Health Discovery Corporation (CE) (HDVY) News

Not in the least. I'm bearish on a guy who has lived through a beating on a stock "purportedly", and yet goes onto another stock in almost an identical situation (down to the same courtroom), and makes the same claims he did here for years.
It's as if he has learned nothing.....or else has an agenda.
On the other hand, he could come on the other board and share his experience honestly with others. He went so far as to argue for years with a poster here, offer to admit he was wrong publicly about all he assured you of here, AND now he's arguing with THE SAME GUY and making the same claims on a different stock.
I don't know about you, but I always tend to wonder why certain posters here on IHUB seemingly choose not to learn.

So your Bearish on a stock that's at $0?

If you read the filing even more closely you will find Dr. Hauser is getting paid quite well on a stock trading at zero.
and EVEN MORE CLOSELY and you'll see the auditing accounting firm has quit on the company for some odd reason.

Ou71764...that sure sounds great to me. No doubt that what would be interesting but also to know if he had ever talked with George McGovern prior. This might shed just how related if at all about the prospects of future? Did McGovern point Colleen to him? At any rate I see no reason why he couldn't reply but as you know would be limited. I do feel that Alan will address the shareholders in the coming month or two on his insight or direction to say the least.

Thankyou 🙂

I sent Alan Hauser an email a few minutes ago, asking him for any information he could provide about the future of Health Discovery. I told him that I post on this message board as ou71764 and that other long time shareholders also post here. I'll post any response I get.

Chazz would be the only one with patience to reach out.

Not sure if this link will fire up within the message or not? It references some interesting details about our new CEO, and his vision and past moves within technologies and business plus exhibits a great degree of important insight, processing and general knowledge into the realm of evolving and various business products and their development. Some corporate history along the way plus his proven talents to state the least however will he be able to promote our technologies and or HDC.

https://player.vimeo.com/video/193410461?wmode=opaque&title=0&byline=0&portrait=0

Buylow... nice find involving our new CEO.

https://www.alankhauser.com/

Good Sport...I wish I was smart enough but I'm far from it. Now I'm not relating to you last post but what I can't comprehend is why did Colleen make a move to try and progress foreword when we only have 1 or 2 clear patents left and our SVM-RFE is short lives unless that is being continued further I mean we gotta pay our new CEO and yes he has valued experience in several areas but we have seen this before. Is Colleen just looking to sell some shares and try and make some cash or what?

I haven't dug deep enough lately to try a spot anything worth posting but after a year or so we get a CEO and he must be paid?

Who knows maybe we married Vennwest as their website is now working. https://www.vennwest.com/ or Intel gave us more than the bad news some of us thought.

Another thought is.... Collleen was dearly loved by her Dad. Did she gain money "if" her dads house(s) properties were sold?

Anyone care to guess the probability number that Intel (being a multi billion dollar corporation full of resources etc.) beat us (HDC) to the punch in submitting a "tweak" patent application of the svm-rfe and are awaiting approval from USPTO?

Wow this could be a huge bumber and shocker. Hope I'm 100% off on this thought.

I'm not aware of a public database to search for patent applications that are being processed or in the queue without an application number to search on.

That would have forced our "fold" last year for $2.25 mill...

Good Sport of course everyone has an opinion and general speaking it is about what is posted not the person who delivers the message yet at times it is and if a person can't take it they need not post in these threads. Feelings are feelings and nothing more meaning everyone has the right to post what they would like.

Yes I recall all or pretty much most of our history but as you know....well it isn't too great. I see the attached message mentioned "Hong Zhang" and believe a few of us talked recently about SVM Capital correct? Well "Hong Zhang" is-"was" basically the filing agent or contact for SVM Capital.

I hope to see something amazing happen within the next 365 days but have been waiting like you and several others many years.

I have no idea what's gonna happen Loc but please do not take this post personal. We love all what you do here and all the time you took to research HDC over the years etc.

Here goes:
Bull Shit !
The caliber of a law firm that took on our PI legal suit against Intel would NO WAY have risked it without first seeing PROOF !

End of My rant !

Here are some notes I copied from messages and past posts a while back.

"William F. Quirk, Jr. July 26, 2020 At 12:36 pm
Attn; Boe Rimes. I am a large shareholder in HDC and a former director. On Friday, 24 July, 2020 I emailed this to HDC shareholders, including management and the board, for whom I have email addresses. One shareholder suggested that I forward it to you as well. Sincerely, William F. Quirk, Jr.

All,

Attached is HDC’s just-filed lawsuit against Intel. In my view this Complaint is outstanding, well beyond simply superb. CEO George McGovern deserves tremendous credit for shepherding this to fruition. It is waterproof and bulletproof; a huge battering ram that Intel will find very difficult to defend against. HDC has pursued this for ten years. Ten long years! Reinterpreting “The Hound of Heaven”, Intel (“I”), fully intending to exhaust the cash and staying power of HDC (“Him”) …

I fled Him, down the nights and down the days; I fled Him, down the arches of the years; I fled Him, down the labyrinthine ways.

It didn’t work in Francis Thompson’s poem (Him caught I) and it didn’t work here. We always suspected that Intel’s long-standing use of our proprietary technology was being used in a multitude of their products and processes and this lawsuit now documents this conclusively. It’s not over yet but in my view, Intel has to pay up, big time. I don’t believe Intel can chance a jury trial because of the triple damages potential (see below). This is the beginning of the end.

Some observations.

• “Rocket Docket.” This court (The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas – Waco Division) and its sibling, the “Eastern District”, are known in patent litigation circles as Rocket Dockets because they deal with patent cases very expeditiously. The judges are patent-knowledgeable and appear disinclined to be overwhelmed by the dilatory tactics of huge corporations. The best cases could take a year or more. Everything being equal, better to file here than, well, anywhere else.

• Enhanced Damages. The Complaint documents conclusively that Intel willfully used our technology even though they knew it was protected by our patents. Willful is a long iron spear with a very sharp tip, as it exposes purposeful infringers to what is known as “enhanced damages”, i.e. as much as triple damages. See the attachment below that I emailed last year describing the Supreme Court decision that made it much easier for plaintiffs to prove willfulness. It’s actually worth reading to understand that this is not some pie-in- the-sky fantasy. And I don’t think that Intel can dismiss this factor as trivial. Also see “675 million” pdf below, and this is without enhanced damages but possibly with the threat of them. This is a really big “biggie” …

• Cascading Infringement. Intel’s infringing products and processes are used “downstream”, as it’s known, by customers and partners. Knowingly, or not, these too are infringers and exposed to HDC’s claims. Intel must hold these parties harmless and thus the potential recovery for HDC is larger by a serious but unquantifiable amount. Any resolution of this matter must necessarily take this into account. This is not a trivial factor.

• China. Whether to disguise its origins or not, HDC’s SVM-RFE patent was literally copied and pasted by Intel’s Chinese mathematicians (I saw this myself some years ago), clumsily disguised with a fake “feedback loop” so as to be able to claim originality, and then submitted to the U.S. Patent Office. Upcoming WSJ investigatory headline? “Intel uses China office to launder stolen technology from small U.S. company”??? Intel can’t possibly permit that, can they? In my view, this is also a biggie for two reasons: first, purposeful theft and concealment and second, perpetrated in China which is now politically toxic. Bad, really bad, and too bad for Intel in a jury trial in Waco.

• Permanent injunction requested. The Court will never permit this to happen but if it did, the damage to Intel would be staggering. Theoretically this is the biggest biggie.

The attorneys who crafted this Complaint did an tremendous job. Eleanor Musick, HDC’s longtime “uber-knowledgeable” patent counsel, and Hong Zhang, HDC’s long-time genius mathematician had to have contributed extraordinary substance to the Complaint; as far as I’m concerned, they are rock stars. And without question, George McGovern and Marty Delmonte pulled together all the pieces in a very professional and effective way.

This is the beginning of the end"

I'm not sure but sense there is other problems that might need tidying up at the the Georgia Corporations office which actually could have been completed but yes 2 or 3 prong movements would seem to be at hand.

Wow is right thinking that our CEO might be working with Intel on our behave but from all that we have seen I feel the settlement was completed long ago. I say this as people also need to look at the mass business Intel does and our little patent in their eyes is just that however their huge legal teams across the world would defend a a tooth pick to the death if they so felt the need. I gather Intel probably didn't think the lawsuit would persists as long as it did so they waited (and I could be wrong) until the discovery phase of the trial to see what if anything that HDC had. I just feel we fall short but we have been waiting for Christmas over 20 plus years.

It would please me to see this kiss .50 share price but that won't happen. It seems that HDC will never rise above the ashes to be blown away yet in a constant hell hole holding all of us at ransom.

Wow, Good Sport that came as a bolt of lightning out of the blue! You introduce a point that I have not considered, and I must admit that you could be onto something with that theory. Still, there was no mention of, or reference to, Intel still being in the picture in HDC's recent 8-k filing, or in the accompanying PR, so if you are correct, that would surprise everybody, including me.

Good sport who knows, if so all the geniuses selling at zero will be outraged.

Dr. Houser PHD may be working for Intel Corporation in another month or so. We really don't know all the final specifics of the 2023 "agreement" between HDC & Intel.
All possibilities are still on the table imo. Could we still be acquired?

U would think that this audit and updated financials will be done soon, what’s to audit they haven’t made a cent ever. I believe.

I don't hold those numbers in HDC and never did I do hold roughly 150k shares

I understand now why you are hoping it trades again Loc.

Market makers? Yes. Crooks? I have no information to confirm that that is true.

Good Sport, I had 30 million shares and junked 20 million held 10 million for 7 years then finally sold the last 10 million for .0001 per shares profit. $1k wasn't worth all that time. Yes it can suck a big one but the money is out there to be claimed.

There are good reasons to maintain the expert market.

I never got into shorting stocks and probably never will but know that shorting stocks keep pressure on the checks and balances of the entire market, the market needs both ends of that spectrum.

Unfortunately chazzy the only ones that could buy are the crook marketmakers

Yes that would be a shame. In fact, I had to sell my holdings of HDVY stock held in an I R A account for just a pennies on the dollar, because of something called minimum distribution. This happened right before the lawsuit against intel was announced. Fortunately, the shares that I currently hold are not in an I R A account.

To look at it another way buylow2, someone just picked up a hundred thousand shares real cheap.

Sad, probably somebody's margin account was liquidated from a bunch of stocks that had gone down in price and a cash requirement level was triggered. I got all my stocks out of that pathway so as not to have to worry about that. Can you imagine waiting more than a dozen years on a taco 🌮 penny stock like this and then your 108k shares get washed down the toilet for a few bucks just before a possible huge upside? Painful!

What a shame, someone sold 100,000 shares at basically zero and this criminal expert exchange. Insane.

Today is the first time I've seen volume in this ticker in a long while. Looks like 108K changed hands today. I've been holding HDVY for what seems like an eternity. I hope the breath of life is still in her for she's been on her death bed far too long.

Intel... back to their old bag of tricks

"Intel sued for copyright infringement over AI software"

By Blake Brittain

August 9, 2024
12:15 PM EDT

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/intel-sued-copyright-infringement-over-ai-software-2024-08-09/

Good Sport...you are going to have people working for "Pitchbook Data" from their own entities or homes. Georgia does not represent any established address nor corporate headquarters nor satellite offices, that is from my last search involving this company. They are global and have headquarters in Washington State. They are incorporated in the state of Delaware.

Pitchbook is centered out of the State of Georgia as well. Sounds like this is gonna have to be looked into for closure. Yet another possible HDVY shareholder bamboozle job.
HDC IP use for almost two decades if my guess is correct. We should have received something from the deal one would guess. 🤪 Very Sad !

Good info, LocWolf!

Well...let me put it another way SVM Capital - control # 07021131 was terminated on May 4, 2020

You might need to go to a different state and find SVM Capital where as Mark Moore may have used the same name of SVM Capital? I'm just not sure.

As for SVM Capital and HDC it would appear that Mark Moore could not sell SVM Capital if there was any liability involving HDC equity rights so who knows if HDC was notified prior this sale. It seems to me that both Moore and McGovern were upset involving their business relationship. I tend to believe that both parties did not follow up on the growing business deals over the years plus it wasn’t as if HDC had any right to hound Moore about progress yet if I recall there was to be updates yet we never heard jack chit about anything. At this point I believe fault on both parties and no real reason to file lawsuit to dig up a bad past.

Yes, and that is a very good question, Good Sport. I believe that in due course as the company evolves into a greater transparency, shareholders will have a portal to get those kinds of questions answered.

I'm very interested in knowing if we received any funds from the "Pitchbook" acquisition of SVM Capital last year (2023). SVM Capital was a subsidiary or a joint venture of HDC. The new private company that now owns it is called Pitchbook. Let us keep this on the list of things to follow up on...

I tend to lean toward our CEO to bring several documents including new up date within the Georgia Corporations offices before we will hear much.

Yes, I agree with you one hundred percent.
A current email address and phone number are not that expensive, and go a long way to inspire confidence in the investor, and to establish legitimacy and credibility for a company. Hopefully, that is in the works, or on the agenda of things to get done. Hiring a staff costs money, but we will need an investor relations person at some point. Perhaps when the stock is trading again, we will have these items, as they will then be needed. Thanks for your comments mankind.

I think Dr. Hauser needs to re-instate an email address and a website or splash page to instill confidence that this going somewhere. Iv'e tried both and email just kicks back as undeliverable. As far as calling, I just tried and it rings once or twice and disconnects. Little milestones would be encouraging.

Let's consider this scenario and, someone with more knowledge, please weigh in. Let's say that after weeks of researching various companies who may be using SVM-RFE technology, Dr. Hauser drafts and sends letters informing these companies that they are using HDC's patented technology without a license. Once notified, these companies may take some time to respond. They may need to engage their legal departments. Once all of the information has been verified and a licensing agreement is presented for signature, these companies may have up to ninety additional days to begin making payments.
These arrangements are not lawsuits. They are licensing agreements. Therefore, those infringing companies, in all likelihood, could not be forced to pay for use which occurred before they were notified. Not sure about that one. One may have to sue to collect retroactive royalties, and I don't believe that Dr. Hauser wants to start suing people, as that is very expensive and time consuming.
My point with this post is that even if things are proceeding on course and on schedule, we may be looking at months, not days or weeks, before we get a PR disclosing a material event.

All we can do now is wait. Staring at the clock (or at the stock price) only makes the time pass more slowly. Worrying about things over which we have no control makes no sense either, as it is an expenditure of negative energy. We are like the farmer who has planted his seed. Now, we hope and pray for rain and sunshine. The rain will come in the form of good news. The sunshine will be in the form of new buyers, causing the share price to grow. That concludes my philosophy lesson for the day. GLTA.

Ditto Zenos, and thanks for adding yet a new perspective. The fact that HDC has the money to pay an accounting firm to bring us current with all required SEC filings was new and good information. Things tend to keep looking better.

Mankind, I like your perspectives, and I hope you continue to share them with us.

Hey Chazzy1, by vultures I mean new investors that stalk for ANY new filings on expert market. We have that already as of last month. As for us holders, I don’t think we’re of the pump and dump crowd. The amount of forensics by active members of this board has been magnificent. Admittedly, I don’t understand half of the legalities but not only does our new CEOs interests fall in line with shareholders, he also has a lockup period that any holder should keep in mind. Hoping that our ceo doesn’t get cute and do a chunky R/S to monetize remaining auth shares.

Thank you for sharing your astute insights, perspectives and ideas, mankind. I agree that our new CEO has a major incentive to grow value for the shareholders, as his compensation package is significantly stock based. Exactly how he accomplishes this goal, or what his "psychological motivations" might be is not for me to say, or speculate, however, he is most capable. By vultures, I assume that you mean many shareholders will be looking for the first opportunity to liquidate their HDVY stock. Perhaps so, but to grow value for shareholders implies that there will be some new element there to attract new buyers. Who knows? We could in fact be a part of something revolutionary that could change the world. JMHO.

It would seem that our SVM-RFE patent is going to be continued and possibly extend into digital arena. If we could break into the 3D arena that would be even better.

>>>Yeah, the only reason to go public is to make your equity liquid and to have Mr market apply a multiple to value of your biz.>>>

Yeppers. And liquidity is buyers and sellers. As it stands, most on this board are willing sellers. But there will be no buyers if Dr. Hauser doesn’t close a deal or two or able to create a pipeline of prospective licensing partnerships.

It seems we have the money from Intel to satisfy the expense of a Super-K, which combines our delinquent 10-Qs and Ks in one report.

I also agree with Chazzy. Dr. Hrauser will probably put out a PR when this process is either reportable or complete.

For All Mankind nailed it. Dr. Hauser cares little about his name in lights and only wants to secure the value of his stock options-which is the other half of his CEO compensation.

Yeah, the only reason to go public is to make your equity liquid and to have Mr market apply a multiple to value of your biz. Whether our new ceo wants to change the world or to see his name in lights, he wants to get paid. His paltry salary won’t do it. A top tier accounting firm to get us current would be big bucks and would still put us at the back of the line and we would freak out when we saw such an expense on the filings. Point is, his priority is to get current. Filings will come and otc markets will automatically pull from finra to their website. Then the vultures will see filings and be waiting to pounce.

Maybe not that easy, or cheap, to do because of all the past due filings that need to be brought current. Still, I would guess that this would be a top priority on Dr. Hauser's agenda, among other things.

Getting financials updated is just a matter of paying for someone to do them. Let’s face it there is no revenue or anything, should be easy breezy.