surrealistrader
8 hours ago
For information on the historical mines just secured by Sidney in the Warren Valley, including those said to have recently been tested to contain PGM's (Knott and New Era), read:
Reed, J. C., 1937, Geology And Ore Deposits Of The Warren Mining District, Idaho County, Idaho: Idaho Bureau Of Mines And Geology, Pamphlet 45
The pamphlet can be downloaded here: https://www.idahogeology.org/product/p-45
surrealistrader
2 days ago
This is very high on the scale of how complicated metallurgy can get given their scope. Companies get stuck for years on metallurgy, and almost always without any deadlines to profitability. They usually figure all this out before they can even attempt to figure out if a mine can be profitable and for how long. The multiple stages of feasibility studies take years after all the data is in... A company in their position would want to take their business model to the bank in order to construct a mine... Instead, these guys have jumped ahead and keep accepting cash privately to build and build and build and experiment, and who knows what else, without presenting these necessary scientific and economic studies to investors.
Instead of proving what they have, cost structures, and what they can reasonably sell for profit, they just expand.
"This is not a traditional mining stock" is the answer to every industry-comparability-informed question.
Investors need higher profile money to appeal to this project, but they never cease to hold in contempt the standards by which mining companies are judged by.
surrealistrader
2 days ago
Another mindfuck from Steve Cyros's XRF rig released!
This time it's from an unprocessed and concentrated piece of ore from a newly staked historical mine near their older claims.
Rhodium 867ppm, Palladium 574ppm, Silver 5721ppm, Cadmium 1620ppm, Tin 1162ppm, Antimony 1122ppm
Whoop, no assay chart again, but stay tuned for the rest of the developments coming this fall!
Alarming to me is this Cadmium at such high concentrations given Cyros is handling that alloy with his bare hands. The crushing of such cadmium-laden alloys would definitely create highly toxic fumes to humans... especially given that a mere 1-3ppm when measured in soil is said to be detrimental to plant life.
All this talk of cyanide leach tests, high concentrations of cadmium, antimony, makes me think that permitting will be a factor not to be underestimated after the enormously and increasingly daunting metallurgical issues are solved. The more they work, it seems, the more they lower the overall certainty of their operation's economics, and the more they introduce possible excuses to delay fulfilling their previous astronomical projections of profit into the future. As I have said repeatedly, they can "high grade" through 1-2 years of gold ore, now with the 1 curated certificate of analysis from Dr Demenna showing a necessitated a cyanide leach to liberate the gold, but all that would do would postpone lower grades to be converted later in the life of the operation. Does it stand to reason that these already mined higher grade ores will show up out of nowhere again and again and again?
I am curious to see how this "exploration" and proving out a "World Class Deposit" will result in mineral reserves on any metric accepted by the wider investment community. Upping the ante in this way is a marketing tactic for OTC stock enthusiasts, and maybe late stage gold bull market type people with no experience in this industry, and seems almost intentionally deterring to specialist investors serious about investing in this space.
Either they have done all the due diligence needed to determine that the scope of their new discovery is economical to mine and process for sale, (for those that are new to mining investment, no they haven't) or they are trying to protect the area around it so other companies or individuals don't come in and do their own due diligence, drill, sample or whatnot, outside of what they and only they have the authority to present.
surrealistrader
1 week ago
Hypothetically, would the impurities nobler than gold (PGM's) necessarily be found by anybody that has smelted in this locality before 2023?
....or is SDRC doing something fundamentally different?
PGM's were found at the smelting stage, and overlooked by exploration thusfar, including the drill core studies done in preparation of the report by Goldstone in the 1980s, and not to mention 150+ years of production mining, prospecting, drilling, and otherwise occupation of this area.... so what has been done differently now, that makes smelting so much more complicated? From all the documentation on gold mining in this region, has nobody documented impurities in the slag being impervious to the high temperatures subjected to it? Have its contents beyond the target primary metals never been investigated before?
gitreal
3 weeks ago
Steve Cyrus pops up on multiple shady OTC promotions (a "family" of phony mining companies, including SDRC). The videos he's made for BRGC are particularly amusing - his level of ignorance about geology, mineralogy and exploration are on full display. Holding up a chunk of basalt and calling it lithium ore.....classic. no respect at all for investors.
And yes, an assay for PGMs is relatively cheap, most credible labs can do them, and a day of field work and brief report by an outside qualified mining professional, a couple thousand bucks. SDRC will never do it because they'll end up looking like liars/frauds when the results show no deductible PGMs.
And now they can't cash in on their super sacks of concentrate until end of year?? Why? What is stopping them from shipping a couple tons of that incredibly rich stuff to a smelter? Don't they badly need the money?
surrealistrader
3 weeks ago
It should be easy to produce assays targeting PGM's, especially by now, so I am having trouble coming up with any good reason for why the company still refuses to. The excuses made public concerning traditional assays not being accurate are painful and abhorrent. This is the year 2024, so we have the technology available to do this quickly and inexpensively for goodness sake. No public company should fly any red flags (like this) for longer than absolutely necessary. The thought that they are deliberately holding information back, after saying all they already have on the subject on social media and in filings is a PR disaster.
Also, why is Steve Cyros being photographed recently at Sidney Resources with a bunch of samples and an XRF gun in hand? Isn't this the guy behind the BRGC property and BYRG property? Both are historical producers of industrial metals with novel and unexplained PGM mineralization, no less recently uncovered by use of an XRF gun.
surrealistrader
3 weeks ago
SDRC is a gold stock.
The company has demonstrated that they are on track to start selling a steady stream of gold and silver concentrates by the end of the year.
Everything else found present in these ores may or may not be a precariously stupid distraction. The PGM thesis, and the silence it supposedly necessitates, as management's "control play" secures their claim, is probably counter productive as hell. I am reminded of what we saw with turn-of-the-century early-1900's promotion of any given region's potential, often based merely on anecdotal evidence, in order to attract laborers and investors. They already have said that they think the PGM's are derived from a massive meteorite fragment, showing that they have discounted the possibility of hydrothermal and magmatic sources of PGM's in their rock. They have also released a picture of what they are calling a "PGM Vein." This is all terribly confusing. Where have meteorites ever produced a mineable PGM deposit outside of individual collectors pieces and specimens for study? What company on earth crushes meteorites for their PGM content in order to sell alongside a primary gold product?
It is my opinion that SDRC should NOT invest in equipment and a facility for processing PGM's until the resource is proven economically feasible to mine and process. They shouldn't even advertise PGM's as an economic boon until then. The scope must be established and a feasibility study must be conducted and shown to investors. Nevertheless, as earlier indicated, Sidney is jumping the gun again, consulting with a prospective 3rd party partner to process the PGM's present in their gold ores, and any additional "PGM Veins" found on their existing claims. I must say, this company has a nasty habit of moving forward in using investor capital to build out an operation without proper due diligence, and when it was borderline tolerable before, now the stakes are higher with a (vastly more complicated to economically prove, and relatively much easier to disprove) novel PGM occurrence. It was dangerous when it was just gold and silver, but now that they're moving forward on PGM's, we are in a totally different ball game: lower grades, a broader area needing to be mined, different environmental stuff, higher thermal resistances, higher melting points, different chemical resistances.... If the company moves forward with a PGM thesis, they're back to square 1, and they need to get back to discovery delineation and exploration!
Meanwhile, we have lots of restricted stock becoming unrestricted (which will probably continue and get more intense until the end of the year with a dividend informally announced) and the preemptive selling that always goes along with it. If market-markers net short have been willing to do so when locates are fake, they are guaranteed to waste no time in taking advantage of when locates are real. Sidney's team of volunteer market-makers should get ready to hold their line lest stock price fall below established support. Investors are going to need to take advantage of any and all buying opportunities if euphoric expectations have not already produced an overweight position. Hang in there for that dividend reinvestment squeeze! 🫠
surrealistrader
1 month ago
Strategic Advisory and Collaborations Advisory Expansion
Quoted from SDRC's 2024 Q2 Report on OTCMarkets:
Sidney Resources Corporation has strategically expanded its advisory team to strengthen its leadership as the company navigates through critical growth phases. The appointment of Andrew Prelea, a seasoned industry leader, marks a significant milestone in the company’s journey toward operational excellence and international expansion.
About Andrew Prelea: Andrew Prelea is the CEO of VAST Resources PLC, a London-listed mining and resource development company with operations in Romania and Zimbabwe. With over two decades of experience in the mining sector, Prelea is recognized for his expertise in identifying undervalued assets and transforming them into high-yield ventures. His strategic vision and global experience are expected to play a crucial role in Sidney Resources Corporation’s efforts to scale its operations and optimize its resource base.
Strategic Vision: As a strategic advisor, Prelea will provide insights into global market trends, identify new growth opportunities, and advise on best practices for project management and operational efficiency. His expertise in navigating complex regulatory environments and securing financing for large-scale projects will be invaluable as Sidney Resources expands its operations both domestically and internationally.
Impact on Sidney Resources Corporation: Under Prelea’s guidance, Sidney Resources aims to enhance its operational capabilities, streamline project timelines, and maximize the profitability of its mining ventures. His involvement is anticipated to accelerate the company’s transition from exploration to production, particularly in high-potential areas like the Warren District. Furthermore, his extensive network within the global mining community will facilitate new partnerships, investment opportunities, and technological collaborations, positioning Sidney Resources as a competitive player on the international stage.
gitreal
1 month ago
Commodity Type
A degree of skepticism should also be reserved for ores said to contain uncommon metals or minerals. Because of their rarity, these substances may command a very high price and are therefore extremely attractive to the investor. The platinum-group metals including platinum, palladium, rhodium, ruthenium, iridium, and osmium, are the darlings of the swindler. Considering their high unit-value, even minute amounts of these metals appear to be a reasonably good bet to the innocent investor.
8% iridium??? No ore, no meteorite, nothing natural found on Earth has this concentration of iridium.
Investors should be outraged at the shenanigans going on this year with #PGM, #REE, #iridium, etc. An obvious diversion from an inability to recover gold/silver. Poor, long-suffering, private placement note holders should probably resign themselves to kissing their investment goodbye when this kind of stuff rears its head.
https://azgs.arizona.edu/minerals/mining-scams#Commodity
gitreal
1 month ago
Oh boy, here we go.... unassayable ores!
That pesky iridium!Assaying
Once collected the samples must be properly prepared and assayed. In general, the final sample preparation and assay should be done by qualified laboratories. Assayers registered in Arizona are generally familiar with different types of ore and are knowledgeable about the proper method to test for particular metals or other components.
All ores are amenable to rigid testing and comments to the effect that the ore is unassayable are simple not true. Statements belittling the methods of registered assayers, complaining for example that they never report all the gold, are immediately suspect. Modern copying devices also make it a rather simple procedure to later falsify the assayer's report. If there is any question, of course, the sample pulps (unused prepared portion) may be sent to another lab for comparison.
Spectrographic analyses do not provide an accurate test of mineral samples. This type of analysis, though relatively inexpensive and useful in providing a list of components in a sample, does not yield a reliable, quantitative measure of tenor. Often a billion- or trillion-dollar "ore body" is created by simply multiplying the generalized amount of each of the metals listed in a spectrographic analysis by their current market price. An ore body, however, is not that simple. At this time, there is no commercially acceptable process known whereby each element can be recovered from a deposit.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://azgs.arizona.edu/minerals/mining-scams&ved=2ahUKEwjLq4vm1_yHAxU-EkQIHb7zOHkQFnoECAkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3oOwJgrrnFEIbjL6YR02ww
surrealistrader
1 month ago
Evaluation of Geology for Meteorite Strike
Quoted from SDRC's 2024 Q2 Report on OTCMarkets:
"In an innovative geological study, Steve Dobson, Chief Geologist at Western Frontier Exploration and Mining Company, proposed that a meteoric impact might be the source of the rich ore deposits within the Warren District Project. If confirmed, this theory could significantly alter the geological understanding of the region and its mining potential.
Geological Evidence: Dobson’s research has identified a 30-plus square mile semi-circular depression within the Idaho Batholith, characterized by a layered stratified mafic igneous mass within an alkaline QMP Intrusive body. Geological evidence suggests that this structure may have resulted from a significant meteoric event during the Cretaceous/Tertiary period. The absence of Paleozoic strata, except for some remnants on the depression’s rim, further supports this impact hypothesis.
Impact on Precious Metal Deposits: The Warren District, known for its placer gold and silver deposits, has revealed new insights through ongoing operations and milling tests. These findings have uncovered the presence of platinum group metals within hydrothermal conduits, suggesting a unique chemical composition that could be linked to an extraterrestrial origin. The complex mixture of elements, including iron, gold, silver, iridium, and osmium, adds further weight to the hypothesis of a meteoric impact.
Outreach to Educational Institutions: Recognizing the potential significance of Dobson's hypothesis, Sidney Resources Corporation is proactively reaching out to highly qualified educational institutions to consider launching an extensive study of the Warren Mining District. The goal of this outreach is to engage top-tier universities and research institutions in a collaborative effort to conduct thorough geological and geophysical research. This study would aim to confirm the meteoric impact hypothesis and further explore the implications for mining and mineral recovery in the region.
Sidney Resources is particularly interested in partnering with institutions that specialize in planetary geology, impact cratering, and mineralogy. Such a partnership would not only validate Dobson’s findings but also provide valuable educational and research opportunities, contributing to the broader scientific understanding of meteorite impacts and their economic significance.
Comparative Analysis with Other Impact Sites: Dobson’s hypothesis draws parallels with other significant meteorite impact sites, such as the Beaverhead impact site on the Idaho-Montana border and the Sudbury Basin in Ontario, Canada. These sites exhibit similar geological disruptions and the presence of PGMs, further supporting the possibility that the Warren District could host one of the most valuable mining sites in the United States."
surrealistrader
1 month ago
Metallurgical Testing and Complex Ore Challenges
Quoted from SDRC's 2024 Q2 Report on OTCMarkets:
The metallurgical testing of ores from the Warren District continues to be a crucial aspect of optimizing recovery processes. The complexity of these ores, particularly due to the presence of iridium, osmium, and other PGMs, requires specialized testing techniques.
Challenges with Traditional Fire Assays: Traditional fire assay methods, commonly used to quantify precious metals, can prove ineffective or yield inaccurate results when dealing with complex ores containing iridium and osmium. These elements can cause issues such as low reporting or even invalidation of the assay due to their high melting points and chemical resistance. Sidney Resources has thus explored more advanced metallurgical testing techniques, including ICPMS (Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry) and XRF (X-ray Fluorescence), to achieve more accurate assessments of the ore’s metal content.
Specialized Techniques: Given the unique challenges posed by the Warren District’s ore, the company is employing specialized techniques such as selective leaching, advanced pyro-metallurgical methods, and customized fluxes in assays. These techniques are essential for accurately recovering and quantifying iridium, osmium, and other PGMs, ensuring that the valuable components of the ore are fully accounted for and efficiently extracted.
gitreal
1 month ago
Hilarious!
Sidney Resources Corp.
@SDRCMINING
$SDRC : From
@DonDurrett
of https://goldstockdata.com
"Yesterday, I valued your company at $1.5B at $3K gold."
"Today, I increased it to $2B. I’ve seen several 100K producers valued at around $1.2B at current gold prices. So, a 100K producer at $1.5B is possible at $3K gold. To get to $2B, you will likely have to increase production to 125K oz, although at 3 opt, it’s possible at 100K production. It would be unprecedented."
#Investment #Commentary #OpinionPiece #Gold #Silver #PGMs #Idaho #Producer #Mining #Stocks
gitreal
2 months ago
Its a thing of pride for them to see this company moved forward with integrity.
Sorry, but I just don't see much "integrity". I see some promoters (Hally and SeanRae) with zero technical qualifications to be running a mining company spouting hype, bullshit, and really bad math.
If there is economically minable gold in their mining claims, they have yet to make the case. But they could still succeed if the gold is really there and they are willing spend a few dollars on some legitimate assessment work with credible third-party consultants. Not hyperbolic posts on X from SeanRae quoting Hally quoting some geologist who says "if the XRF data is correct....... Not posting dollar estimates of the value of the "precious metals" in the concentrates using bad math, and without some kind of believable data and assumptions to back up their estimates. If this were a SEC-reporting company....they'd get slapped down big-time for those kinds of screwy dollar estimates.
So yeah.....instead of proving they have gold, all that other garbage (PGMs, REE, meteorites) paints a very bad picture of this company. Very bad.
surrealistrader
2 months ago
Investors should not stand for this kind of hype. Unless they are okay with it and don't care about the dishonesty, in the hopes that it doesn't matter what bullshit is said as long as it results in a run that they can sell into. That might be what's going on.
I do believe you are describing most investors in general who will hope to take part in both the buying and selling of their investments. They would primarily, most exclusively, invest in people who will do what it takes to ensure their investment grows so that some day it can be sold at a higher value. This concept may be foreign to you because you're not an investor.
In the case of SDRC, we have witnessed time frames of investment ranging from a couple years to multiple decades. More often than one would assume from the tone of this conversation, we are witnessing investors in SDRC who will likely hold onto this stock with no plan to sell all of it, or any of it ever. They are even stacking their children's college funds and Roth IRA's with this stock. They do so purely because they believe in the trajectory and ethic of the company so much, and in how well it has treated them over these years.
Call these people what you want. They couldn't care two shits. They're too busy making money, and putting it where it counts. SDRC takes investors like these seriously and sees their investment as a stewardship. investors take SDRC seriously because they have demonstrated stellar drive, ethic, and knowhow to set goals and go after them efficiently, contentiously, with shareholder value as a prime motive.
More than a few of management are investors too. There are no preferred stock issued and nobody as undue control over the share structure. it is a pure corporation and a true group effort. Its a thing of pride for them to see this company moved forward with integrity.
gitreal
2 months ago
It would be super easy, pretty fast, and relatively cheap to prove that PGMs actually occur at the SDRC claims. So why won't they do it?
Any claim that the ores are unassayable, that the PGMs are somehow "hidden" by other metals, or silica.....is bullshit. And that they have to send samples to Germany or some other specialty lab that no one has ever heard of....is bullshit. There are a dozen main-stream, credible labs that can give them their PGM results with reliable results.
Investors should not stand for this kind of hype. Unless they are okay with it and don't care about the dishonesty, in the hopes that it doesn't matter what bullshit is said as long as it results in a run that they can sell into. That might be what's going on.
gitreal
2 months ago
Mistake #1: They say they have 1,381,830 grams of processed concentrates, which they multiply by 35.27 to come up with 48,742,659 ounces. Completely wrong. The conversion from grams of gold to ounces of gold is to divide by 31.103, the actual result being 44,532 oz.
Mistake #2: They assume 80% recovery of their 48,742,659 oz. of concentrate and come up with 38,994.13 oz of "precious metals". The actual answer, using their 48 million oz of concentrate is.....38,994,127 oz. So, it seems they have the numbers right in this calculation, but the decimal is seriously misplaced.
So, bad/careless at math. But what investors should be especially aware of is that they assume the processed concentrates (pictures of which are shown on X in super sacks) are nothing but "precious metals". They don't say what the precious metals are, they don't say what concentrations each precious metal is, and they pick some recovery number out of the air (or somewhere else) as 80%. And it looks like they assume every ounce of that concentrate is pure gold, but still unclear how they came up with that $1,382 number (80% of what??). And typically, you'd smelt concentrate and recovery nearly 100%. So, why 80%, no idea. Any smelter would be quite happy to work with material that has that much precious metals in it.
Funniest thing of all....the pictures of the material in those super sacks looks like....sand. Not concentrate, which would normally be gray or black.
Another super sack of concentrates! $SDRC
Concentrate - A fine, powdery product of the milling process containing a high percentage of valuable metal.#Idaho #Gold #Silver #PGMs #Mining #Production #Progress #WorkContinues #Invest #America #Success #Video @wfmining pic.twitter.com/R7uC3KjIKZ— Sidney Resources Corp. (@SDRCMINING) July 1, 2024
Sidney Resources Corp.
@SDRCMINING
Another super sack of concentrates! $SDRC
Concentrate - A fine, powdery product of the milling process containing a high percentage of valuable metal.
#Idaho #Gold #Silver #PGMs #Mining #Production #Progress #WorkContinues #Invest #America #Success #Video
@wfmining
0:17 / 0:34
6:05 AM · Jul 1, 2024
·
6,198
Views
surrealistrader
2 months ago
The cited "Estimated Results" is clearly far from a definitive nor exhaustive account. Let's not pretend that it is or is even meant to be. For conversations sake, I do see some problems that could lead to a wide margin of error if you were to treat it as such. We must understand that we will necessarily not have access to the same information the company does in order to do that though:
One thing that stands out to me is the conversion of grams to ounces instead of troy ounces. The spot price of precious metals is the market's conversion rate per troy ounce. There are approximately 31.1035 grams in a troy ounce. 1,381,830 grams would equal 44,416 troy ounces.
The value of $1382.00 per ounce is stated as a "portion of the potential values." This implies there might be higher possible values, but does not provide a basis for the chosen value. For calculations sake, market fluctuations and metal purity levels have already seriously affected this value, and gold is clearly not the only metal present in any of their concentrations. Recovered Ounces = 44,416 × 0.80 = 35,533 ounces. Total Value = 35,533 ounces × 1382.00 dollars/ounce = 49,111,906 dollars. A small difference, perhaps.
The aforementioned problems are not what concern me as an investor. The margin of error between $49million and $53million for 6 months of work (set to expand) is nominal. What will interest me most are calculations confirming previous projections of the stockpiles grade, and a break down of all in sustaining costs of running this operation, in order to arrive at a projected long term value of the project. We don't know how much stockpiled ore it took to create this amount of product, nor do we have a break down of costs to know how much profit will be available for the company and shareholders.
That all being said, I appreciate the preview from SDRC but realize that every one of these numbers can and probably will change.
gitreal
2 months ago
https://x.com/SDRCMINING/status/1811400089044132267
Initial Production Report (Estimated Results)
As of July 10, 2024, Sidney Resources Corporation had crushed and milled material to produce 1,381,830 grams of processed concentrates. This translates to 48,742,659 ounces ready for re-concentration and leaching. If we conservatively anticipate 80% recovery, there will be around 38,994.13 ounces of precious metals. If Sidney is successful in recovering $1382.00 per ounce (a portion of the potential values), the year-to-date minimum value will be $53,889,883.35.
There are two serious math errors in this statement by SDRC. Can you spot them?
Aside from the ambiguous term "precious metals" and why they can't spell out exactly what is in the concentrates. This isn't rocket science, yet they seem to struggle with simple stuff.
gitreal
2 months ago
REE may not be pursued beyond the detectable levels of XRF.
Some REE are very easily detectable with XRF, but still would be several orders of magnitude below any level of interest. I have submitted hundreds of samples for whole rock geochem analyses and amongst all the metals, etc. also received REE results that are above what would be considered "background". But are still so far from economic that it is nothing more than a curiosity.
I don't see how PGM's wouldn't be found in anything that isn't an amount measured in ppm.
If I interpret your triple negative properly, I think you are saying that if there are any detectable PGMs they'd be in the PPM range? Is that what you are saying? That's not really true, a good fire assay for PGMs would "see" them down into the ppb range. And as I said before, I would be willing to bet money that there are no detectable PGMs in the rocks at the SDRC claims, even at ppb levels.
It remains to be seen if anything beyond the gold and silver (or even the gold and silver for that matter) can or will be proven to be of an economic / commercial grade resource
They've already said quite boldly that there is $53 million worth of precious metal in their stockpiles. Now you're saying that remains to be seen?
surrealistrader
2 months ago
Filtering through the flagrant remarks and assumptions of failure,
I do think your suggestions are reasonable. The PGM's should be presented as is.... In original sample amount, raw ore grade; Not concentrated amount because there's plausible deniability that the math could be wrong or fudged. This is one of the situations where it will be worth presenting with accredited opinion, and a brief report for context.
REE should be presented as-is as well, but as-is only... especially if they are not prepared to pursue what they could reasonably concur to be an economical resource of REE (or the possibility thereof.) Those detected are merely at or near XRF threshold levels as far as presented so far. Unless they have new undisclosed information about these proving otherwise, I doubt they will be pursued as a resource. The fact that Sean has pointed out XRF readings of REE may be somewhat of a "red flag" but probably not a malignant one as if it necessarily means outright fraud. Like you said, REE's are relatively common and exist almost ubiquitously in at or near detectability thresholds. He didn't lie, though he did get excited about it, and did expect others to as well. Perhaps it is amateurish at best... and some may insist this judgement isn't one to be made by a qualified CEO. My personal preference would be to remain reserved and prudent with these things as well. I think its forgivable, but look forward to them presenting some more definitive findings when appropriate.
Sean's last tweet was very telling, and does answer some, if not all questions about what the company's plans are with any new discoveries. I don't think they realized how groundbreaking it is to have such a problem of PGM's in their stockpiles at the time they first disclosed it. I think they are realizing a bit too late how much more calculated, strategic, and prudent it will be appropriate to be with the cards that are in their hand. We agree that the prize is big if they can substantiate some of the claims being thrown around so far, and will work to secure their interests before doing so lest it provoke competitors.
I am working on buying property regionally for the corporation and creating partnerships with other properties that are controlled by other groups. This is a control play. It takes time. The data is fantastic. I will publish it as soon as I am able. Strategically, I have already shared more than I want but I want the shareholders to know why I have not published the amazing assays.
News
Market Data
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
Ask ADVFN Intelligence (AI)
WizardDomain54
1 day ago
