SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
2991 Oak Grove Road
Poplar Bluff, Missouri 63901
(573) 778-1800
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To be held on October 30, 2023
Notice is hereby given that the annual meeting of shareholders of Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. will be held at our corporate headquarters, located at 2991 Oak Grove Road, Poplar Bluff, Missouri, on October 30, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. local time.
A proxy card and a proxy statement for the annual meeting are enclosed.
The annual meeting is for the purpose of considering and voting on the following proposals:
| Proposal 1. | Election of four directors of Southern Missouri Bancorp, each for a term of three years; |
| Proposal 2. | An advisory (non-binding) vote on executive compensation, commonly referred to as a “say on pay” vote; and |
| Proposal 3. | Ratification of the appointment of FORVIS, LLP as Southern Missouri Bancorp’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024. |
Shareholders also will transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof. As of the date of this notice, we are not aware of any other business to come before the annual meeting.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on September 8, 2023, as the record date for the annual meeting. This means that shareholders of record at the close of business on that date are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. Shareholders have a choice of voting by Internet or by telephone, by mailing a completed proxy card or by submitting a ballot in person at the Annual Meeting. Regardless of the number of shares you own, your vote is very important. Please act today to ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting.
| |
| BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
| |
| /s/ Charles R. Love |
| Charles R. Love |
| Secretary |
| |
Poplar Bluff, Missouri | |
September 25, 2023 | |
SOUTHERN MISSOURI BANCORP, INC.
2991 Oak Grove Road
Poplar Bluff, Missouri 63901
(573) 778-1800
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To be held on October 30, 2023
Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc.’s Board of Directors is using this proxy statement to solicit proxies from the holders of Southern Missouri Bancorp common stock for use at our annual meeting of shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”). We are first mailing this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card to our shareholders on or about September 25, 2023. Certain of the information provided herein relates to Southern Bank, a wholly owned subsidiary of Southern Missouri Bancorp. Southern Bank may also be referred to from time to time as the “Bank.” References to “Southern Missouri Bancorp”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc. and, as the context requires, Southern Bank.
By submitting your proxy, you authorize our Board of Directors to represent you and vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions. The Board also may vote your shares to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time and will be authorized to vote your shares at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.
Southern Missouri Bancorp’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, which includes Southern Missouri Bancorp’s audited financial statements, is enclosed. Although the Annual Report is being mailed to shareholders with this proxy statement, it does not constitute a part of the proxy solicitation materials and is not incorporated into this proxy statement by reference. These materials are also available via the Internet at http://www.edocumentview.com/SMBC.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Time and Place of the Annual Meeting.
| |
Our annual meeting will be held as follows: |
| |
Date: | October 30, 2023 |
Time: | 9:00 a.m., local time |
Place: | Southern Missouri Bancorp, Inc./Southern Bank |
| 2991 Oak Grove Road |
| Poplar Bluff, Missouri |
Matters to be Considered at the Annual Meeting.
At the Annual Meeting, shareholders of Southern Missouri Bancorp are being asked to consider and vote upon the following proposals:
| |
Proposal I. | Election of four directors of Southern Missouri Bancorp, each for a term of three years; |
Proposal II. | An advisory (non-binding) vote on executive compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement (the “Say on Pay Vote”); |
Proposal III. | Ratification of the appointment of FORVIS, LLP as Southern Missouri Bancorp’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024 (the “Independent Auditor Proposal”). |
The shareholders also will transact any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. As of the date of this proxy statement, we are not aware of any other business to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than the matters described in this proxy statement.
Voting
We have fixed September 8, 2023 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting, and any and all adjournments or postponements thereof. Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. The total number of shares of Southern Missouri Bancorp common stock outstanding on the Record Date was 11,336,462. These are the only securities of the Company entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
You are entitled to cast one vote for each share of Southern Missouri Bancorp common stock held on the Record Date; provided, however, that under Section 3.2 of our articles of incorporation, any person who beneficially owns in excess of 10% of the outstanding shares of Southern Missouri common stock may not vote the excess shares without the prior approval of a majority of the Whole Board (defined as the total number of directors we would have if there were no vacancies on the Board of Directors). In order for any proposals considered at the Annual Meeting to be approved by shareholders, a quorum must be present. The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Southern Missouri common stock entitled to vote, present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, will constitute a quorum. Proxies received but marked as abstentions or broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting. Directors will be elected by a majority of the shares entitled to vote thereon and represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. This means that the number of votes cast “For” election of a nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “Against” that nominee and as “Abstain” with respect to that nominee in order for the nominee to be elected. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “Against” a nominee and broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote with respect to a nominee. The approvals of the Say on Pay Vote and the Independent Auditor Proposal each require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote thereon and represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting.
With regard to the Say on Pay Vote and the Independent Auditor Proposal, stockholders may vote for or against these proposals or abstain from voting on these proposals. In determining the percentage of shares that have been affirmatively voted on the Say on Pay Vote and the Independent Auditor Proposal, the affirmative votes will be measured against the aggregate votes ”For,” “Against” and “Abstain” with respect to each proposal. Thus, abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the Say on Pay Vote and the Independent Auditor Proposal and broker non-votes will have no effect on these proposals. The outcome of the Say on Pay Vote is not binding on the Board of Directors.
All shares of Southern Missouri common stock represented at the Annual Meeting by proxies solicited hereunder will be voted in accordance with the specifications made by the shareholders executing the proxies. If a properly executed and unrevoked proxy solicited hereunder does not specify how the shares represented thereby are to be voted, the shares will be voted FOR the election as directors of the persons named in this proxy statement, FOR the Say on Pay Vote and FOR the Independent Auditor Proposal, and in accordance with the discretion of the
PROPOSAL I -- ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our Board of Directors currently consists of eleven members. Approximately one-third of the directors are elected annually to serve for a three-year period or until their respective successors are elected and qualified. The term of office of one class of directors expires each year in rotation so that the class up for election at each annual meeting serves for a three-year term. The terms of four of the present directors are expiring at the Annual Meeting.
Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will hold office for a three-year term expiring in 2026. All of our nominees currently serve as directors of the Company and the Bank. Each nominee has consented to being named in this proxy statement and has agreed to serve if elected. If a nominee is unable to stand for election, the Board of Directors may either reduce the number of directors to be elected or select a substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is selected, the proxy holders will vote your shares for the substitute nominee, unless you have withheld authority. At this time, we are not aware of any reason why a nominee might be unable to serve if elected.
Except as disclosed in this proxy statement, there are no arrangements or understandings between any nominee and any other person pursuant to which such nominee was selected. The principal occupation and business experience for the last five years and certain other information with respect to each nominee is set forth below. The information concerning the nominees has been furnished to us by them.
The Board believes that the many years of service that our directors have at the Company, the Bank or at other financial institutions is one of their most important qualifications for service on our Board. This service has given them extensive knowledge of the banking business and the Company. Furthermore, their service on Board committees here or at other institutions, especially in areas of audit, compliance and compensation is critical to their ability to oversee the management of the Bank by our executive officers. Service on the Board by our Chief Executive Officer is critical to aiding the outside directors’ understanding of the complicated issues that are common in the banking business. Each outside director brings special skills, experience, and expertise to the Board as a result of their other business activities and associations.
Nominees to Serve a Three-Year Term Expiring at the 2026 Annual Meeting
Rebecca M. Brooks, Age 67. Ms. Brooks is the financial operations manager for McLane Transport, Inc. She has held that position since 1997. In that capacity, her duties include financial statement preparation and analysis, budgeting, oversight of the firm’s payroll, payables, and receivables functions, and tax management. She was previously employed in healthcare administration and served as president of a small hospital employee credit union. That institution merged with Maxwell-Gunter Federal Credit Union, where she served on the board of directors for five years. Ms. Brooks provides expertise to the Board of Directors in the evaluation of transportation and other service industry borrowers. Having been a credit union executive and director, Ms. Brooks’ background provides an understanding of consumer credit and regulatory oversight of financial institutions. Ms. Brooks has been a director of Southern Missouri Bancorp and Southern Bank since 2004.
Dennis C. Robison, Age 69. Mr. Robison is a farmer in Butler and Ripley counties in Missouri. He primarily raises soybeans, rice, and wheat. He served on the board of Riceland Foods from 1994 to 2006. As managing partner of two farming operations, his responsibilities have included budgeting, financing, tax planning, and resource and personnel management. His experience as a farmer provides an ability to understand the operations of the Company’s agricultural borrowers, and his experience managing successful farming operations provides insight into general management issues of the Company. Mr. Robison has been a director of Southern Missouri Bancorp and Southern Bank since 2008.
David J. Tooley, Age 74. Mr. Tooley assisted in the staffing and opening of what began as a loan production office and is now a full-service branch for Southern Bank in Springfield, Missouri, from September 2010 through October 2011. He previously was President, CEO and a director of Metropolitan National Bank (MNB) in Springfield, Missouri, serving from February 2001 until his retirement in March 2010. Prior to MNB, he worked at First Savings Bank (FSB) of Mt. Vernon, Missouri. He started at FSB in January 1975 and was employed there until December 31, 1997. He co-managed FSB, and also served on its board of directors. FSB was converted to a publicly traded company in 1993 and subsequently was purchased by Union Planters Bank of Memphis, Tennessee, in 1997. (Union Planters Bank was later merged into Regions Bank.) He also served on the community bank board of Union
Planters after the merger until his employment at MNB. He has over 35 years of management experience at banking institutions. Mr. Tooley has been a director of Southern Missouri Bancorp and Southern Bank since 2011.
David L. McClain, Age 38. Mr. McClain has been the owner and operator of a State Farm Insurance Agency located in Jonesboro, Arkansas since 2021. Prior to that time Mr. McClain was Executive Director of Development for Arkansas State University – Jonesboro (“ASU”), a position he held from 2015 to 2021. From 2011-2015 Mr. McClain was Director of Development for ASU. Mr. McClain is also an Alderman for the Jonesboro City Council serving since 2016. Mr. McClain earned a Bachelor of Science in Management and a Master’s in Public Administration, from ASU. Mr. McClain brings valuable experience in both community relations and business development to the Board. Mr. McClain became a director of Southern Missouri Bancorp and Southern Bank in 2022.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
Information with Respect to the Continuing Directors
In addition to the nominees proposed for re-election on the Board of Directors of the Company, the following individuals are also members of the Company’s Board, each serving for a term ending on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders in the year indicated. The principal occupation and business experience for the last five years and certain other information with respect to each continuing director of the Company is set forth below. The information concerning the continuing directors has been furnished to us by them.
Directors Serving a Term Expiring at the 2024 Annual Meeting.
Greg A. Steffens, Age 56. Mr. Steffens has served as President of Southern Missouri Bancorp since October 2000 and as Chief Executive Officer since 2003. In July 2022, Mr. Steffens became Chairman of the Board of the Company. Prior to being elected President, Mr. Steffens served as Chief Financial Officer of Southern Missouri Bancorp, and President and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Bank. Previously, Mr. Steffens was the Chief Financial Officer of Sho-Me Financial Corp. for four years, and before that Mr. Steffens was employed as a bank examiner with the Office of Thrift Supervision. As Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Steffens brings a special knowledge of the financial, economic, and regulatory challenges the Company faces and is well-suited to educate the Board on these matters. Mr. Steffens has been a director of Southern Missouri Bancorp and Southern Bank since 2000.
L. Douglas Bagby, Age 73. Mr. Bagby served as the City Manager of Poplar Bluff, Missouri from September 2003 until his retirement in June 2014. Previously, he was employed for 14 years as the General Manager of Poplar Bluff Municipal Utilities and had served two earlier years as the Poplar Bluff City Manager. Mr. Bagby also served for six years on the Poplar Bluff R-1 school board. He was Chairman of the Board of the Company through June 30, 2022, and since July 1, 2022 has served as Vice-Chairman of the Board. His background provides expertise in providing deposit services and credit to public units, both directly and through the securities markets. Mr. Bagby has been a director of Southern Missouri Bancorp and Southern Bank since 1997.
Todd E. Hensley, Age 56. Mr. Hensley was formerly Chairman, President, and CEO of Peoples Service Company and its subsidiary, Peoples Banking Company, prior to their acquisition by the Company in August 2014. He also served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Peoples Banking Company’s subsidiary bank, Peoples Bank of the Ozarks. Prior to that, he served as Compliance Officer and General Counsel and also had broad responsibilities for the operations of Peoples Banking Company and its subsidiaries. Now semi-retired, he formerly was an attorney licensed to practice in Missouri and Illinois. He has been involved in the banking industry for over 30 years. Mr. Hensley has been a director of Southern Missouri Bancorp and Southern Bank since 2014.
William Young, Age 56. Mr. Young served as President of Citizens Bank & Trust Company until it was acquired by the Company in 2023. Mr. Young was the fifth generation affiliated with Citizens Bank & Trust Company as a majority shareholder. Mr. Young began his career in banking in 1990 as a loan officer and then concentrated on trust and investment activities beginning in 1993. He served as President or Chairman of Citizens Bank & Trust Company since 1998. Mr. Young also served on the First Community Bank and Great American Bank
Board of Directors. A graduate of the University of Arizona with a Finance Degree, Mr. Young enhanced his banking skills with advanced training in lending at the Missouri School of Commercial Lending and the Graduate School of Banking at the University of Wisconsin. Mr. Young is active in the local community and serves on several local boards. His background provides expertise in providing trust, deposit and credit services directly to the Bank’s customers. Mr. Young has been a director since 2023.
Directors Serving a Term Expiring at the 2025 Annual Meeting.
Sammy A. Schalk, Age 74. Mr. Schalk is the President and principal owner of Gamblin Lumber Company. Mr. Schalk serves on the advisory committee for the Industrial Technology Department of a local junior college and is a member of the City of Poplar Bluff’s municipal utilities advisory board. Mr. Schalk’s experience in the building trades industry provides expertise into the evaluation of commercial and residential real estate lending issues. He was Chairman of the Board of Southern Bank through June 30, 2022 and since July 1, 2022, has served as Vice-Chairman of the Board of Southern Bank. His experience managing a successful business provides insight into general management issues of the Company. Mr. Schalk has been a director of Southern Missouri Bancorp and Southern Bank since 2000.
Charles R. Love, Age 72. Mr. Love is a certified public accountant and retired as a partner with the accounting firm of Kraft, Miles & Tatum, LLC. Mr. Love had been an accountant with Kraft, Miles & Tatum, LLC for 34 years, and has over 49 years of experience in public accounting, including conducting audits and preparing financial statements and tax returns. He brings important technical and financial expertise to the Board, including the ability to understand and explain financial statements and tax returns of borrowers. His varied practice experience provides a knowledge base regarding the area’s economic performance. Mr. Love has been a director of Southern Missouri Bancorp and Southern Bank since 2004.
Daniel L. Jones, Age 58. Mr. Jones is a certified public accountant and founder of Fortune Bank. He served as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer until it was acquired by the Company in February 2022. He started his career at KPMG in the community bank practice of the audit group. After leaving KPMG, he acquired a public accounting firm in Arnold, Missouri, and served as legal director for Eagle Bank & Trust Co. and Midwest Bank Centre. He practiced as a Certified Public Accountant for 20 years. After decades in the financial field, he felt there was a need for a truly community-minded bank in northern Jefferson County, Missouri, and in 2004, he started the process of founding Fortune Bank. In addition to being an active citizen in the community, he also owns DLJ Properties, Inc., a business that develops, constructs, owns and manages commercial real estate. He earned a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Southeast Missouri State University. Mr. Jones became a director of Southern Missouri Bancorp and Southern Bank in 2022.
Board of Directors’ Meetings and Committees and Corporate Governance Matters
Board Meetings
Meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors are generally held on a monthly basis. The Company’s Board of Directors held twelve regular meetings and nine special meetings during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. During fiscal 2023, no director of the Company attended fewer than 75 percent of the aggregate of the total number of Board meetings and the total number of meetings held by the committees of the Board on which committees he or she served during the period in which he or she served.
Board Member Attendance at Annual Meetings
The Company’s policy is for all directors to attend its annual meeting of shareholders, and all directors attended last year’s annual meeting with the exception of William Young, as Mr. Young was appointed to the Board of Directors in January 2023.
Director Independence
The Board has determined that Directors Bagby, Schalk, Brooks, Love, Robison, Tooley, Hensley, and McClain, constituting a majority of the Board members, are “independent directors,” as that term is defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Listing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”). Among other things, when making this
determination, the Board considers each director’s current or previous employment relationships and material transactions or relationships with the Company or the Bank, members of their immediate family and entities in which the director has a significant interest. The purpose of this review is to determine whether any relationships or transactions exist or have occurred that are inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent. Among other matters, in reaching its determination on independence, the Board considered the fact that certain of the directors or their affiliates have borrowed money from the Bank. See “Relationships and Transactions with Executive Officers, Directors and Related Persons.”
Shareholder Communications with Board
Shareholders may communicate directly with the Board of Directors by sending written communications to L. Douglas Bagby, Vice-Chairman, 2991 Oak Grove Road, Poplar Bluff, Missouri 63901.
Board Diversity
BOARD DIVERSITY STATEMENT AND MATRIX
The Company is committed to having a diverse board. In furtherance of this commitment, when considering candidates to fill an open seat on the board, the Nominating Committee will require that the list of candidates include individuals with diversity of experience, race, ethnicity and gender, and special knowledge background or experience relevant to the operations of the Company, including but not limited to: accounting, finance, banking operations, lending, information technology and the operations of a public company, although when directors are added in connection with an acquisition, not all of these factors may be addressed. Any third-party consultant asked to furnish an initial list will be required to include such candidates. The Listing Rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market generally require each NASDAQ listed company to provide statistical information about the Company’s Board of Directors, in a uniform format, related to each director’s self-identified gender, race, and self-identification as LGBTQ+. The following matrix provides the requisite information with respect to our Board of Directors.
| | | | |
Board Diversity Matrix (As of September 8, 2023) |
Total Number of Directors | 11 |
| Female | Male | Non-Binary | Did Not Disclose |
Part I: Gender Identity | |
Directors | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Part II: Demographic Background | |
African American or Black | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Alaskan Native or Native American | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hispanic or Latinx | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
White | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Two or More Races or Ethnicities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LGBTQ+ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Board Members Knowledge, Skills and Experience
The following table summarizes certain of the key areas of expertise and skills that our directors possess. This matrix is not a complete list of each director’s experience and contributions to the Board. Additional details can be found under each director’s biographical information provided above.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | L. Douglas | | Rebecca | | Todd | | Dan | | Charles | | Dennis | | Sammy A. | | Greg | | David | | David | | William |
| | Bagby | | Brooks | | Hensley | | Jones | | Love | | Robison | | Schalk | | Steffens | | Tooley | | McClain | | Young |
Part III: Areas of Expertise | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounting | | | | X | | X | | X | | X | | | | X | | X | | X | | | | |
Finance | | X | | X | | X | | X | | | | X | | X | | X | | X | | | | X |
Banking | | X | | X | | X | | X | | | | | | | | X | | X | | | | X |
Management | | X | | X | | X | | X | | | | X | | X | | X | | X | | X | | X |
Compliance | | X | | X | | X | | | | | | | | | | X | | X | | X | | |
Information Technology | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | |
Lending | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | X | | X | | | | |
Legal | | | | | | X | | | | | | | | | | X | | X | | | | |
Agriculture | | | | | | | | | | X | | X | | | | X | | | | | | |
Real Estate | | X | | X | | | | X | | X | | X | | X | | X | | X | | | | |
Construction | | X | | | | | | X | | X | | X | | X | | X | | X | | | | |
Transportation | | X | | X | | | | | | X | | | | | | X | | X | | | | |
Health care | | X | | X | | | | | | X | | | | | | X | | X | | | | |
Manufacturing | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | X | | | | |
Automotive | | | | | | | | | | X | | | | | | X | | X | | | | |
Hospitality Industry | | | | X | | | | | | X | | | | | | X | | X | | | | |
Public Entities | | X | | | | | | | | | | | | | | X | | X | | | | |
Ethics Code
The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all directors, officers, and employees. You may obtain a copy of the Code free of charge by writing to the Corporate Secretary of the Company, 2991 Oak Grove Road, Poplar Bluff, Missouri 63901 or by calling (573) 778-1800. In addition, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our investor relations website at http://investors.bankwithsouthern.com under “Corporate Overview/Corporate Governance.”
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
In July 2022, we combined the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman into one position. Considering the growth of our organization over recent years, the Board of Directors determined that this structure is appropriate because of the primarily singular operating environment of the Company and Southern Bank, with our predominant focus on being a provider of retail financial services. Having the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman involved in the daily operations of this focused line of business improves the communication between management and the Board and ensures that the Board’s interests are represented in our daily operations, particularly with regard to risk management. Because the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman positions are now combined, the Board of Directors decided to designate a non-management director (currently Mr. Bagby, the former Chairman of the Board) to serve as Vice-Chairman and lead director. The lead director is responsible for presiding over executive sessions of the non-management directors held outside the presence of the Chairman, and for serving as a liaison between the non-management directors and the Chairman.
Risk is inherent with the operation of every financial institution, and how well an institution manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including but not limited to credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, strategic risk and reputation risk. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks we face, while the Board has ultimate responsibility for the oversight of risk management. The Board believes that risk management, including setting appropriate risk limits and monitoring mechanisms, is an integral component and cannot be separated from strategic planning, annual operating planning, and daily management of our business. Consistent with this approach as well as based on the belief that certain risks require an oversight focus that a Board committee can better provide, the Board has delegated the oversight of certain risk areas to certain committees of the Board. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include the consideration of risks in connection with incentive and other compensation programs. See “Board of Directors’ Meetings and Committees and Corporate Governance Matters — Compensation Committee”. These committees regularly provide reports of their activities and recommendations to the full Board. In addition, members of senior management regularly attend meetings of the Board to report to the Board on the primary areas of risk that we face.
Cybersecurity risk is a key consideration in the operation risk management capabilities at Southern Bank. We maintain a formal information security program, which is subject to oversight by, and reporting to, the Information Technology Committee and the Board of Directors. Given the nature of our operations and business, including the Bank’s reliance on relationships with various third-party providers in the delivery of financial services, cybersecurity risk may manifest itself through various business activities and channels, and it is thus considered an enterprise-wide risk that is subject to control and monitoring at various levels of management throughout the Bank. The Information Technology Committee and the Board of Directors oversee and review reports on significant matters related to corporate security, including cybersecurity.
Stock Pledging and Hedging Policies
The Company’s “Insider Trading Policy” among other things, discourages the Company’s directors and executive officers from holding Company stock in a margin account or pledging company stock as collateral for a loan. An exception to this policy may be where a person wishes to pledge Company securities as collateral for a loan (including margin debt) and clearly demonstrates the financial capacity to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities. In addition, the policy prohibits the directors and officers of the Company from using any financial instruments (including without limitation prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds) or otherwise engaging in transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of the Company’s securities owned by the director, executive officer, or employee. Any director or officer wishing to enter into such an arrangement must first preclear the proposed transaction with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and must provide justification for the proposed transaction. As of this date, the Chief Executive Officer has not permitted any director, officer, or employee of the Company to engage in hedging.
Board Committees and Charters
The Board of Directors of the Company has standing Audit, Compensation, and Nominating Committees. The charters for the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee are available on our investor relations website at http://investors.bankwithsouthern.com at “Corporate Overview/Corporate Governance.” You also may obtain a copy of these committee charters free of charge by writing to the Corporate Secretary of the Company, 2991 Oak Grove Road, Poplar Bluff, Missouri 63901 or by calling (573) 778-1800.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is comprised of Directors Love (Chairman), Bagby, Schalk, Brooks, Robison, Tooley, Hensley and McClain, all of whom are “independent directors” under the NASDAQ listing standards. The Board of Directors has determined that Director Love is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(e) of SEC Regulation S-K and that all of the Audit Committee members meet the independence and financial literacy requirements under the NASDAQ listing standards. In fiscal 2023, the Audit Committee met four times.
The Audit Committee is appointed by the Company’s Board of Directors to provide assistance to the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to: the integrity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the accounting and financial reporting processes; the systems of internal accounting and financial controls; compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the Company’s policies; the annual independent audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting; the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence; the performance of the Company’s internal audit department and independent auditors; and any other areas of potential financial risk to the Company specified by its Board of Directors. The Audit Committee is also responsible for hiring, terminating and/or reappointing the Company’s independent auditors, and for reviewing the annual audit prepared by our independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, the functions of the Audit Committee include:
| ● | approving non-audit and audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm; |
| ● | reviewing and approving all related party transactions for potential conflict of interest situations; and |
| ● | reviewing and assessing the adequacy of the Audit Committee Charter on an annual basis. |
the scheduled annual meeting is given by the Company, the shareholder has until the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which notice or public announcement (whichever occurs first) of the date of the scheduled annual meeting was first made by the Company. The shareholder’s notice must include certain other information set forth in the Company’s bylaws. This description is a summary of our nominating process. Any shareholder wishing to propose a director candidate to the Company should review and must comply in full with the procedures set forth in the Company’s articles of incorporation and bylaws and in Missouri law. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, the Nominating Committee met on two occasions for the selection of director nominees, with respect to committee assignments, and for the appointment of officers.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
The Company uses a combination of cash and stock-based compensation to attract and retain qualified persons to serve as non-employee directors of the Company and the Bank. In setting director compensation, the Board of Directors considers the significant amount of time and level of skill required for service on the Boards of the Company and the Bank, particularly due to the duties imposed on directors of public companies and financial institutions. The types and levels of director compensation are annually reviewed and set by the Compensation Committee and ratified by the full Board of Directors.
Each current director of the Company also is a director of the Bank. Directors were compensated at a rate of $1,250 per month for their service on the Company’s Board of Directors. Each director received a monthly fee of $1,250 for serving on the Bank’s Board of Directors. The directors fees have not changed since August, 2021.
Directors Love, Tooley, and Schalk served as members of the regional loan approval committees throughout fiscal 2023. Directors so serving receive a monthly fee of $1,000.
Director Compensation Table for 2023
The table below provides compensation information for each member of our Board of Directors during the year ended June 30, 2023 (except for Mr. Steffens, whose compensation is reported as a named executive officer).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Change in | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Pension Value | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | and Non- | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Qualified | | | | | | |
| | Fees Earned or | | | | | Stock | | Compensation | | All Other | | | |
Name | | Paid in Cash | | Option Awards | | Awards(1) | | Earnings | | Compensation | | Total |
L. Douglas Bagby | | $ | 30,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 23,470 | | $ | 2,503 | | $ | — | | $ | 55,973 |
Sammy A. Schalk | | | 42,000 | | | — | | | 23,470 | | | 2,760 | | | — | | | 68,230 |
Rebecca M. Brooks | | | 30,000 | | | — | | | 23,470 | | | 1,961 | | | — | | | 55,431 |
Daniel L. Jones(2) | | | 30,000 | | | 115,800 | | | 23,470 | | | — | | | — | | | 169,270 |
Charles R. Love | | | 42,000 | | | — | | | 23,470 | | | 2,760 | | | — | | | 68,230 |
Dennis C. Robison | | | 30,000 | | | — | | | 23,470 | | | 5,258 | | | — | | | 58,728 |
David J. Tooley | | | 42,000 | | | — | | | 23,470 | | | 5,561 | | | — | | | 71,031 |
Todd E. Hensley(3) | | | 30,000 | | | — | | | 23,470 | | | 2,320 | | | — | | | 55,790 |
William Young(4) | | | 15,000 | | | 127,050 | | | 23,470 | | | — | | | — | | | 165,520 |
David McClain(5) | | | 22,500 | | | 127,050 | | | 23,470 | | | — | | | — | | | 173,020 |
| (1) | All directors, with the exception of Mr. Steffens, were awarded 500 shares of restricted stock on February 21 2023, granted under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. These shares vest in equal annual installments of 20% beginning February 9, 2024 through February 9, 2028. |
| (2) | Mr. Jones received compensation as a director of the Company and the Bank of $30,000 and as Market Chairman for Southern Bank of $120,000. In addition, he received a total of $88,759.32 as an affiliate of one entity that has a site lease with Southern Bank and that provides maintenance services for properties acquired in connection with the Fortune Financial Corporation merger on July 19, 2022, Mr. Jones was also awarded 7,500 stock options of which 1,500 are currently exercisable. See also. “Relationships and Transactions with Executive Officers, Directors and Related Persons.” |
| (3) | Mr. Hensley has 10, 000 exercisable options. |
| (4) | On February 21, 2023, Mr. Young was granted 7,500 options which vest over a five-year period beginning on February 9, 2024. |
| (5) | On February 21, 2023, Mr. McClain was granted 7,500 options which vest over a five-year period beginning on February 9, 2024. |
Directors’ Retirement Agreements
Southern Bank has entered into individual retirement agreements with each of its directors, with the exception of Mr. Steffens, Mr. Jones, Mr. McClain and Mr. Young. These agreements were entered into in recognition of the directors’ service to the Bank and to ensure their continued service on the Board. Each agreement provides that, following a director’s termination of service on the Board on or after age 60, other than termination for cause, the director will receive five annual payments equal to the product of the cash fees paid to the director during the calendar year preceding his retirement and the director’s vested percentage. The vested percentage is determined as follows: 50% after five years of service, 75% after 10 years of service, and 100% after 15 years of service. The benefits payable under the director’s retirement agreements are unfunded and unsecured obligations of Southern Bank payable solely out of the general assets of Southern Bank.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Introduction
In this section, we provide an overview and analysis of our compensation programs, the material compensation policy decisions we have made under these programs, and the material factors that we considered in making those decisions. Following this section, you will find a series of tables containing specific information about compensation paid or payable to the following individuals, whom we refer to as our “named executive officers.”
| ● | Greg A. Steffens, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (principal executive officer) |
| ● | Matthew T. Funke, President and Chief Administrative Officer (principal financial officer) |
| ● | Justin G. Cox, Executive Vice-President and Regional President (west region) |
| ● | Mark E. Hecker, Executive Vice-President and Chief Credit Officer |
| ● | Rick A. Windes, Executive Vice-President and Chief Lending Officer |
The discussion below is intended to help you understand the detailed information provided in those tables and put that information into context within our overall compensation program.
Executive Summary of Key Compensation Decisions
Our key compensation-related decisions during and subsequent to fiscal 2023 included the following:
| ● | increases in base salaries for our named executive officers during fiscal 2023 of between 0.3 percent and 19.1 percent, based on changing executive responsibilities and the need to stay market competitive and retain personnel who are integral to our continued plans for growth, while also taking into consideration the use of incentive stock options and performance-based restricted stock awards as important components of total compensation; |
| ● | the payment of bonuses based on achievement of key business plan goals during fiscal 2023; and |
| ● | awards of incentive stock options and performance-based restricted stock to our executive officers during fiscal 2023. |
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers our compensation and benefit programs. The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting and administering the policies that govern executive compensation. Our current compensation philosophy is designed to:
| ● | attract the right people and differentiate compensation based on performance; |
| ● | retain top performers and reward them for helping us build and sustain our culture and values and achieve our business strategy and goals; |
| ● | compensate our people in ways that inspire and motivate them, both individually and as a team, to execute our vision and drive for enduring customer satisfaction; |
| ● | provide total compensation, learning, and development opportunities that are competitive with that of other companies of similar size and complexity; |
| ● | properly align risk-taking and compensation; and |
| ● | reward outstanding financial results and shareholder returns over the long-term. |
While the primary components of our compensation program have been base salary, bonuses, stock options, and restricted stock grants, the Compensation Committee also takes into account the full compensation package provided to the individual, including retirement plan benefits, health benefits and other benefits.
The Compensation Committee has established a broad-based compensation program to address compensation for directors, executive officers and other key management employees. The overall goal of this compensation program is to help the Company and the Bank attract, motivate and retain talented and dedicated executives, orient its executives toward the achievement of business goals and link the compensation of its executives to the Company’s success. The Compensation Committee seeks to establish compensation levels that attract highly effective executives who work well as a team. Our overriding principles in setting types and amounts of compensation are:
| ● | Merit/Performance Based – Individual compensation is linked to the successful achievement of performance objectives. |
| ● | Market Competition – Total compensation attracts, retains, and motivates our top performers at a competitive level in our market. |
| ● | Shareholder Value – Compensation components that align the interests of key management, especially the named executive officers, with those of our shareholders in furtherance of our goal to increase shareholder value. |
The Company implements this philosophy by using a combination of cash and stock-based compensation, benefits, and perquisites to attract and retain qualified persons to serve as executive officers of the Company and the Bank. Our compensation program seeks to reach an appropriate balance between base salary (to provide competitive fixed compensation), incentive opportunities in performance-based cash bonuses (to provide rewards for meeting performance goals) and equity compensation (to align our executives’ interests with our shareholders’ interests). Each executive officer of the Company also is an executive officer of the Bank. Executive officers are not compensated separately for their service to the Company, with the exception of Mr. Steffens’ receipt of fees for service on the board of directors of the Company and Bank, and Mr. Funke’s receipt of fees for service on the board of directors of the Bank. The Compensation Committee considers the significant amount of time and level of skill required to perform the required duties of each executive’s position, taking into account the complexity of our business as a public company and regulated financial institution, and informally reviews peer compensation data.
Base Salaries
We provide the opportunity for our named executive officers and other officers to earn a competitive base salary. We do so in order to attract and retain appropriate talent for the position. Our base salary reflects a combination of factors, including competitive pay levels, the executive’s experience and tenure, and the executive’s individual
performance and responsibilities. We review salary levels annually to recognize these factors. We do not target base salary at any particular percentage of total compensation.
During fiscal 2023, Mr. Steffens received an increase in base salary from $438,500 to $439,800; Mr. Funke received an increase in base salary from $264,500 to $315,100; Mr. Cox received an increase in base salary from $271,500 to $285,100; Mr. Hecker received an increase in base salary from $267,500 to $280,100; and Mr. Windes received an increase in base salary from $268,500 to $284,900. Increases during fiscal 2023 reflected changing executive responsibilities, increased use of incentive stock options and performance-based restricted stock, the need to retain key management personnel, including top performers, and recognition of the growing complexity of our Company and increasing responsibilities of our executive officers.
Bonuses
The Company does not have a written cash bonus plan in place for executive officers. For fiscal 2021, 2022 and 2023, all named executive officers received discretionary cash bonuses. In determining the amount of cash bonuses to award, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors primarily consider the Company’s results in comparison to business plan targets for such measures as tangible return on tangible common equity, earnings per share growth, net interest margin, noninterest income, and noninterest expense, as well as accomplishment of strategic objectives such as growth, entry to new markets, capitalization, and other factors. Generally, our Compensation Committee has viewed as a guideline a potential bonus payment of up to 25% of base salary and determined individual executive officer bonus amounts based both on accomplishment of these strategic objectives, as well as individual performance in achieving identified individualized goals. The Compensation Committee also holds 50% of each fiscal year’s bonus for payout at the conclusion of the following fiscal year, as both a retention incentive and to discourage excessive risk-taking on the part of our executive management team.
Impact of Tax and Accounting
As a general matter, the Compensation Committee takes into account the various tax and accounting implications of the compensation vehicles employed by the Company.
Stock Awards
Stock option and performance-based stock awards have been an integral part of our executive compensation program. They are intended to encourage ownership and retention of Company stock by key employees as well as non-employee members of the board of directors.
2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. In fiscal 2017, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The purpose of the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan is to promote the long-term success, and enhance the long-term value, of the Company by linking the personal interests of employees and directors with those of Company shareholders. The 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to the Company in its ability to motivate, attract, and retain the services of employees and directors upon whose judgment, interest, and special effort the successful conduct of its operation largely is dependent, in a manner that does not expose the Company to imprudent risks and that is consistent with the long-term health of the Company.
As a result of the adoption of the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, no further awards are being made under the existing plans described below, and shares of common stock reserved to make new awards under those plans have been released, provided that shares of Company common stock reserved to fund issued and outstanding awards under the existing Plans will continue to be reserved to provide for those awards. Currently there are 70,525 shares available for award under the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, against which limit full value share awards (meaning awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights) are counted on a 2.5-for-1 basis. Option grants and performance-based restricted stock awards made during fiscal 2023 to the named executive officers are contained in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. As required by the plan, stock options have an exercise price that is equal to no less than the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, which is the date on which the Board of Directors ratifies the Compensation Committee’s approval of the grant. To provide an incentive for a sustained increase in the value of our common stock, stock options granted to employees typically do not begin
vesting until the first anniversary of the grant date, with 20% of the option vesting on each anniversary date thereafter through the fifth anniversary date.
2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. The purpose of the 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan was to promote the long-term success of the Company and increase shareholder value by attracting and retaining key employees and directors and encouraging directors and key employees to focus on long-range objectives. The Company reserved 200,000 shares (split-adjusted) for option awards under this plan, plus additional shares repurchased with the proceeds of options exercised or surrendered to pay an option exercise price. Option awards were discretionary and were based on an assessment of the participant’s position, years of service, and contribution to the success and growth of the Company. The plan provided for the award of incentive stock options to qualifying employees under the federal tax laws. Stock awards under the plan generally have vested in equal installments over five years from the date of grant and must be exercised within 10 years. The exercise price of options awarded has always been the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Following the adoption of the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan, no shares are available for future awards under the 2003 Stock Option Plan.
Other Benefits
The Company provides benefits, including a 401(k) retirement plan and health care benefits, to all employees to attract and retain highly effective executives and other employees with an opportunity to maintain a quality standard of living over time and to have access to health care and save for retirement. These benefits are administered consistently to all levels of the organization. All employees share in the cost of health benefits based on the coverage they select. Available health care benefits are commensurate with those available in our market area.
The Company provides perquisites designed to enhance the success of the Company. Executive officer education is provided at industry conferences, seminars, and schools. Dues to country clubs, social clubs and service organizations are paid to encourage community involvement and build business relationships.
Employment Agreement
On November 8, 2019, Mr. Steffens entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with the Bank (the “Employment Agreement”). The Employment Agreement amended and restated Mr. Steffens’ prior employment agreement with the Bank in order to ensure compliance with 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, lengthen the term of the agreement and make certain other changes. The Employment Agreement provided for an initial term that ended on December 31, 2022, and provides for an extension of one year, in addition to the then-remaining term, on each January 1, beginning January 1, 2021, as long as (1) the Bank has not notified Mr. Steffens in writing at least 90 days in advance that the term will not be extended further and (2) prior to each such anniversary, the Board of Directors of the Bank explicitly reviews and approves the extension.
The Employment Agreement provides for an annual base salary at least equal to Mr. Steffens’ salary in effect as of November 8, 2019 ($378,000), provided that any salary actually paid to Mr. Steffens by any subsidiary or affiliate of the Bank shall reduce the amount to be paid to Mr. Steffens by the Bank. The Employment Agreement also provides for participation in benefit plans and the receipt of fringe benefits in which the Bank’s executives participate and participation in any discretionary bonuses awarded to executive officers of the Bank. In addition, Mr. Steffens is entitled to reimbursement for all reasonable expenses incurred in his capacity as Chairman of the Bank.
Under the Employment Agreement, if Mr. Steffens’s employment is “involuntarily terminated” (as defined in the Employment Agreement) and Mr. Steffens has offered to continue to provide the services contemplated by and on the terms provided in the Employment Agreement and such offer has been declined, then during the remaining term of the agreement, Mr. Steffens will be entitled to receive (1) monthly payments equal to 1/12th of his annual salary and 1/12th of his average annual amount of cash bonus and cash incentive compensation for the two full calendar years preceding the date of termination; (2) continuation of specified health insurance benefits for Mr. Steffens and his dependents until their death or the expiration of the remaining term of the agreement (whichever occurs first); (3) continuation of specified other insurance benefits until Mr. Steffens’ death or the expiration of the remaining term of the agreement (whichever occurs first); and (4) if the involuntary termination occurs within the 12
months preceding, at the time of, or within 24 months after a change in control of the Company or the Bank, an amount in cash equal to 299% of Mr. Steffens’ “base amount” (as defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code).
If the payments and benefits Mr. Steffens has the right to receive from the Bank and the Company would constitute a “parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, then the payments and benefits will be reduced by the minimum amount necessary to result in no portion of the payments and benefits payable by the Bank under the Employment Agreement being non-deductible to the Bank pursuant to Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.
In the event of Mr. Steffens’ death, his estate or designated beneficiary would be entitled to receive his salary through the last day of the calendar month in which Mr. Steffens died. If Mr. Steffens should become disabled or otherwise unable to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank, he shall be entitled to receive group and other disability income provided by the Bank for its executive officers.
Change-in-Control Agreements
The Bank maintains change-in-control severance agreements with Messrs. Funke, Cox, Hecker and Windes.
Each agreement provides that on each December 31st, the term of the agreement is extended for a period of one additional year unless either the Bank or the executive has given notice to the other party in writing at least 60 days prior to such annual renewal date that the term of the agreement will not be extended; however, if a change in control occurs during the term of the agreement, then the remaining term of the agreement shall be automatically extended until the one-year anniversary of the completion of the Change in Control.
Under each agreement, if the executive’s employment is terminated in connection with or within one year following a change in control of the Company or the Bank by (1) the Bank other than for cause, disability, retirement or as a result of the executive’s death or by (2) the executive for “Good Reason,” as defined in the agreement, the executive will be entitled to receive in a lump sum within five business days following the date of termination, a cash severance amount equal to two times the executive’s “base amount,” as defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, in the case of Messrs. Funke and Cox. Under their agreements, Messrs. Hecker and Windes will be entitled to receive in a lump sum within five business days following the date of termination, a cash severance amount equal to two times, in the case of Mr. Hecker, or one and one half times in the case of Mr. Windes, their cash compensation, which is defined to include base salary and other cash compensation. In addition, each executive will receive (1) for a specified period following the date of termination (two years in the case of Messrs. Funke, Cox and Hecker and 18 months in the case of Mr. Windes) or (2) until the date of the executive’s full-time employment with another employer at no cost to the executive, the continued participation by the executive (including the executive’s dependents who are covered by the Bank at the time of termination) in all group insurance, life insurance, health, dental, vision and accident insurance and disability insurance plans offered by the Bank in which the executive and his covered dependents were participating immediately prior to the date of termination.
In the event that the continued participation of the executive and his covered dependents in any group insurance plan is barred or would trigger the payment of an excise tax under Section 4980D of the Internal Revenue Code then the Bank will either (1) arrange to provide the executive and his covered dependents with alternative benefits substantially similar to those which the executive then currently receives, provided the alternative benefits do not trigger the payment of an excise tax, or (2) pay to the executive within 10 business days following the date of termination, a lump sum cash amount equal to the projected cost of the benefits to the Bank until the two-year anniversary of the date of termination in the case of Messrs. Funke, Cox and Hecker, and until the eighteen-month anniversary of the date of termination in the case of Mr. Windes.
If the payments and benefits any of the executives have the right to receive from the Bank and the Company would constitute a “parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, then the payments and benefits will be reduced by the minimum amount necessary to result in no portion of the payments
Tax Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, generally disallows a tax deduction for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee reviews and considers the potential consequences of Section 162(m) to the Company. Effective for 2018 and future years, H.R. 1, originally known as the “Tax Cut and Jobs Act,” amended Section 162(m) to provide that qualified performance-based compensation will be subject to the $1.0 million deduction limit, subject to grandfathering of amounts payable under certain agreements in effect on November 2, 2017. The Company reserves the right to use our judgment to authorize compensation to any employee that does not comply with the Section 162(m) exemptions for compensation we believe is appropriate.
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code provides that severance payments triggered by a change in control, which equal or exceed three times the individual’s base amount are deemed to be “excess parachute payments.” Individuals receiving parachute payments in excess of three times their base amount are subject to a 20% excise tax on the amount of the excess payments. If excess parachute payments are made, the Company and the Bank would not be entitled to deduct the amount of the excess payments. Mr. Steffens’s employment agreement and the change in control severance agreements with our other named executive officers provide that severance and other payments that are subject to a change in control will be reduced as much as necessary to ensure that no amounts payable to the executive will be considered excess parachute payments.
CEO Pay Ratio
As required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and the SEC’s implementing rules, the following information about the relationship of the compensation of our CEO, Mr. Steffens, to the compensation of our median employee (the “Pay Ratio’) is set forth below. The Pay Ratio is a reasonable estimate determined in a manner consistent with the SEC’s rules.
For 2023, our last completed fiscal year:
| (i) | The annual total compensation of our median employee was $36,230. |
| (ii) | The annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the 2023 Summary Compensation Table on page 20, was $661,141. |
| (iii) | The ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation for our median employee was 18.2 to 1. |
We determine our median employee, exclusive of the Chief Executive Officer, based on annual total cash compensation, consisting of base salary (annualized in the case of full and part-time employees) plus bonuses paid during fiscal 2023. Our median employee would also generally participate in benefit plans, most notably our group health insurance plan and 401(k) retirement plan, which benefits are not included in the annual total cash compensation figure reported above. Given the different methodologies that various public companies use to determine an estimate of their pay ratio, the estimated ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.
PROPOSAL II -- ADVISORY (NON-BINDING)
VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
We are including in this proxy statement an advisory vote on executive compensation in order to give shareholders an opportunity to indicate whether or not they endorse the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement. The proposal will be presented at the annual meeting as a resolution in substantially the following form:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the annual meeting pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby approved.
This vote will not be binding on the Company’s Board of Directors. Nor will it affect any compensation previously paid or awarded to any executive. The Compensation Committee and the Board may, however, take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
As disclosed in more detail under “Executive Compensation,” the Compensation Committee has a very deliberate and thoughtful process for establishing a broad-based compensation program for our executives. The overall goal of this compensation program is to help the Company and the Bank attract, motivate, and retain talented and dedicated executives, orient its executives toward the achievement of business goals, and link the compensation of its executives to the Company’s success. Executive compensation determinations are a complex and demanding process. The Compensation Committee exercises great care and discipline in its analysis and decision-making and recognizes our shareholders’ interest in executive compensation practices. The Compensation Committee seeks to establish compensation levels that attract highly effective executives who work well as a team and that are aligned with our corporate values to conduct our business with character, compassion, class, and competitiveness. A primary focus of our compensation program is to compensate actual performance, using realistic objectives while not exposing the Company to imprudent levels of risk.
The Board of Directors believes that our executive compensation program comports with the objectives described above and therefore recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” this proposal.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The following Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or to be incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent Southern Missouri Bancorp specifically incorporates this Report therein, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the full Board of Directors. In fulfilling its oversight responsibility of reviewing the services performed by Southern Missouri Bancorp’s independent auditors, the Audit Committee, composed of the undersigned directors, each of whom is independent as independence is defined for audit committee members under NASDAQ’s listing standards, carefully reviews the policies and procedures for the engagement of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee also discussed with Southern Missouri Bancorp’s independent auditors the overall scope and plans for the audit. The Audit Committee met with the independent auditors to discuss the results of its audit, the evaluation of Southern Missouri Bancorp’s internal controls, and the overall quality of Southern Missouri Bancorp’s financial reporting.
the Audit Committee considered whether the providing of services (and the aggregate fees billed for those services) by FORVIS, LLP, other than audit services, is compatible with maintaining the independence of the outside accountants.
Audit Fees
For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, FORVIS, LLP provided various audit and audit-related services to the Company. Set forth below are the aggregate fees billed for these services:
| (a) | Audit Fees: Aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements: $479,757 – 2023 and $333,958 – 2022. Audit fees consist of fees related to the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, review of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and related proxy statement and services normally provided by the independent auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements such as Registration Statements and current reports on Form 8-K. |
| (b) | Audit Related Fees: Aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered related to audit of the Company’s 401(k) Retirement Plan, work performed in connection with registration statements, and consultation on accounting matters: $26,691 – 2023 and $24,548 – 2022. |
| (c) | Tax Related Fees: Aggregate fees billed for professional services related to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning: $177,005 – 2023 and $125,010 – 2022. |
The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors and the estimated fees for these services. None of the services provided by FORVIS, LLP described in items (a), (b) and (c) above was approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to a waiver of the pre-approval requirements of the SEC’s rules and regulations. The Audit Committee may establish pre-approval policies and procedures, as permitted by applicable law and SEC regulations and consistent with its charter for the engagement of the independent auditors to render permissible non-audit services to the Company, provided that any pre-approvals delegated to one or more members of the committee are reported to the committee at its next scheduled meeting. At this time, the Audit Committee has not adopted any pre-approval policies.
PROPOSAL III -- RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Audit Committee has appointed FORVIS, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024, subject to ratification of the appointment by the Company’s shareholders at the Annual Meeting. A representative of FORVIS, LLP is expected to attend the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires.
Although not required by the Company’s bylaws or otherwise, the Audit Committee and the Company’s Board of Directors believe it is appropriate, as a matter of good corporate governance, to request that the Company’s shareholders ratify the appointment of FORVIS, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2024 fiscal year. If the appointment of FORVIS, LLP is not ratified by the shareholders, the Audit Committee may appoint another independent registered public accounting firm or may decide to maintain its appointment of FORVIS, LLP.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF FORVIS, LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR THE COMPANY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2024.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Southern Missouri Bancorp’s annual report to shareholders, including financial statements, has been mailed to all shareholders of record as of the close of business on the record date. Any shareholder who has not received a copy of the annual report may obtain a copy by writing to the Secretary of Southern Missouri Bancorp. The annual report is not to be treated as part of the proxy solicitation material or as having been incorporated herein by reference.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
In order to be eligible for inclusion in Southern Missouri Bancorp’s proxy materials for next year’s annual meeting of shareholders, any shareholder proposal to take action at such meeting must be received at Southern Missouri Bancorp’s main office at 2991 Oak Grove Road, Poplar Bluff, Missouri, no later than May 28, 2024. If, however, the date of the Company’s next annual meeting of shareholders is before September 30, 2024 or after November 29, 2024, any such proposal must be received at the Company’s main office a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and send its proxy materials for that meeting to be eligible for inclusion in those proxy materials. Any such proposals shall be subject to the requirements of the proxy rules adopted under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
In addition to the deadline and other requirements referred to above for submitting a shareholder proposal to be included in the Company’s proxy materials for its next annual meeting of shareholders, the Company’s bylaws require a separate notification to be made in order for a shareholder proposal to be eligible for presentation at the meeting, regardless of whether the proposal is included in the Company’s proxy materials for the meeting. In order to be eligible for presentation at the Company’s next annual meeting of shareholders, written notice of a shareholder proposal containing the information specified in Article II, Section 15(a) of the Company’s bylaws must be received by the Secretary of the Company not earlier than the close of business on July 2, 2024 and not later than the close of business on August 1, 2024. If, however, the date of the next annual meeting is before October 10, 2024 or after December 29, 2024, the notice of the shareholder proposal must instead be received by the Company’s Secretary not earlier than the close of business on the 120th calendar day prior to the date of the next annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th calendar day before the date of the next annual meeting or the tenth calendar day following the first to occur of the day on which notice of the date of the next annual meeting is mailed or otherwise transmitted or the day on which public announcement of the date of the next annual meeting is first made by the Company.
Shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees in connection with the Company’s next annual meeting of shareholders must provide notice to the Company that contains the information required by Rule 14a-19(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, no later than August 31, 2024. If, however, the date of the Company’s next annual meeting of shareholders is before September 30, 2024 or after November 29, 2024, the notice must be provided by the later of 60 calendar days prior to the date of the annual meeting or the tenth calendar day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting is first made by the Company. This notice is in addition to the notice required under Article II, Section 15(b) of the Company’s bylaws for shareholders desiring to submit director nominations, which must contain the information specified in Article II, Section 15(b) and be received by the Secretary of the Company not less than 90 calendar days or more than 120 calendar days prior to the date of the Company’s next annual meeting of shareholders. If, however, less than 100 calendar days’ notice or public announcement of the date of the next annual meeting is given or made to shareholders, notice pursuant to Article II, Section 15(b) must instead be received by the Company’s Secretary by the tenth calendar day following the first to occur of the day on which notice of the date of the next annual meeting is mailed or otherwise transmitted or the day on which public announcement of the date of the next annual meeting is first made by the Company.
OTHER MATTERS
We are not aware of any business to come before the annual meeting other than those matters described in this proxy statement. However, if any other matter should properly come before the meeting, it is intended that holders of the proxies will act in accordance with their best judgment.
Pay vs Performance Disclosure
|
12 Months Ended |
|
Jun. 30, 2023
USD ($)
$ / shares
|
Jun. 30, 2022
USD ($)
$ / shares
|
Jun. 30, 2021
USD ($)
$ / shares
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Value of Initial Fixed $100 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Investment Based on: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Average | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Summary | | Average | | | | | | | | | Diluted | | | Summary | | | | | Compensation | | Compensation | | | | Peer Group | | | | | Earnings | | | Compensation | | Compensation | | Table Total | | Actually Paid | | Total | | Total | | Net Income | | Per | | | Table Total for | | Actually Paid | | for Non-PEO | | to Non-PEO | | Shareholder | | Shareholder | | (in thousands) | | Common | | | PEO(1) | | to PEO(2) | | NEOs(3) | | NEOs(4) | | Return(5) | | Return(6) | | (7) | | Share(8) | 2023 | | $ | 661,141 | | $ | 572,862 | | $ | 488,862 | | $ | 424,478 | | 167.21 | | 116.10 | | $ | 39,237 | | 3.85 | 2022 | | | 651,898 | | | 648,187 | | | 388,627 | | | 386,517 | | 193.14 | | 143.56 | | | 47,169 | | 5.21 | 2021 | | | 595,934 | | | 830,649 | | | 353,265 | | | 474,380 | | 188.77 | | 162.61 | | | 47,180 | | 5.22 |
| (1) | Represents the total compensation of our principal executive officer (“PEO”), Greg A. Steffens, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) for each year indicated. Refer to the “Summary Compensation Table” above. Mr. Steffens served as our PEO during those years. |
| (2) | Represents the amount of “compensation actually paid” to Mr. Steffens, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. Steffens during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to Mr. Steffens’s total compensation for each year to determine the compensation actually paid: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | Total compensation as reported in SCT | | $ | 661,141 | | $ | 651,898 | | $ | 595,934 | | | | | | | | | | | Fair value of equity awards granted during covered fiscal year | | | (77,555) | | | (84,006) | | | (87,872) | Fair value of equity awards granted in covered fiscal year and that were unvested at end of such covered fiscal year - valued at year-end | | | 56,588 | | | 68,008 | | | 138,552 | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to end of covered fiscal year for awards made in prior fiscal years that were unvested at end of current fiscal year | | | (44,694) | | | 8,761 | | | 133,187 | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to vesting date for awards made in prior fiscal years that vested during covered fiscal year | | | (22,618) | | | 3,526 | | | 50,818 | Total compensation actually paid to PEO | | $ | 572,862 | | $ | 648,187 | | $ | 830,649 |
| (3) | Represents the average of the total compensation of each of our non-PEO NEOs as reported in the SCT for each year indicated. The non-PEO NEOs included in this calculation for each year are Matt Funke, Justin Cox, Mark Hecker and Rick Windes. |
| (4) | Represents the average of the total compensation actually paid to our named non-PEO NEOs as reported in the SCT, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to the non-PEO NEOs during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to average total compensation for the non-PEO NEOs as a group for each year to determine the compensation actually paid: |
Reconciliation of Non-PEO NEOs SCT Total and Compensation Actually Paid | | | | | | | | | | | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | Total compensation as reported in SCT | | $ | 488,862 | | $ | 388,627 | | $ | 353,265 | | | | | | | | | | | Fair value of equity awards granted during covered fiscal year | | | (111,725) | | | (46,098) | | | (48,516) | Fair value of equity awards granted in covered fiscal year and that were unvested at end of such covered fiscal year - valued at year-end | | | 84,409 | | | 37,184 | | | 77,736 | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to end of covered fiscal year for awards made in prior fiscal years that were unvested at end of current fiscal year | | | (24,802) | | | 4,922 | | | 67,595 | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to vesting date for awards made in prior fiscal years that vested during covered fiscal year | | | (12,266) | | | 1,882 | | | 24,300 | Total average compensation actually paid to non-PEO NEOs | | $ | 424,478 | | $ | 386,517 | | $ | 474,380 |
| (5) | Represents the cumulative three-year total return to shareholders of our common stock and assumes that the value of the investment was $100 on June 30, 2020 and that the subsequent dividends were reinvested. The stock price performance included in this column is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. |
| (6) | Represents a cumulative three-year total return to shareholders of a peer group calculated using the same method described in footnote (5). For all years listed, the peer group used is the S&P U.S. BMI Banks Midwest Region Index. |
| (7) | Represents our reported net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for each year indicated. |
| (8) | Represents our diluted earnings per common share, for each year indicated, which we believe represents the most important financial performance measure that was used to link compensation actually paid to our PEO and non-PEO NEOs for the most recent fiscal year to Company performance. |
|
|
|
| Company Selected Measure Name |
diluted earnings per common share
|
|
|
| Named Executive Officers, Footnote |
| (1) | Represents the total compensation of our principal executive officer (“PEO”), Greg A. Steffens, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) for each year indicated. Refer to the “Summary Compensation Table” above. Mr. Steffens served as our PEO during those years. |
| (3) | Represents the average of the total compensation of each of our non-PEO NEOs as reported in the SCT for each year indicated. The non-PEO NEOs included in this calculation for each year are Matt Funke, Justin Cox, Mark Hecker and Rick Windes. |
|
|
|
| Peer Group Issuers, Footnote |
| (6) | Represents a cumulative three-year total return to shareholders of a peer group calculated using the same method described in footnote (5). For all years listed, the peer group used is the S&P U.S. BMI Banks Midwest Region Index. |
|
|
|
| PEO Total Compensation Amount |
$ 661,141
|
$ 651,898
|
$ 595,934
|
| PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount |
$ 572,862
|
648,187
|
830,649
|
| Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote |
| (2) | Represents the amount of “compensation actually paid” to Mr. Steffens, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to Mr. Steffens during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to Mr. Steffens’s total compensation for each year to determine the compensation actually paid: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | Total compensation as reported in SCT | | $ | 661,141 | | $ | 651,898 | | $ | 595,934 | | | | | | | | | | | Fair value of equity awards granted during covered fiscal year | | | (77,555) | | | (84,006) | | | (87,872) | Fair value of equity awards granted in covered fiscal year and that were unvested at end of such covered fiscal year - valued at year-end | | | 56,588 | | | 68,008 | | | 138,552 | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to end of covered fiscal year for awards made in prior fiscal years that were unvested at end of current fiscal year | | | (44,694) | | | 8,761 | | | 133,187 | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to vesting date for awards made in prior fiscal years that vested during covered fiscal year | | | (22,618) | | | 3,526 | | | 50,818 | Total compensation actually paid to PEO | | $ | 572,862 | | $ | 648,187 | | $ | 830,649 |
|
|
|
| Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount |
$ 488,862
|
388,627
|
353,265
|
| Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount |
$ 424,478
|
386,517
|
474,380
|
| Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote |
| (4) | Represents the average of the total compensation actually paid to our named non-PEO NEOs as reported in the SCT, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to the non-PEO NEOs during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to average total compensation for the non-PEO NEOs as a group for each year to determine the compensation actually paid: |
Reconciliation of Non-PEO NEOs SCT Total and Compensation Actually Paid | | | | | | | | | | | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | Total compensation as reported in SCT | | $ | 488,862 | | $ | 388,627 | | $ | 353,265 | | | | | | | | | | | Fair value of equity awards granted during covered fiscal year | | | (111,725) | | | (46,098) | | | (48,516) | Fair value of equity awards granted in covered fiscal year and that were unvested at end of such covered fiscal year - valued at year-end | | | 84,409 | | | 37,184 | | | 77,736 | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to end of covered fiscal year for awards made in prior fiscal years that were unvested at end of current fiscal year | | | (24,802) | | | 4,922 | | | 67,595 | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to vesting date for awards made in prior fiscal years that vested during covered fiscal year | | | (12,266) | | | 1,882 | | | 24,300 | Total average compensation actually paid to non-PEO NEOs | | $ | 424,478 | | $ | 386,517 | | $ | 474,380 |
|
|
|
| Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return |
The following graphs show the relationship between the compensation actually paid to our PEO and the average of the compensation actually paid to our other NEOs to our total shareholder return, net income and diluted earnings per common share and the relationship between our cumulative total shareholder return and the cumulative total shareholder return of the peer group, each over the three most recently completed fiscal years as reported in the table above: 
|
|
|
| Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income |
|
|
|
| Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure |
|
|
|
| Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group |
|
|
|
| Tabular List, Table |
Financial Performance Measures Used to Link Executive Compensation to Company Performance The following list presents the most important financial measures, as determined by the Compensation Committee, used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to our NEOs, for fiscal year 2023, to the Company’s performance: | ● | Diluted earnings per common share |
| ● | Tangible return on average tangible common equity |
| ● | Return on average assets |
| ● | Non-performing asset ratio |
|
|
|
| Total Shareholder Return Amount |
$ 167.21
|
193.14
|
188.77
|
| Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount |
116.10
|
143.56
|
162.61
|
| Net Income (Loss) |
$ 39,237,000
|
$ 47,169,000
|
$ 47,180,000
|
| Company Selected Measure Amount | $ / shares |
3.85
|
5.21
|
5.22
|
| PEO Name |
Greg A. Steffens
|
|
|
| Measure:: 1 |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Name |
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
|
| Non-GAAP Measure Description |
| (8) | Represents our diluted earnings per common share, for each year indicated, which we believe represents the most important financial performance measure that was used to link compensation actually paid to our PEO and non-PEO NEOs for the most recent fiscal year to Company performance. |
|
|
|
| Measure:: 2 |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Name |
Tangible return on average tangible common equity
|
|
|
| Measure:: 3 |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Name |
Return on average assets
|
|
|
| Measure:: 4 |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Name |
Net interest margin
|
|
|
| Measure:: 5 |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Name |
Non-performing asset ratio
|
|
|
| PEO | Fair value of equity awards granted during covered fiscal year |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
$ (77,555)
|
$ (84,006)
|
$ (87,872)
|
| PEO | Fair value of equity awards granted in covered fiscal year and that were unvested at end of such covered fiscal year - valued at year-end |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
56,588
|
68,008
|
138,552
|
| PEO | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to end of covered fiscal year for awards made in prior fiscal years that were unvested at end of current fiscal year |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(44,694)
|
8,761
|
133,187
|
| PEO | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to vesting date for awards made in prior fiscal years that vested during covered fiscal year |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(22,618)
|
3,526
|
50,818
|
| Non-PEO NEO | Fair value of equity awards granted during covered fiscal year |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(111,725)
|
(46,098)
|
(48,516)
|
| Non-PEO NEO | Fair value of equity awards granted in covered fiscal year and that were unvested at end of such covered fiscal year - valued at year-end |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
84,409
|
37,184
|
77,736
|
| Non-PEO NEO | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to end of covered fiscal year for awards made in prior fiscal years that were unvested at end of current fiscal year |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
(24,802)
|
4,922
|
67,595
|
| Non-PEO NEO | Change in fair value from end of prior fiscal year to vesting date for awards made in prior fiscal years that vested during covered fiscal year |
|
|
|
| Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
| Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
$ (12,266)
|
$ 1,882
|
$ 24,300
|