FCEC First Chester County Corp. (MM)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the transition period from                   to                  .

Commission File No. 0-12870.

FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

9 North High Street

West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380

(Address of principal executive office)

(Zip code)

(484) 881-4000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x   No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  o   No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o   No  x

The number of shares outstanding of Common Stock of the registrant as of August 10, 2010 was 6,318,611.

Table of Contents

IND EX

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements.”  These forward-looking statements are made in good faith pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  The words “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. References to “we,” “our” and the “Corporation” refer to First Chester County Corporation, together in each case with our consolidated subsidiaries unless the context suggests otherwise.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industry in which we operate and management’s beliefs and assumptions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements, including as a result of risks discussed in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

i

Table of Contents

FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

2

Table of Contents

FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

( UNAUDITED )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

3

Table of Contents

FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

( UNAUDITED )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

4

Table of Contents

FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

( UNAUDITED )

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

5

Table of Contents

FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

1.             Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

The foregoing unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information.  The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes.  Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation, which includes reclassifications for discontinued operations (see Note 6 for discontinued operations disclosure and Note 12 for earnings (loss) per share).  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been included.  The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.  These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (our “2009 Annual Report”).

Prior to January 1, 2010, our business was conducted through two primary segments, community banking and mortgage banking.  During the first quarter 2010, we announced the potential sale of our American Home Bank (“AHB”) mortgage banking segment.  Accordingly, the mortgage banking operations related to this segment have been reclassified, and are now presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations.  Certain assets and liabilities of this former segment are presented as discontinued assets held for sale.  The statements of cash flows are presented on a consolidated basis, including both continuing and discontinued operations.  The notes to the consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to exclude discontinued operations unless otherwise noted.  Footnote segment disclosures are not provided.  Refer to Note 6 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements for information related to discontinued operations.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of First Chester County Corporation (“First Chester” or the “Corporation”)  and First National Bank of Chester County (the “Bank”).  All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

2.               Going Concern

The Corporation’s financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the discharge of liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. However, due to the Corporation’s financial results, the substantial uncertainty throughout the U.S. banking industry and other matters discussed in this report, a substantial doubt exists regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

As further described in Note 5, on October 16, 2009, the Bank entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”). The OCC also mandated higher individual minimum capital ratios (“IMCRs”), which the Bank was required to achieve by December 31, 2009. Continued operations may depend on the Corporation’s ability to comply with the terms of the MOU, the IMCRs and the closing of the pending merger with Tower Bancorp, Inc. (“Tower”). For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation incurred a net loss from operations, primarily from the higher provisions for loan losses due to increased levels of non-performing assets, the write-off of goodwill and the establishment of a valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets. Our efforts to raise capital to comply with the IMCRs prior to the deadline ultimately resulted in the planned merger with Tower, as described in Note 3 below, which was announced on December 28, 2009. In addition, in efforts to conserve capital, we elected to reduce and subsequently suspend our cash dividends on our common stock beginning with the third quarter of 2009. However, despite the above efforts, as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Bank was below certain IMCR thresholds.  The Corporation is in compliance with the IMCRs as of June 30, 2010, as further discussed in Note 5.

6

Table of Contents

FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Management and the board of directors are committed to the planned merger with Tower. However, if the announced merger were not to occur, then Management would seek to recapitalize the Bank by finding another merger partner or by raising additional capital in the public or private markets. The Corporation is completing a regular planning cycle for 2011, which includes, among other things, updating the Corporation’s strategic business plan and creating detailed operating and marketing plans for the Bank as an independent company.

3.             Pending Merger

On December 27, 2009, the Corporation entered into a definitive merger agreement, as amended on March 4, 2010 (the “Merger Agreement”), with Tower, the holding company for Graystone Tower Bank (“Graystone”), pursuant to which First Chester will merge with and into Tower (the “Merger”), with Tower being the surviving corporation. The Merger Agreement also provides that upon consummation of the merger, the Bank will merge with and into Graystone, with Graystone as the surviving institution (the “Bank Merger”). The Merger Agreement additionally provides for the potential sale of the AHB segment at or prior to the consummation of the Merger. At the effective time of the Merger, the board of directors of Tower will be increased by three (3) directors and three (3) of the current directors of First Chester selected by the board of directors of First Chester, with the approval of Tower’s board of directors, will be added to the board of directors of Tower, to serve as such for no less than three years.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, shareholders of First Chester will receive 0.453 shares of Tower common stock for each share of First Chester common stock they own. The Merger Agreement establishes loan delinquency thresholds and provides for an increase or reduction in the consideration paid by Tower to First Chester shareholders in the event of specified increases or decreases in First Chester’s loan delinquencies prior to closing.

Directors and executive officers of First Chester have entered into Voting Agreements with Tower, pursuant to which they have agreed, among other things, to vote all shares of common stock of First Chester owned by them in favor of the approval of the Merger at the special shareholder’s meeting to vote upon the Merger.

Consummation of the Merger is subject to certain terms and conditions, including, but not limited to, receipt of various regulatory approvals and approval by both Tower’s and First Chester’s shareholders and First Chester’s loan delinquencies not exceeding $90 million in the aggregate. As of June 30, 2010, all regulatory approvals have been received from the bank regulators. However, certain of these approvals contain expiration dates such that extensions may need to be obtained if the merger is not closed prior to the end of the third quarter of 2010.

4.             Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The update requires companies to provide more information in their disclosures about the credit quality of their financing receivables and the credit reserves held against them. The amendments that require disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for the periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. ASU No. 2010-20 will enhance the disclosure requirements for financing receivables and credit losses, but will not impact the Corporation’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements.  This guidance removes the requirement for a SEC filer to disclose a date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of GAAP.  ASU 2010-09 is intended to remove potential conflicts with the SEC’s literature and all of the amendments are effective upon issuance, except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors.  The Corporation adopted the guidance for the interim period ending June 30, 2010 with no impact on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.  This guidance requires: (1) disclosure of the significant amount transferred in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for the

7

Table of Contents

FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

transfers; and (2) separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).  In addition, ASU 2010-06 clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures set forth in FASB Accounting Standards Codifications (ASC) 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”: (1) For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and (2) a reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning January 1, 2011, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Corporation adopted the guidance on January 1, 2010, and the guidance did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB updated ASC 860, “Transfers and Servicing,” to eliminate the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (“QSPE”), modify the criteria for applying sale accounting to transfers of financial assets or portions of financial assets, differentiate between the initial measurement of an interest held in connection with the transfer of an entire financial asset recognized as a sale and participating interests recognized as a sale and remove the provision allowing classification of interests received in a guaranteed mortgage securitization transaction that does not qualify as a sale as available-for-sale or trading securities. The updates to ASC 860 clarify (i) that an entity must consider all arrangements or agreements made contemporaneously or in contemplation of a transfer, (ii) the isolation analysis related to the transferor and its consolidated subsidiaries and (iii) the principle of effective control over the transferred financial asset. The updates to ASC 860 also enhance financial statement disclosures. The updates to ASC 860 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 with earlier application prohibited. Revised recognition and measurement provisions are to be applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective date and the disclosure provisions are to be applied to transfers that occurred both before and after the effective date. The guidance was effective for January 1, 2010 and did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB updated ASC 810, “Consolidation,” to modify certain characteristics that identify a variable interest entity (“VIE”), revise the criteria for determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE, add an additional reconsideration event to determining whether an entity is a VIE, eliminating troubled debt restructurings as an excluded reconsideration event and enhance disclosures regarding involvement with a VIE. Additionally, with the elimination of the concept of QSPEs in the updates to ASC 860, entities previously considered QSPEs are now within the scope of ASC 810. Entities required to consolidate or deconsolidate a VIE will recognize a cumulative effect in retained earnings for any difference in the carrying amount of the interest recognized. The updates to ASC 810 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 with earlier application prohibited. The guidance was effective for January 1, 2010 and did not have an impact on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.

5.               Regulatory Matters

Supervisory Actions

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can prompt certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporation’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators involving factors such as the risk weights assigned to assets and what items may be counted as capital. Regulators also have broad discretion to require any institution to maintain higher capital levels than otherwise required by statute or regulation, even institutions that are considered “well-capitalized” under applicable regulations.

On October 16, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Bank entered into an MOU with the OCC. An MOU with regulatory authorities is an informal action that is not published or publicly available and that is used when

8

Table of Contents

FIRST CHESTER COUNTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

circumstances warrant a milder form of action than a formal supervisory action, such as a formal written agreement or order. Under the MOU, the Bank has agreed to address, among other things, the following matters:

·                   Develop a comprehensive three-year capital plan;

·                   Take action to protect criticized assets and adopt and implement a program to eliminate the basis of criticism of such assets;

·                   Establish an effective program that provides for early problem loan identification and a formal plan to proactively manage those assets;

·                   Review the adequacy of the Bank’s information technology activities and Bank Secrecy Act compliance and approve written programs of policies and procedures to provide for compliance; and

·                   Establish a Compliance Committee of the Board to monitor and coordinate the Bank’s adherence to the provisions of the MOU.

The Board of Directors and Management have initiated corrective actions to comply with the provisions of the MOU.

Additionally, in November 2009, the Bank was advised that the OCC established IMCRs for the Bank higher than the capital ratios generally applicable to banks under current regulations. In the case of the Bank, the OCC established IMCRs requiring a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least eight percent (8%), a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least ten percent (10%) and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least twelve percent (12%) which the Bank was required to achieve by December 31, 2009. The Corporation’s efforts to raise capital prior to the deadline ultimately resulted in the planned merger with Tower Bancorp, which was announced on December 28, 2009.  During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation also received notice from the Federal Reserve, its primary regulator, that the Federal Reserve must approve any dividends to be paid in advance of the declaration or payment of the dividend.

For the purpose of satisfying the IMCRs, during December 2009, the Corporation entered into an amendment to our existing loan agreement with Graystone to recapitalize the Bank. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation borrowed the full $26.0 million available under the credit facility which was contributed to the Bank as Tier 1 capital. Additionally, Graystone purchased $52.5 million in first lien residential real estate and commercial loan participations at a 1.5% discount.

As set forth in the tables below, as of June 30, 2010, the Bank met the IMCR thresholds for all capital ratios, but as of December 31, 2009, the Bank was below the IMCR thresholds for Tier 1 leverage and total risk-based capital.