Baron Capital Enterprise Inc (CE) (BCAP) Quote

Wally you are the King of no class!! Money and success has always ran far away from You!! Lol!!

You got nothing!! Sweet and lo......!!

News flash....he's the Ceo of BCAP!!

You see they disappeared for a while!! They ran out of content!! I've never seen people with no class try to put down others!!

guess we are now the SONG board! Anything goes! have fun- see you in a couple months

Literally hoping for illegal pump and dumps to take place, that's some real scumbag type 💩 right there.

He most likely dumped his shares by now.

Funny how you regard Jake P. Noch as a savior and hero here but this is what you said about him on the SONG board:

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174470189

All these penny stock directors are slimeballs. They are the worst individuals in the world.

...and ridiculed people who invested in Jake P. Noch's other stock SONG whose playbook Jake appears to be following here with BCAP - massive dilution, reverse splits and stock price crashes.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174469452

1:500000 omfg, shareholders got SONG'd

Yes, that's a 1 for 500000 reverse split!

Yet here he's a hero.

What a hypocrite you are.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7gmvd/spotify-sues-self-described-music-prodigy-who-allegedly-ran-royalties-scam


Spotify Sues Self-Described 'Music Prodigy' Who Allegedly Ran Royalties Scam

Spotify says Jake Noch "[generated] hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams" and engaged in "title track parasitism" among other fraudulent practices on its platform.

JC

By Jelisa Castrodale

May 19, 2020, 4:38pm

Last November, the 20-year-old head of indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment filed a massive (and massively complicated) lawsuit against Spotify, alleging that the digital music service hadn't paid royalties on more than 550 million streams of its songs. According to Billboard, Sosa Entertainment founder Jake Noch also named his other company, PRO Music Rights, as a plaintiff in the lawsuit, and the co-plaintiffs sought millions of dollars in damages, asking for $150,000 for each infringement.

Noch's lawsuit accused Spotify of a number of transgressions, including unfair and deceptive business practices, willfully removing Sosa Entertainment's content, "obliterating" his expectations, and refusing to pay royalties. In a statement, Noch said that he was willing to "fight to the end" if it meant that Spotify would ultimately compensate the artists who were affected.

"I have a duty to see this through so that I can pay my artists what they are owed from Spotify," he said. "I know others feel the same way as I blaze this trail for the music community, who I know is behind me and roots for our success in bringing down Spotify."

Part of Noch's problems with the company started in the spring of 2017 when Spotify removed all of Sosa Entertainment's song's from its servers and "blanket banned" Noch and his companies from using the platform going forward. According to Noch—who describes himself as a "musical prodigy" in his lawsuit—Spotify informed him that the songs were removed because of "abnormal streaming activity," but the company didn't give him the opportunity to explain what could've caused the weird-looking streaming data. Noch has alleged that Spotify just "fabricated a reason" to kick him off the platform, in an attempt to avoid having to pay the royalties that he was due.

But in its own countersuit, filed on Monday, Spotify says no, it was just because of the abnormal streaming, and also because Noch allegedly "designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams" in order to game the system and rack up a ton of royalty payments.

"Starting in 2016, Noch designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams on songs he had seeded on Spotify’s online music-streaming service," the company's complaint reads. "Noch’s objective was plain: to manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters."

Billboard reports that Spotify removed Noch's content from its platform after being contacted by a whistleblower who claimed that Noch had instructed a bot farmer to create literally millions of fake accounts to stream songs from the Sosa Entertainment catalog. Spotify's own analysts became suspicious when one of Noch's records went from zero streams to 400,000 in under a week, while a second album racked up 749,000 streams in two days. (Spotify also apparently determined that 5,500 of the accounts that played the latter record supposedly all lived in the same American town—even though the town's total population was just around 10,000 people.)

The company has also accused Noch of "title track parasitism," which involves uploading songs with the same name and punctuation of legitimate hit songs. Spotify's legal filing identified two "AI-generated sound loops" that had been given the same name as then-popular tracks by DJ Snake and XXXTentacion.

"This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history," Spotify wrote in its complaint. The company's countersuit is asking for compensation for a long list of Noch's alleged transgressions, including fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices.

Damn, most 20-year-olds can only dream of being dragged that hard by an international streaming service. A musical prodigy, indeed.

https://www.billboard.com/pro/spotify-indie-label-streaming-fraud-millions-fake-accounts-countersuit/

Spotify Countersues Indie Label, Alleging Massive Streaming Fraud & Millions of Fake Accounts

Spotify has countersued indie label Sosa Entertainment and its founder Jake Noch, alleging massive streaming fraud, unjust enrichment and the creation of millions of fake accounts to generate…

In November 2019, indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment and its founder, 20-year-old Jake Noch, filed a lawsuit against Spotify that alleged the streaming service failed to pay royalties on over 550 million streams of its music. The suit, which was also brought on behalf of Noch’s PRO Pro Music Rights (which was later removed), sought $150,000 in statutory damages for each infringement, and alleged that Spotify removed its music not because it detected “abnormal streaming activity,” as the service claimed, but because it was trying to dodge paying royalties on the streams.

Now, Spotify has fired back with a countersuit alleging that Noch “designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams” in order to “manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters.” The filing, which is supported by screenshots of messages allegedly between Noch and a “bot farmer” and charts that show streams on Noch’s music go from zero into the hundreds of thousands in a matter of days, also alleges that Noch directed the bot farmer to create millions of fake accounts and changed the names of songs in his catalog to closely resemble those of established hit songs, like XXXTentacion’s “SAD!” and DJ Snake’s “Taki Taki.”

Spotify has countersued indie label Sosa Entertainment and its founder Jake Noch, alleging massive streaming fraud, unjust enrichment and the creation of millions of fake accounts to generate…

BY DAN RYS

In November 2019, indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment and its founder, 20-year-old Jake Noch, filed a lawsuit against Spotify that alleged the streaming service failed to pay royalties on over 550 million streams of its music. The suit, which was also brought on behalf of Noch’s PRO Pro Music Rights (which was later removed), sought $150,000 in statutory damages for each infringement, and alleged that Spotify removed its music not because it detected “abnormal streaming activity,” as the service claimed, but because it was trying to dodge paying royalties on the streams.

Now, Spotify has fired back with a countersuit alleging that Noch “designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams” in order to “manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters.” The filing, which is supported by screenshots of messages allegedly between Noch and a “bot farmer” and charts that show streams on Noch’s music go from zero into the hundreds of thousands in a matter of days, also alleges that Noch directed the bot farmer to create millions of fake accounts and changed the names of songs in his catalog to closely resemble those of established hit songs, like XXXTentacion’s “SAD!” and DJ Snake’s “Taki Taki.”

Indie Hip-Hop Label Files Suit Against Spotify Over Catalog Takedown

Noch, who lists himself as the chief executive of Sosa and Pro Music Rights, as well as a handful of additional music companies, has quite the proud litigious history, having released several press releases touting lawsuits against Spotify, Apple, Google, YouTube, Amazon, SoundCloud, Pandora, Deezer, iHeartRadio and more. Pro Music Rights claims a database of some 2 million tracks, including more than 23,000 by various artists using some form of the name “LEGATO,” like LEGATO_DIMY, LEGATODE45, LEGATODI001, LEGATOGILL2002 and LEGATOKAL999, to name a few.

According to Spotify’s counterclaim, filed Monday (May 18), the service first detected artificial streaming activity on Noch’s content in March 2016 and eventually banned his music from the service, before extending that ban to all content related to Noch. Noch then tried to “smuggle” the content back onto the service using slightly different names and created millions of fake accounts to stream that music.

In June 2016, a whistleblower contacted Spotify with screenshots that purported to show Noch directing the person to create millions (direct quote: “i need millions”) of fake accounts. And while Spotify had identified the fraud a few months prior, the company had already paid a small amount of royalties to Sosa and Noch — royalties that otherwise would have gone to legitimate songwriters with songs being streamed by legitimate fans. According to the complaint, for one of Noch’s albums that jumped from zero streams to more than 400,000 in just days, 99% of its streams came from Spotify’s ad-supported free tier and from accounts registered to male users in the United States, a pattern that was also found for other works.

Noch then changed distributors and changed the names of some of his companies in order to dodge Spotify’s fraud detection systems, with slightly different artist names, song titles and cover artwork. In one section of the complaint, attorneys wrote that “analysts at Spotify found that 5,500 ‘users’ streaming one of the Sosa albums ‘originated’ from a small American town with a total population of 10,000. For that album, the stream count jumped from zero to 749,000 streams in a span of only two days… This pattern is highly anomalous and not at all correlated to any possible pattern of genuine streaming activity.”

In another example from the complaint, in what the filing calls “title track parasitism,” Noch and Sosa uploaded tracks called “SAD!” with the same punctuation as the XXXTentacion hit, and “Taki Take,” shortly after the similarly-named DJ Snake song reached the top 20 of the Billboard Hot 100. Some of the tracks that Noch and Sosa would release on Spotify were AI-generated sound loops.

In all, Spotify’s counterclaim seeks relief for fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices. As another line in the complaint reads, “This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history.”

After the publication of this story, Noch provided a comment to Billboard which reads, in part, “Spotify’s claims are laughable… I also greatly look forward to the day we get to go to court, and I hope that all of Spotify’s shareholders will pay close attention to these cases… Time will prove that we are right.”

Guess who's back?? Good points Lime!! Seems you have this under control!! Next week we should hear something regarding the Books 📚!!

0,2 $

I hope you buy the whole float. Darcy also thought I was wrong... now he has a restraining order 😂

Every .0001 I will scoop up for a trade in 2025. You are so badly mistaken here. lolol

Scam is busted already, he doesnt get a redo, everyone knows his scam. I'm not confused, you are reading the room wrong.

BTW, another guy spouting crazy stuff and conspiracies about me just had a restraining order placed in him about 1 hr ago. Jakey has no idea what hes done...

You are very mentally confused. This is not a SONG. SONG hit good in a good market. This will also hit good in a good market, that's why it's best to buy now when it is idle. Trust me bruh

He needed a huge pump on SONG too, instead he did a RS and DUMPED. Sorry, but your entire thesis is murdered with this scammer. Luckily im here to save you.

It needs a HUGE pump to sell that many when only top these days is 50k on the most OTC Top Traded. This will go through a huge pump, that's what I am trying to explain to you. Buy it now, sell half at double and hold the other half for a huge yuge run up.

Past tense, he NEEDED commons to take custody. He now has custody, he can sell them (prob has) and $6m more plus his buddy can sell $1m per year. You didnt read the court docs my guy.

He has common shares in every one. You need to have common shares to take custody. Each one will have a pump. That's why I am buying. The CEO is very smart and very good at satisfying FINRA comments. There is no way this doesn't see a pump. He's invested into this for a future run and so am I. This is so bullish right now

You keep making an irrelevant point. Whether it is SONG or not, Jake is currently doing X under the same agreement he is seeking with BCAP. There is no reason to think he won't do the same here. This isn't the past, it is the present. To say a CEO's current actions under the same agreement won't be the same is foolish. I love it, keep buying!

This isn't a SONG though. It's a new venture. It doesn't matter what happened there. This is a completely different entity. I'm not sure why you are having a hard time understanding this.

Can't don't own any. I have one SONG share for legal purposes... it's down A LOT. Because Jakey is dumping tons of 3a10 shares like he'll use yall for exit liquidity.

Don't worry, Ill save you.

Surely. Can you dump some to me?

Keep loading 😂☠️😂☠️😂☠️

CEO is young. It's a lifetime investment. It will run up huge from this price, that's guaranteed. I wish there were more OTC CEOs that would do this 🚀

The more, the merrier

Good luck on that pump with Jakes $7 million per anum in dilution. Still stuck on those common shares and can't wrap your head around how that 3a10 works ehhhh? Maybe Jake could take a moment to explain it on here for everyone. How bout it Jake, care to explain how it works?

Far from true. CEO has Common shares here. It will pump bigtime.

Jake must have needed $80 for his greens fees or some lunch money.

Someone got 400,000 cheap shares

Let's see if they will unhand those precious Books!!

Get loaded up with the trips of your choice!! Election time will bring relief to the Otc!! Be prepared!!

I got our board back fellas!! See how I run circles around my competition?? Lol!! It's safe to come out Jake!!

0.20!? Yes that’d be amazing haha

0,2

Bcap to the moon 🌙 Alice!!

In Jake we trust 🚀

BCAP woot woot 😀

"The reverse split was a bad idea [because it was easier to sucker ya'll into buying in trips to sell my shares in to]" - Jakey

Big Money no Whammies!!

Correct near term prediction for SONG but this is a BCAP forum.

0,2

Wrong Wally!! You have to be Original!! That's why you're chasing around someone younger than You!! Lol!!

Just because Jake has a risk factor disclaimer outlining his mental disabilities with an emphasis on his inexperience or lack of knowledge pertaining to running a publicly traded company does not give him carte blanche to disregard the law and commit crimes.

Guess who's son was caught running streaming and 3a10 share schemes now awaiting accountability for their actions?? Just shows you how real life works!!

One more side note Wally!! Guess who's son was caught treating his nose during the Olympics?? Just shows you how real life works!!

Michael Jordan terrorized his opponents!! Even lied about statements they made!! Michael Jordan had to fail many times before he tasted greatness!! Many of you never pursued that so you have no idea!! I've done it several times so I know what it's like!! You guys would rather sit back and critique others instead of trying to achieve something!! Suit yourself but respect the go getters!!

That's a good one Wally!! See I'm not biased!!

Imagine being 12 years old and not being able to control your emotions so badly you are willing to lie in court to try and scare people into not speaking the truth. Time to buckle up buddy, the illegal 3a10 scam cant last forever.

Feds will be comin'

Michael Jordan would be a very good role model for Jake.

Michael Jordan played as part of a team, and was an exceptionally good member of the team.
Jake pretends he's leading a team but is actually trying to play all the positions himself.

Michael Jordan never threatened to sue the entire opposing team and all their fans at every game simply for being the opposition.

It is entirely possible that within a few years child BRICK GOD SOSA (aka Shaky Jake) will have the opportunity to meet and even have a meal with Sean "Diddy" Combs. Shaky Jake might even be able to buy a fractional royalty interest in one of Diddy's post-CONviction prison songs for the low, low price of a few packages of mackerel and some ramen noodles from the commissary.