rtrstock
9 months ago
1 for 30 not bad, but still will have to hold a long time to get my money back, if I ever do, averaged in at maybe 1.30, so uncertain what price will need to be after reverse split eventually to even break even. Wanting to hold long and make money eventually, but unsure if that's still possible.
I have 5100 shares, so that will be cut to practically nothing, it'd have to go to nearly 50.00 a share for me to make my money back?
Is this correct? Is basically everyone even the big investors like Lilly and Cargill losing big on this one?
81vette
10 months ago
DTIL astronomical potential=greed/hold,tutes own 27%,insiders 21%,100M cash(no offerings),eps this year up 60%/sales past 5years up 102%(tells me sales have started and that explains tutes,I expect they buy more now) 27%below the sma200(so it’s got at least that much run room) target price 2.62, 198 employees,bullish chart since Oct 30th,could be some bashers because it is optionable/shortable,institutional could send this flying up,relative buying vol up 148Xs today ,shares available to short is dropping but still 3.5M(was 4.3m) overall I like that I can put this in my portfolio for long(or until chart breaks) and not have to watch it like a nail biting pump and dump,I have too many of those already lol
jondoeuk
12 months ago
So, at 4:30pm the day before Thanksgiving, they announce a special meeting to vote on a R/S. It will take place on Thurs, Jan 18, '24, at 11:00 am, Eastern Time, at a ratio ranging from 1-for-10 and 1-for-30.
jondoeuk
1 year ago
I should have pointed out that companies are happening to develop small[er] nucleases. Here is one paper from Casebia Therapeutics, which is a joint venture between CRSP and BAYN https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24454-5
Also, in 2020, researchers led by Dr. Liu created a new base editor that could perform C-to-T conversion of DNA in mitochondria. However, it had limitations, not only being restricted to that conversion, but mostly limited a certain motif. This means that it could correct only 10% of confirmed pathogenic mitochondrial point mutations https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-022-01256-8
Last year another novel base editor was created that could achieve A-to-G conversion. Being able to perform that could correct 43% of confirmed pathogenic mitochondrial point mutations https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(22)00389-0
However, I don't see either base editor entering the clinic for a number of years.