Seabridge Gold (TSX:SEA) (NYSE:SA) today reported that the 2016
multi-pronged exploration program on its 100%-owned Iskut Project
in northwestern British Columbia has achieved its primary
objective: to identify a prospective new porphyry copper-gold
system with a potentially intact epithermal precious metals zone at
its top, for drill testing in 2017.
The untested target, known as Quartz Rise, has all
the hallmarks of a porphyry lithocap, a geological feature found at
the top of major porphyry systems throughout the world. A lithocap
is a clay-silica-rich alteration feature which is a product of
hydrothermal fluids escaping at the top of a porphyry mineralizing
system. Typically, these features act as a cover obscuring
structurally-controlled epithermal gold and silver systems that
evolve from intrusive-related porphyry systems.
Commenting on the program, William Threlkeld,
Seabridge’s Senior Vice-President of Exploration, noted that the
Quartz Rise target “has the right high temperature crystalline
clay-silica alteration and a coincident magnetotelluric anomaly
with the appropriate signature. Historical data from magnetic
surveys support the lithocap hypothesis and iron mineral ratio
analysis used successfully in the industry to identify productive
lithocaps is also positive. Finally, and perhaps most importantly,
we have taken samples of this lithocap that contain visible gold,”
Threlked said. “Collectively, these data point to a large and
compelling target for the potential discovery of an
intermediate-sulfidation epithermal precious metals system
overlying porphyry copper-gold mineralization.”
Seabridge completed a limited amount of drilling
this summer at the old high grade Johnny Mountain gold mine to test
detailed ore control concepts on a known deposit while proceeding
with the comprehensive program.
“Our drilling confirmed the key structures that
control mineralization and the likely elevation where we should
expect to find higher grades. The old mine is found at the bottom
of the slope and the high grade gold mineralization does not
continue to depth. In our assessment, the Johnny Mountain mine is
on the edge of a larger system and lies near the bottom of the
productive gold-bearing zone which was largely eroded away by
glaciation. The nearby, higher elevation Quartz Rise resisted
glaciation and remains largely intact in part due to its higher
silica content. We think the upper parts of a porphyry system with
higher grades of precious minerals may lie intact above the Johnny
Mountain mine and under the lithocap on Quartz Rise,” said
Threlkeld. (See image
at http://seabridgegold.net/images/NOct26-16-graph.jpg)
2016 ISKUT PROGRAM
DESCRIPTION
New Geophysical WorkDetailed
magnetotelluric and airborne hyperspectral surveys were completed
over Jurassic Hazelton Group rocks, the rocks that host many of the
deposits in NW BC, on the west slopes of Johnny Mountain. The
purpose of these surveys was to identify the alteration patterns in
the underlying rock formations. Magnetotelluric (MT)
technology acquires data over a large frequency band providing
information on rocks to a potential depth of 3.0 kilometers and was
used successfully at KSM to define the transition between
peripheral alteration and mineralized zones at depth. In the
Johnny Mountain area, there are well defined vertical transitions
between resistive and conductive rocks. These transitions were
shown at KSM to represent contacts between mineralized rocks with
high sulfide concentrations and altered rocks marginal to the
mineral system.
A hyperspectral survey was also flown with sensors
collecting data in wave lengths between 390nm to 2450nm with a 2.0
meter spatial resolution. Images collected from the survey
were geo-referenced and results were then placed into the correct
surface position. This data was collected to distinguish the
various clay and iron oxide minerals that are exposed at the
surface. Mineral ratios can be interpreted to represent
higher and lower temperature alteration zones. The west slope
of Johnny Mountain, the area around the mine that was extensively
glaciated, shows the mineralogical characteristics of a marginal
lower temperature alteration zone. The southwest facing,
unglaciated slope of Quartz Rise has the mineral assemblage typical
of more favorable, higher temperature epithermal alteration.
Compilation of Historical
DataHistorical airborne magnetic data was compiled from
surveys completed by previous owners. These surveys show
smaller, discrete magnetic highs in the glaciated parts of Johnny
Mountain; however, a broader magnetic high is present under the
unglaciated southwest facing slope. The initial
interpretation of this magnetic pattern is that a substantial
intrusive body underlies this southwest facing slope.
Historical drill hole and surface geochemistry have
also been evaluated. Within the Johnny Mountain glaciated
basin, surface and drill hole geochemistry show that gold
concentrations are associated with two structural orientations,
east-northeast and northwest. In and around the Johnny
Mountain Mine, northeast-trending silicic structures were exploited
below surface gold anomalies. Up slope and to the east of the
mine, most of the anomalies are associated with northwest-trending
clay-silica structures. No drilling and very limited surface
sampling was conducted on the unglaciated southwest slope of Johnny
Mountain.
Historical core from the Johnny Mountain Mine was
salvaged from 21 diamond drill holes. These holes were
reassembled, logged and sampled through intervals that, for the
most part, had never been split and sampled. All of these shallow
holes were drilled perpendicular to the strike of the
northeast-trending silicic structures, but there were no intervals
remaining in the core boxes from the principal structures exploited
in the mine; however, assay reports were available that showed high
grade gold over narrow intervals. Several sub-parallel
structures were identified from the logging and sampling of these
holes. (See the Appendix at the end of this news release for
details)
Drill TestingSeabridge completed
3,368 meters of drilling on the Iskut project this year to obtain
data on the structures that control gold concentrations. The
Johnny Mountain Mine area was selected to test for these controls
because it provided abundant historical drill holes and ample
underground data to expand upon the control concepts.
An extensive zone of adularia-clay alteration with
disseminated pyrite is hosted in flat laying tuffaceous units and
phreatic breccia bodies around the Johnny Mountain Mine. The
phreatic breccia is best developed in the hanging wall of
northwest-trending structures and believed to be associated with
fluid boiling along these structures. Diorite intrusions were
encountered at depth, their emplacement controlled by the
northwest-trending structures and contacts within the tuff units.
Structures crossed in the drill holes were principally semi-massive
pyrite or intense silica replacement. The pyrite-rich
structures were best preserved near the margins of and within the
diorite intrusion.
The drill program targeted a range of locations and
elevations in the mine area, including:
- Intersections in the west part of the Johnny Mountain Mine with
holes JM-16-01, 02, 03, and 12.
- Intersections in the central part of the Johnny Mountain Mine
with holes JM-16-04, 05, 06 and 11.
- Intersections in the south part of the Johnny Mountain Mine
with holes JM-16-09, and 10.
- An intersection in the east part of the Johnny Mountain Mine
with holes JM-16-07, and 08.
- A northwest trending structure identified in the MT survey,
JM-16-13.
Several of the drill holes terminated in
underground workings and did not test their intended targets.
Other holes did cross the intended structures and showed that
multiple gold-bearing fluids with a diverse geochemical signature
exploited the northwest-trending clay-silica structures. The
northeast-trending silicic structures seem to have focused the
later gold-copper mineralizing fluids with the abundance and
intensity of gold and hydrothermal alteration diminishing with
depth. Observations from these drill holes support an
interpretation that the Johnny Mountain Mine is on the margin of a
larger mineral system, now believed to be southeast of the mine
area (http://seabridgegold.net/images/NOct26-16-graph.jpg). For
more detail see the Appendix.
Exploration activities by Seabridge at the Iskut
Project are being conducted under the supervision of William E.
Threlkeld, Registered Professional Geologist, Senior Vice President
of the Company and a Qualified Person as defined by National
Instrument 43-101. Mr. Threlkeld has reviewed and approved this
news release. An ongoing and rigorous quality control/quality
assurance protocol is employed in all Seabridge drilling campaigns.
This program includes blank and reference standards. Cross-check
analyses include metallic screen fire assay techniques and external
laboratory analysis on at least 10% of the drill samples.
Seabridge holds a 100% interest in several North
American gold projects. The Company's principal assets are the KSM
Project located near Stewart, British Columbia, Canada and the
Courageous Lake gold project located in Canada's Northwest
Territories. For a full breakdown of Seabridge's mineral reserves
and mineral resources by category please visit the Company's
website at http://www.seabridgegold.net/resources.php.
Neither the Toronto Stock Exchange,
New York Stock Exchange, or their Regulation Services Providers
accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this
release.
This document contains "forward-looking
information" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation
and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United
States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This
information and these statements, referred to herein as
"forward-looking statements" are made as of the date of this
document. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or
future performance and reflect current estimates, predictions,
interpretations, expectations or beliefs regarding future events
and include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to:
(i) the identification of a prospective new porphyry copper-gold
system with a potential epithermal precious metals zone at its top
that may be intact; (ii) the potential for discovery at the Iskut
Project of an intermediate-sulfidation epithermal precious metals
system overlying porphyry copper-gold mineralization; (iii) this
year’s drilling confirming the likely elevation where to find
higher grades; (iv) the assessment that the Johnny Mountain mine is
on the edge of a larger system and lies near the bottom of the
productive gold-bearing zone which was largely eroded away by
glaciation; (v) Seabridge thinking that the upper parts of a
porphyry system with higher grades of precious minerals may lie
intact above the Johnny Mountain mine and under the lithocap on
Quartz Rise; (vi) the initial interpretation of the magnetic
pattern found in the surveys of previous owners is that a
substantial intrusive body underlies the southwest facing slope at
Johnny Mountain; (vii) the northeast-trending silicic structures at
Johnny Mountain seeming to have focused the later gold-copper
mineralizing fluids with the abundance and intensity of gold and
hydrothermal alteration diminishing with depth; and (viii) an
interpretation from the drill hole results that the Johnny Mountain
Mine is on the margin of a larger mineral system, now believed to
be southeast of the mine area.
All forward-looking statements are based on
Seabridge's or its consultants' current beliefs as well as various
assumptions made by them and information currently available to
them. Although management considers these assumptions to be
reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may
prove to be incorrect. Many forward-looking statements are made
assuming the correctness of other forward looking
statements.
Forward-looking statements involve various
risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such
statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future
events could differ materially from those anticipated in such
statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from the Company's plans or expectations include
the risk that the interpretations of the geologic formations at the
Johnny Mountain mine do not conform to the geologic models that are
the foundations for such hypotheses and other risks outlined in
statements made by the Company from time to time in the filings
made by the Company with securities regulators. A detailed
cautionary statement outlining the forward looking statements in
the mineral reserves and mineral resources reported by the Company,
as well as assumptions and risks relating to them appears on its
website. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to
update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise
required by applicable securities legislation.
We caution readers not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements as a number of
important factors could cause the actual outcomes to differ
materially from the beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations,
anticipations, estimates assumptions and intentions expressed in
such forward-looking statements.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD"Rudi Fronk"
Chairman & C.E.O.
For further information please contact:Rudi P.
Fronk, Chairman and C.E.O.Tel: (416) 367-9292 · Fax: (416)
367-2711Email: info@seabridgegold.net
Appendix
Seabridge completed 3,368 meters of drilling on the
Iskut project during August and September of this year. The
drill holes were designed to test projections of structural
intersections below the Johnny Mountain Mine to determine the chief
fluid pathways for gold mineralization. Drill holes were
oriented to test the projected intersection of both
northeast-trending silicic structures and northwest-trending
clay-silica structures.
Drill Testing
Drill Hole |
Total Depth |
From |
To |
Length |
Gold (g/T) |
Silver (g/T) |
% Copper |
Elevation Mid-point of Interval (m) |
JM-16-01 |
252.0 |
104.1 |
107.7 |
3.6 |
2.07 |
6.8 |
0.60 |
1088 |
JM-16-02 |
109.2hole lost |
73.2 |
76.2 |
3.0 |
1.31 |
3.8 |
0.00 |
1133 |
102.4 |
109.2 |
6.8 |
2.21 |
1.2 |
0.00 |
1109 |
JM-16-03 |
243.0Including |
95.0 |
113.5 |
18.5 |
1.24 |
1.5 |
0.05 |
1106 |
109.0 |
113.5 |
4.5 |
3.32 |
1.6 |
0.00 |
JM-16-04 |
68.0hole lost |
64.5 |
68.0 |
3.5 |
0.66 |
11.4 |
0.04 |
1164 |
JM-16-05 |
71.0hole lost |
40.3 |
45.8 |
5.5 |
0.57 |
2.3 |
0.04 |
1182 |
JM-16-06 |
348.0including |
153.5 |
161.4 |
7.9 |
4.05 |
32.4 |
2.09 |
1066 |
156.6 |
158.7 |
2.1 |
13.95 |
44.3 |
6.98 |
JM-16-07 |
246.0 |
No significant intercepts |
|
JM-16-08 |
393.0 |
No significant intercepts |
|
JM-16-09 |
408.0 |
51.8 |
60.7 |
8.9 |
0.60 |
1.8 |
0.06 |
1216 |
387.5 |
390.5 |
3.0 |
0.12 |
5.5 |
0.26 |
914 |
JM-16-10 |
207.0 |
100.0 |
106.0 |
6.0 |
0.95 |
1.5 |
0.02 |
1085 |
128.5 |
133.0 |
4.5 |
0.79 |
0.7 |
0.01 |
1061 |
JM-16-11 |
252.0 |
154.2 |
158.2 |
4.0 |
5.58 |
2.36 |
0.09 |
1087 |
JM-16-12 |
405.5 |
No significant intervals |
|
JM-16-13 |
402.5 |
No significant intervals |
|
SK-215g |
166.1 |
131.2 |
135.1 |
3.9 |
1.70 |
2.7 |
0.12 |
1109 |
SK-252 |
187.8 |
143.9 |
146.9 |
3.0 |
2.74 |
0.8 |
0.01 |
1100 |
U122-11 |
21.3 |
11.0 |
21.3 |
10.3 |
11.44 |
5.9 |
0.06 |
1129 |
|
including |
14.0 |
18.6 |
4.6 |
21.94 |
10.0 |
0.08 |
U244-11 |
68.3 |
48.5 |
59.0 |
10.5 |
1.59 |
2.2 |
0.13 |
1094 |
U300-11 |
64.6 |
3.3 |
12.8 |
9.5 |
1.54 |
2.1 |
0.00 |
1126 |
|
|
47.9 |
57.0 |
9.1 |
3.26 |
11.0 |
0.42 |
1137 |
|
including |
49.0 |
52.6 |
3.6 |
7.65 |
24.6 |
1.00 |
SK83-27 |
84.1 |
68.6 |
75.5 |
6.9 |
12.64 |
28.4 |
0.15 |
1172 |
The JM-16-series holes were drilled by Seabridge
obliquely to the structural orientations and are not known to have
intersected a true thickness of the structures; at this time the
width of these features cannot be determined. Holes with the
prefix SK were historical holes drilled at an azimuth of
approximately 150 degrees and are thought to represent a
true thickness of structures oriented at 60 degrees. Drill
holes with the prefix U were also historical holes drilled from
underground and collared at various azimuths to accommodate local
variations in the strike of the target structures insuring a true
width intersection of the feature.
Brief Drill Hole Descriptions follow:
JM-16-01This hole was drilled at a 190 degree
azimuth and a -70 degree dip. Designed to test the down dip
intersection of the northeast and northwest striking structures
approximately 60 meters below the lowest mine workings (10 level,
1081 meters elevation) on the southwestern end of the old mine.
This drill hole did intersect semi-massive to massive pyrite in a
quartz breccia from 182 – 198 meter depth where the structure
was expected, but this zone did not contain any appreciable gold. A
smaller, narrow parallel structure was intersected in the hanging
wall with a 0.6 meter central interval of 8.76 g/T Au, 26.7 g/T Ag
and 3.16% Cu.
JM-16-02This hole was drilled from the same drill
pad as JM-16-01, at the same azimuth, but at a shallower dip (-45
degrees) to test the area between the historical 10 (1081 meters
elevation) and 11 (1135 meters elevation) level workings.
Unfortunately, this hole encountered undocumented old mine workings
at a depth of 109.2 meters and could not continue. The hole
intersected 6.8 meters of Au mineralization averaging 2.21 g/T Au
and low Ag and Cu values in brecciated diorite directly hanging
wall to the workings from 102.4 – 109.2 meters. Two narrow
subparallel structures were also encountered, one at 63.0 to 64.5
meters which averaged 2.27 g/T Au and one at 73.2 to 74.7 meters
which averaged 2.31 g/T Au, corresponding with the hanging
wall structure mentioned in hole JM-16-01 above.
JM-16-03After hole JM-16-02 was abandoned, the
drill was turned 8 degrees to the west, with the same intention of
intersecting the structures between the existing mine workings at a
-50 degree dip. This was accomplished as the hole was completed to
a depth of 243 meters. Where hole JM-16-02 intersected old workings
at 109.2 meters, this hole intersected 18.5 meters of Au
mineralization that averaged 1.24 g/T Au from 95.0 – 113.5 meters
in the same brecciated diorite. The 4.5 meters on the footwall part
of the structure from 109.0 – 113.5 meters averaged 3.32 g/T
Au. Higher in the hole, two narrow intervals with gold grades
in the 0.50g/T range were encountered.
JM-16-04This hole was designed to intersect a
different structural intersection (at the same orientations as
above) roughly 100 meters northeast from drill holes JM-16-01
through 03 in the southcentral area of the old mine. The hole was
drilled at a 190 degree azimuth and a -55 degree dip.
Unfortunately, this hole also intersected undocumented historical
mine workings between the 10 and 11 levels at 68.0 meters. In the
hanging wall of the workings, grades were increasing down hole and
over the final 3.5 meters averaged 0.66 g/T Au.
JM-16-05After JM-16-04 was abandoned, the drill was
turned 5 degrees to the south, and this hole was drilled at an
azimuth of 185 degrees with a -60 degree dip. Again, this hole was
lost after intersecting underground workings at 71 meters. There
was a 1.5 meter interval of 1.2 g/T Au right above the workings, as
well as a zone that averaged 0.57 g/T Au over 5.5 meters in the
hanging wall at 40.3 meters.
JM-16-06This drill hole was designed to intersect
one of the northwest trending structures in the central part of the
mine roughly 120 meters north of holes 04 and 05. This hole was
drilled at a 190 degree azimuth with a dip of -60 degrees. The hole
intersected the best interval of the program in brecciated diorite
within the structure retuning 7.9 meters averaging 4.05 g/T Au,
2.09% Cu, and 32.5 g/T Ag. Within this zone, 2.1 meters averaged
13.95 g/T Au, 6.98% Cu and 44.3 g/T Ag. Other narrow zones in
the hanging wall of the mineralized structure contained 2.83 g/T Au
in diorite and 0.52 g/T Au in tuff.
JM-16-07This hole was designed to test another
structural intersection in the footwall side of the northeastern
area of the mine approximately 200 meters from holes 04 and 05.
This hole was drilled at a 100 degree azimuth and a -50 degree dip
to a depth of 246 meters. Although this hole didn’t intersect
reportable gold grades, two encouraging near surface intervals were
intersected. From 26.5 – 30 meters, a zone of anomalous copper was
found in the favorable diorite breccia, and from 53.5 – 58.0 meters
a zone with semi-massive sulphide in tuffs was intersected, again
with anomalous copper.
JM-16-08This hole was drilled at the far
northeastern extent of the known veins and structures and was
designed to test a lesser understood structural intersection. The
hole was drilled at a 190 degree azimuth and a -65 degree dip to a
depth of 393 meters. Again, this hole didn’t have any reportable
gold values, however, there were several short intervals with 0.4 –
0.6 g/T Au (associated with sphalerite) well above the targets
intersection and a zone with anomalous copper in a brecciated
diorite at 245 – 249 meters depth. Below the targeted
intersection at about 300 meters, the drill hole encountered
tuffaceous rocks depleted in gold.
JM-16-09This hole was drilled at a 280 degree
azimuth and a -60 degree dip to a depth of 408 meters. The purpose
of this hole was to test the east-northeast trending vein sets in
the south-central portion of the mine. In one of the targeted
structures, 8.9 meters of silicically altered tuff-hosted breccia
averaging 0.6 g/T Au was intersected from 51.8 – 60.7 meters.
Several other minor sections with anomalous copper were also
intersected deeper in the hole. This hole collared south of the
mineral system and stayed in the footwall below the system.
JM-16-10This hole was drilled in the far
southeastern area of the mine at a 190 degree azimuth with a -60
degree dip to a depth of 170 meters. This hole was designed to
intersect another one of the east-northeast structures. Only a pair
of lower grade sections were intersected within silicified and
brecciated tuffs, one at 100.0 – 106.0 meters returned 0.95 g/T Au
over 6 meters and a second interval of 4.5 meters starting at 128.5
meters with 0.79 g/T Au.
JM-16-11This hole was designed to intersect another
structural intersection in the southcentral part of the mine. The
hole was drilled south of, and along the same fence as, holes 04
and 05 at a 190 degree azimuth, with a -65 degree dip, to a depth
of 252 meters. In the upper part of this hole a 2.6 meter
wide quartz vein contained 0.70g/T Au. A high grade intercept
was cut at 155.7 meter depth at the target zone, once again in
brecciated diorite, one meter reported 20.90 g/T gold with the 2.5
meter interval averaging 8.81 g/T Au. Below the target
high-grade interval, gold grades show intense depletion.
JM-16-12This hole was set up well north of the
central portion of the mine, targeting the down dip, deep extension
of the structures. This hole was drilled at a 190 degree azimuth
with a -55 degree dip to a depth of 405.5 meters. The upper part of
the hole had some spotty anomalous copper values. One structure was
intersected from 362 – 366.5 meters and averaged 0.62% Cu. This
interval was hosted in the tuffs, and contained increased
pyrrhotite and magnetite. This interval seems to be the deeper
parts of the same structures found within the mine, but gold grades
are strongly depleted around this interval.
JM-16-13This hole was drilled roughly 900 meters
northeast of the other drilling. The hole was designed to test an
extension of the northeast trending structures as identified
through the geophysics conducted this summer. The hole was drilled
at a 260 degree azimuth with a -70 degree dip to a depth of 402.5
meters. There were no reportable grade intervals intersected,
several narrow sections with anomalous copper, lead and zinc
encountered in the tuffs, however gold grades are depleted in this
area.
Re-logging and samplingRe-logging
and sampling of historical core drill holes at Johnny Mountain were
undertaken to expand the geochemical data set for this gold
occurrence and evaluate the controls on gold distribution
associated with past production. Surface and underground
mapping on the Johnny Mountain Mine showed a complex
interrelationship between northwest and northeast structures,
however the historical drilling seemed to have exclusively tested
the northeast structural trend. Evaluation of the historical
cores was instrumental in identifying the alteration styles and
rock units involved in the gold mineralization.
The re-logging and sampling provided a
stratigraphic section in the shallow part of the deposit.
Past operators removed the main intersection of the
northeast-trending silica-rich structures, and only historical
assay results were available. Identification of subparallel
mineralized structures provided some insight into ore controls but
gave little understanding of the interaction between northeast and
northwest structures. This effort provided an expanded
geochemical set for the mine area; however, it was clear that
confirmatory drilling was required to assess the northwest-trending
structures, the intersection of northeast and northwest trending
structures and these structures at depth.
Seabridge Gold (TSX:SEA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2024 to Jan 2025
Seabridge Gold (TSX:SEA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2024 to Jan 2025