4retire
1 week ago
Stewguts I think you are brilliant, not kidding. Your posts are always well written. You are the most loyal shareholder that I have ever come across. Even when you know things may be going off the rails you stay positive and hopeful on TMM. I did the same for years until I realized I was being lied to by their CEO. The hard part is I had already put a lot of money (for me) into TMM shares.
I’ve always enjoyed your posts. The problem is when I became quizzical and started asking questions about the validity of what TMM was releasing in PRs, I was always facing an interrogation with our posts. Interrogations quickly turned into bullying.
I no longer own TMM shares and shouldn’t even come on this board. I guess it’s either muscle memory or my curiosity if some of my former fellow posters are still here; ala, Jay14, Nesurk, Mike 1991, you, etc. I truly hope TMM will find success, just as I now hope Dimension will boom. There’s room for both…..if they ever leave the courthouse.
Stewguts
1 week ago
"I bought one share of stock from a DFMI shareholder to attend a DFMI shareholder gathering that Mike Fernandez was addressing in Anaheim, CA.about 13 years ago."
So I understand correctly this meeting took place in Anaheim in 2011? Which DFMI shareholders were present at this meeting?
"You got me. I owned a total of one share that I paid $1 for."
Ah yes, you stubbornly refused to tell us about that one share that you owned for months on end. So how about since then honest Bill, did you increase your ownership in DFMI?
"The Raytheon instance, I didn’t have a sell order established with my broker at the time. The great leap, then descent in price seemed to happen over a short period of time….if I recall it wasn’t even a 24 hour period."
The ladder Bill, the ladder, you keep forgetting about the ladder Bill.
"My cohorts, at that time, were fellow TMM shareholders"
Sure Bill sure, whatever you say.
4retire
1 week ago
Stewguts you certainly seem to constantly have information that’s not open to others. Good for you. In reading TMM’s message board from time to time, most are just asking for information on what’s going on with their investment. You seem to be the most informed TMM investor that I’ve seen in the 24 years I’ve owned, sold and still check on the TMM board.
Your information on CodeBaby wasn’t known by others. I never heard the competitor was calling Raytheon saying they owned the TMM technology. That was, to my knowledge, never made public. You’ve been here a very long time. You’ve worked very hard policing what you think are hurtful posts. If you’ve gained the trust, confidence and insider position, good for you. Others just want information…just like I did when I was a TMM shareholder
4retire
1 week ago
I bought one share of stock from a DFMI shareholder to attend a DFMI shareholder gathering that Mike Fernandez was addressing in Anaheim, CA.about 13 years ago. You got me. I owned a total of one share that I paid $1 for. In that meeting Fernandez offered everyone there (except me) board member positions for TMM. He was angry that I was there. Why would the CEO of TMM get angry that a fairly sizable TMM shareholder would hear what he was saying?????
The Raytheon instance, I didn’t have a sell order established with my broker at the time. The great leap, then descent in price seemed to happen over a short period of time….if I recall it wasn’t even a 24 hour period. My cohorts, at that time, were fellow TMM shareholders
Stewguts
1 week ago
"I posted when I was going to buy Dimension shares.",
Firstly, I won't waste my time sifting through all your disingenuous posts to find your evasive responses. When asked directly whether you were an investor in DFMI, you consistently avoided giving a straightforward yes or no answer. While you often boasted about your savvy investments, you steadfastly refused to disclose if you owned shares of DFMI, insisting that it's no one's business what you do or don't own.
"Yes, unfortunately I was in a refinery with no phone access during their second best fraud ulent pump. Missed cashing out in the high $.20s. I’m sure the insiders made a bundle on the Raytheon situation"
Ah yes, I remember that well. You were stuck up on that ladder when the Raytheon news release hit. That's when your fellow cohorts went to work harassing Raytheon IR with claims of ownership of TMMI's proprietary technology.
"I’m sure the insiders made a bundle on the Raytheon situation"
There you go again with your insinuations. The "insiders" were dumbstruck by how the stock got hammered on what was arguably the best news to have come out of TMMI in years. Unfortunately, I was not in the loop to explain that the stock had just come under attack by the naked short cabal to prevent the stock from getting traction which would have led to a massive short squeeze.
Stewguts
1 week ago
Interesting. It appears you spoke with CodeBaby, which evolved from Geppetto Avatars. If I recall correctly, they received approximately $200,000 from TMMI, a company they seem reluctant to associate with. Given this transaction, it seems TMMI got the short end of the stick, especially considering the unimpressive avatars showcased on CodeBaby's website. These demos use outdated open-source code, which doesn't reflect well on the investment. Perhaps TMMI should consider asking for their money back.
Still shaking my head over that one.
jay14
1 week ago
Litigation has nothing to do with
releasing any current news on the future of TMMI!!!!
Yes, court battle continues, but
TMMI shareholders are only asking
whether or not TMMI technology
is still in the game!!!!
Susan Bala wants to keep any possible deals to herself, if true, okay, but release basic information
on the status of TMMI technology!!!!
TMMI quote:
While there is not much that can publicly be said about it....
Tell us what can be said,
like, is there a future of TMMI!!!!
That absolutely has nothing to do with any Litigation!!!!
It's a vague statement put out on X!!!!
Stewguts
2 weeks ago
Great post Adamph85, I couldn't agree more. They have indeed continued to report, albeit sometimes delayed and maintained the current listing status. It's evident from their last tweet that they are currently focused on resolving the lawsuit, which is a crucial step before they can move forward effectively.
You're right about the importance of understanding the financial burden of legal proceedings. The fact that someone is willing to cover these costs shows a significant commitment to the company and its shareholders. We are fortunate Susan Bala has taken on the challenge of keeping TMM current as well as continuing to fund the lawsuit in order to stave off a default judgement leading to a potentially egregious award to DFMI. Instead of being critical, we should appreciate the efforts being made on our behalf as I am hard pressed to find anyone else that would want to step into this unweildly beast called TMM Inc.
As you mentioned, investing in an OTC company comes with inherent risks. Negative and threatening comments only serve to demoralize and hinder progress. It’s vital to maintain a positive and supportive environment for everyone involved, especially those working hard to steer the company through challenging times.
Susan Bala's track record of overcoming obstacles and achieving success speaks volumes. It's a testament to her resilience and dedication. While the current situation is frustrating, I believe that once the lawsuit is settled, the company will be in a much stronger position to move forward and deliver value to its investors.
Ultimately, we have two choices: sell our shares if we cannot endure the uncertainty or stay patient and trust in the leadership to navigate through this period or choose to have faith in Ms. Bala and look forward to the positive outcomes of her efforts.
At this point it is what it is.