VANCOUVER, BC, Dec. 29,
2023 /CNW/ - Rokmaster Resources Corp.
(TSXV: RKR) (OTCQB: RKMSF) (FSE: 1RR1) ("Rokmaster" or the
"Company") is pleased to announce positive results from the
Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") completed by Ausenco
Engineering Canada ULC ("Ausenco"), supported by Mining Plus Canada
Consulting Ltd.("Mining Plus"), Knight Piésold Ltd.("KP"), P&E
Mining Consultants Inc. ("P&E"), and Canenco Consulting
Corp.("Canenco"), for the Revel Ridge polymetallic gold-silver
Project ("Revel Ridge" or the "Project") located in the
Revelstoke area of southeastern
British Columbia.
The PEA demonstrates the Revel Ridge Project's ability to become
a long life and robust polymetallic gold-silver mine with strong
project economics at US$1,850/ounce
gold, while today's spot price is over US$2,000 per ounce. In addition to the PEA, Revel
Ridge has upside potential to expand current Mineral Resources
through ongoing exploration diamond drilling, both down dips, along
on-strike and on other occurrences.
A National Instrument ("NI") 43-101 Technical Report summarizing
the PEA will be filed on SEDAR+. Amounts stated are in Q4
2023 Canadian dollars (C$).
Revel Ridge 2023 PEA Highlights
Include:
- High-grade underground mine with mineralized
material1 averaging C$361/t NSR value (diluted) comprising Main Zone
with 11.43 Mt averaging 3.80 g/t Au, 37.37 g/t Ag, 2.34 % Zn, 1.30
% Pb (diluted) and Yellowjacket Zone 0.34 Mt averaging 8.61% Zn,
2.66% Pb, 65.0 g/t Ag and 0.07 g/t Au (diluted).
- After-tax NPV5.0% of C$454M and
21.1% IRR at US$1,850/oz Au,
US$23.00/oz Ag, US$1.26/lb Zn, and US$0.90/lb Pb.
- After-tax payback period of 3.2 years discounted at 5.0%.
- Pre-production capital expenditures ("CAPEX") of C$588M (US$436M2) including contingency of
C$84M (US$62M2).
- After-tax NPV5.0%: CAPEX Ratio of 0.77:1.
- Life of mine ("LOM") average annual payable production of 158
koz AuEq per year (114 koz Au per year, 940 koz Ag, 32.6 mlbs Zn,
19.6 mlbs Pb) over a production lifespan of 11.4 years.
- LOM cash costs3 of US$540/oz payable Au on a by-product basis, LOM
all-in sustaining costs ("AISC"4) of US$836/oz payable Au on a by-product basis.
- 2,920 tonne per day ("t/d") crush and particle
sort-mill-flotation-POX & gold plant producing gold/silver doré
and saleable zinc and lead concentrates.
1. Underground mineralized
material contains Measured, Indicated and Inferred
Resources.
|
2. Exchange Rate (C$/US$) of
0.74
|
3. Cash costs are inclusive
of mining costs, processing costs, site G&A, treatment, and
refining costs, and transportation costs.
|
4. AISC includes cash costs
plus estimated sustaining capital, royalties, and closure costs and
less salvage value.
|
5. Payable Gold Equivalent
(AuEq) calculated by dividing gross sales revenue by
$1,850.
|
PEA Overview
The 2023 Revel Ridge PEA considers an underground mine with
on-site treatment of the mined material by particle sorting
followed by conventional milling, and flotation to produce separate
lead and zinc concentrates for sale to third-party smelters, in
combination with on-site treatment of refractory gold concentrates
to produce gold-silver doré. The mine will comprise an
owner-operated, ramp developed, long hole stope underground
mine.
The processing capacity of 2,920 tonnes per day will result in a
production lifespan of 11.4 years. An additional 18 months of mine
ramp access and development, and construction of the process plant
and filtered waste management facility (filtered tailings and
filtered residues) is planned prior to the project becoming fully
operational in Year 1. The PEA leverages Revel Ridge's existing
infrastructure, including all-weather access roads, 3 km of
underground development, permitted waste rock storage facility,
full camp facility and approximately 15 km from the BC Hydro
electrical system and the City of
Revelstoke with its skilled labor pool.
The PEA is derived using the Company's NI 43-101 Mineral
Resource Estimate (June 06, 2023).
The effective date of the PEA is December
29, 2023, and a Technical Report will be filed on the
Company's website and SEDAR+ within 45 days of this disclosure.
Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have
demonstrated economic viability. The PEA is preliminary in nature
and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are too speculative to
have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them
to be categorized as Mineral Reserves. There is no certainty that
PEA results will be realized.
Economic Analysis
The economic analysis was performed assuming a 5% discount rate.
Cash flows have been discounted to the start of construction,
assuming that the project execution decision will be taken, and
major project financing will be carried out at this time.
On a post-tax basis, the NPV discounted at 5% is C$ 454 M; the IRR is 21.1%; and payback period is
3.2 years. A summary of the project economics is shown in Table
1.
Table 1:
Revel Ridge 2023 PEA Detailed
Parameters and Outputs
General
|
LOM Total / Avg
|
Lead Price
(US$/lb)
|
0.90
|
Zinc Price
(US$/lb)
|
1.26
|
Gold Price
(US$/oz)
|
1,850
|
Silver Price
(US$/oz)
|
23.00
|
Mine Life
(Years)
|
11.4
|
Total Processed Feed
Tonnes (kt)
|
11,772
|
Total Waste Tonnes
(kt)
|
4,113
|
Production
|
LOM Total / Avg
|
Head Grade – Pb
(%)
|
1.34
|
Head Grade – Zn
(%)
|
2.52
|
Head Grade – Au
(g/t)
|
3.69
|
Head Grade – Ag
(g/t)
|
38.18
|
Recovery Rate – Pb (%)
to saleable Pb Concentrate
|
68.4
|
Recovery Rate – Zn (%)
to saleable Zn Concentrate
|
66.8
|
Recovery Rate – Au (%)
to saleable Pb Concentrate
|
13.8
|
Recovery Rate – Ag (%)
to saleable Pb Concentrate
|
36.5
|
Recovery Rate – Au (%)
to saleable Zn Concentrate
|
0.4
|
Recovery Rate – Ag (%)
to saleable Zn Concentrate
|
5.8
|
Recovery Rate – Au (%)
to doré
|
80.4
|
Recovery Rate – Ag (%)
to doré
|
41.7
|
Total Metal Payable –
Pb (m lbs)
|
224
|
Total Metal Payable –
Zn (m lbs)
|
372
|
Total Metal Payable –
Au (koz)
|
1,300
|
Total Metal Payable –
Ag (koz)
|
10,716
|
Average Annual Payable
Production – Pb (m lbs)
|
20
|
Average Annual Payable
Production – Zn (m lbs)
|
33
|
Average Annual Payable
Production – Au (koz)
|
114
|
Average Annual Payable
Production – Ag (koz)
|
940
|
Operating Costs
|
LOM Total / Avg
|
Mining Cost (C$/t
Processed)
|
82.67
|
Processing Cost (C$/t
Processed)
|
70.76
|
G&A Cost (C$/t
Processed)
|
3.53
|
Total Operating Costs
(C$/t Processed)
|
156.97
|
Cash Costs (By-Product
Basis) (C$/oz Au)*
|
540.2
|
AISC (By-Product Basis)
($/oz Au)**
|
836.1
|
Capital Costs
|
LOM Total / Avg
|
Initial Capital
(C$M)
|
588
|
Sustaining Capital
(C$M)
|
486
|
Closure Capital
(C$M)
|
76
|
Salvage Value
(C$M)
|
42
|
Financials
|
Pre-Tax
|
NPV (5%)
(C$M)
|
751
|
IRR (%)
|
29.0
|
Payback
(Years)
|
2.6
|
Financials
|
Post-Tax
|
NPV (5%)
(C$M)
|
454
|
IRR (%)
|
21.1
|
Payback
(Years)
|
3.2
|
*Cash Costs includes
mining costs, processing costs, site G&A, treatment and
refining costs, and transportation costs.
|
**AISC includes cash
costs cash costs plus sustaining capital, royalties, and closure
costs and less salvage value.
|
Sensitivities
NPV5.0 remains positive for changes of 25% in revenue
drivers (commodity prices, grade, and recovery), capital
expenditure or operating costs. After-tax economic sensitivities to
commodity prices are presented in Table 2 illustrating the effects
of varying gold price as compared to the base-case. Additional
Project sensitivities will be presented in the Technical
Report.
Table 2:
After-Tax NPV and IRR
Sensitivities to Commodity Prices
|
Lower Case
|
Base Case
|
Higher Case
|
Gold Price
(US$/oz)
|
1,700
|
1,850
|
2,000
|
After-Tax NPV
(5.0%) (C$M)
|
334
|
454
|
574
|
After-Tax NPV (8.0%)
(C$M)
|
218
|
319
|
419
|
After-Tax NPV (10.0%)
(C$M)
|
157
|
247
|
336
|
After-Tax IRR
(%)
|
17.3
|
21.1
|
24.7
|
After-Tax Payback
(Years)
|
3.7
|
3.2
|
2.9
|
Revel Ridge Mineral Resource
Estimate
The Company's current
Mineral Resource Estimate
(MRE; effective date of June 6, 2023) completed
by P&E Mining Consultants Inc. forms the basis for this PEA.
The MRE includes drilling results from the Company's 2020-2022
exploration diamond drill programs.
Table
3:
Mineral Resources Reported at CAD $110/t NSR Cut-Off (effective
date June 6, 2023)
Classification
|
Tonnes
(kt)
|
AuEq
(g/t)
|
AuEq
(koz)
|
AgEq
(g/t)
|
AgEq
(koz)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Pb
(%)
|
Zn
(%)
|
Measured &
Indicated
|
7,156.2
|
6.63
|
1,526.0
|
691.9
|
159,198.9
|
4.14
|
51.2
|
1.96
|
4.19
|
Inferred
|
7,563.9
|
6.11
|
1,486.0
|
621.7
|
151,188.8
|
4.42
|
48.9
|
1.48
|
2.62
|
Notes:
1)
|
Mineral Resources
are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic
viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially
affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation,
socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues
|
2)
|
The Inferred Mineral
Resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence than that
applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted
to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority
of the Inferred Mineral Resource could be upgraded to an Indicated
Mineral Resource with continued exploration, however there is no
certainty an upgrade to the Inferred Mineral Resource would occur
or what proportion would be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral
Resource
|
3)
|
The Mineral
Resources in this estimate were calculated using the Canadian
Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Standards on
Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines (2014)
prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and
adopted by CIM Council and CIM Best Practices Guidelines
(2019)
|
4)
|
The following
parameters were used to derive the NSR block model C$/tonne cut-off
values used to define the Mineral Resource:
|
|
• March 2023
Consensus Economics long term forecast metal prices of Au
US$1,750/oz, Ag US$22/oz,
Pb US$0.95/lb, Zn US$1.26/lb
|
|
• Exchange
rate of US$0.74 = C$1.00
|
|
• Main Zone
process recoveries of Au 96%, Ag 85%, Pb 71%, Zn 70%
|
|
• Yellowjacket
Zone process recoveries of Au 86%, Ag 94%, Pb 88%, Zn
93%
|
|
• Main
Deformation Zones (MDZ) AuEq = Au g/t + (Ag g/t x 0.010) + (Pb% x
0.265) + (Zn% x 0.314); MDZ AgEq = Ag g/t + (Au g/t x 101.478) +
(Pb% x 26.933) + (Zn% x 31.847); Revel Ridge
Yellowjacket Zone (RRYZ) AuEq = Au g/t + (Ag g/t x 0.008) + (Pb% x
0.310) + (Zn% x 0.457); RRYZ AgEq = Ag g/t + (Pb% x
40.588) + (Zn% x
59.737)
|
|
• Mineral
Resources have been reported using a NSR cut-off of C$110/t. The
NSR cut-off was derived from $75/t mining, $25/t processing
and $10/t G&A
|
5)
|
Totals may not sum
due to rounding
|
Table
4:
The Mineral Resource Estimates for each of the five mineralized
zones at Revel Ridge
Classification
|
Cut-off
NSR
(C$/t)
|
Tonnes
(kt)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Ag
(koz)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Au
(koz)
|
Pb
(%)
|
Zn
(%)
|
NSR
(C$/t)
|
AuEq
(g/t)
|
AuEq
(koz)
|
AgEq
(g/t)
|
AgEq
(koz)
|
Totals for All
Mineralized Zones
|
Measured
|
110
|
1,916.5
|
58.6
|
3,611.6
|
5.49
|
338.5
|
2.05
|
4.01
|
544
|
7.88
|
485.6
|
799.0
|
49,231.4
|
Indicated
|
110
|
5,239.7
|
48.5
|
8,168.8
|
3.64
|
613.9
|
1.93
|
4.25
|
409
|
6.18
|
1,040.3
|
652.8
|
109,967.5
|
Meas &
Ind
|
110
|
7,156.2
|
51.2
|
11,780.4
|
4.14
|
952.4
|
1.96
|
4.18
|
445
|
6.63
|
1,526.0
|
691.9
|
159,198.9
|
Inferred
|
110
|
7,563.9
|
46.9
|
11,414.3
|
4.42
|
1,075.1
|
1.48
|
2.62
|
417
|
6.11
|
1,486.7
|
621.7
|
151,188.8
|
Totals For Revel
Ridge Main Zone
|
Measured
|
110
|
1,550.1
|
63.6
|
3,171.4
|
5.89
|
293.6
|
2.25
|
4.25
|
585
|
8.46
|
421.5
|
857.4
|
42,730.1
|
Indicated
|
110
|
2,922.4
|
49.6
|
4,662.5
|
4.97
|
466.6
|
2.02
|
3.60
|
491
|
7.13
|
669.8
|
722.7
|
67,902.9
|
Meas &
Ind
|
110
|
4,472.6
|
54.5
|
7,833.8
|
5.29
|
760.3
|
2.10
|
3.83
|
523
|
7.59
|
1,091.3
|
769.4
|
110,663.0
|
Inferred
|
110
|
5,689.1
|
49.1
|
8,975.5
|
4.94
|
903.3
|
1.66
|
2.93
|
466
|
6.79
|
1,241.6
|
688.1
|
125,859.5
|
Totals For Revel
Ridge Footwall Zone
|
Measured
|
110
|
196.1
|
33.8
|
212.8
|
5.08
|
32.0
|
0.95
|
1.78
|
427
|
6.23
|
39.3
|
631.4
|
3,980.8
|
Indicated
|
110
|
846.5
|
28.8
|
785.0
|
4.01
|
109.1
|
0.74
|
1.11
|
328
|
4.84
|
131.8
|
491.0
|
13,362.9
|
Meas &
Ind
|
110
|
1,042.5
|
29.8
|
997.9
|
4.21
|
141.1
|
0.78
|
1.24
|
347
|
5.10
|
171.0
|
517.4
|
17,343.7
|
Inferred
|
110
|
704.7
|
21.5
|
488.2
|
3.96
|
89.7
|
0.53
|
1.00
|
313
|
4.63
|
104.9
|
469.5
|
10,637.3
|
Totals For Revel
Ridge Yellowjacket Zones
|
Measured
|
110
|
0.5
|
48.0
|
0.8
|
0.11
|
0
|
1.89
|
3.99
|
122
|
2.79
|
0
|
363.1
|
5.8
|
Indicated
|
110
|
887.4
|
62.9
|
1794.1
|
0.10
|
2.9
|
2.65
|
9.08
|
289
|
5.47
|
156.2
|
712.8
|
20,336.6
|
Meas &
Ind
|
110
|
887.9
|
62.9
|
1795.0
|
0.10
|
2.9
|
2.65
|
9.07
|
289
|
5.47
|
156.2
|
712.6
|
20,342.4
|
Inferred
|
110
|
132.6
|
126.3
|
538.8
|
0.04
|
0.2
|
2.43
|
4.96
|
198
|
4.03
|
17.2
|
521.5
|
2,223.3
|
Totals For Revel
Ridge Hanging Wall Zone
|
Measured
|
110
|
169.7
|
41.5
|
226.6
|
2.35
|
12.8
|
1.53
|
4.37
|
307
|
4.55
|
24.8
|
460.9
|
2,514.7
|
Indicated
|
110
|
583.5
|
49.4
|
927.1
|
1.88
|
35.3
|
2.09
|
4.69
|
296
|
4.40
|
82.6
|
445.9
|
8,365.1
|
Meas &
Ind
|
110
|
753.2
|
47.6
|
1,153.7
|
1.99
|
48.1
|
1.96
|
4.62
|
299
|
4.43
|
107.4
|
449.3
|
10,879.8
|
Inferred
|
110
|
575.1
|
44.8
|
827.6
|
1.67
|
30.9
|
1.51
|
3.10
|
232
|
3.49
|
64.6
|
353.7
|
6,539.9
|
Totals For Revel
Ridge Main Zone Extension
|
Inferred
|
110
|
462.4
|
39.3
|
584.1
|
3.44
|
51.1
|
0.36
|
0.04
|
263
|
3.94
|
58.5
|
398.8
|
5,928.8
|
Mining Overview
An underground mining scenario is the basis for this PEA. The
owner-operated and leased mining fleet will utilize conventional
trackless haulage and long-hole stoping with backfill using
cemented process tailings (paste), cemented rockfill and waste
rock.
The mine designs and scheduling were engineered to provide 1,066
kt per year of mineralization to the 2,920 t/d process plant. A
total of 11.77 Mt of diluted mill feed, including Inferred
material, and comprising of Main Zone mineralisation with 11.43 Mt
averaging 3.80 g/t Au, 37.37 g/t Ag, 2.34 % Zn, 1.30 % Pb (diluted)
and Yellowjacket Zone mineralisation of 0.34 MT averaging 8.61% Zn,
2.66% Pb, 65.04 g/t Ag and 0.07 g/t Au (diluted) is expected to be
processed over the life of mine. Mill feed will be trucked to the
process facility located proximal to the main portal. Waste rock
that cannot be accommodated within the mine as backfill will be
stored together with dry-stack tailings or in a separated facility
constructed adjacent to the process plant. Underground mining
dilution has been accounted for in the minimum 2.0 m width of stope shapes, with an additional
allowance for overbreak. Total dilution in the delivered mill feed
is estimated at 35.4% (4.17 Mt).
Metallurgical
Optimizations
To support this PEA, metallurgical test work was supervised by
Canenco Consulting Corp. and flowsheet development test work was
undertaken at Base Metallurgical Laboratories Ltd. using samples
from the Main Deformation Zone (MDZ). The recent metallurgical
programs have focused on sensor based sorting, optimizing sulphide
flotation, impurity depression, assessment of onsite limestone as a
reagent, maximizing pressure oxidation and leaching recovery
resulting in a process flowsheet that has improved overall
extraction.
Based on the envisioned circuit and corresponding laboratory
test response, the overall process recoveries based on the samples
tested for the Main Zone mineralization were expected to be in the
range of 94-96% Au, 84-85% Ag,
71-73% Pb and 70-74% Zn. The Yellowjacket mineralization is less
complex metallurgically than the Main Zone mineralization and
responds to standard sequential flotation. Based on the
metallurgical studies undertaken in 2014, the overall process
recoveries for the Yellowjacket zone were expected to be 86% Au,
94% Ag, 88% Pb, and 93% Zn.
Processing Overview
Run-of-mine ("ROM") material is crushed and screened before
particle sorting to remove gangue. The beneficiated material
reports to the milling and flotation circuits where lead and zinc
sulphide concentrates are produced and dewatered for sale while the
refractory sulphides are collected and treated by pressure
oxidation ("POX") to facilitate extraction and recovery of gold and
silver by cyanide leach - Merrill Crowe process and refining to
doré bars.
Concentrate Marketing
Studies
Multiple marketing assessments have been completed to support
this PEA which indicate that Revel Ridge zinc and lead-silver-gold
concentrates are saleable.
Capital and Operating
Costs
The capital cost estimate conforms to Class 5 guidelines for a
PEA-level estimate accuracy set out by the Association for the
Advancement of Cost Engineering International ("AACE") with an
estimated accuracy of +50%/-30%. The operating cost estimates were
developed from first principles and benchmarking and applied to the
mine production schedule.
The capital and operating cost estimate was developed in Q4
2023 Canadian dollars (C$). The
capital cost summary is presented in Table 5 and the operating cost
summary is presented in Table 6.
WBS
|
WBS Description
|
Initial Capital Cost
(C$M)
|
Sustaining Capital
Cost (C$M)
|
Total Cost (C$M)
|
1000
|
Mining
|
89.4
|
372.1
|
461.4
|
2000
|
Process
Plant
|
280.1
|
0.0
|
280.1
|
3000
|
Additional
Facilities
|
10.4
|
66.9
|
77.3
|
4000
|
On-Site
Infrastructure
|
19.5
|
0.0
|
19.5
|
5000
|
Off-Site
Infrastructure
|
10.0
|
0.0
|
10.0
|
|
Total
Directs
|
409.5
|
439.0
|
848.4
|
6000
|
Project
Indirects
|
13.2
|
2.1
|
15.3
|
7000
|
Project
Delivery
|
61.2
|
7.3
|
68.5
|
8000
|
Owner's Cost
|
20.5
|
0.0
|
20.5
|
|
Total
Indirects
|
94.9
|
9.5
|
104.3
|
9000
|
Provisions
(Contingency)
|
84.0
|
37.2
|
121.1
|
|
Closure (Incl.
Contingency)
|
|
|
|
|
Project
Totals
|
588.3
|
485.6
|
1,149.6
|
Table 6: Project
Operating Cost Estimates (C$M) (totals may differ due to
rounding):
|
Cost Area
|
Average Annual Costs (C$M)
|
C$/t Processed
|
Mining
|
85.4
|
82.67
|
Process
|
73.1
|
70.76
|
G&A
|
3.65
|
3.53
|
Total
|
162.1
|
156.97
|
Environmental and Permitting
Considerations
Revel Ridge represents an existing exploration site with
existing permits for mine discharge and waste disposal. The site
has been maintained in good standing and environmental monitoring
has been ongoing during operations and since the site was last
active in 2012. There is a database of environmental information
for the site and region spanning almost 30 years. To accommodate
the mine design contemplated by the PEA, updated baseline data and
an environmental assessment and mine permits will be required. The
Company is currently performing an analysis of existing
environmental data to identify additional data needs with the
intent of carrying out environmental baseline studies to advance
the environmental assessment and permitting processes.
Conclusion and
Recommendations
The 2023 PEA demonstrates that Revel Ridge has the potential to
become a commercially robust project. Additional opportunities and
next steps include:
- Continued exploration and infill drilling for conversion of
Inferred Mineral Resources to the Measured and Indicated
categories.
- Mine scheduling investigations allowing for the further
optimization of blending scenarios.
- Supplementary metallurgical optimizations including
deposit-wide variability testing and host rock limestone
quality.
- Optimization of the particle sorting process, flotation
recovery and concentrate quality as well as the leach-Merrill Crowe
process.
- Analyses and environmental baseline studies to support
expedited permitting.
- Further optimization of waste and water management
infrastructure, including surface geotechnical site investigations,
laboratory testing, physical waste characterization, water balance
modelling, and engineering studies.
Qualified Persons
A team of independent Qualified Persons ("QP") (as such term is
defined under NI 43-101) at Ausenco, P&E Mining Consultants
Inc., Mining Plus, Canenco and KP have led the PEA and have
reviewed and verified the technical disclosure in this press
release, including:
- Kevin Murray, P.Eng., of Ausenco
is an independent QP for process and infrastructure capital and
operating cost estimation and project financials.
- Scott Weston, P.Geo., of Ausenco
is an independent QP for the environmental and permitting
studies.
- Eugene Puritch, P.Eng., FEC,
CET., of P&E Mining Consultants Inc. is an independent QP for
the geology and Mineral Resource Estimate.
- Evan Verkade, P.Eng., of Mining
Plus is an independent QP for the mine planning and cost
estimation.
- Stacy Freudigmann, P.Eng.,
F.Aus.IMM., of Canenco is an independent QP for metallurgical test
work and recovery model.
- Wilson Muir, P.Eng. of Knight
Piesold is an independent QP for the tailings and waste rock
management facility.
About the Company and
Project
Rokmaster's flagship Revel Ridge Project is host to a high-grade
gold and polymetallic orogenic sulphide deposit which has been the
subject of the PEA with an effective date of December 29, 2023, and an Updated Mineral
Resource Estimate1 on the Revel Ridge Property with an
effective date of June 6, 2023. The
2023 Mineral Resource Estimate remains open in all directions and
occupies approximately 2.0 km of the total 5.7 km strike length of
the Main Deformation Zone (MDZ) as defined by geological mapping,
drilling, and geochemistry.
- Measured & Indicated (M&I): 1.53 million gold
equivalent ("AuEq") Measured & Indicated (M&I) ounces
contained within 7.16 million tonnes with an average grade of 6.63
g/t AuEq.
- Inferred (Inf): 1.49 million AuEq ounces contained
within 7.56 million tonnes at an average grade of 6.11 g/t
AuEq.
Footnote 1. Stone et
al. 2023. Technical Report and Updated Mineral Resource Estimate of
the Revel Ridge Polymetallic Property. NI 43-101 Technical Report
dated July 28, 2023.
|
Ausenco is a global diversified engineering, environmental,
construction and project management company providing consulting,
project delivery and asset management solutions to the resources,
energy, and infrastructure sectors. Ausenco's experience in
poly-metallic projects ranges from conceptual, pre-feasibility and
feasibility studies for new project developments to project
execution with EPCM and EPC delivery. Ausenco is currently engaged
on a number of global projects with similar characteristics and
opportunities to the Revel Ridge project.
On Behalf of the Board of Directors of
Rokmaster Resources Corp.
John
Mirko
President & Chief Executive Officer.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term in defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this press release.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS: This news
release may contain forward-looking information within the meaning
of applicable securities laws ("forward-looking statements").
Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical
facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words
"expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "intends,"
"estimates," 'projects," "potential" and similar expressions, or
that events or conditions "will," "would," "may," "could" or
"should" occur. These forward-looking statements are subject to a
variety of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual events
or results to differ materially from those reflected in the
forward-looking statements, including, without limitation: risks
related to fluctuations in metal prices; uncertainties related to
raising sufficient financing to fund the planned work in a timely
manner and on acceptable terms; changes in planned work resulting
from weather, logistical, technical or other factors; the
possibility that results of work will not fulfill expectations and
realize the perceived potential of the Company's properties; risk
of accidents, equipment breakdowns and labour disputes or other
unanticipated difficulties or interruptions; the possibility of
cost overruns or unanticipated expenses in the work program; the
risk of environmental contamination or damage resulting from
Rokmaster's operations and other risks and uncertainties. Any
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date it is made
and, except as may be required by applicable securities laws, the
Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information,
future events or results or otherwise.
SOURCE Rokmaster Resources Corp.