Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:
Indicate by check mark if the registrant
is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
Indicate by check mark if the registrant
is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
1 General Information
GeoPark Limited (the “Company”)
is a company incorporated under the law of Bermuda. The Registered Office address is Cumberland House, 9th Floor, 1 Victoria Street,
Hamilton HM11, Bermuda.
The principal activities of the Company
and its subsidiaries (the “Group” or “GeoPark”) are exploration, development and production for oil and
gas reserves in Colombia, Chile, Brazil, Argentina and Peru.
These Consolidated Financial Statements
were authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on 6 March 2019.
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
The principal accounting policies applied
in the preparation of these Consolidated Financial Statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied
to the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
2.1 Basis of preparation
The Consolidated Financial Statements of
GeoPark Limited have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued
by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”), under the historical cost convention.
The Consolidated Financial Statements are
presented in thousands of United States Dollars (US$'000) and all values are rounded to the nearest thousand (US$'000), except
in the footnotes and where otherwise indicated.
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its
judgement in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or
complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the Consolidated Financial Statements are disclosed in
this note under the title “Accounting estimates and assumptions”.
All the information included in these Consolidated
Financial Statements corresponds to the Group, except where otherwise indicated.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(continued)
2.1 Basis of preparation (continued)
2.1.1 Changes in accounting policy and
disclosure
New and amended standards adopted by
the Group
The following standards have been adopted
by the Group for the first time for the financial year beginning on or after 1 January 2018:
|
·
|
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
|
|
·
|
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
|
|
·
|
Classification and Measurement of Share-based
Payment Transactions – Amendments to IFRS 2
|
|
·
|
Annual Improvements 2014-2016 cycle
|
|
·
|
Interpretation 22 Foreign Currency Transactions
and Advance Consideration
|
The Group also elected to adopt the following
amendments early:
|
·
|
Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2015-2017
Cycle.
|
IFRS 9 replaces the provisions of IAS 39
related to the recognition, classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities, derecognition of financial
instruments, impairment of financial assets and hedge accounting.
The adoption of IFRS 9 from 1 January 2018
resulted in changes in accounting policies (see Note 2.16 and Note 2.18) and a reclassification of a measurement category (see
below), but no adjustments to the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
On 1 January 2018, the Group classified
money market funds for US$ 44,123,000 accounted within Cash and cash equivalents as of 31 December 2017, as Financial assets at
fair value through profit or loss that were previously classified as Loans and receivables. No results were generated as a consequence
of this change. As of 31 December 2018, the Group holds money market funds for US$ 53,794,000.
IFRS 15 replaces IAS 18 which covered contracts
for goods and services and IAS 11 which covered construction contracts. The new standard is based on the principle that revenue
is recognized when control of a good or service transfers to a customer, so the notion of control replaces the existing notion
of risks and rewards.
The adoption of IFRS 15 from 1 January 2018
resulted in no changes in accounting policies or adjustments to the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The adoption of the other amendments listed
above did not have any impact on the amounts recognized in prior periods and are not expected to significantly affect the current
or future periods.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(continued)
2.1 Basis of preparation (continued)
2.1.1 Changes in accounting policy and
disclosure (continued)
New standards, amendments and interpretations
issued but not effective for the financial year beginning 1 January 2018 and not early adopted.
·
IFRS
16 Leases: will affect primarily the accounting by lessees and will result in the recognition of almost all leases on the balance
sheet. The standard removes the current distinction between operating and financing leases and requires recognition of an asset
(the right to use the leased item) and a financial liability to pay rentals for virtually all lease contracts. An optional exemption
exists for short-term and low-value leases. The accounting by lessors will not significantly change. Some differences may arise
as a result of the new guidance on the definition of a lease.
The Group has set up a project team by business
unit which has reviewed each business unit’s leasing arrangements over the last year in light of the new lease accounting
rules in IFRS 16. The standard will affect primarily the accounting for the Group’s operating leases.
As at the reporting date, the Group has
non-cancellable operating lease commitments of US$ 69,938,000, see Note 32.3. Of these commitments, the Group expects to recognize
right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, at nominal value, of approximately US$ 14,449,000 on 1 January 2019. The remaining lease
commitments, in accordance with IFRS 16, will be recognized on a straight-line basis as expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
There will not be an impact on Adjusted
EBITDA as a consequence of the adoption of this new standard. This measure is used to assess the performance of the operating segments
and is also considered for the calculation of the incurrence test covenants included in the indenture governing the Group’s
main financial debt. Therefore, Management decided to modify the definition of this measure since the adoption of IFRS 16 in 2019
in order to ensure comparability with previous periods.
Operating cash flows will increase and financing
cash flows decrease by approximately US$ 4,000,000 as repayment of the principal portion of the lease liabilities will be classified
as cash flows from financing activities.
The Group will apply the standard from its
mandatory adoption date of 1 January 2019. The Group intends to apply the simplified transition approach and will not restate comparative
amounts for the year prior to first adoption. Lease liability for property leases will be measured on transition at the present
value of the remaining lease payments, discounted using the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate at the date of initial application.
The right-of-use asset on transition (on a lease-by-lease basis) will be measure at an amount equal to the lease liability (adjusted
for any prepaid or accrued lease expenses).
There are no other standards that are not
yet effective and that would be expected to have a material impact on the entity in the current or future reporting periods and
on foreseeable future transactions.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(continued)
2.2 Going concern
The Directors regularly monitor the Group's
cash position and liquidity risks throughout the year to ensure that it has sufficient funds to meet forecast operational and investment
funding requirements. Sensitivities are run to reflect latest expectations of expenditures, oil and gas prices and other factors
to enable the Group to manage the risk of any funding short falls and/or potential debt covenant breaches.
Considering macroeconomic environment conditions,
the performance of the operations, the US$ 425,000,000 debt fundraising completed in September 2017, the Group’s cash position,
and the fact that over 95% of its total indebtedness matures in 2024, the Directors have formed a judgement, at the time of approving
the financial statements, that there is a reasonable expectation that the Group has adequate resources to meet all its obligations
for the foreseeable future. For this reason, the Directors have continued to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
2.3 Consolidation
Subsidiaries are all entities (including
structured entities) over which the Group has control. The Group controls an entity when the Group is exposed to, or has rights
to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the
entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are deconsolidated
from the date that control ceases.
The Group applies the acquisition method
to account for business combinations. The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary is the fair value of the assets
transferred, the liabilities incurred by the former owners of the acquiree and the equity interests issued by the Group. The consideration
transferred includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement. Identifiable
assets acquired, and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their
fair values at the acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred.
The excess of the consideration transferred
over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the total of consideration transferred
is less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired in the case of a bargain purchase, the difference is recognized
directly in the income statement.
Intercompany transactions, balances and
unrealized gains on transactions between the Group and its subsidiaries are eliminated. Unrealized losses are also eliminated unless
the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Amounts reported in the financial statements of subsidiaries
have been adjusted where necessary to ensure consistency with the accounting policies adopted by the Group.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(continued)
2.4 Segment reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner
consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who
is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the Executive
Committee. This committee is integrated by the CEO, COO, CFO and managers in charge of the Geoscience, Operations, Corporate Governance,
Finance and People departments. This committee reviews the Group’s internal reporting in order to assess performance and
allocate resources. Management has determined the operating segments based on these reports.
2.5 Foreign currency translation
2.5.1 Functional and presentation currency
The Consolidated Financial Statements are
presented in US Dollars, which is the Group’s presentation currency.
Items included in the financial statements
of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates
(the “functional currency”). The functional currency of Group companies incorporated in Chile, Colombia, Peru and Argentina
is the US Dollar, meanwhile for the Group´s Brazilian company the functional currency is the local currency, which is the
Brazilian Real.
2.5.2 Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated
into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses
resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at period-end exchange rates of monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
2.6 Joint arrangements
Under IFRS 11 investments in joint arrangements
are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures depending on the contractual rights and obligations of each investor.
The Group has assessed the nature of its
joint arrangements and determined them to be joint operations. The Group combines its share in the joint operations individual
assets, liabilities, results and cash flows on a line-by-line basis with similar items in its financial statements.
2.7 Revenue recognition
Revenue from the sale of crude oil and gas
is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income when control is transferred to the purchaser, and if the revenue can be measured
reliably and is expected to be received. Revenue is shown net of VAT, discounts related to the sale and overriding royalties due
to the ex-owners of oil and gas properties where the royalty arrangements represent a retained working interest in the property.
See Note 32.1.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(continued)
2.8 Production and operating costs
Production and operating costs are recognized
in the Consolidated Statement of Income on the accrual basis of accounting. These costs include wages and salaries incurred to
achieve the revenue for the year. Direct and indirect costs of raw materials and consumables, rentals, leasing and royalties are
also included within this account.
2.9 Financial results
Financial results include interest expenses,
interest income, bank charges, the amortization of financial assets and liabilities, and foreign exchange gains and losses. The
Group has capitalized the borrowing cost for wells and facilities that were initiated after 1 January 2009. The capitalization
rate used to determine the amount of borrowing costs to be capitalized is the weighted average interest rate applicable to the
Group’s general borrowings during the year, which was 6.90% at year-end 2018 (6.90% at year-end 2017 and 7.98% in 2016).
Amounts capitalized during the year
amounted to
US$ 257,507 (US$ 610,841 in 2017 and
US$ 254,950 in 2016).
2.10 Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated
at historical cost less depreciation and impairment charges, if applicable. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly
attributable to the acquisition of the items; including provisions for asset retirement obligation.
Oil and gas exploration and production activities
are accounted for in accordance with the successful efforts method on a field by field basis. The Group accounts for exploration
and evaluation activities in accordance with IFRS 6, Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources, capitalizing exploration
and evaluation costs until such time as the economic viability of producing the underlying resources is determined. Costs incurred
prior to obtaining legal rights to explore are expensed immediately to the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Exploration and evaluation costs may include:
license acquisition, geological and geophysical studies (i.e.: seismic), direct labour costs and drilling costs of exploratory
wells. No depreciation and/or amortization are charged during the exploration and evaluation phase. Upon completion of the evaluation
phase, the prospects are either transferred to oil and gas properties or charged to expense (exploration costs) in the period in
which the determination is made, depending whether they have discovered reserves or not. If not developed, exploration and evaluation
assets are written off after three years, unless it can be clearly demonstrated that the carrying value of the investment is recoverable.
A charge of US$ 26,389,000 has been
recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income within Write-off of unsuccessful exploration efforts (US$ 5,834,000 in 2017
and US$ 31,366,000 in 2016). See Note 20.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(continued)
2.10 Property, plant and equipment (continued)
All field development costs are considered
construction in progress until they are finished and capitalized within oil and gas properties, and are subject to depreciation
once completed. Such costs may include the acquisition and installation of production facilities, development drilling costs (including
dry holes, service wells and seismic surveys for development purposes), project-related engineering and the acquisition costs of
rights and concessions related to proved properties.
Workovers of wells made to develop reserves
and/or increase production are capitalized as development costs. Maintenance costs are charged to the Consolidated Statement of
Income when incurred.
Capitalized costs of proved oil and gas
properties and production facilities and machinery are depreciated on a licensed area by the licensed area basis, using the unit
of production method, based on commercial proved and probable reserves. The calculation of the “unit of production”
depreciation takes into account estimated future finding and development costs and is based on current year-end unescalated price
levels. Changes in reserves and cost estimates are recognized prospectively. Reserves are converted to equivalent units on the
basis of approximate relative energy content.
Depreciation of the remaining property,
plant and equipment assets (i.e. furniture and vehicles) not directly associated with oil and gas activities has been calculated
by means of the straight-line method by applying such annual rates as required to write-off their value at the end of their estimated
useful lives. The useful lives range between 3 years and 10 years.
Depreciation is allocated in the Consolidated
Statement of Income as a separate line to better follow the performance of the business.
An asset’s carrying amount is written
down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount
(see Impairment of non-financial assets in Note 2.12).
2.11 Provisions and other long-term liabilities
Provisions for asset retirement obligations,
deferred income, restructuring obligations and legal claims are recognized when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation
as a result of past events; it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and the amount
has been reliably estimated. Restructuring provisions comprise lease termination penalties and employee termination payments.
Provisions are measured at the present value
of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments
of the time value of money and the risks specific to the obligation. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is
recognized as financial expense.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(continued)
2.11 Provisions and other long-term liabilities
(continued)
2.11.1 Asset Retirement Obligation
The Group records the fair value of the
liability for asset retirement obligations in the period in which the wells are drilled. When the liability is initially recorded,
the Group capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted
to its present value at each reporting period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related
asset. According to interpretations and the application of current legislation, and on the basis of the changes in technology and
the variations in the costs of restoration necessary to protect the environment, the Group has considered it appropriate to periodically
re-evaluate future costs of well-capping. The effects of this recalculation are included in the financial statements in the period
in which this recalculation is determined and reflected as an adjustment to the provision and the corresponding property, plant
and equipment asset.
2.11.2 Deferred Income
Relates to contributions received in cash
from the Group’s clients to improve the project economics of gas wells. The amounts collected are reflected as a deferred
income in the balance sheet and recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income over the productive life of the associated wells.
The depreciation of the gas wells that generated the deferred income is charged to the Consolidated Statement of Income simultaneously
with the amortization of the deferred income. The amounts used in 2017 correspond to the deferred income related to the take-or-pay
provision associated to gas sales in Brazil.
2.12 Impairment of non-financial assets
Assets that are not subject to depreciation
and/or amortization (i.e.: exploration and evaluation assets) are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to depreciation
and/or amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may
not be recoverable.
An impairment loss is recognized for the
excess of the asset’s carrying amount over its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s
fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels
for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units), generally a licensed area. Non-financial assets
other than goodwill that suffered impairment are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date.
No asset should be kept as an exploration
and evaluation asset for a period of more than three years, except if it can be clearly demonstrated that the carrying value of
the investment will be recoverable.
During 2018, impairment loss was reversed
for US$ 4,982,000 (no impairment loss recognized or reversed in 2017 and impairment loss reversed for US$ 5,664,000 in 2016). See
Note 36. The write-offs are detailed in Note 20.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(continued)
2.13 Lease contracts
All current lease contracts are considered
to be operating leases on the basis that the lessor retains substantially all the risks and rewards related to the ownership of
the leased asset. Payments related to operating leases and other rental agreements are recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement
on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. The Group's total commitment relating to operating leases and rental agreements
is disclosed in Note 32.3.
Leases in which substantially all of the
risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the lessee are classified as finance leases. Under a finance lease, the Group
as lessor has to recognize an amount receivable equal to the aggregate of the minimum lease payments plus any unguaranteed residual
value accruing to the lessor, discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease.
2.14 Inventories
Inventories comprise crude oil and materials.
Crude oil is measured at the lower of cost
and net realizable value. Materials are measured at the lower of cost and recoverable amount. The cost of materials and consumables
is calculated at acquisition price with the addition of transportation and similar costs. Cost is determined using the first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method.
2.15 Current and deferred income tax
The tax expense for the year comprises current
and deferred tax. Tax is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
The current income tax charge is calculated
on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantially enacted at the balance sheet date in the countries where the Company’s
subsidiaries operate and generate taxable income. The computation of the income tax expense involves the interpretation of applicable
tax laws and regulations in many jurisdictions. The resolution of tax positions taken by the Group, through negotiations with relevant
tax authorities or through litigation, can take several years to complete and, in some cases, it is difficult to predict the ultimate
outcome.
Deferred income tax is recognized, using
the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts
in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or
substantially enacted as of the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realized,
or the deferred income tax liability is settled.
In addition, the Group has tax-loss carry-forwards
in certain tax jurisdictions that are available to be offset against future taxable profit. However, deferred tax assets are recognized
only to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the unused tax losses can be utilized.
Management judgment is exercised in assessing whether this is the case. To the extent that actual outcomes differ from management’s
estimates, taxation charges or credits may arise in future periods.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(continued)
2.15 Current and deferred income tax
(continued)
Deferred income tax liabilities are provided
on taxable temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries and joint arrangements, except for deferred income tax
liability where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Group and it is probable that the temporary
difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. The Group is able to control the timing of dividends from its subsidiaries
and hence does not expect taxable profit. Hence deferred tax is recognized in respect of the retained earnings of overseas subsidiaries
only if at the date of the statements of financial position, dividends have been accrued as receivable or a binding agreement to
distribute past earnings in future has been entered into by the subsidiary. As mentioned above the Group does not expect that the
temporary differences will revert in the foreseeable future. In the event that these differences revert in total (e.g. dividends
are declared and paid), the deferred tax liability which the Group would have to recognize amounts to approximately US$ 11,400,000.
Deferred tax balances are provided in full,
with no discounting.
2.16 Non-current assets or disposal groups
held for sale
Non-current assets or disposal groups are
classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through
continuing use and a sale is considered highly probable. They are measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value
less costs to sell, except for assets such as deferred tax assets, assets arising from employee benefits, financial assets and
investment property that are carried at fair value and contractual rights under insurance contracts, which are specifically exempt
from this requirement.
An impairment loss is recognized for any
initial or subsequent write-down of the asset or disposal group to fair value less costs to sell. A gain is recognized for any
subsequent increases in fair value less costs to sell of an asset or disposal group, but not in excess of any cumulative impairment
loss previously recognized. A gain or loss not previously recognized by the date of the sale of the non-current asset or disposal
group is recognized at the date of derecognition.
Non-current assets (including those that
are part of a disposal group) are not depreciated or amortized while they are classified as held for sale. Interest and other expenses
attributable to the liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale continue to be recognized.
Non-current assets classified as held for
sale and the assets of a disposal group classified as held for sale are presented separately from the other assets in the Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position. The liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale are presented separately from
other liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(continued)
2.17 Financial assets
Financial assets are divided into the following
categories: amortized cost; financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and fair value through other comprehensive income.
The classification depends on the Group’s business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual terms of the
cash flows. The Group reclassifies debt investments when and only when its business model for managing those assets changes.
All financial assets not at fair value through
profit or loss are initially recognized at fair value, plus transaction costs. Transaction costs of financial assets carried at
fair value through profit or loss, if any, are expensed to profit or loss.
Derecognition of financial assets occurs
when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments expire or are transferred and substantially all of the risks and rewards
of ownership have been transferred. An assessment for impairment is undertaken at each balance sheet date.
Interest and other cash flows resulting
from holding financial assets are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income when receivable, regardless of how the related
carrying amount of financial assets is measured.
Amortized cost are non-derivative financial
assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except
for maturities greater than twelve months after the balance sheet date. These are classified as non-current assets. These financial
assets comprise trade receivables, prepayments and other receivables and cash and cash equivalents in the Consolidated Statement
of Financial Position. They arise when the Group provides money, goods or services directly to a debtor with no intention of trading
the receivables. These financial assets are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less provision
for impairment, if applicable.
Any change in their value through impairment
or reversal of impairment is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income. All of the Group’s financial assets are
classified as amortized cost.
2.18 Other financial assets
Non-current other financial assets include
contributions made for environmental obligations according to a Colombian and Brazilian government request and are restricted for
those purposes.
Current other financial assets include short-term
investments with original maturities up to twelve months and over three months. As of 31 December 2017, they also included the
security deposit granted in relation to the purchase of Argentinian assets (see Note 35.3).
2.19 Impairment of financial assets
The Group assesses on a forward-looking
basis the expected credit losses associated with its debt instruments. The impairment methodology applied depends on whether there
has been a significant increase in credit risk. For trade receivables, the Group applies the simplified approach permitted by IFRS
9, which requires expected lifetime losses to be recognized from initial recognition of the receivables.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(continued)
2.20 Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash
in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months
or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts, if any, are shown within borrowings in the current liabilities section of the Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position.
2.21 Trade and other payables
Trade payables are obligations to pay for
goods or services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of the business from suppliers. Accounts payable are classified
as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less (or in the normal operating cycle of the business if longer).
If not, they are presented as non-current liabilities.
Trade payables are recognized initially at
fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
2.22 Derivatives
Derivative financial instruments are recognized
in the statement of financial position as assets or liabilities and initially and subsequently measured at fair value through profit
and loss. They are presented as current assets or liabilities if they are expected to be settled within 12 months after the end
of the reporting period.
The mark-to-market fair value of the Group's
outstanding derivative instruments is based on independently provided market rates and determined using standard valuation techniques,
including the impact of counterparty credit risk and are within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Gains and losses arising from
changes in fair value are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income within Commodity risk management contracts.
For more information about derivatives please
refer to Note 8.
2.23 Borrowings
Borrowings are obligations to pay cash and
are recognized when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Borrowings are recognized initially at fair
value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently stated at amortized cost; any difference between the proceeds
(net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income over the period of the
borrowings using the effective interest method.
Direct issue costs are charged to the Consolidated
Statement of Income on an accrual basis using the effective interest method.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
2 Summary of significant accounting policies
(continued)
2.24 Share capital
Equity comprises the following:
|
·
|
"Share capital" representing
the nominal value of equity shares.
|
|
·
|
"Share premium" representing
the excess over nominal value of the fair value of consideration received for equity shares, net of expenses of the share issuance.
|
|
·
|
"Other reserve" representing:
|
|
-
|
the equity element attributable to shares granted according to IFRS 2 but not issued at year end
or,
|
|
-
|
the difference between the proceeds from the transaction with non-controlling interests received
against the book value of the shares acquired in the Chilean and Colombian subsidiaries.
|
|
·
|
"Translation reserve" representing
the differences arising from translation of investments in overseas subsidiaries.
|
|
·
|
"(Accumulated losses) Retained earnings"
representing accumulated earnings and losses.
|
2.25 Share-based payment
The Group operates a number of equity-settled
share-based compensation plans comprising share awards payments to certain employees and other third-party contractors. Share-based
payment transactions are measured in accordance with IFRS 2.
Fair value of the stock option plan for
employee or contractors services received in exchange for the grant of the options is recognized as an expense. The total amount
to be expensed over the vesting period is determined by reference to the fair value of the options granted calculated using the
Geometric Brownian Motion method.
Non-market vesting conditions are included
in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to vest. At each balance sheet date, the entity revises its estimates
of the number of options that are expected to vest. It recognizes the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in
the Consolidated Statement of Income, with a corresponding adjustment to equity.
The fair value of the share awards payments
is determined at the grant date by reference of the market value of the shares and recognized as an expense over the vesting period.
When the awards are exercised, the Company issues new shares. The proceeds received net of any directly attributable transaction
costs are credited to share capital (nominal value) and share premium when the options are exercised.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
3 Financial Instruments-risk management
The Group is exposed through its operations
to the following financial risks:
|
·
|
Credit risk – concentration
|
|
·
|
Funding and liquidity risk
|
|
·
|
Capital risk management
|
The policy for managing these risks is set
by the Board of Directors. Certain risks are managed centrally, while others are managed locally following guidelines communicated
from the corporate department. The policy for each of the above risks is described in more detail below.
Currency risk
In Colombia, Chile, Argentina and Peru the
functional currency is the US Dollar. The fluctuation of the local currencies of these countries against the US Dollar does not
impact the loans, costs and revenue held in US Dollars; but it does impact the balances denominated in local currencies. Such is
the case of the prepaid taxes.
In Colombian, Chilean, Argentinean and Peruvian
subsidiaries most of the balances are denominated in US Dollars, and since it is the functional currency of the subsidiaries, there
is no exposure to currency fluctuation except from receivables or payables originated in local currency mainly corresponding to
VAT and income tax.
The Group minimises the local currency positions
in Colombia, Chile, Argentina and Peru by seeking to balance local and foreign currency assets and liabilities. However, tax receivables
(VAT) seldom match with local currency liabilities. Therefore, the Group maintains a net exposure to them, except for what it is
described below.
In December 2018, GeoPark decided to manage
its future exposure to local currency fluctuation with respect to income tax balances in Colombia. Consequently, the Group entered
into a derivative financial instrument with a local bank in Colombia, for an amount equivalent to US$ 92,050,000, in order to anticipate
any currency fluctuation with respect to income taxes to be paid during the first half of 2019. The Group’s derivatives are
accounted for as non-hedge derivatives as of 31 December 2018 and therefore all changes in the fair values of its derivative contracts
are recognized as gains or losses in the results of the periods in which they occur. Considering that the instrument was subscribed
by year-end, as of 31 December 2018 the impact was not material.
Most of the Group's assets held in those
countries are associated with oil and gas productive assets. Those assets, even in the local markets, are generally settled in
US Dollar equivalents.
During 2018, the Colombian Peso devalued
by 9% (revalued by 1% in 2017 and 5% in 2016) against the US Dollar, the Chilean Peso devalued by 13% (revalued by 8% in 2017 and
devalued by 6% in 2016), the Argentine Peso devalued by 102% (17% and 22% in 2017 and 2016) and the Peruvian Peso devalued by 4%
(revalued by 4% in 2017 and 2% in 2016).
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
3 Financial Instruments-risk management
(continued)
Currency risk (continued)
If the Colombian Peso, the Chilean Peso,
the Argentine Peso and the Peruvian Peso had each devalued an additional 10% against the US dollar, with all other variables held
constant, post-tax profit for the year would have been lower by US$ 57,000 (post-tax loss higher by US$ 1,538,000 in
2017 and US$ 2,683,400 in 2016).
In Brazil, the functional currency is the
local currency, which is the Brazilian Real. The fluctuation of the US Dollars against the Brazilian Real does not impact the loans,
costs and revenues held in Brazilian Real; but it does impact the balances denominated in US Dollars. Such is the case of the provision
for asset retirement obligation and the intercompany loan, which was fully cancelled in October 2018, reducing significantly the
exposure to foreign currency fluctuation. The exchange loss generated by the Brazilian subsidiary during 2018 amounted to US$ 5,862,000
(loss of US$ 1,274,000 in 2017 and gain of US$ 14,542,000 in 2016).
During 2018, the Brazilian Real devalued
by 17% against the US Dollar (devalued by 2% in 2017 and revalued by 17% in 2016, respectively). If the Brazilian Real had devalued
10% against the US dollar, with all other variables held constant, post-tax profit for the year would have been lower by US$ 515,000
(post-tax loss higher by US$ 3,100,000 in 2017 and US$ 5,300,000 in 2016).
As currency rate changes between the US
Dollar and the local currencies, the Group recognizes gains and losses in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Price risk
The realized oil price for the Group is
linked to US dollar denominated crude oil international benchmarks. The market price of this commodity is subject to significant
volatility and has historically fluctuated widely in response to relatively minor changes in the global supply and demand for oil,
the geopolitical landscape, the economic conditions and a variety of additional factors. The main factors affecting realized prices
for gas sales vary across countries with some closely linked to international references while others are more domestically driven.
In Colombia, the realized oil price is linked
to the Vasconia crude reference price, a marker broadly used in the Llanos basin, adjusted for certain marketing and quality discounts
based on, among other things, API, viscosity, sulphur content, water content, delivery point and transport costs.
In Chile, the oil price is based on Dated
Brent minus certain marketing and quality discounts such as, API, sulphur content and others.
GeoPark has signed a long-term Gas Supply
Contract with Methanex in Chile. The price of the gas sold under this contract is determined by a formula that considers a basket
of international methanol prices, including US Gulf methanol spot barge prices, methanol spot Rotterdam prices and spot prices
in Asia.
In Brazil, prices for gas produced in the
Manati Field are based on a long-term off-take contract with Petrobras. The price of gas sold under this contract is denominated
in Brazilian Real and is adjusted annually for inflation pursuant to the Brazilian General Market Price Index (Indice Geral de
Preços do Mercado), or IGPM.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
3 Financial Instruments-risk management
(continued)
Price risk (continued)
In Argentina, the realized oil prices for
our production in the Neuquen Basin follows the “Medanito” blend oil price reference, which has traditionally been
linked to ICE Brent adjusted by certain marketing and quality discounts based on API, delivery point and transport costs. Between
May and November 2018, Medanito crude prices were capped industry-wide between US$ 65 per barrel and US$ 70 per barrel. Since December
2018, domestic prices have reconnected to the international benchmark.
Gas sales in Argentina are carried out through
annual contracts that go from May to April. The price of the gas sold under these contracts depends mainly on domestic supply and
demand and regulation affecting the sector.
If oil and methanol prices had fallen by
10% compared to actual prices during the year, with all other variables held constant, considering the impact of the derivative
contracts in place, post-tax profit for the year would have been lower by US$ 13,709,000 (post-tax loss higher by US$ 10,423,000
in 2017 and US$ 23,655,000 in 2016).
Since October 2016, GeoPark decided to manage
part of the exposure to crude oil price volatility using derivatives. The Group considers these derivative contracts to be an effective
manner of properly managing commodity price risk. The price risk management activities mainly employ combinations of options and
key parameters are based on forecasted production and budget price levels. GeoPark has also obtained credit lines from industry
leading counterparties to minimize the potential cash exposure of the derivative contracts (see Note 8).
Credit risk – concentration
The Group’s credit risk relates mainly
to accounts receivable where the credit risks correspond to the recognized values of commodities sold. GeoPark considers that there
is no significant risk associated to the Group’s major customers and hedging counterparties.
In Colombia, during 2018, the Colombian
subsidiary made 99% of the oil sales to Trafigura (one of the world’s leading independent commodity trading and logistics
houses), with Trafigura accounting for 82% of the consolidated revenue for the same period. With the expiration of our long-term
contract with Trafigura in December 2018, GeoPark begun diversifying its client base in Colombia, allocating sales on a competitive
basis to industry leading participants including traders and other producers. The contracts extend through 2019 with no longer
term delivery commitments in place. Delivery points include wellhead and other locations on the Colombian pipeline system. GeoPark
manages its counterparty credit risk associated to sales contracts by including early payment conditions to minimize the exposure.
All the oil produced in Chile as well as
the gas produced by TdF blocks (3% of the consolidated revenue, 5% in 2017 and 10% in 2016) is sold to ENAP, the State-owned oil
and gas company. In Chile, most of gas production is sold to the local subsidiary of Methanex, a Canadian public company (3% of
the consolidated revenue, 5% in 2017 and 9% in 2016).
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
3 Financial Instruments-risk management
(continued)
Credit risk – concentration (continued)
In Brazil, all the hydrocarbons from Manati
Field are sold to Petrobras, the State-owned company, which is the operator of the Manati Field (5% of the consolidated revenue,
10% in 2017 and 15% in 2016).
In Argentina, all the gas produced is sold
to Grupo Albanesi, a leading Argentine privately-held conglomerate focused on the energy market that offers natural gas, power
supply and transport services to its customers. GeoPark has an annual agreement in effect from May 2018 through April 2019. Gas
sales in Argentina account for 1% of the consolidated revenues.
The oil sales in Argentina are diversified
across clients and delivery points: i) 30% of the oil produced in Argentina (2% of the consolidated revenue) is sold locally in
Neuquen, delivered at well-head; and ii) 70% of the oil produced in Argentina (3% of the consolidated revenue) is sold to major
Argentinean refineries, delivered via pipeline. GeoPark manages the counterparty credit risk associated to sales contracts by limiting
payment terms offered to minimize the exposure.
The forementioned companies all have a good
credit standing and despite the concentration of the credit risk, the Directors do not consider there to be a significant collection
risk.
Since October 2016, the Group has executed
oil prices hedges via over-the-counter derivatives. Should oil prices drop, the Group could stand to collect from its counterparties
under the derivative contracts. The Group’s hedging counterparties are leading financial institutions and trading companies,
therefore the Directors do not consider there to be a significant collection risk.
See disclosure in Notes 8 and 25.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
3 Financial Instruments-risk management
(continued)
Funding and Liquidity risk
In the past, the Group was able to raise
capital through different sources of funding including equity, strategic partnerships and financial debt. During 2017, the Group
placed US$ 425,000,000 Notes (see Note 27).
The Group is positioned at the end of 2018
with a cash balance of US$ 127,727,000 and over 95% of its total indebtedness matures in 2024. In addition, the Group has a large
portfolio of attractive and largely discretional projects - both oil and gas - in multiple countries with over 39,000 boepd in
production at year end. This scale and positioning permit the Group to protect its financial condition and selectively allocate
capital to the optimal projects subject to prevailing macroeconomic conditions.
The Indenture governing the Company Notes
2024 includes incurrence test covenants related to compliance with certain thresholds of Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio and
Adjusted EBITDA to Interest ratio. Failure to comply with the incurrence test covenants does not trigger an event of default. However,
this situation may limit the Group’s capacity to incur additional indebtedness, as specified in the indenture governing the
Notes. As of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements, the Group is in compliance with all the indenture’s provisions
and covenants.
The most significant funding transactions
executed during 2018 and 2017 include:
In October 2018, the Brazilian subsidiary
executed a loan agreement with Banco Santander for Brazilian Real 77,640,000 (equivalent to US$ 20,000,000 at the moment of the
loan execution) to repay an existing US$-denominated intercompany loan to GeoPark Latin America Limited - Agencia en Chile. The
interest rate applicable to this loan is CDI plus 2.25% per annum. “CDI” (Interbank certificate of deposit) represents
the average rate of all inter-bank overnight transactions in Brazil. The principal and the interest are paid semi-annually, with
final maturity in October 2020.
In April 2018, the Colombian subsidiary
executed an offtake and prepayment agreement with Trafigura, one of its customers. The prepayment agreement provided GeoPark with
access to up to US$ 25,000,000 in the form of prepaid future oil sales. The availability period for the prepayment agreement expires
on 31 March 2019. As of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements, GeoPark has not withdrawn any amount from this prepayment
agreement.
In September 2017, the Company successfully
placed US$ 425,000,000 Notes. These Notes carry a coupon of 6.50% per annum and their final maturity will be 21 September 2024.
The net proceeds from the Notes were used by the Group to fully repay the 7.50% senior secured Notes due 2020 and for general corporate
purposes, including capital expenditures and to repay other existing indebtedness.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
3 Financial Instruments-risk management
(continued)
Interest rate risk
The Group’s interest rate risk arises
from long-term borrowings issued at variable rates, which expose the Group to interest rate risk.
The Group does not face interest rate risk
on its US$ 425,000,000 Notes which carry a fixed rate coupon of 6.50% per annum. Consequently, the accruals and interest payment
are not substantially affected by the market interest rate changes.
At 31 December 2018, the outstanding
long-term borrowing affected by a variable rate amounted to US$ 19,750,000, representing 4.5% of total borrowings. It
corresponds to a loan from Santander Bank taken by the Brazilian subsidiary that has a floating interest rate based on CDI
(Interbank certificate of deposit), which represents the average rate of all inter-bank overnight transactions in Brazil.
The Group analyses its interest rate exposure
on a dynamic basis. Various scenarios are simulated taking into consideration refinancing, renewal of existing positions, alternative
financing and hedging. Based on these scenarios, the Group calculates the impact on profit and loss of a defined interest rate.
For each simulation, the same interest rate is used for all currencies. The scenarios are run only for liabilities that represent
the major interest-bearing positions.
At 31 December 2018, if 1% is added to interest
rates on currency-denominated borrowings with all other variables held constant, post-tax profit for the year would have been lower
by US$ 21,000 (no exposure to fluctuations in the interest rate in 2017 and post-tax loss higher by US$ 467,000 in 2016).
Capital risk management
The Group’s objectives when managing
capital are to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders
and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital.
Consistent with others in the industry,
the Group monitors capital on the basis of the gearing ratio. This ratio is calculated as net debt divided by total capital. Net
debt is calculated as total borrowings (including ‘current and non-current borrowings’ as shown in the consolidated
balance sheet) less cash and cash equivalents. Total capital is calculated as ‘equity’ as shown in the consolidated
balance sheet plus net debt.
The Group’s strategy, due to the market
conditions prevailing during the last years and the growth strategy of the Group, is to keep the gearing ratio within a 60% to
80% range.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
3 Financial Instruments-risk management
(continued)
Capital risk management (continued)
The gearing ratios at 31 December 2018 and
2017 were as follows:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
Net Debt
|
319,275
|
291,449
|
Total Equity
|
143,021
|
126,840
|
Total Capital
|
462,296
|
418,289
|
Gearing Ratio
|
69%
|
70%
|
Note
4 Accounting estimates and assumptions
Estimates and assumptions are used in preparing
the financial statements. Although these estimates are based on management's best knowledge of current events and actions, actual
results may differ. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors,
including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The key estimates and assumptions used in
these Consolidated Financial Statements are noted below:
|
·
|
Cash flow estimates for impairment assessments
of non-financial assets require assumptions about two primary elements: future prices and reserves. Estimates of future prices
require significant judgments about highly uncertain future events. Historically, oil and gas prices have exhibited significant
volatility. The Group's forecasts for oil and gas revenues are based on prices derived from future price forecasts amongst industry
analysts and internal assessments. Estimates of future cash flows are generally based on assumptions of long-term prices and operating
and development costs.
|
Given the significant assumptions
required and the possibility that actual conditions may differ, management considers the assessment of impairment to be a critical
accounting estimate (see Note 36).
The process of estimating reserves
is complex. It requires significant judgements and decisions based on available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic
data. The estimation of economically recoverable oil and natural gas reserves and related future net cash flows was performed based
on the Reserve Report as of 31 December 2018 prepared by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, an independent international consultancy to
the oil and gas industry based in Dallas. It incorporates many factors and assumptions including:
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
4 Accounting estimates and assumptions (continued)
|
o
|
expected reservoir characteristics based on geological, geophysical and engineering assessments;
|
|
o
|
future production rates based on historical performance and expected future operating and investment
activities;
|
|
o
|
future oil and gas prices and quality differentials;
|
|
o
|
assumed effects of regulation by governmental agencies; and
|
|
o
|
future development and operating costs.
|
Management believes these factors
and assumptions are reasonable based on the information available to them at the time of preparing the estimates. However, these
estimates may change substantially as additional data from ongoing development activities and production performance becomes available
and as economic conditions impacting oil and gas prices and costs change.
|
·
|
The Group adopts the successful efforts
method of accounting. The Management of the Group makes assessments and estimates regarding whether an exploration and evaluation
asset should continue to be carried forward as such when insufficient information exists. This assessment is made on a quarterly
basis considering the advice from qualified experts.
|
|
·
|
Oil and gas assets held in property plant
and equipment are mainly depreciated on a unit of production basis at a rate calculated by reference to proven and probable reserves
and incorporating the estimated future cost of developing and extracting those reserves. Future development costs are estimated
using assumptions as to the numbers of wells required to produce those reserves, the cost of the wells and future production facilities.
|
|
·
|
Obligations related to the abandonment
of wells once operations are terminated may result in the recognition of significant obligations. Estimating the future abandonment
costs is difficult and requires management to make estimates and judgments because most of the obligations are many years in the
future. Technologies and costs are constantly changing as well as political, environmental, safety and public relations considerations.
The Group has adopted the following criterion for recognizing well plugging and abandonment related costs: The present value of
future costs necessary for well plugging and abandonment is calculated for each area at the present value of the estimated future
expenditure. The liabilities recognized are based upon estimated future abandonment costs, wells subject to abandonment, time to
abandonment, and future inflation rates.
|
|
·
|
From time to time, the Group may be subject
to various lawsuits, claims and proceedings that arise in the normal course of business, including employment, commercial, tax,
environmental, safety and health matters. For example, from time to time, the Group receives notice of environmental, health and
safety violations. Based on what the Management of the Group currently knows, it is not expected any material impact on the financial
statements.
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
5 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow
The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow
shows the Group's cash flows for the year for operating, investing and financing activities and the change in cash and cash equivalents
during the year.
Cash flows from operating activities are
computed from the results for the year adjusted for non-cash operating items, changes in net working capital, and corporate tax.
Income tax paid is presented as a separate item under operating activities.
Cash flows from investing activities include
payments in connection with the purchase and sale of property, plant and equipment and cash flows relating to the purchase and
sale of enterprises to third parties, if any.
Cash flows from financing activities include
changes in equity, and proceeds from borrowings and repayment of loans.
Cash and cash equivalents include bank overdraft
and liquid funds with a term of less than three months.
The following chart describes non-cash transactions
related to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
(Decrease) Increase in asset retirement obligation
|
(4,355)
|
5,943
|
1,195
|
(Decrease) Increase in provisions for other long-term liabilities
|
(60)
|
2,053
|
3,468
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
1,100
|
11,759
|
(4,657)
|
Changes in working capital shown in the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow are disclosed as follows:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Increase in Prepaid taxes
|
(36,716)
|
(14,802)
|
(2,351)
|
Decrease (Increase) in Inventories
|
511
|
(2,031)
|
466
|
Decrease (Increase) in Trade receivables
|
3,423
|
(1,344)
|
(4,811)
|
Decrease (Increase) in Prepayments and other receivables and Other assets
|
655
|
(8,623)
|
(1,758)
|
Customer advance (repayments) payments
(a)
|
(10,000)
|
(10,000)
|
20,000
|
Security deposit utilised (granted) (Note 35.3)
|
15,600
|
(15,600)
|
-
|
Increase in Trade and other payables
|
20,169
|
27,122
|
374
|
|
(6,358)
|
(25,278)
|
11,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
In December 2015, the Colombian subsidiary entered into a prepayment agreement with Trafigura under
which GeoPark sells and deliver a portion of its Colombian crude oil production. Funds committed were repaid by the Group on a
monthly basis through future oil deliveries until December 2018.
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
6 Segment information
Operating segments are reported in a manner
consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker, who
is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the Executive
Committee. This committee is integrated by the CEO, COO, CFO and managers in charge of the Geoscience, Operations, Corporate Governance,
Finance and People departments. This committee reviews the Group’s internal reporting in order to assess performance and
to allocate resources. Management has determined the operating segments based on these reports. The committee considers the business
from a geographic perspective.
The Executive Committee assesses the performance
of the operating segments based on a measure of Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as profit for the period before net
finance cost, income tax, depreciation, amortization, certain non-cash items such as impairments and write-offs of unsuccessful
efforts, accrual of share-based payment, unrealized result on commodity risk management contracts and other non-recurring events.
Operating Netback is equivalent to Adjusted EBITDA before cash expenses included in Administrative, Geological and Geophysical
and Other operating expenses. Other information provided, except as noted below, to the Executive Committee is measured in a manner
consistent with that in the financial statements.
Segment areas (geographical segments):
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Peru
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
497,870
|
37,359
|
30,053
|
35,879
|
-
|
-
|
601,161
|
Sale of crude oil
|
496,341
|
17,402
|
1,198
|
30,549
|
-
|
-
|
545,490
|
Sale of gas
|
1,529
|
19,957
|
28,855
|
5,330
|
-
|
-
|
55,671
|
Realized loss on commodity
risk management contracts
|
(26,098)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(26,098)
|
Production and operating costs
|
(118,533)
|
(21,899)
|
(8,785)
|
(25,043)
|
-
|
-
|
(174,260)
|
Royalties
|
(62,710)
|
(1,473)
|
(2,820)
|
(4,833)
|
-
|
-
|
(71,836)
|
Transportation costs
|
(1,258)
|
(1,250)
|
-
|
(120)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,628)
|
Share-based payment
|
(461)
|
(226)
|
(37)
|
(154)
|
-
|
-
|
(878)
|
Other operating costs
|
(54,104)
|
(18,950)
|
(5,928)
|
(19,936)
|
-
|
-
|
(98,918)
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
309,357
|
(29,139)
|
4,370
|
(6,739)
|
(4,529)
|
(16,828)
|
256,492
|
Operating netback
|
352,672
|
15,153
|
21,306
|
8,527
|
-
|
-
|
397,658
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
319,447
|
8,784
|
17,908
|
4,576
|
(7,077)
|
(13,082)
|
330,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
(42,721)
|
(28,203)
|
(10,395)
|
(10,640)
|
(245)
|
(36)
|
(92,240)
|
Reversal (recognition) of
impairment losses
|
11,531
|
(6,549)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4,982
|
Write-off
|
(17,665)
|
(6,121)
|
(2,020)
|
(583)
|
-
|
-
|
(26,389)
|
Total assets
|
383,450
|
276,449
|
70,424
|
87,259
|
35,817
|
9,261
|
862,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees (average)
|
182
|
101
|
12
|
121
|
27
|
2
|
445
|
Employees at year end
|
178
|
100
|
12
|
137
|
28
|
2
|
457
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
6 Segment information (continued)
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Peru
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
263,076
|
32,738
|
34,238
|
70
|
-
|
-
|
330,122
|
Sale of crude oil
|
262,309
|
15,873
|
910
|
70
|
-
|
-
|
279,162
|
Sale of gas
|
767
|
16,865
|
33,328
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
50,960
|
Realized loss on commodity
risk management contracts
|
(2,148)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,148)
|
Production and operating costs
|
(66,913)
|
(20,999)
|
(10,737)
|
(338)
|
-
|
-
|
(98,987)
|
Royalties
|
(24,236)
|
(1,314)
|
(3,134)
|
(13)
|
-
|
-
|
(28,697)
|
Transportation costs
|
(1,678)
|
(1,211)
|
-
|
(80)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,969)
|
Share-based payment
|
(248)
|
(170)
|
(39)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(457)
|
Other operating costs
|
(40,751)
|
(18,304)
|
(7,564)
|
(245)
|
-
|
-
|
(66,864)
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
116,290
|
(19,675)
|
4,434
|
(3,430)
|
(3,850)
|
(14,773)
|
78,996
|
Operating netback
|
194,013
|
11,222
|
23,540
|
(467)
|
-
|
-
|
228,308
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
168,303
|
4,070
|
20,166
|
(2,183)
|
(3,505)
|
(11,075)
|
175,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
(40,010)
|
(23,730)
|
(10,809)
|
(159)
|
(139)
|
(38)
|
(74,885)
|
Write-off
|
(1,625)
|
(546)
|
(2,978)
|
(685)
|
-
|
-
|
(5,834)
|
Total assets
|
288,429
|
301,931
|
91,604
|
30,924
|
22,099
|
51,176
|
786,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees (average)
|
164
|
102
|
12
|
88
|
13
|
-
|
379
|
Employees at year end
|
180
|
102
|
12
|
92
|
19
|
-
|
405
|
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Peru
|
Corporate
|
Total
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
126,228
|
36,723
|
29,719
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
192,670
|
Sale of crude oil
|
125,731
|
18,774
|
688
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
145,193
|
Sale of gas
|
497
|
17,949
|
29,031
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
47,477
|
Realized gain on commodity
risk management contracts
|
514
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
514
|
Production and operating costs
|
(36,607)
|
(22,169)
|
(8,459)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(67,235)
|
Royalties
|
(7,281)
|
(1,495)
|
(2,721)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(11,497)
|
Transportation costs
|
(1,111)
|
(1,170)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,281)
|
Share-based payment
|
(413)
|
(138)
|
(71)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(622)
|
Other operating costs
|
(27,802)
|
(19,366)
|
(5,667)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(52,835)
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
31,463
|
(44,969)
|
(645)
|
370
|
(3,147)
|
(11,685)
|
(28,613)
|
Operating netback
|
87,523
|
13,696
|
21,356
|
(378)
|
41
|
(91)
|
122,147
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
66,921
|
5,159
|
17,487
|
1,848
|
(2,607)
|
(10,487)
|
78,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
(31,148)
|
(31,355)
|
(12,974)
|
(150)
|
(130)
|
(17)
|
(75,774)
|
Reversal of impairment losses
|
5,664
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
5,664
|
Write-off
|
(7,394)
|
(19,389)
|
(4,583)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(31,366)
|
Total assets
|
182,784
|
317,969
|
99,904
|
6,071
|
5,020
|
28,792
|
640,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees (average)
|
138
|
102
|
10
|
80
|
11
|
-
|
341
|
Employees at year end
|
146
|
102
|
10
|
77
|
10
|
-
|
345
|
Approximately 78% of capital expenditure
was incurred by Colombia (76% in 2017 and 67% in 2016), 6% was incurred by Chile (10% in 2017 and 20% in 2016), 2% was incurred
by Brazil (3% in 2017 and 9% in 2016), 7% was incurred by Argentina (8% in 2017 and 4% in 2016) and 7% was incurred by Peru ( 3%
in 2017 and nil in 2016).
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
6 Segment information (continued)
A reconciliation of total Operating netback
to total profit (loss) before income tax is provided as follows:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Operating netback
|
397,658
|
228,308
|
122,147
|
Administrative expenses
|
(48,028)
|
(38,937)
|
(32,323)
|
Geological and geophysical expenses
|
(19,074)
|
(13,595)
|
(11,503)
|
Adjusted EBITDA for reportable segments
|
330,556
|
175,776
|
78,321
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on commodity risk management contracts
|
42,271
|
(13,300)
|
(3,068)
|
Depreciation
(a)
|
(92,240)
|
(74,885)
|
(75,774)
|
Share-based payment
|
(5,446)
|
(4,075)
|
(3,367)
|
Impairment and write-off of unsuccessful exploration efforts
|
(21,407)
|
(5,834)
|
(25,702)
|
Others
(b)
|
2,758
|
1,314
|
977
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
256,492
|
78,996
|
(28,613)
|
Financial expenses
|
(39,321)
|
(53,511)
|
(36,229)
|
Financial income
|
3,059
|
2,016
|
2,128
|
Foreign exchange (loss) profit
|
(11,323)
|
(2,193)
|
13,872
|
Profit (Loss) before tax
|
208,907
|
25,308
|
(48,842)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Net of capitalized costs for oil stock included in Inventories.
|
|
(b)
|
Includes allocation to capitalized projects.
|
Note
7 Revenue
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Sale of crude oil
|
545,490
|
279,162
|
145,193
|
Sale of gas
|
55,671
|
50,960
|
47,477
|
|
601,161
|
330,122
|
192,670
|
Note
8 Commodity risk management contracts
The Group has entered into derivative financial
instruments to manage its exposure to oil price risk. These derivatives are zero-premium collars or zero-premium 3-ways (put spread
plus call), and were placed with major financial institutions and commodity traders. The Group entered into the derivatives under
ISDA Master Agreements and Credit Support Annexes, which provide credit lines for collateral posting thus alleviating possible
liquidity needs under the instruments and protect the Group from potential non-performance risk by its counterparties. The Group’s
derivatives are accounted for as non-hedge derivatives as of 31 December 2018 and therefore all changes in the fair values of its
derivative contracts are recognized as gains or losses in the results of the periods in which they occur.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
8 Commodity risk management contracts
(continued)
The following table presents the Group’s
derivative contracts in force as of 31 December 2018:
Period
|
Reference
|
Type
|
Volume bbl/d
|
Price US$/bbl
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 April 2018 - 31 December 2018
|
ICE BRENT
|
Zero Premium 3 Way
|
3,000
|
45.00-55.00 Put 77.15 Call
|
1 April 2018 - 31 December 2018
|
ICE BRENT
|
Zero Premium 3 Way
|
1,000
|
45.00-55.00 Put 77.50 Call
|
1 July 2018 - 31 March 2019
|
ICE BRENT
|
Zero Premium 3 Way
|
2,000
|
50.00-60.00 Put 97.00 Call
|
1 July 2018 - 31 March 2019
|
ICE BRENT
|
Zero Premium 3 Way
|
2,000
|
50.00-60.00 Put 97.05 Call
|
1 October 2018 - 30 June 2019
|
ICE BRENT
|
Zero Premium 3 Way
|
3,700
|
55.00-65.00 Put 90.00 Call
|
1 October 2018 - 30 June 2019
|
ICE BRENT
|
Zero Premium 3 Way
|
1,000
|
55.00-65.00 Put 90.10 Call
|
1 October 2018 - 30 June 2019
|
ICE BRENT
|
Zero Premium 3 Way
|
1,300
|
55.00-65.00 Put 90.50 Call
|
1 January 2019 - 30 September 2019
|
ICE BRENT
|
Zero Premium Collar
|
2,000
|
65.00 Put 92.50 Call
|
1 January 2019 - 30 September 2019
|
ICE BRENT
|
Zero Premium Collar
|
3,000
|
65.00 Put 92.26 Call
|
The table below summarizes the gain (loss)
on the commodity risk management contracts:
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Realized (loss) gain on commodity risk management contracts
|
(26,098)
|
(2,148)
|
514
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on commodity risk management contracts
|
42,271
|
(13,300)
|
(3,068)
|
Total
|
16,173
|
(15,448)
|
(2,554)
|
Note
9 Production and operating costs
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Well and facilities maintenance
|
20,262
|
14,722
|
13,160
|
Operation and maintenance
|
7,756
|
3,116
|
2,137
|
Staff costs (Note 11)
|
17,725
|
11,901
|
8,722
|
Share-based payment (Note 11)
|
878
|
457
|
622
|
Royalties
|
71,836
|
28,697
|
11,497
|
Consumables
|
17,444
|
11,902
|
8,283
|
Transportation costs
|
2,628
|
2,969
|
2,281
|
Equipment rental
|
9,317
|
5,818
|
3,868
|
Safety and Insurance costs
|
3,878
|
2,591
|
2,222
|
Gas plant costs
|
5,967
|
6,069
|
6,300
|
Field camp
|
2,959
|
2,377
|
1,687
|
Non-operated blocks costs
|
1,327
|
1,213
|
1,082
|
Other costs
|
12,283
|
7,155
|
5,374
|
|
174,260
|
98,987
|
67,235
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
10 Depreciation
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Oil and gas properties
|
72,130
|
57,725
|
61,080
|
Production facilities and machinery
|
17,958
|
14,558
|
10,788
|
Furniture, equipment and vehicles
|
1,579
|
1,948
|
2,702
|
Buildings and improvements
|
996
|
844
|
920
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
(a)
|
92,663
|
75,075
|
75,490
|
Related to:
Productive assets
|
90,088
|
72,283
|
71,868
|
Administrative assets
|
2,575
|
2,792
|
3,622
|
Depreciation total
(a)
|
92,663
|
75,075
|
75,490
|
(a)
Depreciation without considering
capitalized costs for oil stock included in Inventories.
Note
11 Staff costs and Directors Remuneration
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Number of employees at year end
|
457
|
405
|
345
|
Amounts in US$ '000
|
|
|
|
Wages and salaries
|
52,644
|
41,775
|
33,922
|
Share-based payments (Note 30)
|
5,446
|
4,075
|
3,367
|
Social security charges
|
7,464
|
5,364
|
3,792
|
Director’s fees and allowance
|
2,876
|
3,458
|
2,088
|
|
68,430
|
54,672
|
43,169
|
Recognized as follows:
Production and operating costs
|
18,603
|
12,358
|
9,344
|
Geological and geophysical expenses
|
15,527
|
11,026
|
10,439
|
Administrative expenses
|
34,300
|
31,288
|
23,386
|
|
68,430
|
54,672
|
43,169
|
Board of Directors’ and key managers’ remuneration
|
|
|
|
Salaries and fees
|
12,452
|
9,674
|
7,337
|
Share-based payments
|
2,918
|
2,322
|
1,211
|
Other benefits in kind
|
272
|
287
|
112
|
|
15,642
|
12,283
|
8,660
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
11 Staff costs and Directors Remuneration
(continued)
Directors’ Remuneration
|
Executive Directors’ Fees (in US$)
|
Executive Directors’ Bonus (in US$)
|
Non-Executive Directors’ Fees (in US$)
|
Director Fees Paid in Shares (No. of Shares)
|
Cash Equivalent Total Remuneration
(in US$)
|
Gerald O’Shaughnessy
|
400,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
400,000
|
James F. Park
|
800,000
|
695,506
|
-
|
-
|
1,495,506
|
Pedro E. Aylwin
(a)
|
26,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
26,000
|
Juan Cristóbal Pavez
(b)
|
-
|
-
|
110,000
|
7,596
|
210,000
|
Carlos Gulisano
(c)
|
-
|
-
|
110,000
|
7,596
|
210,000
|
Robert Bedingfield
(d)
|
-
|
-
|
110,000
|
7,596
|
210,000
|
Jamie Coulter
|
-
|
-
|
75,000
|
7,596
|
175,000
|
Constantine Papadimitriou
|
-
|
-
|
40,000
|
2,761
|
90,000
|
a
Pedro E. Aylwin has a service contract that provides for him to act as Director of Legal and Governance.
b
Compensation Committee Chairman.
c
Technical Committee Chairman.
d
Audit Committee Chairman.
On 2 January 2019, 439,075 shares were issued
to Directors as a consequence of the vesting of the Value Creation Plan (”VCP”). See Note 30.
Note
12 Geological and geophysical expenses
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Staff costs (Note 11)
|
15,005
|
10,525
|
9,541
|
Share-based payment (Note 11)
|
522
|
501
|
898
|
Allocation to capitalized project
|
(5,645)
|
(6,402)
|
(2,119)
|
Other services
|
4,069
|
3,070
|
1,962
|
|
13,951
|
7,694
|
10,282
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
13 Administrative expenses
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Staff costs (Note 11)
|
27,378
|
24,713
|
19,451
|
Share-based
payment (Note 11)
|
4,046
|
3,117
|
1,847
|
Consultant fees
|
7,427
|
5,120
|
3,894
|
Office expenses
|
3,021
|
2,506
|
2,217
|
Travel expenses
|
3,730
|
2,772
|
1,717
|
Director’s fees and allowance (Note 11)
|
2,876
|
3,458
|
2,088
|
Communication and IT costs
|
2,395
|
2,109
|
2,013
|
Allocation to joint operations
|
(7,774)
|
(7,646)
|
(4,365)
|
Other administrative expenses
|
8,975
|
5,905
|
5,308
|
|
52,074
|
42,054
|
34,170
|
Note
14 Selling expenses
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Transportation
|
2,638
|
864
|
3,559
|
Selling taxes and other
|
1,385
|
272
|
663
|
|
4,023
|
1,136
|
4,222
|
Note
15 Financial results
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Financial expenses
|
|
|
|
Interest and amortization of debt issue costs
|
(28,955)
|
(27,823)
|
(28,984)
|
Interest with related parties
|
(1,606)
|
(2,224)
|
(1,587)
|
Less: amounts capitalized on qualifying assets
|
258
|
611
|
255
|
Borrowings cancellation costs
|
-
|
(17,575)
|
-
|
Bank charges and other financial results
|
(5,513)
|
(3,721)
|
(3,220)
|
Unwinding of long-term liabilities
|
(3,505)
|
(2,779)
|
(2,693)
|
|
(39,321)
|
(53,511)
|
(36,229)
|
Financial income
|
|
|
|
Interest received
|
3,059
|
2,016
|
2,128
|
|
3,059
|
2,016
|
2,128
|
Foreign exchange gains and losses
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange (loss) gain
|
(11,323)
|
(2,193)
|
13,872
|
|
(11,323)
|
(2,193)
|
13,872
|
Total Financial results
|
(47,585)
|
(53,688)
|
(20,229)
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
16 Tax reforms
Colombia
In December 2018, a tax reform was enacted
in Colombia. The approved legislation included significant changes in the corporate income tax but also in other taxes and in tax
related matters (as procedural rules and special regimes). This tax reform was effective 1 January 2019.
The new legislation includes a progressive
reduction of the general corporate income tax rate, previously established at 40% for 2017 and 37% for 2018, as follows:
|
·
|
30% in 2022 and onwards.
|
Other changes that could affect the Group
are the following:
|
·
|
The withholding tax rate on dividends for
non-resident shareholders was increased from 5% to 7.5%.
|
|
·
|
The withholding tax rates applicable on
payments to non-residents on behalf of consultancy, technical services, technical assistance, software and interests on loans of
less than one year were increased from 15% to 20% (for loans with maturity exceeding one year, the 15% rate remained unchanged).
|
|
·
|
The withholding tax rate applicable on
payments to entities resident of countries considered to be tax havens, non-cooperative or to grant a preferential tax regime was
increased from 15% to the corporate income tax rate (33 % for 2019, 32% for 2020, 31% for 2021 and 30% for 2022 and onwards).
|
|
·
|
The deduction of interest attributed to
a permanent establishment in Colombia on behalf of its head office debt was limited to interest that had been subject to Colombian
withholding tax.
|
|
·
|
Regarding thin capitalization for income
tax purposes, the maximum amount of debt which interest can be deducted was reduced from 3 to 2 times the net equity of the taxpayer
as of 31 December of the previous year.
|
|
·
|
Transfers of participations in foreign
entities that represent indirect disposals of assets in Colombia became subject to income tax or to the occasional earnings tax,
depending on certain circumstances.
|
|
·
|
VAT paid for acquisition of productive
fixed assets could be credited against corporate income tax.
|
|
·
|
An audit benefit was granted by the reform,
establishing that tax returns of FY 2019 and 2020 showing a net income tax 30% or 20% higher, respectively, than the one declared
in the previous year would be considered definitive 6 months or 12 months after became due, also respectively, if there were no
objections or requests from the tax authority.
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
16 Tax reforms (Continued)
Argentina
A tax reform has
been enacted in Argentina during December 2017. The legislation included significant changes to certain corporate income tax and
statutory income tax provisions, including rate reductions. Most of the tax provisions are effective from fiscal year 2018.
With this tax reform,
the corporate income tax, previously established at 35%, will have the following rate schedule:
|
·
|
25% in 2020 and 2021 and onwards.
|
Other changes include
the following:
|
·
|
New withholding tax on dividends, with
the applicable rates for non-resident shareholders of: (1) 7% for dividends distributed out of the distributing entity’s
previously taxed profits of fiscal years 2018 and 2019; and (2) 13% for dividends distributed out of the distributing entity’s
previously taxed profits of fiscal years 2020 and onwards.
|
|
·
|
Application of inflation adjustment for
corporate tax purposes is reinstated under certain circumstances.
|
|
·
|
Possible tax revaluation of investment
in fixed assets, under payment of a special tax.
|
|
·
|
Allow for short-term recovery of VAT paid
on acquisitions or imports of capital goods, when non-recoverable with VAT on usual sales.
|
Note
17 Income tax
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Current tax
|
(101,456)
|
(48,449)
|
(12,359)
|
Deferred income tax (Note 18)
|
(4,784)
|
5,304
|
555
|
|
(106,240)
|
(43,145)
|
(11,804)
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
17 Income tax (continued)
The tax on the Group’s profit (loss)
before tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the weighted average tax rate applicable to profits of the
consolidated entities as follows:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Profit (Loss) before tax
|
208,907
|
25,308
|
(48,842)
|
Tax losses from non-taxable jurisdictions
|
42,808
|
22,708
|
12,318
|
Taxable profit (loss)
|
251,715
|
48,016
|
(36,524)
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax calculated at domestic tax rates applicable to Profit (Losses) in the respective countries
|
(102,211)
|
(31,107)
|
(809)
|
Tax losses where no deferred tax benefit is recognized
|
(7,344)
|
(8,111)
|
(6,616)
|
Effect of currency translation on tax base
|
3,336
|
(2,330)
|
(2,840)
|
Changes in the income tax rate (Note 16)
|
(1,874)
|
542
|
220
|
Previously unrecognized tax losses
|
4,882
|
-
|
-
|
Non-taxable results
(a)
|
(3,029)
|
(2,139)
|
(1,759)
|
Income tax
|
(106,240)
|
(43,145)
|
(11,804)
|
|
(a)
|
Includes non-deductible expenses in each jurisdiction and changes in the estimation of deferred
tax assets and liabilities.
|
Under current Bermuda law, the Company is
not required to pay any taxes in Bermuda on income or capital gains. The Company has received an undertaking from the Minister
of Finance in Bermuda that, in the event of any taxes being imposed, they will be exempt from taxation in Bermuda until March 2035.
Income tax rates in those countries where the Group operates (Colombia, Chile, Brazil, Argentina and Peru) ranges from 15% to 37%.
The Group has significant tax losses available
which can be utilised against future taxable profit in the following countries:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Chile
(a)
|
315,733
|
345,104
|
280,290
|
Brazil
(a)
|
38,011
|
33,721
|
16,057
|
Argentina
(b)
|
5,490
|
4,849
|
2,908
|
Total tax losses at 31 December
|
359,234
|
383,674
|
299,255
|
(a)
Taxable losses have no expiration
date.
(b)
Expiring dates for tax losses
accumulated at 31 December 2018 are:
Expiring date
|
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2021
|
372
|
2022
|
5,118
|
At the balance sheet date deferred tax assets
in respect of tax losses in certain companies in Chile have not been recognized as there is insufficient evidence of future taxable
profits to offset them.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
18 Deferred income tax
The gross movement on the deferred income tax
account is as follows:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
Deferred tax at 1 January
|
25,350
|
20,283
|
Currency translation differences
|
(3,574)
|
(237)
|
Income statement (charge) credit
|
(4,784)
|
5,304
|
Deferred tax at 31 December
|
16,992
|
25,350
|
The breakdown and movement of deferred tax
assets and liabilities as of 31 December 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
At the beginning of year
|
(Charged) Credited to net profit
|
Currency translation differences
|
Reclassification
|
At the end of year
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference in depreciation rates and other
|
16,171
|
(16,383)
|
(1,897)
|
(968)
|
(3,077)
|
Taxable losses
|
11,465
|
4,869
|
(1,677)
|
20,213
|
34,870
|
Total 2018
|
27,636
|
(11,514)
|
(3,574)
|
19,245
|
31,793
|
Total 2017
|
23,053
|
4,820
|
(237)
|
-
|
27,636
|
Amounts in US$ '000
|
At the beginning of year
|
Credited (Charged) to net profit
|
Reclassification
|
At
the end of year
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Difference in depreciation rates and other
|
(20,074)
|
4,305
|
968
|
(14,801)
|
Taxable losses
|
17,788
|
2,425
|
(20,213)
|
-
|
Total 2018
|
(2,286)
|
6,730
|
(19,245)
|
(14,801)
|
Total 2017
|
(2,770)
|
484
|
-
|
(2,286)
|
Note
19 Earnings per share
Amounts in US$ '000 except for shares
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Numerator: Profit (Loss) for the year attributable to owners
|
72,415
|
(24,228)
|
(49,092)
|
Denominator: Weighted average number of shares used in basic EPS
|
60,612,230
|
60,093,191
|
59,777,145
|
Earnings (Losses) after tax per share (US$) – basic
|
1.19
|
(0.40)
|
(0.82)
|
Amounts in US$ '000 except for shares
|
2018
|
2017
(a)
|
2016
(a)
|
Weighted average number of shares used in basic EPS
|
60,612,230
|
60,093,191
|
59,777,145
|
Effect of dilutive potential common shares
(a)
|
|
|
|
Stock awards at US$ 0.001
|
4,758,552
|
-
|
-
|
Weighted average
number of common shares for the
purposes of diluted earnings
per shares
|
65,370,782
|
60,093,191
|
59,777,145
|
Earnings (Losses) after tax per share (US$) – diluted
|
1.11
|
(0.40)
|
(0.82)
|
(a)
For the year ended 31 December
2017, there were 4,564,777 (1,390,706 in 2016) of potential shares that could have a dilutive impact. They were considered antidilutive
due to negative earnings.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
20 Property, plant and equipment
Amounts in US$'000
|
|
Oil & gas properties
|
Furniture, equipment
and vehicles
|
Production facilities and machinery
|
Buildings
and improvements
|
Construction in progress
|
Exploration and evaluation assets
(b)
|
Total
|
Cost at 1 January 2016
|
|
648,992
|
13,745
|
124,832
|
10,518
|
29,823
|
87,000
|
914,910
|
Additions
|
|
(3,531)
(a)
|
406
|
466
|
-
|
20,322
|
18,181
|
35,844
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
16,132
|
126
|
2,077
|
35
|
73
|
790
|
19,233
|
Disposals
|
|
-
|
(22)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(22)
|
Write-off / Impairment reversal
|
|
5,664
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(31,366)
(c)
|
(25,702)
|
Transfers
|
|
24,984
|
102
|
5,038
|
-
|
(17,292)
|
(12,832)
|
-
|
Cost at 31 December 2016
|
|
692,241
|
14,357
|
132,413
|
10,553
|
32,926
|
61,773
|
944,263
|
Additions
|
|
7,997
(a)
|
954
|
-
|
-
|
66,953
|
49,455
|
125,359
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
(1,142)
|
(12)
|
(147)
|
(3)
|
(62)
|
(104)
|
(1,470)
|
Disposals
|
|
-
|
(112)
|
-
|
(189)
|
-
|
-
|
(301)
|
Write-off
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(5,834)
(d)
|
(5,834)
|
Transfers
|
|
77,408
|
211
|
25,130
|
-
|
(61,827)
|
(40,922)
|
-
|
Cost at 31 December 2017
|
|
776,504
|
15,398
|
157,396
|
10,361
|
37,990
|
64,368
|
1,062,017
|
Additions
|
|
(5,753)
(a)
|
1,706
|
-
|
-
|
81,961
|
43,515
|
121,429
|
Acquisitions (Note 35.3)
|
|
52,925
|
254
|
1,616
|
134
|
-
|
-
|
54,929
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
(11,525)
|
(130)
|
(884)
|
(30)
|
(15)
|
(882)
|
(13,466)
|
Disposals
|
|
-
|
(46)
|
(417)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(463)
|
Write-off / Impairment reversal
|
|
5,109
|
-
|
(120)
|
-
|
(7)
|
(26,389)
(e)
|
(21,407)
|
Transfers
|
|
63,794
|
566
|
14,503
|
1,089
|
(59,332)
|
(20,620)
|
-
|
Assets held for sale (Note 35.2)
|
|
(163,544)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(163,544)
|
Cost at 31 December 2018
|
|
717,510
|
17,748
|
172,094
|
11,554
|
60,597
|
59,992
|
1,039,495
|
Depreciation and write-down at
1 January 2016
|
|
(321,173)
|
(7,317)
|
(60,614)
|
(3,195)
|
-
|
-
|
(392,299)
|
Depreciation
|
|
(61,080)
|
(2,702)
|
(10,788)
|
(920)
|
-
|
-
|
(75,490)
|
Disposals
|
|
-
|
8
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
(2,486)
|
(38)
|
(296)
|
(16)
|
-
|
-
|
(2,836)
|
Depreciation and write-down at
31 December 2016
|
|
(384,739)
|
(10,049)
|
(71,698)
|
(4,131)
|
-
|
-
|
(470,617)
|
Depreciation
|
|
(57,725)
|
(1,948)
|
(14,558)
|
(844)
|
-
|
-
|
(75,075)
|
Disposals
|
|
-
|
73
|
-
|
38
|
-
|
-
|
111
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
930
|
8
|
24
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
967
|
Depreciation and write-down at
31 December 2017
|
|
(441,534)
|
(11,916)
|
(86,232)
|
(4,932)
|
-
|
-
|
(544,614)
|
Depreciation
|
|
(72,130)
|
(1,579)
|
(17,958)
|
(996)
|
-
|
-
|
(92,663)
|
Disposals
|
|
-
|
42
|
149
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
191
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
6,292
|
92
|
337
|
26
|
-
|
-
|
6,747
|
Assets held for sale (Note 35.2)
|
|
148,014
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
148,014
|
Depreciation and write-down at
31 December 2018
|
|
(359,358)
|
(13,361)
|
(103,704)
|
(5,902)
|
-
|
-
|
(482,325)
|
Carrying amount at
31
December 2016
|
|
307,502
|
4,308
|
60,715
|
6,422
|
32,926
|
61,773
|
473,646
|
Carrying amount at
31
December 2017
|
|
334,970
|
3,482
|
71,164
|
5,429
|
37,990
|
64,368
|
517,403
|
Carrying amount at
31
December 2018
|
|
358,152
|
4,387
|
68,390
|
5,652
|
60,597
|
59,992
|
557,170
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
20 Property, plant and equipment (continued)
(a)
Corresponds to the effect
of change in estimate of assets retirement obligations.
(b)
Exploration wells movement
and balances are shown in the table below; seismic and other exploratory assets amount to US$ 48,779,000 (US$ 53,764,000 in 2017
and US$ 53,523,000 in 2016).
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Total
|
Exploration wells at 31 December 2016
|
8,250
|
Additions
|
35,299
|
Write-offs
|
(3,664)
|
Transfers
|
(29,281)
|
Exploration wells at 31 December 2017
|
10,604
|
Additions
|
43,103
|
Write-offs
|
(23,733)
|
Transfers
|
(18,761)
|
Exploration wells at 31 December 2018
|
11,213
|
As of 31 December 2018, there were nine
exploratory wells that have been capitalized for a period less than a year amounting to US$ 10,069,000 and three exploratory wells
that have been capitalized for a period over a year amounting to US$ 1,144,000.
(c)
Corresponds to the write-off
of five wells drilled in previous years in the Chilean blocks for which no additional work would be performed, the loss generated
by the write-off of the seismic cost for Llanos 62 Block in Colombia generated by the relinquishment of the area in September 2016.
In addition, during September 2016, five blocks in Brazil were relinquished so the associated investment was written off.
(d)
Corresponds to five unsuccessful
exploratory wells, one well drilled in Colombia (Llanos 34 Block), one well drilled in Brazil (REC-T-94 Block) and three non-operated
wells drilled in Argentina (Puelen and Sierra del Nevado Blocks) in 2017. The charge also includes the loss generated by the write-off
of the seismic cost for Campanario and Isla Norte Blocks in Chile generated by the relinquishment of 327 sq km in 2017.
(e)
Corresponds to nine unsuccessful
exploratory wells, four wells drilled in Colombia (Tiple, Llanos 34 and Llanos 32 Blocks), two wells drilled in Brazil (POT-T-747
and POT-T-619 Blocks) and three wells drilled in Argentina (Puelen Block). The change also includes the write-off of a well and
other exploration costs incurred in the Fell Block (Chile) in previous years and other exploration costs incurred in the VIM-3
Block (Colombia), and POT-T-882 and REC-T-93 Blocks (Brazil), for which no additional work would be performed.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
21 Subsidiary undertakings
The following chart illustrates main companies
of the Group structure as of 31 December 2018:
Non-controlling interest that used to be
held by LG International until 28 November 2018:
|
·
|
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income: Total comprehensive income for the year 2018 includes a profit of US$ 35,284,000 (US$ 13,536,000 in 2017 and US$ 2,791,000
in 2016), a loss of US$ 4,273,000 (US$ 6,200,000 in 2017 and US$ 10,379,000 in 2016) and a loss of US$ 758,000 (US$ 945,000 in
2017 and US$ 3,966,000 in 2016) corresponding to non-controlling interest that used to be held by LGI in GeoPark Colombia Coöperatie
U.A., GeoPark Chile S.A. and GeoPark TdF S.A., respectively.
|
|
·
|
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position:
Total Equity as of 31 December 2017 included US$ 29,330,000, US$ 15,953,000 and a negative amount of US$ 3,368,000 corresponding
to non-controlling interest that used to be held by LGI in GeoPark Colombia Coöperatie U.A., GeoPark Chile S.A. and GeoPark
TdF S.A., respectively.
|
|
·
|
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity:
Dividends distributed to non-controlling interest of US$ 8,089,000 in 2018 (US$ 479,000 in 2017 and US$ 6,406,000 in 2016) correspond
to non-controlling interest that used to be held by LGI in GeoPark Colombia Coöperatie U.A.
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
21 Subsidiary undertakings (continued)
Details of the subsidiaries and joint operations
of the Group are set out below:
|
Name and registered office
|
|
|
Ownership interest
|
Subsidiaries
|
GeoPark Argentina Limited (Bermuda)
|
|
|
100%
|
|
GeoPark Argentina Limited – Argentinean Branch (Argentina)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Latin America Limited (Bermuda)
|
|
|
100%
|
|
GeoPark Latin America Limited – Agencia en Chile (Chile)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark S.A. (Chile)
|
|
|
100% (a) (b)
|
|
GeoPark Brazil Exploração y Produção de Petróleo e Gás Ltda. (Brazil)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Chile S.A. (Chile)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Fell S.p.A. (Chile)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Magallanes Limitada (Chile)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark TdF S.A. (Chile)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Colombia S.A. (Chile)
|
|
|
100% (a) (b)
|
|
GeoPark Colombia S.A.S. (Colombia)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Latin America S.L.U. (Spain)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Colombia Coöperatie U.A. (The Netherlands)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark S.A.C. (Peru)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Perú S.A.C. (Peru)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Operadora del Perú S.A.C. (Peru)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Peru S.L.U. (Spain)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Brasil S.L.U. (Spain)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Colombia E&P S.A. (Panama)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Colombia E&P Sucursal Colombia (Colombia)
|
|
|
100% (a)
|
|
GeoPark Mexico S.A.P.I. de C.V. (Mexico)
|
|
|
100% (a) (b)
|
|
GeoPark E&P S.A.P.I. de C.V. (Mexico)
|
|
|
100% (a) (b)
|
|
GeoPark (UK) Limited (United Kingdom)
|
|
|
100%
|
Joint operations
|
Tranquilo Block (Chile)
|
|
|
50% (c)
|
|
Flamenco Block (Chile)
|
|
|
50% (c)
|
|
Campanario Block (Chile)
|
|
|
50% (c)
|
|
Isla Norte Block (Chile)
|
|
|
60% (c)
|
|
Llanos 34 Block (Colombia)
|
|
|
45% (c)
|
|
Llanos 32 Block (Colombia)
|
|
|
12.5%
|
|
Puelen Block (Argentina)
|
|
|
18%
|
|
Sierra del Nevado Block (Argentina)
|
|
|
18%
|
|
CN-V Block (Argentina)
|
|
|
50%
|
|
Manati Field (Brazil)
|
|
|
10%
|
|
POT-T-747 Block (Brazil)
|
|
|
70% (c)
|
|
REC-T-128 Block (Brazil)
|
|
|
70% (c)
|
|
(c)
|
GeoPark
is the operator.
|
Corporate structure reorganization
During 2017, the Company decided to incorporate
a subsidiary in the United Kingdom (international investor centre) to actively conduct the strategic business and financial decisions
of the Group. Also, to enhance protection to the Group’s investments in Latin America and because of a predicted change of
the Dutch dividend withholding tax act that would unjustifiably affect the Group’s operating cash flow, GeoPark decided to
re-domiciliate the Group´s sub-holdings from the Netherlands to Spain (jurisdiction with a broad network of Investment Promotion
and Protection Agreements with Latin American countries).
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
22 Prepaid taxes
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
V.A.T.
|
37,811
|
27,674
|
Income tax payments in advance
|
9,668
|
1,258
|
Other prepaid taxes
|
966
|
939
|
Total prepaid taxes
|
48,445
|
29,871
|
Classified as follows:
|
|
|
Current
|
45,170
|
26,048
|
Non-current
|
3,275
|
3,823
|
Total prepaid taxes
|
48,445
|
29,871
|
Note
23 Inventories
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
Crude oil
|
3,369
|
1,969
|
Materials and spares
|
5,940
|
3,769
|
|
9,309
|
5,738
|
Note
24 Trade receivables and Prepayments
and other receivables
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
Trade receivables
|
16,215
|
19,519
|
|
16,215
|
19,519
|
To be recovered from co-venturers (Note 33)
|
1,819
|
2,455
|
Related parties receivables (Note 33)
|
-
|
56
|
Prepayments and other receivables
|
7,889
|
5,242
|
|
9,708
|
7,753
|
Total
|
25,923
|
27,272
|
|
|
|
Classified as follows:
|
|
|
Current
|
25,704
|
27,037
|
Non-current
|
219
|
235
|
Total
|
25,923
|
27,272
|
Trade receivables that are aged by less
than three months are not considered impaired. As of 31 December 2018 and 2017, there are no balances that were aged by more than
3 months, but not impaired. These relate to customers for whom there is no recent history of default. There are no balances overdue
between 31 days and 90 days as of 31 December 2018 and 2017.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
24 Trade receivables and Prepayments
and other receivables (continued)
Movements on the Group provision for impairment
are as follows:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
At 1 January
|
594
|
741
|
Foreign exchange income
|
(48)
|
(147)
|
|
546
|
594
|
The credit period for trade receivables
is 30 days. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of each class of receivable. The Group
does not hold any collateral as security related to trade receivables.
The carrying value of trade receivables
is considered to represent a reasonable approximation of its fair value due to their short-term nature.
Note
25 Financial instruments by category
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Assets as per statement of financial position
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
Derivative financial instrument assets
|
|
27,539
|
-
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
53,794
|
44,123
|
|
|
|
81,333
|
44,123
|
|
Other financial assets at amortized cost
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
16,215
|
19,519
|
|
To be recovered from co-venturers (Note 33)
|
|
1,819
|
2,455
|
|
Other financial assets
(a)
|
|
11,468
|
43,488
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
73,933
|
90,632
|
|
|
|
103,435
|
156,094
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
184,768
|
200,217
|
|
(a)
Non-current other financial
assets relate to contributions made for environmental obligations according to Colombian and Brazilian government regulations.
Current other financial assets corresponds to short-term investments with original maturities up to twelve months and over three
months. At 31 December 2017, Current other financial assets also included the security deposit granted in relation to the purchase
of Argentinian assets (Note 35.3).
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
25 Financial instruments by category
(continued)
|
Liabilities as per statement of financial position
|
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
Liabilities at fair value through profit and loss
|
|
|
Derivative financial instrument liabilities
|
-
|
19,289
|
|
-
|
19,289
|
Other financial liabilities at amortized cost
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
69,142
|
52,557
|
Payables to related parties (Note 33)
|
-
|
31,184
|
Payables to LGI (Note 35.1)
|
29,509
|
-
|
To be paid to co-venturers (Note 33)
|
8,449
|
10,015
|
Borrowings
|
447,002
|
426,204
|
|
554,102
|
519,960
|
Total financial liabilities
|
554,102
|
539,249
|
25.1 Credit quality of financial assets
The credit quality of financial assets that
are neither past due nor impaired can be assessed by reference to external credit ratings (if available) or to historical information
about counterparty default rates:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
Counterparties with an external credit rating (Moody’s, S&P, Fitch, BRC Investor Services)
|
|
|
B2
|
1,196
|
70
|
Ba2
|
5,511
|
-
|
Ba3
|
3,734
|
8,788
|
Baa3
|
-
|
3,614
|
Counterparties without an external credit rating
|
|
|
Group1
(a)
|
5,774
|
7,047
|
Total trade receivables
|
16,215
|
19,519
|
(a)
Group 1 – existing customers
(more than 6 months) with no defaults in the past.
All trade receivables are denominated in US
Dollars, except in Brazil where are denominated in Brazilian Real.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
25 Financial instruments by category
(continued)
25.1 Credit quality of financial assets
(continued)
Cash at bank and other financial assets
(a)
|
|
|
|
Amounts in US$ '000
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Counterparties with an external credit rating
(Moody’s,
S&P, Fitch, BRC Investor Services)
|
|
|
|
A1
|
|
1,315
|
553
|
A2
|
|
595
|
298
|
A3
|
|
765
|
63,853
|
Aaa
|
|
-
|
15,040
|
Aaa-mf
|
|
52,563
|
-
|
Aa1
|
|
4,732
|
-
|
Aa3
|
|
17,431
|
11,401
|
AAA
|
|
14,307
|
19,634
|
B2
|
|
-
|
31
|
Ba1
|
|
4,033
|
18
|
Ba2
|
|
1
|
7
|
Baa1
|
|
13,903
|
307
|
Baa1+
|
|
4,138
|
-
|
Baa2
|
|
6,534
|
4,078
|
Ba3
|
|
212
|
2,815
|
B3
|
|
-
|
-
|
BBB
|
|
3,199
|
15,064
|
Counterparties without an external credit rating
|
|
15,448
|
45,123
|
Total
|
|
139,176
|
178,222
|
(a)
The remaining balance sheet
item ‘cash and cash equivalents’ corresponds to cash on hand amounting to US$ 19,000 (US$ 21,000 in 2017).
25.2 Financial liabilities - contractual
undiscounted cash flows
The table below analyses the Group’s
financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the balance sheet to the contractual maturity
date. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows.
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Less than 1 year
|
Between 1 and 2 years
|
Between 2 and 5 years
|
Over 5 years
|
At 31 December 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
39,545
|
38,648
|
82,875
|
452,625
|
Trade payables
|
68,862
|
280
|
-
|
-
|
Payables to LGI (Note 35.1)
|
15,000
|
15,000
|
-
|
-
|
|
123,407
|
53,928
|
82,875
|
452,625
|
At 31 December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
27,625
|
27,625
|
82,875
|
480,250
|
Trade payables
|
52,557
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Payables to related parties
|
7,331
|
2,068
|
27,087
|
-
|
|
87,513
|
29,693
|
109,962
|
480,250
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
25 Financial instruments by category (continued)
25.3 Fair value measurement of financial
instruments
Accounting policies for financial instruments
have been applied to classify as either: loans and receivables, held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or fair value through profit
and loss. For financial instruments that are measured in the statement of financial position at fair value, IFRS 13 requires a
disclosure of fair value measurements by level according to the following fair value measurement hierarchy:
Level 1 - Quoted prices (unadjusted)
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted
prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly
(that is, derived from prices).
Level 3 - Inputs for the asset or
liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs).
This note provides an update on the judgements
and estimates made by the Group in determining the fair values of the financial instruments since the last annual financial report.
25.3.1 Fair value hierarchy
The following table presents the Group’s
financial assets and financial liabilities measured and recognized at fair value at 31 December 2018 and 2017 on a recurring basis:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
At 31 December 2018
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
53,794
|
-
|
53,794
|
Derivative financial instrument liabilities
|
|
|
|
Commodity risk management contracts
|
-
|
27,539
|
27,539
|
Total Assets
|
53,794
|
27,539
|
81,333
|
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
At 31 December
2017
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
44,123
|
-
|
44,123
|
Total Assets
|
44,123
|
-
|
44,123
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instrument liabilities
|
|
|
|
Commodity risk management contracts
|
-
|
19,289
|
19,289
|
Total Liabilities
|
-
|
19,289
|
19,289
|
There were no transfers between Level 2
and 3 during the period.
The Group did not measure any financial assets
or financial liabilities at fair value on a non-recurring basis as at 31 December 2018.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
25 Financial instruments by category (continued)
25.3 Fair value measurement of financial
instruments (continued)
25.3.2 Valuation techniques used to determine
fair values
Specific valuation techniques used to value
financial instruments include:
|
·
|
The use of quoted market prices or dealer
quotes for similar instruments.
|
|
·
|
The mark-to-market fair value of the Group's
outstanding derivative instruments is based on independently provided market rates and determined using standard valuation techniques,
including the impact of counterparty credit risk and are within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
·
|
The fair value of the remaining financial
instruments is determined using discounted cash flow analysis. All of the resulting fair value estimates are included in level
2.
|
25.3.3 Fair values of other financial
instruments (unrecognized)
The Group also has a number of financial
instruments which are not measured at fair value in the balance sheet. For the majority of these instruments, the fair values are
not materially different to their carrying amounts, since the interest receivable/payable is either close to current market rates
or the instruments are short-term in nature.
Borrowings are comprised primarily of fixed
rate debt and variable rate debt with a short-term portion where interest has already been fixed. They are classified under other
financial liabilities and measured at their amortized cost.
The fair value of these financial
instruments at 31 December 2018 amounts to US$ 445,582,000 (US$ 425,118,000 in 2017). The fair values are based on cash flows
discounted using a rate based on the borrowing rate of 6.94% (6.90% in 2017) and are within level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
26 Share capital
Issued share capital
|
2018
|
2017
|
Common stock (amounts in US$ ‘000)
|
60
|
61
|
The share capital is distributed as follows:
|
|
|
Common shares, of nominal US$ 0.001
|
60,483,447
|
60,596,219
|
Total common shares in issue
|
60,483,447
|
60,596,219
|
|
|
|
Authorized share capital
|
|
|
US$ per share
|
0.001
|
0.001
|
|
|
|
Number of common shares (US$ 0.001 each)
|
5,171,949,000
|
5,171,949,000
|
Amount in US$
|
5,171,949
|
5,171,949
|
Details regarding the share capital of the
Company are set out below:
Common shares
As of 31 December 2018, the outstanding
common shares confer the following rights on the holder:
|
·
|
the right to one vote per share;
|
|
·
|
ranking
pari passu
, the right to
any dividend declared and payable on common shares;
|
GeoPark common shares history
|
Date
|
Shares issued (millions)
|
Shares closing (millions)
|
US$(`000)
Closing
|
Shares outstanding at the end of 2016
|
|
|
59.9
|
60
|
Stock awards
|
Jan 2017
|
0.1
|
60.0
|
60
|
Stock awards
|
Dec 2017
|
0.1
|
60.1
|
60
|
Stock awards
|
Dec 2017
|
0.5
|
60.6
|
61
|
Shares outstanding at the end of 2017
|
|
|
60.6
|
61
|
Stock awards
|
Dec 2018
|
0.1
|
60.7
|
61
|
Buyback program
|
Dec 2018
|
(0.2)
|
60.5
|
60
|
Shares outstanding at the end of 2018
|
|
|
60.5
|
60
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
26 Share capital (continued)
Stock Award Program and Other Share Based
Payments
Non-Executive Directors Fees
During 2018, the Company issued 33,145 (70,485
in 2017 and 137,897 in 2016) shares to Non-Executive Directors in accordance with contracts as compensation, generating a share
premium of US$ 449,000 (US$ 257,000 in 2017 and US$ 541,848 in 2016). The amount of shares issued is determined considering
the contractual compensation and the fair value of the shares for each relevant period.
Stock Award Program and Other Share Based
Payments
On 14 December 2017, 490,000 (379,500 in
2016) common shares were allotted to the trustee of the Employee Beneficiary Trust (“EBT”), generating a share premium
of US$ 2,513,000 (US$ 3,940,000 in 2016).
On 13 September 2017, 12,546 (8,333 in 2016)
shares were issued pursuant to a consulting agreement for services rendered to GeoPark Limited generating a share premium of US$
43,000 (US$ 38,000 in 2016).
In January 2017, 82,306 shares were issued
to key management as bonus compensation, generating a share premium of US$ 332,000.
On 8 February 2016, 468,405 shares were
issued to Executive Directors and key management as bonus compensation, generating a share premium of US$ 1,512,000.
Buyback Program
On 20 December 2018, the Company approved
a program to repurchase up to 10% of its shares outstanding or approximately 6,063,000 shares. The repurchase program begun on
21 December 2018 and will expire on 31 December 2019. During 2018, the Company purchased 145,917 common shares for a total amount
of US$ 1,801,000. These transactions had no impact on the Group’s results.
During 2016, the Repurchase Program began
on 6 April 2016 and then was resumed during the year until November 2016, the Company purchased 588,868 common shares for a total
amount of US$ 1,991,000.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
27 Borrowings
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
Outstanding amounts as of 31 December
|
|
|
2024 Notes (a)
|
426,993
|
426,124
|
Banco de Crédito e Inversiones (b)
|
3
|
80
|
Banco Santander (c)
|
20,006
|
-
|
|
447,002
|
426,204
|
Classified as follows:
|
|
|
Current
|
17,975
|
7,664
|
Non-current
|
429,027
|
418,540
|
(a) During September 2017, the Company successfully
placed US$ 425,000,000 Notes which were offered to qualified institutional buyers in accordance with Rule 144A under the United
States Securities Act, and outside the United States to non-U.S. persons in accordance with Regulation S under the United States
Securities Act.
The Notes carry a coupon of 6.50% per annum.
Final maturity of the Notes will be 21 September 2024. The Notes are secured with a guarantee granted by GeoPark Colombia Coöperatie
U.A. and GeoPark Chile S.A.. The debt issuance cost for this transaction amounted to US$ 6,683,000 (debt issuance effective rate:
6.90%). The indenture governing the Notes due 2024 includes incurrence test covenants that provides among other things, that, during
the first two years from the issuance date, the Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio should not exceed 3.5 times and the Adjusted
EBITDA to Interest ratio should exceed 2 times. Failure to comply with the incurrence test covenants does not trigger an event
of default. However, this situation may limit the Company’s capacity to incur additional indebtedness, as specified in the
indenture governing the Notes. Incurrence covenants as opposed to maintenance covenants must be tested by the Company before incurring
additional debt or performing certain corporate actions including but not limited to dividend payments, restricted payments and
others. As of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company is in compliance of all the indenture’s provisions
and covenants.
(b) During February 2016, GeoPark Fell S.p.A.
executed a loan agreement with Banco de Crédito e Inversiones for US$ 186,000 to finance the acquisition of vehicles
for the Chilean operation. The interest rate applicable to this loan is 4.14% per annum. The interest and the principal are paid
on a monthly basis, with the final maturity in February 2019.
(c) During October 2018, GeoPark Brazil
Exploração y Produção de Petróleo e Gás Ltda. executed a loan agreement with Banco Santander
for Brazilian Real 77,640,000 (equivalent to US$ 20,000,000 at the moment of the loan execution) to repay an existing US$-denominated
intercompany loan to GeoPark Latin America Limited - Agencia en Chile. The interest rate applicable to this loan is CDI plus 2.25%
per annum. “CDI” (Interbank certificate of deposit) represents the average rate of all inter-bank overnight transactions
in Brazil. The principal and the interest are paid semi-annually, with final maturity in October 2020. Resulting from this transaction,
the Brazilian subsidiary has significantly reduced its exposure to foreign currency fluctuation, considering that its functional
currency is the Brazilian Real (see Note 3).
As of the date of these Consolidated Financial
Statements, the Group has available credit lines for over US$ 80,000,000.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
28 Provisions and other long-term liabilities
Amounts in US$ ‘000
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
Deferred
Income
|
Other
|
Total
|
At 1 January 2017
|
29,862
|
3,484
|
9,163
|
42,509
|
Addition to provision
|
5,943
|
-
|
2,220
|
8,163
|
Exchange difference
|
134
|
-
|
1,154
|
1,288
|
Foreign currency translation
|
(134)
|
-
|
-
|
(134)
|
Amortization
|
-
|
(657)
|
-
|
(657)
|
Unwinding of discount
|
2,607
|
-
|
172
|
2,779
|
Unused amounts reversed
|
-
|
-
|
(2,535)
|
(2,535)
|
Amounts used during the year
|
(337)
|
(1,375)
|
(3,417)
|
(5,129)
|
At 31 December 2017
|
38,075
|
1,452
|
6,757
|
46,284
|
Addition to provision
|
462
|
-
|
1,039
|
1,501
|
Recovery of abandonment costs
|
(4,817)
|
-
|
(1,099)
|
(5,916)
|
Acquisitions
|
9,738
|
-
|
-
|
9,738
|
Exchange difference
|
1,823
|
-
|
(46)
|
1,777
|
Foreign currency translation
|
(1,648)
|
-
|
-
|
(1,648)
|
Amortization
|
-
|
(1,005)
|
-
|
(1,005)
|
Unwinding of discount
|
3,250
|
-
|
173
|
3,423
|
Unused amounts reversed
|
-
|
-
|
(2,093)
|
(2,093)
|
Amounts used during the year
|
(750)
|
-
|
(124)
|
(874)
|
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale
|
(5,816)
|
-
|
(2,794)
|
(8,610)
|
At 31 December 2018
|
40,317
|
447
|
1,813
|
42,577
|
The provision for asset retirement obligation
relates to the estimation of future disbursements related to the abandonment and decommissioning of oil and gas wells (see Note
4).
Deferred income relates to contributions
received to improve the project economics of the gas wells in Chile. The amortization is in line with the related asset. The amount
used in 2017 corresponds to the deferred income related to the take-or-pay provision associated to gas sales in Brazil.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
29 Trade and other payables
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
V.A.T
|
852
|
1,118
|
Trade payables
|
69,142
|
52,557
|
Payables to related parties (Note 33)
(a)
|
-
|
31,184
|
Payables to LGI (Note 35.1)
|
29,509
|
-
|
Customer advance payments
|
6,300
|
10,000
|
Other short-term advance payments
(b)
|
9,000
|
-
|
Staff costs to be paid
|
12,049
|
9,143
|
Royalties to be paid
|
6,238
|
4,110
|
Taxes and other debts to be paid
|
4,670
|
4,191
|
To be paid to co-venturers (Note 33)
|
8,449
|
10,015
|
|
146,209
|
122,318
|
Classified as follows:
|
|
|
Current
|
131,420
|
96,397
|
Non-current
|
14,789
|
25,921
|
|
(a)
|
The
outstanding amount at 31 December 2017 corresponded to advanced cash call payments granted
by LGI to GeoPark Chile S.A. for financing Chilean operations in TdF’s blocks and
was fully cancelled on 28 November 2018 (see Note 35.1).
|
|
(b)
|
Advance
payment collected in relation with the sale of La Cuerva and Yamu Blocks (see Note 35.2).
|
The average credit period (expressed as
creditor days) during the year ended 31 December 2018 was 83 days (2017: 95 days).
The fair value of these short-term financial
instruments is not individually determined as the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value.
Note
30 Share-based payment
The Group has established different stock
awards programs and other share-based payment plans to incentivize the Directors, senior management and employees, enabling them
to benefit from the increased market capitalization of the Company.
During 2018, GeoPark announced the 2018
Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) to motivate and reward those employees, directors, consultants and advisors of
the Group to perform at the highest level and to further the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. This Plan is
designed as a master plan, with a 10-year term, and embraces all equity incentive programs that the Company decides to implement
throughout such term. The maximum number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan is 5,000,000 Shares.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
30 Share-based payment (continued)
During 2018, the Group approved a share-based
compensation program for approximately 200,000 shares. Main characteristics of the Stock Awards Programs are:
|
·
|
Employees hired since July 2016 are eligible.
|
|
·
|
Exercise price is equal to the nominal
value of shares.
|
|
·
|
Vesting date is 30 June 2019.
|
|
·
|
Each employee could receive up to three
salaries (to be pro-rated between the hiring date and the vesting date divided by 3 years) by achieving the following conditions:
continue to be an employee, the stock market price at the date of vesting should be higher than the share price at the date of
grant and obtain the Group minimum production, adjusted EBITDA and reserves target for the year of vesting.
|
During 2016, the Group approved a share-based
compensation program for 1,619,105 shares. Main characteristics of the Stock Awards Programs are:
|
·
|
All employees are eligible.
|
|
·
|
Exercise price is equal to the nominal
value of shares.
|
|
·
|
Vesting date is 30 June 2019.
|
|
·
|
Each employee could receive up to three
salaries by achieving the following conditions: continue to be an employee, the stock market price at the date of vesting should
be above US$ 3 and obtain the Group minimum production, adjusted EBITDA and reserves target for the year of vesting.
|
Also during 2016, the Group approved a plan
named Value Creation Plan (“VCP”) oriented to Top Management. VCP was subject to certain market conditions, among others,
reaching a stock market price for the Company shares of US$ 4.05 at vesting date. VCP has been classified as an equity-settled
plan. On 2 January 2019, 50% of the shares, representing 1,488,391 shares, were issued since the plan vested. The remaining 50%
will be issued in January 2020, as set up in the plan.
Details of these costs and the characteristics
of the different stock awards programs and other share-based payments are described in the following table and explanations:
Year
of issuance
|
Awards
at the beginning
|
Awards
granted in the year
|
Awards
forfeited
|
Awards
exercised
|
Awards
at year end
|
Charged
to net loss / profit
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
2018
|
-
|
200,000
|
-
|
-
|
200,000
|
1,662
|
-
|
-
|
2016
|
1,587,996
|
-
|
(5,570)
|
-
|
1,582,426
|
866
|
865
|
445
|
2014
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
838
|
821
|
2012
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
855
|
Subtotal
|
1,587,996
|
200,000
|
(5,570)
|
-
|
1,782,426
|
2,528
|
1,703
|
2,121
|
Shares
granted to Non-Executive Directors
|
-
|
33,145
|
-
|
(33,145)
|
-
|
450
|
454
|
400
|
VCP
2016
|
-
|
2,976,781
|
-
|
-
|
2,976,781
|
1,868
|
1,868
|
934
|
Executive
Directors Bonus
|
-
|
104,439
|
-
|
-
|
104,439
|
600
|
-
|
(325)
|
Key
Management Bonus
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
202
|
Stock
awards for service contracts
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
50
|
35
|
|
1,587,996
|
3,314,365
|
(5,570)
|
(33,145)
|
4,863,646
|
5,446
|
4,075
|
3,367
|
The awards that are forfeited correspond
to employees that had left the Group before vesting date.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
31 Interests in Joint operations
The Group has interests in joint operations,
which are engaged in the exploration of hydrocarbons in Chile, Colombia, Brazil and Argentina.
In Colombia, GeoPark is the operator in
Llanos 34. In Chile, GeoPark is the operator in all the blocks. In Argentina, GeoPark used to be the operator in CN-V Block until
October 2018.
The following amounts represent the Group’s
share in the assets, liabilities and results of the joint operations which have been recognized in the Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position and Statement of Income:
Subsidiary
/ Joint operation
|
Interest
|
PP&E
|
Other
Assets
|
Total
Assets
|
Total
Liabilities
|
Net
Assets/ (Liabilities)
|
Revenue
|
Operating
profit (loss)
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colombia
SAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Llanos
34 Block
|
45%
|
174,895
|
3,133
|
178,028
|
(2,296)
|
175,732
|
469,404
|
347,772
|
Llanos
32 Block
|
12.5%
|
2,011
|
-
|
2,011
|
(449)
|
1,562
|
5,764
|
623
|
GeoPark
Magallanes Ltda.
|
Tranquilo
Block
|
50%
|
-
|
55
|
55
|
(428)
|
(373)
|
-
|
(46)
|
GeoPark
TdF S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flamenco
Block
|
50%
|
4,803
|
-
|
4,803
|
(1,173)
|
3,630
|
263
|
(5,647)
|
Campanario
Block
|
50%
|
16,477
|
-
|
16,477
|
(278)
|
16,199
|
40
|
(1,008)
|
Isla
Norte Block
|
60%
|
8,920
|
-
|
8,920
|
(72)
|
8,848
|
7
|
(778)
|
GeoPark Brazil Exploração
y Produção de Petróleo e Gas Ltda.
|
Manati
Field
|
10%
|
25,741
|
6,364
|
32,105
|
(839)
|
31,266
|
30,053
|
17,963
|
POT-T-747
|
70%
|
202
|
-
|
202
|
-
|
202
|
-
|
-
|
REC-T-128
|
70%
|
1,398
|
-
|
1,398
|
(648)
|
750
|
-
|
-
|
GeoPark
Argentina Limited – Argentinean Branch
|
CN-V
Block
|
50%
|
8,577
|
328
|
8,905
|
(577)
|
8,328
|
-
|
(922)
|
Puelen
Block
|
18%
|
1,881
|
13
|
1,894
|
(246)
|
1,648
|
-
|
(159)
|
Sierra
del Nevado Block
|
18%
|
995
|
10
|
1,005
|
(91)
|
914
|
-
|
(134)
|
GeoPark
Perú S.A.C.
|
Morona
|
75%
|
6,446
|
-
|
6,446
|
(7,016)
|
(570)
|
-
|
-
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
31 Interests in Joint operations (continued)
Subsidiary
/
Joint
operation
|
Interest
|
PP&E
|
Other
Assets
|
Total
Assets
|
Total
Liabilities
|
Net
Assets/ (Liabilities)
|
Revenue
|
Operating
profit (loss)
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colombia
SAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Llanos
34 Block
|
45%
|
131,193
|
4,563
|
135,756
|
(5,847)
|
129,909
|
259,815
|
163,917
|
Llanos
32 Block
|
12.5%
|
835
|
209
|
1,044
|
(492)
|
552
|
1,784
|
(319)
|
Yamu/Carupana
Block
|
89.5%
|
4,741
|
1
|
4,742
|
(2,993)
|
1,749
|
3,072
|
(2,721)
|
GeoPark
Magallanes Ltda.
|
Tranquilo
Block
|
50%
|
-
|
55
|
55
|
(432)
|
(377)
|
-
|
(48)
|
GeoPark
TdF S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flamenco
Block
|
50%
|
9,893
|
-
|
9,893
|
(1,223)
|
8,670
|
879
|
(1,422)
|
Campanario
Block
|
50%
|
17,347
|
-
|
17,347
|
(233)
|
17,114
|
-
|
(150)
|
Isla
Norte Block
|
60%
|
9,553
|
-
|
9,553
|
(60)
|
9,493
|
-
|
(161)
|
GeoPark
Brazil Exploração y Produção de Petróleo e Gas Ltda.
|
Manati
Field
|
10%
|
44,167
|
19,126
|
63,293
|
(11,444)
|
51,849
|
34,238
|
12,731
|
POT-T-747
|
70%
|
849
|
358
|
1,207
|
(1,091)
|
116
|
-
|
-
|
GeoPark
Argentina Limited – Argentinean Branch
|
CN-V
Block
|
50%
|
6,819
|
347
|
7,166
|
(984)
|
6,182
|
70
|
(1,163)
|
Puelen
Block
|
18%
|
1,318
|
72
|
1,390
|
(232)
|
1,158
|
-
|
(546)
|
Sierra
del Nevado Block
|
18%
|
568
|
169
|
737
|
(837)
|
(100)
|
-
|
(474)
|
Subsidiary
/
Joint
operation
|
Interest
|
PP&E
|
Other
Assets
|
Total
Assets
|
Total
Liabilities
|
Net
Assets/ (Liabilities)
|
Revenue
|
Operating
profit (loss)
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colombia
SAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Llanos
34 Block
|
45%
|
79,811
|
693
|
80,504
|
(3,943)
|
76,561
|
125,400
|
83,193
|
Llanos
32 Block
|
10%
|
3,819
|
-
|
3,819
|
(211)
|
3,608
|
2,303
|
1,043
|
Yamu/Carupana
Block
|
89.5%
|
3,418
|
-
|
3,418
|
(2,289)
|
1,129
|
18
|
(307)
|
GeoPark
Magallanes Ltda.
|
Tranquilo
Block
|
50%
|
-
|
55
|
55
|
(424)
|
(369)
|
-
|
(40)
|
GeoPark
TdF S.A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flamenco
Block
|
50%
|
15,108
|
-
|
15,108
|
(93)
|
15,015
|
1,004
|
(1,988)
|
Campanario
Block
|
50%
|
29,718
|
-
|
29,718
|
(1)
|
29,717
|
-
|
(399)
|
Isla
Norte Block
|
60%
|
9,920
|
-
|
9,920
|
(1)
|
9,919
|
5
|
(438)
|
GeoPark
Brazil Exploração y Produção de Petróleo e Gas Ltda.
|
Manati
Field
|
10%
|
54,166
|
15,791
|
69,957
|
(8,442)
|
61,515
|
29,719
|
20,945
|
Capital commitments are disclosed in Note 32.2.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
32 Commitments
32.1 Royalty commitments
In Colombia, royalties on production are
payable to the Colombian Government and are determined on a field-by-field basis using a level of production sliding scale at a
rate which ranges between 6%-8%. The Colombian National Hydrocarbons Agency (“ANH”) also has an additional economic
right equivalent to 1% of production, net of royalties.
Under Law 756 of 2002, as modified by Law
1530 of 2012, the royalties on Colombian production of light and medium oil are calculated on a field-by-field basis, using the
following sliding scale:
Average daily production in barrels
|
Production Royalty rate
|
Up to 5,000
|
8%
|
5,000 to 125,000
|
8% + (production - 5,000) * 0.1
|
125,000 to 400,000
|
20%
|
400,000 to 600,000
|
20% + (production - 400,000) * 0.025
|
Greater than 600,000
|
25%
|
When the API is lower than 15°, the
payment is reduced to the 75% of the total calculation.
In accordance with Llanos 34 Block operation
contract, when the accumulated production of each field, including the royalties’ volume, exceeds 5,000,000 of barrels and
the WTI exceeds the base price settled in table A, the Group should deliver to ANH a share of the production net of royalties in
accordance with the following formula: Q = ((P – Po) / P) x S; where Q = Economic right to be delivered to ANH, P = WTI,
Po = Base price (see table A) and S = Share (see table B).
Table A
|
|
Table B
|
°API
|
Po (US$/barrel)
|
WTI (P)
|
|
S
|
>29°
|
30.22
|
Po < P < 2Po
|
|
30%
|
>22°<29°
|
31.39
|
2Po < P < 3Po
|
|
35%
|
>15°<22°
|
32.56
|
3Po < P < 4Po
|
|
40%
|
>10°<15°
|
46.50
|
4Po < P < 5Po
|
|
45%
|
|
|
5Po < P
|
|
50%
|
Additionally, under the terms of the Winchester
Stock Purchase Agreement, GeoPark is obligated to make certain payments to the previous owners of Winchester based on the production
and sale of hydrocarbons discovered by exploration wells drilled after 25 October 2011. These payments involve an overriding
royalty equal to an estimated 4% carried interest on the part of the vendor. As at the balance sheet date and based on preliminary
internal estimates of additions of 2P reserves since acquisition, the Group’s best estimate of the total commitment over
the remaining life of the concession is in a range between US$ 150,000,000 and US$ 160,000,000. During 2018, the Group has accrued
US$ 20,551,000 (US$ 11,369,000 in 2017 and US$ 5,414,000 in 2016) and paid US$ 19,128,000 (US$ 9,981,000 in 2017 and
US$ 3,772,000 in 2016).
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
32 Commitments (continued)
32.1 Royalty commitments (continued)
In Chile, royalties are payable to the Chilean
Government. In the Fell Block, royalties are calculated at 5% of crude oil production and 3% of gas production. In the Flamenco
Block, Campanario Block and Isla Norte Block, royalties are calculated at 5% of gas and oil production.
In Brazil, the Brazilian National Petroleum,
Natural Gas and Biofuels Agency (ANP) is responsible for determining monthly minimum prices for petroleum produced in concessions
for purposes of royalties payable with respect to production. Royalties generally correspond to a percentage ranging between 5%
and 10% applied to reference prices for oil or natural gas, as established in the relevant bidding guidelines (edital de licitação)
and concession agreement. In determining the percentage of royalties applicable to a concession, the ANP takes into consideration,
among other factors, the geological risks involved and the production levels expected. In the Manati Block, royalties are calculated
at 7.5% of gas production.
In Argentina, crude oil and gas production
accrues royalties payable to the Provinces of Mendoza and Neuquen equivalent to 15% on estimated value at well head of those products.
This value is equivalent to final sales price less transport, storage and treatment costs.
32.2 Capital commitments
32.2.1 Colombia
The VIM 3 Block minimum investment program
consists of 200 km of 2D seismic and drilling one exploratory well, with a total estimated investment of US$ 22,290,800 during
the initial three-year exploratory period ending 2 September 2018. On 12 September 2018, the Colombian National Hydrocarbons Agency
(“ANH”) accepted GeoPark’s proposal to extend the first exploratory phase for an additional period ending 12
May 2019. Additionally, GeoPark requested ANH to terminate the E&P Contract due to environmental restrictions in the block.
These restrictions became apparent once the National Authority of Environmental Licenses (ANLA) issued the environmental license.
As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, GeoPark’s termination request is under review.
The Llanos 34 Block (45% working interest)
has committed to drill an exploratory well, which amounts to US$ 1,935,000 at GeoPark’s working interest, before 19 September
2019.
32.2.2 Chile
The remaining investment commitment for
the second exploratory phase in the Flamenco Block relates to the drilling of one exploratory well to be assumed 100% by GeoPark
and amounts to US$ 2,100,000. On 30 June 2017, the Chilean Ministry accepted GeoPark’s proposal to extend the second exploratory
phase for an additional period of 18 months, ending on 7 May 2019. On 20 December 2018, GeoPark proposed to extend the second exploratory
period for an additional period of 18 months, ending 7 November 2020. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements
the Chilean Ministry has not replied.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
32 Commitments (continued)
32.2 Capital commitments (continued)
32.2.2 Chile (continued)
The investment commitment for the first
exploratory period in the Campanario and Isla Norte Blocks has already been fulfilled. The investments to be made in the second
exploratory period will be assumed 100% by GeoPark. On 29 May 2017, the Chilean Ministry accepted GeoPark’s proposal to update
the value of the commitments in both the Campanario and Isla Norte Blocks as well as the guarantees related to those commitments.
Consequently, the future investment commitments assumed by GeoPark for the second exploratory period are up to:
|
·
|
Campanario Block: 3 exploratory wells before
10 July 2019 (US$ 4,758,000)
|
|
·
|
Isla Norte Block: 2 exploratory wells before
7 May 2019 (US$ 2,855,000)
|
As of 31 December 2018, the Group has established
guarantees for its total commitments.
On 20 December 2018, GeoPark proposed to
extend the second exploratory period for an additional period of 18 months, ending 11 January 2021 and 7 November 2020, respectively.
As of the date of these consolidated financial statements the Chilean Ministry has not replied.
32.2.4 Brazil
The future investment commitments assumed
by GeoPark are up to:
|
·
|
REC-T-94 Block: 1 exploratory well before
7 February 2020 (US$ 930,000).
|
|
·
|
REC-T-128 Block: 1 exploratory well before
20 December 2018 (US$ 2,200,000). As of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements, GeoPark has already drilled the committed
well, with testing expected for the first quarter of 2019.
|
|
·
|
POT-T-747 Block: 1 exploratory well before
20 December 2018 (US$ 490,000). On 15 January 2019, the Brazilian National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (“ANP”)
notified the suspension of the exploratory period to fulfil the commitments in the block.
|
|
·
|
POT-T-785 Block: 3D seismic and electromagnetic
survey before 29 January 2023 (US$ 90,000).
|
32.2.5 Argentina
The remaining commitment in the Sierra del
Nevado Block (18% working interest) for the first exploratory period, ending on 20 August 2019, amounts to between US$ 500,000
and US$ 1,000,000 at GeoPark’s working interest
The investment commitment in the CN-V Block
(50% working interest) for the current exploratory period denominated as “Field under evaluation”, ending on 27 November
2021, amounts to US$ 1,300,000 at GeoPark’s working interest.
The investment commitment in the Los Parlamentos
Block (50% working interest) for the first exploratory period, ending on 30 October 2021, which includes 2 exploratory wells and
additional 3D seismic, amounts to US$ 6,000,000, at GeoPark’s working interest.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
32 Commitments (continued)
32.3 Operating lease commitments –
Group company as lessee (continued)
The Group leases various plant and machinery
under non-cancellable operating lease agreements. The Group also leases offices under non-cancellable operating lease agreements.
The lease terms are between 2 and 3 years, and most of lease agreements are renewable at the end of the lease period at market
rate.
During 2018 a total amount of US$ 12,485,000
(US$ 46,195,000 in 2017 and US$ 47,871,000 in 2016) was charged to the income statement and US$ 38,229,000 of operating leases
were capitalized as Property, plant and equipment related to rental of drilling equipment and machinery (US$ 34,160,000 in 2017
and US$ 32,058,000 in 2016).
The future aggregate minimum lease payments
under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:
Amounts in US$ ’000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Falling due within 1 year
|
47,450
|
32,180
|
67,752
|
Falling due within 1 – 3 years
|
18,032
|
5,777
|
14,031
|
Falling due within 3 – 5 years
|
2,500
|
2,793
|
5,066
|
Falling due over 5 years
|
1,956
|
-
|
114
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
69,938
|
40,750
|
86,963
|
Note
33 Related parties
Controlling interest
The main shareholders of GeoPark Limited,
a company registered in Bermuda, as of 31 December 2018, are:
Shareholder
|
Common shares
|
Percentage of outstanding common shares
|
James F. Park
(a)
|
7,891,269
|
13.05%
|
Gerald E. O’Shaughnessy
(b)
|
6,943,316
|
11.48%
|
Manchester Financial Group, LP
|
5,246,296
|
8.67%
|
Compass Group LLC
(c)
|
3,899,301
|
6.45%
|
Renaissance Technologies Holdings Corporation
(d)
|
3,527,000
|
5.83%
|
Juan Cristóbal Pavez
(e)
|
2,969,116
|
4.91%
|
Other shareholders
|
30,007,149
|
49.61%
|
|
60,483,447
|
100.00%
|
(a)
Held by Energy Holdings, LLC, which is controlled by James F. Park. The number of common shares held by Mr. Park does not reflect
the 1,533,927 common shares held as of 31 December 2018 in the Company´s employee benefit trust and to which Mr. Park has
voting power. The information set forth above and listed in the table is based solely on the disclosure set forth in Mr. Park’s
most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on 13 February 2019.
(b)
Held by Mr. O’Shaughnessy directly and indirectly through GP Investments LLP, GPK Holdings, The Globe Resources Group, Inc.,
and other investment vehicles. The information set forth above and listed in the table is based solely on the disclosure set forth
in Mr. O´Shaughnessy’s most recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on 13 February 2019.
(c)
The information set forth above and listed in the table is based solely on the disclosure set forth in Compass Group LLC’s
most recent Schedule 13F filed with the SEC on 6 February 2019.
(d)
Beneficially owned by Renaissance Technologies Holdings Corporation and Renaissance Technologies LLC (jointly “Renaissance”).
The information set forth above and listed in the table is based solely on the disclosure set forth in Renaissance’s most
recent Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on 12 February 2019.
(e)
Held through Socoservin Overseas Ltd, which is controlled by Juan Cristóbal Pavez. The common shares reflected as being
held by Mr. Pavez include 91,312 common shares held by him personally.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
33 Related parties (continued)
Balances outstanding and transactions
with related parties
Account (Amounts in ´000)
|
Transaction in the year
|
Balances at year end
|
Related Party
|
Relationship
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
To be recovered from co-venturers
|
-
|
1,819
|
Joint Operations
|
Joint Operations
|
To be paid to co-venturers
|
-
|
(8,449)
|
Joint Operations
|
Joint Operations
|
Financial results
|
1,606
|
-
|
LGI
|
Partner
|
Geological and geophysical expenses
|
170
|
-
|
Carlos Gulisano
|
Non-Executive Director
(a)
|
Administrative expenses
|
547
|
-
|
Pedro E. Aylwin
|
Executive Director
(b)
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
To be recovered from co-venturers
|
-
|
2,455
|
Joint Operations
|
Joint Operations
|
Prepayments and other receivables
|
-
|
56
|
LGI
|
Partner
|
Payables account
|
-
|
(31,184)
|
LGI
|
Partner
|
To be paid to co-venturers
|
-
|
(10,015)
|
Joint Operations
|
Joint Operations
|
Financial results
|
2,224
|
-
|
LGI
|
Partner
|
Geological and geophysical expenses
|
170
|
-
|
Carlos Gulisano
|
Non-Executive Director
(a)
|
Administrative expenses
|
411
|
-
|
Pedro E. Aylwin
|
Executive Director
(b)
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
To be recovered from co-venturers
|
-
|
3,311
|
Joint Operations
|
Joint Operations
|
Prepayments and other receivables
|
-
|
42
|
LGI
|
Partner
|
Payables account
|
-
|
(27,801)
|
LGI
|
Partner
|
To be paid to co-venturers
|
-
|
(1,614)
|
Joint Operations
|
Joint Operations
|
Financial results
|
1,587
|
-
|
LGI
|
Partner
|
Geological and geophysical expenses
|
113
|
-
|
Carlos Gulisano
|
Non-Executive Director
(a)
|
Administrative expenses
|
371
|
-
|
Pedro E. Aylwin
|
Executive Director
(b)
|
(a)
Corresponding to consultancy
services.
(b)
Corresponding to wages and
salaries for US$ 417,000 (US$ 271,000 in 2017 and US$ 246,000 in 2016) and bonus for US$ 130,000 (US$ 140,000 in 2017 and US$ 125,000
in 2016).
There have been no other transactions with
the Board of Directors, Executive officers, significant shareholders or other related parties during the year besides the intercompany
transactions which have been eliminated in the Consolidated Financial Statements, the normal remuneration of Board of Directors
and other benefits informed in Note 11.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
34 Fees paid to Auditors
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Audit fees
|
797
|
726
|
487
|
Audit related fees
|
-
|
137
|
-
|
Tax services fees
|
209
|
212
|
134
|
Non-audit services fees
|
-
|
39
|
-
|
Fees paid to auditors
|
1,006
|
1,114
|
621
|
Non-audit services fees relate to consultancy
and other services for 2017.
Note
35 Business transactions
35.1 General
Acquisition of Non-controlling interest
in Colombia and Chile’s business from LG International
On 28 November 2018, GeoPark executed an
agreement to acquire the LG International Corporation (“LGI”) interest in GeoPark’s Colombian and Chilean operations
and subsidiaries.
The acquisition price includes a fixed payment
of US$ 81,000,000 paid at closing, plus two equal installments of US$ 15,000,000 each, to be paid in June 2019 and June 2020. Additionally,
three contingent payments of US$ 5,000,000 each could be payable over the next three years, subject to certain production thresholds
being exceeded.
Through this transaction, GeoPark acquired
the shares that used to be held by LGI representing 20% equity interest in GeoPark Colombia Coöperatie U.A., 20% equity interest
in GeoPark Chile S.A. and 14% equity interest in GeoPark TdF S.A. In addition to that, the outstanding amount corresponding to
advanced cash call payments granted in the past by LGI to GeoPark Chile S.A. for financing Chilean operations in TdF’s blocks
were considered as part of the transaction.
The transaction mentioned above has been
accounted for as a transaction with non-controlling interest in accordance with IFRS 10. Consequently, the difference between the
amount by which the non-controlling interest was stated and the fair value of the consideration paid was recognized directly in
Equity and attributed to the owners of the Company.
The following table summarizes the result
of this transaction:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Total
|
Cash
|
81,000
|
Additional installments to be paid
|
29,427
|
Total consideration
|
110,427
|
Equity attributable to non-controlling interest
|
64,245
|
Trade and other payables
|
32,786
|
Total book value of the transaction
|
97,031
|
Result of the transaction recognized in Equity
|
13,396
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
35 Business transactions (continued)
35.2 Colombia
Sale of La Cuerva and Yamu Blocks
On 2 November 2018, GeoPark executed a purchase
and sale agreement to sell its 100% working interest in the La Cuerva and Yamu Blocks, in Colombia. The total consideration is
US$ 18,000,000, plus a contingent payment of US$ 2,000,000 (depending on the oil price performance) and subject to working capital
adjustments. As of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements, GeoPark has collected an advance payment of US$ 9,000,000.
Closing of the transaction is subject to customary regulatory approvals, which are expected to occur during 2019.
The following table summarizes the book
value of the assets and liabilities related to these blocks as of 31 December 2018:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Total
|
Property, plant and equipment
(a)
|
15,530
|
Inventories
|
1,033
|
Other assets
(a)
|
7,756
|
Provision for other long-term liabilities
(b)
|
(8,610)
|
Other liabilities
(b)
|
(1,664)
|
Total identifiable net assets
|
14,045
|
|
(a)
|
Classified
as “Assets held for sale”.
|
|
(b)
|
Classified
as “Liabilities associated with assets held for sale”.
|
Zamuro Farm-in agreement
GeoPark executed a farm-in agreement to
drill the Zamuro exploration prospect, which is located in the Llanos 32 Block (GeoPark non-operated, 12.5% WI). The farm-in agreement
provided for the drilling of an exploration well to be funded by GeoPark and, in the event of a commercial discovery, GeoPark would
increase its economic interest to 56.25% in the Zamuro field area. The well was spudded with unsuccessful results during 2018.
Acquisition of Tiple Block
GeoPark executed a joint operation agreement
related to certain exploration activities in an exploration acreage (“Tiple Block Acreage”) in the Llanos Basin in
Colombia, through a partnership with CEPSA Colombia S.A. (a subsidiary of CEPSA SAU, the Spanish integrated energy and petrochemical
company). The agreement provided for GeoPark to drill one exploration well, which was spudded with unsuccessful results during
2018.
Incremental interest in Llanos 32 Block
On 22 August 2017, GeoPark acquired an additional
2.5% interest in the Llanos 32 Block. No gain or loss has been generated by this transaction.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
35
Business transactions (continued)
35.3 Argentina
Acquisition of the Aguada Baguales, El
Porvenir and Puesto Touquet Blocks
On 27 March 2018, GeoPark acquired a 100%
working interest and operatorship of the Aguada Baguales, El Porvenir and Puesto Touquet Blocks, which are located in the Neuquen
Basin, for a total consideration of US$ 52,000,000, less a working capital adjustment of US$ 3,150,000. The Group has estimated
that there are no any future contingent payments at the acquisition date and as of the date of these consolidated financial statements
either.
In accordance with the acquisition method
of accounting, the acquisition cost was allocated to the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed based primarily upon
their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. An income approach (being the net present value of expected future cash
flows) was adopted to determine the fair values of the mineral interest. Estimates of expected future cash flows reflect estimates
of projected future revenues, production costs and capital expenditures based on our business model.
The following table summarizes the combined
consideration paid for the acquired blocks and the final allocation of fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
for the abovementioned transaction:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Total
|
Cash
(a)
|
48,850
|
Total consideration
|
48,850
|
Property, plant and equipment (including mineral interest)
|
54,929
|
Inventories
|
3,659
|
Provision for other long-term liabilities
|
(9,738)
|
Total identifiable net assets
|
48,850
|
|
(a)
|
In December 2017, GeoPark granted a security deposit of US$ 15,600,000. In March 2018, the Group
completed the total consideration with an additional payment of US$ 36,400,000. In September 2018, Geo-Park
collected a working capital adjustment of US$ 3,150,000.
|
In accordance with disclosure requirements
for business combinations, the Group has calculated its consolidated revenue and profit, considering as if the mentioned acquisition
had occurred at the beginning of the reporting period.
The following table summarizes both results:
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
Revenue
|
612,401
|
Profit for the period
|
102,873
|
The revenue included in the consolidated
statement of comprehensive income since acquisition date contributed by the acquired business is US$ 35,879,000. The acquired business
has also contributed profit of US$ 124,000 over the same period.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
35 Business transactions (continued)
35.3 Argentina (continued)
Acquisition of the Aguada Baguales, El
Porvenir and Puesto Touquet Blocks (continued)
As a consequence of this transaction, the
Group considers that there is sufficient evidence of future taxable profits to offset tax losses and recognize a deferred tax asset
for US$ 1,346,000 in respect of tax losses from previous years which can be utilised against future taxable profit.
Los Parlamentos Block
In June 2018, GeoPark acquired a 50% working
interest in the Los Parlamentos exploratory block in partnership with YPF S.A. (YPF), the largest oil and gas producer in Argentina.
In accordance with the partnership agreement, YPF assumed the operationship of the block and GeoPark assumed a commitment to fund
its 50% working interest of one exploratory well and additional 3D seismic, which amounts to US$ 6,000,000 at GeoPark’s working
interest, over the next three years.
35.4 Peru
Entry in Peru
The Group has executed a Joint Investment
Agreement and Joint Operating Agreement with Petróleos del Peru S.A. (“Petroperu”) to acquire an interest in
and operate the Morona Block located in northern Peru. GeoPark will assume a 75% working interest (“WI”) of the Morona
Block, with Petroperu retaining a 25% WI. The transaction has been approved by the Board of Directors of both Petroperu and GeoPark.
The agreement was subject to Peru regulatory approval, which was completed on 1 December 2016 following the issuance of Supreme
Decree 031-2016-MEM.
The Morona Block, also known as Lote 64,
covers an area of 1.9 million acres on the western side of the Marañón Basin, one of the most prolific hydrocarbon
basins in Peru. It contains the Situche Central oil field, which has been delineated by two wells (with short-term tests of approximately
2,400 and 5,200 bopd of 35-36° API oil each) and by 3D seismic.
In accordance with the terms of the agreement,
GeoPark has committed to carry Petroperu on a work program that provides for testing and start-up production of one of the existing
wells in the field, subject to certain technical and economic conditions being met. During 2017, GeoPark recognized an initial
consideration owed to Petroperu of US$ 10,684,000. In 2018, after GeoPark’s review and approval of supporting documentation,
the consideration was reduced in US$ 806,000, resulting in a total amount of US$ 9,878,000. This amount will be offset by the Petroperu’s
interest in the operation expenses to be incurred by GeoPark in the block. Expected capital expenditures in 2019 for the Morona
Block are mainly related to flexible pipeline installation, temporary access road, location conditioning and Morona Camp dock revamping.
These activities are subject to the approval of the Environmental Impact Study, which is under review by the local authority as
of the date of these consolidated financial statements.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
36 Impairment test on Property, plant and
equipment
As a result of the oil price crisis which
started in the second half of 2014, the Group recognized an impairment loss of US$ 149,574,000 in 2015 after evaluating the
recoverability of its fixed assets affected by oil price drop, as such situation constitutes an impairment indicator according
to IAS 36 and, consequently, it triggers the need of assessing the fair value of the assets involved against their carrying amount.
The Management of the Group considers as
Cash Generating Unit (CGU) each of the blocks in which the Group has working or economic interests. The blocks with no material
investment on fixed assets or with operations that are not linked to oil prices were not subject to the impairment test.
During 2016, 2017 and 2018 the impairment
tests were reviewed. The main assumptions taken into account for the impairment tests for the blocks below mentioned were:
|
-
|
The future oil prices have been calculated taking into consideration the oil price curves available
in the market, provided by international advisory companies, weighted through internal estimations in accordance with price curves
used by D&M;
|
|
-
|
Three oil price scenarios were projected and weighted in order to minimize misleading estimations:
low-price, middle-price and high-price (see below table “Oil price scenarios”);
|
|
-
|
The table “Oil price scenarios” was based on Brent future price estimations; the Group
adjusted this marker price on its model valuation to reflect the effective price applicable in each location (see Note 3 “Price
risk”);
|
|
-
|
The model valuation was based on the expected cash flow approach;
|
|
-
|
The revenues were calculated linking price curves with levels of production according to certified
reserves (see below table “Oil price scenarios”);
|
|
-
|
The levels of production have been linked to certified risked 1P, 2P and 3P reserves (see Note
4);
|
|
-
|
Production and structure costs were estimated considering internal historical data according to
GeoPark’s own records and aligned to the 2019 approved budget;
|
|
-
|
The capital expenditures were estimated considering the drilling campaign necessary to develop
the certified reserves;
|
|
-
|
The assets subject to impairment test are the ones classified as Oil and Gas properties and Production
facilities and machinery;
|
|
-
|
The carrying amount subject to impairment test includes mineral interest, if any;
|
|
-
|
The income tax charges have considered future changes in the applicable income tax rates (see Note
16).
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
36 Impairment test on Property, plant and
equipment (continued)
Table Oil price scenarios
(a)
:
|
Amounts in US$ per Bbl.
|
Year
|
Low price (15%)
|
Middle price (60%)
|
High price (25%)
|
Weighted market price used for the impairment test
|
2019
|
63.9
|
63.9
|
63.9
|
63.9
|
2020
|
51.2
|
68.2
|
75.0
|
67.3
|
2021
|
53.3
|
71.0
|
78.1
|
70.1
|
Over 2022
|
55.1
|
73.4
|
80.7
|
72.5
|
(a)
The percentages indicated
between brackets represent the Group estimation regarding each price scenario.
As a consequence of the evaluation, the
following amounts of impairment loss were reversed (recognized):
Amounts in US$ '000
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Colombia
(a)
|
11,531
|
-
|
5,664
|
Chile
(b)
|
(6,549)
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
4,982
|
-
|
5,664
|
|
(a)
|
Reversal of impairment losses due to increases in estimated market prices and improvements in cost
structure, and also the known fair value less costs of disposal of the La Cuerva and Yamu Blocks (see Note 35.2).
|
|
(b)
|
Recognition of impairment loss due to the termination of the sales agreement for the TdF’s
blocks, with no renovation in place as of the date of these consolidated financial statements.
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
37 Supplemental information on oil and
gas activities (unaudited)
The following information is presented in
accordance with ASC No. 932 “Extractive Activities - Oil and Gas”, as amended by ASU 2010 - 03 “Oil and Gas Reserves.
Estimation and Disclosures”, issued by FASB in January 2010 in order to align the current estimation and disclosure requirements
with the requirements set in the SEC final rules and interpretations, published on 31 December 2008. This information includes
the Group’s oil and gas production activities carried out in Colombia, Chile, Brazil, Argentina and Peru.
Table 1 - Costs incurred in exploration,
property acquisitions and development
(a)
The following table presents those costs
capitalized as well as expensed that were incurred during each of the years ended as of 31 December 2018, 2017 and 2016. The acquisition
of properties includes the cost of acquisition of proved or unproved oil and gas properties. Exploration costs include geological
and geophysical costs, costs necessary for retaining undeveloped properties, drilling costs and exploratory wells equipment. Development
costs include drilling costs and equipment for developmental wells, the construction of facilities for extraction, treatment and
storage of hydrocarbons and all necessary costs to maintain facilities for the existing developed reserves.
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Peru
|
Total
|
Year ended 31 December 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
54,541
|
-
|
54,541
|
Unproved
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total property acquisition
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
54,541
|
-
|
54,541
|
Exploration
|
34,242
|
6,221
|
3,217
|
9,383
|
1,269
|
54,332
|
Development
|
65,174
|
3,033
|
(2,220)
|
1,836
|
8,385
|
76,208
|
Total costs incurred
|
99,416
|
9,254
|
997
|
11,219
|
9,654
|
130,540
|
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Peru
|
Total
|
Year ended 31 December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Unproved
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total property acquisition
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exploration
|
37,017
|
3,283
|
5,207
|
8,080
|
743
|
54,330
|
Development
|
49,268
|
10,231
|
1,210
|
167
|
14,074
|
74,950
|
Total costs incurred
|
86,285
|
13,514
|
6,417
|
8,247
|
14,817
|
129,280
|
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Peru
|
Total
|
Year ended 31 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Unproved
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total property acquisition
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exploration
|
15,233
|
5,519
|
2,555
|
1,894
|
-
|
25,201
|
Development
|
12,500
|
4,566
|
191
|
-
|
-
|
17,257
|
Total costs incurred
|
27,733
|
10,085
|
2,746
|
1,894
|
-
|
42,458
|
(a)
Includes
capitalized amounts related to asset retirement obligations.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
37 Supplemental information on oil and
gas activities (unaudited – continued)
Table 2 - Capitalized costs related to oil
and gas producing activities
The following table presents the capitalized
costs as at 31 December 2018, 2017 and 2016, for proved and unproved oil and gas properties, and the related accumulated depreciation
as of those dates.
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Total
|
At 31 December 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment, camps and other facilities
|
83,023
|
81,459
|
5,154
|
2,458
|
172,094
|
Mineral interest and wells
|
189,514
|
400,338
|
63,574
|
64,084
|
717,510
|
Other uncompleted projects
(b)
|
24,061
|
12,233
|
-
|
1,836
|
38,130
|
Unproved properties
|
1,676
|
41,162
|
7,073
|
10,081
|
59,992
|
Gross capitalized costs
|
298,274
|
535,192
|
75,801
|
78,459
|
987,726
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
(122,479)
|
(281,062)
|
(43,158)
|
(16,363)
|
(463,062)
|
Total net capitalized costs
|
175,795
|
254,130
|
32,643
|
62,096
|
524,664
|
|
(a)
|
Includes capitalized amounts related to asset retirement obligations, impairment loss in Chile
for US$ 6,549,000 and impairment loss reversal in Colombia for US$ 11,531,000.
|
|
(b)
|
Do not include Peru capitalized costs.
|
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Total
|
At 31 December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment, camps and other facilities
|
69,906
|
80,611
|
6,036
|
843
|
157,396
|
Mineral interest and wells
|
291,050
|
397,031
|
77,264
|
11,159
|
776,504
|
Other uncompleted projects
(b)
|
11,290
|
12,508
|
70
|
48
|
23,916
|
Unproved properties
|
4,106
|
49,702
|
7,585
|
2,975
|
64,368
|
Gross capitalized costs
|
376,352
|
539,852
|
90,955
|
15,025
|
1,022,184
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
(228,793)
|
(253,764)
|
(39,509)
|
(5,700)
|
(527,766)
|
Total net capitalized costs
|
147,559
|
286,088
|
51,446
|
9,325
|
494,418
|
|
(a)
|
Includes capitalized amounts related to asset retirement obligations.
|
|
(b)
|
Do not include Peru capitalized costs.
|
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Total
|
At 31 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment, camps and other facilities
|
46,785
|
80,611
|
4,174
|
843
|
132,413
|
Mineral interest and wells
|
230,100
|
380,037
|
77,255
|
4,849
|
692,241
|
Other uncompleted projects
|
12,534
|
18,274
|
2,082
|
36
|
32,926
|
Unproved properties
|
4,503
|
48,908
|
6,468
|
1,894
|
61,773
|
Gross capitalized costs
|
293,922
|
527,830
|
89,979
|
7,622
|
919,353
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
(190,025)
|
(230,917)
|
(29,803)
|
(5,692)
|
(456,437)
|
Total net capitalized costs
|
103,897
|
296,913
|
60,176
|
1,930
|
462,916
|
|
(a)
|
Includes capitalized amounts related to asset retirement obligations and impairment loss reversal
in Colombia for US$ 5,664,000.
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
37 Supplemental information on oil and
gas activities (unaudited – continued)
Table 3 - Results of operations for oil
and gas producing activities
The breakdown of results of the operations
shown below summarizes revenues and expenses directly associated with oil and gas producing activities for the years ended 31 December
2018, 2017 and 2016. Income tax for the years presented was calculated utilizing the statutory tax rates.
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Total
|
Year ended 31 December 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
497,870
|
37,359
|
30,053
|
35,879
|
601,161
|
Production costs, excluding depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs
|
(55,823)
|
(20,426)
|
(5,965)
|
(20,210)
|
(102,424)
|
Royalties
|
(62,710)
|
(1,473)
|
(2,820)
|
(4,833)
|
(71,836)
|
Total production costs
|
(118,533)
|
(21,899)
|
(8,785)
|
(25,043)
|
(174,260)
|
Exploration expenses
(a)
|
(23,953)
|
(6,855)
|
(2,846)
|
(2,277)
|
(35,931)
|
Accretion expense
(b)
|
(892)
|
(1,105)
|
(918)
|
(508)
|
(3,423)
|
Impairment loss reversal for non-financial assets
|
11,531
|
(6,549)
|
-
|
-
|
4,982
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
(41,850)
|
(27,298)
|
(10,278)
|
(10,662)
|
(90,088)
|
Results of operations before income tax
|
324,173
|
(26,347)
|
7,226
|
(2,611)
|
302,441
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
(119,944)
|
3,952
|
(2,457)
|
783
|
(117,666)
|
Results of oil and gas operations
|
204,229
|
(22,395)
|
4,769
|
(1,828)
|
184,775
|
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Total
|
Year ended 31 December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
263,076
|
32,738
|
34,238
|
70
|
330,122
|
Production costs, excluding depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs
|
(42,677)
|
(19,685)
|
(7,603)
|
(325)
|
(70,290)
|
Royalties
|
(24,236)
|
(1,314)
|
(3,134)
|
(13)
|
(28,697)
|
Total production costs
|
(66,913)
|
(20,999)
|
(10,737)
|
(338)
|
(98,987)
|
Exploration expenses
(a)
|
(3,856)
|
(1,404)
|
(3,985)
|
(707)
|
(9,952)
|
Accretion expense
(b)
|
(855)
|
(994)
|
(930)
|
-
|
(2,779)
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
(38,721)
|
(22,705)
|
(10,659)
|
(8)
|
(72,093)
|
Results of operations before income tax
|
152,731
|
(13,364)
|
7,927
|
(983)
|
146,311
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
(61,161)
|
2,005
|
(2,695)
|
344
|
(61,507)
|
Results of oil and gas operations
|
91,570
|
(11,359)
|
5,232
|
(639)
|
84,804
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
37 Supplemental information on oil and
gas activities (unaudited – continued)
Table 3 - Results of operations for oil
and gas producing activities (continued)
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Total
|
Year ended 31 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
126,228
|
36,723
|
29,719
|
-
|
192,670
|
Production costs, excluding depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs
|
(29,326)
|
(20,674)
|
(5,738)
|
-
|
(55,738)
|
Royalties
|
(7,281)
|
(1,495)
|
(2,721)
|
-
|
(11,497)
|
Total production costs
|
(36,607)
|
(22,169)
|
(8,459)
|
-
|
(67,235)
|
Exploration expenses
(a)
|
(11,690)
|
(21,060)
|
(5,636)
|
-
|
(38,386)
|
Accretion expense
(b)
|
(459)
|
(897)
|
(1,198)
|
-
|
(2,554)
|
Impairment loss reversal for non-financial assets
|
5,664
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
5,664
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
(29,439)
|
(29,890)
|
(12,785)
|
-
|
(72,114)
|
Results of operations before income tax
|
53,697
|
(37,293)
|
1,641
|
-
|
18,045
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
(21,479)
|
5,594
|
(558)
|
-
|
(16,443)
|
Results of oil and gas operations
|
32,218
|
(31,699)
|
1,083
|
-
|
1,602
|
|
(a)
|
Do not include Peru costs.
|
|
(b)
|
Represents accretion of ARO and other environmental liabilities.
|
Table 4 - Reserve quantity information
Estimated oil and gas reserves
Proved reserves represent estimated quantities
of oil (including crude oil and condensate) and natural gas, which available geological and engineering data demonstrates with
reasonable certainty to be recoverable in the future from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved
developed reserves are proved reserves that can reasonably be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment
and operating methods. The choice of method or combination of methods employed in the analysis of each reservoir was determined
by the stage of development, quality and reliability of basic data, and production history.
The Group believes that its estimates of
remaining proved recoverable oil and gas reserve volumes are reasonable and such estimates have been prepared in accordance with
the SEC Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting rules, which were issued by the SEC at the end of 2008.
The Group estimates its reserves at least
once a year. The Group’s reserves estimation as of 31 December 2018, 2017 and 2016 was based on the DeGolyer and MacNaughton
Reserves Report (the “D&M Reserves Report”). DeGolyer and MacNaughton prepared its proved oil and natural gas reserve
estimates in accordance with Rule 4-10 of Regulation S–X, promulgated by the SEC, and in accordance with the oil and gas
reserves disclosure provisions of ASC 932 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) relating to Extractive Activities
- Oil and Gas (formerly SFAS no. 69 Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities).
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
37 Supplemental information on oil and
gas activities (unaudited – continued)
Table 4 - Reserve quantity information (continued)
Reserves engineering is a subjective process
of estimation of hydrocarbon accumulation, which cannot be exactly measured, and the reserve estimation depends on the quality
of available information and the interpretation and judgement of the engineers and geologists. Therefore, the reserves estimations,
as well as future production profiles, are often different than the quantities of hydrocarbons which are finally recovered. The
accuracy of such estimations depends, in general, on the assumptions on which they are based.
The estimated GeoPark net proved reserves
for the properties evaluated as of 31 December 2018, 2017 and 2016 are summarized as follows, expressed in thousands of barrels
(Mbbl) and millions of cubic feet (MMcf):
|
As of 31 December 2018
|
As of 31 December 2017
|
As of 31 December 2016
|
|
Oil and condensate (Mbbl)
|
Natural gas
(MMcf)
|
Oil and condensate (Mbbl)
|
Natural gas
(MMcf)
|
Oil and condensate (Mbbl)
|
Natural gas
(MMcf)
|
Net proved developed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colombia
(a)
|
32,326.0
|
1,763.0
|
21,101.0
|
-
|
9,502.0
|
-
|
Chile
(b)
|
696.0
|
11,944.0
|
720.0
|
8,688.0
|
547.0
|
6,610.0
|
Brazil
(c)
|
55.0
|
17,339.0
|
76.0
|
23,821.0
|
72.0
|
29,525.0
|
Argentina
(d)
|
2,058.0
|
6,207.0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Peru
(e)
|
-
|
-
|
9,502.0
|
-
|
9,316.0
|
-
|
Total consolidated
|
35,135.0
|
37,253
|
31,399.0
|
32,509.0
|
19,437.0
|
36,135.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proved undeveloped
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colombia
(f)
|
42,449.0
|
359.0
|
44,398.0
|
-
|
27,838.0
|
-
|
Chile
(g)
|
2,622.0
|
8,823.0
|
3,423.0
|
11,329.0
|
6,052.0
|
29,690.0
|
Argentina
(h)
|
1,440.0
|
3,174.0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Peru
(e)
|
18,460.0
|
-
|
9,215.0
|
-
|
9,305.0
|
-
|
Total consolidated
|
64,971.0
|
12,356.0
|
57,036.0
|
11,329.0
|
43,195.0
|
29,690.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total proved reserves
|
100,106.0
|
49,609.0
|
88,435.0
|
43,838.0
|
62,632.0
|
65,825.0
|
|
(a)
|
Llanos
34 Block, La Cuerva Block, Yamu Block and Llanos 32 Block account for 96%, 1.5%, 1.5%
and 1% (Llanos 34 Block, La Cuerva Block and Yamu Block account for 98%, 1% and 1% in
2017, and Llanos 34 Block and Llanos 32 Block accounts for 99% and 1% in 2016) of the
proved developed reserves, respectively.
|
|
(b)
|
Fell
Block accounts for 100% (Fell Block and Flamenco Block account for 98% and 2% in 2017,
and Fell Block and Flamenco Block account for 99% and 1% in 2016) of the proved developed
reserves, respectively.
|
|
(c)
|
BCAM-40
Block accounts for 100% of the reserves.
|
|
(d)
|
Aguada
Baguales Block, Puesto Touquet Block, and El Porvenir Block account for 48%, 33% and
19% of the proved developed reserves, respectively.
|
|
(e)
|
Morona
Block accounts for 100% of the reserves.
|
|
(f)
|
Llanos
34 Block, La Cuerva Block and Yamu Block account for 97%, 2% and 1% (Llanos 34 Block,
La Cuerva Block and Yamu Block account for 97%, 2% and 1% in 2017, and Llanos 34 Block
accounts for 100% in 2016) of the proved undeveloped reserves, respectively.
|
|
(g)
|
Fell
Block accounts for 100% (Fell Block and Flamenco Block account for 97% and 3% in 2017,
and Fell Block and Flamenco Block account for 99% and 1% in 2016) of the proved undeveloped
reserves, respectively.
|
|
(h)
|
Aguada
Baguales Block and El Porvenir Block account for 75% and 25% of the proved undeveloped
reserves, respectively.
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
37 Supplemental information on oil and
gas activities (unaudited – continued)
Table 5 - Net proved reserves of oil,
condensate and natural gas
Net proved reserves (developed and undeveloped)
of oil and condensate:
Thousands of barrels
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Peru
|
Total
|
Reserves as of 31 December 2015
|
30,423.3
|
5,953.8
|
120.0
|
-
|
-
|
36,497.1
|
Increase (decrease) attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions
(a)
|
5,779.0
|
1,148.0
|
(34.0)
|
-
|
-
|
6,893.0
|
Extensions and discoveries
(b)
|
6,311.0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,311.0
|
Purchase of Minerals in place
(c)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
18,621.0
|
18,621.0
|
Production
|
(5,173.3)
|
(502.8)
|
(14.0)
|
-
|
-
|
(5,690.1)
|
Reserves as of 31 December 2016
|
37,340.0
|
6,599.0
|
72.0
|
-
|
18,621.0
|
62,632.0
|
Increase (decrease) attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions
(d)
|
6,315.0
|
(2,109.0)
|
19.0
|
-
|
96.0
|
4,321.0
|
Extensions and discoveries
(e)
|
29,047.0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
29,047.0
|
Production
|
(7,203.0)
|
(347.0)
|
(15.0)
|
-
|
-
|
(7,565.0)
|
Reserves as of 31 December 2017
|
65,499.0
|
4,143.0
|
76.0
|
-
|
18,717.0
|
88,435.0
|
Increase (decrease) attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions
(f)
|
9,826.0
|
(586.0)
|
(6.0)
|
-
|
(257.0)
|
8,977.0
|
Extensions and discoveries
(g)
|
8,839.0
|
41.0
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8,880.0
|
Purchase of Minerals in place
(h)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,968.0
|
-
|
3,968.0
|
Production
|
(9,389.0)
|
(280.0)
|
(15.0)
|
(470.0)
|
-
|
(10,154.0)
|
Reserves as of 31 December 2018
|
74,775.0
|
3,318.0
|
55.0
|
3,498.0
|
18,460.0
|
100,106.0
|
|
(a)
|
For
the year ended 31 December 2016, the Group’s oil and condensate proved reserves
were revised upward by 7 mmbbl. The primary factors leading to the above were:
|
- Better
than expected performance from existing wells, resulting in an increase of 9 mmbbl, of which 8 mmbbl was from the Tigana, Jacana
and other minor fields in the Llanos 34 Block, and 1 mmbbl was from the Fell Block in Chile.
- Such
increase was partially offset by lower average oil prices impacting the La Cuerva and Yamu Blocks in Colombia, resulting in a
2 mmbbl decrease.
|
(b)
|
In
Colombia, the extensions and discoveries are primarily due to the Jacana field appraisal
wells in the Llanos 34 Block.
|
|
(c)
|
In
December 2016, we obtained final regulatory approval for our acquisition of the Morona
Block in Peru. The Joint Investment and Operating Agreement dated 1 October 2014 and
its amendments were closed on 1 December 2016 following the issuance of Supreme Decree
031-2016-MEM.XXX.
|
|
(d)
|
For
the year ended 31 December 2017, the Group’s oil and condensate proved reserves
were revised upward by 4.3 mmbbl. The primary factors leading to the above were:
|
- Better
than expected performance from existing wells, from the Tigana and Jacana fields in the Llanos 34 Block, resulting in an increase
of 3.8 mmbbl.
- The
impact of higher average oil prices resulting in a 2.5 mmbbl and 0.4 mmbbl increase in reserves from the blocks in Colombia and
Chile, respectively.
- Such
increase was partially offset by a decrease in reserves mainly related to a change in a previously adopted development plan in
the Fell Block in Chile, resulting in a 2.4 mmbbl decrease.
|
(e)
|
In
Colombia, the extensions and discoveries are primary due to the Chiricoca, Jacamar, and
Curucucu field discoveries in the Llanos 34 Block and the Tigana and Jacana field extensions
in the Llanos 34 Block.
|
|
(f)
|
For
the year ended 31 December 2018, the Group’s oil and condensate proved reserves
were revised upward by 9.0 mmbbl. The primary factors leading to the above were:
|
- Better
than expected performance from existing wells, from the Tigana and Jacana fields in the Llanos 34 Block, resulting in an increase
of 15.4 mmbbl.
- The
impact of higher average oil prices resulting in a 0.7 mmbbl, 1.0 mmbbl and 0.3 mmbbl increase in reserves from the blocks in
Colombia, Peru and Chile, respectively.
- Such
increase was partially offset by a decrease in reserves mainly related to a change in a previously adopted development plan in
Max, Tua, Chachalaca Sur, Tilo, and Jacamar fields in the Llanos 34 Block, resulting in a 6.3 mmbbl decrease. Also, lower than
expected performance from existing wells in Fell Block, resulted in a 0.8 mmbbl decrease. Finally, revisions in Peru resulted
in a 1.3 mmbbl decrease.
|
(g)
|
In
Colombia, the extensions and discoveries are primary due to the Tigana and Jacana fields
appraisal wells and the Tigui field discovery in the Llanos 34 Block.
|
|
(h)
|
Purchase
of Minerals in place refers to the Aguada Baguales, El Porvenir, and Puesto Touquet fields
acquisition during 2018. See Note 35.3 for further details.
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
37 Supplemental information on oil and
gas activities (unaudited – continued)
Table 5 - Net proved reserves of oil,
condensate and natural gas (continued)
Net proved reserves (developed and undeveloped)
of natural gas:
Millions of cubic feet
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Total
|
Reserves as of 31 December 2015
|
-
|
36,515.0
|
36,158.0
|
-
|
72,673.0
|
Increase (decrease) attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions
(a)
|
-
|
5,078.0
|
(319.0)
|
-
|
4,759.0
|
Production
|
-
|
(5,293.0)
|
(6,314.0)
|
-
|
(11,607.0)
|
Reserves as of 31 December 2016
|
-
|
36,300.0
|
29,525.0
|
-
|
65,825.0
|
Increase (decrease) attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions
(b)
|
-
|
(13,725.0)
|
59.0
|
-
|
(13,666.0)
|
Extensions and discoveries
(c)
|
-
|
1,187.0
|
-
|
-
|
1,187.0
|
Production
|
-
|
(3,745.0)
|
(5,763.0)
|
-
|
(9,508.0)
|
Reserves as of 31 December 2017
|
-
|
20,017.0
|
23,821.0
|
-
|
43,838.0
|
Increase (decrease) attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions
(d)
|
-
|
544.0
|
(679.0)
|
-
|
(135.0)
|
Extensions and discoveries
(e)
|
2,122.0
|
3,909.0
|
-
|
-
|
6,031.0
|
Purchase of Minerals in place
(f)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10,452.0
|
10,452.0
|
Production
|
-
|
(3,703.0)
|
(5,803.0)
|
(1,071.0)
|
(10,577.0)
|
Reserves as of 31 December 2018
|
2,122.0
|
20,767.0
|
17,339.0
|
9,381.0
|
49,609.0
|
|
(a)
|
For
the year ended 31 December 2016, the Group’s proved natural gas reserves were revised
upwards by 5 billion cubic feet. This increase was mainly driven by better than expected
performance from existing wells, primarily the Ache field in the Fell Block in Chile,
resulting in an addition of 9 billion cubic feet. This increase was partially offset
by a reduction of 4 billion cubic feet in the Pampa Larga field, also in the Fell Block.
|
|
(b)
|
For
the year ended 31 December 2017, the Group’s proved natural gas reserves were revised
downwards by 13.7 billion cubic feet. This was the combined effect of:
|
- Removal
of proved undeveloped reserves due to changes in previously adopted development plan in the Fell Block in Chile and unsuccessful
proved undeveloped executions in the Fell Block in Chile (totalling 21.3 billion cubic feet).
- The
above was partially offset by an increase of 6.8 billion cubic feet due to a better performance in the proved developed producing
reserves in the Fell Block in Chile and the impact of higher average prices that resulted in an increase of 0.8 billion cubic
feet.
|
(c)
|
In
Chile, the extensions and discoveries are primary due to the Uaken Field discovery in
the Fell Block.
|
|
(d)
|
For
the year ended 31 December 2018, the Group’s proved natural gas reserves were revised
downwards by 0.1 billion cubic feet. This was the combined effect of:
|
- Removal
of proved undeveloped reserves due to changes in previously adopted development plan in the Fell Block in Chile and lower than
expected performance from existing wells in the Fell Block in Chile (totalling 2.0 billion cubic feet).
- Lower
than expected performance from existing wells in BCAM-40 Block, resulting in a decrease of 0.7 billion cubic feet.
- The
above was partially offset by higher average prices that resulted in an increase of 2.5 billion cubic feet in the Fell Block in
Chile.
|
(e)
|
The
extensions and discoveries are primary due to the Jauke Field discovery in the Fell Block,
in Chile, and the gas discovery of the Une Formation in the Llanos 32 Block, in Colombia.
|
|
(f)
|
Purchase
of Minerals in place refers to the Aguada Baguales, El Porvenir, and Puesto Touquet fields
acquisition during 2018. See Note 35.3 for further details.
|
Revisions refer to changes in interpretation
of discovered accumulations and some technical and logistical needs in the area obliged to modify the timing and development plan
of certain fields under appraisal and development phases.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
37 Supplemental information on oil and
gas activities (unaudited – continued)
Table 6 - Standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows related to proved oil and gas reserves
The following table discloses estimated
future net cash flows from future production of proved developed and undeveloped reserves of crude oil, condensate and natural
gas. As prescribed by SEC Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting rules and ASC 932 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) relating to Extractive Activities – Oil and Gas (formerly SFAS no. 69 Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities),
such future net cash flows were estimated using the average first day-of-the-month price during the 12-month period for 2018, 2017
and 2016 and using a 10% annual discount factor. Future development and abandonment costs include estimated drilling costs, development
and exploitation installations and abandonment costs. These future development costs were estimated based on evaluations made by
the Group. The future income tax was calculated by applying the statutory tax rates in effect in the respective countries in which
we have interests, as of the date this supplementary information was filed.
This standardized measure is not intended
to be and should not be interpreted as an estimate of the market value of the Group’s reserves. The purpose of this information
is to give standardized data to help the users of the financial statements to compare different companies and make certain projections.
It is important to point out that this information does not include, among other items, the effect of future changes in prices,
costs and tax rates, which past experience indicates that are likely to occur, as well as the effect of future cash flows from
reserves which have not yet been classified as proved reserves, of a discount factor more representative of the value of money
over the lapse of time and of the risks inherent to the production of oil and gas. These future changes may have a significant
impact on the future net cash flows disclosed below. For all these reasons, this information does not necessarily indicate the
perception the Group has on the discounted future net cash flows derived from the reserves of hydrocarbons.
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
37 Supplemental information on oil and gas
activities (unaudited – continued)
Table 6 - Standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows related to proved oil and gas reserves (continued)
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Peru
|
Total
|
At 31 December 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
4,059,619
|
317,437
|
102,104
|
277,429
|
1,352,159
|
6,108,748
|
Future production costs
|
(983,782)
|
(156,724)
|
(49,255)
|
(173,053)
|
(441,801)
|
(1,804,615)
|
Future development costs
|
(207,630)
|
(39,360)
|
(3,752)
|
(54,400)
|
(293,468)
|
(598,610)
|
Future income taxes
|
(848,519)
|
(2,515)
|
(2,231)
|
(6,610)
|
(189,922)
|
(1,049,797)
|
Undiscounted future net cash flows
|
2,019,688
|
118,838
|
46,866
|
43,366
|
426,968
|
2,655,726
|
10% annual discount
|
(640,625)
|
(29,008)
|
(5,317)
|
(8,499)
|
(188,435)
|
(871,884)
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
1,379,063
|
89,830
|
41,549
|
34,867
|
238,533
|
1,783,842
|
At 31 December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
2,434,954
|
284,711
|
157,527
|
-
|
1,047,540
|
3,924,732
|
Future production costs
|
(531,751)
|
(131,788)
|
(56,311)
|
-
|
(466,110)
|
(1,185,960)
|
Future development costs
|
(187,414)
|
(57,690)
|
(7,524)
|
-
|
(235,920)
|
(488,548)
|
Future income taxes
|
(558,226)
|
(656)
|
(10,442)
|
-
|
(107,294)
|
(676,618)
|
Undiscounted future net cash flows
|
1,157,563
|
94,577
|
83,250
|
-
|
238,216
|
1,573,606
|
10% annual discount
|
(343,561)
|
(19,338)
|
(13,293)
|
-
|
(147,682)
|
(523,874)
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
814,002
|
75,239
|
69,957
|
-
|
90,534
|
1,049,732
|
At 31 December 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows
|
873,771
|
394,993
|
200,713
|
-
|
941,463
|
2,410,940
|
Future production costs
|
(229,593)
|
(186,700)
|
(74,116)
|
-
|
(497,187)
|
(987,596)
|
Future development costs
|
(69,996)
|
(149,785)
|
(16,352)
|
-
|
(234,328)
|
(470,461)
|
Future income taxes
|
(191,096)
|
(8,344)
|
(21,041)
|
-
|
(69,698)
|
(290,179)
|
Undiscounted future net cash flows
|
383,086
|
50,164
|
89,204
|
-
|
140,250
|
662,704
|
10% annual discount
|
(113,584)
|
(14,709)
|
(15,688)
|
-
|
(109,321)
|
(253,302)
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
269,502
|
35,455
|
73,516
|
-
|
30,929
|
409,402
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018
Note
37 Supplemental
information on oil and gas activities (unaudited – continued)
Table 7 - Changes in the standardized measure
of discounted future net cash flows from proved reserves
Amounts in US$ '000
|
Colombia
|
Chile
|
Brazil
|
Argentina
|
Peru
|
Total
|
Present value at 31 December 2015
|
300,097
|
68,155
|
72,316
|
-
|
-
|
440,568
|
Sales of hydrocarbon, net of production costs
|
(91,163)
|
(15,127)
|
(20,945)
|
-
|
-
|
(127,235)
|
Net changes in sales price and production costs
|
(171,131)
|
(16,854)
|
16,366
|
-
|
-
|
(171,619)
|
Changes in estimated future development costs
|
14,941
|
(49,763)
|
542
|
-
|
-
|
(34,280)
|
Extensions and discoveries less related costs
|
76,641
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
76,641
|
Development costs incurred
|
17,302
|
9,417
|
2,214
|
-
|
-
|
28,933
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
70,180
|
22,765
|
(1,872)
|
-
|
-
|
91,073
|
Purchase of Minerals in place
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
30,929
|
30,929
|
Net changes in income taxes
|
3,030
|
8,256
|
(4,020)
|
-
|
-
|
7,266
|
Accretion of discount
|
49,605
|
8,606
|
8,915
|
-
|
-
|
67,126
|
Present value at 31 December 2016
|
269,502
|
35,455
|
73,516
|
-
|
30,929
|
409,402
|
Sales of hydrocarbon, net of production costs
|
(198,631)
|
(14,251)
|
(26,979)
|
-
|
-
|
(239,861)
|
Net changes in sales price and production costs
|
289,199
|
26,928
|
(3,000)
|
-
|
69,962
|
383,089
|
Changes in estimated future development costs
|
(124,053)
|
79,078
|
8,385
|
-
|
(9,725)
|
(46,315)
|
Extensions and discoveries less related costs
|
49,574
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
49,574
|
Development costs incurred
|
67,571
|
7,146
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
74,717
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
673,622
|
(69,594)
|
603
|
-
|
1,133
|
605,764
|
Net changes in income taxes
|
(258,842)
|
6,097
|
7,976
|
-
|
(11,828)
|
(256,597)
|
Accretion of discount
|
46,060
|
4,380
|
9,456
|
-
|
10,063
|
69,959
|
Present value at 31 December 2017
|
814,002
|
75,239
|
69,957
|
-
|
90,534
|
1,049,732
|
Sales of hydrocarbon, net of production costs
|
(380,829)
|
(18,923)
|
(24,781)
|
(21,243)
|
-
|
(445,776)
|
Net changes in sales price and production costs
|
397,064
|
16,093
|
(15,170)
|
-
|
191,288
|
589,275
|
Changes in estimated future development costs
|
(18,632)
|
413
|
(1,426)
|
-
|
9,611
|
(10,034)
|
Extensions and discoveries less related costs
|
271,933
|
12,323
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
284,256
|
Development costs incurred
|
85,880
|
2,980
|
-
|
737
|
-
|
89,597
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
257,540
|
(4,517)
|
(1,879)
|
-
|
(7,098)
|
244,046
|
Purchase of Minerals in place
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
55,373
|
-
|
55,373
|
Net changes in income taxes
|
(185,118)
|
(1,368)
|
6,808
|
-
|
(65,585)
|
(245,263)
|
Accretion of discount
|
137,223
|
7,590
|
8,040
|
-
|
19,783
|
172,636
|
Present value at 31 December 2018
|
1,379,063
|
89,830
|
41,549
|
34,867
|
238,533
|
1,783,842
|
GEOPARK LIMITED
31 DECEMBER 2018