Item
5.07. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
On
May 20, 2019, One Madison convened and then adjourned the General Meeting. At the initial call of the General Meeting on May 20,
2018, a total of 21,918,215 Class A ordinary shares and 10,750,000 Class B ordinary shares of One Madison, out of a total of 30,000,000
Class A ordinary shares and 11,250,000 Class B ordinary shares issued and outstanding and entitled to vote as of the close of
business on May 6, 2019 (the record date for the General Meeting), were present in person or represented by proxy.
At
the initial call of the General Meeting, the only proposal submitted to a vote of One Madison’s shareholders was the proposal
to approve the adjournment of the General Meeting to a later date or dates, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies
in the event that there were insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of the Business Combination
Proposal or the NYSE Proposal. One Madison’s shareholders approved the adjournment proposal. The following were the tabulated
votes “For” and “Against” this proposal as well as the number of “Abstentions”:
Proposal
13: Adjournment of the General Meeting, if necessary
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
28,367,828
|
|
4,300,387
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Following
the vote on the adjournment proposal at the initial call of the General Meeting, the General Meeting was adjourned until May 28,
2019. At the reconvened General Meeting, a total of 26,535,253 Class A ordinary shares and 10,750,000 Class B ordinary shares
of One Madison, out of a total of 30,000,000 Class A ordinary shares and 11,250,000 Class B ordinary shares issued and outstanding
and entitled to vote as of the close of business on May 6, 2019, were present in person or represented by proxy at the General
Meeting. A summary of the voting results for the following proposals, each of which is described in detail in the joint proxy
statement/prospectus dated May 2, 2019 and first mailed to One Madison’s shareholders on or about May 6, 2019, is set forth
below:
Proposal
1: Adoption of the Business Combination Proposal
One
Madison’s shareholders approved the transactions contemplated by the stock purchase agreement, dated as of December 12,
2018, as amended or modified from time to time, by and among One Madison, Rack Holdings L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“
Seller
”),
and Rack Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“
Rack Holdings
”), the owner of all of the issued and outstanding
equity interests of Ranpak Corp., pursuant to which One Madison will acquire all of the issued and outstanding equity interests
of Rack Holdings from Seller, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein (the “
business combination
”
and such proposal, the “
Business Combination Proposal
”). The following were the tabulated votes “For”
and “Against” this proposal as well as the number of “Abstentions”:
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
35,857,803
|
|
1,427,450
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Proposal
2: Adoption of the NYSE Proposal
One
Madison’s shareholders approved for purposes of complying with applicable listing rules of The New York Stock Exchange,
the issuance by One Madison of Class A ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share, and Class C ordinary shares, par value $0.0001
per share, to certain accredited investors, including certain directors, officers and substantial security holders of One Madison,
in each case in a private placement, the proceeds of which will be used to finance the business combination and related transactions
and the costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith with any balance used for working capital purposes (the “
NYSE
Proposal
”). The following were the tabulated votes “For” and “Against” this proposal as well
as the number of “Abstentions”:
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
35,857,803
|
|
1,427,450
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Proposal
3: Adoption of the Domestication Proposal
One
Madison’s shareholders approved by special resolution the change of One Madison’s jurisdiction of incorporation from
the Cayman Islands to the State of Delaware by deregistering as an exempted company in the Cayman Islands and domesticating and
continuing as a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. The following were the tabulated votes “For”
and “Against” this proposal as well as the number of “Abstentions” and “Broker Non-Votes”:
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
30,780,278
|
|
6,504,975
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Proposal
4: Adoption of the Organizational Documents Proposal A
One
Madison’s shareholders approved (i) the change of One Madison’s name from “One Madison Corporation” to
“Ranpak Holdings Corp.”, (ii) adopting Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain stockholder litigation, (iii) upon
the closing of the business combination (the “
closing
”), making One Madison’s corporate existence perpetual
and (iv) upon the closing, providing for the ineffectiveness of certain provisions in One Madison’s existing organizational
documents relating to its status as a blank check company that will no longer be applicable to us following the closing (“
Organizational
Documents Proposal A
”). The following were the tabulated votes “For” and “Against” this proposal
as well as the number of “Abstentions”:
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
30,780,278
|
|
6,504,975
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Proposal
5: Adoption of the Organizational Documents Proposal B
One
Madison’s shareholders approved provisions providing that One Madison’s board of directors will be divided into three
classes following the business combination, with each class generally serving for a term of three years and with only one class
of directors being elected in each year (“
Organizational Documents Proposal B
”). The following were the tabulated
votes “For” and “Against” this proposal as well as the number of “Abstentions”:
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
30,030,278
|
|
7,254,975
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Proposal
6: Adoption of the Organizational Documents Proposal C
One
Madison’s shareholders approved provisions providing that the directors of One Madison may only be removed for cause (“
Organizational
Documents Proposal C
”). The following were the tabulated votes “For” and “Against” this proposal
as well as the number of “Abstentions”:
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
30,029,278
|
|
7,255,975
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Proposal
7: Adoption of the Organizational Documents Proposal D
One
Madison’s shareholders approved advance notice procedures with regard to the nomination by shareholders of candidates for
election as directors (“
Organizational Documents Proposal D
”). The following were the tabulated votes “For”
and “Against” this proposal as well as the number of “Abstentions”:
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
30,029,278
|
|
7,255,975
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Proposal
8: Adoption of the Organizational Documents Proposal E
One
Madison’s shareholders approved provisions removing the ability of shareholders to call a special meeting of shareholders
(“
Organizational Documents Proposal E
”). The following were the tabulated votes “For” and “Against”
this proposal as well as the number of “Abstentions”:
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
29,995,250
|
|
7,286,497
|
|
3,506
|
|
—
|
Proposal
9: Adoption of the Organizational Documents Proposal F
One
Madison’s shareholders approved provisions removing the ability of shareholders to act by written consent in lieu of a meeting
(“
Organizational Documents Proposal F
”). The following were the tabulated votes “For” and “Against”
this proposal as well as the number of “Abstentions”:
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
29,772,313
|
|
7,509,434
|
|
3,506
|
|
—
|
Proposal
10: Adoption of the Organizational Documents Proposal G
One
Madison’s shareholders approved the amendment and restatement of the existing organizational documents by the deletion of
the existing organizational documents in their entirety and the substitution of the proposed organizational documents in their
place to (among other matters) reflect the changes effected by Organizational Documents Proposals A through F. The following were
the tabulated votes “For” and “Against” this proposal as well as the number of “Abstentions”:
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
30,779,278
|
|
6,505,975
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Proposal
11: Adoption of the Director Election Proposal
The
holders of One Madison’s Class B ordinary shares (i) re-elected One Madison’s current directors, Omar Asali, Michael
Jones, Thomas Corley and Robert King and (ii) elected Steve Kovach, Salil Seshadri, Michael Gliedman and Alicia Tranen, in each
case, to serve as directors upon completion of the business combination until their respective successors are duly elected and
qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. The following were the tabulated votes “For” and
“Against” this proposal as well as the number of “Abstentions”:
Omar
Asali
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
10,750,000
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Michael
Jones
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
10,750,000
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Thomas
Corley
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
10,750,000
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Robert
King
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
10,750,000
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Steve
Kovach
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
10,750,000
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Salil
Seshadri
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
10,750,000
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Michael
Gliedman
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
10,750,000
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Alicia
Tranen
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
10,750,000
|
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
—
|
Proposal
12: Adoption of the Incentive Plan Proposal
One
Madison’s shareholders approved the Incentive Plan. The following were the tabulated votes “For” and “Against”
this proposal as well as the number of “Abstentions”:
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN
|
|
BROKER
NON-VOTE
|
34,383,866
|
|
2,151,387
|
|
750,000
|
|
—
|
Proposal
13: Adjournment of the General Meeting, if necessary
In
connection with the General Meeting, One Madison also solicited proxies with respect to a proposal to approve the adjournment
of the General Meeting to a later date or dates, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies in the event that there were
insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection with, the approval of the Business Combination Proposal or the NYSE Proposal.
The adjournment proposal was not submitted to One Madison shareholders for approval at the reconvened General Meeting because
One Madison shareholders approved the Business Combination Proposal and the NYSE Proposal, as noted above, and One Madison did
not otherwise have reason to adjourn the General Meeting.