shoondale
2 days ago
The PMA has been ongoing since 2017 with the same 40 deficiencies. Could it possibly be more deficient? If it was serious; it would have passed years ago. Don't be such a fool. The last stock, QTMM, that you claimed was $5+, is long delisted and bankrupted. Again, don't be such a perpetual fool for these blatant stock scams.
"we doubt that shareholders will hear about it. We expect it will be just like when UEEC applied for PMA approval for Class III in late 2017, there will just not be any updates, like it never happened."
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4300303-united-health-products-press-releases-cannot-be-taken-face-value
Waverunners
2 weeks ago
Good morning Dark2 (and all posters.)
Within my reply to your post I asked a question. Really though, It could be answered by anyone on here.
As I’ve stated many times, I am a committed believer in Hemostyp’s potential, but I have no faith in this management team and their manufacturing process.
That said, I’m truly trying to figure out why people choose to support false and misleading pumps and timelines created by posters who clearly can’t offer perspective due to either being over invested and facing huge losses, or just a straight up lack of ability to read PRs and FDA guidelines.
Do you feel that clearly thought out posts based on fact can negatively affect the future of Hemostyp? Personally I don’t think any of us have that kind of influence.
So here’s my question again:
“ I’m curious though. Name one of my posts about Hemostyp and its past, current, or future prospects that you don’t agree with.
Did my post end up being truthful and evidence based after all?
I have always maintained that with the right guidance Hemostyp will get approval.
In contrast, what Trust, DR5, Rodman posts ended up playing out the way they had aggressively hoped for?
Thanks for your time.”
I hope no one complains that I posted the day before the long weekend this time.
Hoonigan
3 weeks ago
Wow you guys are like kids fighting - The late great hoonigan Ken Block once said Be creative and lead a fun life, also don't be an a##hole. Believe me there are way to many of them out there. I trade stocks full time to make money and try to have fun with it too. I love it as much as racing and building stuff. You research, strategize, research, engineer, test, trade and make money. Did any of you guys buy Nuscale Power 6 months ago, it went up 240% in 6 months and I sold it all. It was an AI trade and was more than NVIDA made in 6 months!! and I will buy it again. I have followed these guys from their research at OSU for years before investing. I bought Athrira Pharma at $16 a share it is now $2.41 on meaningless X CEO PHD thesis issues. I bet you want to know how much more I bought, a lot! I have followed these guys from their research at WSU for years. I believe they have a drug to reverse Alzheimer's and Parkinson but are a small company. The only reason I started posting was that I got tired of the all the negative meaningless posts and BS. Have some fun and don't sweat the small stuff since life is to short and do your research, more research and share it --
Have you seen this - The S&P 500 will soar 175% to 15,000 by the end of the decade, Fundstrat's Tom Lee says. He is one of the best at this and is not always right but he has a great use case.
Swing Arm City Utah, Block tears this up in his Ford Fiesta RX43 -- if you are not scared your not driving fast enough KB.
Waverunners
3 weeks ago
I’m here to have debates and offer fact based opinions. I can successfully go back and forth with anyone, as I have absolute confidence in my research.
However, I can see that he is struggling mightily and likely needs a break from discussion boards, as he feels any conflicting views must be addressed with name calling and blatant disregard for facts.
I will leave him be now, I wish him good health. That’s all I can offer.
However, I’m always here for a good intelligent debate.
Speaking of which, did you audit my numbers yet? You called me a liar. Remember?
Waverunners
3 weeks ago
I can see the posts you like on here. If you support posts calling my “holiday post” a “scam story” etc. then I know what you’re all about. If you like that post then you encourage the poster to continue with his zero evidence “attacks.”
I can only assume you also couldn’t handle my fact based opinions, and that you don’t think I own any shares. As those were the points put forth in his post.
As a moderator I figured you could help them with the morning challenge. Then you’re rid of me once and for all.
I’m curious though. Name one of my posts about Hemostyp and its past, current, or future prospects that you don’t agree with.
Did my post end up being truthful and evidence based after all?
I have always maintained that with the right guidance Hemostyp will get approval.
In contrast, what Trust, DR5, Rodman posts ended up playing out the way they had aggressively hoped for?
Thanks for your time.