gitreal
2 weeks ago
You seem a little preoccupied by Jack.....are you jealous of the fact he knows more about geology, exploration, and mining (especially in the area of ACRL's supposed claims) than you and all the pumper clowns could ever possibly know, collectively? Pretty ironic that a geologist with no financial interest in ACRL has done so much to shed light on all the shady ACRL shenanigans.
Maybe next time you invest in a shitty OTC "mining" company, make sure they promote mining properties not so close to home.....the best mining scams hype mining operations or claims that nobody could possibly visit, or research.....like in areas of cartel-controlled Mexico, or in Peru, or Indonesia, or Zimbabwe. Those kinds of scams do so well because nosy investors and critics will never visit, information is very hard to come by, and the scammers can be assured their lies will go mostly unchallenged.
Got assays yet?
Decemberschild
2 weeks ago
LOL I gotta tell you after checking in here after being away I just have to laugh at the old players all still trying to pump up this pos. For the nostaligic among you, for a nice list of the bullshit Glen and company have put out in attempts to force-feed naive investors, this is the best one. A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away I sent this into the regulator in Canada and discussed it on the phone with a staff member who found it all to be very interesting. I remember we stopped at around six or seven breaches of Canadian securities law. It was easy, I just asked for each point if that was allowed to be said. I guess this document along with several other stupid things they have done under various management since this document was put out there is the big reason that CTO is still hanging over investors heads. Just look at the bullshit it contains. I skiimed through a lot of the last posts checking for names and see the golden egg is still around though he seems quiet of late. I had to laugh when I saw the skiluc make a return but only one post? Guess he wants more money to push this shit out there. Next thing you know old weezer will be back gasping his lies. So if I read some of this later postings they have actually or supposedly drilled? I wonder if they took any salt shakers with them? I just read there is renewed interest in Bre-X again and that maybe the guy who fell out of the helicopter is now living in the Cayman Islands. Maybe he is giving advice to wannabe's.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cdtRFtx1fSmjvmatx9DzkfCLXC3_kMjd/view
The link probably will be killed soon but that's okay the regulators have it all anyway.
Oh, reko-retread, don't get excited, its all bs but I know how much you like licking your finger and seeing which way the wind blows before offering up an opinion. Its a good thing you are a Canucklehead otherwise you would have been buying this crap all the way down so you should buy the regulators a big Christmas present and thank them for saving your butt. Maybe you are part of the management team since you live in BC. Hey are you Glen?
Jack_Herer
2 weeks ago
Yep, although we donβt know definitively how much, if any, theyβve drilled, nor where. The lack of an official, technical, QP-signed PR and assays is concerning.
From a greenfields discovery to production is usually a minimum of 10 years, sometimes considerably longer. And they have yet to make that initial discovery.
But you know thatβ¦.
Jack_Herer
2 weeks ago
Not specifically preaching to you Reko, you appear to understand the fundamentals of this business.
This is directed more at the likes of Jacinda, Rotten Eggs, Touchy-Feely, Baboon, Skillet et al who favour crayon drawn rivers-of-gold maps over true geological understanding.
To be clear, I am not stating the possibility of a gold discovery at THE TANNAHILL!!! or Atascama 3 near KL is ZERO. But given their LOCATION and geological setting, a "significant' (potentially economically exploitable) discovery is a looooooong shot, and if there is a discovery it's likely to be small to tiny. These properties are absolutely not in "elephant country" geology...
Just the geo-facts, Jacinda. No BS.
Jack_Herer
2 weeks ago
Absolutely true. Location, location. location!
THE TANNAHILL!!! is no where near KL, being ~ 33 km to the NE. Not even in the same greenstone belt.
In this neck of the woods, for significant gold deposits you want to be on or just north of either the Cadillac-Larder Lake fault zone (which runs along the southern edge of the KL gold camp, or the Porcupine-Destor fault zone which runs just south of the Timmins camp and along the Golden Highway east of Matheson.
THE TANNAHILL!!! sits in no man's land between these two major crustal breaks and in older, very different geology from the greenstone belts that host the Timmins and KL camps. There is simply no significant gold prospects in this area between the two faults, and quite unlikely a significant (> 0.5 Moz) deposit will be discovered in this geology. IMHO.
Y'all should ask, how did Atascama so easily/cheaply acquire THE TANNAHILL!!!? Because nobody (with any geological smarts) wants it.
Just the geo-facts, Juanita. No BS.
reko01
2 weeks ago
Itβs all about location. Kirkland Lake is the centre of the golden mile, and we believe weβre in the right spot to find all the right things to provide companies. Think of us like a store. We find all the necessities to find companies to grow, and we explore for them,β he said, adding they are currently expanding, drilling deeper to find the finer gold.
A store? Heheheheheh oh man.
Jack_Herer
2 weeks ago
Wasn't really a lie Bozo, I didn't specifically say I was there, I just alluded to it. Just yanking your collective chains. No sense of humour?
When it comes to geo/technical matters, just the facts from me Ma'am. It would violate the code of conduct of my professional association to lie about geological matters on a public forum. So rest assured, no lies on geology, but there is some latitude for interpretation based on my professional experiences that could differ from other geo's interpretation. As they say, put three geos on an outcrop and you'll probably get four different opinions/interpretations of the geological history of that outcrop...
So, Juanita, no worries they've not been very forthcoming with assays from drilling conducted 3.5 months ago? Assuming they took a few samples from their drilling (they claimed 2,000 samples), assays should have been back ages ago, especially with the much heralded 3-day turnaround time. It's very curious, no?
Jack_Herer
2 weeks ago
Haven't been back to Timmins in 20 years. If you've ever had the 'pleasure' of visiting Timmins, you would appreciate my reluctance to return. So full disclosure - I wasn't at the Timmins Mining Expo, have never met the Atascama clowns, and I have no idea if they drilled or not.
I'm guessing they did some drilling - they obtained a drill permit, posted some pics of a drill rig in the snow and a pic of some (boring) drill core at the Timmins Mining Expo, although it could all be a ruse. I'm skeptical they drilled 17 holes though given the likely cost ($300-500K?). Maybe just one or two holes?
And with the lack of PR's dripping with awesome assays (which should be back by now with their touted mystery lab 3-day turnaround), I gotta conclude the assays weren't terribly newsworthy.
Wonder how long the Bozos will wait for HOT assays before accepting there might not be any coming?
Sure gone quiet. Maybe someone should call the cops for a welfare check?