Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(currency in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
1.
|
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
|
In this Form 10-Q, unless otherwise stated, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and the “company” refer to Campbell Soup Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and entities in which we maintain a controlling financial interest and a variable interest entity (VIE) for which we are the primary beneficiary. Intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts in prior-year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation.
The financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in our opinion, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows for the indicated periods. The accounting policies we used in preparing these financial statements are substantially consistent with those we applied in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
July 31, 2016
, except as described in Note 2.
The results for the period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for other interim periods or the full year. Our fiscal year ends on the Sunday nearest July 31.
|
|
2.
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued revised guidance on the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. The guidance is designed to create greater comparability for financial statement users across industries and jurisdictions. The guidance also requires enhanced disclosures. The guidance was originally effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. In July 2015, the FASB decided to delay the effective date of the new revenue guidance by one year to fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Entities will be permitted to adopt the new revenue standard early, but not before the original effective date. The guidance permits the use of either a full retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. We are currently evaluating the impact that the new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements, as well as which transition method we will use.
In April 2015, the FASB issued guidance to clarify the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. The new guidance should be applied either prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date or retrospectively. In 2017, we prospectively adopted the guidance. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2015, the FASB issued guidance that eliminates the requirement to restate prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments for business combinations. The new guidance requires that the cumulative impact of a measurement period adjustment (including the impact on prior periods) be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those years and should be applied prospectively to measurement period adjustments that occur after the effective date. We will prospectively apply the guidance to applicable transactions.
In January 2016, the FASB issued guidance that amends the recognition and measurement of financial instruments. The changes primarily affect the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. Under the new guidance, equity investments in unconsolidated entities that are not accounted for under the equity method will generally be measured at fair value through earnings. When the fair value option has been elected for financial liabilities, changes in fair value due to instrument-specific credit risk will be recognized separately in other comprehensive income. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years. We are currently evaluating the impact that the new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance that amends accounting for leases. Under the new guidance, a lessee will recognize assets and liabilities for most leases but will recognize expenses similar to current lease accounting. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The new guidance must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition, and provides for certain practical expedients. We are currently evaluating the impact that the new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance that amends accounting for share-based payments, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. We adopted the guidance in 2017. In accordance with the prospective adoption of the recognition of excess tax benefits and deficiencies in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, we recognized a
$6
tax benefit in Taxes on earnings in the three-
month period ended October 30, 2016. We elected to continue to estimate forfeitures expected to occur. In addition, we elected to adopt retrospectively the amendment to present excess tax benefits on share-based compensation as an operating activity, which resulted in a reclassification of
$6
from Net cash used in financing activities to Net cash provided by operating activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three-month period ended November 1, 2015. We also adopted retrospectively the amendment to present cash payments to tax authorities in connection with shares withheld to meet statutory tax withholding requirements as a financing activity. As a result, there was a reclassification of
$20
from Net cash provided by operating activities to Net cash used in financing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three-month period ended November 1, 2015.
In August 2016, the FASB issued guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented but may be applied prospectively if retrospective application would be impracticable. We are currently evaluating the impact that the new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued guidance on tax accounting for intra-entity asset transfers. Under current guidance, the tax effects of intra-entity asset transfers (intercompany sales) are deferred until the transferred asset is sold to a third party or otherwise recognized. The new guidance requires companies to account for the income tax effects on intercompany transfers of assets other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted in the first interim period of a fiscal year. The modified retrospective approach is required upon adoption, with a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded in retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact that the new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
(1)
|
|
Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges
(2)
|
|
Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plan Adjustments
(3)
|
|
Total Accumulated Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Balance at July 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
(124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41
|
)
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
10
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Balance at October 30, 2016
|
|
$
|
(133
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
(107
|
)
|
_____________________________________
|
|
(1)
|
Included a tax expense of
$6
as of
October 30, 2016
, and
July 31, 2016
.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Included a tax benefit of
$18
as of
October 30, 2016
, and
$23
as of
July 31, 2016
.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Included a tax expense of
$33
as of
October 30, 2016
, and
$35
as of
July 31, 2016
.
|
Amounts related to noncontrolling interests were not material.
The amounts reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components
|
|
October 30, 2016
|
|
November 1, 2015
|
|
Location of (Gain) Loss Recognized in Earnings
|
(Gains) losses on cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Other expenses / (income)
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
Total before tax
|
|
2
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
Tax expense (benefit)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss, net of tax
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and postretirement benefit adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service credit
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
(1)
|
Tax expense (benefit)
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
_____________________________________
|
|
(1)
|
This is included in the components of net periodic benefit costs (see Note 8 for additional details).
|
|
|
4.
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill
The following table shows the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
Simple
Meals and Beverages
|
|
Global
Biscuits
and
Snacks
|
|
Campbell Fresh
|
|
Total
|
Gross balance at July 31, 2016
|
$
|
775
|
|
|
$
|
757
|
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
|
$
|
2,369
|
|
Accumulated impairment charges
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
(106
|
)
|
Net balance at July 31, 2016
|
$
|
775
|
|
|
$
|
757
|
|
|
$
|
731
|
|
|
$
|
2,263
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Balance at October 30, 2016
|
$
|
773
|
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
|
$
|
731
|
|
|
$
|
2,259
|
|
Intangible Assets
The following table sets forth balance sheet information for intangible assets, excluding goodwill, subject to amortization and intangible assets not subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
October 30,
2016
|
|
July 31,
2016
|
Amortizable intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
Technology
|
|
40
|
|
|
40
|
|
Other
|
|
35
|
|
|
35
|
|
Total gross amortizable intangible assets
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
(72
|
)
|
Total net amortizable intangible assets
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
Non-amortizable intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
925
|
|
|
927
|
|
Total net intangible assets
|
|
$
|
1,145
|
|
|
$
|
1,152
|
|
Non-amortizable intangible assets consist of trademarks, which include
Bolthouse Farms, Pace
,
Plum, Kjeldsens, Garden Fresh Gourmet
and
Royal Dansk
. Other amortizable intangible assets consist of recipes, patents, trademarks and distributor relationships.
Amortization of intangible assets was
$5
for the three-month periods ended
October 30, 2016
, and
November 1, 2015
. Amortization expense for the next 5 years is estimated to be
$20
in 2017, and
$15
in 2018 through 2021. Asset useful lives range from
5
to
20
years.
|
|
5.
|
Business and Geographic Segment Information
|
We manage our businesses in three segments focused mainly on product categories. The segments are:
|
|
•
|
Americas Simple Meals and Beverages segment includes the retail and food service businesses in the U.S., Canada and Latin America. The segment includes the following products:
Campbell’s
condensed and ready-to-serve soups;
Swanson
broth and stocks;
Prego
pasta sauces;
Pace
Mexican sauces;
Campbell’s
gravies, pasta, beans and dinner sauces;
Swanson
canned poultry;
Plum
food and snacks;
V8
juices and beverages; and
Campbell’s
tomato juice;
|
|
|
•
|
Global Biscuits and Snacks segment includes Pepperidge Farm cookies, crackers, bakery and frozen products in U.S. retail; Arnott’s biscuits in Australia and Asia Pacific; and Kelsen cookies globally. The segment also includes the simple meals and shelf-stable beverages business in Australia and Asia Pacific; and
|
|
|
•
|
Campbell Fresh includes Bolthouse Farms fresh carrots, carrot ingredients, refrigerated beverages and refrigerated salad dressings; Garden Fresh Gourmet salsa, hummus, dips and tortilla chips; and the U.S. refrigerated soup business.
|
We evaluate segment performance before interest, taxes and costs associated with restructuring activities. Unrealized gains and losses on commodity hedging activities are excluded from segment operating earnings and are recorded in Corporate as these open positions represent hedges of future purchases. Upon closing of the contracts, the realized gain or loss is transferred to segment operating earnings, which allows the segments to reflect the economic effects of the hedge without exposure to quarterly volatility of unrealized gains and losses. Only the service cost component of pension and postretirement expense is allocated to segments. All other components of expense, including interest cost, expected return on assets, amortization of prior service credits and recognized actuarial gains and losses are reflected in Corporate and not included in segment operating results. Asset information by segment is not discretely maintained for internal reporting or used in evaluating performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
October 30,
2016
|
|
November 1,
2015
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
Americas Simple Meals and Beverages
|
|
$
|
1,297
|
|
|
$
|
1,302
|
|
Global Biscuits and Snacks
|
|
671
|
|
|
652
|
|
Campbell Fresh
|
|
234
|
|
|
249
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,202
|
|
|
$
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
October 30,
2016
|
|
November 1,
2015
|
Earnings before interest and taxes
|
|
|
|
|
Americas Simple Meals and Beverages
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
Global Biscuits and Snacks
|
|
112
|
|
|
114
|
|
Campbell Fresh
|
|
1
|
|
|
18
|
|
Corporate
(1)
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
(159
|
)
|
Restructuring charges
(2)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
457
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents unallocated items. Pension and postretirement benefit mark-to-market adjustments are included in Corporate. Losses were
$20
and
$128
in the
three-month
periods ended
October 30, 2016
, and
November 1, 2015
, respectively. Costs of
$8
and
$15
related to the implementation of our new organizational structure and cost savings initiatives were included in the
three-month
periods ended
October 30, 2016
, and
November 1, 2015
, respectively.
|
|
|
(2)
|
See Note 6 for additional information.
|
Our global net sales based on product categories are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
October 30,
2016
|
|
November 1,
2015
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
Soup
|
|
$
|
863
|
|
|
$
|
864
|
|
Baked snacks
|
|
653
|
|
|
634
|
|
Other simple meals
|
|
429
|
|
|
429
|
|
Beverages
|
|
257
|
|
|
276
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,202
|
|
|
$
|
2,203
|
|
Soup includes various soup, broths and stock products. Baked Snacks include cookies, crackers, biscuits and other baked products. Other simple meals include sauces, carrot products, refrigerated salad dressings, refrigerated salsa, hummus, dips and Plum foods and snacks.
|
|
6.
|
Restructuring Charges and Cost Savings Initiatives
|
2015 Initiatives
On January 29, 2015, we announced plans to implement a new enterprise design focused mainly on product categories. Under the new structure, which we fully implemented at the beginning of 2016, our businesses are organized in the following divisions: Americas Simple Meals and Beverages, Global Biscuits and Snacks, and Campbell Fresh.
In support of the new structure, we designed and implemented a new Integrated Global Services organization to deliver shared services across the company. We also streamlined our organizational structure. We are pursuing other initiatives to reduce costs and increase effectiveness, such as adopting zero-based budgeting over time.
As part of these initiatives, we commenced a voluntary employee separation program available to certain U.S.-based salaried employees nearing retirement who met age, length-of-service and business unit/function criteria. A total of
471
employees elected the program. The electing employees remained with us through at least July 31, 2015, with some remaining beyond July 31. We also implemented an initiative to reduce overhead across the organization by eliminating approximately
275
positions. In the first quarter of 2017, we recorded a restructuring charge of
$1
related to these initiatives. In 2016, we recorded a restructuring charge of
$35
related to these initiatives. Of the amounts recorded in 2016,
$21
was recorded in the first quarter. In 2015, we recorded a restructuring charge of
$102
related to these initiatives.
In the first quarter of 2017, we also incurred charges of
$8
in Administrative expenses related to the implementation of the new organizational structure and cost savings initiatives. In 2016 and 2015, we incurred charges of
$47
and
$22
, respectively, recorded in Administrative expenses related to these initiatives. Of the amounts recorded in 2016,
$15
was recorded in the first quarter.
In the first quarter of 2017, the aggregate after-tax impact of restructuring charges, implementation costs and other related costs recorded was
$6
, or
$.02
per share. In the first quarter of 2016, the aggregate after-tax impact of restructuring charges, implementation costs and other related costs recorded was
$23
, or
$.07
per share. The aggregate after-tax impact of restructuring charges, implementation costs and other related costs recorded in 2016 and 2015 was
$52
, or
$.17
per share, and
$78
, or
$.25
per share, respectively. A summary of the pre-tax costs associated with the 2015 initiatives is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized
as of
October 30, 2016
|
Severance pay and benefits
|
$
|
129
|
|
Implementation costs and other related costs
|
86
|
|
Total
|
$
|
215
|
|
The total estimated pre-tax costs for the 2015 initiatives are approximately
$250
to
$300
. We expect to incur these costs through 2018.
We expect the costs to consist of approximately
$135
to
$145
in severance pay and benefits, and approximately
$115
to
$155
in implementation costs and other related costs.We expect the total pre-tax costs related to the 2015 initiatives will be associated with segments as follows: Americas Simple Meals and Beverages - approximately
30%
; Global Biscuits and Snacks - approximately
32%
; Campbell Fresh - approximately
3%
; and Corporate - approximately
35%
.
A summary of the restructuring activity and related reserves associated with the 2015 initiatives at
October 30, 2016
, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance Pay and Benefits
|
|
Implementation Costs and Other Related Costs
(3)
|
|
Total Charges
|
Accrued balance at July 31, 2016
(1)
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017 charges
|
|
1
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
2017 cash payments
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued balance at October 30, 2016
(2)
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________________________________
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
$17
of severance pay and benefits recorded in Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
$9
of severance pay and benefits recorded in Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes other costs recognized as incurred that are not reflected in the restructuring reserve in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The costs are included in Administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
|
Segment operating results do not include restructuring charges, implementation costs and other related costs because we evaluate segment performance excluding such charges. A summary of the pre-tax costs associated with segments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 30, 2016
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Costs Incurred to Date
|
Americas Simple Meals and Beverages
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
Global Biscuits and Snacks
|
3
|
|
|
69
|
|
Campbell Fresh
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
Corporate
|
6
|
|
|
73
|
|
Total
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
For the periods presented in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings, the calculations of basic EPS and EPS assuming dilution vary in that the weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution include the incremental effect of stock options and other share-based payment awards, except when such effect would be antidilutive. The earnings per share calculation for the three-month periods ended
October 30, 2016
, and
November 1, 2015
, excludes less than 1 million stock options that would have been antidilutive.
|
|
8.
|
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
|
We sponsor certain defined benefit pension and postretirement plans for employees. Actuarial gains and losses are recognized immediately in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings as of the measurement date, which is our fiscal year end, or more frequently if an interim remeasurement is required. Components of net benefit (income) / expense were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Pension
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
October 30,
2016
|
|
November 1,
2015
|
|
October 30,
2016
|
|
November 1,
2015
|
Service cost
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Interest cost
|
22
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(36
|
)
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of prior service credit
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
—
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net periodic benefit (income) / expense
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
In July 2016, the retirement medical program was amended and beginning on January 1, 2017, we will no longer sponsor our own medical coverage for certain Medicare-eligible retirees. Instead, we will offer these Medicare-eligible retirees access to health care coverage through a private exchange and offer a health reimbursement account to subsidize benefits for a select group of retirees. The prior service credit is primarily related to the amendment in July 2016.
The recognized net actuarial loss in the first quarter of 2016 resulted from the remeasurement of certain U.S. plans. The remeasurement was required due to a high level of lump sum payments to certain vested plan participants arising primarily out of a limited-time offer to accept a single lump sum in lieu of future annuity payments.
No contributions are expected to be made to U.S. pension plans in 2017. Contributions to non-U.S. pension plans during the three-month period ended
October 30, 2016
, were
$1
. We expect contributions to non-U.S. pension plans during the remainder of the year to be approximately
$3
.
The principal market risks to which we are exposed are changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices. In addition, we are exposed to equity price changes related to certain deferred compensation obligations. In order to manage these exposures, we follow established risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative contracts such as swaps, options, forwards and commodity futures. We enter into these derivative contracts for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures, and the contracts do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. We do not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and do not use leveraged instruments. Our derivative programs include instruments that qualify and others that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment.
Concentration of Credit Risk
We are exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts will fail to meet their contractual obligations. To mitigate counterparty credit risk, we enter into contracts only with carefully selected, leading, credit-worthy financial institutions, and distribute contracts among several financial institutions to reduce the concentration of credit risk. We do not have credit-risk-related contingent features in our derivative instruments as of
October 30, 2016
, or
July 31, 2016
.
We are also exposed to credit risk from our customers. During 2016, our largest customer accounted for approximately
20%
of consolidated net sales. Our five largest customers accounted for approximately
40%
of our consolidated net sales in 2016.
We closely monitor credit risk associated with counterparties and customers.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange risk related to our international operations, including non-functional currency intercompany debt and net investments in subsidiaries. We are also exposed to foreign exchange risk as a result of transactions in currencies other than the functional currency of certain subsidiaries. Principal currencies hedged include the Canadian dollar, Australian dollar and U.S. dollar. We utilize foreign exchange forward purchase and sale contracts, as well as cross-currency swaps, to hedge these exposures. The contracts are either designated as cash-flow hedging instruments or are undesignated. We hedge portions of our forecasted foreign currency transaction exposure with foreign exchange forward contracts for periods typically up to
18
months. To hedge currency exposures related to intercompany debt, we enter into foreign exchange forward purchase and sale contracts, as well as cross-currency swap contracts, for periods consistent with the underlying debt. The notional amount of foreign exchange forward contracts accounted for as cash-flow hedges was
$74
at
October 30, 2016
, and
$91
at
July 31, 2016
. The effective portion of the changes in fair value on these instruments is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) and is reclassified into the Consolidated Statements of Earnings on the same line item and the same period in which the underlying hedged transaction affects earnings. The notional amount of foreign exchange forward contracts that are not designated as accounting hedges was
$121
and
$175
at
October 30, 2016
, and
July 31, 2016
, respectively. There were
no
cross-currency swap contracts outstanding as of
October 30, 2016
, or
July 31, 2016
.
Interest Rate Risk
We manage our exposure to changes in interest rates by optimizing the use of variable-rate and fixed-rate debt and by utilizing interest rate swaps in order to maintain our variable-to-total debt ratio within targeted guidelines. Receive fixed rate/pay variable rate interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair-value hedges. We manage our exposure to interest rate volatility on future debt issuances by entering into forward starting interest rate swaps to lock in the rate on the interest payments related to the anticipated debt issuances. These pay fixed rate/receive variable rate forward starting interest rate swaps are accounted for as cash-flow hedges. The effective portion of the changes in fair value on these instruments is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) and is reclassified into the Consolidated Statements of Earnings over the life of the debt. The notional amount of outstanding forward starting interest rate swaps totaled
$300
at
October 30, 2016
and at
July 31, 2016
, which relates to an anticipated debt issuance in 2018.
Commodity Price Risk
We principally use a combination of purchase orders and various short- and long-term supply arrangements in connection with the purchase of raw materials, including certain commodities and agricultural products. We also enter into commodity futures, options and swap contracts to reduce the volatility of price fluctuations of wheat, diesel fuel, cocoa, aluminum, natural gas, soybean oil, butter, corn and cheese, which impact the cost of raw materials. Commodity futures, options, and swap contracts are either designated as cash-flow hedging instruments or are undesignated. We hedge a portion of commodity requirements for periods typically up to
18
months. There were
no
commodity contracts accounted for as cash-flow hedges as of
October 30, 2016
, or
July 31, 2016
. The notional amount of commodity contracts not designated as accounting hedges was
$71
at
October 30, 2016
, and
$88
at
July 31, 2016
.
Equity Price Risk
We enter into swap contracts which hedge a portion of exposures relating to certain deferred compensation obligations linked to the total return of our capital stock, the total return of the Vanguard Institutional Index, and the total return of the Vanguard Total International Stock Index. Under these contracts, we pay variable interest rates and receive from the counterparty either: the total return on our capital stock; the total return of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index, which is expected to approximate the total return of the Vanguard Institutional Index; or the total return of the iShares MSCI EAFE Index, which is expected to approximate the total return of the Vanguard Total International Stock Index. These contracts were not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. We enter into these contracts for periods typically not exceeding
12
months. The notional amounts of the contracts as of
October 30, 2016
, and
July 31, 2016
, were
$42
and
$44
, respectively.
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments on a gross basis as recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
October 30, 2016
, and
July 31, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
|
October 30,
2016
|
|
July 31,
2016
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedges
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Deferred compensation derivative contracts
|
Other current assets
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
Other current assets
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedges
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Total asset derivatives
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
|
October 30,
2016
|
|
July 31,
2016
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
34
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps
|
Other liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
44
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedges
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Deferred compensation derivative contracts
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
2
|
|
|
7
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedges
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
Total liability derivatives
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
We do not offset the fair values of derivative assets and liabilities executed with the same counterparty that are generally subject to enforceable netting agreements. However, if we were to offset and record the asset and liability balances of derivatives on a net basis, the amounts presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
October 30, 2016
, and
July 31, 2016
, would be adjusted as detailed in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 30, 2016
|
|
July 31, 2016
|
Derivative Instrument
|
|
Gross Amounts Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Subject to Netting Agreements
|
|
Net Amount
|
|
Gross Amounts Presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Subject to Netting Agreements
|
|
Net Amount
|
Total asset derivatives
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Total liability derivatives
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
We do not offset fair value amounts recognized for exchange-traded commodity derivative instruments and cash margin accounts executed with the same counterparty that are subject to enforceable netting agreements. We are required to maintain cash margin accounts in connection with funding the settlement of open positions. At
October 30, 2016
, and
July 31, 2016
, a cash margin account balance of
$2
and
$5
, respectively, was included in Other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following tables show the effect of our derivative instruments designated as cash-flow hedges for the
three-month
periods ended
October 30, 2016
, and
November 1, 2015
, in other comprehensive income (loss) (OCI) and the Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Cash-Flow Hedge
OCI Activity
|
Derivatives Designated as Cash-Flow Hedges
|
|
|
October 30, 2016
|
|
November 1, 2015
|
OCI derivative gain (loss) at beginning of year
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
Effective portion of changes in fair value recognized in OCI:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Amount of (gain) loss reclassified from OCI to earnings:
|
Location in Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
1
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
Other expenses / (income)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps
|
Interest expense
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
OCI derivative gain (loss) at end of quarter
|
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
Based on current valuations, the amount expected to be reclassified from OCI into earnings within the next
12
months is a
loss
of
$9
.
The ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing were not material.
The following table shows the effects of our derivative instruments not designated as hedges in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of (Gain) Loss Recognized in Earnings on Derivatives
|
Derivatives not Designated as Hedges
|
|
Location of (Gain) Loss
Recognized in Earnings
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
October 30, 2016
|
|
November 1, 2015
|
Commodity derivative contracts
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Deferred compensation derivative contracts
|
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Variable Interest Entity
|
In February 2016, we agreed to make a
$125
capital commitment to Acre Venture Partners, L.P. (Acre), a limited partnership formed to make venture capital investments in innovative new companies in food and food-related industries. Acre is managed by its general partner, Acre Ventures GP, LLC, which is independent of us. We are the sole limited partner of Acre and own a
99.8%
interest. Our share of earnings (loss) is calculated according to the terms of the partnership agreement. Acre is a VIE. We have determined that we are the primary beneficiary. Therefore, we consolidate Acre and account for the third party ownership as a noncontrolling interest. Through
October 30, 2016
, we funded
$41
of the capital commitment. Except for the remaining unfunded capital commitment of
$84
, we do not have obligations to provide additional financial or other support to Acre.
Acre elected the fair value option to account for qualifying investments to more appropriately reflect the value of the investments in the financial statements. The investments were
$39
and
$34
as of
October 30, 2016
, and
July 31, 2016
, respectively, and are included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the fair values of investments for which the fair value option was elected are included in Other expenses / (income) on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Changes in the fair value were not material through
October 30, 2016
. Current assets and liabilities of Acre were not material as of
October 30, 2016
, or
July 31, 2016
.
|
|
11.
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
We categorize financial assets and liabilities based on the following fair value hierarchy:
|
|
•
|
Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
|
|
|
•
|
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with observable market data.
|
|
|
•
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs, which are valued based on our estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
|
Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. When available, we use unadjusted quoted market prices to measure the fair value and classify such items as Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available, we base fair value upon internally developed models that use current market-based or independently sourced market parameters such as interest rates and currency rates. Included in the fair value of derivative instruments is an adjustment for credit and nonperformance risk.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
October 30, 2016
, and
July 31, 2016
, consistent with the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
as of
October 30,
2016
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at
October 30, 2016 Using
Fair Value Hierarchy
|
|
Fair Value
as of
July 31,
2016
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at
July 31, 2016 Using
Fair Value Hierarchy
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
(1)
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts
(2)
|
5
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deferred compensation derivative contracts
(3)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
Fair value option investments
(4)
|
38
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
25
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
as of
October 30,
2016
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at
October 30, 2016 Using
Fair Value Hierarchy
|
|
Fair Value
as of
July 31,
2016
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at
July 31, 2016 Using
Fair Value Hierarchy
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward starting interest rate swaps
(5)
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
(1)
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts
(2)
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deferred compensation derivative contracts
(3)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deferred compensation obligation
(6)
|
119
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
___________________________________
|
|
(1)
|
Based on observable market transactions of spot currency rates and forward rates.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Based on quoted futures exchanges and on observable prices of futures and options transactions in the marketplace.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Based on LIBOR and equity index swap rates.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Primarily represents investments in equity securities that are not readily marketable and are accounted for under the fair value option. The investments were funded by Acre. See Note 10 for additional information. Fair value is based on analyzing recent transactions and transactions of comparable companies, and the discounted cash flow method. In addition, allocation methods, including the option pricing method, are used in distributing fair value among various equity holders according to rights and preferences. Changes in the fair value of investments were not material through
October 30, 2016
.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Based on LIBOR swap rates.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Based on the fair value of the participants’ investments.
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term borrowings, excluding the current portion of long-term debt, approximate fair value.
Cash equivalents of
$116
at
October 30, 2016
, and
$74
at
July 31, 2016
, represent fair value as these highly liquid investments have an original maturity of three months or less. Fair value of cash equivalents is based on Level 2 inputs.
The fair value of long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt in Short-term borrowings, was
$2,860
at
October 30, 2016
, and
$2,949
at
July 31, 2016
. The carrying value was
$2,723
at
October 30, 2016
, and
$2,755
at
July 31, 2016
. The fair value of long-term debt is principally estimated using Level 2 inputs based on quoted market prices or pricing models using current market rates.
In June 2011, the Board authorized the purchase of up to
$1,000
of our stock. This program has no expiration date. In addition to this publicly announced program, we also have a separate Board authorization to purchase shares to offset the impact of dilution from shares issued under our stock compensation plans.
During the
three-month
period ended
October 30, 2016
, we repurchased
2 million
shares at a cost of
$112
. Of this amount,
$100
was used to repurchase shares pursuant to our June 2011 publicly announced share repurchase program. Approximately
$350
remained available under this program as of
October 30, 2016
. During the
three-month
period ended
November 1, 2015
, we repurchased
1 million
shares at a cost of
$32
.
|
|
13.
|
Stock-based Compensation
|
We provide compensation benefits by issuing stock options, unrestricted stock and restricted stock units (including time-lapse restricted stock units, EPS performance restricted stock units, total shareholder return (TSR) performance restricted stock units,
strategic performance restricted stock units and special performance restricted stock units). In 2017, we issued stock options, time-lapse restricted stock units, EPS performance restricted stock units and TSR performance restricted stock units. We have not issued strategic performance restricted stock units or special performance restricted stock units in 2017.
Total pre-tax stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings was
$14
and
$13
for the three-month periods ended
October 30, 2016
, and
November 1, 2015
, respectively. Tax-related benefits of
$5
were also recognized for the three-month periods ended
October 30, 2016
, and
November 1, 2015
. Cash received from the exercise of stock options was
$1
for the three-month period ended
November 1, 2015
, and is reflected in cash flows from financing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The following table summarizes stock option activity as of
October 30, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
(Options in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2016
|
681
|
|
|
$
|
50.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
489
|
|
|
$
|
54.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminated
|
(95
|
)
|
|
$
|
52.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 30, 2016
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
52.02
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Exercisable at October 30, 2016
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
50.21
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three-month period ended
November 1, 2015
, was not material. We measure the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected term of options granted was based on the weighted average time of vesting and the end of the contractual term. We utilized this simplified method as we do not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term.
The assumptions and grant-date fair values for grants in 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.28%
|
|
1.68%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
2.26%
|
|
2.46%
|
Expected volatility
|
18.64%
|
|
18.35%
|
Expected term
|
6 years
|
|
6 years
|
Grant-date fair value
|
$7.51
|
|
$6.86
|
We expense stock options on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, except for awards issued to retirement eligible participants, which we expense on an accelerated basis. As of
October 30, 2016
, total remaining unearned compensation related to nonvested stock options was
$4
, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining service period of
1.4 years
.
The following table summarizes time-lapse restricted stock units, EPS performance restricted stock units, strategic performance restricted stock units and special performance restricted stock units as of
October 30, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
|
|
(Restricted stock
units in thousands)
|
|
|
Nonvested at July 31, 2016
|
2,004
|
|
|
$
|
45.08
|
|
Granted
|
520
|
|
|
$
|
54.72
|
|
Vested
|
(905
|
)
|
|
$
|
43.87
|
|
Forfeited
|
(307
|
)
|
|
$
|
42.05
|
|
Nonvested at October 30, 2016
|
1,312
|
|
|
$
|
50.45
|
|
We determine the fair value of time-lapse restricted stock units, EPS performance restricted stock units, strategic performance restricted stock units and special performance restricted stock units based on the quoted price of our stock at the date of grant. We
expense time-lapse restricted stock units on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, except for awards issued to retirement-eligible participants, which we expense on an accelerated basis. We expense EPS performance restricted stock units on a graded-vesting basis, except for awards issued to retirement-eligible participants, which we expense on an accelerated basis. There were
155 thousand
EPS performance target grants outstanding at
October 30, 2016
, with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of
$49.89
. The actual number of EPS performance restricted stock units issued at the vesting date could range from
0%
or
100%
of the initial grant, depending on actual performance achieved. We estimate expense based on the number of awards expected to vest. In the first quarter of 2017, recipients of strategic performance restricted stock units earned
35%
of the initial grants based on actual performance achieved during a three-year period ended July 31, 2016. There were no strategic performance restricted stock units outstanding at
October 30, 2016
.
In 2015, we issued special performance restricted stock units for which vesting is contingent upon meeting various financial goals and performance milestones to support innovation and growth initiatives. These awards vested in the first quarter of 2017 and are included in the table above. Recipients of special performance restricted stock units earned
0%
of the initial grants based upon financial goals and
100%
of the initial grants based upon performance milestones to support innovation and growth initiatives.
As of
October 30, 2016
, total remaining unearned compensation related to nonvested time-lapse restricted stock units and EPS performance restricted stock units was
$42
, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining service period of
1.8 years
. The fair value of restricted stock units vested during the three-month periods ended
October 30, 2016
, and
November 1, 2015
, was
$50
and
$40
, respectively. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the restricted stock units granted during the three-month period ended
November 1, 2015
, was
$49.94
.
The following table summarizes TSR performance restricted stock units as of
October 30, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
|
|
(Restricted stock
units in thousands)
|
|
|
Nonvested at July 31, 2016
|
1,641
|
|
|
$
|
49.13
|
|
Granted
|
606
|
|
|
$
|
39.53
|
|
Vested
|
(251
|
)
|
|
$
|
36.26
|
|
Forfeited
|
(124
|
)
|
|
$
|
41.58
|
|
Nonvested at October 30, 2016
|
1,872
|
|
|
$
|
48.25
|
|
We estimated the fair value of TSR performance restricted stock units at the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation. Assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulation were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.85%
|
|
0.92%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
2.26%
|
|
2.46%
|
Expected volatility
|
17.78%
|
|
17.25%
|
Expected term
|
3 years
|
|
3 years
|
We recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the service period. As of
October 30, 2016
, total remaining unearned compensation related to TSR performance restricted stock units was
$46
, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining service period of
2.1
years. In the first quarter of 2017, recipients of TSR performance restricted stock units earned
75%
of the initial grants based upon our TSR ranking in a performance peer group during a three-year period ended July 29, 2016. In the first quarter of 2016, recipients of TSR performance restricted stock units earned
100%
of the initial grants based upon our TSR ranking in a performance peer group during a three-year period ended July 31, 2015. The fair value of TSR performance restricted stock units vested during the three-month periods ended
October 30, 2016
, and
November 1, 2015
, was
$14
and
$22
, respectively. The grant-date fair value of the TSR performance restricted stock units granted during 2016 was
$62.44
.
The excess tax benefits on the exercise of stock options and vested restricted stock presented as cash flows from operating activities for the three-month periods ended
October 30, 2016
, and
November 1, 2015
, were
$6
.
|
|
14.
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
We are involved in various pending or threatened legal or regulatory proceedings, including purported class actions, arising from the conduct of business both in the ordinary course and otherwise. Modern pleading practice in the U.S. permits considerable variation in the assertion of monetary damages or other relief. Jurisdictions may permit claimants not to specify the monetary damages sought or may permit claimants to state only that the amount sought is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court. In addition, jurisdictions may permit plaintiffs to allege monetary damages in amounts well exceeding reasonably possible verdicts in the jurisdiction for similar matters. This variability in pleadings, together with our actual experiences in litigating or resolving through settlement numerous claims over an extended period of time, demonstrates to management that the monetary relief which may be specified in a lawsuit or claim bears little relevance to its merits or disposition value.
Due to the unpredictable nature of litigation, the outcome of a litigation matter and the amount or range of potential loss at particular points in time is normally difficult to ascertain. Uncertainties can include how fact finders will evaluate documentary evidence and the credibility and effectiveness of witness testimony, and how trial and appellate courts will apply the law in the context of the pleadings or evidence presented, whether by motion practice, or at trial or on appeal. Disposition valuations are also subject to the uncertainty of how opposing parties and their counsel will themselves view the relevant evidence and applicable law.
We establish liabilities for litigation and regulatory loss contingencies when information related to the loss contingencies shows both that it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. It is possible that some matters could require us to pay damages or make other expenditures or establish accruals in amounts that could not be reasonably estimated as of October 30, 2016. While the potential future charges could be material in a particular quarter or annual period, based on information currently known by management, management does not believe any such charges are likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 30,
2016
|
|
July 31,
2016
|
Raw materials, containers and supplies
|
$
|
422
|
|
|
$
|
391
|
|
Finished products
|
542
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
964
|
|
|
$
|
940
|
|