Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
As of and for the 6 months ended June 30,
2014
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share
amounts)
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
– Pacific Financial Corporation (the “Company” or “Pacific”) is a bank holding company headquartered
in Aberdeen, Washington. The Company owns one bank, Bank of the Pacific (the “Bank”), which is also located in Washington.
The Company was incorporated in the State of Washington in February, 1997, pursuant to a holding company reorganization of the
Bank.
The
Company conducts its banking business through the Bank, which operates 16 branches located in communities in Grays Harbor, Pacific,
Whatcom, Skagit and Wahkiakum counties in the state of Washington and three in Clatsop County, Oregon. In addition, the Bank operates
three loan production offices in Burlington, Dupont and Vancouver, Washington and has a residential real estate mortgage department.
During second quarter 2013, the Bank completed the acquisition of three branches from Sterling Savings Bank. Total deposits assumed
were $37.6 million and loans acquired totaled $4.0 million. Of the three branches purchased, two were consolidated into existing
Pacific branches to maximize branch efficiencies resulting in one new branch in Astoria, Oregon. Separately, the Company opened
a full-service branch in Warrenton, Oregon in October 2013 that further expands operations on the northern Oregon coast.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements have been prepared by Pacific Financial Corporation ("Pacific" or the "Company") in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") for interim financial information
and with instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of Management, adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2014, are
not necessarily indicative of the results anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2014. Certain information and footnote
disclosures included in the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013, have been condensed
or omitted from this report. Accordingly, these statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes
thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “2013 Annual
Report”).
Basis of presentation
– The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bank of the Pacific and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The interim consolidated financial statements
are not audited, but include all adjustments that Management considers necessary for a fair presentation of consolidated financial
condition and results of operations for the interim periods presented.
Method of accounting and use of estimates
– The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America and prevailing practices within the banking industry. This requires Management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates made by Management involve the calculation of the allowance
for loan losses, impaired loans, the fair value of available-for-sale investment securities, deferred tax assets, and the value
of other real estate owned and foreclosed assets.
The Company utilizes the accrual method
of accounting, which recognizes income when earned and expenses when incurred.
In preparing these financial statements,
the Company has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to June 30, 2014, for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements. In Management’s opinion, all accounting adjustments necessary to accurately reflect the financial position and
results of operations on the accompanying financial statements have been made. These adjustments include normal and recurring accruals
considered necessary for a fair and accurate presentation.
Cash dividends
– No
cash dividends were declared in the quarter ended June 30, 2014.
NOTE 2 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company’s basic earnings per
common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders (net income less dividends declared by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period). The Company’s diluted earnings per common share is computed
similar to basic earnings per common share except that the numerator is equal to net income available to common shareholders
and the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive
potential common shares had been issued. Included in the denominator are the dilutive effects of stock options computed under the
treasury stock method and outstanding warrants as if converted to common stock.
The following table illustrates the computation
of basic and diluted earnings per share.
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,403
|
|
|
$
|
1,332
|
|
|
$
|
2,431
|
|
|
$
|
2,033
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
10,189,386
|
|
|
|
10,121,853
|
|
|
|
10,185,755
|
|
|
|
10,121,853
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,403
|
|
|
$
|
1,332
|
|
|
$
|
2,431
|
|
|
$
|
2,033
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
10,189,386
|
|
|
|
10,121,853
|
|
|
|
10,185,755
|
|
|
|
10,121,853
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
86,242
|
|
|
|
60,671
|
|
|
|
88,239
|
|
|
|
50,503
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution
|
|
|
10,275,628
|
|
|
|
10,182,524
|
|
|
|
10,273,994
|
|
|
|
10,172,356
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares subject to outstanding options
|
|
|
365,095
|
|
|
|
468,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares subject to outstanding warrants
|
|
|
410,542
|
|
|
|
699,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2014 and 2013, the shares
subject to outstanding options and the shares subject to outstanding warrants had exercise prices in excess of the current market
value. All of these shares are not included in the table above, as exercise of these options and warrants would not be dilutive
to shareholders.
NOTE 3 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment securities consist principally
of short and intermediate term debt instruments issued by the U.S. Treasury, other U.S. government agencies, state and
local government units, other corporations, and mortgage backed securities (MBS).
Investment securit ies at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013
consisted of the following:
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
cost
|
|
|
|
gains
|
|
|
|
losses
|
|
|
|
value
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: agency issued
|
|
$
|
39,336
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
38,822
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: non-agency
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: agency issued
|
|
|
11,980
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
11,919
|
|
U.S. Government and agency securities
|
|
|
8,674
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
8,721
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
28,043
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
28,646
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
88,647
|
|
|
$
|
1,184
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
|
$
|
88,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: agency issued
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
1,871
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
cost
|
|
|
gains
|
|
|
losses
|
|
|
value
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: agency issued
|
|
$
|
39,791
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
1,246
|
|
|
$
|
38,791
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: non agency
|
|
|
2,251
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: agency issued
|
|
|
13,671
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
13,389
|
|
U.S. Government agency securities
|
|
|
8,859
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
8,811
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
31,973
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
32,160
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
97,536
|
|
|
$
|
1,078
|
|
|
$
|
2,470
|
|
|
$
|
96,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: agency issued
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
2,132
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,158
|
|
Unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated
by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in continuous unrealized loss position, as of June
30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, are summarized as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12
months
|
|
|
12 months or
more
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
At June 30, 2014
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
agency issued
|
|
$
|
13,594
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
15,987
|
|
|
$
|
635
|
|
|
$
|
29,581
|
|
|
$
|
734
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: non agency
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: agency issued
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
7,863
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
8,373
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
U.S. Government agency securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,627
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
3,627
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8,916
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
10,590
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,778
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
36,620
|
|
|
$
|
1,011
|
|
|
$
|
52,398
|
|
|
$
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
Less than 12
months
|
|
|
12 months or
more
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
At December 31, 2013
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations:
agency issued
|
|
$
|
21,043
|
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
|
$
|
6,265
|
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
$
|
27,308
|
|
|
$
|
1,246
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: non agency
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
1,619
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: agency issued
|
|
|
7,752
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
10,395
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
U.S. Government agency securities
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
11,551
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
1,821
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
13,372
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
47,267
|
|
|
$
|
1,599
|
|
|
$
|
12,348
|
|
|
$
|
871
|
|
|
$
|
59,615
|
|
|
$
|
2,470
|
|
At June 30, 2014, there were 64 investment
securities in an unrealized loss position, of which 47 were in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more. The unrealized
losses on these securities were caused by changes in interest rates, widening pricing spreads and market illiquidity, leading to
a decline in the fair value subsequent to their purchase. The Company has evaluated the securities shown above and anticipates
full recovery of amortized cost with respect to these securities at maturity or sooner in the event of a more favorable market
environment. Based on management’s evaluation, and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities
and it is not more likely than not that it will have to sell the securities before recovery of cost basis, the Company does not
consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2014.
For non-agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) the Company estimates
expected future cash flows of the underlying collateral, together with any credit enhancements. The expected future cash flows
of the underlying collateral are determined using the remaining contractual cash flows adjusted for future expected credit losses
(which considers current delinquencies, future expected default rates and collateral value by vintage) and prepayments. The expected
cash flows of the security are then discounted to arrive at a present value amount. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, no
non-agency MBS was determined to be other-than-temporarily-impaired. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, one non-agency MBS
was determined to be other-than-temporarily-impaired. This security was sold in the current quarter, incurring a loss of $69,000.
The Company recorded $48,000 and $34,000 in impairments related to credit losses through earnings for the six months ended June
30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The following table presents the cash proceeds
from the sales of securities and their associated gross realized gains and gross realized losses that are included in earnings
for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
Investment securities gross gains and losses
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
Gross realized gain on sale of securities
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
Gross realized loss on sale of securities
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on sale of securities
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of securities
|
|
$
|
8,979
|
|
|
$
|
1,171
|
|
|
$
|
13,828
|
|
|
$
|
4,158
|
|
The Company did not engage in originating subprime mortgage
loans, and it does not believe that it has material exposure to subprime mortgage loans or subprime mortgage backed securities.
Additionally, the Company does not own any sovereign debt of Eurozone nations or structured financial products, such as collateralized
debt obligations or structured investment vehicles, which are known by the Company to have elevated risk characteristics.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value
of investment securities at June 30, 2014, by maturity are shown below. The amortized cost and fair value of collateralized
mortgage obligations and mortgage-backed securities are presented by expected average life, rather than contractual maturity.
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to prepay underlying loans without
prepayment penalties.
At June 30, 2014
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Held-to-maturity
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,084
|
|
|
$
|
1,086
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,027
|
|
|
|
7,022
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
12,673
|
|
|
|
12,930
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
15,915
|
|
|
|
16,328
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
51,948
|
|
|
|
51,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
$
|
1,871
|
|
|
$
|
1,894
|
|
|
$
|
88,647
|
|
|
$
|
88,712
|
|
At June 30, 2014, investment securities
with an estimated fair value of $69.0 million were pledged to secure public deposits, certain nonpublic deposits and borrowings.
As required of all members of the Federal
Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system, the Company maintains an investment in the capital stock of the FHLB in an amount equal
to the greater of $500,000 or 0.5% of home mortgage loans and pass-through securities plus 5.0% of the outstanding balance of mortgage
home loans sold to FHLB under the Mortgage Purchase Program. The FHLB system, the largest government sponsored entity in the United
States, is made up of 12 regional banks, including the FHLB of Seattle. Participating banks record the value of FHLB stock equal
to its par value at $100 per share. At June 30, 2014, the Company held approximately $3.0 million in FHLB stock.
The Company is required to hold FHLB’s
stock in order to receive advances and views this investment as long-term. Thus, when evaluating it for impairment, the value is
determined based on the recovery of the par value through redemption by the FHLB or from the sale to another member, rather than
by recognizing temporary declines in value. The FHLB of Seattle disclosed that it reported net income for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2014, at which time it declared a cash dividend. On November 22, 2013, the FHLB of Seattle entered into
an amended Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order with the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“Finance Agency”),
modifying the previous order issued on October 25, 2010. The Finance Agency now deems the FHLB of Seattle to be “adequately
capitalized” under the Finance Agency’s Prompt Corrective Action rule. The Company has concluded that its investment
in FHLB is not impaired as of June 30, 2014, and believes that it will ultimately recover the par value of its investment in this
stock.
NOTE 4 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES AND CREDIT
QUALITY
Loans
Loans
held in the portfolio at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, are as follows:
Loans as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
$
|
109,368
|
|
|
$
|
104,111
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
32,071
|
|
|
|
29,096
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
|
|
90,549
|
|
|
|
87,762
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
20,110
|
|
|
|
17,520
|
|
Commercial real estate — owner occupied
|
|
|
117,203
|
|
|
|
105,594
|
|
Commercial real estate — non owner occupied
|
|
|
124,929
|
|
|
|
117,294
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
23,900
|
|
|
|
23,698
|
|
Consumer/Finance
|
|
|
30,241
|
|
|
|
20,728
|
|
Gross loans
|
|
|
548,371
|
|
|
|
505,803
|
|
Less: deferred fees
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
(1,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Loans
|
|
$
|
547,283
|
|
|
$
|
504,666
|
|
Allowance for losses and credit quality
The allowance for loan losses represents
the Company’s estimate as to the probable credit losses inherent in its loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is
increased through periodic charges to earnings through provision for loan losses and represents the aggregate amount, net of loans
charged-off and recoveries on previously charged-off loans, that is needed to establish an appropriate reserve for credit losses.
The allowance is estimated based on a variety of factors and using a methodology as described below:
|
·
|
The Company classifies loans into relatively homogeneous pools by loan type in accordance with
regulatory guidelines for regulatory reporting purposes. The Company regularly reviews all loans within each loan category to establish
risk ratings for them that include Pass, Watch, Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful and Loss. Pursuant to “Accounting
by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”, the impaired portion of collateral dependent loans is charged-off. Other risk-related
loans not considered impaired have loss factors applied to the various loan pool balances to establish loss potential for provisioning
purposes.
|
|
·
|
Analyses are performed to establish the loss factors based on historical experience, as well as
expected losses based on qualitative evaluations of such factors as the economic trends and conditions, industry conditions, levels
and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans, levels and trends in charge-offs and recoveries, among others. The loss factors
are applied to loan category pools segregated by risk classification to estimate the loss inherent in the Company’s loan
portfolio pursuant to “Accounting for Contingencies.”
|
|
·
|
Additionally, impaired loans are evaluated for loss potential on an individual basis in accordance
with “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” and specific reserves are established based on thorough analysis
of collateral values where loss potential exists. When an impaired loan is collateral dependent and a deficiency exists in the
fair value of collateral securing the loan in comparison to the associated loan balance, the deficiency is charged-off at that
time or a specific reserve is established. Impaired loans are reviewed no less frequently than quarterly.
|
|
·
|
In the event that a current appraisal to support the fair value of the real estate collateral underlying
an impaired loan has not yet been received, but the Company believes that the collateral value is insufficient to support the loan
amount, an impairment reserve is recorded. In these instances, the receipt of a current appraisal triggers an updated review of
the collateral support for the loan and any deficiency is charged-off or reserved at that time. In those instances where a current
appraisal is not available in a timely manner in relation to a financial reporting cut-off date, the Company discounts the most
recent third-party appraisal depending on a number of factors including, but not limited to, property location, local price volatility,
local economic conditions, and recent comparable sales. In all cases, the costs to sell the subject property are deducted in arriving
at the fair value of the collateral.
|
Changes in the allowance for credit losses
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
Allowance for Credit Losses
Dollars in Thousands
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Estate ("CRE")
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
3,603
|
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
2,463
|
|
|
$
|
8,288
|
|
Charge-offs and concessions
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
Provision / (recapture)
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
|
$
|
3,807
|
|
|
$
|
702
|
|
|
$
|
882
|
|
|
$
|
2,020
|
|
|
$
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
775
|
|
|
$
|
3,506
|
|
|
$
|
675
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
|
$
|
2,659
|
|
|
$
|
8,359
|
|
Charge-offs and concessions
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
Provision / (recapture)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
(639
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
|
$
|
3,807
|
|
|
$
|
702
|
|
|
$
|
882
|
|
|
$
|
2,020
|
|
|
$
|
8,315
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses
Dollars in Thousands
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Estate ("CRE")
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
711
|
|
|
$
|
3,743
|
|
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
$
|
3,565
|
|
|
$
|
9,348
|
|
Charge-offs and concessions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Provision / (recapture)
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
809
|
|
|
$
|
3,414
|
|
|
$
|
813
|
|
|
$
|
638
|
|
|
$
|
3,288
|
|
|
$
|
8,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
923
|
|
|
$
|
4,098
|
|
|
$
|
829
|
|
|
$
|
531
|
|
|
$
|
2,977
|
|
|
$
|
9,358
|
|
Charge-offs and concessions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Provision / (recapture)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(853
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
809
|
|
|
$
|
3,414
|
|
|
$
|
813
|
|
|
$
|
638
|
|
|
$
|
3,288
|
|
|
$
|
8,962
|
|
Recorded investment in loans as of June 30, 2014 and 2013 are
as follows:
Recorded Investment in Financing Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in Thousands
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Estate ("CRE")
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
As of June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
|
$
|
3,807
|
|
|
$
|
702
|
|
|
$
|
882
|
|
|
$
|
2,020
|
|
|
$
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
109,368
|
|
|
$
|
298,103
|
|
|
$
|
110,659
|
|
|
$
|
30,241
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
548,371
|
|
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
|
$
|
7,785
|
|
|
$
|
776
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,025
|
|
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
108,957
|
|
|
$
|
290,318
|
|
|
$
|
109,883
|
|
|
$
|
30,188
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
539,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less deferred fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance total loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
547,283
|
|
Recorded Investment in Financing Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars in Thousands
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Estate ("CRE")
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
As of December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
775
|
|
|
$
|
3,506
|
|
|
$
|
675
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
|
$
|
2,659
|
|
|
$
|
8,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
104,111
|
|
|
$
|
275,682
|
|
|
$
|
105,282
|
|
|
$
|
20,728
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
505,803
|
|
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
|
$
|
8,656
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,922
|
|
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
103,524
|
|
|
$
|
267,026
|
|
|
$
|
104,656
|
|
|
$
|
20,675
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
495,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less deferred fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance total loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
504,666
|
|
Credit Quality Indicators
Federal regulations require that the Bank
periodically evaluate the risks inherent in its loan portfolios. In addition, the Washington Division of Banks and the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) have authority to identify problem loans and, if appropriate, require them to
be reclassified. There are three classifications for problem loans: Substandard, Doubtful, and Loss. These terms are used as follows:
|
·
|
“Substandard” loans have one or more defined
weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility some loss will be sustained if the deficiencies are not corrected.
|
|
·
|
“Doubtful” loans have the weaknesses of loans
classified as "Substandard," with additional characteristics that suggest the weaknesses make collection or recovery
in full after liquidation of collateral questionable on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values. There is
a high possibility of loss in loans classified as "Doubtful."
|
|
·
|
“Loss” loans are considered uncollectible
and of such little value that continued classification of the credit as a loan is not warranted. If a loan or a portion thereof
is classified as "Loss," it must be charged-off; meaning the amount of the loss is charged against the allowance for
credit losses, thereby reducing that reserve.
|
The Bank also classifies some loans as
“Pass” or Other Loans Especially Mentioned (“OLEM”). Within the Pass classification certain loans are “Watch”
rated because they have elements of risk that require more monitoring than other performing loans. Pass grade loans include a range
of loans from very high credit quality to acceptable credit quality. These borrowers generally have strong to acceptable capital
levels and consistent earnings and debt service capacity. Loans with higher grades within the Pass category may include borrowers
who are experiencing unusual operating difficulties, but have acceptable payment performance to date. Overall, loans with a Pass
grade show no immediate loss exposure. Loans classified as OLEM continue to perform but have shown deterioration in credit quality
and require close monitoring.
(Dollars in Thousands)
Credit quality indicators as of June 30, 2014 and December 31,
2013 were as follows:
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
Other Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Especially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
Mentioned
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
$
|
101,018
|
|
|
$
|
7,581
|
|
|
$
|
769
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
109,368
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
30,748
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32,071
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
|
|
87,049
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
2,741
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
90,549
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
19,839
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,110
|
|
Commercial real estate — owner occupied
|
|
|
109,489
|
|
|
|
3,885
|
|
|
|
3,829
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
117,203
|
|
Commercial real estate — non owner occupied
|
|
|
94,940
|
|
|
|
23,717
|
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
124,929
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
20,474
|
|
|
|
2,422
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23,900
|
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
362,539
|
|
|
|
31,104
|
|
|
|
15,119
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
408,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer/Finance
|
|
|
30,106
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less deferred fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
493,663
|
|
|
$
|
38,745
|
|
|
$
|
15,963
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
547,283
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Other Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Especially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
Mentioned
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
$
|
100,262
|
|
|
$
|
2,858
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
104,111
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
26,587
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29,096
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
|
|
84,407
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
2,801
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
87,762
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
17,520
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,520
|
|
Commercial real estate — owner occupied
|
|
|
100,612
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
3,963
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
105,594
|
|
Commercial real estate — non owner occupied
|
|
|
98,044
|
|
|
|
16,752
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
117,294
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
20,228
|
|
|
|
2,464
|
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23,698
|
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
347,398
|
|
|
|
21,890
|
|
|
|
11,676
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
380,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer/Finance
|
|
|
20,570
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less deferred fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
468,230
|
|
|
$
|
24,810
|
|
|
$
|
12,763
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
504,666
|
|
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans by type as of June 30, 2014,
and interest income recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, were as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Month
|
|
|
6 Month
|
|
|
3 Month
|
|
|
6 Month
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no Related Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
415
|
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRE — owner occupied
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
1,763
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
CRE — non owner occupied
|
|
|
4,267
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
|
|
4,346
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
3,331
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,758
|
|
|
$
|
9,025
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,489
|
|
|
$
|
9,633
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With a Related Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer/Finance
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Impaired Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
415
|
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRE — owner occupied
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
1,763
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
CRE — non owner occupied
|
|
|
4,267
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,229
|
|
|
|
4,346
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
3,331
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Total Impaired Loans
|
|
$
|
11,758
|
|
|
$
|
9,025
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,489
|
|
|
$
|
9,633
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
Impaired loans by type as of June 30, 2013,
and interest income recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, were as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Month
|
|
|
6 Month
|
|
|
3 Month
|
|
|
6 Month
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no Related Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
1,199
|
|
|
$
|
1,202
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,388
|
|
|
$
|
1,665
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRE — owner occupied
|
|
|
2,866
|
|
|
|
2,866
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,888
|
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
CRE — non owner occupied
|
|
|
6,773
|
|
|
|
4,576
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,505
|
|
|
|
5,601
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,386
|
|
|
$
|
12,651
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
13,815
|
|
|
$
|
14,137
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With a Related Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Impaired Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
1,199
|
|
|
$
|
1,202
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,388
|
|
|
$
|
1,665
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
1,794
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRE — owner occupied
|
|
|
2,866
|
|
|
|
2,866
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,888
|
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
CRE — non owner occupied
|
|
|
6,773
|
|
|
|
4,576
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,505
|
|
|
|
5,601
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total Impaired Loans
|
|
$
|
17,594
|
|
|
$
|
12,859
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
13,920
|
|
|
$
|
14,206
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
Aging Analysis
The following tables summarize the Company’s
loans past due, both accruing and nonaccruing, by type as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-59 Days
|
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
|
Than
|
|
|
Total Past
|
|
|
Non-accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
90 Days
|
|
|
Due
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
June 30, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
109,228
|
|
|
$
|
109,368
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
30,798
|
|
|
|
32,071
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
89,942
|
|
|
|
90,549
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,110
|
|
|
|
20,110
|
|
Commercial real estate — owner occupied
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
|
115,596
|
|
|
|
117,203
|
|
Commercial real estate — non owner occupied
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
123,100
|
|
|
|
124,929
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
22,945
|
|
|
|
23,900
|
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
6,218
|
|
|
|
402,491
|
|
|
|
408,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer/Finance
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
30,125
|
|
|
|
30,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less deferred fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
(1,088
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
$
|
6,388
|
|
|
$
|
540,756
|
|
|
$
|
547,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
103,811
|
|
|
$
|
104,111
|
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
27,688
|
|
|
|
29,096
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
87,029
|
|
|
|
87,762
|
|
Multi-family
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,520
|
|
|
|
17,520
|
|
Commercial real estate — owner occupied
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
103,935
|
|
|
|
105,594
|
|
Commercial real estate — non owner occupied
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
|
|
114,812
|
|
|
|
117,294
|
|
Farmland
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
21,868
|
|
|
|
23,698
|
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
6,904
|
|
|
|
372,852
|
|
|
|
380,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer/Finance
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
20,507
|
|
|
|
20,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less deferred fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,137
|
)
|
|
|
(1,137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,387
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,390
|
|
|
$
|
7,243
|
|
|
$
|
496,033
|
|
|
$
|
504,666
|
|
Modifications
A modification of a loan constitutes a
troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the modification constitutes
a concession. There are various types of concessions when modifying a loan, however, forgiveness of principal is rarely granted
by the Company. Commercial and industrial loans modified in a TDR may involve term extensions, below market interest rates
and/or interest-only payments wherein the delay in the repayment of principal is determined to be significant when all elements
of the loan and circumstances are considered. Additional collateral, a co-borrower, or a guarantor is often required. Commercial
mortgage and construction loans modified in a TDR often involve reducing the interest rate for the remaining term of the loan,
extending the maturity date at an interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, or substituting
or adding a new borrower or guarantor. Construction loans modified in a TDR may also involve extending the interest-only
payment period. Residential mortgage loans modified in a TDR are primarily comprised of loans where monthly payments are
lowered to accommodate the borrowers’ financial needs. Land loans are typically structured as interest-only monthly payments
with a balloon payment due at maturity. Land loans modified in a TDR typically involve extending the balloon payment by one
to three years, and providing an interest rate concession. Home equity modifications are made infrequently and are uniquely designed
to meet the specific needs of each borrower.
Loans modified in a TDR are typically already
on non-accrual status and partial charge-offs have in some cases already been taken against the outstanding loan balance.
Loans modified in a TDR for the Company may have the financial effect of increasing the specific allowance associated with the
loan. An allowance for impaired loans that have been modified in a TDR is measured based on the present value of expected
future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the estimated
fair value of the collateral, less any selling costs, if the loan is collateral dependent. The Company’s practice is
to re-appraise collateral dependent loans every six to nine months. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, there was no impact
on the allowance from TDRs during the period, as the loans classified as TDRs during the period did not have a specific reserve
and were already considered impaired loans at the time of modification and no further impairment was required upon modification.
The Company closely monitors the performance of modified loans
for delinquency, as delinquency is considered an early indicator of possible future default. The allowance may be increased, adjustments
may be made in the allocation of the allowance, or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of
the loan.
The following table presents TDRs for the
six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, all of which were modified due to financial stress of the borrower.
Restructured loans by type current and subsequently defaulted
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
Current Restructured Loans
|
|
|
Subsequently Defaulted Restructured Loans
|
|
|
|
Number of
Loans
|
|
|
Pre-TDR
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Post-TDR
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Number of Loans
|
|
|
Pre-TDR
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Post-TDR
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
Commercial and agriculture
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,764
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
CRE — owner occupied
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
CRE — non owner occupied
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total restructured loans
(1)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
5,610
|
|
|
$
|
3,909
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
Current Restructured Loans
|
|
|
Subsequently Defaulted Restructured Loans
|
|
|
|
Number of
Loans
|
|
|
Pre-TDR
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Post-TDR
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Number of Loans
|
|
|
Pre-TDR
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Post-TDR
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
Commercial and agriculture
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2,972
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
CRE — owner occupied
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
CRE — non owner occupied
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total restructured loans
(1)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
5,818
|
|
|
$
|
4,134
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
(1) The period end balances are inclusive of all partial paydowns
and charge-offs since the modification date.
There were no loans modified as a TDR within
the previous 12 months that subsequently defaulted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. Loans classified as TDRs
are considered impaired loans. The Company had no commitments to lend additional funds for loans classified as TDRs at June 30,
2014.
The following tables summarize the Company’s
troubled debt restructured loans by type and geographic region as of June 30, 2014:
Restructured loans by type and geographic region
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
Restructured Loans
|
|
|
|
Central Western
Washington
|
|
|
Southwestern
Washington
|
|
|
Northern
Washington
|
|
|
Oregon
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
Number
of Loans
|
|
Commercial and agriculture
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
CRE — owner occupied
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
CRE — non owner occupied
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total restructured loans
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3,201
|
|
|
$
|
654
|
|
|
$
|
3,909
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
The following table presents troubled debt restructurings by
accrual or nonaccrual status as of June 30, 2014 and 2013:
Restructured loans by accrual or nonaccrual status
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans
|
|
|
|
Accrual Status
|
|
|
Non-accrual
Status
|
|
|
Total
Modifications
|
|
Commercial and agriculture
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
CRE — owner occupied
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
CRE — non owner occupied
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
Total restructured loans
|
|
$
|
2,636
|
|
|
$
|
1,273
|
|
|
$
|
3,909
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans
|
|
|
|
Accrual Status
|
|
|
Non-accrual
Status
|
|
|
Total
Modifications
|
|
Commercial and agriculture
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
CRE — owner occupied
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
CRE — non owner occupied
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
Total restructured loans
|
|
$
|
2,719
|
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
|
$
|
4,134
|
|
NOTE 5 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME/(LOSS)
The following table presents the changes
in each component of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Net Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Investment
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2014
|
|
$
|
(919
|
)
|
|
$
|
(450
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive gain before reclassifications net of tax
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Net Current period other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2014
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
(392
|
)
|
|
$
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
Net Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Investment
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2013
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
$
|
(535
|
)
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive gain before reclassifications net of tax
|
|
|
(1,770
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(1,714
|
)
|
Amounts reclassified from AOCI
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
Net Current period other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,003
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(1,947
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2013
|
|
$
|
(1,047
|
)
|
|
$
|
(479
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,526
|
)
|
The following table presents the amounts
reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details about Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income Components
|
|
Amounts Reclassified
from AOCI
|
|
|
Affected Line Item in the
Statement Where Net
Income is Presented
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June
|
|
|
Ended June
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2014
|
|
|
30, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Gains and Losses
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
(Gain)/loss on sales of investments available for sale
|
on Investment Securities
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Net OTTI loses
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Net of tax
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details about Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income Components
|
|
Amounts Reclassified
from AOCI
|
|
|
Affected Line Item in the
Statement Where
Net Income is Presented
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June
|
|
|
Ended June
|
|
|
|
|
|
30, 2013
|
|
|
30, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Gains and Losses
|
|
$
|
(329
|
)
|
|
$
|
(387
|
)
|
|
(Gain) on sales of investments available for sale
|
on Investment Securities
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
Net OTTI losses
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
$
|
(195
|
)
|
|
$
|
(233
|
)
|
|
Net of tax
|
The following table presents the components of other comprehensive
income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
Tax Effect
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains arising during the period
|
|
$
|
898
|
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
$
|
593
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustments for net gains realized in net income
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities
|
|
$
|
903
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs and net actuarial gains/losses
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
947
|
|
|
$
|
322
|
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains arising during the period
|
|
$
|
1,459
|
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
|
$
|
963
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustments for net gains realized in net income
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
|
$
|
495
|
|
|
$
|
962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs and net actuarial gains/losses
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
1,545
|
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
Tax Effect
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses arising during the period
|
|
$
|
(2,544
|
)
|
|
$
|
(865
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,679
|
)
|
Less: reclassification adjustments for net gains realized in net income
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities
|
|
$
|
(2,839
|
)
|
|
$
|
(965
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs and net actuarial gains/losses
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,797
|
)
|
|
$
|
(951
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,846
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses arising during the period
|
|
$
|
(2,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(912
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,770
|
)
|
Less: reclassification adjustments for net gains realized in net income
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities
|
|
$
|
(3,035
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,032
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,003
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs and net actuarial gains/losses
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,950
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,003
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,947
|
)
|
NOTE 6 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The Company’s 2011 Equity Incentive
Plan, as amended (the “2011 Plan”), provides for the issuance of up to 900,000 shares in connection with incentive
and nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other equity-based awards. Prior to adoption of the
2011 Plan, the Company made equity-based awards under the Company’s 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, which expired January 1, 2011.
Stock Options
The 2011 Plan authorizes the issuance of
incentive and non-qualified stock options, as defined under current tax laws, to key personnel. Options granted under the 2011
Plan either become exercisable ratably over five years or in a single installment five years from the date of grant.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option
pricing model to calculate the fair value of stock option awards based on assumptions in the following table. Expected volatility
is based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The expected term of stock options granted is based on the
simplified method, which is the simple average between contractual term and vesting period. The risk-free rate is based on the
expected term of stock options and the applicable U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant.
Grant period ended
|
|
Expected
Life
|
|
Risk Free
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Expected
Volatility
|
|
|
Dividend
Yield
|
|
|
Average
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
|
|
23.38
|
%
|
|
|
3.15
|
%
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
|
|
23.04
|
%
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
A summary of stock option activity as of
June 30, 2014 and 2013, and changes during the six months then ended are presented below:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding beginning of period
|
|
|
625,495
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
6.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(70,400
|
)
|
|
|
15.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding end of period
|
|
|
557,595
|
|
|
$
|
8.80
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
226,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable end of period
|
|
|
294,795
|
|
|
$
|
11.45
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
$
|
45,192
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding beginning of period
|
|
|
537,107
|
|
|
$
|
11.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
182,500
|
|
|
|
5.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,275
|
)
|
|
|
7.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(51,467
|
)
|
|
|
10.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding end of period
|
|
|
666,865
|
|
|
$
|
9.60
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
117,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable end of period
|
|
|
338,890
|
|
|
$
|
13.26
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,439
|
|
A summary of the status of the Company’s
non-vested options as of June 30, 2014 and 2013 and changes during the six months then ended, are presented below:
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Fair Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested beginning of period
|
|
|
296,650
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
147,280
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
182,500
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(36,350
|
)
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested end of period
|
|
|
262,800
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
327,975
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
The Company accounts for stock based compensation
in accordance with GAAP, which requires measurement of compensation cost for all stock-based awards based on grant date fair value
and recognition of compensation cost over the service period of each award.
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2014
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
Tax Effect
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized compensation expense
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2013
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
Tax Effect
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized compensation expense
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2014
|
|
|
June 30,
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future compensation expense (1)
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) related to non-vested stock options
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
The Company grants restricted stock units
(“RSU”) to employees qualifying for awards under the Company’s Annual Incentive Compensation Plan. Recipients
of RSUs will be issued a specified number of shares of common stock under the 2011 Plan upon the lapse of applicable restrictions.
Outstanding RSUs are subject to forfeiture if the recipient’s employment terminates prior to the expiration of three years
from the date of grant.
The following table summarizes RSU activity
during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
terms (in years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2014
|
|
|
50,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
11,444
|
|
|
$
|
6.46
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested end of period
|
|
|
60,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
terms (in years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2013
|
|
|
16,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
31,150
|
|
|
$
|
4.84
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,284
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested end of period
|
|
|
45,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
The following table summarizes RSU compensation
expense during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
RSU compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2014
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
Tax Effect
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSU recognized compensation expense
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2013
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
Tax Effect
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSU recognized compensation expense
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2014
|
|
|
June 30,
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future compensation expense (1)
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) related to non-vested RSU's
|
|
NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary,
the Bank of the Pacific (the “Bank”), is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course
of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and
standby letters of credit, and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized on the consolidated
balance sheets.
The Bank’s exposure to credit loss
in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters
of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments
and conditional obligations as they do for on-balance-sheet instruments. A summary of the Bank’s off-balance sheet commitments
at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2014
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
99,656
|
|
|
$
|
106,017
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
$
|
1,733
|
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements
to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Many of the commitments expire
without being drawn upon; therefore total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates
each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon extension
of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable,
inventory, property and equipment, residential real estate, and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional
commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing
letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
In connection with certain loans held for
sale, the Bank typically makes representations and warranties that the underlying loans conform to specified guidelines. If the
underlying loans do not conform to the specifications, the Bank may have an obligation to repurchase the loans or indemnify the
purchaser against loss. The Bank believes that the potential for loss under these arrangements is remote. Accordingly, no contingent
liability is recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
The Company is currently not party to any
material pending litigation. However, because of the nature of its activities, the Company may be subject to or threatened with
legal actions in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, liabilities arising from these claims, if any,
will not have a material effect on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.
NOTE 8 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair Value Hierarchy
The Company uses an established hierarchy
for measuring fair value that is intended to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
This hierarchy uses three levels of inputs to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities as follows:
Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted
prices in active exchange markets for identical assets or liabilities; also includes certain corporate debt securities actively
traded in over-the-counter markets.
Level 2 – Valuations of assets and
liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities
traded in the same market; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model–derived
valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. Valuations may be obtained from, or corroborated
by, third-party pricing services. This category generally includes certain U.S. Government, agency and non-agency securities, state
and municipal securities, mortgage-backed securities, corporate securities, and residential mortgage loans held for sale.
Level 3 – Valuation based on unobservable
inputs supported by little or no market activity for financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted
cash flow methodologies, yield curves and similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value
requires significant management judgment or estimation. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining
the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities, but in all cases are corroborated by external data, which may include third-party
pricing services.
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
The Company uses an independent pricing
service to assist management in determining fair values of investment securities available-for-sale. This service provides pricing
information by utilizing evaluated pricing models supported with market based information. Standard inputs include benchmark yields,
reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, credit ratings, bids and offers, relative credit information and reference data from market
research publications. Investment securities that are deemed to have been trading in illiquid or inactive markets may require the
use of significant unobservable inputs.
The pricing service provides quoted market
prices when available. Quoted prices are not always available due to bond market inactivity. For securities where quoted prices
or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows. Discounted cash
flows are calculated using spread to swap and LIBOR curves that are updated to incorporate loss severities, volatility, credit
spread and optionality. Additionally, the pricing service may obtain a broker quote when sufficient information is not available
to produce a valuation. Valuations and broker quotes are non-binding and do not represent quotes on which one may execute the disposition
of the assets.
The Company generally obtains one value
from its primary external third-party pricing service. The Company’s third-party pricing service has established processes
for us to submit inquiries regarding quoted prices. The Company’s third-party pricing service will review the inputs to the
evaluation in light of any new market data presented by us. The Company’s third-party pricing service may then affirm the
original quoted price or may update the evaluation on a going forward basis.
On a quarterly basis, management reviews
the pricing information received from the third party-pricing service through a combination of procedures that include an evaluation
of methodologies used by the pricing service, analytical reviews and performance analyses of the prices against statistics and
trends and maintenance of an investment watch list. Based on this review, management determines whether the current placement of
the security in the fair value hierarchy is appropriate or whether transfers may be warranted. As necessary, the Company compares
prices received from the pricing service to discounted cash flow models or through performing independent valuations of inputs
and assumptions similar to those used by the pricing service in order to ensure prices represent a reasonable estimate of fair
value. Although the Company does identify differences from time to time as a result of these validation procedures, the Company
did not make any significant adjustments as of June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013.
The following table presents the balances
of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2014
|
|
Description
|
|
Fair Value
06/30/2014
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: agency issued
|
|
$
|
38,822
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
38,822
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: non agency
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: agency issued
|
|
|
11,919
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,919
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. Government agency securities
|
|
|
8,721
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,721
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
28,646
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27,252
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
88,712
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
87,318
|
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2013
|
|
Description
|
|
Fair Value
12/31/2013
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active
Markets for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: agency issued
|
|
$
|
38,791
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
38,791
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations: non agency
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: agency issued
|
|
|
13,389
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13,389
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. Government agency securities
|
|
|
8,811
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,811
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
32,160
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,741
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
96,144
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
94,725
|
|
|
$
|
1,419
|
|
As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013,
the Company had three investments classified as Level 3 investments which consist of local non-rated municipal bonds for which
the Company is the sole owner of the entire bond issue. The valuation of these securities is supported by analysis prepared by
an independent third party. Their approach to determining fair value involves using recently executed transactions and market quotations
for similar securities. As these securities are not rated by the rating agencies and there is no trading volume, management determined
that these securities should be classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Additionally, these securities are considered
sensitive to changes in credit given the unobserved assumed credit ratings.
The following table presents a reconciliation
of assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. There were no transfers of assets into or out of Level 1, 2 or 3 for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,401
|
|
|
$
|
1,614
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
$
|
1,614
|
|
Principal paydowns
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Change in FV (included in other comprehensive income)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance end of period
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
|
$
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
$
|
1,491
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring
Basis
Certain assets and liabilities are measured
at fair value on a nonrecurring basis after initial recognition such as loans measured for impairment and other real estate owned
(“OREO”). The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of each such class of financial instrument:
Impaired loans
– A loan is
considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all
amounts due (both interest and principal) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are classified
as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy and are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows or by the net
realizable value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. In determining the net realizable value of the underlying
collateral, we consider third party appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers, less estimated costs to sell. These appraisals may utilize
a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach.
Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal
process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available and include consideration
for variations in location, size, and income production capacity of the property. The income approach commonly utilizes a discount
or cap rate to determine the present value of expected future cash flows. Additionally, the appraisals are periodically further
adjusted by the Company in consideration of charges that may be incurred in the event of foreclosure and are based on management’s
historical knowledge, changes in business factors and changes in market conditions. Such discounts are typically significant, and
may range from 10% to 30%.
Impaired loans are reviewed and evaluated
quarterly for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly, based on the same factors identified above. Because of the high degree
of judgment required in estimating the fair value of collateral underlying impaired loans and because of the relationship between
fair value and general economic conditions, we consider the fair value of impaired loans to be highly sensitive to changes in market
conditions.
Other real estate owned
–
OREO is initially recorded at the fair value of the property less estimated costs to sell. This amount becomes the property’s
new basis. Management considers third party appraisals in determining the fair value of particular properties. These appraisals
may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach.
Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal
process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available and include consideration
for variations in location, size, and income production capacity of the property. Additionally, the appraisals are periodically
further adjusted by the Company based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in business factors and changes in market
conditions. Such discounts are typically significant, and may range from 10% to 25%.
Any write-downs based on the property fair
value less estimated costs to sell at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for credit losses. Management periodically
reviews OREO to ensure the property is carried at the lower of its new basis or fair value, net of estimated costs to sell. Any
additional write-downs based on re-evaluation of the property fair value are charged to non-interest expense. Because of the high
degree of judgment required in estimating the fair value of OREO and because of the relationship between fair value and general
economic conditions, we consider the fair value of OREO to be highly sensitive to changes in market conditions.
The following table presents the Company’s
assets that were held at the end of each period that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the six months
ended June 30, 2014 and year ended December 31, 2013:
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2014
|
|
Description
|
|
Fair Value
06/30/2014
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
Other Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
Loans measured for impairment, net of specific reserves
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Total impaired assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
555
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
555
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2013
|
|
Description
|
|
Fair Value
12/31/2013
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
Other Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,960
|
|
Loans measured for impairment, net of specific reserves
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Total impaired assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
2,122
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,122
|
|
Other real estate owned with a pre-foreclosure
loan balance of $317,000 was acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2014. Upon foreclosure, these assets did not have write
downs charged to the allowance for credit losses during the period.
The following table presents quantitative
information about Level 3 inputs for financial instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2014:
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Fair Value
06/30/2014
|
|
|
Valuation
Technique
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
Range
(Weighted
Average)
|
|
Other real estate owned and foreclosed assets
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
|
Appraised value
|
|
Adjustment for market conditions
|
|
|
0-10% (0.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans measured for impairment, net of specific reserves
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
Appraised value
|
|
Adjustment for market conditions
|
|
|
0-20% (1.1%)
|
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair values of financial instruments disclosed in
these consolidated financial statements:
Cash and due from
banks, Interest bearing deposits in banks, and Certificates held for investment
The carrying amounts of cash,
interest bearing deposits at other financial institutions approximate their fair value.
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
and Held-to-Maturity
The fair value of all investment
securities are based upon the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the security. Such assumptions include observable
and unobservable inputs such as quoted market prices, dealer quotes and analysis of discounted cash flows.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
FHLB stock is carried at cost
which approximates fair value and equals its par value because the shares can only be redeemed with the FHLB at par.
Loans, net and Loans held
for sale
The fair value of loans is estimated
based on comparable market statistics for loans with similar credit ratings. An additional liquidity discount is also incorporated
to more closely align the fair value with observed market prices. Fair values of loans held for sale are based on a discounted
cash flow calculation using interest rates currently available on similar loans. The fair value was based on an aggregate loan
basis.
Deposits
The fair value of deposits with
no stated maturity date is included at the amount payable on demand. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated
using a discounted cash flow calculation based on interest rates currently offered on similar certificates.
Short-term borrowings
The fair values of the Company’s
short-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rates
for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Long-term borrowings
The fair values of the Company’s
long-term borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rates
for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Junior subordinated debentures
The fair value of the junior
subordinated debentures and trust preferred securities is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on interest rates
currently available for junior subordinated debentures.
Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments
The fair value of commitments
to extend credit and standby letters of credit was estimated using the rates currently charged to enter into similar agreements,
taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the customers. Since the majority
of the Company’s off-balance-sheet instruments consist of non-fee producing, variable-rate commitments, the Company has determined
they do not have a material fair value.
The estimated fair value of the Company’s
financial instruments at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is as follows:
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
Total Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
17,694
|
|
|
$
|
17,694
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
17,694
|
|
Interest-bearing certificates of deposit (original maturities greater than 90 days)
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
88,712
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
87,318
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
88,712
|
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
2,956
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,956
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,956
|
|
Loans held-for-sale
|
|
|
7,632
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,632
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,632
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
538,968
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
512,233
|
|
|
|
512,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
619,301
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
620,909
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
620,909
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,172
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,172
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
13,403
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,683
|
|
|
|
7,683
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
|
|
|
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
Total Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
35,948
|
|
|
$
|
35,948
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
35,948
|
|
Interest-bearing certificates of deposit (original maturities greater than 90 days)
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
Investment securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
96,144
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
94,725
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
96,144
|
|
Investment securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
Loans held-for-sale
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
496,307
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
473,224
|
|
|
|
473,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
607,347
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
606,654
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
606,654
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,195
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,195
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
13,403
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,646
|
|
|
|
7,646
|
|
NOTE 9 – JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
At June 30, 2014, two wholly-owned subsidiary
grantor trusts established by the Company had outstanding $13.0 million of Trust Preferred Securities (“trust preferred securities”).
Trust preferred securities accrue and pay distributions periodically at specified annual rates as provided in the indentures. The
trusts used the net proceeds from the offering of trust preferred securities to purchase a like amount of Junior Subordinated Debentures
(the “Debentures”) of the Company. The Debentures are the sole assets of the trusts. The Company’s obligations
under the Debentures and the related documents, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of
the obligations of the trusts. The trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon the maturity of the Debentures, or
upon earlier redemption as provided in the indentures. The Company has the right to redeem the Debentures in whole or in part,
at a redemption price specified in the indentures plus any accrued but unpaid interest to the redemption date.
The Debentures issued by the Company to
the grantor trusts totaling $13.0 million are reflected in the consolidated balance sheet in the liabilities section under the
caption “junior subordinated debentures.” The Company records interest expense on the corresponding junior subordinated
debentures in the consolidated statements of income. The Company recorded $403,000 in the consolidated balance sheet at June 30,
2014 for the common capital securities issued by the issuer trusts.
As of June 30, 2014, regular accrued interest
on junior subordinated debentures totaled $39,000 and is included in accrued interest payable on the balance sheet.
Following are the terms of the junior subordinated
debentures as of June 30, 2014.
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Trust Name
|
|
Issue Date
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Financial Corporation Statutory Trust I
|
|
December 2005
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 1.45%
(1)
|
|
|
|
March 2036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Financial Corporation Statutory Trust II
|
|
June 2006
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 1.60%
(2)
|
|
|
|
July 2036
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Pacific Financial Corporation Statutory Trust
I securities incurred interest at the fixed rate of 6.39% until mid March 2011, at which the rate changed to a variable rate of
3-month LIBOR (0.231% at June 16, 2014) plus 1.45% or 1.68%, adjusted quarterly, through the final maturity date in March 2036.
(2)
Pacific Financial Corporation Statutory Trust
II securities incur interest at a variable rate of 3-month LIBOR (0.226% at April 14, 2014) plus 1.60% or 1.83%, adjusted quarterly,
through the final maturity date in July 2036.
NOTE 10 – RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(ASU 2014-09), which supersedes nearly all existing
revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or
services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for
those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment
and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. The standard is
effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition
methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option
to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09
recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures). We are currently evaluating the impact of
our pending adoption of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial statements and have not yet determined the method by which we
will adopt the standard in 2017.
In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11,
"
Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit
Carryforward Exists.
" The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion
thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or
a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 has not had a material impact on the Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE 11 – BUSINESS COMBINATION
On January 28, 2013, the Bank and Sterling
Savings Bank, a Washington state-chartered bank (“Sterling”), entered into a Purchase and Assumption Agreement (the
“Agreement”) pursuant to which the Bank agreed to purchase from Sterling three branches located in Aberdeen, Washington;
Astoria, Oregon; and Seaside, Oregon; including certain deposit liabilities, loans and other assets and liabilities associated
with such branch locations. The actual amount of loans and deposits, the value of other assets and liabilities transferred
to the Bank and the actual price paid were determined at the time of the closing of the transaction on June 1, 2013, in accordance
with the terms of the Agreement. The purchase price was $976,000 and exceeded the estimated fair value of tangible net assets
acquired by approximately $1.1 million, which was recorded as goodwill and intangible assets.
Cash flow information relative to the agreement is as follows (in thousands):
Fair value of tangible net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
37,533
|
|
Cash paid for deposit premium
|
|
|
(976
|
)
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(37,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets recorded
|
|
$
|
1,127
|
|
The primary purposes of the acquisition
are to expand the Company’s market share in the northern Oregon coast, to provide existing customers with added convenience
and service, and to provide our new customers with the opportunity to enjoy the outstanding personalized service and commitment
of our community-based bank.
Fair value adjustments and related goodwill
were recorded in the statement of financial condition of the Company. The following is a condensed balance sheet disclosing
the estimated fair value amounts of the acquired branches of Sterling assigned to the major consolidated asset and liability captions
at the acquisition date (in thousands):
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
31,941
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
3,989
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
604
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
37,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits and accrued interest payable
|
|
$
|
37,636
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
47
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
37,684
|
|
The core deposit intangible asset that
was recognized as part of the business combination was $242,000 and will be amortized over its estimated useful life of approximately
ten years utilizing an accelerated method. The goodwill of $885,000 will not be amortized for financial statement purposes; instead,
it will be reviewed annually for impairment.
The fair value of savings and transaction
deposit accounts acquired from Sterling was assumed to approximate the carrying value as these accounts have no stated maturity
and are payable on demand. Certificates of deposit were valued by comparing the contractual cost of the portfolio to
an identical portfolio bearing current market rates. The projected cash flows from maturing certificates were calculated
based on contractual rates. The fair value of certificates of deposit was calculated by discounting their contractual
cash flows at a market rate for a certificate of deposit with a corresponding maturity.
Direct costs related to the Sterling acquisition
were expensed as incurred in the year ended December 31, 2013. These acquisition and integration expenses included salaries
and benefits, technology and communications, occupancy and equipment, professional services and other noninterest expenses. For
the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company incurred $615,000 of expenses related to acquisition costs.
NOTE 12 – GOODWILL
The majority of goodwill and intangibles
generally arise from business combinations accounted for under the purchase method. Goodwill and other intangibles deemed
to have indefinite lives generated from purchase business combinations are not subject to amortization and are instead tested for
impairment no less than annually.
During the second quarter of 2014, the
Company initiated its annual goodwill impairment test to determine whether an impairment of its goodwill asset exists. The test
was completed during the current quarter. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step is
a comparison of the reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. If the reporting unit’s fair value is less than
its carrying value, the Company is required to progress to the second step. In the second step the Company calculates the implied
fair value of its reporting unit and, in accordance with applicable GAAP standards, compares the implied fair value of goodwill
to the carrying amount of goodwill on the Company’s balance sheet. If the carrying amount of the goodwill is greater
than the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss must be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The
implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as goodwill recognized in a business combination. The
estimated fair value of the Company is allocated to all of the Company’s individual assets and liabilities, including any
unrecognized identifiable intangible assets, as if the Company had been acquired in a business combination and the estimated fair
value of the Company is the price paid to acquire it. The allocation process is performed only for purposes of determining whether
a goodwill impairment exists and the amount of any such impairment. No assets or liabilities are written up or down, nor are any
additional unrecognized identifiable intangible assets recorded as a part of this process.
The Company estimates fair value using
the best information available, including market information and a discounted cash flow analysis, which is also referred to as
the income approach. The income approach uses a reporting unit’s projection of estimated operating results and cash flows
that is discounted using a rate that reflects current market conditions. The projection uses management’s best estimates
of economic and market conditions over the projected period including growth rates in loans and deposits, estimates of future expected
changes in net interest margins and cash expenditures. The market approach estimates fair value by applying cash flow multiples
to the reporting unit’s operating performance. The multiples are derived from comparable publicly traded companies with similar
operating and investment characteristics of the reporting unit. We validate our estimated fair value by comparing the fair value
estimates using the income approach to the fair value estimates using the market approach.
As part of our process for performing the
step one impairment test of goodwill, the Company estimated the fair value of the reporting unit utilizing the income approach
and the market approach in order to derive an enterprise value of the Company. In determining the discount rate for the discounted
cash flow model, the Company used a modified capital asset pricing model that develops a rate of return utilizing a risk-free rate
and equity risk premium resulting in a discount rate of 12.0%. This approach also includes adjustments for the industry the Company
operates in and size of the Company. In addition, assumptions used by the Company in its discounted cash flow model (income approach)
included an average annual revenue growth rate that approximated 23%; an asset growth of 4.4% in years one through five; net interest
margin ranging from 4.02% in the base year to 4.24% in year five; and a return on assets that ranged from 0.62% to 1.24%.
In applying the market approach method,
the Company considered all banks that announced a sale between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2014, with total assets under $5 billion
and a return on assets greater than zero. This resulted in selecting 24 institutions which fit these criteria. After selecting
these institutions, the Company derived the fair value of the reporting unit by completing a comparative analysis of the relationship
between their financial metrics listed above and their market values utilizing various market multiples. Focus was placed
on the price to tangible book value of equity multiple as this multiple generally reflects returns on the capital employed within
the industry and is generally correlated with the profitability of each individual company.
The Company concluded its reporting unit
had a fair value of $8.50 per share, or $86.6 million, after giving similar consideration to the values derived from 1) the market
approach of $8.20 per share weighted at 80%, and 2) the income approach of $9.67 per share million weighted at 20%. This estimate
compares to a carrying value of its reporting unit of $70.9 million. Accordingly, following step one of the Company’s goodwill
impairment test, the Company concluded that its reporting unit’s fair value exceeded its carrying value and no goodwill impairment
existed.
Even though the Company determined that
there was no goodwill impairment, a future impairment charge may be necessary if our stock price declines, market values of others
in the financial industry decrease, the Bank’s revenue falls, or there are significant adverse changes in the operating environment
for the financial industry. It is also possible that changes in circumstances existing now or in the future, or in the numerous
estimates, judgments, and assumptions made by management in assessing the fair value of our goodwill, could result in a future
goodwill impairment. If the Company records an impairment charge, its financial position and results of operations would be adversely
affected; however, such an impairment charge would have no impact on liquidity, day-to-day operations or regulatory capital.