CFTC Backs $50Mln Minimum For Clearinghouse Membership

U.S. derivatives regulators on Tuesday backed a lower entry fee for financial institutions to gain entry into the business of processing privately negotiated derivatives, or swaps--a sector dominated by the biggest Wall Street banks.

The move is designed to loosen the grip that these dealer banks have had on the business of swaps clearing, which is seen to be a lucrative new niche in light of a pending regulatory overhaul.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission reiterated its proposal for a $50 million minimum net capital requirement for firms to become members of clearinghouses set up to guarantee obligations on credit, interest-rate and other swaps. The agency is expected to finalize the rule at a hearing Tuesday in Washington.

Regulators in Europe and Asia are working to craft their own rules aimed at tightening industry practices for the $601 trillion global swaps market, which was blamed for deepening the most recent financial crisis.

Clearing, which involves posting collateral to a central repository in order to reduce the fallout if a member of the clearinghouse fails, will be mandated for standardized, actively traded swaps under the new rules. Annual revenues on swap clearing post-reform are estimated to be worth several billion dollars, according to research by Booz & Co.

The $50 million barrier to entry was first proposed by the CFTC last December and has been the focus of intense debate among banks and brokers angling for a share of the clearing business. That is partly because it comes in far lower than previously set standards at clearinghouses run by IntercontinentalExchange Inc. (ICE) and CME Group Inc. (CME), which had ranged as high as $5 billion.

In July, ICE lowered its minimum net capital threshold for members of its credit default swaps clearinghouse to $100 million from $5 billion in tangible net equity. Shortly afterwards, ICE chief executive Jeffrey Sprecher told analysts he knew the net threshold was still above the CFTC proposed level, but that it was a "good landing point" to start with. Others also believed the CFTC's $50 million proposal was a placeholder, and subject to change.

ICE's new test will apply to clearing agents for customer swaps, now referred to as futures commission merchants (FCMs) after their parallel role in the exchange-traded derivatives business. The $5 billion test will still apply for some broker dealers and agents that were members before ICE changed its membership requirements, however.

But would-be new entrants to swaps clearing say the lower barrier to entry will still keep them out, and that this in not in the spirit of open-access rules in the U.S. Dodd-Frank financial overhaul law of 2010, which sought to have a big chunk of the swaps market cleared.

At the same time as cutting the capital requirement, ICE introduced a new rule asking members to keep excess net capital totaling at least 5% in customer funds--regardless of whether that capital was supporting swaps intended for clearing, or futures and options.

For at least two firms looking to get into swaps clearing--MF Global Holdings Ltd. (MF) and Newedge USA LLC--that 5% margin requirement would mean not just the entry fee to the clearinghouse, but hundreds of millions in extra capital set aside. The net result, these firms say, is that the big dealers that have hitherto controlled the business could continue to do so.

Moreover, the would-be new entrants say the 5% test will penalize them for being more conservative on the margin they demand from customers during choppy market conditions. The more customer funds they have to cushion them in volatile times, the more money the 5% excess capital test will force them to set aside.

On top of the dollar capital requirements, ICE says clearing members have to have sufficient operational capabilities to price and manage a book of credit default swaps so that they can be relied upon in case another clearing member defaults and they have to take over the defaulting member's positions.

Banks say the business of managing risk is complicated and players looking to become members need to be sophisticated enough to manage defaults if a clearinghouse should fail.

The CFTC is proposing that clearinghouses create different levels of responsibility for different sized firms in the event of default, according to a CFTC staff briefing of the rule for reporters.

-By Katy Burne and Jacob Bunge, Dow Jones Newswires; 212-416-3084; katy.burne@dowjones.com

--Jamila Trindle in Washington contributed to this article.

CME (NASDAQ:CME)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024