Netlist Inc (QB) (NLST) Quote

Yes I did understand the importance of the BOC case as it is what puts Google six feet under in my opinion as they believe they have a contract through Samsung which in turn means they have no contract.
The 293 case is not arguing the contract tho and only arguing the fact that they infringed on netlist patents and what the damages incurred are(price wise). And the patents that are in question are the 912 and 417 that micron just lost trial on for 445 mil. I'm just confirming that this info is correct and I still know what's going on.

just saw this post, hes thinking along the same lines as me...........

TOMKILA........... Patent 912, Samsung case, the trial is approaching and here is my hypothesis.
Samsung case
First of all, let's analyze the data from the Micron case which affects two of the three patents that will be cited at the end of October.

“ involved two Netlist patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,619,912 and 11,093,417. The infringing products were all Micron DDR4 RDIMMs and DDR4 LRDIMMs”

“The amount of damages awarded by the jury covers infringement by Micron from April 2021 to May 2024 for the ‘912 patent and from August 2021 to May 2024 for the ‘417 patent”

• the 417 LRDIMM patent worth 20m $ •The 912 LRDIMM and rdimm patents worth $425m

about $140 million in damages p. 912 per year per micron (150 if we also consider p.417)

math helps us for two reasons, samsung is the first company in the business with a value double of micron and then there is also another lrdimm patent cited that however little, it could be worth between 30 and 50 million $.

912 damages start from April 2021 and damages will be cited up to November 2024 so a timing of 42 months against the 35 months of the micron case, more or less the same thing also with the other 2 patents.

samsung could be liable for $220/250 million in damages 912 per year (12 months) * 3.5x = potential $770 m - $875m damages 912 + $80/90 m damages lrdimm patents.

So the damages could be around a range of $8/900 million. We take away 20% and we find around a range of damages between $700 and $750 million. This data will surprise many shareholders but it is exactly what we could read in 6 weeks.

yes strap is back!!! the boc case has to do with everything because its finality as in final judgement from scarsi makes it totally in stone that scam sung is in breach of contract. then they cant argue they still have an ongoing contract that they dont even provide product or pay for selling it. not too mention google in february whose case was stayed pending the boc case.

micron was the 294 case we won for a 445million$$$ jury award

scamsong was the 303million$$$$ jury award for the 463 case

the 293 case against scumsang is in november, my opinion is its bigger than the other 2...

then theres that little 203 case against micron for 6 patents that will crush them. its awaiting a trial date which when totalled with the 294 will well exceed a billion dollars, and i'm being conservative......

and a few more google cases and another scum trial to be talked up as soon as we get these under our belt.

Glad to hear it's back in gilstraps hands as he knows all the shenanigans to put it lightly. So this 293 case has nothing to do with the BOC case? And is just determining infringement on a couple patents netlist has and potential damages right? My understanding same patents micron just lost there last case on and were awarded 303 million on! Cant wait to watch them squirm in november

lol!!! at least we can say this is the most verbally concrete trial date we've ever seen!!!

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216364/gov.uscourts.txed.216364.791.0.pdf

This case has been set and reset several times due
to various impediments. The Court does not intend to alter this setting or to again continue
this trial.

lets face it. the only thing that will move this is us getting paid, or the shorting stops. take your pick!!! look how minutely it started walking yesterday on the straps back document. then the little buying we had got taken right out when it slowed up. just keep the dog ready to run!!! anything can happen and will. just dont know when!!!

I wished something would happen to shake the share price alittle this is getting really old.

maybe it will be on halloween!!!

hope hong displays a positive demeanor in the cc...

has to be another month away I believe last was 7-30

Third quarter doesn't end till later this month and then NLST usually takes about 30 days to report. The 3rd quarter should come out in the last few days of October.

any one know when the next one of these is comin, should be close............. https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/2120/us-press-release.html?airportNewsID=9d2c3a92-d6a2-471a-beea-4e81a6d24003

the piss was about 1:38am and couldnt fall back asleep. had dinner made and the produce store done by 9am amongst many other things. even got to spend about 2 hours bastardizing the em7s9 with plenty of fills, forgot to do the laundry though. just had dinner. the golden honey dew i grabbed this morning was best one i ever had in my life........i'm done for the day now... laundry after i get my cup of coffee tomorrow morning though........so hows are favorite pos doing today??? cant wait till scarsi stamps final judgement on that 993...........hoping to get some kind of pay check by christmas. i'll be happy enough if i can pay the prop taxs for the year and get a new central ac unit for next spring. gotta do something with these shares i bought for that trial thats now in november. i think the trading symbols for our beloved ticker should be ROID because it fits. which is cool cuz when it bursts we'll get some relief!!!

NLST, its not just a ticker, its a career............

100lbStriper,, you up at 3:43 to pee or can't sleep working on NLST?

NLST A reminder....Scarsi in his own words—quoted by Netlist in Aug 20 doc—where during a hearing he's discussing a pending stay motion in BOC case:

"And I think that my understanding of what Judge Gilstrap would appreciate — as I would if I was in his position — WOULD BE FOR US IN THIS COURT TO RESOLVE THE CASE AND THEN THIS COURT'S DONE AND THEN JUDGE GILSTRAP CAN DO WHATEVER HE FEELS IS APPROPRIATE IN HIS CASE.
I don't know that — I think that the fact that we do have the potential to squeeze this in before his trial is to the benefit of the court in Texas. I mean often we wouldn't have this flexibility but we appear to do now in our schedule.
So again, having considered all the arguments — and I do think that they're good arguments for a stay but I just think the posture of this with this case being proceeding first, I think we have an obligation, I THINK I HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO RESOLVE THE MATTERS BEFORE THE COURT."

They do talk, new slight trial delay could be to accommodate Scarsi.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_586634429.png

$NLST Here are the Responses filed by Netlist to Micron's JMOL Motion regarding Willfulness / Infringement / Damages and Motion for New Trial. This is the 294 case post trial that Netlist won.

They are all sealed, maybe we get the unsealed/redacted versions from Netlist in a week, though Micron's JMOLs are still sealed from Aug 7th.

But to be honest....it is the same arguments rehashed from their initial JMOL filed during trial right before the jury starts deliberating, which was denied, but motioned in order to preserve these issues for appeal, but only if they RENEW their initial JMOL post trial.

We have read enough of their motions and briefs through the cases to get a feel for what it's about. The thing about Micron that makes litigation a bit less convoluted is that there are no issues or aspects with a previous contract and license, eliminating a whole dynamic of disputes that take up time and space as well as muddying everything else between parties, like Samsung.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_586625607.png

NLST Part-2
So what was really going on....or was it nothing at all curious. Was it meant to put pressure on parties, was it meant to strengthen future appeal efforts, was it just scheduling issues, maybe Gilstrap needed help for a bit....or was it judge level Chess?!?!

I don’t purport to know, but let’s look at the interesting sequence of events (these are not all the events/briefs/motions during that period):

Aug 19—parties request Teleconference
Aug 19—Samsung Notice regarding Renewed Stay Motion
Aug 23—Telephonic Conference held
Aug 23—Gilstrap orders mediation
Aug 26—Gilstrap reassigns case to Schroeder
Aug 28—Schroeder reset trial but still in Marshall (Gilstrap court) instead of Texarkana
Sept 9—Schroeder denied Samsung's Renewed Stay Motion (signed 9th/sealed & released 16th)
Sept 12—parties mediate with Folsom
Sept 19—Schroeder reassigns the case back to Gilstrap

All of the above can be found/viewed on the docket….some of it—what can fit—is in screenshot below.
From bottom to top: https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_586622370.png

Stokd $NLST Part-1
What if anything Gilstrap was trying to get ahead of is a mystery, perhaps cutting off any possibility of appeal claims by Samsung similar to what we’ve seen and know they're capable of...I'm sure you can imagine.

Since Gilstrap already denied many Samsung stay motions and 4 in this case, and given he's very familiar with their tactics, the opportunity presented itself to allow another judge—fresh set of eyes & mind—to consider and rule on Samsung’s Stay — which was again a denial that also affirmed Gilstrap's previous denials.

Gilstrap is up against Samsung as well in a away. An appeal is on the judge and their possible error in conclusions or law as well as abusing discretion, in relation to a judgment or procedural. Gilstrap has to make sure his judgment can withstand appeal, so he’s going to do things whose purpose we may not understand at the time.

Why all the trial date changes etc…judges following procedures governing their actions. But it's all very intriguing!

is everybody ready, hong for president!!!!

Schooled... with a 'strap right across his back!

thank God it was that easy!!!

Yes, I saw that. Only makes sense, since the case was swapped back over to Gilstrap.

Sep 19, 2024 Motion Hearing set for 9/23/2024 at 10:00 AM in (Texarkana) before District Judge Robert W. Schroeder III has been CANCELLED. (aeb)

Netlist, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co, LTD (2:22-cv-00293)
District Court, E.D. Texas

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861664/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

hopefully it just got filed out of order and is referring to the old dates being rescheduled. if not, we'll find out soon enough........

“Terminate deadlines and Hearings”?

New file drop in the 293 case!

Noting to download at this time.

robcobb $NLST Well we got Judge Gilstrap back on the case for the 293 trial,that is a good thing!We know what we have with him. I really thought Judge Schroeder would have been alright,but Judge Gilstrap knows every little thing that Samsung has done (mostly bad) for the last two years + in all the hearings and the 463 trial ,not to say that he judged the same patents in the Micron 294 hearings and trial that will be judged in the 293 case!Once again I am disappointed with the delay but happy Judge Gilstrap is back on this case! After reading Judge Gilstraps order today I think there will be no more delays with the tone he used in his order! I will be ready Oct 8 to witness the pre-trial and rulings on the motions and attend the trial in november.now/ we need a little Scarsi love and make the final ruling on the BOC,hopefully no more delays!GLLs

Stokd $NLST Netlist's Response is due today on Micron's post trial JMOL & New Trial motions in the 294 case won by Netlist. Following is Micron's Reply which is due by Oct 3rd with Netlist's Sur-Reply due by Oct 17th. After that we await Gilstrap's ruling, which presuming is a denial, will start the 30 day clock for Micron to appeal to CAFC. Remember that Final Judgment was already issued by Gilstrap affirming the jury verdict.

Things are progressing nicely whether that's realized and appreciated or not. The way all the many aspects reconcile and when carries heavy implications and can have a big impact. So don't decry the state of things currently and understand there is plenty of we don't know what we don't know as well as behind the scenes activity we're not privy to.

There is a reason for everything whether we understand it or not, so trust the legal team and let it play out!
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_586575730.png

yes indeed!!! and yw, now alls we need is scarsi to stamp final judgement on that boc for starters lol!!! cafc comes later......

Hey Striper,
Things are about to get very interesting.
Thanks for all you do...

NLST Long.

''specially set'' What is a special set hearing in Texas?
A special set hearing means that your hearing is the only hearing set before the court on that date and time. Hearings are sometimes set on a general docket, where a number of cases are set on the same date and time, meaning that the court may not have time to hear all the cases set and some will have to be continued.

lol!!! an unedited one too!!!

thx you you're like a book.. much apperciated

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216364/gov.uscourts.txed.216364.791.0.pdf

This case has been set and reset several times due
to various impediments. The Court does not intend to alter this setting or to again continue
this trial.

And when is 293 case again? don't say within 18 months either....

The tone sounds like someone means business!

what i gather from the context of that document is gilstrap has had enough and this trial will not be delayed!!!
This case has been set and reset several times due
to various impediments. The Court does not intend to alter this setting or to again continue
this trial.

Case 2:22-cv-00293-JRG Document 791 Filed 09/19/24

Pretrial Scheduled for Oct 8th on the 293 case!

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216364/gov.uscourts.txed.216364.791.0.pdf

Are we seeing the early vibrations of a covering? Or just a head fake? Nice to see a pulse though.

get the dogs ready !!! strap just made my day!!!

strap and pain ya gotta luv it!!!

Stokd
48m
$NLST Well....😂 Samsung 293 case back to Gilstrap!🔥🔥🔥
Bullish

get the STRAP we are about to inflict some Payne

i must say, i'm looking forward to it even more now!!!

Indeed, and IMO he will have it!

lol!!! strap wants blood!!!

I would bet that Gilstrap is an adept chess player! Lol

anyone watch ? just got back from the dentist.

i hope that means scamsong is really getting screwed!!!

Wow! 293 reassigned BACK to Gilstrap!

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216364/gov.uscourts.txed.216364.790.0.pdf

$NLST You can watch the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing today at 10 am ET through this link below. FYI, there is more on the agenda than the two IP bills.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/committee-activity/hearings/09/19/2024/executive-business-meeting-1

AGENDA
Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room G50
Thursday, September 19, 2024, at 10:00 a.m.
— S. 2220, PREVAIL Act
— S. 2140, Patent Eligibility Restoration Act