you short term or long? Stop loss??

Hmmm. Hit 108 today

buyer $180..no end to cyber theft, money/bitcoin/data, so on..CRDW$...

The larger cybersecurity companies have done well over the past two years. And cyber insurance rates are going up--further supporting companies' decision to budget for better and more effective cyber defenses.

$CRWD is one of 7 Cybersecurity Stocks to Watch in Light of the Google-Mandiant Deal according to Investor Place

https://investorplace.com/2022/03/7-cybersecurity-stocks-to-watch-in-light-of-the-google-mandiant-deal/

$CRWD $212 easy buy down here

will this stock ever split

CrowdStrike > CRWD > shares are trading higher after Nasdaq announced the company will join the NASDAQ-100 Index beginning August 26, 2021. The stock could also be trading higher in sympathy with peer Palo Alto Networks after the company reported better-than-expected financial results and issued guidance above estimates.

3 Cybersecurity Myths to Bust

Deeply rooted cybersecurity misconceptions are poisoning our ability to understand and defend against attacks.
"Every lie is a poison; there are no harmless lies." Leo Tolstoy said this over 100 years ago, and who am I to argue with the great author? His observation holds as true today as ever — in many aspects in life, including cybersecurity.

I attend many cybersecurity presentations in my work, and one thing that has bothered me the past several years is the (over)use of clichés, myths, and misconceptions. There are many cybersecurity myths out there, but the three that are the most deeply rooted in the cybersecurity world (and therefore are the most "poisonous," as Tolstoy would say,) relate to People, Process, and Technology.

Myth #1: Sophisticated Threat Actors Use Sophisticated Tools
One misconception I run into a lot is the notion that sophisticated nation-state actors always use sophisticated cyberweapons when they breach organizations. While threat actors may indeed use zero-day exploits and advanced techniques to breach systems and access networks, in almost all cases, the initial vector is a (relatively) simple attack against humans. Why? Several reasons: a) it works, b) it's very cost-effective, and c) it's much harder to attribute. When attackers use an advanced capability like a zero-day exploit, they have a higher risk of being attributed to the attack. After all, there are only so many organizations that can develop or purchase zero days.

On the other hand, a relatively simple attack against a person, using a combination of social engineering techniques and open source intelligence (OSINT) can yield devastating results. Some of the most notorious breaches started just like that: the RSA hack, the Sony hack, the Associated Press hack, the Target hack, the DNC hack … and the list goes on.

In 2018, Verizon estimated that 33% of all breaches start with a social engineering attack. This is a very conservative estimate. Some researchers estimate the number to be closer to 90%. While security vendors push for more products, we must remember that not all cybersecurity gaps are technological. Most are related to people.

Myth #2: Attackers Need to Be Right Only Once; Defenders Must Be Right All the Time
I probably hear this process-related misconception the most. Claiming that an attacker needs to be right only once oversimplifies an attack life cycle from the point-solution vendor's point of view. In actuality, the attacker has to be right many times, and the defender has many opportunities to detect, mitigate, or prevent the attack.

To illustrate this, I suggest looking at the MITRE ATT&CK framework. For virtually any threat actor or attack type, the ATT&CK Navigator shows multiple techniques that can be used as part of the 14 tactics. Pick, for example, REvil ransomware. Notice how many different actions the attacker takes from Initial Access to Impact. The attackers don't have to be right once; they have to be right many times. The defenders will remain unaware of the attack if they miss all these opportunities to detect it.

True, the attackers likely will not give up if one technique fails or is stopped, and sophisticated threat actors are nearly impossible to stop. However, there is a lot to be said about early detection, attack mitigation, and incident response time. Saying that the attacker needs to be right only once is an easy out. We can do better than that if we break the siloed view.

Myth #3: You Need More Security Products to Stop All the New Threats
In terms of technology, we are learning the hard way that less is more. (Why not use a cliché to refute a cliché?) The average organization has 50 to 80 security products, yet most of them don't communicate with each other, some are partially integrated, and together they create huge management and monitoring burdens on security teams. Analysts and researchers suffer from alert and monitor fatigue, and there are good reasons practitioners in all disciplines are looking for easy-to-use, converged systems.

Vendor overload is directly related to the People and Process myths above. More chief information security officers (CISOs) are looking to cut back on the number of solutions they have while maintaining their security capabilities and operational readiness. This can be backtracked to the layered-security approach: The notion is true; you do need multiple layers for defense. Yet this does NOT mean you need more and more disparate systems to achieve it! The number of systems that analysts need to work with has become a burden. We don't need more tech — we need smarter, easier-to-use tech. We need to develop muscle, not fat.

It's Time to Bust These Myths for Good

To sum things up, we have to acknowledge these misconceptions about cybersecurity. If you read reports from almost 20 years ago, you will see the same problems and issues. Now is a great time to turn things around and bust these myths forever.

The adoption of cloud architectures gives us an opportunity to change the way we think and approach cybersecurity challenges. We can take these myths and put them behind us. As another great thinker, Albert Einstein, said, "The measure of intelligence is the ability to change."