LSE Caplease,

Certain Prospective Financial Information

The Company does not as a matter of course make public projections as to future performance, earnings or other results beyond the current fiscal year due to the unpredictability of the underlying assumptions and estimates. However, the Company provided to ARCP, in connection with its review of information regarding the Company, certain standalone financial projections for the fiscal years 2013 through 2015 that had been prepared by management of the Company for internal planning purposes and that are subjective in many respects. The Company also provided standalone financial projections for the fiscal years 2013 through 2018 to the Company’s board of directors and the Company’s financial advisors, as updated by the Company’s management to reflect actual results or conditions. The prospective financial information reflected in the standalone financial projections is set forth in the table below in a manner consistent with the Company’s historical financial reporting and referred to in this document as the projections. The Company believes that the projections reflect the current long-term business plan for the Company on a go-forward, standalone basis.

The projections have been prepared by, and are the responsibility of, the Company’s management. The projections were not prepared with a view toward public disclosure and, accordingly, do not necessarily comply with published guidelines of the SEC, the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of financial forecasts, or generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. Neither the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm nor any other independent accountants have audited, compiled or performed any procedures with respect to the projections or expressed an opinion or any form of assurance related thereto. The projections are included in this document solely because they were made available to ARCP, the Company’s board of directors and the Company’s financial advisors in connection with the merger, and are not being included in this document to influence a stockholder’s decision whether to approve the merger proposal, make any investment decision or for any other purpose.

The projections, while presented with numerical specificity, necessarily were based on numerous variables and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and many of which are beyond the control of the Company’s management. Because the projections cover multiple years, by their nature, they become subject to greater uncertainty with each successive year. The assumptions upon which the projections were based necessarily involve subjective judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, industry, competitive and financial market conditions, including interest rates, the Company’s ability to refinance or satisfy its indebtedness when due, the Company’s ability to acquire new properties and finance such acquisitions, the Company’s ability to raise capital by selling shares of its capital stock and the Company’s ability to lease its properties, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the Company’s control. The projections also reflect assumptions as to certain business decisions that are subject to change. In addition, the projections may be affected by the Company’s ability to successfully implement a number of initiatives to improve its operations and financial performance. The projections also may be affected by the Company’s ability to achieve strategic goals, objectives and targets over the applicable periods. In addition, the projections do not take into account the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or the effect of any failure of the mergers to occur, and should not be viewed as necessarily indicative of actual or continuing results in that context.

Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the projections will be realized, and actual results may vary materially from those shown, including because of the risks and other factors described in “Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 17. The inclusion of the projections in this document should not be regarded as an indication that the Company or any of its affiliates, advisors, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives considered or consider the projections to be predictive of actual future events, and the projections should not be relied upon as such. Neither the Company nor any of its affiliates, advisors, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives can give any assurance that actual results will not differ from the projections, and none of them undertakes any obligation to update or otherwise revise or reconcile the projections to reflect circumstances existing after the date the projections were generated or to reflect the occurrence of future events even in the event that any or all of the assumptions underlying the projections are shown to be in error. The Company does not intend to make publicly available any update or other revision to the projections, except as otherwise required by law. Neither the Company nor any of its affiliates, advisors, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives has made or makes any representation or warranty to any stockholder of the Company or other person regarding the ultimate performance of the Company compared to the information contained in the projections or that the projections will be achieved. The Company has made no representation or warranty to ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership or Merger Sub or their affiliates, in the merger agreement or otherwise, concerning the projections.

Certain of the prospective financial information in the projections, including funds from operations (FFO) and cash available for distribution (CAD), may be considered non-GAAP financial measures. The Company believes FFO and CAD are useful measures of the Company’s financial performance, as these measures are commonly used by the investment community in evaluating the performance of an equity REIT. The Company also believes that these measures are useful because they adjust for a variety of non-cash items (like depreciation and amortization, in the case of FFO, and depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation and straight-line rent adjustments, in the case of CAD). FFO and CAD should not be considered as alternatives to net income or earnings per share determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. Since all companies and analysts do not calculate FFO and CAD in a similar fashion, the Company’s calculation of FFO and CAD may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

The Company calculates FFO consistent with the definition of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, or net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property and impairment losses on depreciable real estate, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Real estate-related depreciation includes amortization of capitalized leasing expenses, tenant allowances or improvements, and excludes amortization of deferred financing costs.

The Company also evaluates FFO as adjusted for items that affect comparability, as it believes this measure is a useful proxy for existing portfolio performance and, therefore, provides a meaningful presentation of operating performance. Items that affect comparability may include gains or losses on the Company’s debt investments that, unlike gains or losses on owned properties, are not excluded from FFO under the NAREIT definition, gain or loss on debt extinguishment, debt modification costs and property acquisition costs. FFO as adjusted for items that affect comparability should not be considered as an alternative to net income or earnings per share determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. It also differs from the NAREIT’s definition of FFO and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

The Company calculates CAD by further adjusting FFO as adjusted for comparability to exclude straight-line rent adjustments, stock-based compensation, above or below market rent amortization and non-cash interest income and expense, and to include routine capital expenditures on investments in real property and capitalized interest expense (if any).

The Company included these non-GAAP financial measures in the projections because the Company believed they could be useful in evaluating, on a prospective basis, the Company’s potential operating performance. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information presented in compliance with GAAP, and non-GAAP financial measures as used by the Company may not be comparable to similarly titled amounts used by other companies.

In light of the foregoing factors and the uncertainties inherent in the projections, the Company’s stockholders are cautioned not to place undue, if any, reliance on the projections.

The projections are forward-looking statements. For more information on factors that may cause the Company’s future financial results to vary materially, see “Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 17.

The following table sets forth the projections:

The projections should be evaluated, if at all, in conjunction with the historical financial statements and other information regarding the Company contained elsewhere in this document and the Company’s public filings with the SEC.

Opinions of the Company’s Financial Advisors

Opinion of Wells Fargo Securities

The Company retained Wells Fargo Securities to act as the Company’s financial advisor in connection with the merger. As part of Wells Fargo Securities’ engagement, the Company’s board of directors requested that Wells Fargo Securities evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the common merger consideration to be received pursuant to the merger agreement by holders of Company common stock (other than ARCP and its affiliates). On May 28, 2013, at a meeting of the Company’s board of directors held to evaluate the merger, Wells Fargo Securities rendered to the Company’s board of directors an oral opinion, confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated May 28, 2013, to the effect that, as of such date and based on and subject to various qualifications, limitations and assumptions stated in its opinion, the common merger consideration to be received pursuant to the merger agreement by holders of Company common stock (other than ARCP and its affiliates) was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

The full text of Wells Fargo Securities’ written opinion, dated May 28, 2013, to the Company’s board of directors is attached as Annex B to this document and is incorporated in this document by reference. The written opinion sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered and limitations on the review undertaken by Wells Fargo Securities in rendering its opinion. The following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion. The opinion was addressed to the Company’s board of directors (in its capacity as such) for its information and use in connection with its evaluation of the common merger consideration from a financial point of view, and did not address any other terms, aspects or implications of the merger or any related transactions. Wells Fargo Securities’ opinion did not address the merits of the underlying decision by the Company to enter into the merger agreement or the relative merits of the merger or any related transactions compared with other business strategies or transactions available or that have been or might be considered by the Company’s management or the Company’s board of directors or in which the Company might engage. The opinion should not be construed as creating any fiduciary duty on the part of Wells Fargo Securities to any party and the opinion does not constitute a recommendation to the Company’s board of directors or any other person or entity in respect of the merger or any related transactions, including as to how any holder of any of the Company’s securities should vote or act in connection with the merger, any related transactions or any other matters.

The terms of the merger and related transactions were determined through negotiations between the Company and ARCP, rather than by any financial advisor, and the decision to enter into the merger agreement was solely that of the Company’s board of directors. Wells Fargo Securities did not recommend any specific form of consideration to the Company’s board of directors or that any specific form of consideration constituted the only appropriate consideration for the merger. The opinion was only one of many factors considered by the Company’s board of directors in its evaluation of the merger and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of the Company’s board of directors, the Company’s management or any other party with respect to the merger or the consideration payable in the merger.

In arriving at its opinion, Wells Fargo Securities, among other things:

●      reviewed an execution version, dated as of May 28, 2013, of the merger agreement, including the financial terms of the merger;

●      reviewed certain publicly available business, financial and other information regarding the Company, including information set forth in the Company’s annual reports to stockholders and annual reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012 and quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013;

●      reviewed certain other business and financial information regarding the Company furnished to Wells Fargo Securities by and discussed with the Company’s management, including financial forecasts and estimates prepared by the Company’s management for fiscal years ending December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2016;

●      discussed with the Company’s management the operations and prospects of the Company, including the historical financial performance and trends in the results of operations of the Company;

●      participated in discussions among representatives of the Company, ARCP and their respective advisors regarding the proposed merger;

●      reviewed reported prices and trading activity for Company common stock;

●      analyzed the estimated net asset value of the Company’s real estate portfolio based upon the financial forecasts and estimates referred to above and related assumptions discussed with and confirmed as reasonable by the Company’s management;

●      compared certain financial data of the Company with similar data of certain other publicly traded companies that Wells Fargo Securities deemed relevant in evaluating the Company;

●      analyzed the estimated present value of the future dividends per share of the Company based upon financial forecasts and estimates referred to above and related assumptions discussed with and confirmed as reasonable by the Company’s management; and

●      considered other information, such as financial studies, analyses and investigations, as well as financial, economic and market criteria, that Wells Fargo Securities deemed relevant.

In connection with its review, Wells Fargo Securities assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information provided, discussed with or otherwise made available to Wells Fargo Securities, including all accounting, tax, regulatory and legal information, and Wells Fargo Securities did not make (and assumed no responsibility for) any independent verification of such information. Wells Fargo Securities relied upon assurances of the Company’s management that it was not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or misleading. With respect to the financial forecasts, estimates and other information utilized in Wells Fargo Securities’ analyses, Wells Fargo Securities was advised by the Company’s management and, at the Company’s direction, Wells Fargo Securities assumed that they were reasonably prepared and reflected the best currently available estimates, judgments and assumptions of the Company’s management as to the future financial performance of the Company. Wells Fargo Securities assumed no responsibility for, and expressed no view as to, such forecasts, estimates or other information utilized in Wells Fargo Securities’ analyses or the judgments or assumptions upon which they were based. Wells Fargo Securities also assumed that there were no material changes in the condition (financial or otherwise), results of operations, business or prospects of the Company since the respective dates of the most recent financial statements and other information provided to Wells Fargo Securities. In arriving at its opinion, Wells Fargo Securities did not conduct physical inspections of the properties or assets of the Company or any other entity and it did not make, and was not provided with, any evaluations or appraisals of the properties, assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the Company or any other entity. In connection with Wells Fargo Securities’ engagement, Wells Fargo Securities was not requested to, and it did not, solicit third-party indications of interest in the possible acquisition of the Company; however, Wells Fargo Securities was requested to solicit such third-party indications of interest for a specified period after the date of the merger agreement as permitted under the provisions of the merger agreement.

In rendering its opinion, Wells Fargo Securities assumed, at the Company’s direction, that the final form of the merger agreement, when signed by the parties thereto, would not differ from the execution version of the merger agreement reviewed by Wells Fargo Securities in any respect meaningful to its analyses or opinion, that the merger and any related transactions would be consummated in accordance with the terms described in the merger agreement and in compliance with all applicable laws and other requirements, without amendment or waiver of any material terms or conditions, that, in the course of obtaining any necessary legal, regulatory or third party consents, approvals or agreements for the merger and any related transactions, no delay, limitation or restriction, including any divestiture or other requirements, would be imposed or action would be taken that would have an adverse effect on the Company, the merger or related transactions. Wells Fargo Securities was advised by representatives of the Company that the Company has operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes since its formation as a REIT. Wells Fargo Securities’ opinion was necessarily based on economic, market, financial and other conditions existing, and information made available to Wells Fargo Securities, as of the date of its opinion. The credit, financial and stock markets have been experiencing unusual volatility and Wells Fargo Securities expressed no opinion or view as to any potential effects of such volatility on the Company, the merger or related transactions. Although subsequent developments may affect the matters set forth in its opinion, Wells Fargo Securities does not have any obligation to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw its opinion or otherwise comment on or consider any such events occurring or coming to Wells Fargo Securities’ attention after the date of its opinion.

Wells Fargo Securities’ opinion only addressed the fairness, from a financial point of view and as of the date of its opinion, of the common merger consideration to be received pursuant to the merger agreement by holders of Company common stock (other than ARCP and its affiliates) to the extent expressly specified in its opinion and no opinion or view was expressed with respect to any other securities of the Company or any other party, including the consideration to be received or other amounts payable in the merger or any related transactions in respect of Company preferred stock, Company operating partnership units or membership interests in Merger Sub or upon redemption of any other securities of the Company in connection with the merger or any related transactions. Wells Fargo Securities’ opinion did not address any other terms, aspects or implications of the merger or any related transactions or any voting agreement or other agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in connection with or contemplated by the merger, any related transactions or otherwise, including, without limitation, the form or structure of the merger or any related transactions. In addition, Wells Fargo Securities’ opinion did not address the fairness of the amount or nature of, or any other aspects relating to, any compensation to be received by any officers, directors, managers or employees of any parties to the merger or any related transactions, or class of such persons, relative to the common merger consideration or otherwise. Wells Fargo Securities also did not express any view or opinion with respect to, and with the Company’s consent relied upon the assessments of the Company’s representatives regarding, accounting, tax, regulatory, legal or similar matters and Wells Fargo Securities understood that the Company obtained such advice as it deemed necessary from qualified professionals. Except as described in this summary, the Company imposed no other instructions or limitations on Wells Fargo Securities with respect to the investigations made or procedures followed by Wells Fargo Securities in rendering its opinion.

In connection with rendering its opinion, Wells Fargo Securities performed certain financial, comparative and other analyses as summarized below. This summary is not a complete description of the financial analyses performed and factors considered in connection with such opinion. In arriving at its opinion, Wells Fargo Securities did not ascribe a specific value to Company common stock but rather made its determinations as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the common merger consideration on the basis of various financial and comparative analyses taken as a whole. The preparation of a financial opinion is a complex process and involves various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial and comparative analyses and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. Therefore, a financial opinion is not readily susceptible to summary description.

In arriving at its opinion, Wells Fargo Securities did not attribute any particular weight to any single analysis or factor considered but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor relative to all other analyses and factors performed and considered and in the context of the circumstances of this particular transaction. Accordingly, the analyses must be considered as a whole, as considering any portion of such analyses and factors, without considering all analyses and factors as a whole, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying such opinion. The fact that any specific analysis has been referred to in the summary below is not meant to indicate that such analysis was given greater weight than any other analysis referred to in the summary. No company or transaction is identical to the Company or the merger and an evaluation of Wells Fargo Securities’ analyses is not entirely mathematical; rather, such analyses involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the public trading or other values of the companies reviewed.

In performing its analyses, Wells Fargo Securities considered industry performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters existing as of the date of its opinion, many of which are beyond the control of the Company or any other parties to the merger. None of the Company, Wells Fargo Securities or any other person assumes responsibility if future results are different from those discussed whether or not any such difference is material. Any estimates contained in these analyses and the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than as set forth below. In addition, analyses relating to the value of properties, businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which properties, businesses or securities may actually be sold or acquired. Accordingly, the assumptions and estimates used in, and the results derived from, the following analyses are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.

The following is a summary of the material financial analyses provided on May 28, 2013 to the Company’s board of directors by Wells Fargo Securities in connection with its opinion. Certain financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand the financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary, as the tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data in the tables below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of such financial analyses.     

Net Asset Value Analysis . Wells Fargo Securities performed a net asset value analysis of the Company as of March 31, 2013 based on the Company’s public filings and internal estimates of the Company’s management. Estimated financial data for the Company utilized in such analysis gave effect to certain items or events occurring during the second quarter of 2013, including the issuance by the Company of shares of Company common stock, the repurchase by the Company of shares of its Series A preferred stock, the paydown of amounts under certain of the Company’s outstanding mortgages, the payment by the Company of dividends on Company common stock and Company preferred stock and certain acquisitions consummated by the Company. An estimated net asset value range for the Company’s office, industrial and retail income-producing properties on an asset-by-asset basis was calculated by applying, depending on property type, tenant credit quality and remaining lease term, weighted average capitalization rates for all assets collectively of 7.1% to 7.5% to the calendar year 2013 estimated cash net operating income of such property. Wells Fargo Securities also took into account for purposes of such analysis (i) the estimated net asset value of the Company’s non-stabilized properties and non-real estate assets and other investments as per the Company’s public filings or internal estimates of the Company’s management and (ii) the Company’s cash and liabilities as reflected on its balance sheet as of March 31, 2013 after giving effect to the items or events described above occurring in the second quarter of 2013, including the Company’s outstanding indebtedness (valued, depending upon the type of indebtedness, at the estimated fair value of such debt per the Company’s public filings or mark-to-market utilizing estimated market rates for similar types of indebtedness), re-tenanting costs associated with certain of the Company’s properties as estimated by the Company’s management, accrued dividend payments and preferred stock (valued at its market value as of May 17, 2013) and excluding intangibles and other non-cash GAAP-specific balance sheet items. An implied per share equity value reference range for the Company was then calculated based on the Company’s implied net asset value derived from such analysis divided by the number of fully diluted shares of Company common stock and Company operating partnership Class B units per the Company’s management. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share equity value reference range for Company common stock, as compared to the common merger consideration:

Selected Publicly Traded Companies Analysis . Wells Fargo Securities reviewed and compared financial and operating data relating to the Company and the following three selected publicly traded net lease REITs that Wells Fargo Securities deemed generally relevant for comparative purposes taking into account, among other things, real estate portfolio and financial and operational characteristics, referred to as the primary selected companies:

●      Select Income REIT

●      Lexington Realty Trust

●      Spirit Realty Capital, Inc.

Wells Fargo Securities reviewed closing stock prices of the primary selected companies on May 24, 2013 as multiples of calendar years 2013 and 2014 estimated funds from operations, referred to as FFO per share, and FFO as adjusted for certain items, including primarily straight-line rent revenues, recurring capital expenditures, above market and below market lease amortization and non-cash employee compensation, referred to as AFFO per share. The overall low to high calendar year 2013 estimated FFO per share and AFFO per share multiples observed for the primary selected companies were 9.3x to 15.5x (with a mean multiple of 12.4x) and 10.7x to 16.0x (with a mean multiple of 13.8x), respectively, and overall low to high calendar year 2014 estimated FFO per share and AFFO per share multiples observed for the primary selected companies were 9.0x to 14.7x (with a mean multiple of 11.8x) and 10.1x to 14.4x (with a mean multiple of 12.9x), respectively.

For informational purposes, Wells Fargo Securities also reviewed financial and operating data relating to the following five selected publicly traded net lease REITs, referred to as the secondary selected companies:

●      ARCP

●      EPR Properties

●      National Retail Properties, Inc.

●      WP Carey Inc.

●      Realty Income Corporation

The overall observed low to high calendar year 2013 estimated FFO per share and AFFO per share multiples for the secondary selected companies were 14.3x to 21.2x (with a mean multiple of 19.0x) and 15.0x to 21.2x (with a mean multiple of 18.5x), respectively, and overall observed calendar year 2014 estimated FFO per share and AFFO per share multiples for the secondary selected companies were 13.5x to 20.5x (with a mean multiple of 17.6x) and 14.1x to 20.1x (with a mean multiple of 17.1x), respectively.

Wells Fargo Securities then applied selected ranges of calendar year 2013 estimated FFO per share and AFFO per share multiples of 11.5x to 13.5x and 12.5x to 14.5x, respectively, and selected ranges of calendar year 2014 estimated FFO per share and AFFO per share multiples of 11.0x to 13.0x and 12.0x to 14.0x, respectively, derived from the primary selected companies to corresponding data of the Company. Estimated financial data of the primary selected companies and the secondary selected companies were based on publicly available research analysts’ estimates, public filings and other publicly available information. Estimated financial data of the Company were based on Wall Street consensus estimates. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share equity value reference ranges for the Company, as compared to the common merger consideration:

Dividend Discount Analysis. Wells Fargo Securities performed a dividend discount analysis of the Company to calculate a range of implied present values of the distributable cash flows that the Company was forecasted to generate during the six months ending December 31, 2013 through the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2015 utilizing internal estimates of the Company’s management. Wells Fargo Securities then derived implied terminal values by applying to the Company’s estimated forward-year FFO for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 a range of terminal FFO multiples of 11.0x to 13.0x. Present values (as of March 31, 2013) of distributable cash flows and terminal values were then calculated by Wells Fargo Securities using a discount rate range of 8.5% to 9.5%, based on a cost of equity calculation. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share equity value reference range for the Company, as compared to the common merger consideration:

Other Information. Wells Fargo Securities observed certain additional factors that were not considered part of Wells Fargo Securities’ financial analyses with respect to its opinion but were noted and discussed with the Company’s board of directors for informational purposes, including the following:

●      historical trading performance of Company common stock during the 52-week period ended May 24, 2013, which reflected low and high trading prices for Company common stock during such period of approximately $3.85 to $7.74 per share; and

●      purchase prices paid as multiples of latest 12 months FFO per share and AFFO per share in the following four selected precedent transactions involving net lease REITs announced from February 21, 2012 to January 22, 2013, noting that sufficient reliable financial data generally were not publicly available with respect to the target companies involved in such transactions given, among other things, that such target companies were either recently formed or had no or limited research analyst coverage: (i) Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc. and Spirit Realty Capital, (ii) American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. and American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., (iii) Realty Income Corp. and American Realty Capital Trust Inc. and (iv) W.P. Carey & Co. LLC and Corporate Property Associates 15 Incorporated, which indicated ranges of implied latest 12 months normalized (to adjust for non-recurring items) FFO per share and AFFO per share multiples of 13.9x to 16.5x and 12.3x to 16.5x, respectively, as compared to the latest 12 months (as of March 31, 2013) normalized FFO per share and AFFO per share multiples implied for the Company based on the common merger consideration of 13.7x and 15.5x, respectively.

Miscellaneous

Wells Fargo Securities is the trade name for certain capital markets and investment banking services of Wells Fargo & Company and its subsidiaries, including Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. Wells Fargo Securities is an internationally recognized investment banking firm which is regularly engaged in providing financial advisory services in connection with mergers and acquisitions. The Company selected Wells Fargo Securities to act as its financial advisor because of its qualifications, reputation and experience and its familiarity with the Company and its business. The issuance of Wells Fargo Securities’ opinion was approved by an authorized committee of Wells Fargo Securities.

In connection with its engagement, the Company has agreed to pay Wells Fargo Securities an aggregate fee of $9.0 million, $1.0 million of which was payable upon delivery of its opinion and $8.0 million of which is contingent upon consummation of the merger. The Company also has agreed to pay Wells Fargo Securities an additional fee in the event that the consideration payable in respect of Company common stock exceeds $8.50 per share in connection with any transaction resulting from the go shop process or otherwise, subject to a maximum aggregate fee (inclusive of such additional fee) payable to Wells Fargo Securities of $12.56 million. The Company also has agreed to reimburse certain of Wells Fargo Securities’ expenses, including fees and disbursements of Wells Fargo Securities’ counsel, and to indemnify Wells Fargo Securities and certain related parties against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the U.S. federal securities laws, that may arise out of Wells Fargo Securities’ engagement. Wells Fargo Securities and its affiliates provide a full range of investment banking and financial advisory, securities trading, brokerage and lending services in the ordinary course of business, for which Wells Fargo Securities and such affiliates receive customary fees. In connection with unrelated matters, Wells Fargo Securities and its affiliates in the past have provided, currently are providing and in the future may provide commercial, corporate and investment banking services to the Company, ARCP and certain of their respective affiliates, for which Wells Fargo Securities and its affiliates have received and expect to receive fees, including having acted or acting (i) as administrative agent, lead arranger and/or lender under certain credit facilities, mortgage financings or other lending arrangements of each of the Company and ARCP or their respective affiliates and (ii) as sole or joint bookrunning manager for certain equity offerings of the Company. For the period beginning January 1, 2011 through the first quarter of 2013, the corporate banking and investment banking divisions of Wells Fargo Securities and its affiliates received or are entitled to receive aggregate fees of less than $11 million from ARCP and of less than $5 million from the Company for certain services unrelated to the merger. In the ordinary course of business, Wells Fargo Securities and its affiliates may actively trade, hold or otherwise effect transactions in the securities or financial instruments (including bank loans or other obligations) of the Company, ARCP and their respective affiliates for Wells Fargo Securities’ and its affiliates’ own account and for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities or financial instruments.

Opinion of Houlihan Lokey

On May 28, 2013, Houlihan Lokey rendered its oral opinion to the Company’s board of directors (which was confirmed in writing by delivery of Houlihan Lokey’s written opinion dated May 28, 2013), as to, as of May 28, 2013, the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Company common stock (other than ARCP and its affiliates) of the common merger consideration to be received by the holders of Company common stock (other than ARCP and its affiliates) in the merger pursuant to the merger agreement.

Houlihan Lokey’s opinion was directed to the Company’s board of directors (in its capacity as such) and only addressed the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Company common stock (other than ARCP and its affiliates) of the common merger consideration to be received by the holders of Company common stock (other than ARCP and its affiliates) in the merger pursuant to the merger agreement and does not address any other aspect or implication of the merger, the merger agreement or the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The summary of Houlihan Lokey’s opinion in this document is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of its written opinion, which is attached as Annex C to this document and sets forth the procedures followed, assumptions made, qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken and other matters considered by Houlihan Lokey in preparing its opinion. However, neither Houlihan Lokey’s opinion nor the summary of its opinion and the related analyses set forth in this document are intended to be, and do not constitute advice or a recommendation to the Company’s board of directors or any holder of Company common stock as to how to act or vote with respect to the merger or the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

For purposes of its analysis and opinion, Houlihan Lokey was advised and , at the Company’s board of directors’ direction, assumed that , pursuant to the limited partnership agreement of the Company operating partnership, the company may not engage in the mergers, unless each Company operating partnership Class B equity ownership unit is converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the common merger consideration. The Company’s board of directors further advised Houlihan Lokey that pursuant to the merger agreement, each Company operating partnership Class B equity ownership unit not owned by the Company will be converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the common merger consideration. Accordingly, for purposes of its analyses and opinion, Houlihan Lokey treated each Company operating partnership Class B equity ownership unit not owned by the Company as if it had been converted into a share of Company common stock on a one-for-one basis.

In arriving at its opinion, Houlihan Lokey, among other things:

●      reviewed a draft, dated May 27, 2013, of the merger agreement, and reviewed the limited partnership agreement of the Company operating partnership;

●      reviewed certain publicly available business and financial information relating to the Company that Houlihan Lokey deemed to be relevant;

●      reviewed certain information relating to the historical, current and future operations, financial condition and prospects of the Company made available to Houlihan Lokey by the Company, including financial projections (and adjustments thereto) prepared by the Company’s management relating to the Company for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2018;

●      spoke with certain members of the Company’s management and certain of the Company’s representatives and advisors regarding the business, operations, financial condition and prospects of the Company, the mergers, and related matters;

●      compared the financial and operating performance of the Company with that of other public companies that Houlihan Lokey deemed to be relevant;

●      reviewed the current and historical market prices and trading volume for certain of the Company’s publicly traded securities, and the current and historical market prices and trading volume of the publicly traded securities of certain other companies that Houlihan Lokey deemed to be relevant; and

●      conducted such other financial studies, analyses and inquiries and considered such other information and factors as Houlihan Lokey deemed appropriate.

Houlihan Lokey relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all data, material and other information furnished, or otherwise made available, to it, discussed with or reviewed by it, or publicly available, and did not assume any responsibility with respect to such data, material and other information. In addition, the Company’s management has advised Houlihan Lokey, and Houlihan Lokey assumed, that the financial projections (and adjustments thereto) reviewed by Houlihan Lokey, which have been summarized by the Company in “The Mergers—Certain Prospective Financial Information” on page 37, were reasonably prepared in good faith on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the Company’s management as to the future financial results and condition of the Company and Houlihan Lokey expressed no opinion with respect to such projections or the assumptions on which they were based. Houlihan Lokey relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that there had been no change of the business, assets, liabilities, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects of the Company since the respective dates of the most recent financial statements and other information, financial or otherwise, provided to Houlihan Lokey that would have been material to its analyses or opinion and that there was no information or any facts that would have made any of the information reviewed by Houlihan Lokey incomplete or misleading.

Houlihan Lokey relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (a) the representations and warranties of all parties to the merger agreement and all other related documents and instruments that are referred to therein were true and correct, (b) each party to the merger agreement and such other related documents and instruments including, without limitation, the limited partnership agreement of the Company operating partnership, would fully and timely perform all of the covenants and agreements required to be performed by such party, (c) all conditions to the consummation of the mergers would be satisfied without waiver thereof and (d) the mergers would be consummated in a timely manner in accordance with the terms described in the merger agreement and such other related documents and instruments, without any amendments or modifications thereto. Houlihan Lokey relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that (i) the mergers would be consummated in a manner that complies in all respects with all applicable federal and state statutes, rules and regulations and (ii) all governmental, regulatory and other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the mergers would be obtained and that no delay, limitations, restrictions or conditions would be imposed or amendments, modifications or waivers made that would have an effect on the mergers or the Company that would be material to Houlihan Lokey’s analyses or opinion. In addition, Houlihan Lokey relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, that the final form of the merger agreement would not differ in any respect from the draft of the merger agreement identified above.

Furthermore, in connection with its opinion, Houlihan Lokey was not requested to, and did not, make any physical inspection or independent appraisal or evaluation of any of the assets, properties or liabilities (fixed, contingent, derivative, off-balance-sheet or otherwise) of the Company, the Company operating partnership, ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership or any other party, nor was Houlihan Lokey provided with any such appraisal or evaluation. Houlihan Lokey did not estimate, and expressed no opinion regarding, the liquidation value of any entity or business. Houlihan Lokey undertook no independent analysis of any potential or actual litigation, regulatory action, possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities, to which the Company or the Company operating partnership was or may have been a party or was or may have been subject, or of any governmental investigation of any possible unasserted claims or other contingent liabilities to which the Company or the Company operating partnership was or may have been a party or was or may have been subject.

Houlihan Lokey was not requested to, and did not, (a) initiate or participate in any discussions or negotiations with, or solicit any indications of interest from, third parties with respect to the mergers, the securities, assets, businesses or operations of the Company, the Company operating partnership, ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership or any other party, or any alternatives to the mergers, (b) negotiate the terms of the mergers or (c) advise the Company’s board of directors or any other party with respect to alternatives to the mergers. Houlihan Lokey’s opinion was necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to Houlihan Lokey as of, the date of its opinion. Houlihan Lokey did not undertake, and is under no obligation, to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw its opinion, or otherwise comment on or consider events occurring or coming to its attention after the date of its opinion. Houlihan Lokey expressed no opinion as to what the price or range of prices at which the shares of Company common stock or Company operating partnership Class B units may be purchased or sold, or otherwise be transferable, at any time.

Houlihan Lokey’s opinion was furnished for the use of the Company’s board of directors (in its capacity as such) in connection with its evaluation of the merger, and may not be used for any other purpose without Houlihan Lokey’s prior written consent. Houlihan Lokey’s opinion should not be construed as creating any fiduciary duty on Houlihan Lokey’s part to any party. The opinion is not intended to be, and does not constitute, a recommendation to the Company’s board of directors, any security holder or any other party as to how to act or vote with respect to any matter relating to the merger or otherwise.

Houlihan Lokey’s opinion only addressed whether the common merger consideration to be received by the holders of Company common stock (other than ARCP and its affiliates) in the merger pursuant to the merger agreement was fair to the holders of Company common stock (other than ARCP and its affiliates) from a financial point of view, and, other than assuming the consummation of the partnership merger, did not address any other aspect or implication of the mergers or any agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in connection therewith or otherwise. Houlihan Lokey was not requested to opine as to, and its opinion did not express an opinion as to or otherwise address, among other things: (i) the underlying business decision of the Company’s board of directors, the Company, the Company operating partnership, ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership, their respective security holders or any other party to proceed with or effect the mergers, (ii) the terms of any arrangements, understandings, agreements or documents related to, or the form, structure or any other portion or aspect of, the mergers or otherwise (other than the common merger consideration to the extent expressly specified in the opinion), (iii) the fairness of any portion or aspect of the mergers to the holders of any class of Company securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company, the Company operating partnership, ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership or to any other party, except if and only to the extent expressly set forth in the last sentence of its opinion, (iv) the relative merits of the mergers as compared to any alternative business strategies or transactions that might be available to the Company, the Company operating partnership, ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership or any other party, (v) the fairness of any portion or aspect of the mergers to any one class or group of the Company’s or any other party’s security holders or other constituents vis-à-vis any other class or group of the Company’s or such other party’s security holders or other constituents, (vi) whether or not the Company, the Company operating partnership, ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership, their respective security holders or any other party is receiving or paying reasonably equivalent value in the mergers, (vii) the solvency, creditworthiness or fair value of the Company, the Company operating partnership, ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership or any other participant in the mergers, or any of their respective assets, under any applicable laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance or similar matters or (viii) the fairness, financial or otherwise, of the amount, nature or any other aspect of any compensation or consideration payable to or received by any officers, directors or employees of any party to the mergers, any class of such persons or any other party, relative to the common merger consideration or otherwise. Furthermore, no opinion, counsel or interpretation was intended in matters that require legal, regulatory, accounting, insurance, tax or other similar professional advice. Houlihan Lokey assumed that such opinions, counsel or interpretations had been or would be obtained from the appropriate professional sources. Furthermore, Houlihan Lokey relied, with the consent of the Company’s board of directors, on the assessments by the Company’s board of directors, the Company, the Company operating partnership and their respective advisors as to all legal, regulatory, accounting, insurance and tax matters with respect to the Company, the Company operating partnership, ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership, the mergers or otherwise.

In preparing its opinion to the Company’s board of directors, Houlihan Lokey performed a variety of analyses, including those described below. The summary of Houlihan Lokey’s analyses described below is not a complete description of the analyses underlying Houlihan Lokey’s opinion. The preparation of such an opinion is a complex process involving various quantitative and qualitative judgments and determinations with respect to the financial, comparative and other analytical methods employed and the adaptation and application of these methods to the unique facts and circumstances presented. As a consequence, neither Houlihan Lokey’s opinion nor its underlying analyses is readily susceptible to summary description. Houlihan Lokey arrived at its opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any individual analysis, methodology or factor. Accordingly, Houlihan Lokey believes that its analyses and the following summary must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses, methodologies and factors, without considering all analyses, methodologies and factors or the narrative description of the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying Houlihan Lokey’s analyses and opinion.

In performing its analyses, Houlihan Lokey considered general business, economic, industry and market conditions, financial and otherwise, and other matters as they existed on, and could be evaluated as of, the date of its opinion. Houlihan Lokey’s analyses involved judgments and assumptions with regard to industry performance, general business, economic, regulatory, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. No company, transaction or business used in Houlihan Lokey’s analyses for comparative purposes is identical to the Company or the proposed mergers and an evaluation of the results of those analyses is not entirely mathematical. The estimates contained in the financial forecasts prepared by the Company’s management and the implied valuation reference ranges indicated by Houlihan Lokey’s financial analyses are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In addition, such analyses do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold, which may depend on a variety of factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Much of the information used in, and, accordingly, the results of, Houlihan Lokey’s analyses are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.

Houlihan Lokey’s opinion was only one of many factors considered by the Company’s board of directors in evaluating the proposed merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Neither Houlihan Lokey’s opinion nor its analyses were determinative of the common merger consideration or of the views of the Company’s board of directors or the Company’s management with respect to the merger, the merger agreement, the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or the common merger consideration. The type and amount of consideration payable in the merger were determined through negotiation between the Company and ARCP, and the decision to enter into the merger agreement was solely that of the Company’s board of directors.

The following is a summary of the material analyses reviewed by Houlihan Lokey with the Company’s board of directors in connection with the rendering of Houlihan Lokey’s opinion to the Company’s board of directors on May 28, 2013. The order of the analyses does not represent relative importance or weight given to those analyses by Houlihan Lokey. The analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the analyses. Considering the data in the tables below without considering the full narrative description of the analyses, as well as the methodologies underlying, and the assumptions, qualifications and limitations affecting, each analysis, could create an incomplete view of Houlihan Lokey’s analyses.

For purposes of its analyses, Houlihan Lokey reviewed a number of financial and operating metrics, including:

●      Enterprise Value – generally the value of the relevant company’s outstanding equity securities (taking into account its outstanding warrants and other convertible securities) based on the relevant company’s closing stock price, plus net debt (calculated as outstanding indebtedness, preferred stock and capital lease obligations less the amount of cash on its balance sheet), as of a specified date;

●      Adjusted EBITDA – generally the amount of the relevant company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted for certain non-recurring items for a specified period;

●      Adjusted FFO – generally the amount of the relevant company’s net income (loss) excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property and impairment losses on depreciable real estate, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, comparability and certain non-recurring items for a specified period; and

●      NOI – net operating income.

Selected Companies Analysis . Houlihan Lokey considered certain financial data for the Company and selected companies with publicly traded equity securities that Houlihan Lokey deemed relevant. Unless the context indicates otherwise, enterprise values and equity values derived from the selected companies analysis described below were calculated using the closing price of Company common stock and the common stock of the selected companies listed below as of May 23, 2013. Accordingly, this information may not reflect current or future market conditions. Estimates of Next Fiscal Year of 2013, or NFY, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted FFO and NOI for the Company were based on estimates provided by the Company’s management. Estimates of NFY and Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted FFO and NOI for the selected companies listed below were based on publicly available consensus research analyst estimates for the selected companies.

The financial data reviewed included:

●      Enterprise value as a multiple of estimated latest twelve months, or LTM, Adjusted EBITDA;

●      Enterprise value as a multiple of estimated NFY Adjusted EBITDA;

●      Estimated LTM NOI as a percentage of enterprise value;

●      Equity value as a multiple of estimated LTM Adjusted FFO; and

●      Equity value as a multiple of estimated NFY Adjusted FFO.

The selected companies and resulting data were:

●      Realty Income Corporation

●      Spirit Realty Capital Inc.

●      National Retail Properties, Inc.

●      Agree Realty Corporation

●      Excel Trust, Inc.

●      Lexington Realty Trust

●      Winthrop Realty Trust

●      American Realty Capital Properties Inc.

●      W. P. Carey Inc.

Taking into account the results of the selected companies analysis, Houlihan Lokey applied multiple ranges of 16.5x to 17.5x LTM adjusted EBITDA, 15.5x to 16.5x NFY Adjusted EBITDA, 6.50% to 6.00% LTM NOI, 15.0x to 17.0x LTM adjusted FFO and 14.0x to 16.0x NFY adjusted FFO to corresponding financial data for the Company. The selected companies analysis indicated implied per share value reference ranges of $6.66 to $7.95 based on the selected range of LTM adjusted EBITDA multiples, $7.02 to $8.42 based on the selected range of NFY Adjusted EBITDA multiples, $6.47 to $8.23 based on the selected range of LTM NOI, $7.18 to $8.14 based on the selected range of LTM adjusted FFO multiples and $7.39 to $8.44 based on the selected range of NFY adjusted FFO multiples, respectively, as compared to the common merger consideration of $8.50 per share of company common stock.

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis . Houlihan Lokey performed a discounted cash flow analysis of the Company by calculating the estimated net present value of the unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that the Company was forecasted to generate through December 31, 2018 based on the standalone financial projections provided by the Company’s management. Houlihan Lokey then applied a range of terminal value EBITDA multiples of 16.0x to 17.0x to the Company’s fiscal year 2018 estimated EBITDA. The present values of the Company’s projected future cash flows and terminal value were then calculated using discount rates ranging from 8.0% to 9.0% taking into account Houlihan Lokey’s estimates of the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. For purposes of the discounted cash flow analysis, Houlihan Lokey treated projected future stock based compensation as a cash expense. The discounted cash flow analysis indicated the following implied per share reference range of $5.47 to $8.11, as compared to the proposed common merger consideration of $8.50 per share of company common stock.

Other Considerations . Houlihan Lokey also noted the Enterprise Value as a multiple of LTM Adjusted EBITDA of approximately 17.4x implied by the transaction information publicly disclosed in connection with the recently announced merger involving Cole Credit Property Trust II, Inc.

Other Matters . Houlihan Lokey was engaged by the Company to provide an opinion to the Company’s board of directors (in its capacity as such) regarding the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of Company common stock (other than ARCP and its affiliates) of the common merger consideration to be received by the holders of Company common stock (other than ARCP and its affiliates) in the merger pursuant to the merger agreement. The Company engaged Houlihan Lokey based on Houlihan Lokey’s experience and reputation. Houlihan Lokey is regularly engaged to render financial opinions in connection with mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, leveraged buyouts, recapitalizations and for other purposes. Houlihan Lokey is entitled to a fee of $425,000 for its services, a portion of which became payable upon the execution of Houlihan Lokey’s engagement letter and the balance of which became payable upon the delivery of Houlihan Lokey’s opinion, regardless of the conclusion reached therein. No portion of Houlihan Lokey’s fee is contingent upon the successful completion of the mergers. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Houlihan Lokey for certain expenses and to indemnify Houlihan Lokey, its affiliates and certain related parties against certain potential liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities under the federal securities laws arising out of or relating to Houlihan Lokey’s engagement.

In the ordinary course of business, certain of Houlihan Lokey’s employees and affiliates, as well as investment funds in which they may have financial interests or with which they may co-invest, may acquire, hold or sell, long or short positions, or trade, in debt, equity and other securities and financial instruments (including loans and other obligations) of, or investments in, the Company, ARCP, or any other party that may be involved in the mergers and their respective affiliates or any currency or commodity that may be involved in the mergers. Houlihan Lokey and certain of its affiliates may have in the past provided, may currently be providing and may in the future provide, investment banking, financial advisory and other financial services to the Company, ARCP, other participants in the mergers or certain groups or entities affiliated or associated therewith (including, without limitation, formal and informal committees or groups of creditors) for which Houlihan Lokey and such affiliates have received and may receive compensation.

Convertible Notes and Trust Preferred Securities Redemption

The Company has agreed to, among other things, (i) u se its commercially reasonable efforts to redeem all outstanding convertible notes and trust preferred securities pursuant to the terms of their respective indentures, (ii) timely deliver notices and take all actions necessary in connection with the redemptions and as may be required by the mergers and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and (iii) take all actions required to be taken by the indentures to cause the indentures to terminate. The Company is not required to effect such redemptions prior to the effective time of the merger and unless ARCP provides funds to the Company in an amount sufficient to satisfy the respective redemption. The parties agreed that the completion of such redemptions are not conditions precedent to the completion of the mergers. The parties have agreed that should the Company be unable to effect the redemptions, the parties will negotiate in good faith to cause the surviving entity to assume the applicable obligations in accordance with each respective indenture.

Financing

The merger agreement does not contain a financing condition to the completion of the mergers. ARCP has represented in the merger agreement that it will have sufficient financing available to complete the mergers and other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement at the effective time of the merger.  ARCP has informed us that it intends to fund the cash consideration payable under the merger agreement using a combination of the following resources:

●     ARCP’s available cash on hand;

●     A portion of the $896.0 million in net proceeds from the sale of shares of ARCP common stock and convertible preferred stock in separate, previously disclosed private placement transactions, which transactions were completed on June 7, 2013;

●     A portion of the $289.2 million in net proceeds (or $318.2 if the underwriters exercise their overallotment option in full) from the sale of ARCP’s 3.00% convertible senior notes due 2018, which issuance closed on July 29, 2013. On July 29, 2013, the underwriters delivered notice to ARCP electing to partially exercise their overallotment option to purchase $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of such convertible senior notes, which is expected to close on or about August 1, 2013;

●     An expected issuance of approximately $500 million of ARCP common stock;

●     Approximately $400.0 million of financing under ARCP’s credit facility.  ARCP has commitments on its unsecured credit facility (including revolving and term loans) for total borrowings of $1.45 billion with an "accordion" feature of up to $2.5 billion, subject to borrowing base availability, among other conditions; and

●     Additional alternative financing arrangements, as needed, from the issuance of additional ARCP common stock, preferred securities or other debt, equity or equity-linked financings.

The commitments under ARCP’s credit facility are subject to customary conditions for these types of financings, including (a) the bring-down of ARCP’s representations and warranties, (b) no default existing, (c) timely notice by ARCP and (d) borrowing base availability. If additional commitments are obtained in connection with ARCP’s exercise of the “accordion” feature under the credit facility, such commitments likely will be subject to customary conditions, which may include, without limitation, (1) the completion of due diligence review of the assets, liabilities and properties of ARCP and its subsidiaries, (2) the absence of any change, occurrence or development that has had, or could reasonably be expected to result in, (x) a material adverse change in, or a material adverse effect on, the operations, business, assets, properties or liabilities of ARCP and its subsidiaries, or (y) a material impairment of the rights and remedies of the credit facility lenders and agents under the credit agreement for the credit facility and (3) the absence of any material adverse change or material disruption in the loan syndication, financial, banking or capital markets that has impaired or could reasonably be expected to impair the syndication of the credit facility.

Although the merger agreement does not contain a financing condition to the completion of the mergers, there can be no assurance that ARCP will receive the fundings under the credit facility described above, that ARCP will be successful in obtaining alternative financing from subsequent issuances of ARCP common stock, preferred securities or other debt, equity or equity-linked financing arrangements, or that ARCP will finance the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement as anticipated to fund all or a portion of the cash consideration and other costs of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. In that event, ARCP would have to fund the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement by other means.

Interests of the Company’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger

In considering the recommendations of the Company’s board of directors to approve the merger proposal, the non-binding compensation proposal and the adjournment proposal, the Company’s stockholders should be aware that the executive officers and directors of the Company have certain interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of the Company’s stockholders generally. These interests may create potential conflicts of interest. The Company’s board of directions was aware of those interests and considered them, among other matters, in reaching its decision to approve the merger, the merger agreement and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. These interests include the following:

Treatment of Company Restricted Stock

Under the merger agreement, immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, each then-outstanding share of Company restricted stock granted under the Company’s equity compensation plans, including those granted to the Company’s executive officers and non-employee directors, will vest and become free of restrictions. Each such share of Company restricted stock, reduced by the number of shares of Company common stock that is cancelled and surrendered to the Company in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations, will be converted into the right to receive the common merger consideration.

Treatment of Company Performance Shares

On March 24, 2013, the Company granted performance shares to each executive officer other than Mr. Pollert pursuant to the Company’s equity compensation plan. The performance share awards provided that they would be earned and become vested based on the Company’s total stockholder return relative to the total stockholder return of a peer group of companies, in each case measured over calendar years 2013 through 2015. The executive officers could earn a threshold, target or maximum number of performance shares, depending on the performance goals that are achieved.

Under the merger agreement, the Company’s executive officers will vest in the target number of performance shares upon completion of the merger. Each performance share that is earned will be settled by the issuance of one share of Company common stock. Each such share of Company common stock, reduced by the number of shares of Company common stock that is cancelled and surrendered to the Company in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations, will be converted at the effective time of the merger into the right to receive the common merger consideration.

The agreements evidencing the performance share awards also provide for the payment of dividend equivalents. The dividend equivalents represent the right of a holder of a performance share to receive a cash payment equal to the dividends paid on one share of Company common stock beginning on the date of grant of the performance share and ending on the date each performance share is earned and becomes vested. Under the merger agreement, the Company will pay each executive officer a single cash payment in settlement of the dividend equivalents payable for the target number of performance shares. The payment will equal the amount of dividends paid on an equal number of shares of Company common stock during the period beginning on the date the performance shares were granted and the closing date of the merger.

None of the Company’s non-employee directors holds any performance shares.

The following tables set forth the merger consideration and dividend equivalent payments that will be received by the Company’s executive officers and non-employee directors in respect of their restricted stock and performance share awards upon completion of the merger.

(1)     Represents 108,230 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2014; 54,744 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2015; and 12,117 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2016; in each case subject to continued employment on the vesting date or the attainment of performance goals and continued employment on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(2)     Represents 36,350 “target” performance shares scheduled to vest on December 31, 2015, subject to achievement of total shareholder return goals and continued employment on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(3)     Represents accumulated dividend equivalents on the “target” performance shares. The amount assumes continued payment of cash dividends on Company common stock at an annual rate of $0.31 per share through the closing date of the merger and a merger closing date of September 30, 2013. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(4)     Represents 107,380 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2014; 53,894 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2015; and 11,267 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2016; in each case subject to continued employment on the vesting date or the attainment of performance goals and continued employment on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(5)       Represents 33,800 “target” performance shares scheduled to vest on December 31, 2015, subject to achievement of total shareholder return goals and continued employment on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(6)     Represents accumulated dividend equivalents on the “target” performance shares. The amount assumes continued payment of cash dividends on Company common stock at an annual rate of $0.31 per share through the closing date of the merger and a merger closing date of September 30, 2013.  The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(7)     Represents 83,674 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2014; 44,040 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2015; and 12,400 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2016; in each case subject to continued employment on the vesting date or the attainment of performance goals and continued employment on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(8)     Represents 102,366 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2014; 51,647 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2015; and 11,134 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2016; in each case subject to continued employment on the vesting date or the attainment of performance goals and continued employment on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(9)     Represents 33,400 “target” performance shares scheduled to vest on December 31, 2015, subject to achievement of total shareholder return goals and continued employment on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(10)     Represents accumulated dividend equivalents on the “target” performance shares. The amount assumes continued payment of cash dividends on Company common stock at an annual rate of $0.31 per share through the closing date of the merger and a merger closing date of September 30, 2013.  The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(11)     Represents 61,705 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2014; 32,110 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2015; and 8,450 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2016; in each case subject to continued employment on the vesting date or the attainment of performance goals and continued employment on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(12)     Represents 25,350 “target” performance shares scheduled to vest on December 31, 2015, subject to achievement of total shareholder return goals and continued employment on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(13)     Represents accumulated dividend equivalents on the “target” performance shares. The amount assumes continued payment of cash dividends on Company common stock at an annual rate of $0.31 per share through the closing date of the merger and a merger closing date of September 30, 2013.  The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(1)     Represents 7,433 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2014; 5,533 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2015; and 2,834 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2016; in each case subject to continued service as a director on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(2)     Represents 8,300 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2014; 6,033 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2015; and 2,834 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2016; in each case subject to continued service as a director on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(3)     Represents 7,433 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2014; 5,533 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2015; and 2,834 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2016; in each case subject to continued service as a director on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

(4)     Represents 7,433 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2014; 5,533 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2015; and 2,834 shares of restricted stock scheduled to vest on March 24, 2016; in each case subject to continued service as a director on the vesting date. The amount shown is prior to reduction for tax withholding.

Section 16 Matters

Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Company has agreed to take all steps as may be required to cause to be exempt under Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act any dispositions of shares of Company common stock (including derivative securities with respect to such shares) that are treated as dispositions under Rule 16b-3 and result from the transactions contemplated under the merger agreement by each officer or director of the Company who is or will be subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act with respect to the Company.

Indemnification and Insurance

Subject to certain limitations, the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ directors and officers are entitled to continued indemnification, advancement of expenses and insurance coverage under the merger agreement for a period of six years after the merger is completed. For a more complete description, please see “The Merger Agreement—Covenants and Agreements—Indemnification of Directors and Officers; Insurance” beginning on page 77 .

The Company’s board of directors was aware of the interests described in this section and in the section “Change of Control and Termination Benefits” below, and considered them, among other matters, in approving the merger agreement and making its recommendation that the Company’s stockholders approve the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. See “The Mergers—Reasons for the Mergers” on page 34 and “The Mergers—Recommendation of the Company’s Board of Directors” on page 37 .

Change of Control and Termination Benefits

Employment Agreements

The Company has entered into employment agreements with each of Messrs. McDowell, Seale, Pollert, Blanz and Hughes, which we refer to collectively as the employment agreements. The employment agreements with Messrs. McDowell, Seale, Pollert and Blanz were entered into in 2004. In 2007, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Hughes and amended the employment agreement with Mr. Blanz.

Each employment agreement provides that upon a termination of employment, for any reason, the executive is entitled to receive any accrued but unpaid compensation and benefits through the date of termination. Each employment agreement also provides for the payment of additional compensation, contingent upon the effectiveness of the executive’s release of all claims for the benefit of the Company and its affiliates. The amount of the additional compensation depends on the circumstances of the executive’s termination, as described below:

Nonrenewal. If the Company elects not to renew the term of an employment agreement, the executive will be entitled to receive his base salary for the remainder of the term plus a lump sum payment equal to his current annual base salary.

Death or Disability. If the executive’s employment ends on account of death or disability, he (or his estate) will be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to his highest annual bonus for the prior three calendar years, pro-rated for the period of the executive’s service during the final calendar year of employment. In addition, outstanding equity awards granted under the Company’s equity compensation plans will be governed by the applicable award agreements.

Without Cause or with Good Reason. If the executive’s employment is terminated without cause (as defined below) or the executive resigns with good reason (as defined below) (other than in connection with his death or disability or non-renewal of the employment agreement), the executive will be entitled to receive the following severance benefits:

●      A lump sum payment equal to three times (in the case of Messrs. McDowell, Seale and Blanz) or two times (in the case of Messrs. Pollert and Hughes) the executive’s current annual base salary;

●      A lump sum payment equal to three times (in the case of Messrs. McDowell, Seale and Blanz) or two times (in the case of Messrs. Pollert and Hughes) the executive’s average annual bonus of the past three years;

●      A lump sum payment equal to the executive’s highest bonus for the prior three calendar years, pro-rated for the period of the executive’s service during the final calendar year of employment;

●      Continuation of the executive’s life, health and disability coverage for a period of twenty-four months or a cash payment, equal to the Company’s monthly premium, for each month that such coverage cannot be provided.

●      Outstanding equity awards granted under the Company’s equity compensation plans, including Company restricted stock and performance shares, will be governed by the applicable award agreements.

Each employment agreement also provides that the Company will indemnify the executive for any liability that the executive incurs for the parachute payment excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, which we refer to as the parachute indemnity, on account of the executive’s receipt of the severance benefits or any other “parachute payments” (under Section 280G of the Code).

The employment agreements generally define “cause” as (i) the executive’s conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony, (ii) the executive’s intentional failure to substantially perform reasonably assigned material duties, (iii) the executive’s willful misconduct in the performance of the executive’s duties or (iv) the executive’s material breach of any non-competition or non-disclosure agreement with the Company.

The employment agreements define “good reason” as (i) any reduction in the executive’s base salary, (ii) a material reduction in the executive’s duties, titles and responsibilities, or the assignment to the executive of any duties materially inconsistent with his position with the Company without his consent, (iii) a requirement that the executive relocate outside the New York, New York metropolitan area or (iv) a material breach of the employment agreement by the Company. In addition, with respect to clause (ii) and clause (iv), a resignation will not be with good reason unless the Company fails to cure any such grounds within thirty days after receipt of the notice.

The completion of the merger will constitute a change of control under the employment agreements. It is currently contemplated that at the effective time of the merger, the employment of Messrs. McDowell, Seale, Pollert, Blanz and Hughes will terminate, although as described below, they may become employees of ARCP or one of its affiliates upon completion of the merger. Whether or not they become employees of ARCP or one of its affiliates, it is anticipated that the executives’ termination will be without cause under the employment agreements and that they will become entitled to the severance payments described above and shown in the table under “Quantification of Change of Control and Termination Payments and Benefits of Named Executive Officers.” However, as described below, the executives may not become entitled to receive all of the severance benefits described above or may not be entitled to receive all of the parachute indemnity.

Potential Employment with ARCP

ARCP has informed the Company’s board of directors that it desires to discuss entering into employment agreements with the Company’s executive officers to be effective upon completion of the merger. Concurrently with the execution of the merger agreement, Messrs. McDowell, Seale, Pollert, Blanz and Hughes entered into a letter agreement with ARCP, which we refer to as the letter agreement. The full text of the letter agreement is attached to this document as Annex E and is incorporated in this document by reference.

Under the letter agreement, each executive has agreed to use his good faith efforts to negotiate and enter into (i) an amendment to the executive’s existing employment agreement (to be effective immediately prior to the effective time of the merger) that reduces the severance benefits payable thereunder such that the severance payments and other “parachute payments” will not exceed the amount that can be paid without triggering liability for the parachute payment excise tax (thereby eliminating a requirement for the Company to pay the parachute indemnity) and (ii) a new employment agreement with ARCP or an affiliate of ARCP (effective as of the date following the date on which the effective time of the merger occurs) that provides for the payment of compensation that does not constitute “parachute payments” with regard to the merger and that provides for compensation for services in an amount that exceeds the executive’s current compensation by the amount equal to at least the amount of the reduced severance payments. The letter agreement further provides that if the executive does not enter into the agreements described in the preceding sentence, then the executive’s existing employment agreement will be amended to reduce the parachute indemnity such that the executive will pay one-half of his excise tax liability and the Company will pay the remainder of the excise tax (and indemnify the executive for the Company’s payment of that portion of the excise tax).

Other than as described above, as of the date of this document, none of the Company’s directors or executive officers have entered into any amendments to their existing employment agreements with the Company in connection with the mergers or any new employment agreements with the Company, ARCP or any of ARCP’s affiliates. It is possible that some or all of the Company’s executive officers will enter into employment agreements or similar arrangements with the Company, ARCP or any of ARCP’s affiliates.

Quantification of Change of Control and Termination Payments and Benefits of Named Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the amount of payments and benefits that each named executive officer of the Company would receive in connection with the merger, assuming the merger occurs on September 30, 2013, that completion of the merger constitutes a “change of control” for purposes of the applicable plan or agreement and that the employment of the applicable named executive officer is terminated other than for cause or the named executive officer resigns with good reason, in each case on such date.

The payments and benefits set forth below are the subject of a nonbinding advisory vote of the Company’s stockholders, as described in “Proposal 2: Approval of the Non-Binding Compensation Proposal” on page 23. For additional details regarding the terms of the payments quantified below, see “The Mergers—Change of Control and Termination Benefits—Employment Agreements” on page 55 .

(1)     The named executive officers are entitled to lump sum severance payments upon a termination without cause or a resignation with good reason without regard to whether a change of control has occurred, as described in “The Mergers—Change of Control and Termination Benefits—Employment Agreements” on page 55. The severance payment is equal to (i) a multiple of the named executive officer’s current annual base salary, (ii) a multiple of the named executive officer’s average annual bonus for the past three years and (iii) a pro rata portion of the named executive officer’s highest annual bonus for the prior three calendar years. The severance multiple is three for Messrs. McDowell, Seale and Blanz and the severance multiple for Messrs. Pollert and Hughes is two. Payment of the severance benefit is conditioned upon the named executive officer’s execution (and non-revocation) of a general release of claims against the Company and certain affiliated parties. Generally, the named executive officers are subject to covenants of noncompetition and non-solicitation of Company employees and customers during employment and for one year thereafter, and to perpetual duties of confidentiality. The severance payments disclosed in this column consist of the following components for each named executive officer:

With respect to Messrs. McDowell, Seale and Blanz, the severance payments disclosed in this column assume that such named executive officers do not enter into new employment agreements with ARCP or an affiliate of ARCP. If any such individual enters into a new employment agreement, then, as provided in the letter agreement, the aggregate severance payments to such named executive officer will be reduced to not more than the maximum amount that can be paid without triggering liability for parachute payment excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code. If new employment agreements are entered into, the Company estimates that the reduced cash severance benefit for such named executive officer who enters into such new employment agreement would be $ 1,772,103  for Mr. McDowell; $1,432,854 for Mr. Seale; and $1,166,949 for Mr. Blanz. With respect to Messrs. Pollert and Hughes, it is not anticipated that the severance payments disclosed in this column will vary depending upon whether such named executive officer enters into a new employment agreement with ARCP or an affiliate of ARCP, as the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code will only apply to the Company’s three highest paid executive officers.

(2)     In accordance with the merger agreement, outstanding equity awards held by the Company’s named executive officers will vest on a “single trigger” basis upon completion of the merger. The amounts disclosed in this column reflect the value of the acceleration of unvested shares of Company restricted stock as of the effective time of the merger, the value of the acceleration of Company performance shares that will become fully earned and settled for 100% of the target number of shares of Company common stock under such awards and the payment of dividend equivalents on 100% of the target number of performance shares as of the effective time of the merger. The amounts disclosed in this column consist of the following types of payment for each named executive officer:

(3)     The amounts disclosed in this column represent two times the Company’s annual premium for each named executive officer’s life, disability and health insurance coverage. The perquisites/benefits severance payment portion is payable on a double-trigger basis. The amounts disclosed in this column consist of the following components for each named executive officer:

(4)     With respect to Messrs. McDowell, Seale and Blanz, the amount disclosed in this column reflects the “gross-up amount” (as defined in the employment agreements) for one-half of any excise tax imposed on the named executive officer by Section 4999 of the Code, as provided in the letter agreement described above under “ The Mergers—Change of Control and Termination Benefits— Potential Employment with ARCP” beginning on page 56, based on the assumption that the named executive officer does not enter into a new employment agreement with the ARCP or an affiliate of ARCP. If any such named executive officer enters into a new employment agreement, then the letter agreement provides for a reduction in severance payments so that the aggregate amounts paid will be less than the amount that triggers the excise tax imposed. In that event, no “gross-up” amount would be payable to the named executive officer and the amount disclosed in this column would be $0. With respect to Messrs. McDowell, Seale and Blanz, the amount disclosed in this column does not reflect a potential reduction in the value of the total “parachute payments” (and resulting decrease in tax liability under Section 4999 of the Code and the tax reimbursement) on account of values that may be assigned to the covenant against competition in each such executive’s employment agreement or the amount of any “parachute payment” that is treated as reasonable compensation for services rendered prior to the change of control. With respect to Messrs. Pollert and Hughes, it is anticipated that the “gross up” amount will be zero whether or not they enter into new employment agreements with ARCP or an affiliate of ARCP, as the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code will only apply to the Company’s three highest paid executive officers.

The Company’s board of directors was aware of the interests described in this section and considered them, among other matters, in approving the merger agreement and making its recommendation that the Company’s stockholders approve the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. See “The Mergers—Reasons for the Mergers” on page 34 and “The Mergers—Recommendation of the Company’s Board of Directors” on page 37 .

Regulatory Matters

We are unaware of any material federal, state or foreign regulatory requirements or approvals that are required for the execution of the merger agreement or the completion of either the merger or the partnership merger, other than the filing of the articles of merger with respect to the merger with, and the acceptance of such articles of merger for record by, the SDAT, and the filing of a certificate of merger with respect to the partnership merger by our operating partnership with the Delaware Secretary.

Litigation Relating to the Mergers

The Company, its directors, and its affiliates, the Company operating partnership and the general partner of the Company operating partnership, as well as ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership and Merger Sub, have been named as defendants in a putative class action lawsuit in connection with the proposed merger, styled Mizani v. CapLease, Inc. , No. 651986/2013, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the merger agreement was the product of breaches of fiduciary duty by the Company’s directors because the merger does not provide for full and fair value for the Company’s stockholders, the merger was not the result of a competitive bidding process, the merger agreement contains coercive deal protection measures, and the merger agreement and the merger were approved as a result of improper self-dealing by certain defendants who would receive certain alleged employment compensation benefits and continued employment pursuant to the merger agreement. The complaint also alleges that the Company, ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership and Merger Sub aided and abetted the directors’ alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The plaintiff seeks, among other things, to enjoin completion of the merger. The Company believes that the allegations of the complaint are without merit and that it has substantial meritorious defenses to the claims set forth in the complaint.

Separately, the Company, its directors and its affiliates, the Company operating partnership and the general partner of the Company operating partnership, as well as ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership and Merger Sub, have been named as defendants in a putative class action and derivative lawsuit in connection with the proposed merger, styled Tarver v. CapLease, Inc. , No. 24C13004176, in the Circuit Court of the State of Maryland, Baltimore City. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the merger agreement was the product of breaches of fiduciary duty by the Company’s directors because the merger does not provide for full and fair value for the Company’s stockholders, the merger agreement contains coercive deal protection measures, the merger was not the result of a competitive bidding process, and the merger agreement and the merger were approved as a result of improper self-dealing. The complaint also alleges that the Company, the Company operating partnership, the general partner of the Company operating partnership, ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership and Merger Sub aided and abetted the directors’ alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The plaintiff seeks, among other things, to enjoin completion of the merger. The Company believes that the allegations of the complaint are without merit and that it has substantial meritorious defenses to the claims set forth in the complaint.

Separately, the Company, its directors and its affiliates, the Company operating partnership and the general partner of the Company operating partnership, as well as ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership and Merger Sub, have been named as defendants in a putative class action and derivative lawsuit in connection with the proposed merger, styled Carach v. CapLease, Inc. , No. 651986/2013, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the merger agreement was the product of breaches of fiduciary duty by the Company’s directors because the merger does not provide for full and fair value for the Company’s stockholders, the directors failed to take steps to maximize the value of the Company or properly value the Company, failed to protect against various alleged conflicts of interest, and failed to fully disclose material information concerning the process that led to the Merger. The complaint also alleges that the Company operating partnership, the general partner of the Company operating partnership, ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership and Merger Sub aided and abetted the directors’ alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The plaintiff seeks, among other things, to enjoin completion of the merger. The Company believes that the allegations of the complaint are without merit and that it has substantial meritorious defenses to the claims set forth in the complaint.

Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a summary of the material United States federal income tax consequences of the merger to holders of Company common stock and Series A preferred stock, Series B preferred stock and Series C preferred stock (together, our preferred stock) whose shares are surrendered in the merger in exchange for the right to receive the merger consideration as described below. This summary is based on current law, is for general information only and is not tax advice. This summary is based on the Code, applicable Treasury Regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, each as in effect as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to change or different interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. We have not requested, and do not plan to request, any rulings from the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, concerning our tax treatment or the tax treatment of the merger, and the statements in this proxy are not binding on the IRS or any court. We can provide no assurance that the tax consequences contained in this discussion will not be challenged by the IRS, or if challenged, will be sustained by a court.

This summary assumes that shares of our common and preferred stock are held as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code and does not address all aspects of taxation that may be relevant to particular holders in light of their personal investment or tax circumstances or to persons that are subject to special tax rules and does not address the tax consequences of the merger to holders of share options, restricted shares, stock appreciation rights, performance awards or OP Units. In addition, this summary does not address the tax treatment of special classes of holders of our common or preferred stock, including, for example:

●      banks and other financial institutions;

●      insurance companies;

●      regulated investment companies;

●      real estate investment trusts;

●      tax-exempt entities or persons holding our stock in a tax-deferred or tax advantaged account;

●      mutual funds;

●      subchapter S corporations;

●      dealers in securities or currencies;

●      traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings;

●      persons whose functional currency is not the United States dollar;

●      persons holding our common or preferred stock as part of a hedging or conversion transaction or as part of a “straddle” or a constructive sale;

●      U.S. expatriates;

●      persons subject to the alternative minimum tax;

●      holders who acquired our common or preferred stock through the exercise of employee share options or warrants or otherwise as compensation;

●      holders that are properly classified as a partnership or otherwise as a pass-through entity under the Code;

●      holders that hold 5% or more of any class of our stock; and

●      non-U.S. holders, as defined below, except to the extent discussed below.

This summary also does not discuss any state, local, foreign or other tax considerations.

If any entity that is treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes holds our common or preferred stock, the tax treatment of its partners or members generally will depend upon the status of the partner or member and the activities of the entity. If you are a partner of a partnership or a member of a limited liability company or other entity classified as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes and that entity is holding our common or preferred stock, you should consult your tax advisor. Moreover, each holder should consult its tax advisor regarding the United States federal income tax consequences to it of the merger in light of its own particular situation, as well as any consequences of the merger to such holder arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.

For purposes of this section, a “U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner of our common or preferred stock that is for United States federal income tax purposes one of the following:

●      a citizen or resident of the United States;

●      a corporation, or other entity treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state or political subdivision thereof;

●      a trust (a) the administration of which is subject to the primary supervision of a United States court and which has one or more United States persons who have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (b) has a valid election in place under the Treasury Regulations to be treated as a United States person; or

●      an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source.

As used in this section, a “non-U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner of our common or preferred stock that is an individual, corporation, estate or trust that is not a U.S. holder as described in the bullets above.

Consequences of the Merger to the Company

For United States federal income tax purposes, we will treat the merger as if we had sold all of our assets to Merger Sub in exchange for the merger consideration and then made a liquidating distribution of the merger consideration to our stockholders in exchange for our shares of stock. Because as a REIT we are entitled to receive a deduction for liquidating distributions and we anticipate that our deemed liquidating distribution will exceed our taxable income recognized as a result of the merger, we anticipate that we will not be subject to United States federal income tax on any gain recognized in connection with the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

Consequences of the Merger to U.S. Holders of Our Stock

General . The receipt of cash by U.S. holders in exchange for their stock pursuant to the merger will be a taxable transaction for United States federal income tax purposes (and also may be a taxable transaction under applicable state, local and foreign income and other tax laws). In general, a U.S. holder of our stock will recognize gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between:

Gain or loss will be calculated separately for each block of shares of stock, with a block consisting of shares acquired at the same cost in a single transaction. Assuming that the stock constitutes a capital asset in the hands of the U.S. holder, this gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if at the time of the merger the stock has been held for more than one year. An individual U.S. holder will be subject to tax on net capital gain at a maximum federal income tax rate of 20%. Additionally, a 3.8% Medicare unearned contribution tax will apply to any gain recognized by individuals, trusts and estates whose income exceeds certain threshold levels. Capital gains of corporate U.S. holders generally are taxable at the regular tax rates applicable to corporations. The deductibility of a capital loss recognized in the exchange is subject to limitations under the Code. In addition, the IRS has the authority to prescribe, but has not yet prescribed, regulations that would apply a tax rate of 25% to a portion of capital gain realized by a noncorporate stockholder on the sale of REIT stock that would correspond to the REIT’s “unrecaptured Section 1250 gain.”

Special Rule for U.S. Holders Who Have Held Stock Less than Six Months . A U.S. holder who has held our stock for less than six months at the time of the merger, taking into account the holding period rules of Section 246(c)(3) and (4) of the Code, and who recognizes a loss on the exchange of our stock in the merger, will be treated as recognizing a long-term capital loss to the extent of any capital gain dividends received from us, or such holder’s share of any designated retained capital gains, with respect to such stock.

Consequences of the Merger to Non-U.S. Holders of Our Stock

Generally, a non-U.S. holder’s gain or loss from the merger will be determined in the same manner as that of a U.S. holder. However, the United States federal income tax consequences of the merger to a non-U.S. holder will depend on various factors, including whether the receipt of the merger consideration is treated under provisions added to the Code by the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980, or FIRPTA, as sales of our stock or instead as distributions from us. The IRS announced in Notice 2007-55 that it intends to (1) take the position that under current law a non-U.S. holder’s receipt of a liquidating distribution from a REIT (including the receipt of cash in exchange for Company stock in the merger, which will be treated as a deemed liquidation for federal income tax purposes) is generally subject to tax under FIRPTA as a distribution to the extent attributable to gain from the sale of “United States real property interests,” and (2) issue regulations that will be effective for transactions occurring on or after June 13, 2007, clarifying this treatment. However, legislation effectively overriding Notice 2007-55 has previously been proposed, and it is not possible to say if or when any such legislation will be enacted. As a result, the following paragraphs provide alternative discussions of the tax consequences that would arise to the extent the tax treatment set forth in the Notice does or does not apply. Notwithstanding the discussion in the following paragraphs, we intend to take the position that the cash received in exchange for Company stock will be subject to tax in accordance with Notice 2007-55 as described in more detail below. In general, the provisions governing the taxation of distributions by REITs can be less favorable to non-U.S. holders than the taxation of sales or exchanges of REIT stock by non-U.S. holders, and non-U.S. holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of these provisions.

Distribution of Gain from the Disposition of U.S. Real Property Interests . To the extent the tax treatment set forth in Notice 2007-55 applies, and to the extent cash received by non-U.S. holders in the merger is attributable to gain from the deemed sale of our United States real property interests (which we expect to be a substantial portion of such cash), then such amount would be taxed under FIRPTA, unless a special exception applies (the “5% Exception,” discussed below). If the distribution were taxed under FIRPTA, the gain recognized by a non-U.S. holder generally would be subject to United States federal income tax on a net basis to the extent the distribution is attributable to gain from the sale of our United States real property interests, and a corporate non-U.S. holder could also be subject to the branch profits tax on such FIRPTA gain. In addition, 35% (or 20% to the extent provided in Treasury Regulations) of any such amounts paid to a non ‑ U.S. holder would be withheld and remitted to the IRS. The 5% Exception is applied to shares of stock on a class-by-class basis, and would apply to a non-U.S. holder of our stock so long as (1) the class of our stock is regularly traded on an established securities market located in the United States, and (2) the non-U.S. holder has not owned more than 5% of that class of stock at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of the merger. We believe that the Company common stock, Series A preferred stock, Series B preferred stock and Series C preferred stock are regularly traded on an established securities market in the United States as of the date of this document. If the 5% Exception were to apply to a non-U.S. holder, the FIRPTA tax would not apply, but the amount of withholding to which such non-U.S. holder would be subject is not entirely clear. If the merger consideration were to be treated as a liquidating distribution, then we would be required to withhold at a rate of 10%. If the merger consideration were to be treated as an ordinary dividend, then we would be required to withhold at a rate of 30%. Because of the uncertainty in the law, we intend to withhold at a rate of 30% with respect to non-U.S. holders that qualify for the 5% Exception.

Taxable Sale of Stock . Subject to the discussion of backup withholding and of distribution of gain from the disposition of United States real property interests above, if the merger is treated as a taxable sale of our stock, a non-U.S. holder should not be subject to federal income taxation on any gain or loss from the merger unless: (i) the gain is effectively connected with the non-U.S. holder’s conduct of a trade or business in the United States, or, if an applicable income tax treaty applies, the gain is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the non-U.S. holder in the United States; (ii) the non-U.S. holder is an individual present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the merger and certain other requirements are met; or (iii) such shares of stock constitute a “United States real property interest” under FIRPTA.

A non-U.S. holder whose gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States will generally be subject to United States federal income tax on such gain on a net basis in the same manner as a U.S. holder. In addition, a non-U.S. holder that is a corporation may be subject to the 30% branch profits tax on such effectively connected gain described in clause (i) of the previous paragraph.

A non-U.S. holder who is an individual present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the merger and who meets certain other requirements will be subject to a flat 30% tax on the gain derived from the merger, which may be offset by United States source capital losses. In addition, the non-U.S. holder may be subject to applicable alternative minimum taxes.

If a non-U.S. holder’s stock constitutes a United States real property interest under FIRPTA, such holder will be subject to United States federal income tax on the gain recognized in the merger on a net basis in the same manner as a U.S. holder. A non-U.S. holder’s stock generally will not constitute a U.S. real property interest if (i) we are a “domestically controlled qualified investment entity” at the merger effective time, or (ii) both (a) that class of our stock is regularly traded on an established securities market at the date of the merger and (b) the non-U.S. holder holds 5% or less of the total fair market value of that class of stock at all times during the shorter of (x) the five-year period ending with the effective date of the merger and (y) the non-U.S. holder’s holding period for the stock. As discussed above, we believe that the Company common stock, Series A preferred stock, Series B preferred stock and Series C preferred stock are regularly traded on an established securities market as of the date of this document. A “qualified investment entity” includes a REIT. Assuming we qualify as a REIT, we will be a “domestically controlled qualified investment entity” at the merger effective time if non-U.S. holders held directly or indirectly less than 50% in value of our stock at all times during the five-year period ending with the merger effective time. While we believe that we currently are a domestically controlled REIT, no assurances can be given that the actual ownership of our stock has been or will be sufficient for us to qualify as a “domestically controlled qualified investment entity” at the merger effective time.

In addition, our stock will not constitute a United States real property interest if (i) as of the effective date of the merger, we did not hold any United States real property interests, and (ii) all of the United States real property interests held by us during the five-year period ending with the effective date of the merger were disposed of in transactions in which the full amount of the gain (if any) was recognized. The application of this rule in a transaction such as the merger is not entirely clear. You should consult your tax advisor regarding the possible FIRPTA tax consequences to you of the merger.

Income Tax Treaties . If a non-U.S. holder is eligible for treaty benefits under an income tax treaty with the United States, the non-U.S. holder may be able to reduce or eliminate certain of the United States federal income tax consequences discussed above, such as the branch profits tax. Non-U.S. holders should consult their tax advisor regarding possible relief under an applicable income tax treaty.

U.S. Withholding Tax . As described above, it is unclear whether the receipt of the merger consideration by a non-U.S. holder will be treated as a sale or exchange of our stock or as a distribution from us that is attributable to gain from the deemed sale of our United States real property interests in the merger. Accordingly, we intend to withhold U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 35% from the portion of the merger consideration that is, or is treated as, attributable to gain from the sale of United States real property interests and paid to a non-U.S. holder unless such holder qualifies for the 5% Exception, in which case we intend to apply a U.S. federal income tax withholding rate of 30%, unless reduced by an applicable income tax treaty and the non-U.S. holder provides us with an applicable Form W-8. If a non-U.S. holder holds its stock through a nominee, that nominee may take a contrary position and conclude that withholding applies to the merger consideration payable to such non-U.S. holder.

A non-U.S. holder may be entitled to a refund or credit against the holder’s United States federal income tax liability, if any, with respect to any amount withheld pursuant to FIRPTA, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS on a timely basis. Non-U.S. holders should consult their tax advisor regarding withholding tax considerations.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

Backup withholding, currently at a rate of 28%, and information reporting may apply to the cash received pursuant to the exchange of our stock in the merger. Backup withholding will not apply, however, to a holder who

●      in the case of a U.S. holder, furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies that it is not subject to backup withholding on the substitute IRS Form W-9 or successor form,

●      in the case of a non-U.S. holder, furnishes an applicable IRS Form W-8 or successor form, or

●      is otherwise exempt from backup withholding and complies with other applicable rules and certification requirements.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax and any amount withheld under these rules may be credited against the holder’s United States federal income tax liability and may entitle the holder to a refund if required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

THE FOREGOING DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF THE POTENTIAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE MERGER AND IS NOT TAX ADVICE. THEREFORE, HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK AND PREFERRED STOCK ARE STRONGLY URGED TO CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE MERGER, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT OF UNITED STATES FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX LAWS IN THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.

NOTHING IN THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED TO BE, OR SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS, TAX ADVICE WITH RESPECT TO THE HOLDERS OF EQUITY OWNERSHIP UNITS OF OUR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP. HOLDERS OF EQUITY OWNERSHIP UNITS OF OUR OPERATING PARTNERSHIP SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE PARTNERSHIP MERGER.

Delisting and Deregistration of Company Common Stock and Company Preferred Stock

If the merger is completed, the Company common stock and the Company preferred stock will no longer be traded on the NYSE and will be deregistered under the Exchange Act.

THE MERGER AGREEMENT

This section of this document describes the material provisions of the merger agreement, which is attached as Annex A to this document and is incorporated in this document by reference. This summary may not contain all of the information about the merger agreement that may be important to you. The Company urges you to read the full text of the merger agreement carefully because it is the legal document that governs the mergers. The merger agreement is not intended to provide you with any factual information about the Company or its subsidiaries. In particular, the assertions embodied in the representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement (and summarized below) are qualified by information the Company and ARCP filed with the SEC prior to the date of the merger agreement, as well as by a confidential disclosure letter that the Company delivered to ARCP in connection with the signing of the merger agreement, that modify, qualify and create exceptions to the representations and warranties set forth in the merger agreement. Moreover, some of those representations and warranties may not be accurate or complete as of any specified date, may apply contractual standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material by investors or that is different from standards of materiality generally applicable under the U.S. federal securities laws or may not be intended as statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating risk among the parties to the merger agreement. The representations and warranties and other provisions of the merger agreement and the description of such provisions in this document should not be read alone but instead should be read in conjunction with the other information contained in the reports, statements and filings that each of the Company and ARCP file with the SEC and the other information in this document. See “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 87 for additional information.

The Company acknowledges that, notwithstanding the inclusion of the foregoing cautionary statements, the Company is responsible for considering whether additional specific disclosures of material information regarding material contractual provisions are required to make the statements in this document not misleading.

Form, Effective Time and Closing of the Merger

The merger agreement provides for the merger of the Company with and into Merger Sub, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement. Merger Sub will be the surviving entity in the merger and, following completion of the merger, will continue to exist as a wholly owned subsidiary of ARCP governed by the laws of the State of Delaware. The merger will become effective at the later of the time that articles of merger are accepted for record by the SDAT and a certificate of merger is duly filed with the Delaware Secretary or at a later date and time as shall be agreed to by the Company and ARCP and specified in the articles of merger and certificate of merger (not to exceed 30 days from the date the articles of merger are accepted for record by the SDAT and the certificate of merger is duly filed with the Delaware Secretary).

Following the effective time of the merger, the merger agreement provides for the merger of the Company operating partnership with and into the ARCP operating partnership, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement. The ARCP operating partnership will be the surviving partnership in the partnership merger and, following completion of the partnership merger, will continue to exist as a direct subsidiary of ARCP governed by the laws of the State of Delaware. The partnership merger will become effective at the time a certificate of merger is duly filed with the Delaware Secretary or at a later date and time as shall be agreed to by the Company and ARCP and specified in the certificate of merger (not to exceed 30 days from the date the certificate of merger is duly filed with the Delaware Secretary).

The merger agreement provides that the closing of the mergers will take place on the third business day following the date on which the last of the conditions to closing of the merger (described under “The Merger Agreement—Conditions to Completion of the Merger” on page 79) have been satisfied or waived (other than the conditions that by their terms are to be satisfied at the closing of the mergers, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of those conditions), provided that neither ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership nor Merger Sub are required to complete the mergers until the earlier of (i) the date that is five business days after certain consents of third parties have been obtained and (ii) October 31, 2013. In addition, if certain consents of third parties have not been obtained by October 31, 2013, ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership and Merger Sub will not be required to complete the mergers until December 2, 2013.

Organizational Documents of the Surviving Entities

Upon the completion of the merger, the certificate of formation and limited liability company agreement of Merger Sub in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be the certificate of formation and limited liability company agreement of the surviving entity.

Upon completion of the partnership merger, the certificate of limited partnership and limited partnership agreement of the ARCP operating partnership in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the partnership merger will be the certificate of limited partnership and limited partnership agreement of the surviving partnership.

Merger Consideration; Conversion or Cancellation of Shares in the Merger

Merger Consideration

At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding share of Company common stock (other than shares of Company common stock owned by any wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, ARCP or any subsidiary of ARCP, which shares will be cancelled and retired and receive no payment with respect thereto) will be converted automatically into the right to receive $8.50 in cash, without any interest and less applicable withholding taxes. Each outstanding share of each series of Company preferred stock (other than shares of Company preferred stock owned by any wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, ARCP or any subsidiary of ARCP, which will be cancelled and retired and receive no payment with respect thereto) will be converted automatically into the right to receive an amount of cash equal to the sum of $25.00 plus all accrued and unpaid dividends on such share of Company preferred stock to, but excluding, the closing date, without any interest and less applicable withholding taxes.

At the effective time of the partnership merger, each outstanding equity ownership unit of the Company operating partnership (other than any units owned by the surviving entity or any of its subsidiaries) will be converted into the right to receive $8.50 in cash, without any interest and less applicable withholding taxes.

Payment of Merger Consideration for Company Common Stock, Company Preferred Stock and Company Operating Partnership Units

The conversion of Company common stock and Company preferred stock into the right to receive the merger consideration will occur automatically at the effective time of the merger. The conversion of the equity ownership units of the Company operating partnership into the right to receive the partnership merger consideration will occur automatically at the effective time of the partnership merger. In accordance with the merger agreement, ARCP has appointed  American Stock Transfer & Trust Co., LLC as the exchange agent to handle the payment and delivery of the merger consideration. Prior to the effective time of the merger, ARCP will deposit with the exchange agent cash in an amount sufficient to pay the merger consideration.

As promptly as practicable after the effective time of the merger, but in no event later than two business days thereafter, ARCP or the surviving entity will cause the exchange agent to send to each record holder of a certificate of Company common stock or Company preferred stock at the effective time of the merger, as applicable, a letter of transmittal and instructions explaining how to surrender any stock certificates representing such shares of stock to the exchange agent.

Each holder of Company common stock or Company preferred stock, as applicable, that tenders a duly completed letter of transmittal, each holder of book-entry shares of Company common stock or Company preferred stock and each holder of the equity ownership units of the Company operating partnership will receive the applicable merger consideration or partnership merger consideration due to such Company stockholder or Company operating partnership equity ownership unit holder. After the effective time of the merger, each certificate that previously represented shares of Company common stock or Company preferred stock will only represent the right to receive the merger consideration into which those shares of Company common stock or Company preferred stock, as applicable, have been converted.

Treatment of Company Restricted Stock and Company Performance Shares

Immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, any then-outstanding shares of Company restricted stock will fully vest and the Company will be entitled to deduct and withhold the number of shares of Company common stock otherwise deliverable upon such acceleration to satisfy any applicable withholding taxes, assuming a fair market value of a share of Company common stock equal to the closing price of Company common stock on the last completed trading day immediately prior to the closing date of the merger. If any such deduction results in the issuance of a fractional share, the Company may pay the holder of the fractional share cash equal to the fair market value of such fractional share in lieu thereof. All shares of Company common stock then-outstanding as a result of the full vesting of shares of Company restricted stock, and the satisfaction of any applicable withholding taxes, will be converted at the effective time of the merger into the right to receive $8.50 in cash, without any interest.

Immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, (i) with respect to any Company employee employed on the closing date, 100% of the target number of shares of Company common stock under any then-outstanding performance shares held by such employee will become fully earned and settled, and (ii) with respect to any former Company employee who was entitled to retain any then-outstanding performance shares in accordance with the terms of such award, a number of shares equal to 100% of the target number of shares of Company common stock under any then-outstanding performance shares immediately prior to the effective time of the merger multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days from and after January 1, 2013, that the employee was employed by the Company and the denominator of which is 1,095, will become fully earned and settled. In each case, the Company will be entitled to deduct and withhold the number of shares of Company common stock otherwise deliverable upon such settlement to satisfy any applicable withholding taxes, assuming a fair market value of a share of Company common stock equal to the closing price of Company common stock on the last completed trading day immediately prior to the closing date of the merger; however, if any such deduction results in the issuance of a fractional share, the Company may pay such holder of the fractional share cash equal to the fair market value of such fractional share in lieu thereof. All shares of Company common stock then-outstanding as a result of such settled performance shares, and the satisfaction of any applicable withholding taxes, will be converted at the effective time of the merger into the right to receive $8.50 in cash, without any interest. Prior to the effective time of the merger, the Company will pay the holders of such Company performance shares that become fully earned and settled the amount of any cash dividend equivalent that has accrued with respect to such Company performance shares.

Withholding

All payments under the merger agreement are subject to applicable withholding requirements.

Representations and Warranties

The merger agreement contains a number of representations and warranties made by the Company, the Company operating partnership and the general partner of the Company operating partnership, on the one hand, and ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership and Merger Sub, on the other hand. The representations and warranties were made by the parties as of the date of the merger agreement and do not survive the effective time of the merger. The representations and warranties are subject to certain qualifications and limitations contained in the merger agreement or agreed to by the parties in connection with negotiating the terms of the merger agreement, including information contained in (i) forms, reports and documents filed by the Company with the SEC pursuant to the securities laws on or after January 1, 2011, and prior to the date of the merger agreement and (ii) the Company’s confidential disclosure letter provided by the Company to ARCP in connection with the signing of the merger agreement. The Company’s confidential disclosure letter contains information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to the representations and warranties set forth in the merger agreement.

Representations and Warranties of the Company, the Company Operating Partnership and the General Partner of the Company Operating Partnership

The Company, the Company operating partnership and the general partner of the Company operating partnership made representations and warranties in the merger agreement relating to, among other things:

●      corporate organization, valid existence, good standing and qualification to conduct business;

●      organizational documents;

●      capital structure;

●      entity authority, execution, delivery and validity of the merger agreement;

●      absence of any conflict with or violation of organizational documents or applicable laws, and the absence of any violation or breach of, or default or consent requirements under, certain agreements;

●      compliance with permits and law;

●      SEC filings;

●      financial statements (including that such financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis and fairly present, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position, results of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flow of the Company and its subsidiaries);

●      internal accounting controls;

●      no undisclosed liabilities;

●      disclosure documents to be filed with the SEC in connection with the merger;

●      absence of certain changes or events since January 1, 2013;

●      employee benefit plans;

●      labor and other employment-related matters;

●      material contracts;

●      litigation;

●      environmental matters;

●      intellectual property;

●      real property and leases;

●      taxes;

●      insurance;

●      tax matters, including qualification as a REIT;

●      receipt of opinions of the Company’s financial advisors;

●      exemption of the merger from anti-takeover statutes;

●      stockholder vote required in connection with the merger and the sole general partner vote required in connection with the partnership merger;

●      brokers’, finders’ and investment bankers’ fees;

●      inapplicability of the Investment Company Act of 1940;

●      affiliated transactions;

●      mortgage backed securities; and

●      mortgage loans.

Representations and Warranties of ARCP, the ARCP Operating Partnership and Merger Sub

ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership and Merger Sub made representations and warranties in the merger agreement relating to, among other things:

●      corporate organization, valid existence, good standing and qualification to conduct business;

●      entity authority, execution, delivery and validity of the merger agreement;

●      absence of any conflict with or violation of organizational documents (including the ARCP operating partnership) or applicable laws;

●      disclosure documents;

●      litigation;

●      sole general partner vote required in connection with the partnership merger;

●      brokers’, finders’ and investment bankers’ fees;

●      sufficiency of funds;

●      ownership of Merger Sub and no prior activities thereof; and

●      ownership of Company common stock.

Definition of “Material Adverse Effect”

Many of the representations and warranties of the parties are qualified by a “material adverse effect” standard (that is, they will not be deemed to be untrue or incorrect unless their failure to be true or correct, individually or in the aggregate, has had and would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect). For the purposes of the merger agreement, “material adverse effect,” with respect to the Company, means any event, circumstance, change or effect (i) that is material and adverse to the business, assets, properties, liabilities, financial condition or results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (ii) that will, or would reasonably be expected to, prevent or materially impair the ability of the Company, the Company operating partnership or the general partner of the Company operating partnership to complete the mergers before February 28, 2014. However, any event, circumstance, change or effect will not be considered a material adverse effect to the extent arising out of or resulting from the following:

●      any failure of the Company to meet any projections or forecasts or any decrease in the market price of the Company common stock or the Company preferred stock (except any event, circumstance, change or effect giving rise to such failure or decrease is taken into account in determining whether there has been a material adverse effect);

●      any events, circumstances, changes or effects that affect the commercial real estate REIT industry generally;

●      any changes in the United States or global economy or capital, financial or securities markets generally, including changes in interest or exchange rates;

●      any changes in legal or regulatory conditions;

●      the commencement, escalation or worsening of a war or armed hostilities or the occurrence of acts of terrorism or sabotage;

●      the negotiation, execution or announcement of the merger agreement, or the consummation or anticipation of the mergers or other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; 

●      the taking of any action expressly required by, or the failure to take any action expressly prohibited by, the merger agreement, or the taking of any action at the written request or with the prior written consent of an executive officer of ARCP;

●      fires, earthquakes, tornados, hurricanes, floods or other weather-related events or natural disasters;

●      any damage or destruction of any Company property that is substantially covered by insurance; or

●      changes in law or GAAP;

which, in the case of each of the second, third, fourth, fifth and tenth bullet points above, do not adversely affect the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, in a materially disproportionate manner relative to other similarly situated participants in the commercial real estate REIT industry in the United States.

For the purposes of the merger agreement, “material adverse effect,” with respect to ARCP, means any event, circumstance, change or effect that will, or would reasonably be expected to, prevent or materially impair the ability of ARCP, the ARCP operating partnership or Merger Sub to complete the mergers before February 28, 2014.

Covenants and Agreements

Conduct of Business of the Company Pending the Merger

The Company has agreed to certain restrictions on it and its subsidiaries until the earlier of the effective time of the merger or the valid termination of the merger agreement. In general, except with ARCP’s prior written approval (not to be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned) or as otherwise expressly required or permitted by the merger agreement or required by law, the Company has agreed that it will, and it will cause each of its subsidiaries to, conduct its business in all material respects in the ordinary course and in a manner consistent with past practice, and, subject to the limitations in the merger agreement, use its commercially reasonable efforts to maintain its material assets and properties in their current condition (normal wear and tear and damage caused by casualty or by reasons outside of the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ control excepted), preserve intact in all material respects its current business organization, goodwill, ongoing businesses and relationships with third parties, keep available the services of its present officers and key employees, maintain all of its material insurance policies and maintain the status of the Company as a REIT. The Company has also agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the legal opinion of Hunton & Williams LLP, which is a condition to the obligations of ARCP to complete the merger.