Whalatane
23 hours ago
Stumble its usually the generics that are made overseas.
Brand drugs like OLC sometimes start out being made in places like Puerto Rico ...so would be considered US .
So this Trumps Pharma tariff may actual help OLC price wise ...as the generics like Fosrenol and Renvela that OLC will compete with are almost certainly made ex US ( India , maybe Costa Rico etc )
Well to correct myself
India and China: These countries dominate API production for both brand and generic phosphate binders due to established supply chains and cost advantages. India supplies a large portion of generics to the US market.
US and Europe: Some brand-name binders, especially biologics or complex formulations, may have final assembly in the US or Europe, but even these often rely on imported APIs.
Regulatory Oversight: The FDA inspects foreign facilities, but concerns persist about quality control in some overseas plants, particularly in China.
Maybe their back up manufacturer imports the API and does the final assembly in the US ?
I believe OLC is a complex formulation ...extra O2 molecule added to reduce side effects like nausea
Kiwi
Denisk
1 day ago
On July 7, 2025, the Company received confirmation from the Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq that as of July 3, 2025 the Company’s common stock has maintained an average closing share price of at least $1.00 immediately following the Company’s 1:10 reverse stock split that became effective on June 20, 2025 The Company’s shares are no longer considered to be below the minimum bid price requirement of Rule 5550(a)(2), and as a result the Company has regained compliance with the Nasdaq continued listing standard. Nasdaq now considers this matter closed.
Looking for the stock price to go back above $5.50 by month end...
Whalatane
3 days ago
My reply
# 255605
Sunday, July 06, 2025 8:41:48 PM
Post# of 255607
Thx for the DD
Re the pill
Renvela ...the most prescribed generic pho binder is usually 2-3 large pills with each meal ....vs 1 small UNCY pill
Renvela is swallowed as is UNCY's OLC
Fosrenol ( another popular binder ) must be chewed with each meal ...1-2 pills depending on dosage
So on approval UNCY's OLC will enter the TDAPA process for 2-3 yrs
During this period Medicare pays the dialysis providers 100% of the average sales price ( ASP ) of OLC plus a small handling fee .
Part B Medicare might have a small copay ...which might apply to all the pho binders . I dont have all the details on that
So imagine you are the average Medicare Dialysis patient .
You are on 10-20 pills a day ...blood pressure meds , Anemia , Statins , Beta blockers and your average of 6 pho binders per day already .
If it's no difference in cost to you ...100% covered by Medicare for 2-3 yrs .....do you want to stay with your average of 6 pho binders a day ..usually large pills to be swallowed or crushed , 2 taken with each meal .
Or switch to one small pill that can be swallowed with each meal and which may have fewer side effects than the current meds.
Pill size does matter to many . I was on the Statin Lipitor ( which is a fairly large pill at max dose ) for years , but switched to Crestor partly because it is a lot smaller pill and I found it easier to take.
Kiwi
Denisk
7 days ago
RMB, hello
If this may console you, I did sent a letter/email yesterday evening to UNCY. inquiring specifically on 2 separate matters: 1- the streamlining of all R& D and G& A overhead expenses over the year.
2- I also inquired about the manufacturer’s CMC issues & whether they are contemplating expanding to the list of the 3 manufacturer's disclosed ion their statement in order to avoid having to pay premium cost to the selected final manufacturers which would affect their COG & their gross profit margin.
I just did receive a quick response as of this afternoon via email with the following verbatum response:
" Kevin Gardner <kgardner@lifesciadvisors.com>
1:06?PM (5 hours ago)
to me, IR
Dear Mr. Kuziora,
Thank you for your thoughtful outreach.
I have relayed your message to Unicycive management, and they appreciate your inquiry.
I’m somewhat constrained on details that may not yet be public.
However, I can tell you that the management team is highly confident that a resolution with the FDA will be resolved in an expeditious manner, while bringing the cash burn down to a minimal level.
They made a commitment to be prudent about adding commercial hires until they have an approval in hand.
The company will report more details on cash level and burn on the 2Q’25 earnings release, which will be coming this summer.
They will also communicate more details on the anticipated Type A meeting with the FDA when appropriate in the coming days.
Thank you again, and please be assured this team remains incredibly excited about the market opportunity for OLC.
Best regards,
Kevin"
So apparently they are planning on reducing the bleeding of the cash burn & I also requested that they communicate my letter to the CEO & CFO of the company.
Here is the detail of my letter regarding the second issue:
2. With reference to the manufacturer’s CMC issues, you have disclosed the presence of a second manufacturer which has already successfully produced OLC drug as well as a backup third party. Are you actively eyeing for another possible manufacturer to avoid a possible situation where the designated manufacturer demands premium prices to produce the drug, thereby affecting your COG and margin profit
and avoid further delays in bringing the drug to market?